Notebookcheck

技嘉 Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Delta Zhang), 04/22/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows

强大的马拉松运动员。 Aero 14是技嘉的第一款移动游戏本。它看起来很简洁,真的。高端的硬件配置,做工出色的铝制外壳,加上WQHD分辨率的屏幕以及容量惊人的电池。我们可以这么说:它表现的十分出色但是即使这样它依旧在某些部分做出了妥协。

Gigabyte Aero 14 (Aero 14 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 378.66, Nvidia Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4, 2400 MHz, 单通道, 两条内存插槽中的一条空余, 最大 32 GB
Display
14 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 210 PPI, LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
LiteOn CX2-8B256, 256 GB 
, m.2 2280 SSD
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ High Definition Audio-Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 复合 3.5mm 音频输入输出接口, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 335 x 250
Battery
94 Wh, 6200 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, 2 x 2 瓦, Keyboard: 巧克力, Keyboard Light: yes, 150瓦电源适配器, USB网卡, 恢复 DVD, Adobe Reader XI, CyberLink PowerDVD 12, MS Office Trial, XSplit Gamecaster Trial, various other tools., 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.878 kg, Power Supply: 466 g
Price
2000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14
Gigabyte Aero 14

Size Comparison

349 mm 247 mm 25 mm 2.1 kg345 mm 245 mm 22.8 mm 1.9 kg345 mm 235 mm 18 mm 2 kg335 mm 250 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Schenker XMG P407
 
76 MB/s ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 14
 
73 MB/s ∼96%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
 
22.6 MB/s ∼30% -69%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Schenker XMG P407
 
87 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Gigabyte Aero 14
 
87 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
 
25.55 MB/s ∼29% -71%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
684 MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
646 MBit/s ∼94% -6%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
480 MBit/s ∼70% -30%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade (2016)
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
591 MBit/s ∼100% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
503 MBit/s ∼85%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
439 MBit/s ∼74% -13%
244
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
264
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 290 cd/m² Average: 257 cd/m² Minimum: 9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 290 cd/m²
Contrast: 967:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.59 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 4.32 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Gigabyte Aero 14
LG Philips LP140QH1-SPF1 (LGD049A), , 2560x1440, 14
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, , 1920x1080, 14
Schenker XMG P407
LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1 (LGD046D), , 1920x1080, 14
Razer Blade (2016)
Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), , 3200x1800, 14
Response Times
13%
-12%
-24%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (17, 24)
31.6 (10.4, 21.2)
23%
47 (14, 33)
-15%
41 (15, 26)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
25 (4, 21)
24.4 (5.2, 19.2)
2%
27 (5, 22)
-8%
37 (9, 28)
-48%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
Screen
10%
3%
30%
Brightness middle
290
288.4
-1%
298
3%
328
13%
Brightness
257
282
10%
282
10%
328
28%
Brightness Distribution
79
83
5%
80
1%
69
-13%
Black Level *
0.3
0.35
-17%
0.27
10%
0.22
27%
Contrast
967
824
-15%
1104
14%
1491
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.59
2.61
43%
4.42
4%
1.91
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.68
7.34
15%
8.57
1%
3.23
63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.32
1.18
73%
4.11
5%
1.69
61%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.24 98%
2.5 88%
2.3 96%
CCT
7320 89%
6506 100%
6329 103%
6418 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
59
56.4
-4%
54
-8%
63
7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
92
86.4
-6%
82
-11%
97
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 11%
-5% / 1%
3% / 21%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 24 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
149 Points ∼94% -6%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points ∼92% -8%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
130 Points ∼82% -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG P407
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
738 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
730 Points ∼99%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points ∼91% -8%
Razer Blade (2016)
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
671 Points ∼91% -8%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
159 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
730 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
5234 Points ∼100% +11%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4796 Points ∼92% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
4702 Points ∼90%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
4214 Points ∼81% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG P407
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
4069 Points ∼100% +9%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
4016 Points ∼99% +8%
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, LiteOn CX2-8B256
3717 Points ∼91%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
3417 Points ∼84% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3717 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4702 points
Help
Gigabyte Aero 14
LiteOn CX2-8B256
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122
Schenker XMG P407
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Razer Blade (2016)
Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-68%
19%
-12%
Write 4k QD32
441
156.3
-65%
539
22%
480
9%
Read 4k QD32
601.6
247.4
-59%
625.4
4%
573.4
-5%
Write 4k
131.2
35.31
-73%
171
30%
139.6
6%
Read 4k
44.93
17.68
-61%
58.89
31%
42.22
-6%
Write 512
814.2
246.7
-70%
1276
57%
603.5
-26%
Read 512
984.7
223
-77%
320.3
-67%
654.8
-34%
Write Seq
794.6
299
-62%
1502
89%
603.4
-24%
Read Seq
1584
335.3
-79%
1345
-15%
1296
-18%
LiteOn CX2-8B256
Sequential Read: 1584 MB/s
Sequential Write: 794.6 MB/s
512K Read: 984.7 MB/s
512K Write: 814.2 MB/s
4K Read: 44.93 MB/s
4K Write: 131.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 601.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 441 MB/s
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11776 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 14
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11625 Points ∼99%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
10890 Points ∼92% -6%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
8376 Points ∼71% -28%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14977 Points ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte Aero 14
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14731 Points ∼98%
Razer Blade (2016)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
13891 Points ∼93% -6%
Schenker XMG P407
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
10402 Points ∼69% -29%
3DMark 11 Performance
11868 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
20574 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9778 points
Help
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte Aero 14
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
38.3 fps ∼100%
Razer Blade (2016)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.3 fps ∼97% -3%
#ff7777;">42 (Borderless Window possible only)42.4
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 38.3fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 77.529fps
The Division (2016) 46.937.8fps
For Honor (2017) 56 (Borderless Window possible only)fps
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) 66.260.135.7fps

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 32 / 33 dB(A)
Load
42 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Max. Load
 58.3 °C51.7 °C57.8 °C 
 42.6 °C45.4 °C38.6 °C 
 31.8 °C34.4 °C34.5 °C 
Maximum: 58.3 °C
Average: 43.9 °C
54.2 °C59.8 °C49.3 °C
47.8 °C52.7 °C42 °C
36.8 °C37.6 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 59.8 °C
Average: 46.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 58.3 °C / 137 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.8 °C / 140 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.1 °C / 84.4 F (-5.4 °C / -9.7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.444.82537.741.53130.933.2403537.75027.532.56326.929.58027.531.610029.141.512525.84116024.452.620022.862.825022.566.231522.367.240021.266.450021.364.363020.768.580019.772.2100020.267.2125019.664.2160019.67120001968.1250018.865.2315018.967.7400018.862.6500018.660.6630018.660.7800018.462.61000019.364.11250018.662.3160001862.5SPL31.678.9N1.646.8median 19.6median 64.2Delta23.236.237.941.143.538.239.93135.730.83525.931.425.633.424.943.323.550.126.55621.359.221.160.123.164.119.765.519.466.918.768.417.672.118.970.717.566.417.767.417.668.717.968.317.963.717.863.71861.41861.91853.818.152.218.145.218.138.730.478.71.444.5median 18.1median 63.726.936.433.736.43537.133.834.834.134.634.132.532.632.433.13231.230.63129.137.428.745.928.750.527.353.426.955.226.165.425.167.927.265.825.262.724.958.124.459.423.85923.557.523.360.923.564.323.369.523.166.823.169.123.367.123.252.523.437.236.676.72.838.9median 24.9median 592.69.438.540.839.236.129.63136.537.327.228.427.827.327.429.927.228.722.928.321.736.422.650.621.754.119.855.918.758.218.161.31867.617.370.916.867.716.963.717.160.217.168.317.167.817.166.217.563.617.461.617.466.517.367.717.363.817.457.41751.529.778.21.342.9median 17.4median 61.61.97.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGigabyte Aero 14Razer Blade (2016)MSI GS43VR 6RE-006USSchenker XMG P407
Gigabyte Aero 14 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Schenker XMG P407 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.6 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 13 / 20 Watt
Load midlight 78 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Gigabyte Aero 14
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Schenker XMG P407
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Power Consumption
-28%
-10%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
8
12.1
-51%
10
-25%
9
-13%
Idle Average *
13
19
-46%
15
-15%
14
-8%
Idle Maximum *
20
19.5
2%
24
-20%
22
-10%
Load Average *
78
106.7
-37%
82
-5%
72
8%
Load Maximum *
146
159
-9%
124
15%
124
15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
110

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 9min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
8h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 9min
Gigabyte Aero 14
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 94 Wh
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 61 Wh
Schenker XMG P407
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 45 Wh
Razer Blade (2016)
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 70 Wh
Battery Runtime
-42%
-45%
-54%
Reader / Idle
909
577
-37%
443
-51%
WiFi v1.3
524
261
-50%
241
-54%
243
-54%
Load
129
78
-40%
92
-29%
H.264
213

Pros

+ 轻薄
+ 坚固,制造出色的金属外壳
+ 非常合理的接口
+ 出色的Wi-Fi性能
+ 附有USB网卡
+ 可编程宏按键
+ 出色的键盘手感
+ 出色的触摸板
+ 无PWM
+ 支持英伟达 Optimus
+ 高速NVMe 固态硬盘
+ 在待机及非连续负载下系统噪音较低
+ 非常出色的电池续航时间

Cons

- 缺少Thunderbolt 3接口
- 电池不可更换
- 键盘设计需要时间习惯
- 按键印刷难以阅读
- 考虑价格因素屏幕亮度过低
- 不支持 G-Sync
- 中等风扇转速会产生烦人的啸叫
In review: Gigabyte Aero 14. Review unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.
In review: Gigabyte Aero 14. Review unit provided by Gigabyte Germany.

所以,是不是它的一切都很好呢?应该说接近。我们的缺点列表中的大部分项目都与典型的Aero 14用户无关。但是,风扇在中等转速下的啸叫声十分令人厌烦,技嘉迫切需要解决这个问题。

 

在另一方面。Aero 14整体上给我们留下了很好的印象。尽管有着容量巨大的电池,整体的铝质机身依旧轻薄。尽管键盘是为玩家设计的(带有多功能按键)非标准的键盘,其即使作为办公本其体验依旧是出色的。接口比我们想象的还要多,而且附带有USB网卡。而且,我们对它的性能感到满意。

 

它巨大的电池及其所带来的长电池续航时间是Aero 14区别于其他移动游戏本竞品的独一无二的特点。但它被散热风扇的高频啸叫问题所掩盖,这就是为什么我们不能推荐这台笔记本。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Gigabyte Aero 14 - 06/30/2017 v6(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Chassis
86 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
61 / 81 → 75%
Weight
65 / 20-67 → 95%
Battery
91%
Display
87%
Games Performance
92 / 85 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 92 → 100%
Temperature
79%
Noise
68 / 95 → 72%
Audio
70%
Camera
63 / 85 → 74%
Average
78%
86%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 技嘉 Aero 14 (7700HQ, GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-04-22 (Update: 2017-04-22)