坚固耐用的求生手机 - AGM G3 Pro 评测

Name: AGM G3 Pro
Brand: AGM

一切准备就绪

AGM G3 Pro 配备了热像仪、10,000 mAh 电池和真正的户外耐用性，旨在超越竞争对手。但这款坚固耐用的智能手机在日常使用、工作现场和户外的实际表现如何呢？
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 05/22/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Rugged Smartphone Touchscreen

AGM G3 Pro 的评价

AGM G3 Pro 的目标用户显然是户外用户、商人和任何希望拥有一款特别坚固耐用且具有实用特殊功能的智能手机的人。在测试中，这款坚固耐用的手机因其耐用的结构、极亮的露营灯、集成热像仪和超长的电池续航时间而脱颖而出。系统性能也足以满足日常使用，扬声器的最大音量也很高。

Test device courtesy of AGM

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

不过，AGM G3 Pro 也有明显的弱点。摄像头效果一般，显示屏尽管亮度不错，但无法与现代 OLED 面板相媲美，而且缺少双频 GNSS 和更快的 Wi-Fi 等通信功能。此外，它还存在重量大、不确定的更新支持，以及根据制造商的说法，电池设计的充电次数不是特别多等问题。

Pros

+ 坚固设计

+ 明亮的手电筒

+ 多功能红外热像仪

+ 专用功能按钮

+ 超长电池寿命

Cons

- 不支持 eSIM

- 不支持不确定的更新

- 仅支持单频 GNSS

- 电池寿命有限

- 未通过 DRM 认证

价格和供应情况

AGM G3 Pro 可直接从AGM 商店以及亚马逊和 Galaxus 等零售商处购买。以及亚马逊和 Galaxus 等零售商。

$664.05

AGM G3 Pro Flagship Ultra Rugged Smartphone Android 15, 25fps Thermal Camera, 6.72" FHD+120Hz Display, MTK 7300, PD Fast & Wireless Charging, 10000mAh, NFC/GPS/Camping Light/116dB Speaker | 24GB+512GB

AGM G3 Pro 的评价
规格AGM G3 Pro
外壳和功能 - 兼具坚固耐用和丰富功能的智能手机
通信和操作 - 仅配备单频全球导航卫星系统的室外电话
软件和可持续性 - AGM 未提供信息
摄像头 - AGM G3 Pro 的摄像头较弱
显示屏 - AGM G3 Pro 的高对比度液晶显示屏
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 配备联发科 SoC 的 AGM G3 Pro
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

坚固耐用的户外智能手机有很多，但真正将耐用性、现代技术和集成热像仪融为一体的却寥寥无几。这就是 AGM G3 Pro 的优势所在。这款坚固耐用的手机承诺拥有超长的电池续航时间、强大的户外功能，以及在工地、探险和日常使用中的可靠性能。但这款智能手机的实际测试表现如何呢？我们对 AGM G3 Pro 进行了深入了解，并概述了它的主要优缺点。

规格AGM G3 Pro

AGM G3 Pro

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 8c/8t, 4 x 2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78, 4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G615 MP2

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.72 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 392 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, TFT-LCD, Panda Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 494 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Audio jack (3.5 mm), USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, Accelerometer, Magnetometer, Gyroscope, OTG, FM radio, Camping light

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28AB, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 177.5 x 82.8

Battery

10000 mAh Lithium-Ion, max. charging speed: 33 W (wired) / 18 W (wireless), Battery charge time: 50 %: 56 min, 80 %: 93 min, 100 %: 138 min; Battery charge cycles: 800

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Sony IMX682, 1/1.73", f/1.8) + 2 MPix Macro (f/2.4); Video: Ultra HD (30 FPS); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (OV50D40, f/2.2); Video: Full HD (30 FPS) + Thermal imaging camera

Additional features

Screen protector, 33W-Charger- USB-C-Cabel, Stickers, SIM-Tool, Update Policy: XXX years Android-Updates, XXX years security patches, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I), Galileo (E1), SBAS | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L3 | IP68, IP69K, MIL-STD-810H | Body-SAR: 1.691 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.767 W/kgBiometric security: capactive fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: linear | Telephony features: Dual-Nano-SIM (Hybrid-SIM), Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Released

09/05/2025

Weight

375 g

Price

699 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳和功能 - 兼具坚固耐用和丰富功能的智能手机

AGM G3 Pro 当然不会赢得任何设计奖项，它的外观是典型的坚固耐用型智能手机的功能性外观。它给人的感觉非常坚固，做工简洁，但也很重。G3 Pro 具备防尘、防水、耐高压和蒸汽喷射清洗功能，并符合 MIL-STD-810H 标准，可从高达 1.5 米的高度跌落。其工作温度范围为 -20 °C 至 +60 °C。

大型露营灯位于背面显著位置，亮度非常高。G3 Pro 的另一个核心功能是热像仪。它可以测量一个可自由选择的固定点，也可以自动检测和标记传感器视野内最热和最冷的区域。不过，温度读数并不精确。在测试中，温度读数通常比红外温度计的读数高出几度。

此外，还集成了一个可配置的功能按钮和一个调频收音机接收器。

尺寸比较

Doogee S200 Ultra AGM G3 Pro Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Honor Magic8 Lite DIN A5 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)	35.4 MB/s +69%
Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=56, last 2 years)	31.6 MB/s +51%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	20.94 MB/s
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	18.28 MB/s -13%

通信和操作 - 仅配备单频全球导航卫星系统的室外电话

支持的移动频率涵盖了在欧洲使用所需的所有频段，但对于 AGM G3 Pro 来说，这些频段还不够广泛，不足以让它成为一款真正的环球旅行手机。此外，这款智能手机仅支持带宽有限的 Wi-Fi 5。作为一款户外智能手机，仅支持单频 GNSS 也令人失望。

G3 Pro 有一个混合插槽。这意味着它支持两张 nano-SIM 卡或一张 nano-SIM 卡和一张 microSD 卡。语音质量一般，环境噪声几乎没有得到抑制。

电源按钮上的电容式指纹扫描仪速度不错，识别率也相当高。根据 AGM 的说法，强振动电机是线性型号，但感觉相当松软。我们猜测它可能是价格较低的 ERM 电机。

Networking
AGM G3 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	402 (min: 383) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	383 (min: 378) MBit/s ∼52%
Doogee S200 Ultra Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	972 (min: 484) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	891 (min: 690) MBit/s ∼57%
Honor Magic8 Lite 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	500 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	444 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	880 (min: 553) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1562 (min: 1262) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	309 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼24%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	315 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼20%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1269 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1404 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼90%

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø880 (553-1008)

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1562 (1262-1620)

AGM G3 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø402 (383-420)

AGM G3 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø382 (378-386)

软件和可持续性 - AGM 未提供信息

外包装很大，还含有塑料。AGM 没有提供任何有关 G3 Pro 可持续性的信息，而且这款智能手机也没有设计成可维修的。

更新支持不确定。根据EPREL 数据库，更新支持期为五年。AGM 在被问及安全补丁时也证实了这一点。不过，AGM 不会完全承诺Android 版本的更新，尽管该公司正在考虑更新到Android 16 和Android 17。

摄像头 - AGM G3 Pro 的摄像头较弱

前置摄像头拍摄的照片相当不错，但有些过度锐化，色彩有时过于鲜艳。在弱光环境下，图像质量也会明显下降。

两个后置摄像头的拍摄效果也不尽如人意。主摄像头缺乏细节和图像稳定功能，边缘也很模糊。变焦仅为数码变焦，最大为 10 倍。

视频只能以 30 FPS 的速度录制。主摄像头支持超高清录制，而前置摄像头最高为全高清。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

No screenshots found ()

显示屏 - AGM G3 Pro 的高对比度液晶显示屏

AGM G3 Pro 采用大尺寸 TFT 液晶屏，亮度相对较高，但与当前 OLED 面板的亮度水平相比仍有差距。虽然黑阶略有提升，但仍有助于 G3 Pro 实现清晰的对比度。

显示屏的色调偏冷，蓝色调的还原不够准确。不过，这在日常使用中并不明显。

我们在最低显示亮度下测得了相当高频率的闪烁，但这不是脉宽调制（PWM）。


544 cd/m²	614 cd/m²	637 cd/m²
535 cd/m²	616 cd/m²	626 cd/m²
544 cd/m²	580 cd/m²	588 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 637 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 587.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.88 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 616 cd/m²
Contrast: 1232:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 8.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 11.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 11490 K

	AGM G3 Pro TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Doogee S200 Ultra IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Honor Magic8 Lite OLED, 2640x1200, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Screen		0%	107%	3%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	616	396 -36%	1754 185%	495 -20%
Brightness (cd/m²)	587	386 -34%	1748 198%	466 -21%
Brightness Distribution (%)	84	82 -2%	98 17%	86 2%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.5	0.44 12%		0.58 -16%
Contrast (:1)	1232	900 -27%		853 -31%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	8.8	6.3 28%	1.5 83%	5.85 34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	15.4	12.9 16%	3.5 77%	9.78 36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	11.5	6.5 43%	2.4 79%	7 39%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.231 ^99%
CCT	11490 ^57%	8209 ^79%	6358 ^102%	8691 ^75%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1785 cd/m² +184%
AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	628 cd/m²
Doogee S200 Ultra Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash	395 cd/m² -37%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5962 cd/m² +1153%
AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	476 cd/m²
Doogee S200 Ultra Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash	396 cd/m² -17%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

555 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 555 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 555 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7837 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
15.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.669 ms rise
15.94 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.27 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
36.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.03 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 配备联发科 SoC 的 AGM G3 Pro

联发科联发科 Dimensity 7300定位中端，从价格上看似乎有点不够强劲。不过，系统速度相当不错，足以应付日常任务。

AGM G3 Pro 的扬声器声音很大，但没有达到制造商宣传的 116 dB(A)。

由于电池容量大，电池续航时间非常长。遗憾的是，电池本身的寿命并不长，因为 AGM 规定其充电次数仅为 800 次。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=197, last 2 years)	1845 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	1161 Points +15%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	1112 Points +10%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1042 Points +3%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1008 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (541 - 1058, n=16)	1001 Points -1%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 13231, n=197, last 2 years)	5492 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	3351 Points +14%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3124 Points +6%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2976 Points +1%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2942 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1906 - 3214, n=16)	2899 Points -1%

3DMark
Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	4229 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3808 Points
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	3636 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (2985 - 3272, n=12)	3149 Points
Average of class Smartphone (270 - 7687, n=86, last 2 years)	3085 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone (271 - 30892, n=177, last 2 years)	12283 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	4253 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3766 Points
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	3700 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (3095 - 3279, n=16)	3151 Points
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone (61 - 8263, n=178, last 2 years)	3231 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	1094 Points
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1014 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	992 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (835 - 883, n=14)	859 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone (62 - 8271, n=177, last 2 years)	3216 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	1094 Points
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1016 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	955 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (828 - 902, n=15)	853 Points

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=192, last 2 years)	61.9 fps +72%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	42 fps +17%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	36 fps
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	32 fps -11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (25 - 37, n=15)	31.2 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	30 fps -17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 378, n=192, last 2 years)	130.9 fps +227%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	47 fps +18%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	47 fps +18%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	44 fps +10%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	40 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (36 - 41, n=15)	39.2 fps -2%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 144, n=193, last 2 years)	50.2 fps +128%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	27 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	22 fps 0%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	22 fps
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	20 fps -9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (15 - 23, n=15)	19.3 fps -12%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 151, n=192, last 2 years)	50.4 fps +236%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	18 fps +20%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	18 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	17 fps +13%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	15 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (14 - 17, n=15)	14.7 fps -2%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone (0.54 - 62, n=193, last 2 years)	23 fps +254%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	7.9 fps +22%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	7.8 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	7.6 fps +17%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	6.5 fps
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (5 - 7.4, n=15)	6.37 fps -2%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=104, last 2 years)	685 Points +27%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	575 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (518 - 584, n=7)	545 Points +1%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	541 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	216 Points -60%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=104, last 2 years)	2727 Points +108%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (1266 - 2006, n=7)	1432 Points +9%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1320 Points +1%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	1312 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	217 Points -83%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=104, last 2 years)	4048 Points +50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (2586 - 5208, n=7)	3065 Points +14%
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2721 Points +1%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	2699 Points
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	502 Points -81%

CrossMark
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=113, last 2 years)	1209 Points +74%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	746 Points +7%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	696 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	689 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (390 - 759, n=9)	672 Points -3%
Productivity
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 2366, n=113, last 2 years)	1098 Points +45%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	800 Points +6%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	757 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	735 Points -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (418 - 837, n=9)	731 Points -3%
Creativity
Average of class Smartphone (310 - 2123, n=113, last 2 years)	999 Points +56%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	648 Points +1%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	641 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	639 Points 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (342 - 661, n=9)	609 Points -5%
Responsiveness
Average of class Smartphone (466 - 13042, n=113, last 2 years)	3623 Points +421%
Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	922 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	708 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (467 - 886, n=9)	701 Points +1%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	695 Points

Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total
Average of class Smartphone (2 - 480, n=80, last 2 years)	216 Points +44%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 6144	160.6 Points +7%
AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	149.611 Points
Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288	146.12 Points -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (116.9 - 149.6, n=4)	127.8 Points -15%

	AGM G3 Pro	Doogee S200 Ultra	Honor Magic8 Lite	Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro	Average 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		260%	259%	-21%	201%	226%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	1864.48	2009.1 8%	1948.54 5%	1043.4 -44%	1875 ?(1023 - 2110, n=39) 1%	2241 ?(270 - 4370, n=182, last 2 years) 20%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	1410.8	1886.02 34%	1828.13 30%	232.6 -84%	1367 ?(575 - 2053, n=39) -3%	1923 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=182, last 2 years) 36%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	238.04	281.51 18%	344.19 45%	194.4 -18%	287 ?(208 - 386, n=39) 21%	307 ?(47.6 - 614, n=182, last 2 years) 29%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	39.19	422.57 978%	412.87 954%	63.5 62%	346 ?(39.2 - 745, n=39) 783%	360 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=182, last 2 years) 819%

Max. Load

Idle


43.3 °C	42.7 °C	39.3 °C
43.5 °C	40.2 °C	39.5 °C
42.1 °C	40.3 °C	38.1 °C

Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 41 °C


32.3 °C	38.3 °C	38.5 °C
32 °C	36.4 °C	37.7 °C
32.6 °C	34.5 °C	35.1 °C

Maximum: 38.5 °C
Average: 35.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 % 0%
AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 %
Doogee S200 Ultra Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.5 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	97.3 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % 0%
AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	98.7 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 % 0%
Doogee S200 Ultra Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % 0%
AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 %

AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø5.11 (5.09-5.12)

Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø5.93 (5.91-5.94)

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.56 (6.49-6.58)

AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.9 (18.9-19)

Doogee S200 Ultra Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø21.7 (21.6-21.9)

Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.8 (22.8-22.9)

Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.2 (24.8-25.5)

AGM G3 Pro Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.58 (2.57-2.59)

Doogee S200 Ultra Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7400X, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø3.03 (3.02-3.05)

Honor Magic8 Lite Adreno 810, SD 6 Gen 4, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø2.63 (2.61-2.64)

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

AGM G3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Honor Magic8 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 147)		40h 52min

Battery runtime
WiFi v1.3
AGM G3 Pro 10000 mAh	40.9 h
Doogee S200 Ultra 11000 mAh	29.4 h
Honor Magic8 Lite 7500 mAh	23 h
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 4350 mAh	14.8 h
H.264
Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro 4350 mAh	16.1 h

Notebookcheck 总体评分

AGM G3 Pro 是一款坚固耐用的户外智能手机，配有红外热像仪和超长的电池续航时间，但其摄像头性能较弱、功能设置有限、显示效果一般，在日常使用中明显打了折扣。

Back to the verdict

AGM G3 Pro - 05/18/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

81%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

56 / 69 → 81%

Weight

85%

Battery

100%

Display

75%

Games Performance

15 / 55 → 28%

Application Performance

62 / 85 → 73%

AI Performance

57%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

76 / 90 → 85%

Camera

63%

Average

58%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
30%

Power Use
95.4%

Repairability
0%

Software Updates
55.7%

Total Sustainability Score: 30.2%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 76.5%	AGM G3 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1	Amazon: List Price: 699€	375 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI TFT-LCD
2. 74.3%	Doogee S200 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400X ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 1024 GB UFS 3.1	Amazon: List Price: 629 US-Dollar	383 g	1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.72" 2400x1080 392 PPI IPS
3. 78%	Honor Magic8 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 3.1	Amazon: List Price: 400€	189 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.79" 2640x1200 427 PPI OLED
4. 75.8%	Samsung Galaxy XCover 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: $972.00 List Price: 609€	240 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.60" 2408x1080 400 PPI PLS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.