Notebookcheck

华为P30 Pro智能手机评测

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen), 06/08/2019
Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone Phablet

几近完美—— 去年,华为P20 Pro在手机摄影方面树立了新的标准,现在这家中国公司又回来了,希望能够在这些成功的基础上再接再厉。 P30 Pro还包括我们所期望的旗舰产品所具有的所有技术,并且价格低廉。请继续阅读,了解华为是否已开发出新的手机摄像奇迹,以及它与其他现有旗舰的竞争情况。

Huawei P30 Pro (P Series)
Processor
HiSilicon Kirin 980
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G76 MP10
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.47 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 398 PPI, 十点触控, OLED, HDR, glossy: yes, HDR
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 242.63 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB Type-C, Card Reader: 高达256 GB的纳米存储卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计,环境光传感器,气压计,指南针,指纹传感器, 陀螺仪,红外线,激光,色温, Infrared blaster, USB OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19. LTE FDD: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32; TDD: Band 34, 38, 39, 40., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.41 x 158.01 x 73.37
Battery
16.04 Wh, 4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.82 V, kabelloses Laden, Reverse Wireless Charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 40 MPix f / 1.6,OIS,27 mm。 2000万像素超广角相机:f / 2.2,16 mm。 8 00万像素长焦相机:f / 3.4,OIS,125 mm。 TOF相机,10倍混合变焦,50倍数码变焦
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix
Additional features
Keyboard: 虚拟, USB Type-C耳机,40 W充电器,USB线,SIM工具,快速入门指南, EMUI 9.1, 24 Months Warranty, IP68认证。 SAR值:Body-0.64 W / kg,Head-0.79 W / kg。, fanless, waterproof
Weight
192 g
Price
1099 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

158 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 236 g158.01 mm 73.37 mm 8.41 mm 192 g158 mm 76.7 mm 7.9 mm 184 g157.6 mm 74.1 mm 7.8 mm 198 g157.5 mm 77.4 mm 7.7 mm 208 g157.5 mm 74.67 mm 7.61 mm 173 g155 mm 73.88 mm 7.65 mm 174 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 549, max: 725) MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 624, max: 683) MBit/s ∼97%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
635 (min: 315, max: 645) MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼93% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
624 MBit/s ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=434)
226 MBit/s ∼33% -66%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei P30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
670 (min: 542, max: 717) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
647 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
602 MBit/s ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Adreno 640, 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
534 (min: 430, max: 578) MBit/s ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Adreno 630, 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
456 (min: 429, max: 468) MBit/s ∼68% -32%
Huawei P20 Pro
Mali-G72 MP12, Kirin 970, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
437 MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=434)
216 MBit/s ∼32% -68%
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Taking a sharp corner
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 – Taking a sharp corner
GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro - Overview
GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro - Overview
GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro – Cycling around a lake
GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro - Taking a sharp corner
GPS test: Huawei P30 Pro - Taking a sharp corner
Huawei P20 Pro (10x digital zoom)
Honor View 20 (10x digital zoom)
Samsung Galaxy S10+ (10x digital zoom)
Apple iPhone XS (10x digital zoom)
Huawei P30 Pro (10x hybrid zoom)
Huawei P30 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S10+
Apple iPhone XS
LG V40 ThinQ
Honor View 20
Huawei P20 Pro
Huawei P30 Pro

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Photographed with the main camera
Photographed with the main camera (5.2x hybrid zoom)
Macro photo taken with the main camera
Photographed with the main camera
Photographed with the main camera
Photographed with the main camera
Photographed with the main camera
Photographed with the ultra-wide-angle camera
Photographed with the main camera in night mode
Photographed with the ultra-wide-angle camera
Photographed with the main camera at 40 MP
Photographed with the main camera at 40 MP
Photographed with the main camera at 40 MP
Photographed with the main camera at 40 MP
Photographed with the main camera at 40 MP
Our test chart shot at 10 MP
Our test chart shot at 10 MP
Our test chart shot at 40 MP
Our test chart shot at 40 MP
Our test chart photographed using the ultra-wide-angle sensor
Our test chart in detail: Telephoto lens
Our test chart in detail: Hybrid zoom
595
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
576
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
584
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
647
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 647 cd/m² Average: 607.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 597 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Huawei P30 Pro
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Huawei P20 Pro
OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
Apple iPhone Xs Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi 9
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8
Google Pixel 3 XL
AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3
Screen
13%
-34%
9%
19%
-29%
-26%
Brightness middle
597
569
-5%
710
19%
656
10%
593
-1%
477
-20%
410
-31%
Brightness
608
578
-5%
721
19%
659
8%
587
-3%
453
-25%
413
-32%
Brightness Distribution
89
95
7%
97
9%
88
-1%
94
6%
86
-3%
97
9%
Black Level *
0.33
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.2
1.3
41%
3.7
-68%
1.7
23%
0.9
59%
2.1
5%
3.16
-44%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.6
2.1
42%
10.3
-186%
2.8
22%
2
44%
8.2
-128%
5.5
-53%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.6
1.6
-0%
1.5
6%
1.7
-6%
1.5
6%
1.6
-0%
1.7
-6%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.31 95%
2.1 105%
1.998 110%
2.27 97%
2.28 96%
2.219 99%
CCT
6268 104%
6401 102%
6611 98%
6487 100%
6548 99%
6425 101%
6653 98%
Contrast
1445

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 231.5 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 231.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 231.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9370 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8574 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10177 Points ∼71% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7482 Points ∼52% -13%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14417 Points ∼100% +68%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
10876 Points ∼75% +27%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
8025 Points ∼56% -6%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5677 - 9870, n=9)
7355 Points ∼51% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=320)
4684 Points ∼32% -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9880 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10259 Points ∼91% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11244 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10999 Points ∼98% +11%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8522 Points ∼76% -14%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8292 Points ∼74% -16%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
6756 Points ∼60% -32%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (9547 - 10024, n=9)
9838 Points ∼87% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 11598, n=379)
4700 Points ∼42% -52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3306 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4505 Points ∼94% +36%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4774 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3523 Points ∼74% +7%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2457 Points ∼51% -26%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2325 Points ∼49% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
1922 Points ∼40% -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3207 - 3378, n=9)
3303 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4824, n=379)
1419 Points ∼30% -57%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9135 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼86% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9035 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8178 Points ∼90% -10%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
9029 Points ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
6982 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (7567 - 9326, n=9)
8450 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=371)
5249 Points ∼57% -43%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12996 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10985 Points ∼85% -15%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9858 Points ∼76% -24%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
11180 Points ∼86% -14%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
8115 Points ∼62% -38%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (9728 - 13531, n=9)
11270 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14439, n=542)
5678 Points ∼44% -56%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4171 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2723 Points ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3754 Points ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2713 Points ∼65% -35%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3676 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2942 Points ∼71% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2227 - 4439, n=9)
3299 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4635, n=379)
1957 Points ∼47% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4361 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼76% +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4828 Points ∼68% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7076 Points ∼100% +62%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5651 Points ∼80% +30%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5789 Points ∼82% +33%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3109 Points ∼44% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2747 - 4361, n=9)
3868 Points ∼55% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=379)
1761 Points ∼25% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4317 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼77% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4121 Points ∼70% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5913 Points ∼100% +37%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4555 Points ∼77% +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5133 Points ∼87% +19%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3070 Points ∼52% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2611 - 4317, n=9)
3680 Points ∼62% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6875, n=380)
1634 Points ∼28% -62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4164 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2961 Points ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3788 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2721 Points ∼65% -35%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3280 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2940 Points ∼71% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2421 - 4493, n=9)
3422 Points ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=408)
1866 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5767 Points ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼43% -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
10374 Points ∼100% +80%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10291 Points ∼99% +78%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7609 Points ∼73% +32%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
8380 Points ∼81% +45%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3503 Points ∼34% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2536 - 5893, n=9)
4289 Points ∼41% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=408)
2340 Points ∼23% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5313 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼54% -24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
6667 Points ∼90% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7449 Points ∼100% +40%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5438 Points ∼73% +2%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6228 Points ∼84% +17%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3360 Points ∼45% -37%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2525 - 5511, n=9)
4053 Points ∼54% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=408)
1966 Points ∼26% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3849 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼77% -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3027 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3758 Points ∼98% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3620 Points ∼94% -6%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3605 Points ∼94% -6%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2926 Points ∼76% -24%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3380 - 4216, n=9)
3820 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4492, n=459)
1864 Points ∼48% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4400 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼82% +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3726 Points ∼59% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5190 Points ∼82% +18%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
5089 Points ∼80% +16%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3017 Points ∼47% -31%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2082 - 4400, n=9)
3851 Points ∼61% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=459)
1452 Points ∼23% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4264 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼81% +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
3544 Points ∼64% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5509 Points ∼100% +29%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4734 Points ∼86% +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4662 Points ∼85% +9%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2996 Points ∼54% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2276 - 4264, n=9)
3828 Points ∼69% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=460)
1398 Points ∼25% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3828 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼74% -25%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2713 Points ∼70% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3614 Points ∼93% -6%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2541 Points ∼65% -34%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3594 Points ∼92% -6%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
2885 Points ∼74% -25%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (3548 - 4215, n=9)
3887 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4454, n=500)
1727 Points ∼44% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5431 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼53% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
7055 Points ∼71% +30%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9963 Points ∼100% +83%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points ∼82% +51%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7780 Points ∼78% +43%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3335 Points ∼33% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2347 - 5431, n=9)
4073 Points ∼41% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=499)
1891 Points ∼19% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4969 Points ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼62% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
5205 Points ∼73% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7166 Points ∼100% +44%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5492 Points ∼77% +11%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
6180 Points ∼86% +24%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3223 Points ∼45% -35%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (2567 - 4996, n=9)
3987 Points ∼56% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8136, n=502)
1636 Points ∼23% -67%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31483 Points ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼88% +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
27717 Points ∼75% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
25339 Points ∼69% -20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
36762 Points ∼100% +17%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
15614 Points ∼42% -50%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
22441 Points ∼61% -29%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (19993 - 37164, n=9)
27400 Points ∼75% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=661)
14062 Points ∼38% -55%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
63469 Points ∼40%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼44% +11%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
159735 Points ∼100% +152%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
106534 Points ∼67% +68%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81502 Points ∼51% +28%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
53794 Points ∼34% -15%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
33472 Points ∼21% -47%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (42128 - 67956, n=9)
53493 Points ∼33% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=659)
21674 Points ∼14% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
51779 Points ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼72% +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
77599 Points ∼100% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
62225 Points ∼80% +20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
64152 Points ∼83% +24%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
34855 Points ∼45% -33%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
30176 Points ∼39% -42%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (34035 - 57073, n=9)
44122 Points ∼57% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=659)
17596 Points ∼23% -66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
138 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼42% -30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
226 fps ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼74% +21%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼66% +9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
140 fps ∼62% +1%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
121 fps ∼54% -12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (68 - 138, n=9)
106 fps ∼47% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=682)
37.5 fps ∼17% -73%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼97% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (55 - 62, n=9)
58.6 fps ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=691)
27.8 fps ∼46% -54%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
91 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼63% -26%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
107 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼93% +10%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
71 fps ∼66% -22%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
56 fps ∼52% -38%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
61 fps ∼57% -33%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (40 - 91, n=9)
68 fps ∼64% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=588)
21.6 fps ∼20% -76%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -10%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼97% -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
37 fps ∼62% -37%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
54 fps ∼90% -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (37 - 60, n=9)
54.3 fps ∼91% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=597)
19.2 fps ∼32% -67%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
56 fps ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼97% +20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
69.3 fps ∼100% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
69 fps ∼100% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58 fps ∼84% +4%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
45 fps ∼65% -20%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
39 fps ∼56% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (25 - 56, n=9)
44 fps ∼63% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=454)
17.7 fps ∼26% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
47 fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼63% -21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
58.9 fps ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
58 fps ∼98% +23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
56 fps ∼95% +19%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
25 fps ∼42% -47%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
36 fps ∼61% -23%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (24 - 54, n=9)
42.9 fps ∼73% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=456)
16.6 fps ∼28% -65%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼50% -20%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
32.1 fps ∼100% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
24 fps ∼75% +20%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
25 fps ∼78% +25%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
14 fps ∼44% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (19 - 21, n=8)
20.3 fps ∼63% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=172)
10.2 fps ∼32% -49%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼82%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼100% +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
16.3 fps ∼96% +16%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
16 fps ∼94% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼82% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
8.6 fps ∼51% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (13 - 14, n=8)
13.6 fps ∼80% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=171)
7.05 fps ∼41% -50%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼55% -19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
47 fps ∼100% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37 fps ∼79% +16%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
40 fps ∼85% +25%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
23 fps ∼49% -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (18 - 32, n=8)
29.4 fps ∼63% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=176)
14.9 fps ∼32% -53%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
36 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +28%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
36.8 fps ∼80% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼89% +14%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
38 fps ∼83% +6%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
23 fps ∼50% -36%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (30 - 36, n=8)
32.8 fps ∼71% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=176)
16.6 fps ∼36% -54%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
33 fps ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
40 fps ∼93% +21%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼98% +27%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼81% +6%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
33 fps ∼77% 0%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
23 fps ∼53% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (17 - 33, n=9)
28.4 fps ∼66% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=379)
12.1 fps ∼28% -63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼61% -15%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
31 fps ∼82% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps ∼100% +41%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼97% +37%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
18 fps ∼47% -33%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
22 fps ∼58% -19%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (15 - 30, n=9)
23.6 fps ∼62% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=383)
10.8 fps ∼28% -60%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
27.02 (min: 2.8, max: 80.83) fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼86% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
37.41 fps ∼100% +38%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
24.45 (min: 9.63, max: 65.63) fps ∼65% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (27 - 29.1, n=2)
28.1 fps ∼75% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.24 - 37.4, n=59)
17 fps ∼45% -37%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28.46 (min: 9.24, max: 54.37) fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼84% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
32.2 fps ∼100% +13%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
10.52 (min: 5, max: 27.66) fps ∼33% -63%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (16.9 - 28.5, n=2)
22.7 fps ∼70% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 37.3, n=53)
14.2 fps ∼44% -50%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
30.67 (min: 5.93, max: 132.19) fps ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼100% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
35.63 fps ∼93% +16%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
11.8 (min: 5.55, max: 28.23) fps ∼31% -62%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (25.6 - 30.7, n=2)
28.1 fps ∼73% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 39.7, n=50)
17.5 fps ∼45% -43%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
316199 Points ∼84%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
333277 Points ∼89% +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
302955 Points ∼81% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
374820 Points ∼100% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
246366 Points ∼66% -22%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
285269 Points ∼76% -10%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
207959 Points ∼55% -34%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (268359 - 316199, n=9)
292583 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (17073 - 462516, n=290)
141701 Points ∼38% -55%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
247307 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
273655 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
257246 Points ∼94% +4%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
226124 Points ∼83% -9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
215632 Points ∼79% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
179709 Points ∼66% -27%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (245662 - 254229, n=9)
250407 Points ∼92% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5600 - 293444, n=490)
87858 Points ∼32% -64%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5020 Score ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4964 Score ∼99% -1%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
1980 Score ∼39% -61%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5020 - 5025, n=2)
5023 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=57)
2139 Score ∼43% -57%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1409 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼80% -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1731 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1378 Points ∼80% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1400 Points ∼81% -1%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
1176 Points ∼68% -17%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
1273 Points ∼74% -10%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (1239 - 1430, n=9)
1329 Points ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=626)
754 Points ∼44% -46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7758 Points ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼54% +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
15659 Points ∼100% +102%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9270 Points ∼59% +19%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7743 Points ∼49% 0%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
7989 Points ∼51% +3%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3725 Points ∼24% -52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (4963 - 7758, n=9)
6356 Points ∼41% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=626)
2035 Points ∼13% -74%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5210 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼76% -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
1815 Points ∼32% -65%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points ∼72% -23%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3704 Points ∼66% -29%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
2825 Points ∼50% -46%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
4050 Points ∼72% -22%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (5210 - 6283, n=9)
5631 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=626)
1503 Points ∼27% -71%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8572 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼71% -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
11675 Points ∼100% +36%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8441 Points ∼72% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8418 Points ∼72% -2%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
4417 Points ∼38% -48%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
5965 Points ∼51% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (7597 - 8604, n=9)
8112 Points ∼69% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=626)
2951 Points ∼25% -66%
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4701 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼92% -4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
4895 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4595 Points ∼94% -2%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4288 Points ∼88% -9%
Google Pixel 3 XL
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 4096
3291 Points ∼67% -30%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
3271 Points ∼67% -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (4014 - 4746, n=9)
4419 Points ∼90% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=626)
1478 Points ∼30% -69%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Huawei P30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1627 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1928 Points ∼80% +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max
Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096
2407 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Mi 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1415 Points ∼59% -13%
Huawei P20 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 970, Mali-G72 MP12, 6144
887 Points ∼37% -45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
  (1571 - 1627, n=2)
1599 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (35 - 2754, n=102)
730 Points ∼30% -55%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
155 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
122 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼74% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
108 Points ∼70% -11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (86 - 124, n=9)
103 Points ∼66% -16%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
100 Points ∼65% -18%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
75 Points ∼48% -39%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
69 Points ∼45% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=157)
66.9 Points ∼43% -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
43114 Points ∼100% +92%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
24534 Points ∼57% +9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
22447 Points ∼52%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (20618 - 23285, n=9)
21662 Points ∼50% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼48% -7%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
16228 Points ∼38% -28%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
13360 Points ∼31% -40%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
11584 Points ∼27% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=684)
6701 Points ∼16% -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=709)
10602 ms * ∼100% -428%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65)
3852.2 ms * ∼36% -92%
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68)
3179 ms * ∼30% -58%
Google Pixel 3 XL (Chrome 70)
2785 ms * ∼26% -39%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (1948 - 3098, n=9)
2189 ms * ∼21% -9%
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
2009.1 ms * ∼19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
1873.2 ms * ∼18% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼18% +8%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)
603.1 ms * ∼6% +70%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
60.469 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)
57.207 Points ∼95% -5%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (48.4 - 60.9, n=6)
53.1 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=100)
35.5 Points ∼59% -41%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 74)
24.488 Points ∼40% -60%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Huawei P30 Pro (Chrome 73)
67.8 runs/min ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)
65.7 runs/min ∼97% -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980 (58.3 - 67.8, n=6)
61.7 runs/min ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼83% -17%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=89)
39.6 runs/min ∼58% -42%
Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 74)
27.1 runs/min ∼40% -60%

* ... smaller is better

Huawei P30 ProHuawei P20 ProSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusXiaomi Mi 9Sony Xperia XZ2 PremiumGoogle Pixel 3 XLAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-10%
-23%
6%
-45%
-21%
-10%
-56%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
68.19 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
60.74 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
30.23 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-56%
68.2
0%
49.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=417)
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.6 (Huawei NanoSD 128 GB)
73 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-12%
34.18 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-59%
82.6
0%
67.3 (8.1 - 96.5, n=417)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
159.22
160.49
1%
22.7
-86%
165.32
4%
21.75
-86%
132.7
-17%
98.1 (22.1 - 160, n=7)
-38%
21.5 (0.14 - 250, n=734)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
174.36
144.33
-17%
135.16
-22%
149.36
-14%
135.99
-22%
120.8
-31%
153 (127 - 174, n=7)
-12%
46.5 (1.59 - 196, n=734)
-73%
Sequential Write 256KB
250.82
196.69
-22%
249.06
-1%
388.27
55%
170.98
-32%
228.6
-9%
245 (228 - 253, n=7)
-2%
95.4 (2.99 - 590, n=734)
-62%
Sequential Read 256KB
849.48
831.82
-2%
811.17
-5%
666.06
-22%
748.59
-12%
632.6
-26%
807 (687 - 873, n=7)
-5%
269 (12.1 - 1504, n=734)
-68%
PUBG Mobile
010203040Tooltip
; 0.11.0: Ø30 (26-31)
World of Tanks
010203040506070Tooltip
; 5.9.0.669: Ø60.1 (44-61)
Battle Bay
010203040506070Tooltip
; 4.3.22176: Ø60.2 (60-61)
Max. Load
 35.5 °C35.3 °C33.4 °C 
 36.5 °C36.2 °C33.2 °C 
 35.8 °C35.8 °C33.5 °C 
Maximum: 36.5 °C
Average: 35 °C
33 °C33.4 °C33.9 °C
32.1 °C33.4 °C34.6 °C
32.9 °C34.2 °C34.7 °C
Maximum: 34.7 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.5 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.537.82523.7323125.8234022.225.75033.1376326.626.58024.223.610023.322.712521.832.916022.545.420018.250.325016.358.231515.66340015.164.950014.167.563013.967.880013.671100014.872.6125013.672.9160013.673.1200013.873.1250014.376.2315014.678.2400014.579.9500014.677.9630014.874.4800014.674.91000014.9771250014.973.61600014.959SPL26.687.5N0.871.6median 14.8median 72.6Delta1.58.634.832.622.424.922.724.923.820.930.930.920.422.42320.821.123.416.936.317.853.315.650.614.855.616.262.714.364.513.865.913.769.814.869.814.673.414.974.713.975.414.276.313.875.714.678.515.578.314.478.814.277.215.174.415.271.515.167.614.863.526.787.80.872.7median 14.8median 69.80.69.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHuawei P30 ProSamsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Huawei P30 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.68 / 2.6 / 2.77 Watt
Load midlight 3.74 / 6.82 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Average HiSilicon Kirin 980
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-7%
3%
14%
-0%
1%
31%
-4%
7%
Idle Minimum *
0.68
0.73
-7%
1
-47%
0.67
1%
0.67
1%
0.7
-3%
0.84
-24%
0.794 (0.6 - 0.97, n=9)
-17%
0.877 (0.2 - 3.4, n=769)
-29%
Idle Average *
2.6
1.53
41%
1.4
46%
1.26
52%
2.5
4%
1.4
46%
1.54
41%
2.04 (0.9 - 2.6, n=9)
22%
1.734 (0.6 - 6.2, n=768)
33%
Idle Maximum *
2.77
2.07
25%
1.7
39%
1.29
53%
2.51
9%
2
28%
1.57
43%
2.37 (1.83 - 2.77, n=9)
14%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=769)
27%
Load Average *
3.74
6.03
-61%
4.6
-23%
3.71
1%
4.3
-15%
4.8
-28%
2.47
34%
4.91 (3.74 - 6.3, n=9)
-31%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=763)
-9%
Load Maximum *
6.82
9.18
-35%
6.7
2%
9.3
-36%
6.87
-1%
9.5
-39%
2.49
63%
7.51 (6.15 - 9.85, n=9)
-10%
5.9 (1.2 - 14.2, n=763)
13%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 73)
13h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
19h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 44min
Huawei P30 Pro
4200 mAh
Huawei P20 Pro
4000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
Apple iPhone Xs Max
3174 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9
3300 mAh
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
3540 mAh
Google Pixel 3 XL
3430 mAh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-33%
-28%
-28%
-39%
-21%
Reader / Idle
1966
1727
-12%
1560
-21%
1305
-34%
1650
-16%
1347
-31%
1725
-12%
H.264
1193
784
-34%
921
-23%
801
-33%
1008
-16%
520
-56%
724
-39%
WiFi v1.3
838
744
-11%
483
-42%
742
-11%
546
-35%
547
-35%
691
-18%
Load
344
345
0%
187
-46%
223
-35%
194
-44%
235
-32%
299
-13%

Pros

+ 极其优秀的徕卡四摄
+ 明亮的OLED面板
+ IP68防水防尘
+ 可扩展的存储
+ 续航时间长
+ 带有HDMI和DisplayPort输出的USB 3.1
+ 快速有线和无线充电

Cons

- 一般般的扬声器
- 不附带3.5mm耳机接口转接器
- 摄像仍然有提升空间
- 游戏性能算不上最强
- 第二SIM槽为混合模式
华为P30 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.
华为P30 Pro智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany.

华为P30 Pro是2019年推出的旗舰级智能手机之一。该设备采用现代化设计,以优秀的硬件为基础。即使在一些游戏中表现一般,麒麟980 SoC也为系统提供了充足的性能。其8 GB的RAM和至少128 GB的内部存储应该让大多数人满意。我们也喜欢华为选择添加可扩展存储,即使是他们专有的nano存储卡格式。

华为也没有对某些细节嗤之以鼻。 P30 Pro经过IP68防尘和防水认证,同时可以像Mate 20 Pro和Galaxy S10系列一样为其他设备进行无线充电。P30 Pro与Mate 20 Pro共享其许多功能,尽管它缺乏后者拥有的3D面部识别功能。

徕卡四摄像头是这台手机的重中之重,但华为P30 Pro在其他领域也表现出色,并提供引人注目的旗舰体验。我们希望华为能够改善其视频性能,目前它还算不上最领先的。

与华为的前代产品相比,P30 Pro具有非常出色的相机。P30 Pro在低光条件下表现出色,能捕捉即使是肉眼也难以看到的细节。它还提供了领先的变焦镜头,比竞争对手领先一大截。然而,它的相机有它们的缺点。在我们的测试中,白平衡一直太红,而其视频功能还有很多不足之处。我们希望华为能够在即将到来的更新中解决我们的担忧,而且这台5000多块钱的智能手机居然没有60 FPS的4K拍摄。

总的来说,华为P30 Pro是一款出色但昂贵的智能手机。如果您意识到这一点,该设备不会让您失望,因为它有着同级领先的续航和拍照。

Huawei P30 Pro - 09/27/2019 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 90%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 95%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
48 / 64 → 75%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
81%
Average
82%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华为P30 Pro智能手机评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2019-06- 8 (Update: 2019-06- 8)