Notebookcheck Logo
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测

速度极快的 12.6 英寸Android 顶级平板电脑 - 小米 Pad 7S Pro 评测

经济实惠的全套服务。

作为一款中端平板电脑，Pad 7S Pro 的规格保证了其卓越的价值。高分辨率显示屏，支持手写笔，可选配防反射涂层、旗舰处理器和高达 1 TB 的存储空间。小米成功打造了完美的 iPad 杀手吗？
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Touchscreen Tablet

结论 - 小米 Pad 7S Pro

小米 Pad 7S Pro 拓展了平板电脑市场，是一款非常有吸引力的中端机型，其高端功能和相对低廉的价格给人留下了深刻印象。对于希望购买功能强大、配备齐全、拥有大尺寸显示屏并支持手写笔的Android 平板电脑，但又可以忍受没有蜂窝网络连接或位置跟踪功能的用户来说，小米 Pad 具有极高的性价比。

由于采用了该公司自己的 XRing O1 芯片组，Pad 7S Pro 非常适合中端市场，至少可以与 iPad Air 13 或Galaxy Tab S10+ 等更昂贵的竞争对手相媲美。不过，搭载骁龙 8 Elite 芯片的 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro 也与小米平板电脑处于同一价位，而且性能更强一些。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

小米 12.5 英寸平板电脑的 3:2 长宽比显示屏可能是 LCD 而不是 OLED，但即使是显示屏发烧友也会对 144 Hz 的面板感到满意。这在很大程度上要归功于它的高分辨率、良好的对比度和超过 900 cd/m² 的峰值亮度。一个特别的亮点是无 PWM 显示屏，这有助于提供无闪烁的舒适观看体验--这对于对此类问题敏感的用户来说是一大利好。

一个值得批评的问题是中国版本的更新政策不明确，尽管欧洲的全球版本预计至少会支持到 2031 年。此外，我们还看到一些小的批评意见，如缺乏内存扩展、重量稍重以及缺乏知识产权认证等。

Pros

+ 功能强大的芯片组，低节流
+ 高达 1TB 的快速存储
+ 良好的制造质量
+ 无 PWM 的出色 LCD
+ 电池寿命长、充电快
+ 配件丰富

Cons

- 没有带全球导航卫星系统的 5G 选项
- 可用性有限（目前只有 CN 版本）
- 关于更新时间的问号（CN 版本）
- 重量可能更轻

小米 Pad 7S Pro 的价格和上市时间

到目前为止，小米 Pad 7S Pro 已在中国亮相。基本机型配备 12GB 内存和 256GB 闪存，售价 3699 元（约合 515 美元）。包括防眩光 "柔光显示屏 "在内的顶配机型（16 GB 内存、1 TB）售价约为 652 美元，在深圳交易市场的进口价约为 580美元起。与 前代已在全球发布，我们可以预期欧洲也会跟进。

自从我们评测了 小米 Pad 7, Pad 7 Pro和 Pad 7 Ultra小米平板电脑（Xiaomi Pad 7）系列又添新成员--Pad 7S Pro。小米 Pad 7S Pro 是第二款基于自主研发的 Xring O1 ARM 芯片这意味着它的性能将与 OnePlus Pad 2 Pro、的性能相当。 高通骁龙8精英版.

与 15S Pro、与 "普通 "Pro 机型相比，小米对其中档平板电脑进行了重大改动，甚至超出了处理器的范围。在这篇评测中，我们将详细分析这些变化。

规格 - 小米 Pad 7S Pro

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro (Pad 7 Series)
Processor
Xiaomi Xring O1 10 x 1.8 - 3.9 GHz, Cortex-X925, A725, A520
Graphics adapter
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC16
Memory
16 GB 
Display
12.50 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 308 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, LCD, 1080 Hz touch rate , HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 481 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 279.1 x 191.9
Battery
10610 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", PDAF)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 19 mm, 1/3.6", FF)
Additional features
Speakers: 6 speaker, charger, USB cable, HyperOS, 12 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, keyboard cover, reverse charging, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+,, fanless
Weight
576 g, Power Supply: 173 g
Price
580 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - 大型Android 平板电脑，可选哑光表面处理

小米 Pad 7S Pro 有四种颜色可供选择，每种颜色都采用磨砂后壳，这使得这款中端平板电脑具有很强的防指纹能力。得益于纤薄的边框，这款中端平板电脑的屏占比高达 87%。Apple iPad Air 13的屏占比仅为 86%。不过，Pad 7S Pro 并没有获得官方的 IP 认证。

小米Pad的铝合金一体成型设计给人留下了深刻印象，高度仅为5.8毫米，比 Pad 7 Pro.它的重量为 576 克，并不是市场上最轻的平板电脑之一，但类似尺寸的 Galaxy 平板电脑 S10 Plus其实也不轻。

12.5 英寸显示屏有两个版本。如果需要，你可以购买带有纳米软涂层的 Pad 7S Pro，这种涂层的表面结构经过蚀刻处理。这样做的目的是减少反光，提供类似纸张的书写体验。不过，我们的评测样品并没有这种防反光涂层。磨砂版采用康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃防刮花，而标准版则采用熊猫 X 金刚玻璃光面屏幕。

小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测

尺寸比较

❌
289.6 mm 209.6 mm 5.97 mm 675 g285.4 mm 185.4 mm 5.6 mm 571 g278.7 mm 191.58 mm 6.26 mm 590 g279.1 mm 191.9 mm 5.8 mm 576 g271.25 mm 182.53 mm 5.5 mm 508 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

功能 - 小米平板电脑提供视频输出

小米 Pad 7S Pro 共配备六个扬声器，支持手写笔、USB OTG 和蓝牙 5.4。内置 UFS 4.1 存储空间最大为 1 TB，不能通过 microSD 卡扩展。红外线发射器也扩展了功能集。这确保了这款中端平板电脑可用作兼容设备的遥控器。

根据型号的不同，您可以选择 8GB 或 12GB LPDDR5X 内存，最高版本甚至可以配备 16GB 内存（LPDDR5T）。为了实现快速数据传输，小米 Pad 支持带宽为 5 Gbps 的 USB-C 3.2（Gen 1），包括向外部显示器输出视频。另一个实用功能是可以通过背面的 pogo 针连接合适的键盘底座。

机箱上侧（麦克风、音量按钮、麦克风）
机箱上侧（麦克风、音量按钮、麦克风）
箱底侧
箱底侧
机箱左侧（开关按钮、扬声器）
机箱左侧（开关按钮、扬声器）
机箱右侧（扬声器、USB 接口、扬声器）
机箱右侧（扬声器、USB 接口、扬声器）

软件 - 可替代 iPad 的Android 15

小米 Pad 7S Pro 搭载了最新的Android 15，并在其上覆盖了制造商自制的 HyperOS 2.0 版本。在审查时，安全补丁截至 2025 年 7 月。小米尚未正式宣布中国版平板电脑的更新时间。不过，如果 Pad 7S Pro 在欧洲上市，它将受益于新的欧盟法规。该规定要求软件支持至少到2031年。

预装了谷歌框架，简化了通过内部应用商店安装谷歌Play商店的过程。这款中端平板电脑还支持作为 macOS 系统的第二屏幕使用，便于整合到Apple 生态系统中。不过，语言支持目前仅限于中文和英文。中文版不提供德语语言包。

小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测

可持续性

Pad 7S Pro 采用无塑料包装。我们无法找到有关所用材料或官方碳足迹的准确信息，因此很难评估该平板电脑的整体环境足迹。服务手册或用于 DIY 维修的备件也无法获得，这严重限制了最终用户的维修选择。

通信和 GNSS - 小米 Pad 7S Pro 缺乏 5G 和 GPS

小米 Pad 7S Pro 在家庭 Wi-Fi 使用方面采用了现代 WiFi 7 标准，但中国版本只能在 2.4 和 5 GHz 频段工作。6 GHz 频段不用于建立连接。在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 WiFi 6E 路由器进行的测试中，这款中端平板电脑的数据接收传输速度高达 1,500 Mbps 以上。不过，由于数据传输的波动，整体速度有些不稳定。

有一点值得批评，正如前面提到的 Pad 7 Pro的一个缺陷是，小米既不提供蜂窝选项，也不允许通过 GPS 或其他卫星系统进行定位跟踪。虽然 Pad 7S Pro 可以通过 Wi-Fi 和数字罗盘确定自己的位置，但这并不足以满足导航目的。

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
902 (min: 663) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1547 (min: 1136) MBit/s ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
994 (min: 974) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
956 (min: 844) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1759 (min: 1709) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1782 (min: 936) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1693 (min: 1456) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
768 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼68%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
787 (min: 615) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1002 (min: 910) MBit/s ∼89%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
953 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
778 (min: 542) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1070) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1437 (min: 1239) MBit/s ∼81%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
998 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1125 (min: 768) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1190 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1445 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼81%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
554 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
589 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1241 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1408 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼79%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø902 (663-1156)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1620 (1070-1792)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1547 (1136-1716)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (1239-1549)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø953 (870-981)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø776 (542-819)

摄像头 - 小米 Pad 7S Pro 配备单摄像头

与小米 Pad 7S Pro 自拍合影
与小米 Pad 7S Pro 自拍合影

对于大多数用户来说，屏幕对角线为 12.5 英寸的平板电脑上的摄像头肯定没有智能手机上的那么重要，但小米仍然使用了非常有用的 Omnivision 和三星传感器。这里使用了与 超极本.前置镜头分辨率为 3200 万像素，但只有固定焦距，录制的视频最高为 1080p。

主摄像头的 4K30 选项更令人印象深刻。在光线充足的情况下，5000 万像素的 ISOCELL JN1 传感器也能提供出色的照片，图像清晰度令人印象深刻。与目前的中端智能手机相比，Pad 7S Pro 的色彩还原也毫不逊色。 目前的中端智能手机相比.

如果你喜欢将笔记或脚本数字化，小米平板电脑和相机应用中的特殊文档模式是个不错的选择。

1x
1x
5x
5x
2x
2x
10倍（最大值）
10倍（最大值）
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Church Flower Low light
ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro: 6.13 ∆E min: 2.42 - max: 10.41 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
44 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro: 47.03 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.69 ∆E

配件和保修 -Android 平板电脑配有充电器

适用于小米 Pad 7S Pro 的触摸板键盘盖
适用于小米 Pad 7S Pro 的触摸板键盘盖

包装包括一个 120 瓦快速充电电源适配器和一条数据/充电线（USB-A 转 USB-C）。我们的设备贷方 Trading Shenzhen 还在中国版本的基础上增加了充电器的欧盟适配器和 USB OTG 适配器。

小米为这款中端平板电脑提供了 Focus Pen（约 100 美元）和 QWERTY 键盘保护套（约 170 美元）。

我们的进口设备有 12 个月的 保修.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以将智能手机寄往德国的收货地址。

输入设备和操作 - 支持手写笔的大型平板电脑

适用于小米 Pad 7S Pro 的对焦笔
适用于小米 Pad 7S Pro 的对焦笔

Pad 7S Pro 12.5 英寸液晶显示屏的精确输入给我们留下了深刻印象，其采样率高达 1,080 Hz。HyperOS 用户界面也得益于 144 Hz 的高刷新率，因此动画效果非常流畅。

对于手写笔记，可使用 15 克重的 Focus Pen，它能提供非常精细的输入，共有 8192 级压力。由于制造商规定的延迟时间仅为 3 毫秒，显示屏几乎可以瞬间作出反应，即使面对快速移动，屏幕也能精确地跟随笔尖移动。这支笔还支持手势控制，并配有一个实用的 "Spotlight "按钮，可用作遥控快门等。

集成在平板电脑左侧电源按钮中的主动式指纹传感器可确保安全解锁。使用食指即可轻松触及，而且工作可靠、快速。另外，Pad 7S Pro 还通过前置摄像头提供安全性较低的 2D 面部识别功能。

小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测
小米 Pad 7S ProAndroid 平板电脑评测

显示屏 - 小米采用了无 PWM 液晶显示屏

子像素排列图像
子像素排列图像

与普通 专业版Pad 7S Pro 的显示屏增大到 12.5 英寸，144 Hz 面板再次采用 3:2 宽高比。与 Tab 10+ 的 16:10 长宽比相比，它更偏向于经典的 DIN A4 纸张格式。 Galaxy Tab 10+相比，Tab 10+ 的纵横比为 16:10，更偏向于经典的 DIN A4 纸张格式，这样就能在浏览器或文本文档中显示更多内容。

12 位屏幕的分辨率为 3,200 x 2,136 像素，PPI 超过 300，对于大型平板电脑来说，清晰度令人满意。通过 APL18 样品（953 cd/m²），我们可以确认广告宣传的峰值亮度为 1,000 尼特。这确保了无 PWM 面板可提供生动的 HDR 效果。这款中端平板电脑支持 HDR 10、HDR Vivid 和 Dolby Vision 等多种标准。

835
cd/m²		849
cd/m²		876
cd/m²
853
cd/m²		888
cd/m²		869
cd/m²
843
cd/m²		853
cd/m²		877
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 888 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 860.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 888 cd/m²
Contrast: 3415:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
97.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.186
CCT: 6554 K
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
LCD, 3200x2136, 12.5"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2800x1752, 12.4"		OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
LTPS LCD, 3392x2400, 13.2"		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Tandem OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2"		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
IPS, 3048x2032, 12.4"
Screen
-89%
-51%
-13%
-70%
Brightness middle
888
471
-47%
691
-22%
1036
17%
867
-2%
Brightness
860
473
-45%
643
-25%
1039
21%
810
-6%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
87
-7%
94
0%
87
-7%
Black Level *
0.26
0.6
-131%
0.58
-123%
Contrast
3415
1152
-66%
1495
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
3.1
-210%
2.01
-101%
1.4
-40%
2
-100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.18
5.8
-166%
2.86
-31%
2.6
-19%
5.5
-152%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2.4
-71%
1.7
-21%
2.2
-57%
3
-114%
Gamma
2.186 101%
2.06 107%
2.193 100%
2.22 99%
2.29 96%
CCT
6554 99%
6746 96%
6615 98%
6829 95%
6957 93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

HyperOS 提供丰富的色彩显示选项。除了各种色彩配置文件外，还可以调整色温和色彩空间。我们使用 "高级"配置文件测量了单个色彩的最小差异。

我们使用分光光度计测量得出的黑阶较低，为 0.26 cd/m²，对比度约为 1:3500。不过，与 OLED 竞争产品相比Pad 7S Pro 的黑度没有那么深，在黑暗环境中背光造成的增亮效果也很明显。

色彩准确度（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩准确度（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：Adobe RGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：P3）
色彩空间（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：高级，目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
20.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 6.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22.3 ms rise
↘ 17.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32 ms).

小米 Pad 7S Pro 的液晶显示屏亮度很高，让人印象深刻，在户外也能轻松阅读。不过，我们测试的版本缺少纳米纹理涂层，在阳光直射下玻璃表面会出现恼人的反光。

可视角度的稳定性还不错，不过从平面角度观看时，显示屏会有轻微的黄色色调。液晶面板在显示全黑图像时通常会出现轻微混浊，但这在日常使用中几乎不成问题。

性能 - 小米 Pad 7S Pro 采用旗舰级 SoC

继 Pad 7 UltraPad 7S Pro 是小米第二款采用自主研发的 3 纳米 ARM 芯片的平板电脑。作为一款中端设备， XRing O1在 Geekbench 中的成绩非常好，尽管单核成绩明显低于 15S Pro的性能模式。在 Pad 7S Pro 中，XRing O1 XRing O1的 CPU 性能大致相当于 Dimensity 9400+在即将推出的Galaxy Tab S11+ 中，XRing O1 的 CPU 也有望达到 Dimensity 9400+ 的水平。

Geekbench 6.4 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark
Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3192 Points +20%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2667 - 2985, n=3)
2790 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
2667 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
2167 Points -19%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1924 Points -28%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1517 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=97, last 2 years)
1322 Points -50%
Multi-Core
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9273 Points +8%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (8563 - 9250, n=3)
8970 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
8563 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
7094 Points -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5176 Points -40%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
4812 Points -44%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=97, last 2 years)
4188 Points -51%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2834345 Points +17%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (2415643 - 2599957, n=3)
2500911 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
2415643 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1726681 Points -29%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1516127 Points -37%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
1049386 Points -57%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=63, last 2 years)
1029528 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
16960 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
16684 Points +9%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (15372 - 16503, n=3)
15774 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
15372 Points
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
14378 Points -6%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
HiSilicon Kirin T92, Maleoon 920, 12288
13822 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 27428, n=85, last 2 years)
11415 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (1873 - 2276, n=3)
2101 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
1873 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1342 Points -28%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1197 Points -36%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1153 Points -38%
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)
901 Points -52%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
11606 Points +26%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
10873 Points +18%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (9239 - 11988, n=3)
10868 Points +18%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
9239 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8483 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=68, last 2 years)
5287 Points -43%
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
15736 Points +27%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
15201 Points +23%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (12398 - 15799, n=3)
14532 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
12668 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
12398 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=68, last 2 years)
8438 Points -32%
Memory
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (11611 - 20652, n=3)
16433 Points +42%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
11611 Points
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11188 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
10633 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
10049 Points -13%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=68, last 2 years)
6171 Points -47%
Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
57192 Points +95%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
42432 Points +44%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
29401 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (28099 - 29401, n=3)
28634 Points -3%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
23041 Points -22%
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=68, last 2 years)
13407 Points -54%
Web
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (1791 - 2273, n=3)
2099 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
1938 Points +8%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1936 Points +8%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
1791 Points
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1766 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=68, last 2 years)
1415 Points -21%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
74821 Points +274%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (19983 - 23087, n=3)
21386 Points +7%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
19983 Points
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
17961 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14961 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=67, last 2 years)
13305 Points -33%
AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+, Immortalis-G720 MP12, 12288
54948 Points +2741%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=59, last 2 years)
7335 Points +279%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (1934 - 2087, n=3)
2001 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
1934 Points
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1284 Points -34%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1118 Points -42%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
718 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (n=1)
718 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet
  (229 - 1483, n=9, last 2 years)
638 Points -11%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
246 Points -66%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Tablet
  (230 - 9666, n=9, last 2 years)
2368 Points +228%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
721 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (n=1)
721 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
249 Points -65%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 13178, n=9, last 2 years)
3536 Points +136%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
1498 Points
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (n=1)
1498 Points 0%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
508 Points -66%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
12683 Points +2173%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=17, last 2 years)
2741 Points +391%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1
  (558 - 668, n=3)
612 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Xiaomi Xring O1, Immortalis-G925 MC16, 16384
558 Points

在图形性能方面，情况有所不同，因为 Immortalis-G925拥有 16 个内核，而不仅仅是 12 个着色器内核的 联发科竞争对手.得益于新增的 GPU 能力，Pad 7S Pro 甚至在 GFXBench 高要求的 4K 高阶基准测试中取得了 50fps 的优异成绩。与其 前代产品小米平板电脑在苛刻的图形测试中的每秒帧数几乎是前代产品的两倍。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6684 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6121 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5289 Points -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3088 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6672 Points +9%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6099 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5236 Points -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3421 Points -44%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25473 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
21162 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18352 Points -13%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12952 Points -39%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5750 Points -73%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11852 Points +25%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9463 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8132 Points -14%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4876 Points -48%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11944 Points +26%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
9451 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8201 Points -13%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4887 Points -48%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2543 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2421 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1894 Points -22%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
433 Points -82%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2574 Points +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2435 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1965 Points -19%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
437 Points -82%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
144 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
144 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -17%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -65%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
834 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
767 fps -8%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
765 fps -8%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
397 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
144 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -17%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps -17%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -65%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
521 fps +38%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
378 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
261 fps -31%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -34%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
111 fps
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -38%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -55%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
349 fps +17%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
298 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
219 fps -27%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -39%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78 fps +15%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
68 fps
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -26%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
42 fps -38%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
217 fps +28%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
169 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps -20%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
106 fps -37%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 fps
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -21%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -44%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
111 fps
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 fps -35%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -50%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
94 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps -3%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
56 fps -40%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps -47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -68%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
278 fps
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
259 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
176 fps -37%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
146 fps -47%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -74%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
50 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -30%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
26 fps -48%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -76%

Pad 7S Pro 在上网时表现出色。即使在复杂的网站上，等待时间也非常短，滚动也非常流畅。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - 2.2 Total Score
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (239 - 265, n=3)
253 Points +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro (Chrome 138)
239.432 Points
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 456, n=17, last 2 years)
209 Points -13%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
207.541 Points -13%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
17.1 runs/min +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro (Chrome 138)
16.4 runs/min
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (14.5 - 16.9, n=3)
15.9 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
15.2 runs/min -7%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=49, last 2 years)
13.9 runs/min -15%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
12.2 runs/min -26%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (182 - 198, n=3)
192 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
190 Points +4%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro (Chrome 138)
182 Points
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
179 Points -2%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
167 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=76, last 2 years)
122.7 Points -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (75849 - 81322, n=3)
79416 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro (Chrome 137)
75849 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
67938 Points -10%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
64638 Points -15%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
56978 Points -25%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=102, last 2 years)
36801 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=85, last 2 years)
3147 ms * -407%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 138)
654.9 ms * -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ (Chrome 130)
639.3 ms * -3%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro (Chrome 138)
621.12 ms *
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro (Chrome 125.0.6422.52)
602 ms * +3%
Average Xiaomi Xring O1 (502 - 621, n=3)
558 ms * +10%

* ... smaller is better

尽管价格中端，但小米采用了速度极快的 UFS 4.1 存储系统。因此，Pad 7S Pro 的 AndroBench 读写测试成绩非常出色。

Xiaomi Pad 7S ProSamsung Galaxy Tab S10+OnePlus Pad 2 ProHuawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025Xiaomi Pad 6S ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-44%
-18%
-19%
-9%
-6%
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
3954.61
3574.3
-10%
3864.83
-2%
2110.35
-47%
3465.72
-12%
3939 ?(3754 - 4110, n=9)
0%
1496 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=87, last 2 years)
-62%
Sequential Write 256KB
3334.83
554.67
-83%
3317.21
-1%
1988.5
-40%
3154.3
-5%
3487 ?(3095 - 3761, n=9)
5%
1091 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=87, last 2 years)
-67%
Random Read 4KB
423.91
218.43
-48%
303.59
-28%
340.83
-20%
381.97
-10%
362 ?(296 - 451, n=9)
-15%
223 ?(20.1 - 475, n=87, last 2 years)
-47%
Random Write 4KB
567.34
374.09
-34%
345.84
-39%
745.32
31%
510.95
-10%
495 ?(309 - 678, n=9)
-13%
239 ?(8.8 - 745, n=87, last 2 years)
-58%

游戏 -Android 具有游戏雄心的平板电脑

在游戏测试中，我们考察了小米平板电脑在当前 Play Store 游戏中的表现。使用GameBench软件，Pad 7S Pro 提供了稳定的帧速率，这意味着尽管液晶屏的响应时间有点慢，但它甚至可以满足游戏玩家的需求。特别是，Genshin Impact 演示了这款中端平板电脑可以轻松处理要求更高的游戏。即使在非常高的图形设置下，也能始终保持最高 60fps。我们在《PUBG Mobile》中也测得了 60 帧/秒，不过在低图形设置下，应该可以达到 120 帧/秒。由于平板电脑的 Immortalis G925 MP16在图形处理能力方面并不欠缺。

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.6 (54-62)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (56-60)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (55-62)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (39-41)

排放 - 小米 Pad 不会太热

温度

在我们的负载情况下，Pad 7S Pro 的温度明显升高。最高温度约为 42°C，但触感并不烫手。这款中端平板电脑的发热量是否会影响其性能，我们拭目以待。为此，我们使用了 3DMark 压力测试。

在所有负载情况下，XRing O1 XRing O1 只出现了轻微的帧速率下降。性能非常稳定，节流在 6% 到 10% 之间。

Max. Load
 35.8 °C36.6 °C41.3 °C 
 39.6 °C38.6 °C35.9 °C 
 34.9 °C39.8 °C36.7 °C 
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
42.1 °C39.6 °C39.7 °C
38.6 °C38.5 °C38.7 °C
39.8 °C35.9 °C35.6 °C
Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.4 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +8%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 % +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
92 %
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.9 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
63.2 % -31%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 % +3%
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.3 % +1%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
90.4 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.5 % -34%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.8 % +7%
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.6 % +3%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.2 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.1 % -30%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
Maleoon 920, Kirin T92, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.1 % +6%
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.6 %
OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
86.7 % -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
Immortalis-G720 MP12, Dimensity 9300+, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61.9 % -34%
0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø34.7 (33.6-37.2)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.9-19.5)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø108.9 (106.9-116.2)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.9 (63.3-68.9)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.5 (29.6-31.8)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø14 (14-14)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Immortalis-G925 MC16, Xiaomi Xring O1, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø17.3 (17.1-18.3)

发言人

说到音频，小米平板电脑拥有出色的立体声扬声器，包括杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）支持和多种蓝牙编解码器选择。四个低音扬声器和两个高音扬声器提供了轻微的低音和突出的中音。不过，粉红噪声的响应可以更线性一些。USB 端口也可用于有线音频。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.635.82538.141.83131.434.34034.336.35036.337.16329.227.68020.643.910022.756.812521.464.816021.568.320019.668.425016.169.431514.87440013.766.850016.87163022.278.880022.979.7100018.280.5125015.481.6160017.379.5200015.876.3250015.372.3315016.573400018.671.350002469630022.673.5800025.6771000021.577.21250023.1771600022.868.2SPL32.689N1.683.5median 19.6median 73.5Delta3.6539.940.332.436.428.131.431.337.329.34321.935.917.642.225.147.516.754.517.664.717.763.814.866.412.271.111.170.712.475.311.680.212.281.81480.912.879.212.879.612.87913.577.413.577.914.477.114.175.813.676.613.577.713.674.214.275.613.868.425.590.30.790.8median 13.6median 76.61.25.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 7S ProXiaomi Pad 6S Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 可快速充电的大型平板电脑

耗电量

Pad 7S Pro 配备 10,610 毫安时电池，可通过线缆以最大 120 瓦的功率充电。值得庆幸的是，包装盒中附带了一个足够快的充电器，但这款中端平板电脑也支持 PD3.0 快速充电协议。使用该公司的快速充电技术，充电时间约为 70 分钟。Pad 7S Pro 不支持无线充电，但可以用作 7.5 瓦的电源箱。

耗电量并不是特别高，不过超过 5 瓦的闲置功耗可能会更低一些。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.6 / 6.1 / 6.8 Watt
Load midlight 11 / 16.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
10610 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh		OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
12140 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
5050 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh		Average Xiaomi Xring O1
 		Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
18%
25%
72%
6%
26%
37%
Idle Minimum *
5.6
3.05
46%
3.8
32%
1.2
79%
1.22
78%
3.63 ?(0.8 - 5.6, n=3)
35%
1.993 ?(0.63 - 5.6, n=80, last 2 years)
64%
Idle Average *
6.1
4.57
25%
4.2
31%
1.99
67%
7.18
-18%
4.1 ?(1.4 - 6.1, n=3)
33%
3.71 ?(1 - 9.2, n=80, last 2 years)
39%
Idle Maximum *
6.8
4.65
32%
4.8
29%
2.05
70%
8.22
-21%
4.57 ?(1.7 - 6.8, n=3)
33%
4.05 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=80, last 2 years)
40%
Load Average *
11
13.35
-21%
10.2
7%
13.63
-24%
9.73 ?(6.3 - 11.9, n=3)
12%
9.26 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=77, last 2 years)
16%
Load Maximum *
16.8
15.55
7%
12.4
26%
14.56
13%
13.9 ?(9.1 - 16.8, n=3)
17%
12.8 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=77, last 2 years)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø13.3 (7.29-16.4)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.52 (3.33-15.8)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.17 (6.07-6.83)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.5-3.4)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.5)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12 (11.4-12.9)
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro Xiaomi Xring O1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø6.17 (6.07-6.83)
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.5-3.4)

电池运行时间

在我们的实际电池测试中，小米平板电脑的电池续航时间非常长，所有测试都是在将显示屏亮度调整为 150 cd/m² 的情况下进行的，因此具有很强的可比性。在 Wi-Fi 测试中，Pad 7S Pro 的续航时间接近 18.5 小时，而在关闭 Wi-Fi 模块的情况下，连续播放视频的续航时间略低于 16 小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
38h 38min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)
18h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 19min
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro
10610 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+
10090 mAh		OnePlus Pad 2 Pro
12140 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2025
5050 mAh		Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-55%
37%
-33%
-2%
Reader / Idle
2318
2793
20%
2565
11%
H.264
951
1463
54%
773
-19%
WiFi v1.3
1106
502
-55%
1420
28%
743
-33%
959
-13%
Load
199
289
45%
224
13%

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米 Pad 7S Pro 是一款出色的中端平板电脑，价格实惠，比上一代产品要好得多。

Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro - 08/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
58 / 69 → 84%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 87%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
55 / 65 → 85%
Application Performance
76 / 92 → 83%
AI Performance
45%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 94%
Camera
67 / 90 → 74%
Average
68%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
35%
Packaging
80%
Power Use
91.4%
Repairability
25%
Software Updates
50%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 46.9%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 速度极快的 12.6 英寸Android 顶级平板电脑 - 小米 Pad 7S Pro 评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-08-12 (Update: 2025-08-12)