超过 12,000 MB/s 的速度和石墨烯散热垫--TeamGroup T-Force Z540 固态硬盘游戏玩家和内容创作者评测

PCIe 5.0x4 SSD。

PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘的速度可能比其前身 PCIe 4.0 快得多。TeamGroup 给我们寄来了 2 TB 的 T-Force Z540 样品，额定连续读取速度高达 12,400 MB/s。因此，我们从 XMG Pro 16 上拆下固态硬盘，安装上 Z540，并检查硬盘是否兑现了承诺！
Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 10/06/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Benchmark Accessory Gadget Storage

结论 - 快速，但仅有图表还不够

TeamGroup T-Force Z540的惊人速度还达不到金士顿 Fury Renegade G5.即便如此，它的性能还是非常出色，固态硬盘的速度令人印象深刻。

不过，只有在确保适当散热的情况下才会如此。显然，PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘比其前代产品更热。仅靠石墨烯贴纸是不够的，尤其是在笔记本电脑的狭小空间里。由此产生的热量最初导致性能大幅下降。只有使用额外的散热垫并与笔记本电脑机箱接触，才能将热量散发出去，让 T-Force 充分发挥其速度潜力。石墨烯层是否能带来任何真正的好处，还是主要是一种营销噱头，在这次测试中还无法确定。

Pros

+ 传输速度极快

Cons

- 如果不采取额外的冷却措施，性能会急剧下降

价格和供应情况

我们测试的 2 TB 版本在亚马逊（德国）的售价约为232 欧元（约合 272 美元）。

$219.99

TEAMGROUP T-Force Z540 2TB DRAM SLC Cache 3D TLC NAND NVMe Phison E26 PCIe Gen5x4 M.2 2280 Gaming SSD with Ultra-Thin Graphene Heat Spreader Read/Write 12400/11800 MB/s TM8FF1002T0C129

结论 - 快速，但仅有图表还不够
包装和交货范围：纸板和塑料
测试系统 - XMG Pro 16 笔记本电脑
转账费率
结论

我们的固态硬盘排行榜目前由金士顿 Fury Renegade G5在我们的测试中，它的连续读写速度超过了 10,000 MB/s。Teamgroup 给我们寄来了他们最新的内部 PCIe 5x4 固态硬盘T-Force Z540。进行比较。我们测量了它是否有效。

	TeamGroup T-Force Z540
外形尺寸	M.2 (2280)
接口	PCIe 5.0 x4
内存	3D-NAND TLC
缓存	LPDDR4 4GB
控制器	Phison
重量	13 克
可用容量	1 TB、2 TB、4 TB
顺序读/写（制造商数据）	1 TB 读/写：高达 11,700/9,500 MB/s 2 TB 读/写：高达 12,400/11,800 MB/s 4 TB 读/写：高达 12,400/11,800 MB/s
IOPS	1,400,000 读取，1,400,000 写入
平均运行时间	1,700,000 小时
保修	5 年
制造商编号	TM8FF1002T0C129

包装和交货范围：纸板和塑料

TeamGroup 将 M.2 固态硬盘装在一个黑色小纸盒中，盒内有一个用于保护存储条的塑料盖。包装是可回收的，但似乎不是用回收材料制成的。
。

此外，还附带了一张非常薄的石墨烯散热贴纸，只需将其贴在固态硬盘的顶部即可。只需撕下保护膜，将贴纸尽量贴在组件的中心位置即可。

测试系统 - XMG Pro 16 笔记本电脑

由于要实现最高性能，需要一个支持 PCIe 5.0 x4 的 M.2 插槽，因此我们选择了当前的申克 XMG Pro 16进行测试。这台笔记本的主固态硬盘插槽支持现代标准，而副插槽不幸只能运行 PCIe 4.0。

因此，我们移除了笔记本的主内存，插入了 T-Force Z540。起初，我们没有使用 XMG 的散热板（通常通过额外的散热垫与机箱连接），而是完全依靠附带的石墨烯贴纸进行散热。

转账费率

1.不带 XMG 冷却板的测试

在没有冷却板的情况下，结果令人失望。只有在 CrystalDiskMark 6 和 9 中，连续读取速度才接近规定的潜力，而连续写入速度则相差甚远。
。

糟糕的连续性能：无论是否使用石墨烯冷却垫，如果不使用 XMG 冷却板，性能都会下降（红线）。

2.使用 XMG 冷却板进行测试

由于结果似乎不同寻常，我们重新安装了 XMG 冷却板，这样 T-Force 的热量就可以通过散热垫散失到笔记本电脑的底板上。

在第二次尝试中，结果看起来要好得多：根据 CrystalDiskMark 6，硬盘的读取和写入速度都达到了近 12,000 MB/s--这是一个令人印象深刻的结果。CrystalDiskMark 9 显示的数据甚至略高，而 AS SSD 则略显保守。

在我们使用 DiskSpd 进行的耐用性测试中，T-Force Z540 也始终保持着较高的性能。它的速度比不上金士顿 Fury Renegade G5的速度，但结果仍然非常出色

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 11994 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 12026 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 905 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 714 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 86.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 279 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 3178 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 3615 MB/s

Drive Performance rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance rating - Percent
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	93.9 pt
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	83.6 pt
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	79.8 pt
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	67.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	58.4 pt
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	36 pt
Global Average -3	25.3 pt
Average of class	25.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	7350 (7164.43^min - 7350.29^max) MB/s +113%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5359 (5332.25^min - 5358.62^max) MB/s +55%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	3458 (3451.49^min - 3458.41^max) MB/s
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3202 (3090.36^min - 3201.93^max) MB/s -7%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	2672 (2652.21^min - 2671.88^max) MB/s -23%
Global Average -3 (113.3 - 8300, n=1952)	2428 MB/s -30%
Average of class (113.3 - 8300, n=1952)	2428 MB/s -30%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	1609 (1589.43^min - 1608.94^max) MB/s -53%
seq write
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	10125 (10048.8^min - 10125^max) MB/s +6%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	9554 (9371.96^min - 9554.21^max) MB/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	9307 (5304.83^min - 9307.21^max) MB/s -3%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5094 (3418.23^min - 5094.49^max) MB/s -47%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	4147 (3521.83^min - 4147.33^max) MB/s -57%
Global Average -3 (43 - 10125, n=1952)	2507 MB/s -74%
Average of class (43 - 10125, n=1952)	2507 MB/s -74%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	1805 (559.8^min - 1804.81^max) MB/s -81%
seq q8 t1 read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	14590 (12770^min - 14590.3^max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	12505 (9384.86^min - 12505.3^max) MB/s +1%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	12345 (11208.8^min - 12344.5^max) MB/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	12029 (6621.31^min - 12029.1^max) MB/s -3%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	7125 (6471.6^min - 7125.49^max) MB/s -42%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	4985 (3750.97^min - 4984.83^max) MB/s -60%
Global Average -3 (114.5 - 16089, n=1952)	4212 MB/s -66%
Average of class (114.5 - 16089, n=1952)	4212 MB/s -66%
seq q8 t1 write
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	14206 (13728^min - 14205.9^max) MB/s +18%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	12006 (11685.5^min - 12006.2^max) MB/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	11581 (11375.7^min - 11581^max) MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	7451 (4926^min - 7450.54^max) MB/s -38%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	6507 (3381.66^min - 6507.24^max) MB/s -46%
Global Average -3 (46.7 - 14571, n=1952)	3198 MB/s -73%
Average of class (46.7 - 14571, n=1952)	3198 MB/s -73%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	1774 (801.95^min - 1773.98^max) MB/s -85%
4k q1 t1 read
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	95.9 (94.45^min - 95.94^max) MB/s +5%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	91.1 (89.98^min - 91.06^max) MB/s
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	89.4 (88.85^min - 89.35^max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	77.6 (25.64^min - 77.6^max) MB/s -15%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	69.4 (68.77^min - 69.4^max) MB/s -24%
Global Average -3 (0.67 - 361, n=1952)	58.8 MB/s -35%
Average of class (0.67 - 361, n=1952)	58.8 MB/s -35%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	42.6 (38^min - 42.59^max) MB/s -53%
4k q1 t1 write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	397 (385.91^min - 396.86^max) MB/s +47%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	341 (235.85^min - 340.94^max) MB/s +26%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	270 (256.05^min - 269.56^max) MB/s
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	256 (251^min - 256.11^max) MB/s -5%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	247 (243.12^min - 246.98^max) MB/s -9%
Global Average -3 (1.23 - 435, n=1951)	167 MB/s -38%
Average of class (1.23 - 435, n=1951)	167 MB/s -38%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	156.5 (155.62^min - 156.47^max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	8156 (8047.93^min - 8156.46^max) MB/s +15%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	7120 (7096.55^min - 7120.08^max) MB/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	6172 (6083.33^min - 6171.85^max) MB/s -13%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4242 (4201.86^min - 4241.55^max) MB/s -40%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	1757 (1433.31^min - 1757.34^max) MB/s -75%
Global Average -3 (1.03 - 8156, n=1951)	1449 MB/s -80%
Average of class (1.03 - 8156, n=1951)	1449 MB/s -80%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	979 (909.81^min - 979^max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	6280 (3941.51^min - 6280.29^max) MB/s +43%
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	4911 (4872.22^min - 4911^max) MB/s +11%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	4485 (4443.23^min - 4484.95^max) MB/s +2%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	4405 (4267.73^min - 4405.25^max) MB/s
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	1647 (552.25^min - 1646.66^max) MB/s -63%
Global Average -3 (1.5 - 6280, n=1951)	1235 MB/s -72%
Average of class (1.5 - 6280, n=1951)	1235 MB/s -72%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	563 (543.32^min - 563.01^max) MB/s -87%

AS SSD
Score Total
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	16295 Points +30%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	13854 Points +11%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	12534 Points
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	11741 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	8609 Points -31%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	4931 Points -61%
Global Average -3 (19 - 16295, n=3615)	3040 Points -76%
Average of class (19 - 16295, n=3615)	3040 Points -76%
Score Read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	6261 Points +43%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	4376 Points
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	4345 Points -1%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4266 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	1964 Points -55%
Global Average -3 (6 - 6261, n=3616)	1153 Points -74%
Average of class (6 - 6261, n=3616)	1153 Points -74%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	980 Points -78%
Score Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	7208 Points +22%
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	6844 Points +16%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	5906 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5809 Points -2%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5303 Points -10%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	3403 Points -42%
Global Average -3 (4 - 7208, n=3616)	1329 Points -77%
Average of class (4 - 7208, n=3616)	1329 Points -77%
Seq Read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	10753 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	9199 MB/s +2%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	8998 MB/s
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	7812.91 MB/s -13%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5738 MB/s -36%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	3370.3 MB/s -63%
Global Average -3 (193.2 - 12763, n=3833)	2111 MB/s -77%
Average of class (193.2 - 12763, n=3833)	2111 MB/s -77%
Seq Write
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	10950 MB/s +16%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	9485.67 MB/s 0%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	9456 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5793 MB/s -39%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	5664 MB/s -40%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	3950.72 MB/s -58%
Global Average -3 (52.2 - 11316, n=3836)	1435 MB/s -85%
Average of class (52.2 - 11316, n=3836)	1435 MB/s -85%
4K Read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	99.5 MB/s +21%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	89.1 MB/s +9%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	84.6 MB/s +3%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	81.9 MB/s
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	57.25 MB/s -30%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	49.2 MB/s -40%
Global Average -3 (6.08 - 314, n=3825)	43.3 MB/s -47%
Average of class (6.08 - 314, n=3825)	43.3 MB/s -47%
4K Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	350.79 MB/s +50%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	234 MB/s
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	230 MB/s -2%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	227 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	226 MB/s -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	153.8 MB/s -34%
Global Average -3 (13.3 - 512, n=3825)	116.6 MB/s -50%
Average of class (13.3 - 512, n=3825)	116.6 MB/s -50%
4K-64 Read
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	5086 MB/s +50%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	3607 MB/s +6%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	3474.56 MB/s +2%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	3395 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	995 MB/s -71%
Global Average -3 (13.1 - 5086, n=3824)	846 MB/s -75%
Average of class (13.1 - 5086, n=3824)	846 MB/s -75%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	585.92 MB/s -83%
4K-64 Write
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	5908.55 MB/s +25%
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	5519 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	5004 MB/s +6%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	4726 MB/s
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	4510 MB/s -5%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	2854.41 MB/s -40%
Global Average -3 (13.7 - 5909, n=3822)	1005 MB/s -79%
Average of class (13.7 - 5909, n=3822)	1005 MB/s -79%
Access Time Read
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	0.869 ms * -5012%
Global Average -3 (0.012 - 33, n=3755)	0.594 ms * -3394%
Average of class (0.012 - 33, n=3755)	0.594 ms * -3394%
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.09 ms * -429%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	0.02 ms * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.018 ms * -6%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	0.017 ms *
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	0.015 ms * +12%
Access Time Write
Global Average -3 (0.011 - 60.7, n=3798)	0.508 ms * -1273%
Average of class (0.011 - 60.7, n=3798)	0.508 ms * -1273%
Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB	0.1 ms * -170%
TeamGroup T-Force Z540	0.037 ms *
Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G	0.018 ms * +51%
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5	0.017 ms * +54%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB	0.016 ms * +57%
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600	0.013 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8

TeamGroup T-Force Z540 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12325 (11063.63-12364.82)

Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4 TB Kingston Fury Renegade G5; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø14176 (11971.77-14726.83)

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12251 (10175.58-12345.09)

Eurocom Raptor X17 Core i9-14900HX Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6127 (3845.97-12312.59)

SCHENKER XMG Pro 16 (E25) Samsung 9100 Pro 1 TB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø12031 (11057.44-12746.79)

AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Corsair MP600: Ø4810 (3161.04-4955.15)

Kingston KC3000 2 TB Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7097 (6084.05-7125.91)

结论

TeamGroup T-Force Z540 是一款速度极快的 PCIe 5.0x4 SSD。不过，不能完全依赖石墨烯散热垫，因为如果温度过高，性能就会大幅下降。

Back to the verdict

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.