Notebookcheck

小米11i智能手机评测。配备骁龙888的最实惠高端智能手机之一

几乎是一个小米11。 红米K40 Pro+以小米11i的名义来到欧洲,它在性能方面发挥了大作用。就像小米11系列的旗舰机一样,小米11i也采用了高端的骁龙888系统芯片。只是价格方面采取了不同的方向。小米11i的起价比装备非常相似的小米11低100欧元(约合117美元),而且趋势是急剧下降。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

小米目前的顶级智能手机可以在小米11系列中找到。它现在由五个设备组成。小米11 Ultra小米11 ,小米11i,小米11 Lite 5G ,以及 小米11 Lite 。在这篇评论中,我们将仔细看看最新加入的小米11i。这是小米在欧洲市场上提供红米K40 Pro+的名称。

虽然小米11 Ultra和小米11是小米11系列的旗舰设备,但小米11 Lite 5G和小米11 Lite型号并不十分强大或装备广泛,但它们是最便宜的回报。我们的小米11i测试机型排名高于小米11 Lite 5G。就性能而言,它与入门级机型没有共同之处,因为其性能与小米11相当。

就像小米11一样,小米11i也配备了快速的Snapdragon 888,并得到8GB LPDDR5内存的支持。然而,6.67英寸的小米11i比6.81英寸的顶级机型略小,其OLED显示屏2400x1080像素的分辨率也不是很高(小米11和小米11 Ultra:3200x1440像素)。作为回报,它也像所有非精简版机型一样,能做到120赫兹。还有一个来自三星的108万像素传感器和4520毫安时的电池。

小米11i目前在小米商店的价格为599欧元(约合704美元),因此比小米11的价格低100欧元(约合117美元),后者的价格为699欧元(约合821美元)。因此,当小米11与小米11i只在一些小细节上有区别时,为什么要花更多钱呢?此外,从性价比的角度来看,它甚至可能是最好的小米11智能手机。我们的评论将澄清是否如此。

Xiaomi Mi 11i (Mi 11 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 660
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 120 Hz, FHD , up to 1,300 nits, DCI-P3 100%, HDR10 , Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230.6 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, 360° ambient light sensor, color temperature sensor, barometer, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, X-axis linear motor, IR blaster, 2x2 MIMO, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1.800/1.900 MHz), 3G (B1/2/4/5/8), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/20/28/38/40/41/66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n41/n77/n78), head SAR 0.537 W/kg, body SAR 0.768 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 163.7 x 76.4
Battery
4520 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix triple camera: 108 MP (7p lens, 1/1.52" sensor size, f/1.75); 8 MP (f/2.2, FOV 119°); 5 MP (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected], [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2.45, videos up [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, 33-watt charger, USB-C cable, Type-C to 3.5 mm adapter, SIM tool, protective case, user guide, warranty info, MIUI 12.5, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
196 g, Power Supply: 86 g
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
08/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11i
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
86 %
05/2021
Asus ZenFone 8
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
169 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash5.92"2400x1080
87 %
04/2021
OnePlus 9
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
192 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86 %
08/2021
realme GT 5G
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
186 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
86 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
87 %
02/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"3200x1440

外壳 - 小米智能手机,带大猩猩玻璃5

在设计方面,小米11i只在细节上与同类产品有区别。小米11i还以其良好的制造质量脱颖而出。物理按键在机身上只有轻微的晃动,它们的手感和外壳一样优质,而且有一个很好的受力点。小米11i比小米11(163.7对164.3毫米)短一丁点,但它同样轻,只有198克,而且也有8毫米薄。

小米11i的显示屏由一层大猩猩5号玻璃保护。从小米11开始,小米使用大猩猩7号玻璃,也被称为 "Victus"。有趣的是,小米11 Lite 5G在这里也提供了更多的东西,因为它依靠大猩猩玻璃6。放在非常容易沾染指纹的后盖上的10800万像素相机模块是一个吸引人眼球的东西。无论外壳颜色如何,它都是黑色的,而且可以很容易地触摸到它,因为它从机身上突出了几毫米。主摄像头被一个银色的环所包围。

小米提供三种颜色的小米11i:"宇宙黑 "是我们的评测样品。其他颜色是 "天际银 "和 "冰霜白"。小米11i没有官方的IP认证,但小米11也没有。

Size comparison

164.3 mm 74.6 mm 8.06 mm 196 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g163.7 mm 76.4 mm 7.8 mm 196 g160 mm 74.2 mm 8.7 mm 192 g158.5 mm 73.3 mm 8.4 mm 186 g148 mm 68.5 mm 8.9 mm 169 g

连接性 - 高达256GB的存储空间,但没有microSD插槽

小米11i的基本配置是8GB的LPDDR5内存和128GB的UFS 3.1存储,在小米的网络商店售价为599欧元(约704美元)。第二个版本有256GB的存储空间,价格为699欧元(约821美元)。由于缺乏microSD插槽,存储空间无法扩展。

小米11i有一个OLED面板,具有常亮功能,但指纹传感器没有像小米11 ,而是集成在电源按钮上。USB-C端口仅以USB 2.0的速度运行,但它支持USB OTG,用于连接外围设备。

额外的功能是带有杜比全景声的双扬声器,以及Wi-Fi Direct和Miracast,以无线方式镜像内容。小米11i还支持DRM Widevine L1,因此也能以高清质量传输内容。

软件 -Android 11和MIUI 12的小米手机

小米11i运行Android 11操作系统,在测试时(8月中旬),其Android 安全补丁处于2021年7月的水平。与小米目前的智能手机阵容一样,MIUI 12.5作为用户界面。

除了谷歌的应用程序和制造商内部的三星工具,小米还在ROM中加入了八个第三方应用程序。例如,其中有亚马逊、Facebook和TikTok。不需要额外软件的用户可以轻松删除所有的软件。在我们的测试设备中,256GB的容量中约有230GB在全新设置后是免费的。

通信和GNSS - 快速的WLAN和精确的GPS

当涉及到WLAN连接时,由于Wi-Fi 6和2x2 MIMO技术,MI 11i的速度相当快。连接到我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk AX12,该智能手机在实践中也提供了非常有说服力的性能。与小米11 相比,小米11i在发送和接收数据时都实现了极其稳定的传输速率,如果你忽略了传输时的小幅下降。同时,它的速度是小米11的两倍多,发送数据的峰值速率为1,165 Mb/s,它只是刚刚被华硕ZenFone 8 。小米11i的数据接收速度为792Mb/s,并没有那么快,但与小米11的距离只是微不足道。

5G与X60调制解调器、双卡、蓝牙5.2和NFC--在其余的通信功能方面,小米11i与小米11没有区别。唯一的区别是,小米11在无线电频率方面不是很全面,但它涵盖了德国所有重要的频率,有15个LTE频段和11个5G频段。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1261 (1192min - 1327max) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1165 (735min - 1229max) MBit/s ∼92%
realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1164 (603min - 1211max) MBit/s ∼92% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s ∼70% -24%
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
685 (654min - 709max) MBit/s ∼54% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
519 (391min - 604max) MBit/s ∼41% -55%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=302, last 2 years)
438 MBit/s ∼35% -62%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ZenFone 8
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
903 (446min - 918max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
842 (329min - 976max) MBit/s ∼93% +6%
realme GT 5G
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
841 (768min - 888max) MBit/s ∼93% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
792 (676min - 856max) MBit/s ∼88%
OnePlus 9
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
777 (623min - 829max) MBit/s ∼86% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s ∼72% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=302, last 2 years)
436 MBit/s ∼48% -45%
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511706767137167487527577507817917997938088038228188438067928017988048018187978098568228138308156767137167487527577507817917997938088038228188438067928017988048018187978098568228138308151169121312048437351201120312051193120611941163121212221207118411901191118811881183118812011149117811951157116811871229Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø791 (676-856)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1165 (735-1229)
室内的GPS接收
室内的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收
室外的GPS接收

小米11i使用了一整套卫星导航系统来确定其位置。GPS(L1,L5)、GLONASS(L1)、Galileo(E1,E5a)、BeiDou(B1,B1C,B2a)以及日本的QZSS(L1,L5)和印度的NavIC(L5)。无论是在户外还是在室内,智能手机都能相当迅速地确定我们的位置,而且精确度高达3米。

当我们在移动时,准确度也保持很高。在一次大约十公里的自行车骑行中,Mi 11i实际上比Garmin Edge 500专业导航设备更准确地追踪我们的路线,而Garmin Edge 500则被带去做直接比较。

GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。摘要
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。湖泊
GPS测试。转折点
GPS测试。转折点

电话和通话质量 - 有VoLTE和VoWiFi

小米11i提供了良好的通话质量,在我们的测试中没有受到掉线或其他连接问题的影响。参与通话的用户在免提模式下也能很好地理解对方。此外,还支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。

相机 - 比小米11的三摄更弱

用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

小米11i的摄像头设置包括一个10800万像素的主摄像头,光圈为f/1.75,但与拥有同样高分辨率的小米11不同,它不提供任何光学图像稳定功能。小米11i没有使用小米11和小米11 Ultra中的三星HM3传感器,而是使用功能较弱的三星HM2。除了10800万像素的摄像头外,还有一个800万像素的超广角摄像头,f/2.2光圈,119°视野,以及一个500万像素的长焦微距摄像头。与小米11一样,前面有一个2000万像素的前置摄像头,可以拍出很好的自拍。

在默认设置下,小米11i使用9-in-1像素组合拍摄1200万像素的照片,在有利的照明条件下,它们看起来真的很好。然而,在专业模式下,全108MP也可用于拍摄照片。然而,与小米11相比,照片缺乏一点图像细节和动态。由于缺乏变焦镜头,远处的物体并没有被拍得很清晰。

当启用夜间模式时,低光照片看起来仍然相当不错。另一方面,超广角摄像头只是平均水平。虽然它提供了一个合格的图像质量,但它在边缘的模糊性方面很挣扎。主摄像头可以以每秒30帧的最大分辨率录制8K的视频,从而获得良好的图像质量。还支持HDR视频。

用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用自拍相机拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片
用主摄像头拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight - Scene 1Daylight - Scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo

我们在受控的照明条件下再次仔细观察该相机。这是在全影棚照明下进行的,然后在1勒克斯的照明下进行。

小米11i能很好地再现色彩,即使在低环境光下,相机软件也能确保与参考色彩的偏差不会太大。然而,即使在工作室的全照明下,这款智能手机也没有设法捕捉到特别鲜明的测试图表。

ColorChecker
15.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11i: 9.85 ∆E min: 2.17 - max: 22.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.6 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
59.2 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
30.7 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
60.3 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
68.1 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
42 ∆E
67.8 ∆E
65.9 ∆E
49.5 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Mi 11i: 42.55 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 68.12 ∆E

配件和保修 - 盒子里有33瓦的充电器

除了智能手机,小米11i的包装还包括一条USB线(Type-C转Type-A)、一个33瓦的充电器、一个耳机适配器(Type-C转3.5毫米)、一个SIM卡工具、一个透明保护套,以及一份快速入门指南和一张保修卡。

小米11i有12个月的保修期。

输入设备和处理 - Mi 11i中的360 Hz触摸采样率

你期望从配备Snapdragon 888SoC的智能手机上获得完全流畅的操作。而这正是你在小米11i上得到的东西。由于其SoC的强大功能,也由于其120赫兹的刷新率和360赫兹的触摸采样率,这款智能手机可以即时处理每一个输入,在日常使用中可以非常流畅地使用。很容易忽视这样一个事实:小米11的显示采样率是480赫兹,因为你几乎不会注意到真正的差异。

小米11i可以使用指纹或面部识别进行生物识别解锁。指纹传感器位于电源按钮中,它的得分不仅是由于其非常高的识别率,而且主要是由于其速度。一旦你把手指放在上面,智能手机几乎立即就能解锁。使用前置摄像头的人脸识别功能也能可靠地工作,但其安全性不如指纹认证。

横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘

显示器 - AMOLED面板,1,200 cd/m²

子像素网格
子像素网格

小米11i的6.67英寸AMOLED面板的分辨率为2400x1080像素,与提供3200x1440像素的6.81英寸小米11,还不是很清晰。然而,这两块面板在亮度方面不相上下。刷新率也是如此,它可以在显示设置中设置为60或120赫兹。

在纯白色背景下,我们测量到小米11i的平均亮度几乎为880cd/m²。在均匀分布的明亮和黑暗图像区域(APL50),亮度甚至达到了令人尊敬的1201 cd/m²。这些是显示HDR内容的最佳条件--小米11支持HDR10+。当亮度传感器关闭时,小米11i仍能达到最大484 cd/m²。在最低亮度水平下,我们测量到2.73cd/m²。

小米使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制,范围从162.6到500赫兹。当显示屏亮度为62%或更高时,PWM闪烁保持在120赫兹。

863
cd/m²
884
cd/m²
891
cd/m²
865
cd/m²
875
cd/m²
893
cd/m²
866
cd/m²
877
cd/m²
895
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 895 cd/m² Average: 878.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.73 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 875 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
96.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi Mi 11i
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Asus ZenFone 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 5.92
OnePlus 9
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
realme GT 5G
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 11
LED DotDisplay, 3200x1440, 6.81
Screen
-13%
30%
11%
29%
19%
Brightness middle
875
758
-13%
731
-16%
605
-31%
889
2%
840
-4%
Brightness
879
759
-14%
739
-16%
606
-31%
902
3%
845
-4%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
96
0%
97
1%
95
-1%
98
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.5
-94%
0.59
67%
1.3
28%
0.9
50%
1.2
33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.7
1.3
72%
3.1
34%
1.9
60%
2.7
43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.4
1.6
53%
0.9
74%
1.3
62%
1.3
62%
2
41%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.23 99%
2.243 98%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.26 97%
CCT
6220 105%
6527 100%
6573 99%
6372 102%
6614 98%
6492 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 64 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 64 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15324 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

分光光度计和CalMAN软件显示,小米11i不仅能够在显示亮度方面得分,而且它还能管理非常平衡的色彩再现。这在使用 "原色 "色彩配置文件时最为准确。在sRGB色彩空间中,颜色(DeltaE 1.8)和灰度(DeltaE 3.4)的DeltaE偏差非常低,以至于肉眼无法发现与参考色的任何差异。色温和RGB平衡也都很好,因为在显示器上检测不到任何色差。

色彩准确性("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩准确性("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩空间("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
灰度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。
色彩饱和度("原色 "色彩方案,sRGB目标色彩空间)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

由于其高亮度率,小米11i可以在户外使用得非常好。即使在阳光直射下,显示屏上的内容仍然比较容易阅读。

室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(阳光直射)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。
室外使用(在阴凉处)。

小米11i的AMOLED面板提供了高视角的稳定性。即使在非常平坦的视角下,内容仍然完全可读。作为AMOLED显示屏的典型,有时可以看到轻微的绿色或蓝色色调,但这并不影响可读性。

视角
视角

性能--搭载骁龙888的小米智能手机

与小米11的两款顶级机型一样,小米11小米11 Ultra ,小米11i也配备了高通公司的高端骁龙888芯片组。由Adreno 660图形芯片支持的八核SoC是目前最快的智能手机CPU之一,它在测试中也能提供相应的基准测试结果。

然而,正如小米11已经出现的情况一样,在小米11i中并不总是容易获得高通SoC的全部潜力,因为它在长时间的负载中迅速开始节流,以保护自己不过热。不过,在日常使用中,你不会注意到内部发生的温度问题,因为尽管时钟频率较低,但仍有足够的功率。

如果你在各个基准测试之间给骁龙888足够的时间来冷却,你会得到顶级性能的回报。因此,小米11i在合成测试中与高端对手如华硕ZenFone 8realme GT 5G ,它们也使用骁龙888。虽然与小米Poco F3及其骁龙870的差距是可以衡量的,但在实践中几乎看不出来。在浏览器基准测试中,小米11i甚至一直领先,这可能是由于较新的浏览器版本。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1134 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1124 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1124 Points ∼99% -1%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1132 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1136 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=20)
1120 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=247, last 2 years)
579 Points ∼51% -49%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3687 Points ∼97%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
3385 Points ∼89% -8%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3653 Points ∼97% -1%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3379 Points ∼89% -8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points ∼89% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3784 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=20)
3600 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=247, last 2 years)
1984 Points ∼52% -46%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4273 Points ∼74%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5771 Points ∼100% +35%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3894 Points ∼67% -9%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4620 Points ∼80% +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points ∼62% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4279 Points ∼74% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=19)
4796 Points ∼83% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=142, last 2 years)
2182 Points ∼38% -49%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4403 Points ∼94%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4676 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4566 Points ∼98% +4%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4658 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points ∼77% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4674 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4764, n=19)
4577 Points ∼98% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=145, last 2 years)
2253 Points ∼48% -49%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15024 Points ∼91%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
16428 Points ∼100% +9%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14457 Points ∼88% -4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points ∼83% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11705 - 17085, n=14)
14724 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=61, last 2 years)
9924 Points ∼60% -34%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
13282 Points ∼100%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
10438 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12440 Points ∼94% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12876 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10231 - 15027, n=9)
12332 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=259, last 2 years)
7935 Points ∼60% -40%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7991 - 9221, n=3)
8422 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3456 Points ∼41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10111 - 13263, n=3)
11212 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4051 Points ∼36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4462 - 4609, n=3)
4556 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2795 Points ∼61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8783 Points ∼80%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
10379 Points ∼94% +18%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11018 Points ∼100% +25%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points ∼72% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8257 - 11302, n=15)
10026 Points ∼91% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4153 Points ∼38% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15110 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
15652 Points ∼93% +4%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
16863 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points ∼71% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=15)
14739 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5258 Points ∼31% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3562 Points ∼72%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4763 Points ∼96% +34%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4978 Points ∼100% +40%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points ∼73% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3562 - 5344, n=15)
4792 Points ∼96% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2991 Points ∼60% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6140 - 7596, n=2)
6868 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2653 Points ∼39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6816 - 9436, n=2)
8126 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2806 Points ∼35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (4514 - 4557, n=2)
4536 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2827 Points ∼62%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7270 Points ∼78%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
8779 Points ∼94% +21%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
0 Points ∼0% -100%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8987 Points ∼96% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points ∼79% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9343 Points ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=16)
8738 Points ∼94% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3371 Points ∼36% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
11406 Points ∼90%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
11552 Points ∼91% +1%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12714 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points ∼75% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12023 Points ∼95% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=16)
11691 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3806 Points ∼30% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3204 Points ∼61%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
4771 Points ∼91% +49%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
4436 Points ∼85% +38%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points ∼79% +29%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5249 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=16)
4723 Points ∼90% +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3036 Points ∼58% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=214, last 2 years)
2623 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=214, last 2 years)
2938 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
Points ∼0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=214, last 2 years)
2648 Points ∼100%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5692 Points ∼96%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5767 Points ∼97% +1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5786 Points ∼97% +2%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5942 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points ∼72% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5599 Points ∼94% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=19)
5646 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=106, last 2 years)
2825 Points ∼48% -50%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5712 Points ∼96%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
5821 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5751 Points ∼97% +1%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5925 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points ∼72% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5678 Points ∼96% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=19)
5600 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 8672, n=102, last 2 years)
2934 Points ∼50% -49%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1503 Points ∼96%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1528 Points ∼98% +2%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1559 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points ∼78% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1236 - 1559, n=14)
1506 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=53, last 2 years)
889 Points ∼57% -41%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1427 Points ∼92%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1512 Points ∼97% +6%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1555 Points ∼100% +9%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points ∼79% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (997 - 1555, n=14)
1429 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=51, last 2 years)
893 Points ∼57% -37%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
121 fps ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
119 fps ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
61 fps ∼50% -50%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=14)
102 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
59.3 fps ∼49% -51%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
266 fps ∼97%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
238 fps ∼87% -11%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
275 fps ∼100% +3%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼97% +1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps ∼73% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
268 fps ∼97% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 290, n=14)
251 fps ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 319, n=218, last 2 years)
108 fps ∼39% -59%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
120 fps ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
116 fps ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼50% -50%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
91 fps ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 120, n=14)
90.9 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
46.7 fps ∼39% -61%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
151 fps ∼93%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
152 fps ∼94% +1%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
101 fps ∼62% -33%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
162 fps ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼73% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
158 fps ∼98% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=14)
144 fps ∼89% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
63 fps ∼39% -58%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
96 fps ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
93 fps ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼59% -41%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼63% -37%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=14)
71.9 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
36.5 fps ∼38% -62%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
110 fps ∼92%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
105 fps ∼88% -5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
96 fps ∼81% -13%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
119 fps ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps ∼68% -26%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
111 fps ∼93% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=14)
101 fps ∼85% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
43.3 fps ∼36% -61%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
53 fps ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
48 fps ∼80% -20%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
33 fps ∼55% -45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=14)
45.4 fps ∼76% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 61, n=213, last 2 years)
22.6 fps ∼38% -62%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
64 fps ∼89%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
61 fps ∼85% -5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼58% -34%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
72 fps ∼100% +13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼67% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
67 fps ∼93% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=14)
60.4 fps ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
26 fps ∼36% -59%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
57 fps ∼95% -5%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
58 fps ∼97% -3%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
59 fps ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
41 fps ∼68% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=19)
55.6 fps ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)
23 fps ∼38% -62%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
68 fps ∼86%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
64 fps ∼81% -6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼72% -16%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
71 fps ∼90% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps ∼72% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=20)
71.7 fps ∼91% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)
26.5 fps ∼34% -61%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
42 fps ∼95%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
41 fps ∼93% -2%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
41 fps ∼93% -2%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps ∼75% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
25 fps ∼57% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=19)
37.4 fps ∼85% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)
15.1 fps ∼34% -64%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
27 fps ∼93%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
26 fps ∼90% -4%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼97% +4%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
28 fps ∼97% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps ∼76% -19%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
29 fps ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=19)
27.9 fps ∼96% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=283, last 2 years)
10.4 fps ∼36% -61%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
791672 Points ∼98%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
795730 Points ∼98% +1%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
811533 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points ∼84% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (636471 - 815441, n=11)
779868 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=48, last 2 years)
482716 Points ∼59% -39%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
687402 Points ∼96%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
713309 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
595585 Points ∼83% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
700592 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (569595 - 740847, n=11)
683568 Points ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=194, last 2 years)
336734 Points ∼47% -51%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
258869 Points ∼98%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
263702 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points ∼42% -57%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
209984 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (171404 - 264766, n=10)
237952 Points ∼90% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=74, last 2 years)
64854 Points ∼25% -75%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6852 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6043 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6537 Points ∼95% -5%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6031 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6361 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5908 - 6959, n=14)
6517 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=203, last 2 years)
3710 Points ∼54% -46%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10610 Points ∼91%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
9973 Points ∼86% -6%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11627 Points ∼100% +10%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10443 Points ∼90% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points ∼86% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
10377 Points ∼89% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=14)
10885 Points ∼94% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=203, last 2 years)
6771 Points ∼58% -36%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
7677 Points ∼87%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
6300 Points ∼72% -18%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
7526 Points ∼86% -2%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
5352 Points ∼61% -30%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points ∼88% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
8789 Points ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=14)
7467 Points ∼85% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=203, last 2 years)
4378 Points ∼50% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14427 Points ∼94%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
13167 Points ∼86% -9%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12938 Points ∼84% -10%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
15346 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points ∼83% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12732 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15628, n=14)
13427 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15628, n=203, last 2 years)
5757 Points ∼38% -60%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 11i
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1876 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 16384
1612 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1627 Points ∼87% -13%
realme GT 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1543 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 11
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1434 Points ∼76% -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=14)
1690 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=203, last 2 years)
1279 Points ∼68% -32%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
115.735 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (61.3 - 116, n=9)
91.7 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
83.152 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
75.089 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
61.34 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=185, last 2 years)
49.6 Points ∼43% -57%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
209.12 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
184.49 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (119 - 210, n=13)
164 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
137.89 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
119.23 Points ∼57% -43%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
118.55 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points ∼50% -50%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=197, last 2 years)
89.5 Points ∼43% -57%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
113.1 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (54.7 - 114, n=9)
84 runs/min ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
74.8 runs/min ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
62.8 runs/min ∼56% -44%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
54.65 runs/min ∼48% -52%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=170, last 2 years)
49 runs/min ∼43% -57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
166 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
149 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 166, n=13)
140 Points ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
124 Points ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 9 (MS Edge)
119 Points ∼72% -28%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
105 Points ∼63% -37%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=205, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼47% -53%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
45398 Points ∼100%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
37926 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 46075, n=14)
34017 Points ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
27539 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points ∼59% -41%
OnePlus 9 (Chrome89)
23843 Points ∼53% -47%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
23491 Points ∼52% -48%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=212, last 2 years)
17665 Points ∼39% -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=214, last 2 years)
3913 ms * ∼100% -324%
realme GT 5G (Chrome 91)
1841.4 ms * ∼47% -99%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1743.8 ms * ∼45% -89%
Xiaomi Mi 11 (Chrome 88)
1721.5 ms * ∼44% -86%
OnePlus 9 (Chrome89)
1692.34 ms * ∼43% -83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (924 - 1841, n=14)
1400 ms * ∼36% -52%
Asus ZenFone 8 (Chrome 90)
1397.2 ms * ∼36% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 11i (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
923.6 ms * ∼24%

* ... smaller is better

配备了快速的UFS 3.1存储,小米11i在读取和写入基准中表现不错,但仍然没有达到其竞争对手的性能。尽管读取性能非常好,但写入性能和4KB的随机读/写并没有接近小米11的,即使在反复运行Androbench之后。也就是说,系统性能仍然是一流的。

Xiaomi Mi 11iAsus ZenFone 8OnePlus 9realme GT 5GXiaomi Poco F3Xiaomi Mi 11Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
36%
21%
3%
2%
33%
29%
-38%
Sequential Read 256KB
1627.84
1781.44
9%
1872.3
15%
1587.31
-2%
1378.12
-15%
1614.92
-1%
1753 (1330 - 2037, n=23)
8%
783 (41.9 - 2037, n=291, last 2 years)
-52%
Sequential Write 256KB
552.4
767.3
39%
739.39
34%
575.05
4%
684.13
24%
754.41
37%
797 (552 - 1321, n=23)
44%
348 (11.9 - 1321, n=291, last 2 years)
-37%
Random Read 4KB
181.01
292.27
61%
225.38
25%
198.72
10%
208.02
15%
278.54
54%
251 (181 - 325, n=23)
39%
140 (13.5 - 325, n=291, last 2 years)
-23%
Random Write 4KB
205.89
272.92
33%
221.45
8%
208.42
1%
170.57
-17%
289.32
41%
257 (196 - 330, n=23)
25%
126 (5.2 - 330, n=291, last 2 years)
-39%

游戏 - Adreno 660提供流畅的游戏

不用说,游戏在小米11i上运行得很流畅。然而,我们从Play Store中的一小部分也表明,这款智能手机并不总是能够利用其120赫兹显示屏。在《PUBG Mobile》(高清设置)和《Armajet》中,每秒只有30帧,但帧率只在非常少的情况下低于这个值。总的来说,小米11i似乎比小米11 更加限制帧率,后者在PUBG Mobile以及其他游戏中能达到60帧。

尽管如此,小米11i仍然为游戏玩家提供了很好的服务,这不仅仅是由于其高端Adreno 660GPU。360赫兹的触摸采样率也有助于增加乐趣,而两侧的两个Dolby Atmos扬声器则提供了良好的音效。

我们用Gamebench工具测量游戏帧率。

氩氦刀
氩氦刀
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
0510152025303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303030313030303130303031303030313030303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303130313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303031303030313030303130303031303030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030303130303031303030313030313031293129312931293129312931293031293129312931243130303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030302931293130303030303030303030303030293129303030303030303030303030312931293030303030303031293030303030303030303030303031293129303030303030303030303030303129312931293129303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.60.13: Ø30.2 (30-31)
; PUBG Mobile; 1.5.0: Ø30 (24-31)

排放 - 小米11i有节流功能

温度

在使用过程中,小米11i的表面发热到40.1°C(约47°F),但只有当你像我们一样对它进行一个小时的压力测试时才会如此。然而,即使如此,它也不会有不舒服的感觉。在实践中,表面温度通常应该更低,但在较长时间的游戏过程中肯定可以达到。

我们不能提供关于骁龙888温度行为的确切信息,因为小米11i在这里变成了不合作的对象。3DMark Wild Life压力测试以智能手机过热的通知戛然而止。GFXBench的电池测试一开始看起来更好。T-Rex和曼哈顿的测试场景运行平稳,但GFXBench在显示结果之前立即崩溃,没有通知。

Max. Load
 39.2 °C39 °C36.2 °C 
 39.5 °C39.1 °C36.2 °C 
 38.2 °C37.9 °C35.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.5 °C
Average: 37.9 °C
34.9 °C37.1 °C40.1 °C
34.1 °C37.1 °C39 °C
32.6 °C36.9 °C36.4 °C
Maximum: 40.1 °C
Average: 36.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  29.5 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

发言人

就像小米11一样,小米11i的立体声扬声器位于顶部和底部。不过,与兄弟姐妹机型相比,它们不是由哈曼卡顿公司调校的,但它们支持杜比全景声,提供的声音质量与Mi 11 。虽然几乎没有任何低音,但中音和高音的回报非常线性。

小米11i没有音频插孔。然而,耳机和外部扬声器可以使用附带的3.5毫米适配器插入智能手机的USB-C端口。无线方面,可以通过蓝牙5.2连接。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.4362527.531.23121.125.54023.923.75033.230.36320.320.38021.621.410025.525.712517.734.916018.25020015.547.525015.353.831517.659.440015.759.750016.665.363014.96980015.272.710001674.8125015.277.5160015.377.8200014.774.7250015.176.6315015.778.4400014.777.8500014.874.4630014.873.3800015.470.21000014.574.21250014.568.21600013.864.8SPL27.487.5N0.971.1median 15.3median 70.2Delta1.19.72634.528.328.623.329.224.328.833.936.422.527.722.525.923.925.617.23719.948.916.548.613.350.917.656.82055.919.66623.268.613.270.712.672.412.674.91473.512.776.512.777.513.278.613.774.613.773.913.974.113.473.31474.614.768.815.763.227.386.80.967.5median 14median 70.72.79.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Mi 11iXiaomi Mi 11
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Mi 11i audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 11 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 不到一小时就能完全充电

能源消耗

小米11i不是很耗电,比小米11 ,运行起来更节能,这可能是由于后者的AMOLED显示屏分辨率更高。

附带的33瓦电源适配器为智能手机快速充电。在测试中,电池水平从0%到80%只需要36分钟,而充满电需要52分钟。与小米11不同,我们目前的小米手机不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.98 / 1.4 / 1.46 Watt
Load midlight 6.21 / 9.62 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Mi 11i
4520 mAh
Asus ZenFone 8
4000 mAh
OnePlus 9
4500 mAh
realme GT 5G
4500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F3
4520 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 11
4600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
24%
-20%
-5%
13%
-31%
-5%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
0.98
0.82
16%
0.9
8%
1.14
-16%
0.76
22%
1.57
-60%
1.055 (0.46 - 1.8, n=18)
-8%
0.953 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Average *
1.4
1.1
21%
1.7
-21%
1.84
-31%
1.29
8%
1.92
-37%
1.531 (0.74 - 2.6, n=18)
-9%
1.812 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
1.46
1.16
21%
2.7
-85%
1.87
-28%
1.45
1%
1.94
-33%
1.706 (0.78 - 3.1, n=18)
-17%
2.06 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-41%
Load Average *
6.21
4.24
32%
5.4
13%
4.21
32%
4.6
26%
6.32
-2%
5.5 (4.21 - 6.44, n=18)
11%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
29%
Load Maximum *
9.62
6.83
29%
11.1
-15%
8.07
16%
8.87
8%
11.65
-21%
9.84 (5.89 - 11.7, n=18)
-2%
7.28 (3.68 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789104.714.824.684.691.311.1964.361.214.414.824.84.771.3261.2014.721.3194.991.213.241.3584.031.1994.241.2035.795.865.811.2343.921.2627.067.275.114.381.2855.281.461.291.2735.495.073.441.5271.3045.565.655.455.425.511.2195.65.71.2424.341.6561.3269.118.919.779.369.039.499.269.849.239.319.69.231.2719.359.579.381.3485.619.219.138.969.199.081.2478.971.2268.982.034.928.598.511.2691.338.558.588.441.2498.296.661.3168.221.2678.014.738.417.211.268.321.4467.188.218.593.291.5088.538.51.3398.578.058.048.058.052.666.091.5987.128.036.798.038.018.038.047.198.026.858.038.011.2834.974.925.27.638.048.058.047.657.991.3687.794.664.794.624.514.514.521.4414.652.784.144.285.084.651.6422.674.091.5182.452.591.884.911.4385.021.7815.715.835.871.8263.151.7035.117.357.214.881.7261.8165.425.422.421.8915.195.365.452.992.074.665.65.865.775.331.6655.255.741.7072.743.493.58.678.529.138.838.678.948.749.518.878.759.148.968.944.489.319.446.961.5615.929.148.498.969.152.674.788.117.339.512.028.59.743.649.481.8289.689.588.061.6869.725.034.349.441.7179.299.241.7459.877.292.679.781.6719.689.559.462.175.339.523.139.869.319.819.169.67.862.143.574.389.889.589.849.8710.810.410.210.29.4210.110.22.014.895.25.210.210.11010.19.6210.21.6899.8Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11i Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø5.49 (1.196-9.84)
realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G: Ø6.16 (1.438-10.8)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789107.847.867.797.927.937.917.917.937.927.927.927.97.927.917.97.687.597.67.627.647.597.597.667.67.637.687.787.717.687.727.677.687.647.667.687.717.627.657.727.667.687.697.617.637.447.577.687.657.667.717.677.657.657.647.637.657.627.647.737.697.667.696.138.259.599.539.499.649.5910.410.710.69.599.539.679.649.569.629.699.699.759.589.629.749.799.729.669.659.739.749.789.699.669.649.719.729.749.749.79.779.739.749.749.729.729.739.689.656.548.448.438.448.438.468.518.458.468.468.458.468.498.468.458.448.488.518.487.847.867.797.927.937.917.917.937.927.927.927.97.927.917.97.687.597.67.627.647.597.597.667.67.637.687.787.717.687.727.677.687.647.667.687.717.627.657.727.667.687.697.617.637.447.577.687.657.667.717.677.657.657.647.637.657.627.647.737.697.667.696.138.259.599.539.499.649.5910.410.710.69.599.539.679.649.569.629.699.699.759.589.629.749.799.729.669.659.739.749.789.699.669.649.719.729.749.749.79.779.739.749.749.729.729.739.689.656.548.448.438.448.438.468.518.458.468.468.458.468.498.468.458.448.488.518.481.1771.1261.1281.9121.1221.1461.1281.1121.2371.0581.0151.0161.011.1171.00310.9890.9771.0331.0681.0011.0451.0311.0181.0111.0131.011.0050.9840.9841.0240.9860.9811.0421.0310.9821.0011.0591.0181.010.9691.051.1241.1811.1691.1731.2151.0930.9961.0511.0241.0241.0071.0621.0620.9880.9921.0141.0641.0231.4681.5921.4791.3971.5411.6771.5951.4521.4791.5981.3921.6081.5511.661.6231.4821.8151.4621.5131.4331.451.6511.4961.5571.5571.5311.5591.4911.4561.4561.6371.5171.4251.511.5981.3971.6571.4621.5931.4451.3641.6151.6791.3781.4811.3941.5161.4771.371.471.4931.391.4881.3961.481.4941.7211.5611.3151.6711.4041.7811.561.3581.4131.648Tooltip
Xiaomi Mi 11i Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.69 (6.13-7.93)
realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.3 (6.54-10.7)
Xiaomi Mi 11i Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.065 (0.969-1.912)
realme GT 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G; Idle 1min: Ø1.518 (1.315-1.815)

电池寿命

模拟网页浏览11:30小时,视频播放近17小时,小米11i实现了良好的电池运行时间,略高于小米11 。对应机型的电池容量确实更大一些,但这一优势被主要的耗电因素所抵消,即更高分辨率的显示屏。小米Poco F3与小米11i相比,实现了类似的良好电池寿命。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
27h 38min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)