vivo V23 5G评测--拥有奢华色彩的自拍智能手机

Name: Vivo V23 5G
Brand: Vivo

不仅仅是为美女。 vivo V23 5G主要是想用其双前置摄像头来说服人，它有一个强大的50MP传感器。然而，背面的三摄像头也很有希望。此外，还有一个明亮的AMOLED，现代通信模块和快速充电。

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/15/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Vivo Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Vivo V23 5G (V20 Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 920 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G68 MP4, Core: 950 MHz

Memory

12 GB

, LPDDR4x

Display

6.44 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 409 PPI, Capacitive, 10 multitouch points, 180 Hz touch sampling rate, AMOLED, anti-glare glass, Schott Xensation Up, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 230.96 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, e-compass, OTG

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.55 x 157.2 x 72.42

Battery

4200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (S5KGW1, f/1.89, 25 mm, PDAF) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 16 mm, 120°, 1/4.0", 1.12 µm) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4, 4 cm); Camera2-API: Full
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (S5KJNV, f/2.0, 23 mm, PDAF) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, 18 mm, 105°, f/2.28)

Additional features

Keyboard: Onscreen, 44W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-A to Type-C), Silicon Bumper, SIM-Tool, Audio-Jack-Adapter, Headset (3.5 mm), Funtouch OS 12, 24 Months Warranty, Body-SAR: 1.00 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.82 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), BeiDou (B1), SBAS; ClearKey 1.2, DRM Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

181 g

Price

549 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
83.6 %	06/2022	Vivo V23 5G Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4	181 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.44"	2400x1080
87.4 %	12/2021	Google Pixel 6 Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	207 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
88.8 %	02/2022	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	177 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080
88.1 %	03/2022	Xiaomi 12X SD 870, Adreno 650	176 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080

外壳和功能 - Vivo V23 5G的别致色彩渐变

Vivo V23 5G有阳光金和星尘黑两种颜色。前者也是我们的测试设备，其背面可以在紫外光下改变颜色。略微闪亮的金色随后变成了浓郁的绿松石色。它的两面还受到肖特Xensation Up玻璃的保护。

制造质量很好，背面的哑光玻璃不容易沾染指纹。然而，这并不适用于高度抛光的铝制框架，其特点是有角度的设计。

设备清单相当短。USB端口只能按照2.0标准工作，既没有microSD插槽，也没有音频插孔。无线充电也不被支持。

尺寸比较

通信、软件和操作 - Vivo V23配备5G和Wi-Fi 6

Vivo V23使用Wi-Fi 6模块，与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000相结合，可以实现高度和稳定的数据传输。蜂窝调制解调器涵盖所有现代标准，并提供广泛的频段。

vivo智能手机还在两个方向上提供良好的语音质量。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。vivo还在系统中直接实现了SIP账户管理。

谷歌的Android 12被用作操作系统，制造商在上面洒上了自己的用户界面Funtouch OS 12。与中国使用的较新的Origin OS相比，它看起来没有那么现代。在测试时，安全补丁在2022年5月1日已经更新。

电容式触摸屏对输入的反应迅速而可靠，屏幕在出厂时还覆盖了一层保护膜。下面的肖特玻璃更滑，触觉上非常舒服。生物识别安全由显示屏下方的光学指纹扫描仪提供，它的工作非常可靠，但当智能手机从待机状态解锁时，速度相对较慢。当显示屏处于激活状态时，这一过程明显加快。

Networking
Vivo V23 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	919 (min: 468) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	914 (min: 456) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 6 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AX12	802 (min: 421) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	895 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	737 (min: 358) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	855 (min: 649) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi 12X 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	745 (min: 391) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	736 (min: 644) MBit/s ∼81%

Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (456-930)

Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø734 (644-826)

Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, ARM Mali-G68 MP4; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (468-942)

Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø732 (391-809)

摄像头 - 前置双光学系统，带闪光灯

vivo V23 5G的明星是在前面。5000万像素的主传感器不仅有自动对焦功能，而且还有一个额外的超广角镜头。两个LED点也应该确保任何时候都有完美的照明。这使得在日常使用中可以获得非常好的自拍，在逆光下通过自动HDR模式也能成功。vivo还提供了许多过滤器和效果。不幸的是，视频只能以30FPS的超高清或60FPS的全高清录制。更多的是不可能用SoC。

背面的主摄像头原来比平均水平要好。由于显示屏太亮，色彩再现并不总是自然。尽管如此，照片缺乏亮度，动态范围应该更大。超广角显示景深较浅，微距镜头的分辨率只有200万像素。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

显示屏 - Vivo智能手机采用90赫兹OLED技术

Vivo V23 5G的6.44英寸AMOLED显示屏的刷新率高达90赫兹。它既可以设置为60或90赫兹，也可以在这两种模式之间自动切换。

在启用环境光传感器的情况下，亮度值很好，但那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人只有299cd/m²可用。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布（APL18），亮度增加到792 cd/m²。这是相当明亮的，但在这个价格范围内，有一些竞争对手有更多的储备。

像其他采用OLED面板的智能手机一样，vivo V23使用PWM来调节亮度。在最低亮度时，频率范围在119和373.2赫兹之间。在可调亮度的54%以上，根据设定的刷新率，只有60或90赫兹是可测量的。


603 cd/m²	603 cd/m²	602 cd/m²
609 cd/m²	606 cd/m²	606 cd/m²
614 cd/m²	608 cd/m²	603 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 614 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 606 cd/m² Minimum: 2.27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 606 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24

	Vivo V23 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.44	Google Pixel 6 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.40	Xiaomi 12X OLED, 2400x1080, 6.28
Response Times		-71%	-113%	51%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2.688 ?(1.328, 1.36)	6.8 ?(3.6, 3.2) -153%	10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2) -287%	0.777 ?(0.385, 0.392) 71%
Response Time Black / White *	2.04 ?(1.062, 0.9775)	3.2 ?(2, 1.2) -57%	2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2) -18%	1.204 ?(0.584, 0.62) 41%
PWM Frequency	373.2	367.6 ?(100) -2%	247.5 -34%	523 40%
Screen		24%	17%	43%
Brightness middle	606	805 33%	758 25%	910 50%
Brightness	606	805 33%	758 25%	908 50%
Brightness Distribution	98	98 0%	99 1%	97 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.3	1.4 39%	1.5 35%	0.8 65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.8	3.7 53%	3.1 60%	1.8 77%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.8 -13%	2.3 -44%	1.3 19%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.29 ^96%	2.06 ^107%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6632 ^98%	6507 ^100%	6378 ^102%	6414 ^101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-24% / -7%	-48% / -26%	47% / 46%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.062 ms rise
2.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.9775 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.688 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.328 ms rise
2.688 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.36 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

373.2 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 373.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 373.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

性能、排放和电池寿命

vivo V23 5G采用的是联发科Dimensity 920然而，这与它的前任几乎没有什么区别 Dimensity 900不同。从纸面上看，只有两个Cortex-A78性能核心的时钟分别增加了100MHz。联发科承诺将游戏性能提高9%，但vivo并没有能够把这一点说出来。用GameBench的测试甚至显示在Armajet中只有30FPS。然而，智能手机的温度发展是不明显的，无论是表面还是SoC。

下巴上的扬声器可以变得非常响亮，但只能提供一个平庸的质量，其特点是外观空洞。然而，当vivo智能手机不设置太大声时，声音是相当好的。V23没有插孔，但可以通过USB-C输出声音。蓝牙可以无线使用，支持所有常见的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+和LDAC）。

在WLAN测试中，4200毫安时的强大电池为手机提供了近15个小时的能量，并调整了显示亮度（150cd/m²），尽管面板以90赫兹持续工作。因此，V23的装备很适合长时间使用。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	737 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1041 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	1092 Points +48%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1000 Points +36%
Oppo Find X5 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	745 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 (737 - 814, n=2)	776 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)	913 Points +24%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	2149 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	2805 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	3204 Points +49%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3377 Points +57%
Oppo Find X5 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	2266 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 (2046 - 2149, n=2)	2098 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)	2996 Points +39%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	7124 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	10409 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	14107 Points +98%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	11778 Points +65%
Oppo Find X5 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	10863 Points +52%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 (7124 - 10740, n=2)	8932 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)	11787 Points +65%

BaseMark OS II - Overall (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	3849 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6287 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	5839 Points +52%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	5551 Points +44%
Oppo Find X5 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	4567 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 ()	3849 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +50%

CrossMark - Overall (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	617 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	849 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	871 Points +41%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	719 Points +17%
Oppo Find X5 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	497 Points -19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 ()	617 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)	837 Points +36%

AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	43526 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	5723 Points -87%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	Points -100%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	123847 Points +185%
Oppo Find X5 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192	41356 Points -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 ()	43526 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 139804, n=50, last 2 years)	21146 Points -51%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI (sort by value)
Vivo V23 5G MediaTek Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4, 12288	23618 Points
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	28581 Points +21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 (21981 - 23618, n=2)	22800 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)	21814 Points -8%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2549 Points +307%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2418 Points +286%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1567 Points +150%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1532 Points +144%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	627 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	621 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2604 Points +304%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2586 Points +302%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1629 Points +153%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1538 Points +139%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	644 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	605 Points -6%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10185 Points +348%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9782 Points +330%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6483 Points +185%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5824 Points +156%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2275 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2012 Points -12%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10062 Points +334%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9713 Points +319%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6351 Points +174%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5818 Points +151%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2319 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2045 Points -12%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3209 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2776 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4359 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4054 Points -7%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4037 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3675 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5087 Points +33%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4771 Points +24%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4303 Points +12%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3837 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3121 Points -19%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19364 Points +342%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18286 Points +317%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12752 Points +191%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4383 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4043 Points -8%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11528 Points +171%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10618 Points +150%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9553 Points +125%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4249 Points
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3843 Points -10%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +49%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +47%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	81 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps -26%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	428 fps +304%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	306 fps +189%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	106 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	101 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +105%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +102%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	54 fps -8%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	213 fps +213%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps +132%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	68 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	62 fps -9%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +210%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps +179%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps -8%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	164 fps +273%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +170%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	44 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -5%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +268%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +209%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -9%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +231%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps +200%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps -4%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +306%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +253%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +253%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps +141%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -12%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps +327%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +282%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +255%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps +173%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	10 fps -9%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +277%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93 fps +258%
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps +242%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65 fps +150%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -12%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nubia RedMagic 7 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	123 fps +310%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +237%
Xiaomi 12 Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps +230%
Asus ROG Phone 5s Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps +170%
Vivo V23 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 920, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps
Oppo Find X5 Lite Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps -10%

	Vivo V23 5G	Google Pixel 6	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G	Xiaomi 12X	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-13%	32%	49%	9%	54%
Sequential Read 256KB	994.44	1546 55%	1639 65%	1732 74%	892 ?(482 - 1009, n=22) -10%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 52%
Sequential Write 256KB	497.9	233.4 -53%	760 53%	795 60%	690 ?(369 - 913, n=22) 39%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 125%
Random Read 4KB	219.19	126.2 -42%	245.1 12%	291.9 33%	219 ?(99.7 - 291, n=22) 0%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 13%
Random Write 4KB	214.81	190.3 -11%	211.2 -2%	279.9 30%	230 ?(99.2 - 301, n=22) 7%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 27%

Games

Vivo V23 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø30 (29-31)

Vivo V23 5G; Dead Trigger 2; 1.8.16: Ø69 (35-86)

Vivo V23 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.0.0: Ø59.5 (56-61)

Vivo V23 5G; PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.0.0: Ø39.8 (38-41)

Vivo V23 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.0.0: Ø39.8 (35-41)

温度

Max. Load

Idle


30.6 °C	30.5 °C	28.9 °C
30.8 °C	30.6 °C	29.1 °C
29.7 °C	30.8 °C	29.6 °C

Maximum: 30.8 °C
Average: 30.1 °C


28.7 °C	30.1 °C	30.3 °C
28.5 °C	29.7 °C	30.4 °C
28.4 °C	30.1 °C	30.3 °C

Maximum: 30.4 °C
Average: 29.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25.9 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Vivo V23 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi 12X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

	Vivo V23 5G 4200 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G 4500 mAh	Xiaomi 12X 4500 mAh	Average of class Smartphone
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing	887	627 -29%	594 -33%	1028 16%	914 ?(424 - 2844, n=228, last 2 years) 3%

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 100)		14h 47min

Pros

+ 强大的前置摄像头设置与双LED

+ 电池运行时间长

+ 色彩准确的90 Hz AMOLED

Cons

- 主摄像头的附加镜头较弱

- 平庸的扬声器

- 不支持microSD

评语 - 奢华的设计和良好的电池运行时间

vivo V23 5G以其非凡的外观令人信服，特别是在金色的变体中。那些喜欢更庄重的外观的人可以选择黑色的型号。vivo专注于自拍，并为该智能手机提供了强大的解决方案，在测试中令人信服。两个前置LED灯可以使用不同的色温，不仅用于增亮，也用于图像合成。

凭借强大的前置摄像头和长的电池运行时间，vivo V23 5G赢得了消费者的青睐。

显示屏也很好，显示出准确的色彩再现以及高亮度。然而，即使在便宜的设备中，后者有时也会更高，这可能会产生积极的影响，特别是在户外使用时。安装的联发科SoC提供了良好的系统性能，尽管在测试中不时可以看到停顿。

然而，考虑到高昂的价格，我们本以为至少会有一个更高级的功能。不管是无线充电还是IP认证。主摄像头也可以配备更好的附加镜头。

对于自拍，在这个价格范围内不会有一个智能手机能像vivo V23 5G一样好。更强的计算能力和更强大的相机是Pixel 6的特点之一。像素6或小米12X.

价格和可用性

vivo V23 5G的建议零售价为549欧元（约549美元）。在测试的时候，它最便宜的是Amazon它在Cyberport的价格稍高一些

Vivo V23 5G - 2022-08-30 08/30/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

52 / 70 → 74%

Weight

90%

Battery

90%

Display

90%

Games Performance

45 / 64 → 70%

Application Performance

74 / 86 → 86%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

61%

Average

78%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > vivo V23 5G评测--拥有奢华色彩的自拍智能手机

Daniel Schmidt, 2022-06-15 (Update: 2022-06-15)

vivo V23 5G评测--拥有奢华色彩的自拍智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和功能 - Vivo V23 5G的别致色彩渐变

尺寸比较

通信、软件和操作 - Vivo V23配备5G和Wi-Fi 6

摄像头 - 前置双光学系统，带闪光灯

显示屏 - Vivo智能手机采用90赫兹OLED技术

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能、排放和电池寿命

Games

温度

演讲者

Vivo V23 5G audio analysis

Xiaomi 12X audio analysis

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语 - 奢华的设计和良好的电池运行时间

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare