Notebookcheck Logo

realme Narzo 50A Prime智能手机评测--全高清和快速内存,价格低廉

锐利而廉价。 高分辨率显示屏,主摄像头有很多像素,以及快速存储 - realme Narzo 50A Prime提供了很多小钱。至少在纸面上,这款智能手机看起来很有希望,但当然,我们想在我们的测试中确定。
Android ARM Smartphone
realme Narzo 50A Prime
realme Narzo 50A Prime (Narzo Series)
Processor
UNISOC T612 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, 180Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 164.4 x 75.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, monochrome (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @720p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.910W/​kg (head), 1.274W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
192.5 g
Price
170 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
76 %
08/2022
realme Narzo 50A Prime
T612, Mali-G52 MP1
192.5 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
74.8 %
07/2022
realme Narzo 50i Prime
T612, Mali-G52 MP1
182 g32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"1600x720
75.8 %
07/2022
Samsung Galaxy M13
Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1
192 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.60"2408x1080
76.6 %
07/2022
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.71"1650x720

案例和特点 - 棱角分明的外观

realme 50A Prime是 realme Narzo 50i Prime我们最近测试了它。两款设备的尺寸非常相似,但realme将Narzo 50A Prime的厚度减少了十分之几毫米;重量稍高,为192.5克。

看看这些特征,很快就会发现Narzo 50A Prime是这个家族中装备明显更好的手机:64GB大容量存储,全高清显示屏和WiFi 5,它显然高于 Narzo 50i Prime.然而,仍然缺少的是NFC,所以也不能使用移动支付应用程序。

SD卡读卡器是在两个SIM卡插槽之外的,事实证明它比同类智能手机要慢一些,例如,在用我们的参考卡Angelbird AV Pro V60进行的复制测试中。

它的外壳和Narzo 50i Prime一样是 50i Prime一样,相当有棱角。背面覆盖着反光玻璃板,下面有一个 "凯夫拉速度纹理设计",这让人想起碳纤维,但当然是由简单的塑料制成。相机模块周围的区域在视觉上是分离的,并折射光线以达到特殊效果。有趣的是,"闪光黑 "的颜色看起来相当深蓝;浅蓝色可作为第二种颜色的变体。

就其价格范围而言,这款智能手机看起来很优质,但它强烈地吸引着指纹。边缘部分相当明显,但Narzo 50A Prime的手感仍然相当舒适。这款智能手机几乎不可能被扭曲,也不会吱吱作响。

realme Narzo 50A Prime
realme Narzo 50A Prime
realme Narzo 50A Prime
realme Narzo 50A Prime
realme Narzo 50A Prime
realme Narzo 50A Prime

尺寸比较

169.6 mm 76.6 mm 8.3 mm 190 g165.4 mm 76.9 mm 8.4 mm 192 g164.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 182 g164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 192.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
  (Angelbird V60)
34.9 MB/s ∼100% +87%
Samsung Galaxy M13
  (Angelbird V60)
28.5 MB/s ∼82% +52%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=99, last 2 years)
26.3 MB/s ∼75% +41%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
  (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s ∼59% +10%
realme Narzo 50A Prime
  (Angelbird V60)
18.7 MB/s ∼54%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (20.7-48.6)
realme Narzo 50i Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.9 (21.1-40.1)
Samsung Galaxy M13 Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31 (18.9-38.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.4-46.1)
realme Narzo 50A Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.4 (28.2-83.5)
realme Narzo 50i Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T612, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.3 (31.8-83.1)
Samsung Galaxy M13 Mali-G52 MP1, Exynos 850, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø49.7 (31.5-53.6)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.7 (28.6-82.6)

通信、软件和操作 - 没有5G,但有快速WLAN

在这个价格范围内,你必须没有5G功能,但Narzo 50A Prime至少提供一些4G频率。这对全球范围内的国际使用来说是不够的,但你可以在中欧使用移动互联网而没有问题。在我们的测试中,接收效果相当低,但从未完全中断。

这款手机配备了WiFi 5,因此可以与同价位的其他手机竞争,如 Galaxy M13红米10C.在我们与参考路由器华硕ROG AXE11000的测试中,传输速率也相当稳定。

Realme的UI R版在某些功能上有所减少,例如,没有游戏模式。Narzo 50A Prime的系统仍然基于Android 11,尽管Android 13已经在起步阶段。我们的测试设备在测试期间收到了2022年7月的最新安全补丁的更新,尽管之前已经安装了2022年6月的相当新的补丁。因此,Realme似乎至少将其更新迅速带到了手机上。

触摸屏可以可靠地操作,但由于60赫兹的帧率,它感觉不如更快的屏幕流畅。指纹传感器被整合到外壳右侧的待机按钮上。即使在待机状态下,它也能相当迅速和可靠地解锁手机。二维人脸识别也是可能的,但你应该确保周围环境光线良好。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
realme Narzo 50A Prime
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (317min - 366max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy M13
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
328 (286min - 348max) MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (269min - 336max) MBit/s ∼90% -10%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
802.11 b/g/n
62.6 (58min - 74max) MBit/s ∼18% -82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy M13
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
325 (301min - 333max) MBit/s ∼100% +25%
realme Narzo 50A Prime
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
259 (196min - 267max) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
222 (194min - 242max) MBit/s ∼68% -14%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
802.11 b/g/n
44.3 (22min - 58max) MBit/s ∼14% -83%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø259 (196-267)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (317-366)

摄像机 - 实际上是一台摄像机

自拍,前置摄像头
自拍,前置摄像头

从纸面上看,真正的Narzo 50A Prime在背面提供了三个相机镜头,但实际上,你可能在大多数时候只使用其中的一个:拥有5000万像素的主摄像头通常只能拍摄分辨率为四分之一的照片,但仍然比例如只有200万像素分辨率的微距相机要准确得多。当然,对于粗略地看一眼手机屏幕来说,这已经足够了,但除此之外,极端的特写镜头几乎没有用。第三个镜头只是为了支持模糊效果,反正不能用于自己的照片。

主摄像头本身拍摄的照片相当合格,其细节锐度一点也不差。同时,周围图像的色彩再现相当奇怪:天空看起来严重不饱和,大面积的颗粒感相当强。在光线很暗的情况下,在黑暗区域几乎看不到任何细节。

视频最多能以1080p和30帧的速度录制,而且只能使用数码变焦。测光表的工作相当准确,而自动对焦则需要时不时地设置一下正确的焦点。

前置摄像头的分辨率为800万像素。在光线良好的情况下,它可以拍出合格的自拍照,但你不应该把它们放大太多,否则会失去细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
ColorChecker
14.8 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
ColorChecker realme Narzo 50A Prime: 10.07 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 17.71 ∆E
ColorChecker
28.7 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
51.8 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
52.3 ∆E
55.6 ∆E
24 ∆E
40.4 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
50.9 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
41 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
48 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker realme Narzo 50A Prime: 37.21 ∆E min: 14.04 - max: 55.56 ∆E

显示屏 - 全高清,亮度好

子像素结构
子像素结构

这个价格范围内的其他手机也提供全高清屏幕,但到目前为止还不是所有的手机。realme Narzo 50A Prime的显示屏平均亮度为528 cd/m²,也相当明亮,并提供1385:1的体面对比度,这使得颜色和暗色调看起来更丰富和更深。

我们没有注意到任何PWM的闪烁,但在灰阶中可以看到轻微的蓝色偏移。色彩精确度测量显示,蓝色调的显示最不准确。

514
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
528
cd/m²
521
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
506
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
516
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 544 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 523.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 540 cd/m²
Contrast: 1385:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.39 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.261
realme Narzo 50A Prime
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
realme Narzo 50i Prime
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Samsung Galaxy M13
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.71
Response Times
-25%
5%
-30%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30 ?(16, 14)
34 ?(19, 15)
-13%
27 ?(14, 13)
10%
33 ?(17, 16)
-10%
Response Time Black / White *
14 ?(9, 5)
19 ?(9.5, 9.5)
-36%
14 ?(9, 5)
-0%
21 ?(9, 12)
-50%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-22%
-13%
15%
Brightness middle
540
365
-32%
481
-11%
511
-5%
Brightness
523
354
-32%
444
-15%
478
-9%
Brightness Distribution
93
83
-11%
85
-9%
84
-10%
Black Level *
0.39
0.45
-15%
0.43
-10%
0.42
-8%
Contrast
1385
811
-41%
1119
-19%
1217
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.39
4.58
-4%
4.55
-4%
1.51
66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.65
8.81
-32%
7.86
-18%
2.53
62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.7
5.2
-11%
5.5
-17%
2.9
38%
Gamma
2.261 97%
2.28 96%
2.233 99%
2.266 97%
CCT
7597 86%
7929 82%
7969 82%
6443 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -23%
-4% / -9%
-8% / 6%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命--快速内存发挥了作用

这款手机 Unisoc Tiger T612在许多realme的低价手机中使用,为该级别提供了良好的性能,特别是在处理器方面。同时,图形单元有点落后,特别是在高分辨率的屏幕上。只要你没有太多的应用程序在后台运行,该系统在日常使用中基本上是平稳运行的。然而,你必须考虑到偶尔的停顿。

快速的UFS 2.2存储在这个价格范围内不再是完全不常见的,而 红米10C例如,红米10C也提供这种功能。尽管如此,很高兴看到即使是廉价的手机现在也提供了一个体面的存储速度,缩短了加载时间。

即使在重载的情况下,外壳的加热情况也非常好,至少在室温下,最高温度为38.4℃,并不令人震惊。

手机下边缘的小型单声道扬声器在产生真正完整的声音方面有些吃力。对于大多数音乐和电影声音的需求来说,它听起来太单薄,高音太重。尽管如此,你基本上可以用它来听一段音乐或看一段视频。然而,通过3.5毫米端口或蓝牙连接的扬声器或耳机的声音自然更好;支持aptX HD,但不支持现代aptX编解码。

这款手机可以用最大18瓦的功率充电,但realme Narzo 50A Prime不包括充电器。在完全充电的情况下,需要2个小时才能完全充满5000毫安时的电池。根据我们的WLAN测试,它不能像这个价格范围内的其他手机那样持续很长时间,但它仍然是一个长跑运动员,14:34小时,甚至可以在不充电的情况下度过两个工作日。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
346 Points ∼51%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
347 Points ∼51% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
119 Points ∼17% -66%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
377 Points ∼55% +9%
Average UNISOC T612
  (346 - 347, n=3)
346 Points ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=269, last 2 years)
684 Points ∼100% +98%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1311 Points ∼59%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1326 Points ∼60% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
519 Points ∼23% -60%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1644 Points ∼74% +25%
Average UNISOC T612
  (1311 - 1326, n=3)
1320 Points ∼59% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=269, last 2 years)
2225 Points ∼100% +70%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
7610 Points ∼75%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
7705 Points ∼75% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4894 Points ∼48% -36%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5884 Points ∼58% -23%
Average UNISOC T612
  (7610 - 7776, n=3)
7697 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼100% +34%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
979 Points ∼40%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
997 Points ∼40% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
887 Points ∼36% -9%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1353 Points ∼55% +38%
Average UNISOC T612
  (979 - 997, n=3)
988 Points ∼40% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=184, last 2 years)
2477 Points ∼100% +153%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
826 Points ∼32%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
841 Points ∼33% +2%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
768 Points ∼30% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points ∼46% +42%
Average UNISOC T612
  (826 - 841, n=3)
834 Points ∼33% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=184, last 2 years)
2549 Points ∼100% +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2773 Points ∼97%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2858 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
1930 Points ∼67% -30%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2831 Points ∼99% +2%
Average UNISOC T612
  (2773 - 2858, n=3)
2821 Points ∼98% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5262, n=184, last 2 years)
2865 Points ∼100% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
986 Points ∼24%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
987 Points ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
920 Points ∼23% -7%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points ∼33% +37%
Average UNISOC T612
  (986 - 988, n=3)
987 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=244, last 2 years)
4085 Points ∼100% +314%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
829 Points ∼16%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
830 Points ∼16% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
793 Points ∼15% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1175 Points ∼23% +42%
Average UNISOC T612
  (829 - 830, n=3)
829 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=244, last 2 years)
5216 Points ∼100% +529%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2909 Points ∼89%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2940 Points ∼90% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2084 Points ∼64% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2825 Points ∼87% -3%
Average UNISOC T612
  (2909 - 2990, n=3)
2946 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=244, last 2 years)
3263 Points ∼100% +12%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
411 Points ∼13%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
415 Points ∼13% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
507 Points ∼16% +23%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points ∼15% +9%
Average UNISOC T612
  (411 - 415, n=3)
412 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=201, last 2 years)
3085 Points ∼100% +651%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
410 Points ∼12%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
410 Points ∼12% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
509 Points ∼15% +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
438 Points ∼13% +7%
Average UNISOC T612
  (410 - 410, n=3)
410 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=206, last 2 years)
3404 Points ∼100% +730%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
115 Points ∼12%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
114 Points ∼12% -1%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
139 Points ∼14% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points ∼12% +6%
Average UNISOC T612
  (114 - 117, n=3)
115.3 Points ∼12% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=163, last 2 years)
991 Points ∼100% +762%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
111 Points ∼11%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
111 Points ∼11% 0%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
139 Points ∼14% +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points ∼12% +10%
Average UNISOC T612
  (111 - 111, n=3)
111 Points ∼11% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=158, last 2 years)
980 Points ∼100% +783%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
4.7 fps ∼16%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
10 fps ∼34% +113%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.3 fps ∼18% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps ∼58% +262%
Average UNISOC T612
  (4.7 - 10, n=3)
8.23 fps ∼28% +75%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=264, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼100% +526%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
5.4 fps ∼15%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps ∼15% -2%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼17% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.5 fps ∼27% +76%
Average UNISOC T612
  (5.3 - 5.4, n=3)
5.33 fps ∼15% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=265, last 2 years)
35.2 fps ∼100% +552%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3 fps ∼15%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
6.4 fps ∼31% +113%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
3.3 fps ∼16% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
10 fps ∼49% +233%
Average UNISOC T612
  (3 - 6.4, n=3)
5.27 fps ∼26% +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 69, n=265, last 2 years)
20.4 fps ∼100% +580%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
realme Narzo 50A Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2 fps ∼15%
realme Narzo 50i Prime
UNISOC T612, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps ∼14% -5%
Samsung Galaxy M13
Samsung Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼16% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps ∼24% +60%
Average UNISOC T612
  (1.9 - 2, n=3)
1.933 fps ∼14% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=265, last 2 years)
13.4 fps ∼100% +570%
realme Narzo 50A Primerealme Narzo 50i PrimeSamsung Galaxy M13Xiaomi Redmi 10CAverage 64 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
11%
-63%
19%
0%
24%
Sequential Read 256KB
852.8
658.2
-23%
264.5
-69%
927.7
9%
831 ?(511 - 928, n=7)
-3%
947 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=262, last 2 years)
11%
Sequential Write 256KB
266
445.6
68%
193.5
-27%
510.2
92%
340 ?(120.6 - 519, n=7)
28%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=262, last 2 years)
89%
Random Read 4KB
145.3
161.8
11%
42.5
-71%
120.2
-17%
133.2 ?(88.5 - 173, n=7)
-8%
171.3 ?(13.5 - 345, n=262, last 2 years)
18%
Random Write 4KB
212.5
189.8
-11%
30.3
-86%
195.2
-8%
177.4 ?(95.4 - 213, n=7)
-17%
167.8 ?(30.3 - 475, n=263, last 2 years)
-21%

温度

Max. Load
 38.2 °C33.9 °C32.7 °C 
 37.4 °C34 °C32.8 °C 
 36.5 °C34.5 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 38.2 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
32.5 °C34 °C35.9 °C
32.8 °C34.8 °C38.3 °C
32.5 °C34.6 °C38.4 °C
Maximum: 38.4 °C
Average: 34.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.940.42534.536.43127.728.64028.5295033.2346326.325.78023.422.710022.527.512515.427.916014.631.620012.336.425013.341.731511.645.34007.550.550011.457.863015.262.780014.766.6100011.868.612501266.8160010.36720009.364.2250010.857.8315014.764.7400014.375.7500014.975.163001572.6800015.466.11000016.864.81250016.162.3160001747.2SPL25.981.7N0.746.5median 14.6median 62.7Delta29.936.736.735.738.527.330.233.331.237.432.225.226.718.219.820.520.413.52017.33113.535.413.541.713.14612.950.313.358.815.462.514.165.612.969.19.669.910.668.510.368.21167.812.666.415.264.416.865.316.461.916.565.616.671.815.972.316.654.726.379.30.743median 13.5median 64.41.911.8hearing rangehide median Pink Noiserealme Narzo 50A PrimeXiaomi Redmi 10C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
realme Narzo 50A Prime audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 73% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
realme Narzo 50i Prime
5000 mAh
921 min ∼35% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
5000 mAh
908 min ∼34% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=270, last 2 years)
906 min ∼34% +4%
Samsung Galaxy M13
5000 mAh
895 min ∼34% +2%
realme Narzo 50A Prime
5000 mAh
874 min ∼33%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 34min

Pros

+ 快速记忆
+ 在这个价格范围内的快速充电技术
+ 明亮的全高清屏幕
+ 最新的软件
+ 快速的WLAN

Cons

- 没有NFC
- 不太符合人体工程学(有角度的设计)。
- 旧的Android 11
- 不含充电器
- 平庸的扬声器

评语 - 初学者的良好选择

评测中:realme Narzo 50A Prime。测试设备由:
评测中:realme Narzo 50A Prime。测试设备由:
笔记本billiger.com

如果你不能或不想在智能手机上花很多钱,你将通过realme Narzo 50A Prime获得一个体面的整体包装:一个明亮的全高清显示屏,足够的系统功率用于日常使用,快速存储,用户友好的运行时间,以及相当频繁的软件更新,至少在目前。

平庸的扬声器和屏幕上轻微的蓝色偏光,在其他廉价手机中也可以找到。没有附带充电器,智能手机没有NFC,操作系统仍然基于Android 11,这些都是购买决定中应该考虑的要点。

realme Narzo 50A Prime以非常低的价格提供了一个良好的设备包。

由于50A Prime的价格已经大幅下降,几乎没有任何理由还去购买 Narzo 50i Prime装备差得多。的 Galaxy M13配备了Android 12和NFC,但在性能方面却落后了。

价格和可用性

realme Narzo 50A Prime可直接从制造商处购买,价格为170欧元。在测试的时候,网站上有一个促销活动,有20欧元的折扣。

你可以在一些互联网零售商那里节省更多的钱,例如在我们的贷款网站notebooksbilliger.de上。那里的手机在测试时已经有136欧元的价格。此外,Cyberportamazon.de也有智能手机出售。

realme Narzo 50A Prime - 08/02/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 62%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
86%
Games Performance
12 / 64 → 19%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
52 / 90 → 58%
Camera
49%
Average
70%
76%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme Narzo 50A Prime智能手机评测--全高清和快速内存,价格低廉
Florian Schmitt, 2022-08- 5 (Update: 2022-08- 5)