Notebookcheck

Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen), 06/05/2019
Android Touchscreen Smartphone

前置摄像头已经成为过去了吗? Vivo NEX Dual的亮点是它的两块屏幕。 除了正面的传统屏幕外,NEX Dual背面还有另一个AMOLED面板。 后者意味着您可以使用后置摄像头来自拍,而无需专用的前置摄像头。 请继续阅读,了解这个概念的实际表现以及NEX Dual与其他旗舰智能手机的对比

Vivo Nex Dual Display (Nex Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
10240 MB 
Display
6.39 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, Capacitive multitouch, Super AMOLED, 5.49英寸-1920×1080 OLED屏幕, glossy: yes
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米插孔, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,接近传感器,电子罗盘,陀螺仪, USB Type-C,Miracast,通知LED
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. 3G CDMA: BC0, BC1, BC10. 3G TD-SCDMA: B34, B39. 3G WCDMA: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B19. 4G FDD-LTE: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B17, B19, B20, B25, B26. 4G TDD-LTE: B34, B38, B39, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 157.2 x 75.3
Battery
3500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 9.0 Pie
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix , f / 1.8,1 / 2.55“,1.4μm.2MP辅助传感器,f / 1.8;ToF传感器,f / 1.3;摄像头2 API级别:完整
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB线,模块化电源,保护盖,屏幕保护膜, Funtouch OS 4.5, 12 Months Warranty, LTE Cat 16, DRM Widevine: L3, fanless
Weight
199 g, Power Supply: 79 g
Price
630 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Vivo NEX Dual
Vivo NEX Dual
Vivo NEX Dual

Size Comparison

157.8 mm 74.6 mm 8.8 mm 218 g158.7 mm 75.8 mm 7.7 mm 169 g157.2 mm 75.3 mm 8.1 mm 199 g156.9 mm 75.4 mm 8.1 mm 180 g156.5 mm 74.5 mm 7.9 mm 179 g149.9 mm 70.4 mm 7.8 mm 157 g
Default home screen
Default home screen
A look at the default keyboard and mostly Chinese UI
A look at the default keyboard and mostly Chinese UI
The Quick Settings menu in Funtouch 4.5
The Quick Settings menu in Funtouch 4.5
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
685 (min: 657, max: 705) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
677 (min: 655, max: 698) MBit/s ∼99% +16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
674 (min: 646, max: 691) MBit/s ∼98% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 612, max: 683) MBit/s ∼93% +10%
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Adreno 630, 845
582 (min: 430, max: 702) MBit/s ∼85%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
339 (min: 325, max: 351) MBit/s ∼49% -42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=417)
223 MBit/s ∼33% -62%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
663 (min: 507, max: 704) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
661 (min: 613, max: 699) MBit/s ∼100% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
579 (min: 558, max: 592) MBit/s ∼87% +2%
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Adreno 630, 845
570 (min: 557, max: 582) MBit/s ∼86%
LG V40 ThinQ
Adreno 630, 845, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
554 (min: 492, max: 579) MBit/s ∼84% -3%
Honor View 20
Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
298 (min: 278, max: 319) MBit/s ∼45% -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=417)
213 MBit/s ∼32% -63%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø577 (430-702)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø570 (557-582)
GPS test: Vivo NEX Dual - Overview
GPS test: Vivo NEX Dual - Overview
GPS test: Vivo NEX Dual - Corners
GPS test: Vivo NEX Dual - Corners
GPS test: Vivo NEX Dual - Roundabout
GPS test: Vivo NEX Dual - Roundabout
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Corners
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Corners
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Roundabout
GPS test: Xiaomi Mi 9 - Roundabout
Regular photo
Regular photo
Photo shot in portrait mode
Photo shot in portrait mode
Regular photo
Regular photo
Photo shot in portrait mode
Photo shot in portrait mode
Regular photo
Regular photo
Photo shot with HDR activated
Photo shot with HDR activated
Regular photo
Regular photo
Photo shot with HDR activated
Photo shot with HDR activated
Default camera app UI
Default camera app UI
Default camera app UI
Default camera app UI

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
1) Hauptdisplay (X-Rite i1Pro 2) 2) 2. Display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
585
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
618
cd/m²
591
cd/m²
586
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
636
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Hauptdisplay (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
Maximum: 636 cd/m² Average: 604.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 586 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.1
394
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
397
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
398
cd/m²
405
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
2. Display (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
Maximum: 414 cd/m² Average: 403.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 399 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
Gamma: 2.19
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
LG V40 ThinQ
OLED, 3120x1440, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy S10
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1
Honor View 20
LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
AMOLED, 2248x1080, 6.21
Screen
51%
37%
41%
31%
33%
Brightness middle
399
599
50%
567
42%
701
76%
492
23%
521
31%
Brightness
404
593
47%
559
38%
705
75%
475
18%
517
28%
Brightness Distribution
95
96
1%
89
-6%
98
3%
94
-1%
96
1%
Black Level *
0.4
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.5
1.4
69%
3.3
27%
3.7
18%
2.4
47%
2.9
36%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.6
3.2
67%
6.1
36%
10.3
-7%
5.2
46%
5.5
43%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
2
69%
1.1
83%
1.4
78%
3.2
51%
2.7
58%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.25 98%
2.46 89%
2.1 105%
2.06 107%
2.01 109%
CCT
7405 88%
6496 100%
6495 100%
6553 99%
7125 91%
6288 103%
Contrast
1230

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9448 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9448 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.8 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
13467 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
13374 Points ∼98% -1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13519 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10128 Points ∼75% -25%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9028 Points ∼66% -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13505 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (10876 - 14489, n=25)
13578 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=316)
4562 Points ∼34% -66%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8879 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8634 Points ∼85% -3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8687 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
10162 Points ∼100% +14%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9868 Points ∼97% +11%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8988 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7754 - 9231, n=27)
8705 Points ∼86% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=374)
4587 Points ∼45% -48%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
2407 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2333 Points ∼52% -3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2397 Points ∼53% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4499 Points ∼100% +87%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3314 Points ∼74% +38%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2418 Points ∼54% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2272 - 2500, n=27)
2416 Points ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (691 - 4824, n=376)
1369 Points ∼30% -43%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8211 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8326 Points ∼90% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8141 Points ∼88% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7595 Points ∼82% -8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
9243 Points ∼100% +13%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8099 Points ∼88% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7983 - 9868, n=28)
8069 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 11440, n=370)
5030 Points ∼54% -39%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
9988 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
10052 Points ∼79% +1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
10361 Points ∼81% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9750 Points ∼76% -2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
12778 Points ∼100% +28%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
9795 Points ∼77% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (7998 - 13211, n=26)
10123 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4096 - 14439, n=538)
5516 Points ∼43% -45%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
2185 Points ∼50%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2802 Points ∼64% +28%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2809 Points ∼64% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2981 Points ∼68% +36%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4381 Points ∼100% +101%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3639 Points ∼83% +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2185 - 3764, n=28)
3088 Points ∼70% +41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4535, n=384)
1832 Points ∼42% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5387 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4480 Points ∼78% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4133 Points ∼72% -23%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5358 Points ∼93% -1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3718 Points ∼65% -31%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5741 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4133 - 8206, n=28)
5439 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (76 - 8206, n=384)
1603 Points ∼28% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4063 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3846 Points ∼76% -5%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3741 Points ∼74% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4551 Points ∼89% +12%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
3847 Points ∼76% -5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5088 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3512 - 5200, n=28)
4607 Points ∼91% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (94 - 6312, n=387)
1489 Points ∼29% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3332 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3060 Points ∼70% -8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2871 Points ∼65% -14%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4393 Points ∼100% +32%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3649 Points ∼83% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2110 - 3763, n=27)
3094 Points ∼70% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=399)
1809 Points ∼41% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8445 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8245 Points ∼98% -2%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6024 Points ∼71% -29%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5327 Points ∼63% -37%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8341 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5228 - 8451, n=27)
7671 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (131 - 14951, n=399)
2187 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
6308 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6054 Points ∼93% -4%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4842 Points ∼75% -23%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5087 Points ∼78% -19%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6487 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4034 - 6568, n=27)
5761 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (159 - 8141, n=400)
1860 Points ∼29% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
2808 Points ∼67%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
2653 Points ∼64% -6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2740 Points ∼66% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2854 Points ∼68% +2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4175 Points ∼100% +49%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3623 Points ∼87% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2118 - 3703, n=27)
3217 Points ∼77% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4320, n=460)
1768 Points ∼42% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
5160 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4223 Points ∼82% -18%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4275 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5176 Points ∼100% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4256 Points ∼82% -18%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
5181 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3488 - 5246, n=27)
4919 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (65 - 6362, n=462)
1331 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4349 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3677 Points ∼78% -15%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3802 Points ∼80% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4383 Points ∼93% +1%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4238 Points ∼90% -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4729 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3197 - 4734, n=27)
4388 Points ∼93% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (80 - 5734, n=470)
1269 Points ∼27% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
3276 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3221 Points ∼76% -2%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2731 Points ∼65% -17%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4214 Points ∼100% +29%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3543 Points ∼84% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2124 - 3668, n=27)
3115 Points ∼74% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 4454, n=493)
1677 Points ∼40% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
8225 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8236 Points ∼100% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6439 Points ∼78% -22%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5252 Points ∼64% -36%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8219 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5637 - 8312, n=27)
7763 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 10008, n=493)
1804 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
6156 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
6118 Points ∼96% -1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4947 Points ∼78% -20%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4979 Points ∼78% -19%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6355 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4363 - 6454, n=27)
5811 Points ∼91% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 7820, n=501)
1548 Points ∼24% -75%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
33309 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35987 Points ∼97% +8%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30418 Points ∼82% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
31297 Points ∼84% -6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
37164 Points ∼100% +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35430 Points ∼95% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (15614 - 37475, n=27)
33322 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 45072, n=652)
13700 Points ∼37% -59%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
85487 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
83976 Points ∼98% -2%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
79818 Points ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
71292 Points ∼83% -17%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67388 Points ∼79% -21%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
81640 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (53794 - 85487, n=27)
80548 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7573 - 162695, n=652)
20162 Points ∼24% -76%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
63403 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
64627 Points ∼100% +2%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
58651 Points ∼91% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55524 Points ∼86% -12%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
57073 Points ∼88% -10%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
63295 Points ∼98% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (34855 - 65330, n=27)
61139 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8513 - 83518, n=653)
16700 Points ∼26% -74%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
146 fps ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
152 fps ∼100% +4%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
105 fps ∼69% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
143 fps ∼94% -2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
118 fps ∼78% -19%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
150 fps ∼99% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (98 - 152, n=28)
142 fps ∼93% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=681)
35.2 fps ∼23% -76%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
60 fps ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
60 fps ∼97% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
60 fps ∼97% 0%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼97% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (58 - 89, n=27)
62.1 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=684)
27.1 fps ∼44% -55%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
69 fps ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
81 fps ∼95% +17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼69% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
85 fps ∼100% +23%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
67 fps ∼79% -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
82 fps ∼96% +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (54 - 83, n=27)
73.1 fps ∼86% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=600)
19.4 fps ∼23% -72%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
56 fps ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
56 fps ∼95% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼56% -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼90% -5%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
59 fps ∼100% +5%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (33 - 75, n=27)
54.4 fps ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=605)
17.9 fps ∼30% -68%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
49 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +20%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
41 fps ∼68% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% +8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
50 fps ∼83% +2%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (32 - 61, n=28)
53.9 fps ∼90% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=461)
15.9 fps ∼27% -68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
43 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
50 fps ∼91% +16%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
21 fps ∼38% -51%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
30 fps ∼55% -30%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
48 fps ∼87% +12%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (21 - 59, n=27)
45.3 fps ∼82% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=464)
15.3 fps ∼28% -64%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
14 fps ∼70%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +43%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼60% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼80% +14%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +43%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
14 fps ∼70% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (12 - 25, n=17)
18.6 fps ∼93% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=164)
8.87 fps ∼44% -37%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
21 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
31 fps ∼100% +48%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
12 fps ∼39% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼55% -19%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
14 fps ∼45% -33%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
22 fps ∼71% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (11 - 31, n=17)
15.6 fps ∼50% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=164)
6.16 fps ∼20% -71%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
32 fps ∼91%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
20 fps ∼57% -37%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
16 fps ∼46% -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
25 fps ∼71% -22%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
31 fps ∼89% -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (16 - 40, n=17)
29.1 fps ∼83% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=165)
13.4 fps ∼38% -58%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
36 fps ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼68% -17%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
30 fps ∼68% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
44 fps ∼100% +22%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
34 fps ∼77% -6%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
37 fps ∼84% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (29 - 38, n=16)
35.2 fps ∼80% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=165)
14.7 fps ∼33% -59%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
33 fps ∼94%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
35 fps ∼100% +6%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
26 fps ∼74% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
35 fps ∼100% +6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
32 fps ∼91% -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
35 fps ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (25 - 35, n=27)
33.4 fps ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=390)
10.7 fps ∼31% -68%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
29 fps ∼88%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
30 fps ∼91% +3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
13 fps ∼39% -55%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼70% -21%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
28 fps ∼85% -3%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (13 - 37, n=27)
27.7 fps ∼84% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=394)
9.7 fps ∼29% -67%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
280812 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
292798 Points ∼89% +4%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
270884 Points ∼83% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
328111 Points ∼100% +17%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
306296 Points ∼93% +9%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
287049 Points ∼87% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (246366 - 299878, n=27)
277434 Points ∼85% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52607 - 398720, n=282)
131480 Points ∼40% -53%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
233369 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
228173 Points ∼85% -2%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
229374 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
269219 Points ∼100% +15%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
252800 Points ∼94% +8%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
231092 Points ∼86% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (162183 - 242953, n=23)
225534 Points ∼84% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 283270, n=484)
86445 Points ∼32% -63%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
1387 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
1386 Points ∼99% 0%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1228 Points ∼87% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1385 Points ∼99% 0%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
1404 Points ∼100% +1%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
1345 Points ∼96% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (1009 - 1613, n=26)
1344 Points ∼96% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1731, n=613)
744 Points ∼53% -46%
Graphics (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
7996 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
7891 Points ∼99% -1%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6726 Points ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7361 Points ∼92% -8%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
7484 Points ∼94% -6%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
7930 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (5846 - 8001, n=26)
7797 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 15969, n=613)
1960 Points ∼25% -75%
Memory (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4356 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
3791 Points ∼68% -13%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
2910 Points ∼52% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4570 Points ∼81% +5%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
5616 Points ∼100% +29%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4492 Points ∼80% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (2193 - 5296, n=26)
3649 Points ∼65% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=613)
1465 Points ∼26% -66%
System (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
7977 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
8146 Points ∼95% +2%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
6717 Points ∼78% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7476 Points ∼87% -6%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
8594 Points ∼100% +8%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
8212 Points ∼96% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (4417 - 8613, n=26)
7644 Points ∼89% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 12202, n=613)
2881 Points ∼34% -64%
Overall (sort by value)
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 10240
4421 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 8192
4287 Points ∼90% -3%
LG V40 ThinQ
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
3565 Points ∼75% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4320 Points ∼91% -2%
Honor View 20
HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 8192
4746 Points ∼100% +7%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Adreno 630, 6144
4454 Points ∼94% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
  (3291 - 4693, n=26)
4111 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (150 - 6097, n=617)
1432 Points ∼30% -68%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
108.07 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
85.976 Points ∼80%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
84.005 Points ∼78%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
82.61 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (0 - 90.9, n=27)
74.3 Points ∼69%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
70.062 Points ∼65%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 273, n=514)
39 Points ∼36%
Vivo Nex Dual Display
Points ∼0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
22500 Points ∼100% +388%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20286 Points ∼90% +340%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
16489 Points ∼73% +258%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
15906 Points ∼71% +245%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
15819 Points ∼70% +243%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28)
15153 Points ∼67% +229%
Average of class Smartphone (1994 - 43280, n=674)
6335 Points ∼28% +38%
Vivo Nex Dual Display (Chrome 72)
4606 Points ∼20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=694)
10740 ms * ∼100% -84%
Vivo Nex Dual Display (Chrome 72)
5840.7 ms * ∼54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28)
2905 ms * ∼27% +50%
LG V40 ThinQ (Chrome 71)
2361 ms * ∼22% +60%
ZTE Axon 9 Pro (Chrome 71)
2357.6 ms * ∼22% +60%
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 (Chrome 70)
2299.9 ms * ∼21% +61%
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71)
2048.1 ms * ∼19% +65%
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1924.2 ms * ∼18% +67%

* ... smaller is better

Vivo Nex Dual DisplayXiaomi Mi Mix 3LG V40 ThinQSamsung Galaxy S10Honor View 20ZTE Axon 9 ProGlobal Average -3Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
-21%
-17%
19%
-19%
-71%
-67%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
63.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
61.64 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
48.1 (9.5 - 87.1, n=462)
48.7 (9.5 - 87.1, n=407)
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
84.88 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
77.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
85.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
66.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=462)
66.8 (8.1 - 96.5, n=407)
Random Write 4KB
135.81
19.54
-86%
23.36
-83%
24.44
-82%
138.85
2%
22.52
-83%
17 (0.13 - 250, n=938)
-87%
20.4 (0.14 - 250, n=722)
-85%
Random Read 4KB
126.65
133.24
5%
130.13
3%
137.4
8%
168.91
33%
141.34
12%
39.2 (1.32 - 175, n=938)
-69%
45.3 (1.59 - 175, n=722)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.89
206.76
7%
203.92
5%
193.24
0%
250.06
29%
196.43
1%
80.5 (2.04 - 503, n=938)
-58%
92.9 (2.99 - 503, n=722)
-52%
Sequential Read 256KB
767.76
674.98
-12%
689.59
-10%
831.94
8%
847.48
10%
719.1
-6%
226 (4.36 - 1468, n=938)
-71%
261 (12.1 - 1468, n=722)
-66%
Max. Load
 36.8 °C35.6 °C32.2 °C 
 35.9 °C35.1 °C31.6 °C 
 35.5 °C32.4 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 36.8 °C
Average: 34 °C
34.3 °C33.8 °C31.5 °C
34.1 °C32.4 °C31.2 °C
32.8 °C31.7 °C30.5 °C
Maximum: 34.3 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  31.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.432.72528.324.33118.721.74026.721.75033.229.16322.6218021.822.210024.427.212523.83016018.544.720017.150.725017.85531515.554.640014.160.45001465.863013.865.780014.764.6100015.469.4125015.273.7160014.378.4200014.580.3250013.982.8315014.681.7400014.176.3500014.373.6630014.575.8800014.875.81000014.878.31250014.863.8160001549.3SPL26.889.8N0.874.7median 14.8median 65.8Delta1.511.835.739.626.725.828.722.426.52936.936.426.725.426.921.922.323.820.223.917.741.218.741.919.248.815.85515.660.613.964.314.365.614.866.513.466.914.370.114.571.913.873.613.674.914.174.914.17414.976.71572.915.269.814.973.414.766.114.75326.784.80.859.7median 14.8median 66.51.711.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseVivo Nex Dual DisplayXiaomi Mi Mix 3
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Vivo Nex Dual Display audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.37 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.72 / 1.36 / 1.38 Watt
Load midlight 3.56 / 8.61 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Vivo Nex Dual Display
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
23%
-7%
-9%
-53%
-11%
-28%
-15%
Idle Minimum *
0.72
0.49
32%
0.87
-21%
0.61
15%
0.97
-35%
0.86
-19%
0.862 (0.42 - 1.8, n=26)
-20%
0.879 (0.2 - 3.4, n=750)
-22%
Idle Average *
1.36
0.67
51%
1.39
-2%
1.27
7%
2.58
-90%
1.1
19%
1.728 (0.67 - 2.9, n=26)
-27%
1.733 (0.6 - 6.2, n=749)
-27%
Idle Maximum *
1.38
0.87
37%
1.41
-2%
1.3
6%
2.63
-91%
1.21
12%
2.07 (0.87 - 3.5, n=26)
-50%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=750)
-46%
Load Average *
3.56
3.64
-2%
3.96
-11%
6.17
-73%
5.24
-47%
5.02
-41%
4.87 (3.56 - 7.41, n=26)
-37%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=744)
-14%
Load Maximum *
8.61
9.04
-5%
8.6
-0%
8.55
1%
8.73
-1%
10.82
-26%
9.27 (6.2 - 12.3, n=26)
-8%
5.88 (1.2 - 14.2, n=744)
32%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
12h 56min
Vivo Nex Dual Display
3500 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3
3200 mAh
LG V40 ThinQ
3300 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10
3400 mAh
Honor View 20
4000 mAh
ZTE Axon 9 Pro
4000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
776
719
-7%
510
-34%
427
-45%
969
25%
661
-15%

Pros

+ 几乎无边框的屏幕
+ 出色的自拍效果
+ 10GB RAM
+ 高速UFS存储
+ 强大的SoC
+ 不错的续航
+ OLED面板亮度高

Cons

- 颜色显示不准确
- 相机不是旗舰级别
- Funtouch OS限制
- 一般般的单声道扬声器
- 没有VoLTE
Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.
Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen.

Vivo NEX Dual是一个有趣的替代方案,它为了几乎100%的屏占比放弃了前置摄像头。Vivo决定采用耳机插孔和近乎无边框的坚固设计给我们留下了深刻的印象。同样,它具有非常明亮的显示屏和不错的电池续航时间,应该可以让您至少一天一充。

Vivo NEX Dual是一款令人兴奋的智能手机,可以突破界限,提供全面的体验,不过也有一些其他主流设计智能手机不会受到的限制。

但是,该设备有其缺点。首先,我们不是特别喜欢Funtouch OS,特别是其不完整的翻译和第三方应用扩展错误。此外,虽然相机在前置标准方面表现出色,但它们无法在低光下与其他旗舰智能手机中的光学镜头竞争。其他一些小批评包括我们的评测单位的摇摆按键,3级DRM Widevine认证和IP 67认证;考虑到它的价格,我们原本认为该设备至少具有IP68认证。总体而言,NEX Dual是双显示智能手机概念的成功实现,除了一些小问题问题外几乎没有真正的缺点。

Vivo Nex Dual Display - 03/26/2019 v6
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
43 / 60 → 72%
Weight
88%
Battery
96%
Display
81%
Games Performance
68 / 63 → 100%
Application Performance
77 / 70 → 100%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
61 / 91 → 67%
Camera
76%
Average
79%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Vivo NEX双屏版智能手机评测
Marcus Herbrich, 2019-06- 5 (Update: 2019-06- 5)