Notebookcheck

小米红米K30 5G智能手机评测:拥有120hz屏幕和5G的廉价手机

畅享丝滑。 Redmi K30靠着5G功能,120 Hz屏幕和最新Sony IMX686图像传感器等高端功能。它的起价约为250欧元(约合270美元),甚至比大多数当前中档智能手机价格还低。 不过它也有缺陷,我们的评测将对此进行讨论。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Zewei Shen),
Android Touchscreen Smartphone Phablet
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Redmi K Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, LCD IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计,陀螺仪,接近传感器,指南针, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G: N41/N78; 4G: FDD-LTE: B1/B3/B5/B8; TDD-LTE: B34/B38/B39/B40/B41; 3G: WCDMA 850/1900/2100 MHz; 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.79 x 165.3 x 76.6
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix Sony IMX686、120°超广角和f / 2.2孔径(8 MP),带f / 2.4孔径的微距摄像机(5 MP),带f / 2.4光圈的2 MP摄像机。Camera2 API:3级
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix 20 + 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 快速充电器,USB电缆,SIM工具,硅胶保护壳, MIUI 11, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
208 g, Power Supply: 89 g
Price
260 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
04/2020
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79 %
realme XT
SD 712, Adreno 616
183 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.4"2340x1080
81 %
09/2019
Xiaomi Mi 9T
SD 730, Adreno 618
191 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.39"2340x1080
79 %
10/2019
Nokia 7.2
SD 660, Adreno 512
180 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
80 %
01/2020
Samsung Galaxy A51
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
172 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.5"2400x1080
79 %
02/2020
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4
159 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.15"2312x1080
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (345min - 697max) MBit/s ∼100%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
344 (336min - 352max) MBit/s ∼50% -50%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
333 (297min - 343max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
realme XT
Adreno 616, SD 712, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
322 (162min - 367max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
298 (185min - 350max) MBit/s ∼43% -57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=584)
274 MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
189 (80min - 224max) MBit/s ∼28% -72%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (280min - 399max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
297 (189min - 335max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Nokia 7.2
Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
296 (223min - 308max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Adreno 618, SD 730, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
293 (161min - 346max) MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=584)
261 MBit/s ∼77% -23%
realme XT
Adreno 616, SD 712, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
248 (105min - 306max) MBit/s ∼73% -27%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
224 (197min - 260max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø674 (345-697)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (280-399)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Curves
GPS test: Garmin Edge 500 - Curves
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Overview
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Loop
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Curves
GPS test: Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - Curves

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
28 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
93 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: 46.91 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 92.95 ∆E
ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G: 5.36 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 14.19 ∆E
A cropped photo of our test chart
A cropped photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart at 1 lux
640
cd/m²
664
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
615
cd/m²
658
cd/m²
661
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
639
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 664 cd/m² Average: 643 cd/m² Minimum: 2.25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 658 cd/m²
Contrast: 1343:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.64-98 Ø6
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
realme XT
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Mi 9T
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Nokia 7.2
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Samsung Galaxy A51
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
IPS, 2312x1080, 6.15
Screen
-64%
-1%
-47%
-16%
-40%
Brightness middle
658
414
-37%
589
-10%
604
-8%
589
-10%
507
-23%
Brightness
643
414
-36%
589
-8%
593
-8%
589
-8%
481
-25%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
96
3%
92
-1%
94
1%
88
-5%
Black Level *
0.49
0.4
18%
0.38
22%
Contrast
1343
1510
12%
1334
-1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.8
4.4
-144%
2.5
-39%
5.1
-183%
2.22
-23%
4.72
-162%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.4
11.2
-155%
4.9
-11%
10.3
-134%
8.24
-87%
7.84
-78%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.8
4.3
-13%
1.6
58%
6.4
-68%
2.6
32%
5.5
-45%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.31 95%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.111 104%
2.158 102%
CCT
6255 104%
6532 100%
6544 99%
8149 80%
6508 100%
7596 86%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2358 Hz ≤ 43 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 43 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.2 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
49.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise
↘ 25.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼66% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼100% +58%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼70% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼100% +45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=8)
1792 Points ∼92% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=108)
1955 Points ∼100% +29%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼95%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=8)
600 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=108)
555 Points ∼93% -2%
Geekbench 4.0
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7997 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7755 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
7997 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (600 - 12668, n=85)
3997 Points ∼50% -50%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7661 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6900 Points ∼90% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
7661 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (918 - 12199, n=131)
4224 Points ∼55% -45%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3072 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2547 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3072 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (391 - 5109, n=131)
1455 Points ∼47% -53%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
8276 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7533 Points ∼75% -25%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
5917 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5649 Points ∼57% -43%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6042 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7754 - 9989, n=8)
8461 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=511)
5919 Points ∼59% -41%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼96%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
11143 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9049 Points ∼81% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
6416 Points ∼58% -40%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7593 Points ∼68% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=8)
9783 Points ∼88% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=669)
6487 Points ∼58% -39%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼93%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2069 Points ∼74% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2786 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2207 Points ∼79% -15%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2161 Points ∼78% -16%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2196 Points ∼79% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2893, n=8)
2682 Points ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=165)
2653 Points ∼95% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1885 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1917 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1141 Points ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1438 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
796 Points ∼25% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3059 - 3198, n=8)
3158 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=165)
2966 Points ∼94% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼98%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1923 Points ∼63% -35%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2060 Points ∼68% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1278 Points ∼42% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1554 Points ∼51% -48%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
927 Points ∼31% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2877 - 3130, n=8)
3030 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6754, n=165)
2665 Points ∼88% -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼91%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1982 Points ∼61% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3241 Points ∼100% +9%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2693 Points ∼83% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2311 Points ∼71% -22%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2092 Points ∼65% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3544, n=8)
3152 Points ∼97% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=514)
2203 Points ∼68% -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2147 Points ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2176 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1256 Points ∼35% -65%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1530 Points ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
838 Points ∼24% -76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3448 - 3589, n=8)
3545 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=514)
2112 Points ∼59% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼99%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2108 Points ∼61% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2347 Points ∼68% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1425 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1654 Points ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
967 Points ∼28% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=8)
3430 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8269, n=515)
1973 Points ∼58% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼97%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1946 Points ∼59% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3296 Points ∼100% +3%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2640 Points ∼80% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2336 Points ∼71% -27%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2084 Points ∼63% -35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3555, n=8)
3128 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=545)
2114 Points ∼64% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3248 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3316 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2007 Points ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1993 Points ∼37% -63%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1261 Points ∼23% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5070 - 5437, n=8)
5313 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=545)
2830 Points ∼53% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2828 Points ∼61% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3312 Points ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2120 Points ∼46% -54%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2060 Points ∼44% -56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1382 Points ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=8)
4568 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=545)
2377 Points ∼51% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼98%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2617 Points ∼78% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3227 Points ∼97% -1%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2649 Points ∼79% -19%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2217 Points ∼66% -32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2207 Points ∼66% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3233 - 3503, n=8)
3338 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=595)
2086 Points ∼62% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1928 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2008 Points ∼61% -39%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1181 Points ∼36% -64%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1473 Points ∼45% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
730 Points ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3174 - 3321, n=8)
3271 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=595)
1780 Points ∼54% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2048 Points ∼62% -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2192 Points ∼67% -33%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1347 Points ∼41% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1592 Points ∼49% -51%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
858 Points ∼26% -74%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3187 - 3346, n=8)
3280 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7400, n=596)
1697 Points ∼52% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2619 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3239 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2632 Points ∼77% -23%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2225 Points ∼65% -35%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2179 Points ∼63% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3476, n=8)
3120 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=637)
1951 Points ∼57% -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼99%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3100 Points ∼60% -39%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3184 Points ∼62% -38%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
1913 Points ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2027 Points ∼39% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
870 Points ∼17% -83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4834 - 5832, n=8)
5152 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12611, n=636)
2342 Points ∼45% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2978 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3196 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
2037 Points ∼44% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2068 Points ∼44% -56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1004 Points ∼22% -78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3576 - 4693, n=8)
4434 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=639)
2014 Points ∼43% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13698 Points ∼59% -41%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
19433 Points ∼84% -16%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
18094 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20393 Points ∼88% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18769 - 23203, n=8)
20317 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=783)
15426 Points ∼66% -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
37657 Points ∼55% -45%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
46605 Points ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
28898 Points ∼42% -58%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
25086 Points ∼37% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (66415 - 69645, n=8)
68420 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=781)
26562 Points ∼39% -61%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
27117 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
35557 Points ∼74% -26%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
25513 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23866 Points ∼50% -50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43325 - 47824, n=8)
44809 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=781)
20767 Points ∼43% -57%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
74 fps ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
77 fps ∼81% -19%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
50 fps ∼52% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
46 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
33 fps ∼35% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (94 - 97, n=6)
95.3 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=786)
44.9 fps ∼47% -53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
58 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
58 fps ∼67% -33%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
46 fps ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼47% -53%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
31 fps ∼36% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (60 - 86, n=6)
64.5 fps ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=795)
31 fps ∼36% -64%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
36 fps ∼66% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
38 fps ∼70% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
23 fps ∼42% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
24 fps ∼44% -56%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
18 fps ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (49 - 56, n=6)
54.2 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=691)
26.5 fps ∼49% -51%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼96%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
33 fps ∼66% -31%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼68% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
21 fps ∼42% -56%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼46% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
16 fps ∼32% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (47 - 55, n=6)
50 fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=699)
22.3 fps ∼45% -54%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼98%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
26 fps ∼69% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
27 fps ∼72% -27%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
15 fps ∼40% -59%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
15 fps ∼40% -59%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
12 fps ∼32% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (37 - 38, n=6)
37.7 fps ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=554)
21.3 fps ∼56% -42%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼99%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
23 fps ∼69% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼72% -27%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
13 fps ∼39% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼42% -58%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
11 fps ∼33% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (32 - 34, n=6)
33.3 fps ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=556)
19.4 fps ∼58% -41%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼72%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
9 fps ∼73% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9.3 fps ∼75% +4%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
4.9 fps ∼40% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.5 fps ∼44% -38%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4.2 fps ∼34% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.9 - 13, n=8)
12.4 fps ∼100% +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=307)
11.3 fps ∼91% +27%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5.9 fps ∼45% -55%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6.1 fps ∼47% -53%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
3.2 fps ∼25% -75%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼27% -73%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2.6 fps ∼20% -80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.3 - 13, n=8)
9.06 fps ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=305)
8.07 fps ∼62% -38%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
14 fps ∼67% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼71% -29%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
7.7 fps ∼37% -63%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.1 fps ∼43% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (20 - 21, n=8)
20.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=311)
16.8 fps ∼80% -20%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼97%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
16 fps ∼68% -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼68% -30%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.7 fps ∼37% -62%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼42% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.9 fps ∼29% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (23 - 24, n=8)
23.6 fps ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=310)
19.4 fps ∼82% -16%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
15 fps ∼71% -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16 fps ∼76% -24%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
9 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼48% -52%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
6.4 fps ∼30% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 21, n=6)
21 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=479)
14.3 fps ∼68% -32%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
13 fps ∼68% -32%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼68% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
8.2 fps ∼43% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
8.6 fps ∼45% -55%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
7.3 fps ∼38% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18 - 19, n=6)
18.5 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=483)
12.7 fps ∼67% -33%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23.1 (11.15min - 38.98max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
16.91 fps ∼73% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
23.1 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼83% -17%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
fps ∼0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13.56 fps ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21.97 (12.98min - 44.43max) fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15.51 fps ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
22 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼90% -9%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3258 Score ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2000 Score ∼61% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
3258 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=87)
2558 Score ∼79% -21%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
1004 Points ∼73% -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1099 Points ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 Points ∼1% -99%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
998 Points ∼72% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=6)
1353 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=725)
818 Points ∼59% -41%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼98%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3031 Points ∼59% -40%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3559 Points ∼69% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2168 Points ∼42% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
1466 Points ∼28% -71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5087 - 5216, n=6)
5172 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=725)
2491 Points ∼48% -51%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
3026 Points ∼57% -43%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4646 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1605 Points ∼30% -70%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2993 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=6)
5147 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=725)
1850 Points ∼35% -65%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
5198 Points ∼76% -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6760 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4738 Points ∼69% -31%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
4909 Points ∼71% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6069 - 6870, n=6)
6619 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=725)
3444 Points ∼50% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
2630 Points ∼66% -34%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3329 Points ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
634 Points ∼16% -84%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
2153 Points ∼54% -46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3674 - 4094, n=6)
3933 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=725)
1754 Points ∼44% -56%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
56728 Points ∼87%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
38440 Points ∼59% -32%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
26647 Points ∼41% -53%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
38475 Points ∼59% -32%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
60649 Points ∼93% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56728 - 71215, n=6)
65494 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6969 - 110361, n=109)
54914 Points ∼84% -3%
MEM (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60481 Points ∼100%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
41759 Points ∼69% -31%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
32883 Points ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
43405 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
35479 Points ∼59% -41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56273 - 64466, n=6)
59132 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9394 - 122714, n=108)
55910 Points ∼92% -8%
GPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
93039 Points ∼92%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
61715 Points ∼61% -34%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
35936 Points ∼35% -61%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
36821 Points ∼36% -60%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
28697 Points ∼28% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (92335 - 94657, n=6)
93497 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4095 - 224320, n=108)
101605 Points ∼100% +9%
CPU (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86677 Points ∼83%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
76522 Points ∼73% -12%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
62411 Points ∼59% -28%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
62594 Points ∼60% -28%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
60900 Points ∼58% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (86677 - 105735, n=6)
99756 Points ∼95% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23816 - 185108, n=108)
104948 Points ∼100% +21%
Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼94%
realme XT
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712, Adreno 616, 6144
218436 Points ∼69% -27%
Nokia 7.2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096
157877 Points ∼50% -47%
Samsung Galaxy A51
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
181295 Points ∼57% -39%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 6144
185725 Points ∼58% -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (298925 - 332074, n=6)
318214 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=108)
317934 Points ∼100% +6%
Geekbench 4.4
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8591 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7795 Points ∼89% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8591 - 8968, n=2)
8780 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=354)
4882 Points ∼56% -43%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6213 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6871 Points ∼98% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6213 - 7765, n=2)
6989 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (883 - 13589, n=417)
4999 Points ∼72% -20%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2689 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Mi 9T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2527 Points ∼91% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2689 - 2863, n=2)
2776 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (390 - 4965, n=417)
1528 Points ∼55% -43%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (39.3 - 58.7, n=6)
48.6 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
47.131 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=185)
40.6 Points ∼76% -24%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.333 Points ∼59% -41%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
27.681 Points ∼52% -48%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
94.778 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (93.6 - 94.8, n=3)
94.3 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
87.488 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
51.257 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
50.919 Points ∼54% -46%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
50.163 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=616)
47.1 Points ∼50% -50%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
54.9 runs/min ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (49.8 - 54.9, n=4)
52.3 runs/min ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
46.46 runs/min ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=168)
42.9 runs/min ∼78% -22%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
31.4 runs/min ∼57% -43%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
29.1 runs/min ∼53% -47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
86 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (72 - 101, n=6)
79.8 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=252)
69.8 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
57 Points ∼66% -29%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
52 Points ∼60% -35%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
47 Points ∼55% -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (16523 - 19143, n=6)
18245 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
17501 Points ∼93% -7%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
10328 Points ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
10194 Points ∼54% -46%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
9549 Points ∼51% -49%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=783)
7840 Points ∼42% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=809)
9777 ms * ∼100% -251%
realme XT (Chrome 79)
4382.8 ms * ∼45% -57%
Samsung Galaxy A51 (Chrome 79)
4375.1 ms * ∼45% -57%
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79)
4317.8 ms * ∼44% -55%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2602 - 2835, n=6)
2726 ms * ∼28% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T (Chrome 75.0.3770.101)
2563.9 ms * ∼26% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5Grealme XTXiaomi Mi 9TNokia 7.2Samsung Galaxy A51Huawei P30 Lite New EditionAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-37%
-12%
-55%
-17%
48%
5%
-56%
Random Write 4KB
100.99
25
-75%
107.82
7%
13.38
-87%
104.4
3%
171.6
70%
109 (18.2 - 290, n=59)
8%
35.4 (0.14 - 319, n=879)
-65%
Random Read 4KB
96.8
112.46
16%
128.65
33%
79.64
-18%
110.8
14%
198.7
105%
143 (96.8 - 239, n=59)
48%
58.7 (1.59 - 324, n=879)
-39%
Sequential Write 256KB
312.76
173.74
-44%
179.19
-43%
161.4
-48%
184.9
-41%
391.1
25%
238 (182 - 503, n=59)
-24%
127 (2.99 - 911, n=879)
-59%
Sequential Read 256KB
889.67
483.79
-46%
492.74
-45%
290.83
-67%
496.1
-44%
800.3
-10%
764 (427 - 999, n=59)
-14%
339 (12.1 - 1802, n=879)
-62%
PUBG Mobile
01020304050Tooltip
; Balanced: Ø39.9 (35-41)
; HD: Ø29.9 (29-31)
Asphalt 9: Legends
010203040Tooltip
; High Quality: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; Standard / low: Ø29.5 (23-31)
Dead Trigger 2
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
: Ø120 (116-120)
Max. Load
 33.1 °C32.8 °C33.6 °C 
 32.7 °C32.4 °C34 °C 
 31.4 °C30.9 °C32.5 °C 
Maximum: 34 °C
Average: 32.6 °C
30.2 °C31.8 °C33.2 °C
29.2 °C31.2 °C32.5 °C
28.9 °C30.6 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 33.2 °C
Average: 31 °C
Power Supply (max.)  26.2 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260 / Fluke t3000 FC
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.2292524.428.93127.324.84022.723.2503333.56326.7268023.426.41002125.512517.62816018.245.520014.744.52501549.83151653.740015.756.350014.461.663014.362.580014.269100014.272.5125013.874.2160014.974.8200014.574.9250014.675.2315014.374.8400014.476500014.976.4630014.473.8800014.673100001573.81250015.167.51600015.557SPL26.785.9N0.863.8median 14.7median 69Delta0.611.229.829.125.229.521.629.424.724.129.627.122.524.325.121.120.125.819.938.520.849.417.651.717.655.317.458.516.159.913.963.814.566.216.167.214.572.414.473.513.675.313.976.214.578.114.47814.876.114.779.114.878.314.977.215.176.11566.215.155.126.9880.972median 14.9median 67.21.511.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi K30 5Grealme XT
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

realme XT audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.66 / 2.37 / 2.42 Watt
Load midlight 6.8 / 7.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
realme XT
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
38%
44%
1%
11%
1%
4%
13%
Idle Minimum *
0.66
0.55
17%
0.54
18%
0.77
-17%
0.9
-36%
0.95
-44%
1.016 (0.66 - 1.8, n=8)
-54%
0.89 (0.2 - 3.4, n=883)
-35%
Idle Average *
2.37
1.39
41%
0.95
60%
2.32
2%
1.7
28%
2.1
11%
2.11 (1.43 - 2.55, n=8)
11%
1.755 (0.6 - 6.2, n=882)
26%
Idle Maximum *
2.42
1.44
40%
1.08
55%
2.41
-0%
1.8
26%
2.4
1%
2.26 (1.54 - 2.9, n=8)
7%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=883)
16%
Load Average *
6.8
2.97
56%
2.7
60%
4.44
35%
5.2
24%
4.2
38%
4.11 (3.14 - 6.8, n=8)
40%
4.1 (0.8 - 10.8, n=877)
40%
Load Maximum *
7.5
4.92
34%
5.4
28%
8.79
-17%
6.6
12%
7.7
-3%
6.12 (5.2 - 7.5, n=8)
18%
6.07 (1.2 - 14.2, n=877)
19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 43min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 03min
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
realme XT
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T
4000 mAh
Nokia 7.2
3500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A51
4000 mAh
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition
3340 mAh
Battery Runtime
-10%
25%
-29%
1%
-11%
Reader / Idle
2083
2138
3%
1689
-19%
1359
-35%
H.264
734
1208
65%
846
15%
802
9%
WiFi v1.3
802
718
-10%
991
24%
570
-29%
698
-13%
719
-10%
Load
243
258
6%
289
19%
223
-8%

Pros

+ 高亮度IPS面板
+ 120 Hz刷新率
+ 精确的GPS
+ 高速的UFS存储
+ 低表面温度
+ 5G连接
+ 高性能SoC
+ 包装盒中包含30 W充电器
+ 优秀的主摄

Cons

- 相机在弱光条件下表现不佳
- 照片放大有问题
- PWM调光
- LCD面板(光晕现象,低对比度)
- 单声道扬声器
- 进口版本限制(软件,质保,LTE Band 20)
- 没有无线充电

Verdict - Xiaomi redefines the mid-range smartphone market once again

The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.
The Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G smartphone review. Test device courtesy of Trading Shenzhen.

Redmi K30不仅看起来很棒,而且做工优良,价格约为300欧元(约324美元)。配备了以前仅为旗舰智能手机保留的5G功能和120 Hz屏幕。新款Sony IMX686相机传感器在日光下也表现出色,并在中档智能手机相机领域树立了标准。新的高通SoC也为当前游戏提供了足够的性能。

如果小米开始在欧洲销售与Redmi K30 5G相当的产品,那么目前约300欧元(约324美元)的价格会比小米的最新中档手机更好。

尽管Redmi K30 5G有很多功能,但我们的评测设备仍然遇到一些问题。忽略了在欧洲使用中国版本的限制,Redmi K30缺乏OLED面板可以提供的显示改进。实际上,这意味着Redmi K30的对比度比其同类产品差,并且它也具有IPS典型的光晕现象。该面板还使用PWM调光。我们评测设备的麦克风也无法说服我们,但第二台评测设备应足以确认这是否是本地化的问题。总体而言,Redmi K30 5G是一款出色的中端智能手机,我们希望很快能在欧洲上市。

Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G - 02/17/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 72%
Weight
88%
Battery
89%
Display
88%
Games Performance
36 / 64 → 56%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 88%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
61%
Average
77%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米K30 5G智能手机评测:拥有120hz屏幕和5G的廉价手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-04-11 (Update: 2020-04-11)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj