联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9笔记本电脑评测。ePrivacy屏幕仍有问题
我们已经测试了目前的第九代ThinkPad X1 Carbon，但早期型号在高负荷下的性能并不稳定。联想同时发布了几个BIOS更新，这就是为什么我们要再次检查性能发展。同时，我们仍然看一下带有集成隐私过滤器的可选ePrivacy显示屏。
关于所有其他信息（外壳、设备和输入设备），我们之前对ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9的评论可供参考。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE (ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-1135G7 4 x 2.4 - 4.2 GHz, 34 W PL2 / Short Burst, 27 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-UP3
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB
, LPDDR4x-4266, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 162 PPI, LEB14201N, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 PCH-LP
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB
, 435 GB free
Weight
1.247 kg, Power Supply: 322 g
Price
2100 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
| 89.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 90.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2400 | |
| 89.1 % v7 (old) | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | ||
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 995 g | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
显示器--ThinkPad，内置隐私过滤器
我们测试设备中的可选ePrivacy屏幕在14英寸的对角线上提供了1920 x 1200像素（16:10）的分辨率。联想表示亮度为500尼特，根据我们的分析（CalMAN & X-Rite i1 Pro 2）可以确认，平均亮度甚至比540cd/m²还要高一点。同时，黑值非常低（0.24），这导致了2400:1的非常好的对比度。
然而，在实践中，主观的画面印象要比这些比率所显示的差很多。由于ePrivacy过滤器的存在，在中心位置看显示器时，只有一个非常小的甜蜜点（即使ePrivacy被禁用）。即使有很小的偏差，对比度和亮度也会明显下降，几乎可以说是灰雾笼罩了整个画面。视角也比普通IPS显示器差很多。
启用和禁用隐私过滤器（Fn + D）之间的差异实际上也不是很大。联想在这里做了点手脚，在启用过滤器时，默认情况下将亮度降低到~160 cd/m²。然后你可以再次增加亮度，但隐私过滤器的效果实际上已经消失。现实上，它只在低亮度水平上带来所需的效果，这可能是个问题，特别是在旅途中。
我们无法确定PWM闪烁（即使启用了ePrivacy过滤器），但响应时间相当慢，在操作过程中你也可以看到重影，例如移动鼠标指针时。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEB14201N tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 576 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 541.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.6 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 577 cd/m²
Contrast: 2400:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
70% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE LEB14201N, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW MNE007A1-2, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 CSOT T3_MNE007ZA1_1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R B140HAN06.B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 68 -2% | 95.2 37% | 75.4 9% | 69.8 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 97.6 -1% | 99.8 1% | 99 0% | 98.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70 | 69.3 -1% | 89.2 27% | 76.4 9% | 71.3 2% |
| Response Times | 10% | 11% | 38% | -3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52.4 ? | 48 ? 8% | 46 ? 12% | 32.8 ? 37% | 60 ? -15% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 28.8 ? 12% | 30 ? 9% | 20.4 ? 38% | 29.6 ? 10% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -27% | 9% | -22% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 576 | 466.4 -19% | 497 -14% | 390 -32% | 437 -24% |
| Brightness | 541 | 426 -21% | 488 -10% | 387 -28% | 421 -22% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 84 -1% | 87 2% | 94 11% | 87 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.32 -33% | 0.35 -46% | 0.29 -21% | 0.29 -21% |
| Contrast | 2400 | 1458 -39% | 1420 -41% | 1345 -44% | 1507 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.84 -29% | 1.2 45% | 2.8 -27% | 1.8 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.3 | 4.73 -10% | 2.1 51% | 4.4 -2% | 3.5 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.4 | 2.27 -62% | 0.9 36% | 1.8 -29% | 1.4 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 3.7 -32% | 1.3 54% | 3.5 -25% | 2.3 18% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.18 101% |
| CCT | 6792 96% | 6886 94% | 6690 97% | 6174 105% | 6782 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 79.37 | 76.4 | 65.4 | ||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.78 | 99 | 98.7 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-16% | 14% /
12% | 7% /
-7% | -2% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏在出厂前已经被校准得相当好，即使启用了电子隐私过滤器，读数也不会恶化。灰度确实显示出轻微的偏色（绿色/蓝色），但这在实践中几乎不可见。通过我们的校准（上面有免费下载的配置文件），我们可以进一步提高数值，由于几乎完全覆盖sRGB，该面板也适合编辑图片/视频。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8471 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
尽管有哑光的表面和高的最大亮度，但隐私过滤器明显地限制了户外使用性。在可视角度的稳定性方面，你也很快看到亮度和对比度的下降。
性能和排放
目前ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9的CPU性能非常好，而 酷睿i5-1135G7由于高TDP限制，也能很好地跟上实际上更快的i7型号。几分钟后，功耗稳定在27瓦左右，这是一个好结果。
然而，在此之前，CPU的性能已经很好了，但我们可以看到在综合负载下，性能下降很厉害。联想现在已经通过BIOS的更新掌握了这一点，从下图中也可以清楚地看到这一点。 Witcher 3图中可以清楚地看到。然而，联想让它自己变得相当容易，在CPU/iGPU联合负载下的性能很快就限制在15瓦。
我们还注意到，现在的风扇曲线工作得更积极了。即使在日常工作中，也经常可以听到安静的嘶嘶声，在更多的负载下（甚至在游戏时），冷却很快就达到了最大的40.9 dB(A)，这使得它的声音明显高于 第一个测试设备的酷睿i7.
Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø763 (710.29-890.99)
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø718 (665.15-755.62)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø834 (823.11-884.45)
SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø886 (876-943.04)
Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø837 (823.72-913.58)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA -2! | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2786 - 6136, n=55) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1062 - 1373, n=53) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (979 - 2382, n=62) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (375 - 527, n=62) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (431 - 941, n=65) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (141.4 - 205, n=61) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (499 - 1044, n=60) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (14745 - 24873, n=62) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3924 - 4921, n=62) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3475 - 5472, n=58) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1147 - 1428, n=58) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3.57 - 7.6, n=57) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (44.2 - 62.9, n=60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (0.619 - 0.727, n=59) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=68, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (4313 - 7952, n=45) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19402 - 32283, n=45) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (1316 - 2172, n=45) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (39000 - 46951, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (3497 - 4445, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (12569 - 19635, n=45) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (28988 - 67977, n=45) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (265 - 373, n=51) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (2226 - 4291, n=45) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (9004 - 45366, n=45) | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (4026 - 4952, n=53) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (8149 - 9917, n=53) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (5040 - 6619, n=53) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (3548 - 5255, n=53) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (17443 - 63889, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (19716 - 63705, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (18722 - 66778, n=45) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Core i5-1135G7 (68.3 - 107, n=51) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6838 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4808 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
659 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
507 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
89.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
229 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8:
2015 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8:
2414 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R | |
| HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW -1! | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE | |
| Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6087 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18583 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4021 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1508 points | |
Help | ||
Witcher 3 FPS-Diagram
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs: Ø10.6 (9-12)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 85 | 53 | 28 | 10.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 123 | 74.7 | 51.6 | 47.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39.9 | 21 | 15.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.1 | 32.3 | 29.7 |
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.9 / 40.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER Vision 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Asus ExpertBook B9 B9400CE-KC0166R Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 14% | 8% | -1% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 24.7 | 24.1 2% | 23.66 4% | 25 -1% | 24 3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24.7 | 24.2 2% | 23.6 4% | 25 -1% | 24 3% |
| Idle Average * | 24.7 | 24.2 2% | 23.6 4% | 25 -1% | 24 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 24.2 2% | 23.6 4% | 26.9 -9% | 24 3% |
| Load Average * | 40.9 | 26.9 34% | 33.5 18% | 38.6 6% | 47.5 -16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.9 | 27.9 32% | 41.2 -1% | 47.5 -16% | |
| Load Maximum * | 40.9 | 29.9 27% | 34.3 16% | 41.2 -1% | 47.5 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 840 Aero G8 3E4Q6AA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.43 / 0.71 Watt |
| Idle | 3.5 / 7.4 / 8.5 Watt |
| Load |
40.2 / 65.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø33.4 (31.8-40.5)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø47.2 (34.8-65.7)
电池寿命
在我们的WLAN测试中，我们确定电池运行时间为10小时，调整亮度为150cd/m²，使用最大亮度时仍为7小时。这使测试设备几乎处于比较组的中场，也处于X1 Carbon G9的其他两个版本之间。高分辨率的4K型号在同样的测试中仅能维持7小时和5小时，而没有隐私过滤器的普通全高清面板分别能维持11.5小时和9.5小时。
Pros
+ 高品质外壳
+ 哑光16:10面板，无PWM
+ 非常好的系统性能
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 许多端口，包括Thunderbolt 4和PCIe 4.0
+ 良好的输入设备
Cons
- BIOS更新后，风扇的声音变大了
- 有限制的隐私显示
- 糟糕的网络摄像头
- 没有SD读卡器
结论 - X1 Carbon的冷却仍然需要改进
联想能够解决处理器和显卡同时加载时的性能问题，但这是以相当低的TDP限制和明显更响的风扇为代价的。制造商肯定应该在下一代产品中对此进行改进。
可选的ePrivacy显示屏仍然是一个问题。原则上，测量值还可以，面板可以说服人，特别是在亮度方面。色彩准确度也处于良好水平，可以处理sRGB色彩空间的图片（完全覆盖）。然而，由于内置的隐私过滤器，当你非常集中地看显示器时，只有一个相对较小的甜蜜点。只要你稍微改变角度（水平或垂直），就会出现明显的亮度和对比度损失。它几乎看起来就像一个灰色的雾气覆盖在画面上。此外，隐私过滤器的效果也很有限。它当然会限制从侧面看去的视线，但它只有在低亮度水平下才能真正合理地发挥作用，这显然不是在旅途中的最佳状态。联想在这里也做了一些手脚，一旦你激活过滤器，默认情况下会将亮度降低到160cd/m²左右。你可以再次增加亮度，但视觉保护会明显下降。
联想已经稳定了性能，但现在风扇的声音反倒大了。内置的隐私过滤器提供了一定的保护，防止不需要的目光，但你必须考虑到一般图片质量的限制。
对于大多数用户来说，我们当然会选择普通的 全高清面板.惠普提供的 EliteBook 840也提供了一个内置的隐私过滤器（SureView技术），但这里的画质也有限制。
价格和可用性
除其他外，ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9的评测样品可在Cyberport售价2,140欧元（约合2,455美元）。
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XW0089GE
- 11/09/2021 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Price comparison
