Notebookcheck

联想ThinkPad E14笔记本电脑评测:轻薄设计打败了可升级性

有副作用的减重。 联想为其廉价ThinkPad E系列配备了更新的,更薄的模具,该机使用了更多的铝。这似乎是一种改进,但实际上这也意味着失去了一些功能。 除此之外, ThinkPad E14非常类似于其前身ThinkPad E490。
Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Zewei Shen),
Business Comet Lake Laptop / Notebook ThinkPad Windows Ultrabook
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE (ThinkPad E14 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-10210U 4 x 1.6 - 4.2 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2400, 1 SO-DIMM slot
Display
14 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, NV140FHM-N48, IPS LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe, 437 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 组合音频, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 325 x 232
Battery
45 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2W扬声器, Keyboard: 六排背光键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W Type-C 充电, Lenovo Vantage, Microsoft Office Trial, McAfee, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.648 kg, Power Supply: 347 g
Price
865 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
05/2020
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
1.6 kg17.9 mm14"1920x1080
86 %
08/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
1.8 kg19.9 mm14"1920x1080
81 %
03/2020
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250
1.2 kg16 mm14"1920x1080
83 %
Dell Latitude 3400
i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620
1.7 kg18.65 mm14"1920x1080
88 %
08/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620
1.4 kg17.9 mm14"1920x1080
Right: USB 2.0 Type-A, RJ45 Ethernet, Kensington lock
Right: USB 2.0 Type-A, RJ45 Ethernet, Kensington lock
Left: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, combo audio
Left: USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C, 2x USB 3.0 Type-A, HDMI, combo audio
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
935 (472min - 956max) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
658 (605min - 676max) MBit/s ∼70% -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 MBit/s ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
582 MBit/s ∼62% -38%
Average of class Office
  (5 - 1722, n=274)
560 MBit/s ∼60% -40%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
676 MBit/s ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
662 MBit/s ∼98% +3%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 (490min - 685max) MBit/s ∼95% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
640 (581min - 690max) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Office
  (34 - 1775, n=273)
519 MBit/s ∼77% -19%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø918 (472-956)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø640 (581-690)
277
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
282
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
310
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NV140FHM-N48
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 310 cd/m² Average: 291.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 308 cd/m²
Contrast: 1794:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 38.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
NV140FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Lenovo NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 3400
BOE NV14N4H, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
NE140FHM-N61, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Response Times
3%
645%
-4%
14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
52 (26, 26)
48.4 (25.2, 23.2)
7%
39.2 (20.8, 18.4)
25%
44 (22, 22)
15%
71.2 (33.2, 38)
-37%
Response Time Black / White *
39.2 (22, 17.2)
38.4 (21.2, 17.2)
2%
35.6 (21.2, 14.4)
9%
42 (28, 14)
-7%
44.8 (21.2, 23.6)
-14%
PWM Frequency
1250 (99)
1250 (99)
0%
25000 (28)
1900%
1000 (90)
-20%
2427 (50)
94%
Screen
-1%
31%
-16%
20%
Brightness middle
305
305
0%
324.1
6%
240
-21%
428
40%
Brightness
292
295
1%
301
3%
227
-22%
409
40%
Brightness Distribution
89
90
1%
87
-2%
79
-11%
91
2%
Black Level *
0.17
0.23
-35%
0.22
-29%
0.48
-182%
0.29
-71%
Contrast
1794
1326
-26%
1473
-18%
500
-72%
1476
-18%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.9
5.3
10%
1.63
72%
4.2
29%
4.6
22%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
18.4
18.9
-3%
4.25
77%
7.16
61%
8.2
55%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.6
5
-9%
1.42
69%
2
57%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.4
2.3
48%
2.2
50%
1.75
60%
5.4
-23%
Gamma
2.05 107%
2.09 105%
2.26 97%
2.36 93%
2.09 105%
CCT
6921 94%
6246 104%
6887 94%
6387 102%
7562 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.2
37.7
-1%
60.2
58%
38
-1%
60
57%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
59.6
58.2
-2%
95
59%
59
-1%
92.2
55%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / -1%
338% / 163%
-10% / -13%
17% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1250 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1250 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17699 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
LatencyMon
LatencyMon
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø526 (486.23-547.65)
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø487 (483.41-509.01)
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø565 (559.89-595.69)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø617 (613-650)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
170 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U
  (154 - 174, n=26)
167 Points ∼98% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel Core i5-10210U
166 Points ∼98%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel Core i5-8265U
163 Points ∼96% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel Core i5-8265U
160 Points ∼94% -4%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
154 Points ∼91% -7%
Average of class Office
  (20 - 202, n=594)
117 Points ∼69% -30%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i5-10210U
  (479 - 790, n=26)
625 Points ∼100% +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel Core i5-8265U
617 (613min - 658max) Points ∼99% +13%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Intel Core i5-10210U
596 Points ∼95% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel Core i5-10210U
548 (486.23min - 547.65max) Points ∼88%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel Core i5-8265U
509 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Office
  (36 - 1346, n=602)
373 Points ∼60% -32%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel Core i3-8145U
350 Points ∼56% -36%
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
548 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
47.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
166 Points
Help
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4461 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (2487 - 4463, n=21)
3116 Points ∼70% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
3036 Points ∼68% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3015 Points ∼68%
Average of class Office
  (320 - 5547, n=208)
2826 Points ∼63% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
2693 Points ∼60% -11%
Dell Latitude 3400
UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2433 Points ∼55% -19%
Productivity
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7040 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6099 - 7317, n=21)
6736 Points ∼96% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
6563 Points ∼93%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
6339 Points ∼90% -3%
Dell Latitude 3400
UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
6096 Points ∼87% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
6083 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Office
  (1266 - 8567, n=208)
5767 Points ∼82% -12%
Essentials
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (7172 - 10000, n=21)
8633 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
8149 Points ∼94%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
7861 Points ∼91% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
7529 Points ∼87% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
7471 Points ∼87% -8%
Average of class Office
  (2683 - 9846, n=208)
7340 Points ∼85% -10%
Dell Latitude 3400
UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
7185 Points ∼83% -12%
Score
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4497 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3752 - 4353, n=21)
4048 Points ∼90% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3901 Points ∼87%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
3704 Points ∼82% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
3617 Points ∼80% -7%
Average of class Office
  (803 - 5409, n=209)
3472 Points ∼77% -11%
Dell Latitude 3400
UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
3399 Points ∼76% -13%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
5001 Points ∼100%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
4992 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (4286 - 5114, n=17)
4911 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
4824 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
4637 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Latitude 3400
UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
4552 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Office
  (1226 - 5570, n=394)
4115 Points ∼82% -18%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
3666 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (3182 - 4284, n=17)
3658 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
3464 Points ∼94% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
3436 Points ∼94% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
3402 Points ∼93%
Average of class Office
  (1169 - 4770, n=456)
3116 Points ∼85% -8%
Dell Latitude 3400
UHD Graphics 620, i3-8145U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
2959 Points ∼81% -13%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3402 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5001 points
Help
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ
Dell Latitude 3400
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G
Average SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-9%
-2%
9%
24%
-9%
Write 4K
121.9
110.7
-9%
107.7
-12%
107.9
-11%
119.9
-2%
110 (89.3 - 122, n=3)
-10%
Read 4K
42.66
41.02
-4%
39.73
-7%
40.27
-6%
39.94
-6%
40.6 (37.4 - 42.7, n=3)
-5%
Write Seq
628.3
756.6
20%
926.3
47%
1253
99%
1334
112%
677 (608 - 796, n=3)
8%
Read Seq
1193
1037
-13%
1014
-15%
1298
9%
1357
14%
1104 (1019 - 1193, n=3)
-7%
Write 4K Q32T1
590.3
359
-39%
343.6
-42%
415
-30%
311.2
-47%
438 (235 - 590, n=3)
-26%
Read 4K Q32T1
414.5
402.4
-3%
499.1
20%
313.3
-24%
400.6
-3%
338 (285 - 415, n=3)
-18%
Write Seq Q32T1
866
832.6
-4%
1033
19%
1297
50%
1642
90%
860 (842 - 872, n=3)
-1%
Read Seq Q32T1
2078
1635
-21%
1604
-23%
1728
-17%
2778
34%
1786 (1635 - 2078, n=3)
-14%
SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A
Sequential Read: 1215 MB/s
Sequential Write: 659.5 MB/s
512K Read: 1129 MB/s
512K Write: 703.1 MB/s
4K Read: 46.71 MB/s
4K Write: 123.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 375.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 514.3 MB/s
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
4920 Points ∼100% +178%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1768 Points ∼36%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=221)
1741 Points ∼35% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1718 Points ∼35% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1666 Points ∼34% -6%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
1461 Points ∼30% -17%
Average of class Office
  (185 - 5422, n=715)
1421 Points ∼29% -20%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
1164 Points ∼100%
Average of class Office
  (76 - 1164, n=95)
518 Points ∼45%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 443, n=72)
378 Points ∼32%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
348 Points ∼30%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
310 Points ∼27%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
3845 Points ∼100% +229%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
1168 Points ∼30%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1418, n=190)
1152 Points ∼30% -1%
Average of class Office
  (138 - 4109, n=531)
1091 Points ∼28% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1071 Points ∼28% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
1008 Points ∼26% -14%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
942 Points ∼24% -19%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i5-10210U
23376 Points ∼100% +158%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=202)
9229 Points ∼39% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-10210U
9050 Points ∼39%
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
8559 Points ∼37% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U
8448 Points ∼36% -7%
Dell Latitude 3400
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i3-8145U
7496 Points ∼32% -17%
Average of class Office
  (1208 - 27117, n=573)
7486 Points ∼32% -17%
3DMark 11 Performance
1938 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
8057 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1072 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 59.76 33.23 27.38 8.74 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 68.7 40.7 19.3 17.1 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 20.6 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 10.6 9.02 8.8 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 23.4 fps

Noise Level

Idle
29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB(A)
Load
29.5 / 29.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.429.531.629.42525.828.223.824.83127.329.327.528.94025.228.62526.7502524.425.923.26323.424.622.924.38022.823.322.922.810024.32623.924.112524.825.524.123.516024.62524.323.920023.223.82422.925022.423.523.323.131521.621.621.721.740021.120.420.521.35002020.52020.763019.819.518.819.880019.319.318.318.7100019.118.919.319.1125018.317.717.118.7160018.817.216.218.5200017.616.616.217.8250017.816.215.517.7315016.115.615.216.1400015.415.215.115.5500015.215.115.115.363001515.215.11580001515.115.115.11000015151514.91250014.81514.914.81600014.614.714.614.5SPL29.929.529.229.9N1.31.31.21.3median 18.8median 17.7median 17.1median 18.7Delta3.43.82.93.530.33130.329.82729.424.627.230.227.728.328.328.227.527.524.124.726.225.123.325.824.825.223.52423.523.122.724.523.122.922.723.323.421.721.622.522.222.122.22323.42222.321.32221.322.121.220.72121.721.52120.620.921.421.120.220.720.920.219.420.120.42018.920.619.919.318.319.920.419.417.920.119.818.517.119.518.917.816.718.818.217.216.217.91716.416.11717.516.715.817.41716.315.61716.115.815.41615.815.715.515.915.715.515.415.615.415.415.215.415.215.114.815.130.930.229.430.71.51.41.21.4median 19.9median 19.3median 17.9median 19.92.32.62.52hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGELenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
Max. Load
 39.1 °C39.7 °C41.7 °C 
 38.1 °C38.8 °C36.5 °C 
 29.7 °C30 °C29.5 °C 
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
40.3 °C39.2 °C37.7 °C
34.4 °C37.5 °C36.7 °C
30.4 °C31.5 °C30.9 °C
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.6 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 29.4 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.4 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.633.52523.827.73127.529.4402526.65025.926.16322.925.18022.923.210023.925.212524.123.916024.3262002437.425023.34931521.755.540020.554.65002052.563018.849.980018.353.9100019.362.1125017.165.6160016.267.1200016.265.7250015.559.5315015.262.4400015.154.7500015.153.4630015.149800015.155.5100001554.41250014.948.31600014.644.5SPL29.273.6N1.228.3median 17.1median 53.9Delta2.94.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGEApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 9% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.47 / 0.77 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.01 / 6.32 / 8.78 Watt
Load midlight 32.5 / 45.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Dell Latitude 3400
i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
11%
-32%
12%
5%
-10%
-58%
Idle Minimum *
3.01
2.76
8%
4.2
-40%
2.4
20%
2.34
22%
3.8 (1 - 12.4, n=232)
-26%
7.37 (1.3 - 32, n=1025)
-145%
Idle Average *
6.32
5.96
6%
5.9
7%
4.9
22%
5.22
17%
6.97 (2.8 - 15.7, n=234)
-10%
11.1 (3.7 - 42, n=1025)
-76%
Idle Maximum *
8.78
6.57
25%
7.2
18%
7.4
16%
8.82
-0%
8.73 (3.8 - 16.6, n=232)
1%
13.5 (4.8 - 67, n=1025)
-54%
Load Average *
32.5
28.2
13%
63.4
-95%
31
5%
35.8
-10%
35.4 (8.1 - 51.6, n=232)
-9%
37.2 (7.43 - 99.3, n=1010)
-14%
Load Maximum *
45.5
43.6
4%
67.4
-48%
47
-3%
47.3
-4%
47.1 (22 - 96.3, n=234)
-4%
46.3 (12.2 - 129, n=1012)
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
53.5

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge)
8h 27min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge)
6h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 40min
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US
i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE
i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Dell Latitude 3400
i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
8%
4%
28%
15%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1063
986
591 (101 - 3537, n=820)
H.264
617
687
11%
677
10%
451 (139 - 882, n=206)
-27%
WiFi v1.3
507
485
-4%
515
2%
572
13%
584
15%
428 (105 - 1124, n=410)
-16%
Load
100
117
17%
105
5%
161
61%
102 (37 - 259, n=789)
2%

Pros

+ 铝制机身提高了做工
+ 非常舒适的输入设备
+ 续航时间长
+ 非常安静,低温
+ 大容量存储升级

Cons

- 屏幕色域低
- 比前代少1个RAM插槽
- 不再有microSD卡插槽
- 只有12个月的保修
- 关上屏幕时发出吱吱声
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E14. Test sample supplied by
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E14. Test sample supplied by

联想通过新的ThinkPad E14继续发展E系列:较薄的机身从旧款ThinkPad E490汲取了很多设计灵感,并因此发挥了许多优势。其中之一:出色的ThinkPad输入设备。其他包括即使在负载下也具有良好的续航时间和较低的发热量/噪音水平。ThinkPad E14仍然可以升级,尤其是在存储方面。另外,由于增加了铝的使用,触感也得到了改善。

不幸的是,还有一些退步的地方:microSD卡插槽已被移除。 RAM的可升级性也受到限制:E14不再提供了两个SO-DIMM插槽和最多64 GB的双通道内存,而是提供了一个RAM插槽和最多32 GB的单通道内存。其他不利因素包括12个月的保修期和屏幕覆盖色域差的问题。令人担忧的是关闭屏幕时铰链区域发出的吱吱声–做工绝对不是完美的。

确实没有比老款更好:联想ThinkPad E14不必要地删除了某些功能。

总体而言,尽管存在缺陷,我们仍然推荐联想ThinkPad E14因为它仍然是一台坚固的ThinkPad笔记本电脑,尽管存在一些缺点-尽管我们确实认为它由于功能的缺失而不像前代ThinkPad E490那样吸引人。

Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE - 03/03/2020 v7
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
88%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
58 / 80 → 73%
Weight
67 / 20-75 → 86%
Battery
84%
Display
82%
Games Performance
51 / 78 → 65%
Application Performance
81 / 95 → 86%
Temperature
92%
Noise
99%
Audio
57%
Camera
31 / 85 → 37%
Average
74%
85%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad E14笔记本电脑评测:轻薄设计打败了可升级性
Benjamin Herzig, 2020-05- 2 (Update: 2020-05- 2)
Benjamin Herzig
Editor of the original article: Benjamin Herzig - Editor