华硕TUF FX505DY（Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X）笔记本电脑•评测•

Name: Asus TUF FX505DY
Brand: Asus

终于有了台还可以的AMD游戏本。 实在不想再看到i5-8300H和GTX 1050的笔记本了？不妨试试这个价值700美元的AMD替代品。尽管晚了点，但这也是Ryzen Zen +平台的第一次亮相。

Allen Ngo, 👁 Allen Ngo (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 04/21/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Ryzen (Zen) Laptop / Notebook

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus TUF FX505DY (TUF FX505D Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 4 x 2.1 - 3.7 GHz, Picasso-U (Zen+)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1223 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR5, 25.20.15025.1002 (Adrenalin 19.2.3)

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4-2666, 17-17-39, 单通道

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, NCP002D, glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, 256 GB

Soundcard

AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 26.8 x 360.4 x 262

Battery

48 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Additional features

Speakers: 2 W立体声, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe, AMD Display Optimizations, Graphics Profile, Asus Armoury Crate, Keyboard Hotkeys, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.2 kg, Power Supply: 480 g

Price

700 USD

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Asus FX504GD Gigabyte Sabre 15G Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Asus TUF FX505DY DIN A4 ❌

Left: AC adapter, Gigabit RJ-45, HDMI 2.0, USB 2.0 Type-A, 2x USB Type-A 3.1 Gen. 1, 3.5 mm combo audio

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Intel Wireless-AC 9560	660 MBit/s +147%
Asus FX504GD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	614 MBit/s +130%
Asus TUF FX505DY Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	267 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	144 (113^min - 190^max) MBit/s -46%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus FX504GD Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 MBit/s +103%
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Intel Wireless-AC 9560	626 MBit/s +93%
Asus TUF FX505DY Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	324 MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	293 (186^min - 315^max) MBit/s -10%


223.5 cd/m²	215.3 cd/m²	197.3 cd/m²
199 cd/m²	211.5 cd/m²	182.8 cd/m²
185.7 cd/m²	200 cd/m²	185.8 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Panda LM156LF-CL03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 223.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 200.1 cd/m² Minimum: 10.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 211.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 920:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.16
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.04% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus TUF FX505DY Panda LM156LF-CL03, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Chi Mei CMN15F4 (N156HHE-GA1 CMN), TN LED, 120 Hz, 15.60, 1920x1080	Asus FX504GD AU Optronics B156HTN03.8, TN LED, 15.60, 1920x1080	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH LG Display LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AU Optronics B156HAN06.0 (AUO60ED), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080	Gigabyte Sabre 15G ID: LGD0533, Name: LG Display LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Display		101%	-7%	55%	53%	-3%
Display P3 Coverage	40.04	91.5 129%	37.09 -7%	62.5 56%	63.4 58%	38.97 -3%
sRGB Coverage	60.2	100 66%	55.8 -7%	93 54%	87.4 45%	58.2 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	41.4	85.9 107%	38.34 -7%	63.8 54%	64 55%	40.3 -3%
Response Times		48%	29%	66%	-7%	14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44.8 ?(18.8, 26)	24 ?(12.8, 11.2) 46%	41.6 ?(19.6, 22) 7%	15 ?(8, 7) 67%	48.4 ?(24, 24.4) -8%	32 ?(16.4, 15.6) 29%
Response Time Black / White *	30.8 ?(17.6, 13.2)	8.4 ?(6, 2.4) 73%	15.2 ?(10, 5.2) 51%	11 ?(7, 4) 64%	32.8 ?(18, 14.8) -6%	25.6 ?(15.6, 10) 17%
PWM Frequency	20830 ?(30)	26040 ?(19) 25%				20000 ?(99) -4%
Screen		-5%	-34%	10%	19%	-25%
Brightness middle	211.5	368.5 74%	260 23%	305 44%	299 41%	248.4 17%
Brightness	200	341 71%	241 21%	284 42%	284 42%	241 21%
Brightness Distribution	82	87 6%	85 4%	83 1%	88 7%	84 2%
Black Level *	0.23	0.34 -48%	0.55 -139%	0.52 -126%	0.24 -4%	0.3 -30%
Contrast	920	1084 18%	473 -49%	587 -36%	1246 35%	828 -10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.92	8.91 -127%	7 -79%	3.63 7%	4.98 -27%	7.5 -91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.63	14.39 18%	22.52 -28%	8.18 54%	7.67 56%	25.2 -43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.16	2.87 31%	5.27 -27%	1.31 69%	3.7 11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	12 -287%	6.1 -97%	4.77 -54%	4.58 -48%	6.5 -110%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	1.825 ^121%	1.97 ^112%	2.54 ^87%	2.55 ^86%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	6578 ^99%	11519 ^56%	7894 ^82%	7500 ^87%	6397 ^102%	7852 ^83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	38.1	85.94 126%	35.5 -7%	59 55%	57 50%	37 -3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60	99.98 67%	61 2%	93 55%	87 45%	57.9 -3%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		48% / 23%	-4% / -21%	44% / 25%	22% / 22%	-5% / -14%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.6 ms rise
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.8 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

20830 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 20830 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 20830 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17915 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø725 (718.93-754.96)

MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø892 (884.49-963.04)

Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø605 (578.56-609.13)

Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø658 (642.69-661.47)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U	191 Points +32%
Dell Precision 7530 Intel Core i9-8950HK	187 Points +29%
Asus FX504GD Intel Core i5-8300H	170 Points +17%
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Intel Core i7-8750H	170 Points +17%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Core i7-7700HQ	161 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	150 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE Intel Core i5-7300HQ	147 Points +1%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	145 Points
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	144 Points -1%
Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	138 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700	1408 Points +86%
Dell Precision 7530 Intel Core i9-8950HK	1193 Points +58%
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Intel Core i7-8750H	964 Points +27%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U	815 Points +8%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H	757 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 15G Intel Core i7-7700HQ	736 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U	661 Points -13%
Asus FX504GD Intel Core i5-8300H	609 Points -20%
Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	576 Points -24%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE Intel Core i5-7300HQ	501 Points -34%

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

7839

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20097

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

4575

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

74 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.65 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

8.55 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

145 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

87.7 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

757 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5125 Points +16%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4405 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	4364 Points -1%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	3808 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	3763 Points -15%
Essentials
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	8702 Points +9%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	7949 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	7542 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	6733 Points -15%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	6583 Points -17%
Productivity
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7019 Points +9%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	6749 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	6446 Points
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	5927 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	5574 Points -14%
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5983 Points +32%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4528 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	4432 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	3855 Points -15%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	3843 Points -15%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	4560 Points
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4440 Points -3%
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	4415 Points -3%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	3909 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	3860 Points -15%
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	3431 Points -25%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5543 Points +6%
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	5354 Points +3%
Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	5223 Points
Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128	5063 Points -3%
Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	5018 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	4810 Points -8%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4560 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5223 points
PCMark 10 Score		4405 points
Help

	Asus TUF FX505DY WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	Gigabyte Sabre 15G Liteonit CV3-8D128
AS SSD		-60%	-1%	-119%	-60%
Seq Read	1059	504 -52%	1808 71%	470.8 -56%	516 -51%
Seq Write	1180	462.9 -61%	1429 21%	126.8 -89%	479.8 -59%
4K Read	37.55	21.88 -42%	46.1 23%	23.64 -37%	28.3 -25%
4K Write	110.6	60.8 -45%	97 -12%	54.5 -51%	53.8 -51%
4K-64 Read	619	253 -59%	536 -13%	203.1 -67%	257 -58%
4K-64 Write	502	137.8 -73%	273.6 -45%	127.1 -75%	132.2 -74%
Access Time Read *	0.087	0.155 -78%	0.085 2%	0.121 -39%	0.141 -62%
Access Time Write *	0.034	0.072 -112%	0.038 -12%	0.269 -691%	0.073 -115%
Score Read	762	325 -57%	763 0%	274 -64%	337 -56%
Score Write	730	245 -66%	514 -30%	194 -73%	234 -68%
Score Total	1899	742 -61%	1663 -12%	600 -68%	752 -60%
Copy ISO MB/s	1166	690 -41%			446.8 -62%
Copy Program MB/s	507	328.1 -35%			195.3 -61%
Copy Game MB/s	480.3	220.7 -54%			323.5 -33%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1734 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1302 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 311.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 207.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1373 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1302 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.19 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 129.8 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	11332 Points +79%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R7 1700	11010 Points +74%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	10248 Points +62%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H	8004 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG P506 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7595 Points +20%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	7355 Points +16%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	6356 Points 0%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	6327 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U	6262 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ	5738 Points -9%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	5622 Points -11%
Asus GL552VW-DK725T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4326 Points -32%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2328 Points -63%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	3626 Points +103%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R7 1700	3440 Points +92%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	2908 Points +62%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	1790 Points
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	1597 Points -11%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R7 1700	15264 Points +87%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	14302 Points +75%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	12620 Points +54%
SCHENKER XMG P506 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9967 Points +22%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	9862 Points +21%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H	9805 Points +20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U	8451 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ	8345 Points +2%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	8181 Points
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7133 Points -13%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	7016 Points -14%
Asus GL552VW-DK725T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5384 Points -34%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	3482 Points -57%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH, i7-8809G	10391 Points +61%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop), R7 1700	8946 Points +39%
SCHENKER XMG P506 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	8271 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H	7932 Points +23%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870, i5-8305G	7788 Points +21%
Asus FX504GD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H	7025 Points +9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H	6839 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, i7-8565U	6774 Points +5%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H	6447 Points
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7300HQ	5933 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U	5792 Points -10%
Asus GL552VW-DK725T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5378 Points -17%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 2500U	2597 Points -60%

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark 06 Standard Score		25730 points
3DMark 11 Performance		7714 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		57356 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		18476 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5515 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1925 points
Help

... in comparison

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	42.3 fps +86%
Asus GL702ZC-GC104T AMD Ryzen 7 1700, AMD Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)	37.4 (31^min) fps +65%
Intel Hades Canyon NUC8i7HVK Intel Core i7-8809G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH	34.3 (32^min - 37^max) fps +51%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX533FD Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q	30 fps +32%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	27.9 fps +23%
SCHENKER XMG P506 Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	25.7 fps +13%
Dell XPS 15 9575 i5-8305G Intel Core i5-8305G, AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870	23.7 fps +4%
Asus TUF FX505DY AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	22.7 fps
Asus FX504GD Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile	22.2 fps -2%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBA-80WY001VGE Intel Core i5-7300HQ, AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)	20.7 fps -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 AMD Ryzen 7 2700U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)	20.6 fps -9%
Asus GL552VW-DK725T Intel Core i7-6700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M	14 fps -38%

Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G: Ø36.6 (32-39)

Average of class Gaming : Ø196.1 (188.9-214)

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	134.3	118	114	53.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	108.8	70.3	38.5	22.7
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	108.6	65.7	35.3	26.6

	Asus TUF FX505DY Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R5 3550H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G	MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ	Asus FX504GD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), R7 2700U, SK Hynix HFS128G39TND	Gigabyte Sabre 15G GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Liteonit CV3-8D128
Noise		-6%	1%	-2%	1%	-9%
off / environment *	28.2	28.4 -1%	28.1 -0%	30.2 -7%	29 -3%	28.2 -0%
Idle Minimum *	28.2	32.8 -16%	29 -3%	30.9 -10%	29 -3%	33 -17%
Idle Average *	28.2	32.8 -16%	29.2 -4%	30.9 -10%	31 -10%	33.3 -18%
Idle Maximum *	28.2	33 -17%	29.7 -5%	31.6 -12%	32 -13%	34.7 -23%
Load Average *	43.9	35.8 18%	44.3 -1%	42.3 4%	36 18%	44.5 -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49	51 -4%	40.7 17%		44 10%	49.2 -0%
Load Maximum *	50.6	52.3 -3%	47.7 6%	40 21%	46 9%	52.8 -4%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle		28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB(A)
Load		43.9 / 50.6 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


34.2 °C	37 °C	34.8 °C
30 °C	44.2 °C	27 °C
22.8 °C	27.4 °C	23.4 °C

Maximum: 44.2 °C
Average: 31.2 °C


49.4 °C	37.6 °C	39.2 °C
35 °C	46.4 °C	32.4 °C
27.2 °C	29.8 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 49.4 °C
Average: 36 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25 °C	26 °C	23.8 °C
24.6 °C	25 °C	24.6 °C
22.8 °C	24 °C	22 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Average: 24.2 °C


27.2 °C	27.2 °C	28.4 °C
30.8 °C	28 °C	24.6 °C
23.4 °C	23.6 °C	22 °C

Maximum: 30.8 °C
Average: 26.1 °C

Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


30.2 °C	35 °C	32.2 °C
25.8 °C	37.4 °C	25.8 °C
22.6 °C	24.4 °C	22.6 °C

Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 28.4 °C


42.2 °C	30 °C	36 °C
28 °C	37.8 °C	26 °C
23.4 °C	25.2 °C	23.6 °C

Maximum: 42.2 °C
Average: 30.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 34 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.4 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus TUF FX505DY audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.42 / 0.86 Watt
Idle	5.2 / 7.5 / 9.4 Watt
Load	73 / 120.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus TUF FX505DY R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ, TN LED, 120 Hz, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus FX504GD i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LX015-1U7172, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 R7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), SK Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Liteonit CV3-8D128, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Power Consumption		-52%	-18%	-42%	-30%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	5.2	7.99 -54%	7.2 -38%	7.3 -40%	7 -35%	8 -54%
Idle Average *	7.5	12.15 -62%	10.2 -36%	11.1 -48%	10 -33%	10.9 -45%
Idle Maximum *	9.4	13.4 -43%	10.9 -16%	12.6 -34%	18 -91%	11 -17%
Load Average *	73	103.62 -42%	93.3 -28%	109 -49%	79 -8%	76.7 -5%
Witcher 3 ultra *	90	156.1 -73%	95.8 -6%		98 -9%	94.9 -5%
Load Maximum *	120.7	164.29 -36%	102.5 15%	168 -39%	128 -6%	106.4 12%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		8h 40min
WiFi Websurfing		5h 27min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 37min

	Asus TUF FX505DY R5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 48 Wh	MSI GP63 Leopard 8RE-013US i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 51 Wh	Asus FX504GD i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh	Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 52 Wh	Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 R7 2700U, Radeon RX 560X (Laptop), 48 Wh	Gigabyte Sabre 15G i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 47 Wh
Battery Runtime		-24%	-29%	-36%	4%	-15%
Reader / Idle	520	451 -13%	449 -14%	495 -5%		493 -5%
WiFi v1.3	327	286 -13%	223 -32%	228 -30%	340 4%	261 -20%
Load	97	52 -46%	56 -42%	26 -73%		77 -21%

Pros

+ CPU性能出色发热低

+ 出厂校色准

+ 游戏性能对得起这个价格

+ 可维护性高

+ 不错的续航时间

+ 价格便宜

Cons

- 屏幕亮度低，户外可视度一般

- 键盘反馈模糊

- 游戏时风扇声音响

- 没有SD卡读卡器和USB TypeC

- Radeon Polaris GPU架构老

- 右侧没有接口

- 扬声器一般

- 只有一根WLAN天线

- 机身不稳固

TUF FX505DY是我们测试过的最平衡的AMD游戏笔记本电脑。Strix GL702ZC配备了高端CPU与中档GPU，而FX550IU配备了低端CPU和中档GPU，但FX505DY成功地将中档Ryzen 5 3550H与中档Radeon RX 560X结合在一起，打造了一台廉价的1080p游戏本。其整体性能与英特尔酷睿i5-8300H和GeForce GTX 1050组合的游戏笔记本电脑相当，但价格更低，这正是AMD和华硕对于这款新TUF笔记本的目标。

这台电脑的主要问题是时机问题。配备GTX 1050甚至1050 Ti GPU的笔记本电脑价格一直在下降，以为RTX笔记本电脑腾出空间。现在以类似的价格发现性能相当的系统并不难。如果在一年前，当1050价格还比较高的时候推出FX505DY，那么它便是一台更具吸引力的替代产品。

由于上述原因，FX505DY在竞争中没有任何重大优势，但它也不是一个不好的选择。它是第一款真正能和Intel-Nvidia产品正面竞争的笔记本，这非常重要。作为市场上第一款Zen +游戏笔记本电脑，它展示了未来Ryzen游戏笔记本电脑可以带来的许多好处。我们仍然希望Ryzen-Nvidia笔记本电脑可以真正削弱英特尔的统治地位。

强大的Ryzen Zen +在笔记本上首次亮相，但来得有点晚了。华硕TUF FX505DY是英特尔酷睿i5-8300H和GTX 1050的理想替代品。该系统有望在不久的将来为Ryzen-Turing游戏笔记本电脑铺平道路，并且在价格上明显优于Intel产品。

Asus TUF FX505DY - 2019-03-08 03/08/2019 v6^(old)
Allen Ngo

Chassis

76 / 98 → 78%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

75%

Connectivity

41 / 81 → 51%

Weight

62 / 10-66 → 92%

Battery

84%

Display

82%

Games Performance

86%

Application Performance

93%

Temperature

91 / 95 → 95%

Noise

83 / 90 → 92%

Audio

50%

Camera

50 / 85 → 59%

Average

74%

80%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5190 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388017 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕TUF FX505DY（Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X）笔记本电脑•评测•

Allen Ngo, 2019-04-21 (Update: 2019-04-21)

华硕TUF FX505DY（Ryzen 5 3550H, Radeon RX 560X）笔记本电脑•评测•

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Asus TUF FX505DY audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare