惠普 Pavilion 17-x110ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Name: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Brand: HP

17英寸多媒体笔记本电脑！ 多媒体笔记本电脑是非常通用的设备。惠普应用了Kaby Lake处理器和一个单显。让我看看它如何运作？

Sebastian Bade, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), Published 02/17/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng

Processor

Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R7 M440 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1021 MHz, Memory: 1000 MHz, DDR3 (Samsung), AMD: Crimson 16.5; Intel: 21.20.16.4471, Intel HD Graphics 620

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 单通道

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, WLED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH

Storage

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, 256 GB

, M.2 2280, 180 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机/麦克风二合一, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller 10/100 (10MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.0

Optical drive

HP DVDRW GUD1N

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 417 x 279

Battery

41 Wh, 2550 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 可替换

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, 在底部, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 电源适配器, HP Audio Switch, HP JumpStart, HP Lounge, McAfee LiveSafe (30天试用版), CyberLink PowerDirector, Netflix, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.514 kg, Power Supply: 345 g

Price

699 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400	67.3 MB/s +254%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE	59 MB/s +211%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1	57.4 MB/s +202%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	57.3 MB/s +202%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	52.6 MB/s +177%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng	19 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA	85.3 MB/s +316%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400	81 MB/s +295%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D	80.9 MB/s +295%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE	24.9 MB/s +21%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng	20.5 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	413 MBit/s +710%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	51 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	621 MBit/s +1311%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC	44 MBit/s


273 cd/m²	298 cd/m²	265 cd/m²
281 cd/m²	288 cd/m²	285 cd/m²
283 cd/m²	290 cd/m²	302 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Chi Mei CMN1738 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 285 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 288 cd/m²
Contrast: 472:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Chi Mei CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.30	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Innolux N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.60	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-37%	-30%	26%	-32%	-34%
Display P3 Coverage	63.6	38.57 -39%	42.66 -33%	84.2 32%	41.23 -35%	40.35 -37%
sRGB Coverage	86.5	57.4 -34%	64.1 -26%	99.7 15%	61.4 -29%	60.3 -30%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.3	39.89 -37%	44.08 -30%	82.7 31%	42.67 -33%	41.71 -34%
Response Times		13%	-42%	139%	-1%	12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(16, 25)	39 ?(21, 18) 5%	51 ?(18, 33) -24%	44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU) -7%	40.8 ?(22, 18.8) -0%	41 ?(19, 22) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	30 ?(8, 22)	24 ?(19, 5) 20%	38 ?(8, 30) -27%	23 ?(7, 16, Plateau) 23%	30.4 ?(8.4, 22) -1%	23 ?(10, 13) 23%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)		50 ?(10) -75%	1000 ?(80) 400%
Screen		-41%	21%	-57%	-14%	-50%
Brightness middle	288	176 -39%	291 1%	234 -19%	244 -15%	240 -17%
Brightness	285	169 -41%	265 -7%	219 -23%	231 -19%	228 -20%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	86 -2%	80 -9%	89 1%	89 1%
Black Level *	0.61	0.47 23%	0.23 62%	0.48 21%	0.37 39%	0.49 20%
Contrast	472	374 -21%	1265 168%	488 3%	659 40%	490 4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.56	8.83 -94%	4.78 -5%	11.8 -159%	6.41 -41%	10.96 -140%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.76	14.01 -81%	9.51 -23%	20.69 -167%	13.4 -73%	18.36 -137%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.95	8.97 -81%	3.49 29%	13.3 -169%	5.94 -20%	11.34 -129%
Gamma	2.48 ^89%	2.43 ^91%	2.58 ^85%	2.47 ^89%	2.28 ^96%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	7669 ^85%	10234 ^64%	6013 ^108%	17098 ^38%	6101 ^107%	12292 ^53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	57.3 -38%	64 -31%	100 8%	61.1 -34%	60 -35%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		36.8	40	74	39.3	39
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-22% / -32%	-17% / -2%	36% / -1%	-16% / -16%	-24% / -38%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	148 Points +14%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	119 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	75 Points -42%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	338 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	295 Points -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	215 Points -35%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	1.48 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	1.35 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	0.87 Points -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	3.7 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	3.7 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3.69 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	3.24 Points -12%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2.59 Points -30%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6496 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	5829 Points -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	14471 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	13058 Points -10%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U	244.6 Points +15%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	220.8 Points +4%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	213.1 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	207.2 Points -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	201.5 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	127.6 Points -40%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	32356 Points 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	32288 Points
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	32242 Points 0%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	30546 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	18921 Points -41%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P	2098 ms * -77%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U	1216 ms * -2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U	1187 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U	1164 ms * +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U	1140 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

8207

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

11318

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5001

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

8347 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

14471 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

6496 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

3.69 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

26.42 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.48 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

331 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

130 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

34.47 fps

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 | PCMark 7

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700 MHz, Liteonit CV3-DE256	3778 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	3546 Points +14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3390 Points +9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3162 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3102 Points
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	2904 Points -6%
Storage Score v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4841 Points
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	2112 Points -56%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	1874 Points -61%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	4429 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	4389 Points -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3872 Points -13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, Toshiba MQ01ABD100	3696 Points -17%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	3569 Points -19%

PCMark 7
Productivity
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	3953 Points
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	3062 Points -23%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	1591 Points -60%
Score
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500 MHz, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	5035 Points
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD A10-9600P, 2400 MHz,	4340 Points -14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300 MHz, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	3021 Points -40%

PCMark 7 Score		5035 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3102 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4429 points
Help

... in comparison

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D Toshiba MQ01ABD100	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-92%	40%	-89%	39%	-10%
Read Seq	500	95.3 -81%	469.2 -6%	108.1 -78%	476.5 -5%	503 1%
Write Seq	325.1	85.6 -74%	431.5 33%	105.6 -68%	458.7 41%	316.6 -3%
Read 512	290.2	29.32 -90%	338.3 17%	35.32 -88%	346.4 19%	261.9 -10%
Write 512	300.3	25.93 -91%	297.9 -1%	46.13 -85%	291.1 -3%	281.2 -6%
Read 4k	11.24	0.366 -97%	28.68 155%	0.413 -96%	35.15 213%	17.04 52%
Write 4k	86	0.726 -99%	66.8 -22%	0.9 -99%	78.8 -8%	46.55 -46%
Read 4k QD32	145.4	0.647 -100%	364.7 151%	0.895 -99%	276 90%	125 -14%
Write 4k QD32	272.7	0.722 -100%	245.9 -10%	0.884 -100%	178.3 -35%	131.4 -52%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G

Sequential Read: 500 MB/s

Sequential Write: 325.1 MB/s

512K Read: 290.2 MB/s

512K Write: 300.3 MB/s

4K Read: 11.24 MB/s

4K Write: 86 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 145.4 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 272.7 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	22439 Points +277%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	21635 Points +263%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	12483 Points +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	9501 Points +60%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U	5953 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	3574 Points +200%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	3555 Points +199%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	2209 Points +86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	1752 Points +47%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U	1190 Points

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U	4251 Points +86%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U	4239 Points +86%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P	3775 Points +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U	2556 Points +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U	2436 Points +7%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U	2280 Points

3DMark 03 Standard		18884 points
3DMark 05 Standard		16534 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		8950 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		5698 points
3DMark 11 Performance		2398 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		45093 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		5168 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1083 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		547 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		433 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Battlefield 4

BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	96.8 fps +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	93.3 (18.33^min - 156.07^max) fps +122%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	53.1 fps +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	48.6 fps +16%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	42.9 fps +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440	42 fps

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	35.8 fps +201%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	31.6 fps +166%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	13.9 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440	11.9 fps

Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	81.4 fps +121%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M	78.6 fps +113%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX	46.7 fps +27%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA AMD Radeon R8 M445DX	37.2 fps +1%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng AMD Radeon R7 M440	36.9 fps

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	73.6	42	32.6	9.6
Battlefield 4 (2013)	51.2	36.9	23.3	7.6
GTA V (2015)	50.7	43.7	12.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	21.1	13.4	6.9
Anno 2205 (2015)	35.3	17.1	7
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	54	42.9	26.9	20.3
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	22	11.9	6	3.5
XCOM 2 (2016)	22.8	7.9	5.2	4.9
Far Cry Primal (2016)	20.6	9.9	8.9
The Division (2016)	23.1	15.6	6.2
Doom (2016)	22	13	8.1
Overwatch (2016)	60.5	42.6	22.3	12.4
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)	13.9	10.1	5.2
FIFA 17 (2016)	61.8	59.7	34.6	29.7
Mafia 3 (2016)	14	8.9
Battlefield 1 (2016)	31.8	22.7	9.6	9.6
Civilization VI (2016)	36.4	26.1	9.5
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	69.7	59.3	21.1
Titanfall 2 (2016)	41.1	29.8	11.2
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016)	26.4	22.6	12.1
Dishonored 2 (2016)	10.9	9.2
Watch Dogs 2 (2016)	18.7	13.6
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	40.5	15.9

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 31 / 31 dB(A)
DVD		35.8 / dB(A)
Load		33.8 / 44.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Noise		2%	-2%	-3%	5%	-5%
off / environment *	29	28.9 -0%	31.6 -9%	31.2 -8%	29 -0%	31.2 -8%
Idle Minimum *	31	30.8 1%	32.6 -5%	32.4 -5%	29 6%	31.7 -2%
Idle Average *	31	30.8 1%	32.6 -5%	33.5 -8%	29 6%	31.9 -3%
Idle Maximum *	31	30.8 1%	32.6 -5%	33.5 -8%	29 6%	31.9 -3%
Load Average *	33.8	33.4 1%	35.3 -4%	35.2 -4%	35.6 -5%	41 -21%
Load Maximum *	44.8	40.1 10%	37.1 17%	38.7 14%	38.5 14%	42.7 5%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


37.5 °C	40.2 °C	24.9 °C
40.3 °C	37.9 °C	25.2 °C
29.3 °C	31.3 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 32.4 °C


24 °C	42.5 °C	46.1 °C
24.3 °C	33 °C	42 °C
22.8 °C	27.3 °C	26.6 °C

Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 32.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.5 °C / -4.5 F).

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Heat		-29%	3%	-27%	-12%	1%
Maximum Upper Side *	40.3	48.1 -19%	38.3 5%	46.6 -16%	43.8 -9%	33.4 17%
Maximum Bottom *	46.1	60.8 -32%	36 22%	65.4 -42%	53 -15%	32.9 29%
Idle Upper Side *	23.8	30.8 -29%	24.9 -5%	28.9 -21%	25.9 -9%	27.7 -16%
Idle Bottom *	23.4	31.9 -36%	25.6 -9%	29.8 -27%	27.1 -16%	29.4 -26%

* ... smaller is better

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Idle	7.7 / 14 / 15.1 Watt
Load	33 / 54.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng i5-7200U, Radeon R7 M440	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Power Consumption		-2%	24%	-19%	26%	13%
Idle Minimum *	7.7	6 22%	3.9 49%	8.3 -8%	2.7 65%	5.5 29%
Idle Average *	14	8.1 42%	7.4 47%	12.1 14%	5.5 61%	8.2 41%
Idle Maximum *	15.1	9.8 35%	9.5 37%	15.4 -2%	6.5 57%	9.5 37%
Load Average *	33	52.5 -59%	41 -24%	56 -70%	44.2 -34%	44.5 -35%
Load Maximum *	54.6	81.6 -49%	48 12%	70 -28%	65.2 -19%	58 -6%

* ... smaller is better

The battery is replaceable and has a capacity of 41 Wh. — The battery is replaceable and ...

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		8h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)		5h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		4h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 30min

	HP Pavilion 17-x110ng 41 Wh	Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D 62 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE 30 Wh	Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 62 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 45 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA 41 Wh
Battery Runtime		30%	-21%	31%	51%	-11%
Reader / Idle	527	767 46%		667 27%	1043 98%	560 6%
H.264	287	460 60%		335 17%	503 75%	194 -32%
WiFi v1.3	346	451 30%	275 -21%	386 12%	326 -6%	260 -25%
Load	90	75 -17%		152 69%	124 38%	95 6%

Pros

+ 由于快速处理器，系统性能良好

+ 低温

+ 处理器没有热节流

+ 显示器具有宽视角

+ 哑光屏幕

+ 中等系统噪声

+ 低重量，即使有17英寸

+ 光驱可用

+ 固态硬盘

Cons

- 无键盘背光

- 不能处理所有的游戏，尽管采用独显

- 缺少维护舱口

- 无线局域网性能低

- 只有256 GB的存储空间

- 没有硬盘

- 非常慢的SD卡读卡器

In review: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

惠普17英寸多媒体笔记本Pavilion 17-x110ng目前零售价为699欧元（约合750美元）。它采用了英特尔处理器和AMD显卡的组合，配件置于并不起眼的黑色塑料机身内。英特尔酷睿i5-7200U是一款现代化的Kaby Lake芯片，高效的双核SoC为大多数多媒体应用程序提供了足够的性能。8 GB DDR4-RAM内存条也不错，即使面对苛刻的应用程序也不应该有任何问题。IPS显示屏幕提供宽广的视角，我们没有发现屏幕漏光现象。

惠普Pavilion 17-x110ng具有良好的系统性能，但由于显卡速度缓慢，游戏功能受到制约。

专用显卡是一个不错的补充，但你应该好好考虑你的使用场景。因为它的性能仅仅只能使得低分辨率下的游戏变的流畅。存储解决方案既好又坏。使用快速固态硬盘作为系统驱动器是有意义的，但是对于多媒体设备而言，256GB是不够的，毕竟其中大量数据是必要的。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng - 2017-01-24 01/24/2017 v6^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

78 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

78%

Pointing Device

77%

Connectivity

40 / 81 → 49%

Weight

60 / 20-67 → 84%

Battery

82%

Display

85%

Games Performance

58 / 85 → 69%

Application Performance

83 / 92 → 90%

Temperature

93%

Noise

87 / 95 → 92%

Audio

59%

Camera

42 / 85 → 50%

Average

71%

79%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1618 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 17-x110ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sebastian Bade, 2017-02-17 (Update: 2017-02-19)