Notebookcheck

惠普 Pavilion 17-x110ng 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sebastian Bade, Stefanie Voigt (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 02/17/2017
AMD Laptop / Notebook Kaby Lake Windows

17英寸多媒体笔记本电脑! 多媒体笔记本电脑是非常通用的设备。惠普应用了Kaby Lake处理器和一个单显。让我看看它如何运作?

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon R7 M440 - 2048 MB, Core: 1021 MHz, Memory: 1000 MHz, DDR3 (Samsung), AMD: Crimson 16.5; Intel: 21.20.16.4471, Intel HD Graphics 620
Memory
8192 MB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, 单通道
Display
17.3 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1738, IPS, WLED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, 256 GB 
, M.2 2280, 180 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机/麦克风 二合一, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Realtek PCIe FE Family Controller 10/100 (10MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HP DVDRW GUD1N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.9 x 417 x 279
Battery
41 Wh, 2550 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable, 可替换
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, 在底部, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, 电源适配器, HP Audio Switch, HP JumpStart, HP Lounge, McAfee LiveSafe (30天试用版), CyberLink PowerDirector, Netflix, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.514 kg, Power Supply: 345 g
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

417 mm 279 mm 24.9 mm 2.5 kg382 mm 259 mm 29.2 mm 2.4 kg381.6 mm 259 mm 28.45 mm 2.4 kg382 mm 242 mm 22.5 mm 2 kg379 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg339 mm 242 mm 23.7 mm 1.9 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
 
67.3 MB/s ∼100% +254%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
 
59 MB/s ∼88% +211%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
 
57.36 MB/s ∼85% +202%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
 
57.3 MB/s ∼85% +202%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
 
52.6 MB/s ∼78% +177%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
 
19 MB/s ∼28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
 
85.3 MB/s ∼100% +316%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
 
81.04 MB/s ∼95% +295%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
 
80.9 MB/s ∼95% +295%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
 
24.9 MB/s ∼29% +21%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
 
20.5 MB/s ∼24%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
621 MBit/s ∼100% +1311%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
44 MBit/s ∼7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
413 MBit/s ∼100% +710%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-E NIC
51 MBit/s ∼12%
273
cd/m²
298
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
288
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Chi Mei CMN1738
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 302 cd/m² Average: 285 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 288 cd/m²
Contrast: 472:1 (Black: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Chi Mei CMN1738, , 1920x1080, 17.3
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Innolux N156HGE-EAL, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
Chi Mei, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
13%
-42%
139%
-1%
12%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41 (16, 25)
39 (21, 18)
5%
51 (18, 33)
-24%
44 (24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU)
-7%
40.8 (22, 18.8)
-0%
41 (19, 22)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (8, 22)
24 (19, 5)
20%
38 (8, 30)
-27%
23 (7, 16, Plateau)
23%
30.4 (8.4, 22)
-1%
23 (10, 13)
23%
PWM Frequency
200 (90)
50 (10)
-75%
1000 (80)
400%
Screen
-41%
21%
-57%
-14%
-50%
Brightness middle
288
176
-39%
291
1%
234
-19%
244
-15%
240
-17%
Brightness
285
169
-41%
265
-7%
219
-23%
231
-19%
228
-20%
Brightness Distribution
88
91
3%
86
-2%
80
-9%
89
1%
89
1%
Black Level *
0.61
0.47
23%
0.23
62%
0.48
21%
0.37
39%
0.49
20%
Contrast
472
374
-21%
1265
168%
488
3%
659
40%
490
4%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.56
8.83
-94%
4.78
-5%
11.8
-159%
6.41
-41%
10.96
-140%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.76
14.01
-81%
9.51
-23%
20.69
-167%
13.4
-73%
18.36
-137%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.95
8.97
-81%
3.49
29%
13.3
-169%
5.94
-20%
11.34
-129%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.43 91%
2.58 85%
2.47 89%
2.28 96%
2.27 97%
CCT
7669 85%
10234 64%
6013 108%
17098 38%
6101 107%
12292 53%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
57.3
-38%
64
-31%
100
8%
61.1
-34%
60
-35%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
36.8
40
74
39.3
39
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-14% / -31%
-11% / 6%
41% / -8%
-8% / -11%
-19% / -39%

* ... smaller is better

Grayscale
Grayscale
ColorChecker
ColorChecker
Saturation Sweeps
Saturation Sweeps

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (39.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18300 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
148 Points ∼66% +14%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
130 Points ∼58%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼58% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points ∼58% -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
119 Points ∼53% -8%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
75 Points ∼33% -42%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
338 Points ∼8% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼8% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼8% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points ∼8%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
295 Points ∼7% -11%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
215 Points ∼5% -35%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼58% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼58% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.48 Points ∼58%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.35 Points ∼53% -9%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
0.87 Points ∼34% -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼8% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.7 Points ∼8% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.69 Points ∼8%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.24 Points ∼7% -12%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2.59 Points ∼6% -30%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
6496 Points ∼60%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
5829 Points ∼54% -10%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
14471 Points ∼17%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
13058 Points ∼15% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U
244.58 Points ∼70% +15%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
220.75 Points ∼63% +4%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
213.08 Points ∼61%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
207.21 Points ∼59% -3%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
201.52 Points ∼57% -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
127.57 Points ∼36% -40%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
32356 Points ∼62% 0%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
32288 Points ∼62%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
32242 Points ∼62% 0%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
30546 Points ∼58% -5%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
18921 Points ∼36% -41%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P
2098.3 ms * ∼4% -77%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
1216.2 ms * ∼2% -2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U
1186.7 ms * ∼2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
1163.8 ms * ∼2% +2%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U
1139.5 ms * ∼2% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8207
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11318
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5001
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
8347 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
14471 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
6496 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.69 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
26.42 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
130 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.47 fps
Help
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 7
PCMark 8
Storage Score v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4841 Points ∼94%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
2112 Points ∼41% -56%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
1874 Points ∼37% -61%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
4429 Points ∼41%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4389 Points ∼40% -1%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3872 Points ∼35% -13%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3696 Points ∼34% -17%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3569 Points ∼33% -19%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Intel Core i7-7500U, 2700, Liteonit CV3-DE256
3778 Points ∼62% +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
3546 Points ∼58% +14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3390 Points ∼56% +9%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3162 Points ∼52% +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3102 Points ∼51%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
2904 Points ∼48% -6%
PCMark 7
Productivity
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
3953 Points ∼36%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
3062 Points ∼28% -23%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
1591 Points ∼15% -60%
Score
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Intel Core i5-7200U, 2500, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
5035 Points ∼55%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD A10-9600P, 2400,
4340 Points ∼47% -14%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U, 2300, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3021 Points ∼33% -40%
PCMark 7 Score
5035 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3102 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4429 points
Help
CrystalDiskMark
CrystalDiskMark
AS SSD
AS SSD
ATTO
ATTO
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
Liteonit CV3-DE256
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
 
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-92%
40%
-89%
39%
-10%
Write 4k QD32
272.7
0.722
-100%
245.9
-10%
0.884
-100%
178.3
-35%
131.4
-52%
Read 4k QD32
145.4
0.647
-100%
364.7
151%
0.895
-99%
276
90%
125
-14%
Write 4k
86.03
0.726
-99%
66.8
-22%
0.9
-99%
78.82
-8%
46.55
-46%
Read 4k
11.24
0.366
-97%
28.68
155%
0.413
-96%
35.15
213%
17.04
52%
Write 512
300.3
25.93
-91%
297.9
-1%
46.13
-85%
291.1
-3%
281.2
-6%
Read 512
290.2
29.32
-90%
338.3
17%
35.32
-88%
346.4
19%
261.9
-10%
Write Seq
325.1
85.61
-74%
431.5
33%
105.6
-68%
458.7
41%
316.6
-3%
Read Seq
500.1
95.33
-81%
469.2
-6%
108.1
-78%
476.5
-5%
502.8
1%
SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G
Sequential Read: 500.1 MB/s
Sequential Write: 325.1 MB/s
512K Read: 290.2 MB/s
512K Write: 300.3 MB/s
4K Read: 11.24 MB/s
4K Write: 86.03 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 145.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 272.7 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver Stresstest
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark 11
3DMark Vantage
3DMark 06
3DMark 05
3DMark 03
 
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
3574 Points ∼9% +200%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
3555 Points ∼9% +199%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
2209 Points ∼5% +86%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
1752 Points ∼4% +47%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
1190 Points ∼3%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
22439 Points ∼11% +277%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
21635 Points ∼11% +263%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
12483 Points ∼6% +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
9501 Points ∼5% +60%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
5953 Points ∼3%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-7200U
4251 Points ∼8% +86%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4239 Points ∼8% +86%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX, AMD A10-9600P
3775 Points ∼7% +66%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2556 Points ∼5% +12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2436 Points ∼5% +7%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440, Intel Core i5-7200U
2280 Points ∼4%
3DMark 03 Standard
18884 points
3DMark 05 Standard
16534 points
3DMark 06 Standard
8950 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
5698 points
3DMark 11 Performance
2398 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
45093 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5168 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1083 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
547 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
433 points
Help
BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
96.8 fps ∼100% +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
93.3 (min: 18.33, max: 156.07) fps ∼96% +122%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
53.1 fps ∼55% +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
48.6 fps ∼50% +16%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
42.9 fps ∼44% +2%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
42 fps ∼43%
Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
35.8 fps ∼100% +201%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
31.6 fps ∼88% +166%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
13.9 fps ∼39% +17%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
11.9 fps ∼33%
Battlefield 4 - 1366x768 Medium Preset
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
81.4 fps ∼100% +121%
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
78.6 fps ∼97% +113%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
46.7 fps ∼57% +27%
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
37.2 fps ∼46% +1%
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
AMD Radeon R7 M440
36.9 fps ∼45%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 73.6 42 32.6 9.6 fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 51.2 36.9 23.3 7.6 fps
GTA V (2015) 50.7 43.7 12.2 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 21.1 13.4 6.9 fps
Anno 2205 (2015) 35.3 17.1 7 fps
Rainbow Six Siege (2015) 54 42.9 26.9 20.3 fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 22 11.9 6 3.5 fps
XCOM 2 (2016) 22.8 7.9 5.2 4.9 fps
Far Cry Primal (2016) 20.6 9.9 8.9 fps
The Division (2016) 23.1 15.6 6.2 fps
Doom (2016) 22 13 8.1 fps
Overwatch (2016) 60.5 42.6 22.3 12.4 fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 13.9 10.1 5.2 fps
FIFA 17 (2016) 61.8 59.7 34.6 29.7 fps
Mafia 3 (2016) 14 8.9 fps
Battlefield 1 (2016) 31.8 22.7 9.6 9.6 fps
Civilization VI (2016) 36.4 26.1 9.5 fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 69.7 59.3 21.1 fps
Titanfall 2 (2016) 41.1 29.8 11.2 fps
Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) 26.4 22.6 12.1 fps
Dishonored 2 (2016) 10.9 9.2 fps
Watch Dogs 2 (2016) 18.7 13.6 fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 40.5 15.9 fps

Noise Level

Idle
31 / 31 / 31 dB(A)
DVD
35.8 / dB(A)
Load
33.8 / 44.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Noise
2%
-2%
-3%
5%
-5%
off / environment *
29
28.9
-0%
31.6
-9%
31.2
-8%
29
-0%
31.2
-8%
Idle Minimum *
31
30.8
1%
32.6
-5%
32.4
-5%
29
6%
31.7
-2%
Idle Average *
31
30.8
1%
32.6
-5%
33.5
-8%
29
6%
31.9
-3%
Idle Maximum *
31
30.8
1%
32.6
-5%
33.5
-8%
29
6%
31.9
-3%
Load Average *
33.8
33.4
1%
35.3
-4%
35.2
-4%
35.6
-5%
41
-21%
Load Maximum *
44.8
40.1
10%
37.1
17%
38.7
14%
38.5
14%
42.7
5%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.937.135.740.137.92538.736.638.635.538.73132.632.332.631.132.64029.432.33029.829.45029.530.330.129.529.56330.330.132.133.330.38028.228.626.927.828.210027.328.628.32727.312525.726.125.625.325.71602727.126.924.32720024.325.324.524.624.32502424.92422.42431523.224.823.321.823.240022.725.322.620.322.750022.526.221.72022.563022.628.421.218.922.680023.731.320.318.123.7100024.733.819.617.724.7125023.633.718.516.823.6160024.137.818.316.324.1200023.538.518.116.123.5250020.834.417.815.620.8315018.930.217.515.518.9400018.227.117.315.418.2500017.923.717.11517.9630017.821.417.215.317.8800017.619.717.215.217.61000017.318.11714.917.31250017.117.716.914.917.11600017.217.7171517.2SPL33.844.93129.133.8N24.11.61.22median 22.7median 26.2median 18.5median 16.8median 22.7Delta2.73.32.83.52.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Pavilion 17-x110ng
Stress test Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test Prime95 + FurMark
Stress test FurMark
Stress test FurMark
Stress test Prime95
Stress test Prime95
Max. Load
 37.5 °C40.2 °C24.9 °C 
 40.3 °C37.9 °C25.2 °C 
 29.3 °C31.3 °C24.6 °C 
Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 32.4 °C
24 °C42.5 °C46.1 °C
24.3 °C33 °C42 °C
22.8 °C27.3 °C26.6 °C
Maximum: 46.1 °C
Average: 32.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.1 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 30.9 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 38.8 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.9 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Heat
-29%
3%
-27%
-12%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.3
48.1
-19%
38.3
5%
46.6
-16%
43.8
-9%
33.4
17%
Maximum Bottom *
46.1
60.8
-32%
36
22%
65.4
-42%
53
-15%
32.9
29%
Idle Upper Side *
23.8
30.8
-29%
24.9
-5%
28.9
-21%
25.9
-9%
27.7
-16%
Idle Bottom *
23.4
31.9
-36%
25.6
-9%
29.8
-27%
27.1
-16%
29.4
-26%

* ... smaller is better

dts Studio Sound
dts Studio Sound
With equalizer
With equalizer
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.340.140.3253735.5373135.631.135.64037.429.837.45039.429.539.4634033.340804127.84110040.42740.41254225.34216044.324.344.320048.524.648.525052.722.452.731557.621.857.640057.420.357.450061.62061.663067.618.967.680064.118.164.1100060.317.760.3125059.116.859.1160059.416.359.4200060.816.160.8250064.315.664.3315069.415.569.4400069.215.469.2500066.71566.7630062.915.362.9800060.815.260.81000063.714.963.71250067.514.967.51600069.41569.4SPL77.229.177.2N39.51.239.5median 60.8median 16.8median 60.8Delta4.33.54.335.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Pavilion 17-x110ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.7 / 14 / 15.1 Watt
Load midlight 33 / 54.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
7200U, Radeon R7 M440
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
7200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
7500U, GeForce 940MX
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
7200U, GeForce 940MX
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
A10-9600P, Radeon R8 M445DX
Power Consumption
-2%
24%
-19%
26%
13%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
6
22%
3.9
49%
8.3
-8%
2.7
65%
5.5
29%
Idle Average *
14
8.1
42%
7.4
47%
12.1
14%
5.5
61%
8.2
41%
Idle Maximum *
15.1
9.8
35%
9.5
37%
15.4
-2%
6.5
57%
9.5
37%
Load Average *
33
52.5
-59%
41
-24%
56
-70%
44.2
-34%
44.5
-35%
Load Maximum *
54.6
81.6
-49%
48
12%
70
-28%
65.2
-19%
58
-6%

* ... smaller is better

The battery is replaceable and has a capacity of 41 Wh.
The battery is replaceable and ...
The battery is replaceable and has a capacity of 41 Wh.
... has a capacity of 41 Wh.
Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
WLAN runtime
WLAN runtime
H.264 runtime
H.264 runtime
Charging
Charging
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 47min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (EDGE: 38.14393.0.0)
5h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 30min
HP Pavilion 17-x110ng
41 Wh
Acer Aspire E5-575G-549D
62 Wh
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE
30 Wh
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
62 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
45 Wh
HP Pavilion 15-aw004ng W8Y60EA
41 Wh
Battery Runtime
30%
-21%
31%
51%
-11%
Reader / Idle
527
767
46%
667
27%
1043
98%
560
6%
H.264
287
460
60%
335
17%
503
75%
194
-32%
WiFi v1.3
346
451
30%
275
-21%
386
12%
326
-6%
260
-25%
Load
90
75
-17%
152
69%
124
38%
95
6%

Pros

+ 由于快速处理器,系统性能良好
+ 低温
+ 处理器没有热节流
+ 显示器具有宽视角
+ 哑光屏幕
+ 中等系统噪声
+ 低重量,即使有17英寸
+ 光驱可用
+ 固态硬盘

Cons

- 无键盘背光
- 不能处理所有的游戏,尽管采用独显
- 缺少维护舱口
- 无线局域网性能低
- 只有256 GB的存储空间
- 没有硬盘
- 非常慢的SD卡读卡器
In review: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.
In review: HP Pavilion 17-x110ng. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.

惠普17英寸多媒体笔记本Pavilion 17-x110ng目前零售价为699欧元(约合750美元)。它采用了英特尔处理器和AMD显卡的组合,配件置于并不起眼的黑色塑料机身内。英特尔酷睿i5-7200U是一款现代化的Kaby Lake芯片,高效的双核SoC为大多数多媒体应用程序提供了足够的性能。8 GB DDR4-RAM内存条也不错,即使面对苛刻的应用程序也不应该有任何问题。IPS显示屏幕提供宽广的视角,我们没有发现屏幕漏光现象。

惠普Pavilion 17-x110ng具有良好的系统性能,但由于显卡速度缓慢,游戏功能受到制约。

专用显卡是一个不错的补充,但你应该好好考虑你的使用场景。因为它的性能仅仅只能使得低分辨率下的游戏变的流畅。存储解决方案既好又坏。使用快速固态硬盘作为系统驱动器是有意义的,但是对于多媒体设备而言,256GB是不够的,毕竟其中大量数据是必要的。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

 

 

HP Pavilion 17-x110ng - 01/24/2017 v6(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
78 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
78%
Pointing Device
77%
Connectivity
40 / 81 → 49%
Weight
60 / 20-67 → 84%
Battery
82%
Display
85%
Games Performance
58 / 85 → 69%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 90%
Temperature
93%
Noise
87 / 95 → 92%
Audio
59%
Camera
42 / 85 → 50%
Average
71%
79%
Multimedia - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Pavilion 17-x110ng 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2017-02-17 (Update: 2017-02-19)
Andreas Osthoff
Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Notebooks