Notebookcheck

技嘉 P55W v6 笔记本电脑简短评测

Oliver Moebel (translated by Yuchen Wang), 02/11/2017
Gaming Geforce Notebook Skylake Windows

专注基础。 技嘉的最新版P55W变化并不大。前代机型搭配GeForce GTX 970M现在变成了GTX 1060——而这带来了不小的区别。

Gigabyte P55W v6 (P55 Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1405 MHz, Memory: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 368.71, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2133, 双通道, 2个插槽已占用, 最高支持 32 GB
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), IPS, 全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Storage
Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800), 128 GB 
, 固态硬盘 + HGST TravelStar 7K1000 (HTS721010A9E630), 1 TB HDD @7200 rpm. 插槽: 1x m.2 2280 (SATA/PCIe) & 1x 2.5寸
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Skylake PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 耳机接口,麦克风接口, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUD0N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 34 x 380 x 269
Battery
63 Wh, 5400 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 6 芯
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 高清 ([email protected])
Primary Camera: 0 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0 , Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: yes, 180瓦电源适配器,说明书,质保卡,驱动盘, PowerDVD 12, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.66 kg, Power Supply: 640 g
Price
1600 EUR

 

Connectivity hasn't changed: the left side features Kensington Lock, VGA, RJ45 GBit-LAN, HDMI, USB 3.1 and USB 3.0 ,...
Connectivity hasn't changed: the left side features Kensington Lock, VGA, RJ45 GBit-LAN, HDMI, USB 3.1 and USB 3.0 ,...
... and the right side two 3.5 mm jacks for the microphone and the headphones, 2x USB 3.0, optical drive and the power jack.
... and the right side two 3.5 mm jacks for the microphone and the headphones, 2x USB 3.0, optical drive and the power jack.
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79 MB/s ∼100% +8%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
75 MB/s ∼95% +3%
Gigabyte P55W v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
73 MB/s ∼92%
Gigabyte P55W v5
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
47 MB/s ∼59% -36%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26 MB/s ∼33% -64%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
89 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
87 MB/s ∼98%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼96% -2%
Gigabyte P55W v5
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
76 MB/s ∼85% -13%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
677 MBit/s ∼100% +3%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s ∼99% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
660 MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
608 MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
507 MBit/s ∼83% +3%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
492 MBit/s ∼81%
282
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 332 cd/m² Average: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 280 cd/m²
Contrast: 609:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.48 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 2.69 | - Ø
80% sRGB (Argyll) 53% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.37
Gigabyte P55W v6
LG Philips LP156WF4 (LGD040E), 1920x1080
Gigabyte P55W v5
LG Philips LP156WF4-SPH1, 1920x1080
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), 1920x1080
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Samsung 156HL01-104 (SDC324C) , 1920x1080
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPP1 (LGD04D5), 1920x1080
Response Times
17%
24%
16%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56
44
21%
40
29%
35
37%
Response Time Black / White *
31
27
13%
25
19%
26
16%
25
19%
PWM Frequency
202
Screen
9%
10%
11%
17%
Brightness
294
267
-9%
296
1%
279
-5%
267
-9%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
88
7%
84
2%
83
1%
Black Level *
0.46
0.28
39%
0.33
28%
0.33
28%
0.27
41%
Contrast
609
907
49%
973
60%
888
46%
1011
66%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.48
4.28
4%
4.42
1%
3.59
20%
3.77
16%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.69
2.77
-3%
3.34
-24%
3.86
-43%
2.48
8%
Gamma
2.37 101%
2.28 105%
2.4 100%
2.53 95%
2.37 101%
CCT
6455 101%
6284 103%
6213 105%
7229 90%
6854 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
53
47
-11%
55
4%
63
19%
55
4%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
80
73
-9%
83
4%
97
21%
84
5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
13% / 10%
17% / 13%
14% / 12%
23% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

P55W v6 vs. sRGB (80 %)
P55W v6 vs. sRGB (80 %)
P55W v6 vs. AdobeRGB (53 %)
P55W v6 vs. AdobeRGB (53 %)
CalMAN - Graylevels
CalMAN - Graylevels
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Graylevels (calibrated)
CalMAN - Graylevels (calibrated)
CalMAN - Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN - Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (27.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 33 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (44.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 60 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 875 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 30860) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
HWInfo
HWInfo
Latencymon
Latencymon
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
152 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
148 Points ∼97% +3%
Gigabyte P55W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
144 Points ∼95% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼94%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
143 Points ∼94% 0%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
139 Points ∼91% -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
680 Points ∼100% +1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
677 Points ∼100% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v5
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
675 Points ∼99% 0%
Gigabyte P55W v6
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points ∼99%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
667 Points ∼98% -1%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
661 Points ∼97% -2%
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
5093
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
20092
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6851
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.57 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
7.37 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
63.1 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
143 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
673 Points
Help
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
5109 Points ∼100% +7%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, LiteOn CV1-8B512
5088 Points ∼100% +6%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4859 Points ∼95% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
4852 Points ∼95% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4784 Points ∼94%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
4741 Points ∼100% +18%
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ, LiteOn CV1-8B512
4692 Points ∼99% +17%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
4060 Points ∼86% +1%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
4014 Points ∼85%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
3832 Points ∼81% -5%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
3698 Points ∼78% -8%
PCMark 7 Score
5715 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4014 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4897 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4784 points
Help
Gigabyte P55W v6
Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
Gigabyte P55W v5
Samung SM951 MZVPV128 NVMe
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN)
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39MND)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
LiteOn CV1-8B512
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
166%
53%
298%
50%
55%
Write 4k QD32
160.3
236.3
47%
301.5
88%
384.4
140%
317.4
98%
273.8
71%
Read 4k QD32
264.7
587.6
122%
246.7
-7%
464.4
75%
394.9
49%
290.9
10%
Write 4k
76.7
142.7
86%
86.25
12%
153.2
100%
38.36
-50%
72.93
-5%
Read 4k
26.2
50.75
94%
25.61
-2%
52.34
100%
16.97
-35%
27.69
6%
Write 512
160.8
642
299%
407.1
153%
1288
701%
418.2
160%
433.7
170%
Read 512
338
1044
209%
335
-1%
1279
278%
348.1
3%
355.3
5%
Write Seq
161.1
657.4
308%
462.7
187%
1292
702%
449.6
179%
449.7
179%
Read Seq
511
1356
165%
462.5
-9%
1973
286%
494.2
-3%
516.5
1%
Transcend MTS800 128GB M.2 (TS128GMTS800)
Sequential Read: 511 MB/s
Sequential Write: 161.1 MB/s
512K Read: 338 MB/s
512K Write: 160.8 MB/s
4K Read: 26.2 MB/s
4K Write: 76.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 264.7 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 160.3 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
17175 Points ∼100% +50%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11730 Points ∼68% +3%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11622 Points ∼68% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11422 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7741 Points ∼45% -32%
Gigabyte P55W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
7450 Points ∼43% -35%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
101041 Points ∼100% +45%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
78820 Points ∼78% +13%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
69528 Points ∼69%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
69253 Points ∼69% 0%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
48626 Points ∼48% -30%
Gigabyte P55W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
48597 Points ∼48% -30%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
22246 Points ∼100% +50%
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15387 Points ∼69% +4%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
15075 Points ∼68% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14792 Points ∼66%
Gigabyte P55W v5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
9910 Points ∼45% -33%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9713 Points ∼44% -34%
3DMark 11 Performance
12433 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22706 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
9527 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
4963 points
Help
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
60 fps ∼100% +59%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
40.4 fps ∼67% +7%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
37.8 fps ∼63%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
25.5 fps ∼43% -33%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
110.8 fps ∼100% +75%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
74.6 fps ∼67% +18%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
63.3 fps ∼57%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-D0DD
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
37.3 fps ∼34% -41%
Deus Ex Mankind Divided
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
43.2 fps ∼100% +54%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
28 fps ∼65%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
26.9 fps ∼62% -4%
1920x1080 High Preset AF:4x
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
81.3 fps ∼100% +49%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
54.6 fps ∼67%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
49.1 fps ∼60% -10%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
102.3 fps ∼100% +3%
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
101.8 fps ∼100% +2%
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
99.7 fps ∼97%
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
69.7 fps ∼68% -30%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 189176.2151.799.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 166.1127.263.337.8fps
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 116.198.454.628fps

Noise Level

Idle
35 / 36 / 37 dB(A)
HDD
37 dB(A)
DVD
39 / dB(A)
Load
41 / 52 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 31 dB(A)
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Noise
4%
3%
9%
2%
Idle Minimum *
35
33
6%
32
9%
32
9%
31
11%
Idle Average *
36
34
6%
33
8%
33
8%
35
3%
Idle Maximum *
37
35
5%
34
8%
34
8%
38
-3%
Load Average *
41
43
-5%
44
-7%
37
10%
43
-5%
Load Maximum *
52
49
6%
53
-2%
46
12%
49
6%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 46.5 °C44.7 °C31.5 °C 
 47.7 °C46.7 °C32 °C 
 45.2 °C44.7 °C29.4 °C 
Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
28 °C43.1 °C51.2 °C
30.9 °C46 °C48.6 °C
29.2 °C46.3 °C49.1 °C
Maximum: 51.2 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
Maximum load top (Optris PI 640)
Maximum load top (Optris PI 640)
Maximum load bottom (Optris PI 640)
Maximum load bottom (Optris PI 640)
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Heat
5%
-17%
5%
18%
Maximum Upper Side *
47.7
50
-5%
65.3
-37%
45.3
5%
40.5
15%
Maximum Bottom *
51.2
57.7
-13%
64.4
-26%
62.6
-22%
42
18%
Idle Upper Side *
32.1
25.7
20%
35.4
-10%
25.3
21%
28.2
12%
Idle Bottom *
32.8
27.2
17%
31.6
4%
27.3
17%
24.3
26%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.532.3253535.73132.8344026.730.25027.730.76327.228.1802628.910023.829.412523.233.716022.834.520020.640.62502144.231521.552.440020.556.750019.758.563019.157.580018.664.1100018.874.1125018.776.3160018.971.820001970.5250019.270.9315019.370.6400019.369.3500019.373.9630019.268.6800019.371.81000019.262.31250019.165.11600018.960.7SPL31.383.2N1.553.5median 19.3Gigabyte P55W v6median 64.1Delta0.910.638.135.744.241.14038.832.337.229.334.231.429.93134.524.335.423.525.626.634.822.343.522.851.721.260.720.36119.260.618.764.818.464.618.667.519.465.818.662.718.863.518.864.718.764.618.863.418.966.918.965.918.953.71949.718.849.318.745.431.276.31.538.8median 18.9Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039Tmedian 611.38.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Gigabyte P55W v6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 17%, worst was 29%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 48%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 13 / 17 Watt
Load midlight 71 / 165 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Voltcraft VC 940
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ
Power Consumption
-4%
-34%
-56%
-65%
Idle Minimum *
8
9
-13%
16
-100%
18
-125%
18
-125%
Idle Average *
13
13
-0%
19
-46%
22
-69%
24
-85%
Idle Maximum *
17
17
-0%
23
-35%
30
-76%
29
-71%
Load Average *
71
81
-14%
68
4%
77
-8%
86
-21%
Load Maximum *
165
152
8%
157
5%
165
-0%
201
-22%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
10h 10min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
5h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 35min
Gigabyte P55W v6
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 63 Wh
Gigabyte P55W v5
GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, 61 Wh
Asus Strix GL502VM-FY039T
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 64 Wh
MSI GS63VR-6RF16H22 Stealth Pro
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 6700HQ, 65 Wh
Acer Predator 15 G9-593-765Q
GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 6700HQ,  Wh
Battery Runtime
-2%
-31%
-30%
-4%
Reader / Idle
610
604
-1%
315
-48%
358
-41%
Load
95
93
-2%
87
-8%
76
-20%
114
20%
WiFi
WiFi v1.3
352
348
-1%
220
-37%
210
-40%
285
-19%
H.264
338
332
-2%
235
-30%
271
-20%
298
-12%

Pro

+ 游戏性价比高
+ 优秀的输入设备
+ 长电池续航

Cons

- 屏幕缺少对比度
- 固态硬盘速度较慢
- 负载下十分吵
In review: Gigabyte P55W v6. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany
In review: Gigabyte P55W v6. Test model courtesy of Gigabyte Germany

技嘉P55W的不同机型几乎都在性能和价位上实现了巧妙的平衡——这次的第六版也是如此。从GeForce GTX 970到GTX 1060的升级带来了接近50%的3D性能提升,而它的价位并没有改变(1600欧元,约11711人民币)。”低价高效“可以说是对它的完美形容。

它的外观也完全没有改变——它的机身和合理的物理接口搭配,非常优秀的输入设备和中规中矩的扬声器都一如既往。这一次技嘉采用了一块Skylake处理器搭配16GB内存,因此它的系统性能足够应对大型软件。它的电池续航也没有受到什么影响。

相比前代机型,这台新设备在一部分方面有所退步。它的屏幕对比度相比更低,亮度分布也不如前代机型均匀。这让我们十分惊讶,因为它的屏幕型号和类型都完全相同。P55W v5所搭配的极速三星固态硬盘也换成了速度慢了许多的创见固态硬盘。它的噪音控制也相比差了不少,特别是在最高负载下时高时低的噪音十分烦人。

综合考虑,P55W v6是基于前代机型的成功更新,它的整体表现不错——而在1600欧元(约11711人民币)的价位上用户可以得到非常不错的3D性能。配置相同的华硕Strix GL502VM是唯一在性价比上可以与它抗衡的机型。不需要这么高游戏性能的用户可以节省不少,值得参考的机型包括售价约1000欧元(约7319人民币)的宏碁Aspire VX5-591G。需要比P55W v6更高性能的游戏玩家则需要准备出更多的预算:如宏碁Predator 15 G9-593售价达到了接近2500欧元(约18298人民币)。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Gigabyte P55W v6 - 01/31/2017 v6
Oliver Moebel

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
75%
Connectivity
50 / 81 → 62%
Weight
59 / 66 → 88%
Battery
85%
Display
85%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 88%
Noise
64 / 90 → 71%
Audio
70%
Average
76%
82%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 技嘉 P55W v6 笔记本电脑简短评测
Oliver Moebel, 2017-02-11 (Update: 2017-02-11)