Notebookcheck Logo

Onyx Boox Tab X 评测--适合大型任务的电子墨水平板电脑?

以 XXL 格式阅读。 13.3 英寸的 Onyx Boox Tab X 是市场上最大的电子墨水平板电脑之一。得益于Android 操作系统,它提供了应用程序支持,因此可以使用多种应用程序。点击这里查看我们的综合测试结果。
E-Ink Android ARM Tablet
Onyx Boox Tab X - 图片:Florian Schmitt
Onyx Boox TabX
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
Display
13.30 inch 4:3, 2200 x 1650 pixel 195 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, native pen support, E-Ink Mobius, 16 greyscales, glossy: no
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: position sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 310 x 228
Battery
6300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers on the back, digitizer, USB-C cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
570 g
Price
950 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
78.5 %
02/2024
Onyx Boox TabX
SD 662, Adreno 610
570 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash13.30"2200x1650
82.2 %
12/2023
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
SD 855, Adreno 640
450 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash10.30"1240x930
75.2 %
08/2023
Lenovo Smart Paper
RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2
408 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.30"1872x1404
79.4 %
08/2022
Huawei MatePad Paper
Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6
360 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.30"1872x1404

机箱和设备 - 金属机箱看起来很脆弱

如果你正在寻找一款带笔输入功能的超大电子墨水平板电脑,那么你应该看看 Onyx Boox Tab X:它拥有 13.3 英寸的屏幕,是市场上最大的电子阅读器之一。950 欧元的售价并不便宜,但几乎没有其他平板电脑能提供如此大的阅读和记笔记空间。

外壳由铝镁合金材料制成,重 570 克。考虑到平板电脑的尺寸,这样的重量其实并无大碍,但与更轻便的电子阅读器相比,它仍然明显较重。屏幕四周的边缘仅有一厘米多宽,只有底部有 2.5 厘米宽,这样你就可以舒适地握住 Tab X,而不会经常不小心操作触摸屏。

当然,对于如此巨大的平板电脑来说,稳定性始终是个问题:Onyx Boox Tab X 扭动后会出现明显的嘎吱声;我们的测试甚至在侧面发现了一条细小的裂缝。因此,在使用这款平板电脑时应小心谨慎。机身没有通过 IP 认证,因此也不要将其浸入浴缸或在灰尘较多的环境中使用。

128 GB 的大容量存储空间和 6 GB 的内存,内存配置已经足够。不过,在这个价位上,该机安装的 UFS 2.1 闪存可能会更快。

可通过 USB-C 端口和蓝牙连接外部设备。不过,没有用于内存扩展的 microSD 端口。

黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X
黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X
黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X
黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X
黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X
黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X
黑玛瑙 Boox Tab X

尺寸比较

310 mm 228 mm 7.9 mm 570 g225.2 mm 182.7 mm 6.65 mm 360 g225 mm 184.5 mm 6.6 mm 450 g226 mm 195 mm 5.5 mm 408 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

通信、软件和操作 -Android 应用程序更具灵活性

WiFi 5 是 Tab X 可以使用的最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。因此,它能实现合理的速度和相当稳定的传输。不过,千兆网络连接并不能真正使用。这是一个遗憾,尤其是考虑到其高昂的价格。华为 华为 MatePad PaperOnyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro显示了如何做得更好。

由于没有 SIM 卡插槽,你必须使用手机上网。即使没有卫星支持,这款平板电脑也能通过谷歌的 Wi-Fi 数据库确定大致位置,但在移动和 Wi-Fi 网络较少的地区,这种方法就不准确了。

使用的操作系统是Android 11,与其他电子阅读器相比,该系统的界面修改较少:你可以在主屏幕上找到小部件和图标,并在新页面上放置其他应用程序。所有内容都可以移动或组合成组。安全补丁的日期为 2023 年 6 月,因此在测试时已超过 6 个月。制造商没有说明新更新的频率。

触摸屏工作可靠,但电子墨水显示屏的帧速率较低,这意味着你必须习惯系统响应的轻微延迟。手写笔可以用来记笔记和绘图,不过屏幕上只有 16 种灰色。当然,你也可以使用 Google Play 商店中的创意应用程序。

让我们印象深刻的是这款大型电子墨水平板电脑几乎没有任何实体按键。 只有顶部边缘的待机按钮,但没有滚动按钮或音量控制。因此,你必须通过触摸屏来控制这些东西。

可以设置密码以确保数据安全。不过,该设备不能通过生物识别解锁,例如使用指纹。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
945 (826min - 958max) MBit/s +164%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
470.3 (462min - 483max) MBit/s +31%
Onyx Boox TabX
358 (346min - 373max) MBit/s
Lenovo Smart Paper
286 (236min - 308max) MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
928 (812min - 949max) MBit/s +196%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
505 (437min - 545max) MBit/s +61%
Onyx Boox TabX
313 (283min - 338max) MBit/s
Lenovo Smart Paper
211 (186min - 246max) MBit/s -33%

Legend

 
Onyx Boox TabX Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Qualcomm Adreno 640, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Onyx Boox TabX; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø313 (283-338)
Onyx Boox TabX; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (346-373)

电子阅读--多种可能性

预装的 Neo Reader 功能非常全面,还可与其他应用软件一起以分屏模式使用,例如记笔记。您可以在设定时间后激活自动翻页功能,或使用文本转语音功能朗读文本。当然,就语音质量而言,这只是一种临时的解决方案,而不是真正的有声读物,但至少它是可行的。

Android 系统的一大优势是,您还可以下载其他阅读器应用程序,如 Tolino 或亚马逊 Kindle,并顺利使用它们。

显示屏 - 黑白显示屏,对比度高

特写展示
特写展示

E-Ink 显示屏来自 Mobius 系列,分辨率为 2,200 x 1,650 像素。这种屏幕的工作原理与 IPS、OLED 或 MiniLED 显示屏完全不同:在这种屏幕上,具有不同电荷的微小墨水颗粒实际上是物理存在和定位的。因此,在没有额外照明的情况下,这种屏幕在环境光下也具有很好的对比度和可读性。

在这种情况下,它是一块黑白面板,有 16 种灰度,这通常会使显示图像时显得有些粗糙,但对于绘图和文字来说却是理想之选。屏幕采用亚光涂层,因此平板电脑也可在户外使用。

由于墨水微粒不是半透明的,如果需要,可以从正面照亮显示屏。最大亮度为 55 至 88 cd/m²,视区域而定。由于只有在环境亮度较低时才需要屏幕照明,因此这一亮度完全足够。

没有 PWM 闪烁,因为一旦显示图像,只要内容不改变,就不需要用这种技术刷新。我们的示波器证实,由于使用了直流电压源,屏幕照明也不会闪烁。

75
cd/m²
59
cd/m²
57
cd/m²
80
cd/m²
65
cd/m²
55
cd/m²
88
cd/m²
65
cd/m²
59
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 88 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 67 cd/m² Minimum: 0.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 63 %
Center on Battery: 65 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Greyscale 15.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 1.157
Onyx Boox TabX
E-Ink Mobius, 2200x1650, 13.30
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
E-Ink, 1240x930, 10.30
Lenovo Smart Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Huawei MatePad Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Response Times
13%
39%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
144.7 ?(67, 77.7)
105.5 ?(50.8, 54.7)
27%
134.4 ?(56.2, 68.2)
7%
121 ?(61, 60)
16%
Response Time Black / White *
95.9 ?(47.1, 48.8)
98.1 ?(45.6, 52.5)
-2%
27.5 ?(14.4, 13.1)
71%
94 ?(47, 47)
2%
PWM Frequency
Screen
2%
50%
13%
Brightness middle
65
44
-32%
113
74%
61.9
-5%
Brightness
67
43
-36%
106
58%
60
-10%
Brightness Distribution
63
91
44%
83
32%
80
27%
Black Level *
Greyscale dE 2000 *
15.2
10.5
31%
9.9
35%
9.1
40%
Gamma
1.157 190%
1.202 183%
1.371 160%
2.02 109%
CCT
8312 78%
6629 98%
7116 91%
6848 95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
19.76
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
37.12
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 5%
45% / 46%
11% / 12%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
95.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 47.1 ms rise
↘ 48.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
144.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 67 ms rise
↘ 77.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17908 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 性能一般

采用 高通骁龙 662onyx Boox 为其 Tab X 选择了中端 SoC,尽管该设备价格不菲,而且也是 5 年前发布的。与不支持应用程序的传统电子阅读器相比,这款平板电脑仍然具有不错的性能。不过,内部竞争产品,如 Tab Ultra C Pro在基准测试中有时能达到两倍甚至三倍的成绩。

Tab X 的性能足以满足日常使用;如果你主要阅读书籍和做笔记,你将获得相当流畅的体验。不过,使用的 UFS 2.1 闪存也相对较慢。上网时,有时网站加载需要等待较长时间,尤其是图片的滚动需要很长时间。

由于平板电脑的表面积较大,SoC 在散热方面没有问题。因此,即使长时间加载,外壳也几乎不会发热:我们测得的最高温度为 29.2 °C。即使长时间负载也几乎不会降低性能:在 3DMark 烧毁测试中,SoC 在最后阶段的表现与开始阶段相差无几。

扬声器位于设备背面。由于有两个扬声器,因此可以产生立体声效果,但由于位置较近,效果并不明显。扬声器的音量不是很大,声音的高音部分很重。声音重现清晰,但听起来不那么真实,也不是很温暖。

可以通过蓝牙或 USB-C 端口连接外置扬声器或耳机,连接没有任何问题,而且音质更好。

电池容量为 6300 毫安时。这使得它比其他大多数电子阅读器更强劲,也为 Tab X 带来了非常好的续航时间:在最低屏幕亮度和阅读模式下,平板电脑的续航时间为 24:46 小时。

该平板电脑的充电功率可达 10 瓦,由于电池容量大,充电时间可长达 5 小时。此外,您还必须购买充电器,因为包装中不包括充电器。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
744 Points +141%
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +115%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
566 Points +83%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
309 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (275 - 316, n=13)
308 Points 0%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
143 Points -54%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +82%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2268 Points +75%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1853 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (763 - 1453, n=13)
1299 Points 0%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1295 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
312 Points -76%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1008 Points +203%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 2107, n=44, last 2 years)
812 Points +144%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
333 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (330 - 333, n=2)
332 Points 0%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
203 Points -39%
Multi-Core
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2757 Points +148%
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 5652, n=44, last 2 years)
2287 Points +106%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1111 - 1147, n=2)
1129 Points +2%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1111 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
493 Points -56%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points +64%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8421 Points +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (3195 - 7554, n=6)
5608 Points +5%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
5327 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4045 Points -24%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4851 Points +339%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2571 Points +132%
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years)
2019 Points +83%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1106 - 1905, n=12)
1220 Points +10%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1106 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
567 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5429 Points +457%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2675 Points +175%
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years)
2126 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (974 - 1074, n=12)
1017 Points +4%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
974 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
517 Points -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3534 Points +68%
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years)
2790 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2108 - 2513, n=12)
2368 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2262 Points +7%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2108 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
858 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5803 Points +393%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4281 Points +264%
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years)
3212 Points +173%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1176 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (740 - 1197, n=12)
1135 Points -3%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
596 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6636 Points +541%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4472 Points +332%
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years)
3812 Points +268%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1036 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (642 - 1081, n=12)
999 Points -4%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
530 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4031 Points +81%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
3725 Points +67%
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years)
3237 Points +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1588 - 2534, n=12)
2240 Points +1%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2228 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1061 Points -52%
Wild Life Score
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2951 Points +689%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1925 Points +415%
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1631 Points +336%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 391, n=11)
378 Points +1%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
374 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
286 Points -24%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3079 Points +734%
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years)
2922 Points +692%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1886 Points +411%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 382, n=8)
370 Points 0%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
369 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
289 Points -22%
Wild Life Extreme
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
867 Points +703%
Average of class Tablet
  (75 - 6919, n=66, last 2 years)
837 Points +675%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
625 Points +479%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
108 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (102 - 111, n=5)
107 Points -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
75 Points -31%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Tablet
  (72 - 6909, n=64, last 2 years)
887 Points +770%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
864 Points +747%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
609 Points +497%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (100 - 107, n=4)
102.5 Points 0%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
102 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
72 Points -29%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +342%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
19 fps +296%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
19 fps +296%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.8 - 15, n=13)
10.5 fps +119%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
4.8 fps
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3 fps -37%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
38 fps +358%
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years)
35.5 fps +328%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
29 fps +249%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
8.3 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)
8.27 fps 0%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps -53%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years)
14.3 fps +393%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
13 fps +348%
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
13 fps +348%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)
6.43 fps +122%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.9 fps
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.9 fps -34%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
15 fps +436%
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years)
13.2 fps +371%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
10 fps +257%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
2.8 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)
2.78 fps -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps -50%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
6.6 fps +450%
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 48, n=68, last 2 years)
6.22 fps +418%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4.8 fps +300%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
1.2 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)
1.133 fps -6%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
0.6 fps -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33918 Points +249%
Average of class Tablet
  (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +137%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
18755 Points +93%
Onyx Boox TabX
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 6144
9714 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8893 - 10247, n=14)
9495 Points -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5022 Points -48%
Onyx Boox TabXOnyx Boox Tab Ultra C ProLenovo Smart PaperHuawei MatePad PaperAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
118%
-54%
65%
60%
124%
Sequential Read 256KB
514.4
1487
189%
163
-68%
880.1
71%
Sequential Write 256KB
109.5
302.2
176%
139
27%
256.2
134%
Random Read 4KB
137.8
226.8
65%
25.3
-82%
145.6
6%
152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113)
11%
Random Write 4KB
121.7
169.9
40%
8.8
-93%
183.1
50%

温度

Max. Load
 22.9 °C23.6 °C23.6 °C 
 23.3 °C29.2 °C24.4 °C 
 22.9 °C26.5 °C24.5 °C 
Maximum: 29.2 °C
Average: 24.5 °C
23.9 °C24.7 °C24.7 °C
25.2 °C28 °C25.3 °C
25 °C26.9 °C24.8 °C
Maximum: 28 °C
Average: 25.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 24.5 °C / 76 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


正面热图
正面热图
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Onyx Boox TabX Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.671 (0.662-0.682)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.53 (4.51-4.71)
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.447 (0.4391-0.4529)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.74 (3.73-3.75)
Onyx Boox TabX Adreno 610, SD 662, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.27 (2.26-2.27)
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.1 (15.8-17.5)
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.233.32530.331.53124.121.54031.428.75037.333.76325.924.48019.518.210016.517.412513.71316013.719.52009.224.12508.323.73156.730.54007375008.845.26308.348.98008.953100010.759.312508.766.516009.169.720009.765.9250010.661.2315011.35440001261.8500012.959.1630013.760.8800014.464.51000015.362.9125001661160001764.5SPL23.975.4N0.530.1median 10.7median 59.1Delta2.715.543.939.334.536.227.729.728.535.633.235.226.334.823.432.422.538.215.443.714.649.612.352.313.357.711.659.77.562.811.467.815.266.814.769.811.872.7127310.376.29.372.310.869.814.767.614.358.914.964.11566.615.46316.856.416.151.91754.225.982.10.750.6median 14.6median 632.17.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnyx Boox TabXHuawei MatePad Paper
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Onyx Boox TabX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 37.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 88% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei MatePad Paper audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet
  (746 - 5003, n=52, last 2 years)
1934 min +30%
Onyx Boox TabX
6300 mAh
1486 min
Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro
4600 mAh
1244 min
Lenovo Smart Paper
3500 mAh
1056 min
Huawei MatePad Paper
3625 mAh
963 min
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 46min

Pros

+ 电池寿命长
+ Android-应用程序支持
+ 精确触摸屏
+ 笔输入
+ 大尺寸哑光电子墨水显示屏
+ ...具有良好的可读性
+ 负载时几乎不发热

Cons

- 价格昂贵
- 性能一般
- 不含充电器
- 扬声器声音微弱
- 充电速度慢
- 无物理滚动按钮
- 底盘似乎很脆弱

评价:屏幕空间大,但也有局限性

评测中:测试设备由 Onyx Boox Tab X 提供:
评测中:测试设备由 Onyx Boox Tab X 提供:
KEX GmbH

Onyx Boox Tab X 是一款拥有超大屏幕的非凡电子墨水平板电脑。支持数字转换器和使用Android 应用程序的选项使该设备更加灵活。其超长的运行时间令人印象深刻,设备几乎不发热,拥有高品质的外观,并提供可精确操作的触摸屏。

不过,对于不到 950 欧元的价格,你可以对某些方面有更高的要求:所使用的 SoC 和闪存速度相当慢,外壳由金属合金制成,但看起来有点脆弱,而且电池充电时间很长。包装中没有随附充电器,扬声器的声音也很弱,我们还缺少一个 microSD 插槽以及用于滚动和音量控制的物理按键。其他设备的无线局域网速度也更快。

不过,如果你主要想用它来阅读文件和记笔记,那么你将得到一台几乎能以原始尺寸显示 DIN A4 纸张的平板电脑,它具有高对比度和出色的可读性。

Onyx Boox Tab X 非常大,价格昂贵,而且由于支持Android 应用程序,使用起来非常灵活,使用寿命也很长。电子墨水平板电脑非常适合学习文件和做笔记,但也有一些弱点。

敢于将这种屏幕尺寸用于电子墨水平板电脑的其他制造商并不多。大多数竞争对手的 10.3 英寸都略小一些,而 Onyx Boox Tab Ultra C Pro则采用了彩色屏幕,而且价格更低,性能更高。如果你觉得黑白面板就足够了,那么 联想智能纸MatePad Paper将节省更多的钱。

价格和供应情况

Onyx Boox Tab X 现已上市。在撰写评论时,美国亚马逊上该设备的售价略低于 900 美元

Onyx Boox TabX - 02/04/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80 / 98 → 82%
Keyboard
65 / 80 → 82%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
29 / 70 → 42%
Weight
82 / 40-88 → 88%
Battery
90%
Display
72%
Games Performance
14 / 78 → 18%
Application Performance
42 / 92 → 46%
Temperature
97%
Noise
100%
Audio
52 / 91 → 57%
Average
68%
79%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Onyx Boox Tab X 评测--适合大型任务的电子墨水平板电脑?
Florian Schmitt, 2024-02- 8 (Update: 2024-02- 8)