结论 - Nothing 耳机 (1) 令人信服
凭借耳机 (1)，Nothing 首次在耳罩式耳机领域亮相，便引起了人们的关注。这不仅是因为它的设计与众不同，还因为它没有任何用于控制的传感器表面，这使它从众多竞争对手中脱颖而出。虽然这看起来有点怀旧，但在日常使用中绝对是一个附加值，尤其是按钮的位置很好，可以直观地操作。没有被动模式则不那么令人怀念。
在声音方面，耳机 (1) 的声音丰富而有深度，只是高频稍弱，因此只能在一定程度上推荐给发烧友。此外，耳机的缓冲元件必须送去更换，这也是一个遗憾。
Pros
Cons
规格无耳机 (1)
| 佩戴方式 | 耳罩式 |
| 连接性 | 蓝牙 5.3、USB-C、3.5 毫米音频插孔 |
| 扬声器 | 40 毫米动态驱动器，20 - 40.000 Hz，KEF 音效 |
| 音频编解码器 | SBC、AAC、LDAC |
| 电池 | 1040 mAh |
| 充电端口 | USB-C |
| 无线充电 | 不提供 |
| 重量 | 329 克 |
| 固件版本 | 1.0.1.67 |
| 交货包括 | 耳机、旅行包、USB-C 数据线、音频线 (3.5 mm) |
| 价格 | 299美元 |
Nothing耳机（1）是这家总部位于伦敦的公司首次推出的产品，希望采取与竞争对手不同的方式。它们希望以不同寻常的设计、完全依赖物理控制的方式和良好的音质给人留下深刻印象。
这款耳机的零售价为 299 美元，当然并不便宜，但比竞争对手的同类产品便宜。
设计和人体工学 - 耳机 (1) 通过 IP52 认证
Nothing 耳机 (1) 的底座由铝制机身和顶部的透明塑料元件组成，展现了 Nothing 的典型设计。这款耳机重 329 克，重量不算轻，但柔软的人造皮革和头带衬垫让佩戴非常舒适，即使长时间使用也不会感到不适。此外，耳机还为自己的耳朵留出了足够的空间。
这款耳机还通过了 IP52 认证，因此可以防止有害灰尘和水滴进入。
可持续性 - 耳垫不可更换
Nothing Headphone (1) 耳机采用无塑料包装，二氧化碳排放量为 14.84 千克（生命周期）。用户无法对其进行维修，甚至连耳垫都必须送去更换。
功能和控制 - 不依赖按钮而不是传感器
Google Fast Pair 和 Microsoft Swift Pair 可用于配对 Nothing 耳机 (1)。如果您想手动启动蓝牙配对，耳机内侧有一个不起眼的按钮。此外，还可以通过 USB-C 或 3.5 毫米插孔连接耳机。遗憾的是，如果电池电量耗尽，则不支持被动模式。耳机通过滑动开关打开。
耳机可通过连接的设备或耳机 (1) 上的物理按钮进行操作。耳机上有一个滚轴，可以滚动（音量控制）或按下（启动/停止，长按：ANC 开/关）。还有一个拨杆，可以用来跳到下一曲或上一曲；如果按住时间较长，还可以倒带，前提是应用支持倒带。AI 按钮可用于启动语音或 AI 助手。
通过Nothing X应用程序可以进行许多设置并安装固件更新。按键设置也可以在这里查看和自定义。
电池续航时间长达 80 小时。如果使用 LDAC 和 ANC，则会缩短至 30 小时。快速充电功能可让耳机在两小时内充满电。播放时间超过两小时（使用 ANC）仅需五分钟。
声音 - 无耳机（1）提供均衡的音频性能
耳机由英国音频专家KEF 进行微调。.Nothing 耳机 (1) 的两个 40 毫米动圈驱动单元采用聚氨酯振膜，扬声器的边缘和球顶均有镀镍涂层，音质非常好，中音清晰，低音强劲。只是高频稍弱，清晰度稍差，但只有使用适当音源的音响发烧友才会注意到这一点。
通过 LDAC，高分辨率编解码器可用于蓝牙和 USB，3.5 毫米插孔连接也可用作输入设备。Nothing 耳机 (1) 还支持空间音频、可定制的均衡器和低音增强器。
透明模式噪音低，主动降噪（ANC）非常有效。不过，后者还达不到 Bose 或索尼顶级型号的水平，但差别也不大。不过，如果耳机受到压力，或者靠在耳机上时耳机滑落，都会使 ANC 效果变差。耳机能清晰地再现电话通话，但 Nothing Headphone (1) 的用户听起来有些空洞和刺耳。
| Loudspeakers | |
| THD | |
| Teufel Real Blue Pro (RMS: -0.6 dBFS) | |
| Bose QuietComfort 45 (RMS: -2.7 dBFS) | |
| Nothing Headphone (1) (RMS: -1.1 dBFS) | |
| THD+N | |
| Bose QuietComfort 45 (RMS: -2.7 dBFS) | |
| Teufel Real Blue Pro (RMS: -0.6 dBFS) | |
| Nothing Headphone (1) (RMS: -1.1 dBFS) | |
* ... smaller is better
THD（总谐波失真）：谐波失真量化了非线性成分（谐波内容）相对于原始信号所造成的失真。THD 特指基波成分。值得注意的是，虽然 "失真系数 "一词经常被交替使用，但它实际上指的是整个信号，而不仅仅是基波分量。
THD+N（总谐波失真 + 噪音）：该值与 THD 相似，但除了测量谐波的干扰功率外，还将噪声的影响作为有效值考虑在内。测量时，通过被测耳机回放低谐波正弦信号（通常为 1 kHz，> 0 dB）。然后用一个线性测量麦克风（测量距离约为 0.40 英寸）记录该信号。
这两个值均以百分比表示。数值越小，信号的保真度越高。
Nothing Headphone (1) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Teufel Real Blue Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (97.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
