采用轻质金属外壳的独奏娱乐和生产力盒子 -Honor Pad 10 平板电脑评测

Name: Honor Pad 10
Brand: Honor

经济实惠的平板电脑，适合各种场合使用。

除了具有 120 Hz 刷新率的 IPS 显示屏外，12.1 英寸Honor Pad 10 还提供 6 个扬声器，并可在同样的年限内接受Android 更新。压力感应笔和蓝牙键盘盖等可选输入设备意味着这款快速平板电脑还能用于生产。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 08/31/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

判决

Honor Pad 10 是一款设备齐全的大型中档平板电脑。它的高品质手感、支持手写笔的无 PWM 显示屏和慷慨的更新政策尤其让人印象深刻。

得益于 120 Hz 的刷新率和 Snapdragon 7Gen3，这款铝制Android 运行起来也非常流畅，可以流畅地显示《源氏冲击》等重量级游戏。得益于良好的扬声器系统，音效也恰到好处。

Test device courtesy of Honor Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

除了娱乐性和生产力之外，Pad 10 还得忍受批评。这款平板电脑缺少指纹传感器和 GPS 模块。此外，还只有速度较慢的 USB-C 2.0，蓝牙编解码器也很少，而且由于没有移动网络版本，只能通过 WiFi 上网。

Pros

+ 轻巧坚固的铝制外壳

+ 120 Hz 刷新率

+ 6 年更新

+ 蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6

+ 良好的扬声器系统

+ 强大的 SoC

+ 电池寿命长

+ 充电功率高达 35 瓦

+ 可选配笔和键盘

Cons

- 仅 USB 2.0

- 无移动无线电选件

- 无 GPS 模块

- 无 NFC 模块

- 无指纹传感器

- 普通摄像头

- 蓝牙编解码器数量少

- 内存不可扩展

价格和供应情况

Honor Pad 10 可在Honor 网上商店和亚马逊上购买，价格为 300 欧元（约合 350 美元）。和亚马逊上有售，售价 300 欧元（约合 350 美元）。如果您直接从Honor 购买平板电脑，在测试时，手写笔和蓝牙键盘是免费赠送的。

$20.69

AKABEILA Compatible with Honor Pad 10 2025 12.1 inch Tablet Case, Kids Friendly Universal Lightweight Shockproof Protective Case with Shoulder Strap & Stand Handle Yellow

$12.29
BMPNLSZ TPU Cover for Honor Pad 10, Black Flexible Silicone Slim fit Soft Shell Cute Back Case Bumper Rubber Protective Case (12,1") - Rosered
$14.82
ORANXIN Case for Honor Pad 10 Model HEY3-W00 Tablet 12.1 inch Release 2025 Soft Silicone Shockproof Adjustable Stand Rubber Shell Protective Cover

判决
规格
保护套 -Honor Pad 10，采用坚固的铝合金一体成型机身
功能 -Honor 平板电脑仅提供 WiFi 版本
软件 -Honor Pad 10 获得 6 年更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor Pad 10 配有 WiFi 6，但没有 GPS
摄像头 - 2x 800 万像素，用于拍摄快照
配件和保修 - 可选配笔和蓝牙键盘
输入设备和操作 - 可自动增亮显示屏的人脸识别功能
显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 面板
性能 -Honor Pad 10，搭载骁龙 7 代 3 处理器
游戏 -Honor 平板电脑也适合作为游戏平台
排放 - 配备 6 个扬声器的超酷平板电脑
电池续航时间 -Honor Pad 10 续航时间长
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

大而实惠--这是平板电脑最受欢迎的组合。为Honor Pad 10 拉开帷幕吧，因为这款 12.1 英寸的平板电脑售价仅为 300 欧元（约合 350 美元），但仍具有强大的功能。我们的测试显示了它在中端市场的表现。

规格

Honor Pad 10 (Pad Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A715 / A510

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 720

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4X

Display

12.10 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, 500 nits typical brightness, 1500:1 typical contrast ratio, 60/90/120 Hz refresh rate, 10 Bit color, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 226 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Honor Connect

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 6.29 x 277.07 x 179.28

Battery

10100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 35W max. charging speed

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, AF), video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.0, FF), video recording up to 1080p@30fps

Additional features

Speakers: six speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, quick start guide, warranty information, MagicOS 9, 24 Months Warranty, aluminium frame; HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; Bluetooth codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptX HD; Update policy: 6 years of Android updates, 6 years of security patches; DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, fanless

Weight

525 g

Price

300 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

保护套 -Honor Pad 10，采用坚固的铝合金一体成型机身

Honor Pad 10 采用坚固的铝合金一体成型机身，手感和外观一样优质。IPS 显示屏在重压下会出现轻微的图像伪影，但不会摇晃或吱吱作响。

Honor Pad 10 雾灰色的重量为 525 克（约 18 盎司），是较轻的 12.x 英寸平板电脑之一，厚度仅为 6 毫米多一点（约 0.24 英寸），非常平整。它的显示屏边框四边宽约 7 毫米（约 0.28 英寸），给Honor 平板电脑带来了对称和相对现代的外观。

800 万像素主摄像头位于突出机身几毫米的圆形边框中，这意味着平板电脑放在桌面上时仅有很小的倾斜度。

尺寸比较

功能 -Honor 平板电脑仅提供 WiFi 版本

在功能方面，Honor Pad 10 显示出其节俭的一面。虽然有 6 个扬声器、蓝牙 5.3 和 WiFi 6，但 USB-C 端口仍然是 USB 2.0，内部内存无法扩展，也没有 GPS 模块或手机选件。

软件 -Honor Pad 10 获得 6 年更新

Honor Pad 10运行基于Android 15的MagicOS 9.0。Honor ，并承诺为其平板电脑提供6年的Android 和安全更新，这使其与Apple 和三星等竞争对手不相上下。每季度发布一次安全更新。.

除了办公套件（Honor 文档）外，MagicOS 9.0 还包括一些人工智能功能，如字幕生成或撰写文本时的写作建议。此外，窗口显示、分屏视图和 Magic Portal 也使操作更加简便。

其中，Magic Portal 功能允许用户将图片或文本拖动到显示在侧面的兼容应用程序中。例如，可以针对所选内容启动 YouTube 搜索，人工智能还能识别涉及的产品。

可持续性

Honor 没有提供任何关于 Pad 10 的_二氧化碳足迹的信息。不过，该制造商提供了有关其可持续发展努力的全面信息，其目标是到 2045 年实现_二氧化碳零排放。Honor Pad 10 的包装采用大豆油墨印刷，并用塑料薄膜包裹。

Honor 提供自我修复平台除了原装备件和工具外，还提供维修说明。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor Pad 10 配有 WiFi 6，但没有 GPS

Honor 平板电脑使用 Wi-Fi 6 作为最快的 Wi-Fi 标准，但无法访问 6 GHz 频段，与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，传输速率并不稳定。不过，传输速度还是很高的，在接收方向上能达到清晰的四位数。

Networking
Honor Pad 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	585 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1359 (min: 970) MBit/s ∼85%
Honor Pad 9 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	366 (min: 184) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	349 (min: 171) MBit/s ∼22%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	740 (min: 571) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	949 (min: 754) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1623 (min: 1396) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1698 (min: 1105) MBit/s ∼100%
OnePlus Pad 2 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	895 (min: 675) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1652 (min: 1472) MBit/s ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	528 (min: 438) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1596 (min: 1524) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	834 (min: 295) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	827 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1172 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1252 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼74%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	543 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	599 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1222 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1409 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼83%

Honor Pad 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø585 (401-759)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø528 (438-633)

Honor Pad 10 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1359 (970-1586)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1524-1625)

摄像头 - 2x 800 万像素，用于拍摄快照

Honor Pad 10 配备了 800 万像素固定对焦自拍摄像头。背面还有一个 800 万像素自动对焦主摄像头。视频录制最高可达 1080p，每秒 30 帧。

这对双摄像头拍摄的照片效果尚可，色彩浓郁温暖，但几乎看不出任何细节，清晰度不高，在弱光环境下很快就会达到极限。不过，在视频通话、快照或拍摄文件时，图像质量还不错。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight Daylight Lowlight

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修 - 可选配笔和蓝牙键盘

平板电脑随附 USB-C 连接线、快速入门指南和保修卡。

除了各种电源适配器外，Honor 还在其在线商店提供适合 Pad 10 的其他配件，包括一支触控笔（Honor Choice THNCHOP Pencil50欧元/~58美元）和蓝牙键盘（深灰色智能蓝牙键盘，60 欧元/约合 70 美元）。

输入设备和操作 - 可自动增亮显示屏的人脸识别功能

Honor Pad 10 的 2.5K 显示屏能快速、准确地响应输入。在标准设置中，IPS 面板会根据显示内容自动调整刷新率，然后以 60、90 或 120 Hz 的频率运行。

平板电脑只能通过二维面部识别进行生物识别登录。这种方式并不十分安全，但运行可靠。在环境光线较暗的情况下，平板电脑会自动调亮显示屏。

选配的蓝牙键盘还可用作保护盖，并将平板电脑固定在 70 度左右的角度。它的按键反馈相对较软，而且不发光，但因键程较短而得分。

选配的Honor Pencil 有 4096 级压力，可实现精确输入。不过，由于笔无法通过磁力吸附在平板电脑上，因此必须小心不要弄丢。与键盘一样，它通过 USB-C 接口充电。

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 面板

Honor 在白色背景下，Pad 10 几乎完全达到了 500 cd/m² 的亮度。在较小的图像区域（APL18），其亮度最高可达 539 cd/m²。这足以满足室内使用。

显示屏不需要 PWM 进行亮度控制，非常适合敏感用户使用。屏幕设置（如蓝光过滤器、昼夜节律夜间显示和散焦功能）也很容易保护眼睛。


490 cd/m²	495 cd/m²	499 cd/m²
502 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	499 cd/m²
482 cd/m²	502 cd/m²	493 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 529 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 499 cd/m² Minimum: 2.04 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 529 cd/m²
Contrast: 1058:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
CCT: 7398 K

	Honor Pad 10 IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"	Honor Pad 9 IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"	OnePlus Pad 2 IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Screen		6%	-20%	29%	-10%
Brightness middle	529	613 16%	409 -23%	833 57%	513 -3%
Brightness	499	570 14%	388 -22%	771 55%	480 -4%
Brightness Distribution	91	87 -4%	89 -2%	84 -8%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.5	0.4 20%	0.4 20%	0.45 10%	0.4 20%
Contrast	1058	1533 45%	1023 -3%	1851 75%	1283 21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	2.7 -35%	3.46 -73%	1.79 10%	2.82 -41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.79	5.1 -6%	5.46 -14%	4.01 16%	8.83 -84%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.6	3.7 -3%	5.2 -44%	3 17%	2.9 19%
Gamma	2.248 ^98%	2.3 ^96%	2.106 ^104%	2.254 ^98%	2.265 ^97%
CCT	7398 ^88%	6763 ^96%	5823 ^112%	6419 ^101%	7189 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8276 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

如果将色彩模式和色温都设置为 "正常"，屏幕就能显示最佳色彩。只是 7398 K 的色温不太准确，会使显示屏略微偏蓝。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.6 ms rise
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
24.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.5 ms rise
24.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).

如果避免在明亮的环境中使用，Honor Pad 10 在户外也能很好地使用。视角稳定的 IPS 面板亮度不够，无法充分补偿光线反射，从而遮挡了内容的视线。

性能 -Honor Pad 10，搭载骁龙 7 代 3 处理器

配备骁龙 7 代 3Honor Pad 10 配备的处理器在同价位产品中性能相当强劲，可以处理日常任务，不会出现卡顿或抱怨。高通 SoC 只有在使用非常复杂的应用程序时才会达到极限。

Honor Pad 10 比其前代产品 Honor Pad 9以及小米红米Pad Pro的骁龙7代2.另一方面，随着联想 Idea Tab Pro配备了联发科 Dimensity 8300Honor Pad 10 不得不认输。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1440 Points +24%
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=99, last 2 years)	1339 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (1147 - 1195, n=4)	1162 Points 0%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	1158 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	1007 Points -13%
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	954 Points -18%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	944 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4674 Points +47%
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	4564 Points +43%
Average of class Tablet (848 - 14690, n=99, last 2 years)	4229 Points +33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (3129 - 3410, n=4)	3228 Points +1%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	3183 Points
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	2773 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	2616 Points -18%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1234789 Points +54%
Average of class Tablet (164396 - 2854581, n=66, last 2 years)	1005379 Points +25%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	801418 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (767395 - 801418, n=3)	783533 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	612145 Points -24%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	490448 Points -39%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	20813 Points +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (12857 - 15165, n=4)	14068 Points 0%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	14028 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	12802 Points -9%
OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	12156 Points -13%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	11693 Points -17%
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 27428, n=87, last 2 years)	11556 Points -18%

CrossMark - Overall
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1062 Points +46%
Average of class Tablet (227 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)	910 Points +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	747 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (715 - 759, n=4)	739 Points +2%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	725 Points
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	689 Points -5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	7584 Points +24%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	6132 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (5948 - 6132, n=4)	6044 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=69, last 2 years)	5301 Points -14%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	4233 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	4151 Points -32%
System
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	10083 Points +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (9646 - 11239, n=4)	10048 Points +4%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	9648 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	9324 Points -3%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	9280 Points -4%
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=69, last 2 years)	8443 Points -12%
Memory
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	8586 Points +19%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	7203 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (5719 - 7203, n=4)	6479 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=69, last 2 years)	6219 Points -14%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	4837 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	3222 Points -55%
Graphics
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	24475 Points +85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (13253 - 14427, n=4)	13569 Points +2%
Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=69, last 2 years)	13348 Points +1%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	13253 Points
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	5783 Points -56%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	4622 Points -65%
Web
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1696 Points +10%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	1536 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (1481 - 1543, n=4)	1523 Points -1%
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=69, last 2 years)	1430 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	1297 Points -16%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	1192 Points -22%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	55840 Points +672%
Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=69, last 2 years)	13051 Points +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (7232 - 9791, n=3)	8669 Points +20%
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	7236 Points 0%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	7232 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	7223 Points 0%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	38990 Points +5651%
Average of class Tablet (138 - 156427, n=61, last 2 years)	7119 Points +950%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (678 - 717, n=3)	701 Points +3%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	678 Points
Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192	644 Points -5%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Tablet (211 - 1483, n=13, last 2 years)	514 Points +128%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	225 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (n=1)	225 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.4
Average of class Tablet (154 - 9666, n=13, last 2 years)	1717 Points +615%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	240 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (n=1)	240 Points 0%
Quantized NPU 1.4
Average of class Tablet (88 - 13178, n=13, last 2 years)	2564 Points +344%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	577 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (n=1)	577 Points 0%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet (66.1 - 8305, n=9, last 2 years)	1527 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144	456 Points
Score V6
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=19, last 2 years)	2541 Points +68%
Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 8192	1517 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (n=1)	1517 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	948 Points -38%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4454 Points +205%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2497 Points +71%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1459 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	779 Points -47%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	611 Points -58%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4485 Points +207%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2677 Points +83%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1462 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	789 Points -46%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	618 Points -58%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5457 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2998 Points -45%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2402 Points -56%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1796 Points -67%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1626 Points +233%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	489 Points

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1639 Points +236%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1067 Points +119%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	488 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	143 fps +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	79 fps +32%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps -2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	316 fps +78%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	178 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	122 fps -31%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	105 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	88 fps +54%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps -26%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps -39%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	177 fps +62%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	72 fps -34%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -43%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps +20%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -37%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	24 fps -48%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	123 fps +46%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	84 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	53 fps -37%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	46 fps -45%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	34 fps +31%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -42%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11 fps -58%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	73 fps +52%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	48 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -40%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps -52%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +83%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	28 fps +22%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -52%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.4 fps -59%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps +156%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps +22%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	13 fps -52%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11.2 fps -59%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps +43%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	37 fps +6%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	35 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -49%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	15 fps -57%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	170 fps +154%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82 fps +22%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -49%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -54%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps +167%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15 fps +25%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.9 fps -51%
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4.8 fps -60%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)	137.835 Points +74%
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 393, n=73, last 2 years)	135 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)	116.621 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (79.3 - 144.9, n=4)	115.6 Points +46%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	88.235 Points +11%
Honor Pad 10 (Chrome 139.0.7258.62)	79.252 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)	186 runs/min +31%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 603, n=64, last 2 years)	168.3 runs/min +19%
Honor Pad 10 (Chrome 139.0.7258.62)	142 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (121 - 147, n=3)	136.7 runs/min -4%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	86.6 runs/min -39%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 36.8, n=54, last 2 years)	13.7 runs/min +123%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)	10.9 runs/min +78%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (6.14 - 7.84, n=3)	7.01 runs/min +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)	6.72 runs/min +9%
Honor Pad 10 (Chrome 139.0.7258.62)	6.14 runs/min
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	4.74 runs/min -23%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)	144 Points +122%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 315, n=77, last 2 years)	122.9 Points +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)	112 Points +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (65 - 126, n=3)	98 Points +51%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	95 Points +46%
Honor Pad 10 (Chrome 139.0.7258.62)	65 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)	45579 Points +51%
OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)	45083 Points +49%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=104, last 2 years)	37127 Points +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (30250 - 42068, n=4)	36747 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)	34923 Points +15%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	32436 Points +7%
Honor Pad 10 (Chrome 139.0.7258.62)	30250 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 27101, n=86, last 2 years)	2741 ms * -196%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)	1321.1 ms * -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)	1151.6 ms * -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (925 - 1157, n=3)	1077 ms * -16%
Honor Pad 10 (Chrome 139.0.7258.62)	924.7 ms *
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro (Chrome 132)	904.3 ms * +2%

* ... smaller is better

	Honor Pad 10	Honor Pad 9	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro	OnePlus Pad 2	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-20%	77%	-7%	-47%	-18%	-31%
Sequential Read 256KB	1918.12	1921.34 0%	3648.3 90%	2003.1 4%	844.9 -56%	1736 ?(950 - 2037, n=111) -9%	1522 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=89, last 2 years) -21%
Sequential Write 256KB	1632.94	1222.83 -25%	3298.5 102%	1732.7 6%	705.3 -57%	1176 ?(166.8 - 2004, n=111) -28%	1118 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=89, last 2 years) -32%
Random Read 4KB	342.88	256.06 -25%	474.4 38%	236.5 -31%	215.5 -37%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=111) -17%	225 ?(20.1 - 475, n=89, last 2 years) -34%
Random Write 4KB	375.28	266.17 -29%	668 78%	348.6 -7%	231.4 -38%	314 ?(62.6 - 499, n=112) -16%	241 ?(9.1 - 745, n=89, last 2 years) -36%

游戏 -Honor 平板电脑也适合作为游戏平台

Gamebench-帧率显示，游戏在Honor 平板电脑上运行良好。重磅图形游戏《源氏冲击》在最高细节设置下仍能以平均每秒 40 帧的速度运行，高清设置下的《PUBG Mobile》也是如此。

Honor Pad 10; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø52.6 (41-60)

Honor Pad 10; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.8.0_35245262_35356052: Ø40.1 (24-58)

Honor Pad 10; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.9.0: Ø59.8 (58-60)

Honor Pad 10; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.9.0: Ø39.7 (35-41)

排放 - 配备 6 个扬声器的超酷平板电脑

温度

Honor Pad 10 在运行过程中几乎没有温差，即使将其推到最大也是如此。3DMark 压力测试表明，它几乎在任何时候都能发挥全部性能。

Max. Load

Idle


38.7 °C	35.9 °C	39.9 °C
36.7 °C	34.2 °C	33.2 °C
29.9 °C	31.6 °C	30.8 °C

Maximum: 39.9 °C
Average: 34.5 °C


40 °C	39.7 °C	38.2 °C
35.6 °C	34.9 °C	37.2 °C
31.2 °C	32.1 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 35.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.6 % 0%
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.6 %
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	79.6 % -20%
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 % -23%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.8 %
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % -1%
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	83.8 % -16%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83.4 % -16%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	92.3 %
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86.9 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.1 %
OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86.5 % -13%
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	80.3 % -19%

Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.72 (8.72-8.73)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.5 (11.1-13.4)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)

Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.7 (31.6-31.7)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.2 (38-47.8)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)

Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø32.6 (32.6-32.6)

Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø11 (10.7-11.6)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5)

Honor Pad 10 Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø3.62 (3.6-3.64)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.7 (6.29-7.83)

OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)

发言人

Honor 平板电脑的 6 个扬声器可产生低音但良好的立体声。在全音量下，Pad 10 可以轻松地让较大的房间充满音效，不过声音会变得稀疏，扬声器也会失真。在中等音量下，扬声器会将其均衡的中高音展现得淋漓尽致。

外置音频设备可通过 USB-C 和蓝牙 5.3 与平板电脑连接。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Pad 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 -Honor Pad 10 续航时间长

能源消耗

Pad 10 配备 10100 毫安时电池，充电功率高达 35 瓦。在测试中，我们使用了 65 瓦的 Ugreen 2C1A 电源装置，平板电脑在 1:48 小时内完成了一个完整的充电周期。充电至 80% 需要 1:25 小时。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	4.4 / 4.7 / 5.2 Watt
Load	8.5 / 11.3 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Honor Pad 10 10100 mAh	Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		-23%	38%	33%	39%	15%
Idle Minimum *	4.4	1.5 66%	1.2 73%	1.7 61%	1.92 ?(0.46 - 4.4, n=3) 56%	2.01 ?(0.63 - 5.6, n=81, last 2 years) 54%
Idle Average *	4.7	8.39 -79%	1.8 62%	2.2 53%	2.37 ?(1.12 - 4.7, n=3) 50%	3.75 ?(1 - 9.2, n=81, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	5.2	8.46 -63%	2.8 46%	2.9 44%	2.72 ?(1.36 - 5.2, n=3) 48%	4.09 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=81, last 2 years) 21%
Load Average *	8.5	11.65 -37%	7.9 7%	5.8 32%	6.65 ?(4.8 - 8.5, n=2) 22%	9.19 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=77, last 2 years) -8%
Load Maximum *	11.3	11.67 -3%	10.8 4%	13.9 -23%	9 ?(6.7 - 11.3, n=2) 20%	12.8 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=77, last 2 years) -13%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.01 (4.62-11.3)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.55 (2.2-10.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.65 (5.85-14.8)

Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.95 (4.79-5.25)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.157-2.78)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.88 (6.65-9.74)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.5-10.8)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.57 (6.35-6.93)

Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.95 (4.79-5.25)

Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.247 (1.157-2.78)

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

电池寿命

Honor Pad 10 的电池续航时间高于平均水平，看一天连续剧或上网应该不成问题。

在 WLAN 测试中，该平板电脑以 14:39 小时的成绩将几乎所有对比设备甩在身后，尽管有时领先优势很小。只有小米红米平板 Pro的续航时间更长，因为它在 45 分钟后才熄灯。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		14h 39min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Pad 10 10100 mAh	879 min
Honor Pad 9 8300 mAh	661 min
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 10200 mAh	798 min
OnePlus Pad 2 9510 mAh	866 min
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro 10000 mAh	924 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

Honor Pad 10 是一款高品质的 12.1 英寸平板电脑，由于采用了骁龙 7 代 3 处理器，运行流畅，还可与手写笔和蓝牙键盘配合使用。不过，它在功能方面还存在一些不足，例如缺少指纹传感器和 GPS 模块。

Back to the verdict

Honor Pad 10 - 08/29/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

85 / 98 → 86%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

37 / 69 → 54%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 89%

Battery

90%

Display

84%

Games Performance

24 / 65 → 37%

Application Performance

60 / 92 → 65%

AI Performance

16%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

82 / 91 → 90%

Camera

57 / 90 → 63%

Average

66%

82%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
40%

Power Use
92.4%

Repairability
80%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 60.4%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 81.5%	Honor Pad 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 720 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $20.69 AKABEILA Compatible with Hon... 2. $12.29 BMPNLSZ TPU Cover for Honor ... 3. $14.82 ORANXIN Case for Honor Pad 1... List Price: 300 Euro	525 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS
2. 84.8% ^{v7 (old)}	Honor Pad 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $12.95 Mr.Shield Screen Protector C... 2. $12.99 Protective Case for Huawei H... 3. $34.99 Magnetic Detachable Wireless... List Price: 350€	555 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS LCD
3. 82.3%	Lenovo Idea Tab Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $361.42 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo... 2. $329.00 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro, 12.7" 3... 3. $321.99 Lenovo Idea Tab Pro TB373FU ... List Price: 379€	620 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS
4. 86.1%	OnePlus Pad 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: $499.99 List Price: 549€	584 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12.10" 3000x2120 304 PPI IPS
5. 78.7%	Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘ 6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1	Amazon: $290.00 List Price: 380€	571 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS

采用轻质金属外壳的独奏娱乐和生产力盒子 -Honor Pad 10 平板电脑评测

经济实惠的平板电脑，适合各种场合使用。

判决

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

保护套 -Honor Pad 10，采用坚固的铝合金一体成型机身

尺寸比较

功能 -Honor 平板电脑仅提供 WiFi 版本

软件 -Honor Pad 10 获得 6 年更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 -Honor Pad 10 配有 WiFi 6，但没有 GPS

摄像头 - 2x 800 万像素，用于拍摄快照

配件和保修 - 可选配笔和蓝牙键盘

输入设备和操作 - 可自动增亮显示屏的人脸识别功能

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 面板

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 -Honor Pad 10，搭载骁龙 7 代 3 处理器

游戏 -Honor 平板电脑也适合作为游戏平台

排放 - 配备 6 个扬声器的超酷平板电脑

温度

3DMarkSteel Nomad 压力测试

发言人

Honor Pad 10 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro audio analysis

电池续航时间 -Honor Pad 10 续航时间长

能源消耗

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

More articles related to this device

Transparency