荣耀Magicbook （英特尔 i5-8250U版对比 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U版）笔记本电脑评测

Name: Honor Magicbook
Brand: Honor

寻找那份“Magic”…… 荣耀作为一个手机厂商在欧洲已经立足有段时间了，而华为也在最近发布了自己的笔记本电脑，只不过目前仅在亚洲市场上市。我们手里拿到了两台不同配置的荣耀Magicbook，他们分别采用了英特尔和AMD的处理器。

J. Simon Leitner, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 11/22/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook AMD Ryzen (Zen) Ultrabook Geforce Chinese Tech

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Honor Magicbook (Magicbook Series)

Processor

Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB VRAM, Core: 1468 MHz, Memory: 6008 MHz, GDDR5, 388.75, Optimus

Memory

8 GB

, Dual-channel

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BEO0764 (TV140FHM-NH0), IPS LED, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Storage

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, 256 GB

, 256 GB SSD

Soundcard

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 323 x 221

Battery

56 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: Webcam
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Additional features

Keyboard Light: yes

Weight

1.442 kg, Power Supply: 198 g

Price

780 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Honor Magicbook (Magicbook Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4 x 2 - 3.6 GHz, Zen

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) - 1024 MB VRAM, DDR4 SDRAM, 23.20.815.6144

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR4 Dual-Channel

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE0764 (TV140FHM-NH0), glossy: no

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Storage

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, 256 GB

Soundcard

AMD Raven - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Headset

Networking

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16 x 323 x 221

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 1 MPix

Weight

1.444 kg, Power Supply: 198 g

Price

600 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Dell Latitude 3490 HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng HP 14-ma0312ng Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Honor Magicbook DIN A4 ❌

Right side: 3.5 mm headset jack, USB 2.0

Left side: USB Type-C (power connector), HDMI, USB 3.0

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	670 MBit/s +7%
Honor Magicbook Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	642 (613^min - 660^max) MBit/s +2%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	629 MBit/s 0%
Honor Magicbook Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	628 (281^min - 654^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	602 MBit/s -4%
Dell Latitude 3490 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	536 (538^P1) MBit/s -15%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	289 MBit/s -54%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	287 MBit/s -54%
HP 14-ma0312ng Realtek RTL8723DE	97 MBit/s -85%
iperf3 receive AX12
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	659 MBit/s +22%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Realtek 8822BE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	649 MBit/s +20%
Dell Latitude 3490 Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	580 (584^P1) MBit/s +7%
Honor Magicbook Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	540 (268^min - 550^max) MBit/s
Honor Magicbook Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	534 (263^min - 542^max) MBit/s -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	302 MBit/s -44%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng RealTek Semiconductor, Device ID: C821	281 MBit/s -48%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	243 MBit/s -55%
HP 14-ma0312ng Realtek RTL8723DE	98 MBit/s -82%

Honor Magicbook Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø539 (527-550)

Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000); iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø534 (527-542)

Honor Magicbook Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (602-654)

Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000); iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø642 (613-660)

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)


291 cd/m²	282 cd/m²	285 cd/m²
274 cd/m²	287 cd/m²	266 cd/m²
250 cd/m²	255 cd/m²	264 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BEO0764 (TV140FHM-NH0) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 272.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 287 cd/m²
Contrast: 1367:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
63.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
62.66% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.09% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)


324 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	318 cd/m²
305 cd/m²	318 cd/m²	299 cd/m²
291 cd/m²	306 cd/m²	292 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0764 (TV140FHM-NH0) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 307.8 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
63.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
65.31% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.23% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.07% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.59% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Honor Magicbook i5-8250U, BEO0764 (TV140FHM-NH0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Honor Magicbook R5 2500U, BOE0764 (TV140FHM-NH0), , 1920x1080, 14.00	HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, AU Optronics B140XTN07.2, TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00	Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL i5-8550U, AU Optronics B140HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng i5-8550U, BOE072C, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, LP140WF6 / LGD059D, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB i5-8550U, AUO B140QAN02.3, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00	HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, LGD04B2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Innolux N140HCA-EAC, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display		3%	-8%	-15%	-7%	-7%	51%	-7%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	43.09	44.59 3%	39.31 -9%	36.09 -16%	39.64 -8%	39.81 -8%	65.5 52%	39.56 -8%	41.88 -3%
sRGB Coverage	63.1	65.7 4%	59.2 -6%	54.2 -14%	59.3 -6%	59.6 -6%	96.2 52%	59.3 -6%	62.8 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	44.52	46.07 3%	40.61 -9%	37.28 -16%	40.96 -8%	41.16 -8%	66.1 48%	40.88 -8%	43.29 -3%
Response Times		-0%	31%	16%	5%	23%	-14%	11%	4115%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	44.4 ?(23.2, 21.2)	44.8 ?(22, 22.8) -1%	40 ?(21, 19) 10%	41 ?(19, 22) 8%	40 ?(21, 19) 10%	36.4 ?(18.8, 17.6) 18%	58.4 ?(29.2, 29.2) -32%	40 ?(21.2, 18.8) 10%	44 ?(22.8, 21.2) 1%
Response Time Black / White *	32.8 ?(18, 14.8)	32.8 ?(18.8, 14) -0%	16 ?(11, 5) 51%	25 ?(15, 10) 24%	31 ?(18, 13) 5%	24 ?(13.2, 10.8) 27%	31.2 ?(14.8, 16.4) 5%	28.8 ?(17.2, 11.6) 12%	31.2 ?(17.2, 14) 5%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(100)	200 ?(90) 0%			200 ?(90) 0%				24880 ?(40) 12340%
Screen		-4%	-99%	-19%	-15%	-14%	0%	-17%	-5%
Brightness middle	287	318 11%	240 -16%	233 -19%	239 -17%	250 -13%	311 8%	236 -18%	251 -13%
Brightness	273	308 13%	216 -21%	217 -21%	223 -18%	241 -12%	293 7%	221 -19%	231 -15%
Brightness Distribution	86	90 5%	84 -2%	88 2%	88 2%	81 -6%	85 -1%	88 2%	80 -7%
Black Level *	0.21	0.26 -24%	0.56 -167%	0.27 -29%	0.27 -29%	0.25 -19%	0.2 5%	0.26 -24%	0.19 10%
Contrast	1367	1223 -11%	429 -69%	863 -37%	885 -35%	1000 -27%	1555 14%	908 -34%	1321 -3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5	5.3 -6%	13.14 -163%	5.85 -17%	5.3 -6%	5.5 -10%	6 -20%	5.7 -14%	5.1 -2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	20.1	19.3 4%	21.06 -5%	11.51 43%	10.03 50%	23.5 -17%	11.6 42%	22 -9%	10.6 47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	4.5	4.2 7%	12.71 -182%		3.64 19%	4.8 -7%	1.6 64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	4 -48%	14.89 -451%	4.87 -80%	5.85 -117%	3.5 -30%	8.7 -222%	3.8 -41%	4.5 -67%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.62 ^84%	2.47 ^89%	2.45 ^90%	2.27 ^97%	2.19 ^100%	2.1 ^105%	2.18 ^101%
CCT	6653 ^98%	6991 ^93%	19625 ^33%	6908 ^94%	7169 ^91%	7049 ^92%	8426 ^77%	7318 ^89%	6146 ^106%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	40.59	42.23 4%	38 -6%	34 -16%	38 -6%	37.9 -7%	60.9 50%	37.7 -7%	39.8 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	62.66	65.31 4%	59 -6%	54 -14%	59 -6%	59.4 -5%	96 53%	59.2 -6%	62.5 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-0% / -2%	-25% / -66%	-6% / -13%	-6% / -10%	1% / -8%	12% / 8%	-4% / -11%	1369% / 768%

* ... smaller is better

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.2 ms rise
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 72 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Display Response Times

ℹ

↔ Response Time Black to White
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.8 ms rise
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Honor Magicbook Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø552 (547.12-598.25)

Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø521 (514.07-569.37)

Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø503 (499-539)

Dell Latitude 3490 Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø596 (586.36-637.92)

Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø481 (476.32-517.64)

HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø533 (470-601)

Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø519 (514.26-550.65)

HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø512 (505.84-527.4)

HP 14-ma0312ng Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø495 (491.26-514.13)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)	237 Points +63%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel Core i7-8550U	167 Points +15%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng Intel Core i7-8550U	166 Points +14%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Core i7-8550U	161 Points +11%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel Core i5-8250U	146 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points 0%
Honor Magicbook Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points -1%
HP 14-ma0312ng Intel Core i5-8250U	142 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97)	141.1 Points -3%
Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	138 Points -5%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)	1757 Points +194%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel Core i5-8250U	646 Points +8%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel Core i5-8250U	620 Points +4%
Honor Magicbook Intel Core i5-8250U	598 Points
Honor Magicbook AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	576 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101)	570 Points -5%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel Core i7-8550U	550 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Intel Core i5-8250U	548 Points -8%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng Intel Core i7-8550U	527 (505.84^min - 527.4^max) Points -12%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB Intel Core i7-8550U	518 Points -13%
HP 14-ma0312ng Intel Core i5-8250U	514 Points -14%

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

89.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

598 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

145 Points

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Subnotebook (4730 - 5285, n=3, last 2 years)	5030 Points +34%
Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2	4458 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i5-8250U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	4187 Points +12%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	3968 Points +6%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	3774 Points +1%
Honor Magicbook GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3741 Points
HP 14-ma0312ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD	3709 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3274 - 3935, n=10)	3687 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	3463 Points -7%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G	3379 Points -10%
Honor Magicbook Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3231 Points -14%

PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)	5879 Points +57%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), i5-8250U, Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	3954 Points +6%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	3805 Points +2%
Honor Magicbook GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	3740 Points
Dell Latitude 3490 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 M.2	3619 Points -3%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	3577 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3007 - 3904, n=10)	3542 Points -5%
HP 14-ma0312ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD	3447 Points -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	3421 Points -9%
Honor Magicbook Vega 8, R5 2500U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	2928 Points -22%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3741 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4852 points
PCMark 10 Score		3740 points
Help

	Honor Magicbook Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	Honor Magicbook Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ	HP 14-ma0312ng Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD	HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G	Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7	Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	Dell Latitude 3490 SK hynix SC311 M.2	HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA	Average Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		2%	97%	-12%		156%	4%	72%	110%	2%
Write 4K	82.1	76.5 -7%	88.2 7%	69.5 -15%		136.1 66%	71.7 -13%	135.3 65%	120.3 47%	78.1 ?(55.4 - 89.7, n=7) -5%
Read 4K	21.11	30.02 42%	166.4 688%	34.71 64%		44.52 111%	28.66 36%	34.35 63%	43.48 106%	26.8 ?(16.7 - 36.6, n=7) 27%
Write Seq	451.7	461.2 2%	158.4 -65%	382.1 -15%		1279 183%	415.9 -8%	601 33%	986 118%	439 ?(384 - 505, n=7) -3%
Read Seq	477.7	508 6%	895 87%	435.3 -9%		1665 249%	500 5%	1175 146%	1395 192%	479 ?(436 - 528, n=7) 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	242.2	212.3 -12%	162.1 -33%	158.1 -35%		327.5 35%	278 15%	377.6 56%	250 3%	244 ?(205 - 321, n=7) 1%
Read 4K Q32T1	257.4	239.7 -7%	496.8 93%	200.6 -22%		391.8 52%	252.9 -2%	288.3 12%	491.5 91%	245 ?(181.7 - 340, n=7) -5%
Write Seq Q32T1	526	482.7 -8%	159.9 -70%	205.4 -61%		1387 164%	502 -5%	591 12%	1047 99%	521 ?(483 - 534, n=7) -1%
Read Seq Q32T1	550	535 -3%	933 70%	541 -2%		2693 390%	553 1%	1574 186%	1781 224%	545 ?(535 - 551, n=7) -1%
AS SSD		-25%	-414%	-216%	59%	119%	-1%	28%	13%	-1%
Score Total	1114	759 -32%	588 -47%	570 -49%	1703 53%	2621 135%	1006 -10%	1264 13%	1200 8%	1017 ?(759 - 1114, n=7) -9%
Score Write	410	287 -30%	205 -50%	120 -71%	695 70%	1221 198%	387 -6%	634 55%	325 -21%	369 ?(284 - 423, n=7) -10%
Score Read	459	305 -34%	242 -47%	301 -34%	697 52%	965 110%	409 -11%	438 -5%	602 31%	425 ?(305 - 459, n=7) -7%
Access Time Write *	0.04	0.069 -73%	0.041 -3%	0.845 -2013%	0.031 22%	0.051 -28%	0.052 -30%	0.032 20%	0.138 -245%	0.05 ?(0.04 - 0.069, n=7) -25%
Access Time Read *	0.07	0.083 -19%	3.697 -5181%	0.394 -463%	0.07 -0%	0.051 27%	0.097 -39%	0.119 -70%	0.095 -36%	0.1037 ?(0.07 - 0.148, n=7) -48%
4K-64 Write	279.8	191.6 -32%	125.3 -55%	46.82 -83%	521 86%	1019 264%	286.1 2%	485 73%	164 -41%	260 ?(156.1 - 314, n=7) -7%
4K-64 Read	378.6	224.4 -41%	44.76 -88%	221.8 -41%	506 34%	690 82%	332.7 -12%	277.5 -27%	417.1 10%	352 ?(224 - 379, n=7) -7%
4K Write	84.5	50.9 -40%	66 -22%	62.6 -26%	117.5 39%	103.5 22%	68.9 -18%	106.5 26%	98 16%	70.6 ?(50.9 - 84.5, n=7) -16%
4K Read	32.46	31.78 -2%	111.7 244%	31.49 -3%	29.55 -9%	41.15 27%	27.67 -15%	31.9 -2%	32.07 -1%	26.8 ?(14.1 - 32.5, n=7) -17%
Seq Write	458.5	447.7 -2%	141.7 -69%	110.1 -76%	567 24%	982 114%	318.8 -30%	430 -6%	633 38%	393 ?(246 - 493, n=7) -14%
Seq Read	481.6	489.2 2%	852 77%	481.4 0%	1609 234%	2340 386%	484.7 1%	1282 166%	1531 218%	465 ?(433 - 513, n=7) -3%
Copy Game MB/s	259.6	236.4 -9%	55.6 -79%	111.5 -57%	421.5 62%	361.8 39%	306.2 18%	395.8 52%	96.2 -63%	324 ?(236 - 415, n=4) 25%
Copy Program MB/s	163.8	137.2 -16%	52 -68%	80.7 -51%	290.2 77%	332.8 103%	315.9 93%	229.6 40%	115.4 -30%	280 ?(137.2 - 614, n=4) 71%
Copy ISO MB/s	333	284.7 -15%		135.2 -59%	620 86%	961 189%	476.7 43%	522 57%	1321 297%	497 ?(285 - 816, n=4) 49%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -15%	-159% / -220%	-114% / -142%	59% / 59%	138% / 133%	2% / 1%	50% / 44%	62% / 48%	1% / -0%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 550 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 526 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 257.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 242.2 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 477.7 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 451.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 21.11 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 82.1 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)	8227 Points +83%
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	4690 Points +4%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	4494 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2796 - 4905, n=47)	4191 Points -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	3833 Points -15%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	3482 Points -23%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	2945 Points -34%
HP 14-ma0312ng Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1645 Points -63%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1634 Points -64%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1595 Points -65%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (13768 - 65911, n=39, last 2 years)	29386 Points +37%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	21461 Points
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	19698 Points -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16227 - 22183, n=43)	19512 Points -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	18946 Points -12%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	15109 Points -30%
HP 14-ma0312ng Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	9520 Points -56%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	7970 Points -63%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	7833 Points -64%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)	6026 Points +74%
HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	3561 Points +3%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	3459 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2323 - 3739, n=44)	3310 Points -4%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	2328 Points -33%
Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	2323 Points -33%
HP 14-ma0312ng Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	1160 Points -66%
Dell Latitude 3490 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	956 Points -72%
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	929 Points -73%

3DMark 2001SE Standard		34443 points
3DMark 11 Performance		4760 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		15124 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3154 points
Help

... in comparison

Fortnite | FIFA 19 | The Witcher 3

Fortnite
1280x720 Low Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	225 (174^min - 318^max) fps +99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (61.7 - 225, n=5)	138.6 fps +22%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	113.2 fps
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	66.1 fps -42%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	63.6 fps -44%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	61.7 fps -45%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	53.6 (38^min - 80^max) fps -53%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	41 fps -64%
HP 14-ma0312ng Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	39 fps -66%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	76 (69^min - 82^max) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (33.7 - 86.7, n=5)	61.6 fps +5%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	58.9 fps
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	33.7 fps -43%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	30.1 fps -49%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	22.4 (19^min - 25^max) fps -62%
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	19.9 fps -66%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	13.7 fps -77%
1920x1080 High Preset
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	36.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	32.4 (26^min - 38^max) fps -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (22.1 - 36.7, n=5)	32.2 fps -11%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	22.1 fps -39%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	19.1 fps -47%
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	14.1 fps -61%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	7.6 (4^min - 10^max) fps -79%
1920x1080 Epic Preset
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	24.1 fps
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	23.6 (22^min - 25^max) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16.2 - 25, n=5)	22.3 fps -7%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	16.2 fps -33%
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	11.5 fps -52%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	10.9 fps -55%

FIFA 19
1280x720 Low Preset
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	144.6 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (84.5 - 144.6, n=4)	127.2 fps -12%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	84.5 fps -42%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	74.7 fps -48%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	50.3 fps -65%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	48.4 (44^min - 52^max) fps -67%
MSI PL62 Intel HD Graphics 630, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	36.2 (32^min) fps -75%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (51.7 - 114.3, n=4)	81.3 fps +3%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	78.8 fps
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	51.7 fps -34%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	33.6 fps -57%
Fujitsu Lifebook A357-A3570MPH06DE Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	25.1 fps -68%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	23.2 (20^min - 25^max) fps -71%
MSI PL62 Intel HD Graphics 630, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	20.1 (18^min) fps -74%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:2x MS
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (44.9 - 108.2, n=4)	73.7 fps +5%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	70.5 fps
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	44.9 fps -36%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	30.9 fps -56%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	20.7 (18^min - 22^max) fps -71%
MSI PL62 Intel HD Graphics 630, Intel Core i7-7700HQ	14.6 (13^min) fps -79%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4x MS
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	70.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (43.2 - 97.2, n=5)	63.7 fps -9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	50.1 (41^min - 56^max) fps -29%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	43.2 fps -38%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	30.8 fps -56%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	17.8 (15^min - 20^max) fps -75%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (37 - 249, n=53, last 2 years)	102.1 fps +69%
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	66.8 fps +11%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	62.1 (52^min - 69^max) fps +3%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	60.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (42.6 - 72, n=24)	58.2 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8250U	53.8 fps -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8550U	42.7 fps -29%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	42.6 fps -29%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	37 fps -39%
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP AMD Radeon 530, Intel Core i7-8550U	32.8 fps -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U	29.5 fps -51%
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	27.2 fps -55%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15ARR 81D2005CUS AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	22 fps -64%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	17.2 fps -72%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (29 - 264, n=46, last 2 years)	63.7 fps +76%
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	39.6 fps +9%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	37.6 (30^min - 43^max) fps +4%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	36.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (24.4 - 43.2, n=26)	34.3 fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8250U	34.04 fps -6%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	25.6 fps -29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8550U	25 fps -31%
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP AMD Radeon 530, Intel Core i7-8550U	19.8 fps -45%
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	16.7 fps -54%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	10.7 fps -70%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years)	34.9 fps +76%
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	22.1 fps +12%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	19.9 (15^min - 24^max) fps +1%
Honor Magicbook NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i5-8250U	19.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (13.3 - 23.8, n=25)	19 fps -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Intel Core i5-8250U	17.34 fps -12%
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	14.2 fps -28%
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8550U	13.6 fps -31%
Honor Magicbook AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 2500U	13.1 fps -34%
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP AMD Radeon 530, Intel Core i7-8550U	11.1 fps -44%
Lenovo ThinkPad A485-20MU000CGE AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U	9.8 fps -51%
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	9 fps -55%
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8250U	6.5 fps -67%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years)	18.9 fps
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	11.8 fps
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	11.5 (9^min - 14^max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (6.5 - 17, n=25)	11.1 fps
Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	10.2 fps
HP Envy 13-ah0003ng NVIDIA GeForce MX150, Intel Core i7-8550U	9 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex-1570 81CA000RUS NVIDIA GeForce MX130, Intel Core i7-8550U	7.2 fps
Dell Latitude 15 3590-K8JP AMD Radeon 530, Intel Core i7-8550U	6.3 fps
HP 15-da0405ng NVIDIA GeForce MX110, Intel Core i5-8250U	5.3 fps

Fortnite | FIFA 19 | The Witcher 3

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
Trackmania Nations Forever (2008)			133	110
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)				80	55	30.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	60.4	36.2	19.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	103.6	95.6	68.4	60.2
Rocket League (2017)			59.8		42.5	20.8
Fortnite (2018)	113.2	58.9	36.1	24.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	36.9	17.4	10.9		6.68	2.52
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	57.6	47	42.1			20.6
World of Tanks enCore (2018)	299	70.6		26.4
Strange Brigade (2018)	75.3	26.8	20.9	16.1
FIFA 19 (2018)	144.6	78.8	70.5	70.2
Anno 1800 (2019)	55.5	24	14.5
Rage 2 (2019)	29.7	13.1
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	73.4	21.5	9.2	6.1
F1 2019 (2019)	84.9	36.2	30.4	23.9
Control (2019)	40	12.8	9.3
Borderlands 3 (2019)	41.5	18	11.5	8.4
FIFA 20 (2019)	124	78.6	76.4	63.7	48.2	25
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019)	35	21
GRID 2019 (2019)	60.3	24.1	15.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019)	40.9	21.9	14.7
Need for Speed Heat (2019)	39.7	19.8
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019)		26.7	19.8
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019)		14.4
Fall Guys (2020)		57.8	39.4		23
Hearthstone (2020)			58.2			40.5
Escape from Tarkov (2020)	65.9	23.5
Hunt Showdown (2020)	53.8	21.2	16.6
Doom Eternal (2020)	45.2	24	18.9	0
Gears Tactics (2020)	102	30.9	17.8	14.3
Valorant (2020)	121	99.8	99.9		65.6	32.5
F1 2020 (2020)	77.6	34.7	25.7	16.2
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	26	12
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020)	27.4	10.4
Serious Sam 4 (2020)	0 game wont start
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)	36.8	16.1
Star Wars Squadrons (2020)	103	47.4	37.7	21.7
FIFA 21 (2020)				56.1
Watch Dogs Legion (2020)	26.9	14.1	11.1
Dirt 5 (2020)	35.3	10.9
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)	15
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020)	32	14
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)	18.3	7.78
Hitman 3 (2021)	42				9 ()
Outriders (2021)	43.1	25	15.8	12.8	11.3
Resident Evil Village (2021)	23.8
Days Gone (2021)	32.1	19.1
F1 2021 (2021)	59.9	27.5	21.8
Deathloop (2021)	0 game wont start
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)		31.6			7.79	1.855
God of War (2022)		11.8			1.907
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022)	20	16	15	8	5
Dying Light 2 (2022)
GRID Legends (2022)	41.5
Elden Ring (2022)	23.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)		10.9	6.68
Elex 2 (2022)	16.7
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)	13.2
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	18.7
F1 22 (2022)		27.4	19.3
FIFA 23 (2022)		14.5	9.07	6.66

Emissions - Intel Magicbook Stays Quieter, AMD is Cooler

Noise Level

Idle		30.3 / 30.3 / 30 dB(A)
Load		40.4 / 43.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A)

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Max. Load

Idle


47.7 °C	52.3 °C	47.8 °C
45.1 °C	43.3 °C	40 °C
32.9 °C	31.9 °C	30.7 °C

Maximum: 52.3 °C
Average: 41.3 °C


56.1 °C	54.2 °C	50.5 °C
41.4 °C	45.4 °C	43.6 °C
34.5 °C	35.6 °C	35.8 °C

Maximum: 56.1 °C
Average: 44.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 57.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.3 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.1 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.9 °C / 91.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-4.6 °C / -8.3 F).

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Max. Load

Idle


44.4 °C	45.6 °C	42.3 °C
38.6 °C	39.3 °C	35.1 °C
31.3 °C	30.5 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 45.6 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


46.5 °C	47.6 °C	46.7 °C
36 °C	40.7 °C	41.1 °C
37.1 °C	34.5 °C	33.5 °C

Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 40.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Honor Magicbook audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Honor Magicbook audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Management - All Magicbooks have good Battery Life

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.6 Watt
Idle	3.9 / 7.3 / 8 Watt
Load	55.4 / 63.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.4 / 0.7 Watt
Idle	4.7 / 7.6 / 8.1 Watt
Load	38 / 51 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Honor Magicbook i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Honor Magicbook R5 2500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, , 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 M.2, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00	HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00	Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk X600 SD9SN8W-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel Optane 16 GB MEMPEK1J016GAH + HGST HTS541010B7E610 1 TB HDD, TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00	Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		6%	4%	12%	7%	4%	1%	-23%	27%	-9%	-12%
Idle Minimum *	3.9	4.7 -21%	4.1 -5%	3.2 18%	3.9 -0%	4.4 -13%	4.4 -13%	6.3 -62%	4.7 -21%	4.48 ?(2.2 - 11.6, n=45) -15%	4.9 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=61, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Average *	7.3	7.6 -4%	6.3 14%	5.5 25%	5.76 21%	7.1 3%	6.6 10%	8.4 -15%	6.3 14%	7.88 ?(5 - 13.8, n=45) -8%	8.36 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=61, last 2 years) -15%
Idle Maximum *	8	8.1 -1%	7.1 11%	8.1 -1%	7.14 11%	10.2 -28%	9.2 -15%	10.2 -28%	6.8 15%	9.76 ?(6.2 - 14.7, n=45) -22%	10.4 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=61, last 2 years) -30%
Load Average *	55.4	38 31%	54.8 1%	40.8 26%	50.8 8%	36.5 34%	61 -10%	59 -6%	15 73%	54.7 ?(33 - 75, n=44) 1%	45.9 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=60, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	45.6	39.6 13%	43.8 4%				40 12%
Load Maximum *	63.6	51 20%	66.4 -4%	68.1 -7%	65.8 -3%	48.7 23%	50 21%	66.3 -4%	30.4 52%	63.5 ?(40.4 - 89.2, n=45) -0%	66 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=61, last 2 years) -4%

* ... smaller is better

Furthermore, we took a look at the efficiency of the two solutions, which is to say how many frames per watt they are able to provide. The entire energy consumption test was performed with an external display (int. display off). At 3.4 watts per FPS, the 8250U and MX150 combination claimed first place, followed by the AMD configuration that reached 4.49 W/FPS. Requiring almost 6 watts per FPS, the system with the UHD Graphics 620 active came in last.

	2500U/Vega 8/ext. display	8250U/UHD 620/ext. display	8250U/MX150/ext. display
Frame rate	8 FPS	4 FPS	11 FPS
Energy consumption	35.9 W	23.9 W	37.4 W
Efficiency	4.49 W/FPS	5.98 W/FPS	3.40 W/FPS

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		29h 00min
WiFi Websurfing		10h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12h 9min

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		15h 9min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 52min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 57min

	Honor Magicbook i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 56 Wh	Honor Magicbook R5 2500U, Vega 8, Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 48 Wh	Dell Latitude 3490 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 530s-14IKB i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 45 Wh	HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh	Acer Swift 3 SF314-52G-89SL i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh	HP Pavilion 14-ce0002ng i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 41 Wh	HP 14-ma0312ng i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41.7 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		-32%	-34%	13%	-35%	-51%	-24%	-46%	-39%	-5%
Reader / Idle	1740	909 -48%	1164 -33%		881 -49%	821 -53%		797 -54%	937 -46%	1252 ?(581 - 2550, n=9, last 2 years) -28%
H.264	729	477 -35%	536 -26%		428 -41%	224 -69%		350 -52%	399 -45%	794 ?(426 - 1153, n=30, last 2 years) 9%
WiFi v1.3	613	532 -13%	341 -44%	694 13%	520 -15%	416 -32%	465 -24%	414 -32%	445 -27%	629 ?(303 - 1144, n=63, last 2 years) 3%
Load			88		85	185		145	150	115.4 ?(61 - 197, n=47, last 2 years)

结论-配备AMD APU的荣耀Magicbook给我们带来了惊喜：

Pros

+ 小巧的高品质机身

+ Type-C接口

+ 优秀的Wi-Fi性能

+ 优秀的输入设备

+ 屏幕亮度高，对比度良好

+ AMD和英特尔版都有较好的CPU性能

+ 办公使用下通常都很安静（AMD版有时风扇会响）

+ 续航出色（英特尔版尤为优秀）

+ AMD版本性价比诱人

Cons

- 细小的做工缺陷

- 唯一可用的TypeC接口需要用于充电

- 屏幕色域低

- 两台设备都监测到了PWM调光

- 高负荷状态下温度较高（英特尔版本尤为明显）

Review: Honor MagicBook with Intel i5 and Ryzen 5 2500U processor

结论-配备AMD APU的荣耀Magicbook给我们带来了惊喜：

荣耀Magicbook是一台小巧紧凑的14英寸笔记本电脑，它的定位在办公本和多媒体笔记本之间。3999-4999元的售价使得它非常具有性价比。

虽然全金属外壳有着高品质的外观，但它也有一些小的做工缺陷。与竞争产品相比，荣耀Magicbook更薄更轻，而在接口方面，Type-C的存在值得一提，同时这个接口还支持充电。Magicbook在我们的Wi-Fi测试中同样表现不俗。

笔记本的触摸板和键盘还不错，尽管有些用户可能不太习惯QWERTY布局。

屏幕亮度高达300cd，对比度也非常合适，但是，因为屏幕的色域较差（约65%sRGB覆盖）我们不建议用它来进行专业的图像编辑任务。在测试中，我们还发现了一个有趣的细节，我们在英特尔型号上监测到了PWM调光，但在AMD型号上，只有90%亮度以下才能监测到。

“在性价比方面，AMD版本是绝对的赢家”

在CPU性能方面， i5版本仅比AMD版本高出5%。GPU方面，在有需要3D工作的任务中，英特尔/英伟达的组合要明显优于AMD，但后者只配备了Vega 8的集成显卡。尽管如此，Vega 8集成显卡的性能还是要远优于英特尔的UHD 620集成显卡，但它在高分辨率和高细节下的游戏表现仍然十分有限。

两种型号在办公使用时都很安静，尽管AMD版本的风扇偶尔会在轻负载情况下发出声音。但就温度而言，AMD版本在负载时温度只会微微升高，而英特尔/英伟达的配置在负载下温度会变得很高。

最后值得一提的是，Magicbook的AMD版本在我们的拟真Wi-Fi续航测试中达到了9小时，这是一个很好的成绩。不过英特尔版本的使用时间比AMD版还要多上一个小时，并且无论哪种电池测试都表明英特尔版本有着更好的续航。

我们的结论相当直截了当：价格敏感型用户，尤其是日常主要是办公使用的，应该选择AMD版本的 Magicbook，3999元的售价，你能得到很多，即使必须在一些地方做出妥协。而英特尔配合英伟达独显的配置更适合那些有多媒体娱乐和游戏需求的用户。不过，英特尔的型号售价要高出不少（1000元左右），AMD版本在性价比方面具有明显的优势。

Honor Magicbook (8250U)

Honor Magicbook - 2020-11-06 11/06/2020 v6^(old)
J. Simon Leitner

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

49 / 80 → 61%

Weight

70 / 35-78 → 81%

Battery

93%

Display

87%

Games Performance

76 / 68 → 100%

Application Performance

90 / 87 → 100%

Temperature

85 / 91 → 93%

Noise

87%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Average

79%

86%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Honor Magicbook (2500U)

Honor Magicbook - 2018-10-24 10/24/2018 v6^(old)
J. Simon Leitner

Chassis

82 / 98 → 83%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

47 / 80 → 58%

Weight

70 / 35-78 → 81%

Battery

90%

Display

87%

Games Performance

69 / 68 → 100%

Application Performance

85 / 87 → 97%

Temperature

88 / 91 → 97%

Noise

88%

Audio

64 / 91 → 70%

Average

78%

86%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 387730 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 荣耀Magicbook （英特尔 i5-8250U版对比 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U版）笔记本电脑评测

J. Simon Leitner, 2018-11-22 (Update: 2018-11-22)

荣耀Magicbook （英特尔 i5-8250U版 对比 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U版）笔记本电脑评测

Size Comparison

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Emissions - Intel Magicbook Stays Quieter, AMD is Cooler

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Honor Magicbook audio analysis

Honor Magicbook audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Xiaomi Mi Notebook 15.6 (E58514D1D) audio analysis

Power Management - All Magicbooks have good Battery Life

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

Magicbook (Intel i5-8250U)

Magicbook (AMD 2500U)

结论-配备AMD APU的荣耀Magicbook给我们带来了惊喜：

Pros

Cons

Honor Magicbook (8250U)

Honor Magicbook (2500U)

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare

荣耀Magicbook （英特尔 i5-8250U版对比 AMD Ryzen 5 2500U版）笔记本电脑评测