Huawei P9 Lite
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix LED 闪光灯, f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 34 scores (from 58 reviews)
Reviews for the Huawei P9 Lite
产品维护。 华为为它的P9系列增添了一台经典设计中端智能手机P9。这台5.2寸安卓设备在测试中展现了足以继承销量冠军P8 Lite的潜力。
Source: Toptenreviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionA sleek and capable budget phone, let down by a lacklustre camera and poor battery life
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Review Zat
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Laptop Media
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIn a time when the market for wearable tech is ever growing, one’s ownership of a smart bracelet or watch is becoming a more common thing. However, the price is what draws away many users and they ask the fair question of whether the features of these devices are worth the investment. With the new offer combining a smartphone and a smart bracelet, Huawei is trying to make us think twice. The company has put together the stylish and powerful Huawei P9 lite and the smart bracelet.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/18/2016
Source: GSM Arena
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe "diet" label usually comes with a warning: "does not replace an exercise routine." In similar fashion, the Huawei P9 lite has to do the work, it just can't cut back on the sugar and call it a day. And it does deliver. It has a sweet display, the build quality, chipset and battery life proved quite tasty as well. The camera is good if not great while the software is an acquired taste, which some of you may already have.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2016
Source: Pocket Lint
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSo while it might be a low calorie take on the P9, sometimes the skimmed option does everything that you want: which is exactly the point of the P9 Lite. Fair price, fair performance and more than fair design lead the way here, the big difference being the shedding of those dual Leica cameras to the rear.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/03/1999
Source: Chinahandys.net
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/23/2017
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% price: 87% performance: 80% features: 80% display: 100% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android TV
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 11/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% mobility: 77%
Source: Ocaholic.ch
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Technik Surfer
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 80% performance: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Cyberbloc
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/05/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 90% performance: 93% features: 64% display: 91% mobility: 64%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/22/2016
Source: eTest
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/14/2016
Source: Smart Web
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 89% display: 82%
Source: Connect - Heft 8/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Technik Surfer - Heft 08/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: MobiFlip
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Computerbild - Heft 12/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/15/2016
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Ubergismo Deutsch
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android TV
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 100% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Allround-PC.com
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2016
Source: Connect - Heft 7/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: SFT - Heft 7/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 93%
Source: Android TV
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 100% performance: 80% display: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Inside Handy
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/30/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: A1 Blog
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/17/2016
Source: PC Welt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 93% performance: 92% features: 96% display: 93% mobility: 98%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 90% display: 95% mobility: 90% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Teltarif
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 95% features: 93% workmanship: 95% ergonomy: 93%
Source: n-tv
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/12/2016
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 82% display: 88% mobility: 83%
Source: Android Pit
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2016
Source: Kelisto.es
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Techné
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/30/2016
Source: Wintech
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 80% features: 80%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/04/2016
Source: Ridble
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/02/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2017
Source: Pianeta Cellulare
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2017
Source: Tutto App Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/03/2017
Source: Tutto App Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/17/2016
Source: AndroidPit.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recensione.biz
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Komputerswiat
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/15/2018
Source: Teleguru
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 50%
Source: Komorkomania
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/13/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: PurePC
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/13/2016
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 60% features: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 30%
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/25/2016
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Yamobi
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2016
Source: Geeks.hu
HU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2016
Source: CNews.cz
CZ→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2017
Source: Computerblog.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/29/2016
Comment
ARM Mali-T830 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Kirin 650: 麒麟650
基于ARM的八核处理器(8个Cortex-A53核心)。四个频率最高可达1.7 GHz的节能核心和四个频率最高可达2 GHz的高性能核心。这颗处理器还集成了Mali-T830 MP2显卡和LTE模组。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.