Huawei P Smart 2020智能手机评测：顺手但过时

Name: Huawei P Smart 2020
Brand: Huawei

新瓶装老酒？ Huawei P Smart 2020带有Google服务，外观与之前的产品非常相似。尽管它获得了一些新的颜色并增加了一些存储空间，但一些小的改动是否足以使这台中端的智能手机保持竞争力？

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), Published 07/11/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Huawei Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei P Smart 2020 (P Series)

Processor

HiSilicon Kirin 710 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A73/-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G51 MP4

Memory

4 GB

Display

6.21 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 415 PPI, 电容, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB

, 116 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm音频端口, Card Reader: microSD（最高512 GB，FAT，FAT32，exFAT）, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: 加速度传感器，接近传感器，指南针

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B3/B7/B8/B20), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 155.3 x 73.5

Battery

3400 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix f/1.8, phase comparison AF, LED flash, videos @1080p/30fps (camera 1); 2.0MP, depth sharpness (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0

Additional features

Speakers: 单扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 是，USB充电器，MicroUSB电缆，SIM工具, 24 Months Warranty, LTE Cat 6 (300Mbps/50Mbps); FM radio; notification LED (multi-colored), fanless

Weight

163 g, Power Supply: 62 g

Price

199 Euro

Links

Huawei homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison Devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
76.6 %	07/2020	Huawei P Smart 2020 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	163 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.21"	2340x1080
75.7 %	07/2020	Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610	185 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.55"	1600x720
80.7 %	06/2020	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618	209 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
76.6 %	06/2020	Motorola Moto G8 SD 665, Adreno 610	188 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.40"	1560x720
84.9 %	01/2019	Huawei P Smart 2019 Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4	160 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	6.20"	2340x1080

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	256 (247^min - 263^max) MBit/s +21%
Huawei P Smart 2019 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	226 (197^min - 262^max) MBit/s +7%
Huawei P Smart 2020 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	211 (175^min - 242^max) MBit/s
Nokia 5.3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	163 (25^min - 258^max) MBit/s -23%
Motorola Moto G8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	55.8 (40^min - 67^max) MBit/s -74%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	376 MBit/s +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Adreno 618, SD 720G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	286 (225^min - 321^max) MBit/s +43%
Huawei P Smart 2020 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash	200 (126^min - 252^max) MBit/s
Huawei P Smart 2019 Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 64 GB eMMC Flash	164 (28^min - 206^max) MBit/s -18%
Nokia 5.3 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	145 (20^min - 215^max) MBit/s -27%
Motorola Moto G8 Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash	54.4 (38^min - 57^max) MBit/s -73%

Huawei P Smart 2020; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø200 (126-252)

Huawei P Smart 2020; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø211 (175-242)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2020

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2020

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Huawei P Smart 2020

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 8T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Huawei P Smart 2020: 5.59 ∆E min: 1.33 - max: 10.35 ∆E


423 cd/m²	427 cd/m²	427 cd/m²
440 cd/m²	446 cd/m²	443 cd/m²
484 cd/m²	472 cd/m²	474 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 484 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 448.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.166 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 446 cd/m²
Contrast: 875:1 (Black: 0.51 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.43

	Huawei P Smart 2020 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.21	Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.55	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67	Motorola Moto G8 IPS, 1560x720, 6.40	Huawei P Smart 2019 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.20
Screen		1%	22%	35%	34%
Brightness middle	446	523 17%	622 39%	504 13%	458 3%
Brightness	448	482 8%	612 37%	452 1%	440 -2%
Brightness Distribution	87	86 -1%	94 8%	83 -5%	85 -2%
Black Level *	0.51	0.46 10%	0.56 -10%	0.28 45%	0.35 31%
Contrast	875	1137 30%	1111 27%	1800 106%	1309 50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.22	6.22 -19%	3.98 24%	3.84 26%	1.4 73%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.66	10.56 -22%	7.33 15%	6.1 30%	3.8 56%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.8	8 -18%	4.5 34%	2.7 60%	2.4 65%
Gamma	2.43 ^91%	2.226 ^99%	2.206 ^100%	2.235 ^98%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	7956 ^82%	8856 ^73%	7361 ^88%	7125 ^91%	6235 ^104%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			114.9

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

344 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 344 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 344 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 25 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

3DMark | VRMark | Geekbench 4.4 | BaseMark OS II

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	16976 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24065 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	38671 Points +128%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24745 Points +46%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	16754 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (12120 - 22168, n=12)	19147 Points +13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	19251 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	15403 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	52700 Points +174%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24828 Points +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	19510 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2177 - 22605, n=12)	18746 Points -3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	12009 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	20320 Points +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	20019 Points +67%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	24457 Points +104%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	11212 Points -7%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (11158 - 22668, n=12)	16572 Points +38%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1124 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1795 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3501 Points +211%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1758 Points +56%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	812 Points -28%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (673 - 1503, n=15)	1218 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (712 - 7285, n=50, last 2 years)	3766 Points +235%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	979 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1663 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3647 Points +273%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1632 Points +67%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	683 Points -30%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (568 - 1355, n=15)	1072 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone (618 - 9451, n=50, last 2 years)	4186 Points +328%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2328 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2482 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3070 Points +32%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2405 Points +3%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2381 Points +2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1907 - 2654, n=15)	2422 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4525, n=50, last 2 years)	3082 Points +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1385 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1810 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3669 Points +165%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1783 Points +29%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1379 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (844 - 1534, n=15)	1395 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (704 - 23024, n=114, last 2 years)	9351 Points +575%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1251 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1692 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3803 Points +204%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1669 Points +33%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1225 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (740 - 1378, n=15)	1250 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (607 - 45492, n=113, last 2 years)	16352 Points +1207%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2221 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2396 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3267 Points +47%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2347 Points +6%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2459 Points +11%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1656 - 2723, n=15)	2358 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=113, last 2 years)	4426 Points +99%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	859 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1152 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2507 Points +192%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1093 Points +27%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	834 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (550 - 1002, n=15)	891 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 7890, n=105, last 2 years)	2755 Points +221%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	728 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	999 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2369 Points +225%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	945 Points +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	703 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (457 - 857, n=15)	755 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 9814, n=105, last 2 years)	2751 Points +278%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2325 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2476 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3152 Points +36%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2409 Points +4%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2392 Points +3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1924 - 2716, n=15)	2429 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 4679, n=105, last 2 years)	3163 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	967 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1148 Points +19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2680 Points +177%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1138 Points +18%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	966 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (563 - 1351, n=15)	965 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=182, last 2 years)	6737 Points +597%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	831 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	999 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2551 Points +207%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	990 Points +19%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	838 Points +1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (470 - 1194, n=15)	831 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=181, last 2 years)	9723 Points +1070%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2257 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2409 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3256 Points +44%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2379 Points +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2085 Points -8%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1851 - 2789, n=15)	2350 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (938 - 8480, n=181, last 2 years)	4224 Points +87%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	940 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1140 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2353 Points +150%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1052 Points +12%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (927 - 1365, n=6)	1061 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6439, n=99, last 2 years)	2671 Points +184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	803 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	995 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2257 Points +181%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	914 Points +14%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (796 - 1220, n=6)	924 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=99, last 2 years)	2850 Points +255%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2329 Points
Nokia 5.3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2321 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2765 Points +19%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2240 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2196 - 2345, n=6)	2293 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 3525, n=99, last 2 years)	2675 Points +15%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1146 Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2416 Score +111%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (961 - 1146, n=3)	1047 Score -9%
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=12, last 2 years)	5985 Score +422%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1550 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	2620 Points +69%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1495 Points -4%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1527 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1523 - 1614, n=11)	1560 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (934 - 9574, n=91, last 2 years)	5228 Points +237%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5430 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6263 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	5134 Points -5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5407 Points 0%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (5266 - 5615, n=11)	5454 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 26990, n=91, last 2 years)	14045 Points +159%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3256 Points
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	3157 Points -3%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2631 - 4083, n=11)	3514 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2053 - 18432, n=72, last 2 years)	10872 Points +234%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	2208 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3542 Points +60%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2318 Points +5%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2159 Points -2%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2140 - 2445, n=13)	2255 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)	5759 Points +161%
System (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	5132 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	6828 Points +33%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	4391 Points -14%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	5074 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (4826 - 5568, n=13)	5208 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)	9672 Points +88%
Memory (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	3098 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	4295 Points +39%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	2780 Points -10%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	2972 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (2823 - 4360, n=13)	3181 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)	6267 Points +102%
Graphics (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1488 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	3807 Points +156%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1932 Points +30%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	1469 Points -1%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (1450 - 1489, n=13)	1470 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)	14220 Points +856%
Web (sort by value)
Huawei P Smart 2020 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096	1021 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 6144	1410 Points +38%
Motorola Moto G8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096	1224 Points +20%
Huawei P Smart 2019 HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 3072	982 Points -4%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (982 - 1212, n=13)	1092 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)	1495 Points +46%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)	106.1 Points +245%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	48.53 Points +58%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30 - 33, n=8)	31.5 Points +2%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	30.78 Points
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	29.12 Points -5%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (last 2 years)	104.3 Points +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	89.5 Points +78%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	50.3 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (47 - 55.1, n=10)	50.2 Points 0%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	49.67 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	33.38 Points -34%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)	107.1 runs/min +252%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chome 81)	44.1 runs/min +45%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (30.4 - 33.9, n=6)	31.9 runs/min +5%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chome 81)	30.4 runs/min
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81)	25.4 runs/min -16%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)	133.1 Points +114%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	69 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	69 Points +11%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	62.1 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (52 - 69, n=11)	61.7 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	38 Points -39%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)	33503 Points +245%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	17303 Points +78%
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	9708 Points 0%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	9699 Points
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (9041 - 10544, n=13)	9659 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	6133 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81)	6719 ms * -68%
Average HiSilicon Kirin 710 (3999 - 4853, n=13)	4223 ms * -6%
Huawei P Smart 2020 (Chrome 81)	4000 ms *
Huawei P Smart 2019 (Chrome 70)	3999 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S (Chrome 81)	2794 ms * +30%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)	1595 ms * +60%

* ... smaller is better

	Huawei P Smart 2020	Nokia 5.3	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S	Motorola Moto G8	Huawei P Smart 2019	Average 128 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		31%	70%	27%	7%	16%	461%
Sequential Read 256KB	282.1	299.5 6%	496.6 76%	301 7%	288.3 2%	283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=74) 0%	1508 ?(226 - 4512, n=218, last 2 years) 435%
Sequential Write 256KB	168.3	243.2 45%	214.8 28%	239 42%	191.4 14%	193 ?(72.3 - 314, n=74) 15%	1118 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=218, last 2 years) 564%
Random Read 4KB	41.2	109.1 165%	137 233%	57.3 39%	45.66 11%	82.4 ?(8.63 - 247, n=74) 100%	247 ?(22.2 - 543, n=218, last 2 years) 500%
Random Write 4KB	61.1	45.2 -26%	123.6 102%	128.1 110%	70.7 16%	54 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=74) -12%	272 ?(13 - 709, n=218, last 2 years) 345%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	76.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	74.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -2%	68.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -10%	76.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	78.1 ?(29.2 - 153.8, n=34) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	67 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -9%	54.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -18%	48.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -27%	66.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	61.8 ?(26.1 - 81.9, n=34) -8%

Huawei P Smart 2020; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.18.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Huawei P Smart 2020; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.18.0: Ø29.7 (24-32)

Huawei P Smart 2020; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.2.2a: Ø29 (19-31)

Huawei P Smart 2020; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.2.2a: Ø29.2 (19-31)

Max. Load

Idle


43.8 °C	40.2 °C	38.4 °C
44.3 °C	40 °C	39.3 °C
43.4 °C	40.3 °C	38.7 °C

Maximum: 44.3 °C
Average: 40.9 °C


38.8 °C	40.3 °C	43.5 °C
38.7 °C	40.6 °C	45.3 °C
38.5 °C	40.6 °C	44.7 °C

Maximum: 45.3 °C
Average: 41.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41 °C | Room Temperature 21.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei P Smart 2020 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	1 / 2.1 / 2.5 Watt
Load	4.3 / 7.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Huawei P Smart 2020 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh	Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh	Average HiSilicon Kirin 710	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-14%	-5%	4%	-4%	7%
Idle Minimum *	1	1.5 -50%	1.3 -30%	0.84 16%	1.058 ?(0.8 - 2.3, n=13) -6%	0.897 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=162, last 2 years) 10%
Idle Average *	2.1	2.1 -0%	2 5%	2.21 -5%	2.2 ?(1.2 - 3, n=13) -5%	1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=162, last 2 years) 31%
Idle Maximum *	2.5	2.5 -0%	2.8 -12%	2.23 11%	2.57 ?(2.2 - 4.2, n=13) -3%	1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=162, last 2 years) 35%
Load Average *	4.3	5.2 -21%	3.9 9%	4.2 2%	4.61 ?(4.06 - 6, n=13) -7%	5.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=162, last 2 years) -29%
Load Maximum *	7.5	7.5 -0%	7.2 4%	7.86 -5%	7.6 ?(6.13 - 9.4, n=13) -1%	8.31 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=162, last 2 years) -11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		22h 05min
WiFi Websurfing		8h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 24min

	Huawei P Smart 2020 3400 mAh	Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh	Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh	Huawei P Smart 2019 3400 mAh
Battery Runtime		67%	91%	64%	-3%
Reader / Idle	1325		2263 71%	1953 47%	1293 -2%
H.264	489		1269 160%	1048 114%	464 -5%
WiFi v1.3	523	876 67%	1187 127%	988 89%	506 -3%
Load	264		279 6%	276 5%	257 -3%

Pros

+ 舒适轻巧

+ 不错的语音质量

+ 扬声器

+ 快速WLAN

+ 大存储

Cons

- Android 9和过时的安全补丁

- LTE频率少

- 只能用一个镜头拍照

- 显示屏不够亮

- 高发热

- 一些应用程序的问题

- 续航时间相对较短

- 低亮度PWM

总结——加量也加价

In review: Huawei P Smart 2020. Test unit provided by Huawei Germany.

华为的P Smart系列很受欢迎。这是可以理解的，因为到目前为止该系列提供了很多性价比。这也使P Smart 2020仍可以感觉到跟得上时代，即使与以前的版本相比变化不大。

但是，已经出现了老化的最初迹象：尽管相机仍然可以拍摄出清晰的照片，但是它却缺乏变焦功能，这是目前价格范围内的许多设备所提供的。您也找不到诸如USB-C端口，VoLTE或具有更多频段的更快LTE之类的现代功能。2020年推出的智能手机还搭载Android 9，还不清楚会不会有Android 10，这也值得三思。

根据用户的不同，小电池可能是好处或者坏处。那些想摆脱对智能手机的日常充电的人不会喜欢，除非是轻度使用。另一方面，小巧的电池可加快充电速度并减轻重量。

对于那些喜欢纤薄轻巧的手机人，我们仍然可以推荐华为P Smart 2020。但是那些重视电池续航时间和现代软件的人应该考虑其他型号。

定位相当准确，WLAN相当快，性能合适，并且128 GB的存储对于智能手机也是一个有点。

但是，华为P Smart 2020还存在另一个问题：它和P Smart 2019基本上是同一款智能手机，但存储空间略少，价格更少。因此，如果您要省钱，则可能要购买19款。尽管从中端机型来看，后继产品仍然是一款不错的智能手机，但在该价格范围内，它的感觉已不再像其他机型那样跟得上时代。

Huawei P Smart 2020 - 2020-05-30 05/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

77%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

42 / 70 → 60%

Weight

91%

Battery

79%

Display

83%

Games Performance

30 / 64 → 47%

Application Performance

56 / 86 → 65%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

60 / 90 → 67%

Camera

55%

Average

71%

77%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 510 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389263 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Huawei P Smart 2020智能手机评测：顺手但过时

Florian Schmitt, 2020-07-11 (Update: 2020-07-11)

Huawei P Smart 2020智能手机评测：顺手但过时

Comparison Devices

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Huawei P Smart 2020 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis

Pros

Cons

总结——加量也加价

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare