Notebookcheck

Apple iPad mini 5 平板电脑评测

Mike Wobker, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen), 06/23/2019
Apple Tablet iOS Touchscreen

Great size. 第五代iPad mini结合了我们熟知的外观设计和现代硬件。 除了采用True Tone技术的Retina显示屏外,它还支持Apple Pencil。了解这个最新的iPad mini还有哪些你可以期待的东西以及那些还没有改进的部分。

Apple iPad Mini 5 (iPad Mini Series)
Processor
Apple A12 Bionic
Graphics adapter
Apple A12 Bionic GPU
Memory
3072 MB 
Display
7.9 inch 4:3, 2048 x 1536 pixel 324 PPI, 电容式触摸屏, IPS, DCI-P3色彩空间,真彩显示,防油涂层,完全层压,1.8%反射, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 55 GB free
Connections
Audio Connections: 组合耳机和麦克风插孔(3.5毫米音频端口), 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 3轴陀螺仪,加速度传感器,气压计,Lightning接口
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.1 x 203.2 x 134.8
Battery
19.1 Wh, 5124 mAh Lithium-Polymer, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Operating System
Apple iOS 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix (HDR,自动对焦,f / 2.4,全高清视频)
Secondary Camera: 7 MPix (HDR,固定焦距,f / 2.2,全高清视频)
Additional features
Speakers: 双扬声器, Keyboard: 屏幕虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, USB线,贴纸,快速入门说明书,安全信息, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
300 g, Power Supply: 97 g
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019
Apple iPad Mini 5 2019

Size Comparison

249 mm 164 mm 7 mm 482 g212.6 mm 124.8 mm 7.3 mm 316 g203.2 mm 134.8 mm 6.1 mm 300 g203.2 mm 134.8 mm 6.1 mm 304 g200.2 mm 120.3 mm 7.9 mm 342.5 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
446 MBit/s ∼100% +89%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
290 MBit/s ∼65% +23%
Apple iPad Mini 5
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
236 MBit/s ∼53%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
203 MBit/s ∼46% -14%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Adreno 540, 835, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
580 MBit/s ∼100% +199%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
Adreno 512, 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash
450 MBit/s ∼78% +132%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 32 GB eMMC Flash
205 MBit/s ∼35% +6%
Apple iPad Mini 5
A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash
194 (min: 119, max: 263) MBit/s ∼33%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10: Ø236 (215-247)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø194 (119-263)
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini
Positioning - Apple iPad mini

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Apple iPad Mini 5 - test chart
Apple iPad Mini 5 - test chart (details)
481
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
469
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 533 cd/m² Average: 494.6 cd/m² Minimum: 7.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 858:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.88 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.183
Apple iPad Mini 5
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Apple iPad Mini 4
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
IPS LCD, 1920x1200, 8
Screen
-40%
-69%
-176%
-138%
Brightness middle
515
411
-20%
474
-8%
405
-21%
454
-12%
Brightness
495
421
-15%
477
-4%
392
-21%
411
-17%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
91
5%
92
6%
83
-5%
Black Level *
0.6
0.58
3%
0.67
-12%
0.73
-22%
Contrast
858
709
-17%
604
-30%
622
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
0.88
2.15
-144%
2.5
-184%
5.78
-557%
5.2
-491%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.15
5.8
-170%
9.82
-357%
8.36
-289%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.4
2.72
-94%
2.1
-50%
7.2
-414%
4.7
-236%
Gamma
2.183 101%
2.29 96%
2.08 106%
2.278 97%
2.271 97%
CCT
6944 94%
7012 93%
6281 103%
8405 77%
7361 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 5556 Hz ≤ 25 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 5556 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 25 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 5556 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9447 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (25.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.2 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple iPad Mini 5
11480 Points ∼32%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11244 - 11598, n=5)
11418 Points ∼32% -1%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
6509 Points ∼18% -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6477 Points ∼18% -44%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
5860 Points ∼16% -49%
Average of class Tablet (1106 - 18041, n=55)
4639 Points ∼13% -60%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple iPad Mini 5
4788 Points ∼76%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4750 - 4824, n=5)
4779 Points ∼75% 0%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1896 Points ∼30% -60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1893 Points ∼30% -60%
Average of class Tablet (429 - 5002, n=55)
1653 Points ∼26% -65%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1642 Points ∼26% -66%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Mini 5
3204 Points ∼71%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2723 - 3347, n=5)
3060 Points ∼67% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2919 Points ∼64% -9%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2797 Points ∼62% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2552 Points ∼56% -20%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3347, n=43)
1600 Points ∼35% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
5703 Points ∼69%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4828 - 6484, n=5)
5443 Points ∼66% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
4086 Points ∼50% -28%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1910 Points ∼23% -67%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 6993, n=43)
1631 Points ∼20% -71%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1267 Points ∼15% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Apple iPad Mini 5
4861 Points ∼77%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4121 - 5367, n=5)
4638 Points ∼73% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼59% -23%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2023 Points ∼32% -58%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1442 Points ∼23% -70%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5367, n=44)
1397 Points ∼22% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad Mini 5
3361 Points ∼71%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2880 - 3493, n=5)
3129 Points ∼67% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼63% -12%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2758 Points ∼59% -18%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2268 Points ∼48% -33%
Average of class Tablet (739 - 4700, n=48)
1643 Points ∼35% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
14040 Points ∼49%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (10374 - 15399, n=5)
13770 Points ∼48% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼13% -74%
Average of class Tablet (165 - 28751, n=48)
3099 Points ∼11% -78%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2461 Points ∼9% -82%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2033 Points ∼7% -86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Apple iPad Mini 5
8230 Points ∼61%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (6667 - 8763, n=5)
7814 Points ∼58% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3753 Points ∼28% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2415 Points ∼18% -71%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2148 Points ∼16% -74%
Average of class Tablet (207 - 13454, n=48)
2050 Points ∼15% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Apple iPad Mini 5
3152 Points ∼73%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2960 - 3312, n=5)
3114 Points ∼72% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼68% -6%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2700 Points ∼63% -14%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2653 Points ∼61% -16%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 3312, n=62)
1474 Points ∼34% -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
4940 Points ∼78%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3712 - 5760, n=5)
4389 Points ∼69% -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼58% -25%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1778 Points ∼28% -64%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1195 Points ∼19% -76%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 5760, n=62)
1193 Points ∼19% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad Mini 5
4388 Points ∼77%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (3514 - 4949, n=5)
4005 Points ∼70% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼61% -20%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1919 Points ∼33% -56%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1364 Points ∼24% -69%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 4949, n=68)
1052 Points ∼18% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Apple iPad Mini 5
3184 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2952 Points ∼66% -7%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2780 Points ∼62% -13%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2555 Points ∼57% -20%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2713 - 3184, n=5)
2407 Points ∼54% -24%
Average of class Tablet (793 - 3184, n=64)
1443 Points ∼32% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad Mini 5
9966 Points ∼94%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (7055 - 10647, n=5)
7095 Points ∼67% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3682 Points ∼35% -63%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2501 Points ∼23% -75%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1936 Points ∼18% -81%
Average of class Tablet (42 - 10647, n=64)
1731 Points ∼16% -83%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad Mini 5
6765 Points ∼87%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (5205 - 6997, n=5)
4938 Points ∼63% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3490 Points ∼45% -48%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2513 Points ∼32% -63%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2071 Points ∼26% -69%
Average of class Tablet (53 - 6997, n=68)
1359 Points ∼17% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Average Apple A12 Bionic (27400 - 27717, n=5)
27548 Points ∼32% 0%
Apple iPad Mini 5
27547 Points ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
20173 Points ∼23% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
19037 Points ∼22% -31%
Average of class Tablet (3675 - 51374, n=152)
13331 Points ∼15% -52%
Apple iPad Mini 4
9844 Points ∼11% -64%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Average Apple A12 Bionic (159735 - 162695, n=5)
160619 Points ∼30% 0%
Apple iPad Mini 5
160066 Points ∼30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
56368 Points ∼11% -65%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
29422 Points ∼6% -82%
Apple iPad Mini 4
25254 Points ∼5% -84%
Average of class Tablet (2109 - 194856, n=152)
20201 Points ∼4% -87%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Average Apple A12 Bionic (77128 - 77626, n=5)
77462 Points ∼33% 0%
Apple iPad Mini 5
77361 Points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
39260 Points ∼17% -49%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
26702 Points ∼11% -65%
Apple iPad Mini 4
18737 Points ∼8% -76%
Average of class Tablet (2411 - 106954, n=153)
15950 Points ∼7% -79%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Apple iPad Mini 5
274.08 fps ∼2%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (226 - 274, n=5)
249 fps ∼2% -9%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
78 fps ∼1% -72%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
69 fps ∼1% -75%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
51 fps ∼0% -81%
Apple iPad Mini 4
47.8 fps ∼0% -83%
Average of class Tablet (4.2 - 451, n=178)
32 fps ∼0% -88%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Average Apple A12 Bionic (59.5 - 60, n=5)
59.9 fps ∼2% +1%
Apple iPad Mini 5
59.47 fps ∼2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
58 fps ∼2% -2%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
51 fps ∼2% -14%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
47 fps ∼1% -21%
Apple iPad Mini 4
37 fps ∼1% -38%
Average of class Tablet (3.7 - 120, n=182)
21 fps ∼1% -65%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Apple iPad Mini 5
124.12 fps ∼22%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (107 - 139, n=5)
123 fps ∼22% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
60 fps ∼11% -52%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
39 fps ∼7% -69%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
23 fps ∼4% -81%
Apple iPad Mini 4
21.5 fps ∼4% -83%
Average of class Tablet (1.8 - 220, n=116)
21 fps ∼4% -83%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Average Apple A12 Bionic (58.5 - 60, n=5)
59.3 fps ∼16% +1%
Apple iPad Mini 5
58.92 fps ∼16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
36 fps ∼10% -39%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
24 fps ∼7% -59%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
21 fps ∼6% -64%
Apple iPad Mini 4
15.3 fps ∼4% -74%
Average of class Tablet (2.9 - 110, n=119)
14.7 fps ∼4% -75%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 5
369423 Points ∼65%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (302955 - 370545, n=4)
347775 Points ∼61% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
201881 Points ∼36% -45%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
181614 Points ∼32% -51%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 566378, n=31)
147105 Points ∼26% -60%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
142189 Points ∼25% -62%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Apple iPad Mini 5
1732 Points ∼85%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1711 - 1734, n=5)
1726 Points ∼85% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
1218 Points ∼60% -30%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
1215 Points ∼60% -30%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
1078 Points ∼53% -38%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1059 Points ∼52% -39%
Average of class Tablet (9 - 2034, n=109)
753 Points ∼37% -57%
Graphics
Average Apple A12 Bionic (15614 - 15969, n=5)
15755 Points ∼55% +1%
Apple iPad Mini 5
15659 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
6080 Points ∼21% -61%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
4143 Points ∼14% -74%
Apple iPad Mini 4
2668 Points ∼9% -83%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2257 Points ∼8% -86%
Average of class Tablet (98 - 28853, n=109)
2249 Points ∼8% -86%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3985 Points ∼53% +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
2900 Points ∼39% +40%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (1815 - 4169, n=5)
2684 Points ∼36% +29%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2347 Points ∼31% +13%
Apple iPad Mini 5
2078 Points ∼28%
Average of class Tablet (56 - 5423, n=109)
1072 Points ∼14% -48%
Apple iPad Mini 4
902 Points ∼12% -57%
System
Average Apple A12 Bionic (11675 - 12591, n=5)
12077 Points ∼73% +1%
Apple iPad Mini 5
11973 Points ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
5537 Points ∼34% -54%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
5282 Points ∼32% -56%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
3940 Points ∼24% -67%
Apple iPad Mini 4
3132 Points ∼19% -74%
Average of class Tablet (482 - 16467, n=109)
2463 Points ∼15% -79%
Overall
Average Apple A12 Bionic (4895 - 6097, n=5)
5396 Points ∼64% +6%
Apple iPad Mini 5
5097 Points ∼60%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
3302 Points ∼39% -35%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
2982 Points ∼35% -41%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
2322 Points ∼27% -54%
Apple iPad Mini 4
1681 Points ∼20% -67%
Average of class Tablet (150 - 8450, n=109)
1278 Points ∼15% -75%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score
Apple iPad Mini 5
2761 Points ∼52%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (2407 - 2873, n=5)
2680 Points ∼51% -3%
Average of class Tablet (301 - 5300, n=17)
1526 Points ∼29% -45%
Apple iPad Mini 4
426 Points ∼8% -85%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Mini 5 Apple A12 Bionic, Apple A12 Bionic GPU, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad Mini 4 Apple A8, PowerVR GX6450, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple A12 Bionic (41367 - 43280, n=5)
42486 Points ∼100% +3%
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
41367 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
12897 Points ∼30% -69%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
11338 Points ∼27% -73%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68)
10300 Points ∼24% -75%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
9962 Points ∼23% -76%
Average of class Tablet (1238 - 45734, n=170)
6729 Points ∼16% -84%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (603 - 43092, n=181)
9243 ms * ∼100% -1339%
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4 (Chrome 68)
3796.2 ms * ∼41% -491%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
3734 ms * ∼40% -481%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
2644.7 ms * ∼29% -312%
Apple iPad Mini 4 (Safari iOS 9)
2557 ms * ∼28% -298%
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
642.5 ms * ∼7%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (603 - 644, n=5)
622 ms * ∼7% +3%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
160 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (155 - 161, n=5)
158 Points ∼99% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 (Samsung Browser 8.0)
77 Points ∼48% -52%
Average of class Tablet (23 - 182, n=20)
73.7 Points ∼46% -54%
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 (Chrome 66)
72 Points ∼45% -55%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
124 runs/min ∼100%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (123 - 124, n=3)
123 runs/min ∼99% -1%
Average of class Tablet (11.1 - 132, n=10)
58.9 runs/min ∼48% -52%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Mini 5 (Safari 12.1)
109.891 Points ∼100%
Average Apple A12 Bionic (108 - 110, n=3)
109 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Tablet (0 - 110, n=6)
45.9 Points ∼42% -58%

* ... smaller is better

Arena of Valor
0102030405060Tooltip
; min: Ø59.4 (59-60)
; high HD: Ø59.4 (59-60)
PUBG Compare
0102030405060Tooltip
; Smooth: Ø29.4 (25-36)
; Balanced: Ø29.2 (25-31)
; HD: Ø29.6 (27-59)
Max. Load
 36.5 °C33.9 °C33.5 °C 
 37.1 °C34.7 °C34.5 °C 
 37.8 °C38.3 °C35 °C 
Maximum: 38.3 °C
Average: 35.7 °C
33.1 °C34.1 °C34.7 °C
34.5 °C28.2 °C35.1 °C
35.4 °C37.4 °C35.4 °C
Maximum: 37.4 °C
Average: 34.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.8 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.2 to 51.8 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap rear
Heatmap rear
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.246.22542.139.73134.636.64037.340.75039.842.46332.734.68027.740.310027.849.412525.754.316023.356.4200235625021.457.331521.460.340020.163.750020.567.663021.872.580020.474.910002072.5125018.271.8160018.972.220001872.8250019.171.7315018.269.640001864.750001964.863001873.5800018.175.41000018.171.51250018.265.41600018.152.4SPL67.731.383.6N23.11.660.4median 19.1median 67.6Delta1.86.532.630.931.539.736.135.830.240.633.842.728.432.326.628.324.427.221.934.420.44619.456.420.463.417.565.518.16817.369.41669.616.170.315.57115.273.615.175.81574.91576.114.976.115.172.315.170.715.367.215.266.215.264.615.263.315.259.227.785161.7median 15.3median 681.86.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Mini 5Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Mini 5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.3 / 2.2 / 5.3 Watt
Load midlight 9.8 / 12.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Mini 5
5124 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
6000 mAh
Power Consumption
15%
-2%
-10%
10%
Idle Minimum *
1.3
0.8
38%
1.76
-35%
2.1
-62%
1.2
8%
Idle Average *
2.2
3.6
-64%
4.22
-92%
3.74
-70%
2.2
-0%
Idle Maximum *
5.3
3.9
26%
4.25
20%
4.33
18%
4.1
23%
Load Average *
9.8
6.1
38%
4.52
54%
6.32
36%
8.2
16%
Load Maximum *
12.5
8
36%
7.35
41%
9.13
27%
12.2
2%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 53min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 38min
Apple iPad Mini 5
5124 mAh
Apple iPad Mini 4
 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4
7300 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M5 8.4
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Pad 4
6000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-5%
-7%
4%
7%
Reader / Idle
1733
1488
-14%
1227
-29%
1154
-33%
1364
-21%
H.264
891
643
-28%
735
-18%
701
-21%
914
3%
WiFi v1.3
791
539
-32%
495
-37%
627
-21%
827
5%
Load
158
242
53%
245
55%
298
89%
221
40%

Pros

+ 系统性能好
+ 耳机接口
+ 支持Apple Pencil
+ 机身坚固
+ 扬声器效果好

Cons

- LTE和更大储存溢价太高
- 内部存储无法拓展
- 缺少GPS
In review: Apple iPad Mini 5
In review: Apple iPad Mini 5

Apple决定不改变第五代iPad mini的设计,而是去针对所有那些想在老机子里面装新硬件的人设计了一台平板电脑。而这正是iPad mini 5所提供的。 Apple A12 Bionic提供卓越的性能,新的前置FaceTime相机是一个非常不错的升级,视频通话肯定会因此受益。 iOS 12.2是最新的,除非Apple突然更改其更新策略,否则将定期接收安全更新。

iPad mini 5在我们熟知的机身中提供全新的硬件。虽然也有可能是因为Apple无法想出一个新的但没必要的设计。

希望升级现有Apple设备的用户可以毫不犹豫买这台平板。那些还未被说服的人应该了解iPad mini的局限性。首先,由于缺少microSD卡插槽,内部存储无法扩展,因此唯一的选择仍然是云存储。苹果公司对LTE连接的溢价相当奇特,在竞争的Android设备上,它往往远低于120美元。仅支持Wi-Fi的版本也缺少GPS模块,在iPad和PC之间传输数据比预期的要复杂得多。然而,iPad mini 5以其令人印象深刻的性能推动了销售额。

Apple iPad Mini 5 - 05/03/2019 v6
Mike Wobker

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 80 → 84%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
29 / 65 → 44%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 97%
Battery
96%
Display
90%
Games Performance
77 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance
81 / 76 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
60 / 85 → 71%
Average
79%
92%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPad mini 5 平板电脑评测
Mike Wobker, 2019-06-23 (Update: 2019-06-23)