Notebookcheck

三星Galaxy S20+智能手机评测:有8K视频能力的手持设备

天才旗舰? 三星Galaxy S20 Plus提供的功能比Galaxy S20多。屏幕更大,电池更大,还多了一个后置摄像头。推出价格从7999元起,您应该对Galaxy S20 +充满期待。因此,我们将详细测试Galaxy S20 +,以了解其功能。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen),
Android ARM Smartphone Galaxy S
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Galaxy S20 Series)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 990 8 x 2 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G77 MP11
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.7 inch 20:9, 3200 x 1440 pixel 524 PPI, 10点触控, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 6, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB 
, 108 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: USB-C上的音频, Card Reader: 1 TB的microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速计,陀螺仪,接近传感器,指南针,气压计
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 8. LTE: Bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 161.9 x 73.7
Battery
4500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix f / 1.8,相位对比AF(双像素),OIS,LED闪光灯(1号摄像头);64 MPix f / ‐2.0,相位检测AF,OIS,视频@ 4320p / 24fps(2号摄像头); 12 MP,f / 1.8,相位检测自动对焦(双像素),OIS,LED闪光灯
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix , f/2.2, 相位检测自动对焦(双像素),视频@ 2160p / 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 游戏启动器, Keyboard: 虚拟, 快速充电器,USB Type-C电缆,S-Pen,SIM工具, 24 Months Warranty, LTE速度:下载-LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA 2 Gbps; 上传-Cat.20 3CA 316 Mbps。 SAR值:身体– 1.57 W / kg,头部– 0.376 W / kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
188 g, Power Supply: 59 g
Price
1000 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Device comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
06/2020
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11
188 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.7"3200x1440
87 %
10/2019
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
89 %
10/2019
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16
198 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.53"2400x1176
87 %
10/2019
OnePlus 7T Pro
SD 855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
85 %
03/2019
Sony Xperia 1
SD 855, Adreno 640
178 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"3840x1644
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
1010 (min: 912, max: 1092) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
533 (min: 468, max: 602) MBit/s ∼53% -36%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
835 (min: 808, max: 847) MBit/s ∼83%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
617 (min: 356, max: 662) MBit/s ∼61% -26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼57% -31%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼47% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=553)
264 MBit/s ∼26% -68%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
966 (min: 923, max: 995) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
637 (min: 584, max: 715) MBit/s ∼66% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Mali-G77 MP11, Exynos 990, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
863 (min: 759, max: 898) MBit/s ∼89%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼61% -32%
Sony Xperia 1
Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
531 (min: 414, max: 620) MBit/s ∼55% -38%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, SD 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼36% -59%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=553)
250 MBit/s ∼26% -71%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø835 (808-847)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø863 (759-898)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
20.8 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
18 ∆E
27 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
31.8 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 24.59 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 31.82 ∆E
ColorChecker
9.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S20+: 8.46 ∆E min: 3.48 - max: 13.24 ∆E
728
cd/m²
736
cd/m²
770
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
740
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
742
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 771 cd/m² Average: 747.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.12 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 740 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.269
Samsung Galaxy S20+
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
OLED, 2400x1176, 6.53
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Sony Xperia 1
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5
Screen
10%
-21%
-21%
17%
Brightness middle
740
790
7%
592
-20%
606
-18%
541
-27%
Brightness
747
790
6%
605
-19%
611
-18%
543
-27%
Brightness Distribution
94
97
3%
96
2%
95
1%
99
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.6
1.4
46%
2.5
4%
3.46
-33%
0.8
69%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
4.57
3.4
26%
5.5
-20%
5.64
-23%
1.7
63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.5
1.9
-27%
2.6
-73%
2
-33%
1.2
20%
Gamma
2.269 97%
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.258 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6284 103%
6466 101%
6173 105%
6779 96%
6601 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 214 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 214 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 214 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 50 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18037 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.2 ms).
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
2899 Points ∼95%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3062 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (2731 - 2899, n=3)
2815 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=81)
1984 Points ∼65% -32%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
944 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
781 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (903 - 944, n=3)
929 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=81)
567 Points ∼60% -40%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10583 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10322 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼99% -1%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8760 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10255 - 10583, n=3)
10423 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=482)
5782 Points ∼55% -45%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
14760 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
13947 Points ∼94% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼86% -14%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
10747 Points ∼73% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (14307 - 14760, n=3)
14592 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=640)
6325 Points ∼43% -57%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3230 Points ∼83%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
3870 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼92% +10%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2104 Points ∼54% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3112 - 3230, n=3)
3181 Points ∼82% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=142)
2637 Points ∼68% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8783 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6369 Points ∼73% -27%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼74% -26%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5007 Points ∼57% -43%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6315 - 8783, n=3)
7919 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=142)
2921 Points ∼33% -67%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6355 Points ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5570 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3832 Points ∼60% -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5139 - 6355, n=3)
5925 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=142)
2629 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4495 Points ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5576 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼84% +4%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1934 Points ∼35% -57%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4063 - 4495, n=3)
4335 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5766, n=488)
2154 Points ∼39% -52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9190 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6657 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼87% -13%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5674 Points ∼62% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8106 - 9190, n=3)
8818 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=488)
2044 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7459 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6382 Points ∼86% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3969 Points ∼53% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6638 - 7459, n=3)
7170 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=489)
1897 Points ∼25% -75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4455 Points ∼87%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5133 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼90% +3%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2345 Points ∼46% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3935 - 4455, n=3)
4275 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5721, n=518)
2065 Points ∼40% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9471 Points ∼83%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7970 Points ∼70% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100% +21%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9158 Points ∼80% -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (9470 - 11301, n=3)
10081 Points ∼88% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=518)
2719 Points ∼24% -71%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
7576 Points ∼88%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7098 Points ∼82% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100% +14%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5552 Points ∼65% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (7563 - 7981, n=3)
7707 Points ∼90% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=518)
2285 Points ∼27% -70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4180 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼82% -3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4909 Points ∼100% +17%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼92% +8%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2705 Points ∼55% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3963 - 4267, n=3)
4137 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=568)
2042 Points ∼42% -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
8469 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼72% -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6478 Points ∼76% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼83% -17%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
5663 Points ∼67% -33%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8257 - 8469, n=3)
8379 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=568)
1709 Points ∼20% -80%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6896 Points ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6048 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4556 Points ∼66% -34%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6732 - 6896, n=3)
6821 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7305, n=569)
1633 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4124 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼78% -7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4900 Points ∼100% +19%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼92% +9%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
3656 Points ∼75% -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3889 - 4124, n=3)
4009 Points ∼82% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5054, n=610)
1906 Points ∼39% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
6392 Points ∼57%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +77%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
7671 Points ∼68% +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼94% +66%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9447 Points ∼84% +48%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (6388 - 11488, n=3)
8089 Points ∼72% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=609)
2237 Points ∼20% -65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
5696 Points ∼70%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼97% +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6815 Points ∼83% +20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100% +43%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
7197 Points ∼88% +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (5646 - 8010, n=3)
6451 Points ∼79% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=612)
1929 Points ∼24% -66%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
27431 Points ∼63%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼78% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
43459 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼70% +11%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
28223 Points ∼65% +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (27431 - 42135, n=2)
34783 Points ∼80% +27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 57583, n=758)
15147 Points ∼35% -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
48476 Points ∼24%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +325%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
75073 Points ∼36% +55%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57% +144%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
105718 Points ∼51% +118%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (48476 - 79572, n=2)
64024 Points ∼31% +32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=756)
25423 Points ∼12% -48%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
41415 Points ∼43%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +134%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
64626 Points ∼67% +56%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75% +74%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
65656 Points ∼68% +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (41415 - 66452, n=2)
53934 Points ∼56% +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 110468, n=756)
20067 Points ∼21% -52%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
199 fps ∼69%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
152 fps ∼53% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% -7%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
167 fps ∼58% -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (199 - 200, n=3)
199 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=764)
43.3 fps ∼15% -78%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼75%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼74% -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼75% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (60 - 119, n=3)
79.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=773)
30.3 fps ∼38% -49%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
126 fps ∼80%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
106 fps ∼68% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71% -12%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
100 fps ∼64% -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (100 - 126, n=3)
111 fps ∼71% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=669)
25.5 fps ∼16% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
60 fps ∼100%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
60 fps ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95% -5%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (59 - 60, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=677)
21.6 fps ∼36% -64%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85 fps ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
56 fps ∼56% -34%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% -7%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
55 fps ∼55% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (72 - 85, n=3)
80.7 fps ∼81% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=532)
20.5 fps ∼21% -76%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
59 fps ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼82% +2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
73 fps ∼100% +24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼55% -32%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
41 fps ∼56% -31%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (58 - 59, n=3)
58.7 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=534)
18.8 fps ∼26% -68%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
33 fps ∼72%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +39%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
26 fps ∼57% -21%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% -48%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
17 fps ∼37% -48%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (22 - 33, n=3)
29.3 fps ∼64% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=280)
11.1 fps ∼24% -66%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
22 fps ∼76%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +32%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66% -14%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
22 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (20 - 22, n=3)
21.3 fps ∼73% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=278)
8.04 fps ∼28% -63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
52 fps ∼90%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
40 fps ∼69% -23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45% -50%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
34 fps ∼59% -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 52, n=3)
51 fps ∼88% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=284)
16.5 fps ∼28% -68%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
58 fps ∼77%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +29%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
49 fps ∼65% -16%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% -19%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼56% -28%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (54 - 58, n=3)
56 fps ∼75% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=283)
19.2 fps ∼26% -67%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
51 fps ∼81%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
41 fps ∼65% -20%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76% -6%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
42 fps ∼67% -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (50 - 51, n=3)
50.3 fps ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=457)
13.9 fps ∼22% -73%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
45 fps ∼94%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +7%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
34 fps ∼71% -24%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50% -47%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
33 fps ∼69% -27%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=461)
12.3 fps ∼26% -73%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
296746 Points ∼61%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
483224 Points ∼99% +63%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼100% +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (296746 - 504192, n=3)
433215 Points ∼89% +46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=86)
314420 Points ∼65% +6%
Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
85.55 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
29.22 (min: 4.07, max: 95.16) fps ∼34% -66%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
45.28 fps ∼53% -47%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (84.1 - 85.6, n=2)
84.8 fps ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.73 - 85.6, n=73)
19.2 fps ∼22% -78%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
63.02 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
31.12 (min: 11.09, max: 63.1) fps ∼49% -51%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
28.5 fps ∼45% -55%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (42.3 - 63, n=2)
52.7 fps ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 63, n=64)
16 fps ∼25% -75%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
71.45 fps ∼100%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
33.9 (min: 9.36, max: 74.72) fps ∼47% -53%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
44.62 fps ∼62% -38%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (71.5 - 71.6, n=2)
71.5 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 71.6, n=62)
19.9 fps ∼28% -72%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4607 Score ∼92%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
4997 Score ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4607 - 4957, n=3)
4783 Score ∼96% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 7649, n=82)
2609 Score ∼52% -43%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
1378 Points ∼79%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
1462 Points ∼84% +6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71% -10%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
1300 Points ∼74% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (1270 - 1378, n=3)
1307 Points ∼75% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=701)
801 Points ∼46% -42%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
10803 Points ∼64%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +57%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
10112 Points ∼59% -6%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62% -2%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
9318 Points ∼55% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (10703 - 10803, n=3)
10762 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=701)
2394 Points ∼14% -78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
3775 Points ∼62%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼38% -38%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
6130 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼83% +35%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
2661 Points ∼43% -30%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (3775 - 4497, n=3)
4181 Points ∼68% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8398, n=701)
1773 Points ∼29% -53%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
9281 Points ∼65%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
9309 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66% 0%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
8870 Points ∼63% -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (8843 - 9478, n=3)
9201 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=701)
3339 Points ∼24% -64%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S20+
Samsung Exynos 990, Mali-G77 MP11, 8192
4779 Points ∼85%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192
5389 Points ∼96% +13%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89% +4%
Sony Xperia 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144
4112 Points ∼73% -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 990
  (4764 - 4915, n=3)
4819 Points ∼86% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6205, n=701)
1693 Points ∼30% -65%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +155%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
65.88 Points ∼51% +30%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48% +23%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
59.453 Points ∼46% +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.6 - 53.9, n=3)
52.1 Points ∼40% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
50.566 Points ∼39%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=164)
39.8 Points ∼31% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +238%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
115.49 Points ∼38% +29%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38% +29%
Sony Xperia 1
110.81 Points ∼37% +24%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (89.3 - 93.5, n=3)
90.8 Points ∼30% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
89.329 Points ∼30%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=593)
45.9 Points ∼15% -49%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +144%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
74.1 runs/min ∼48% +18%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43% +6%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
64.2 runs/min ∼42% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chome 80)
62.8 runs/min ∼41%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (50.8 - 63.7, n=3)
59.1 runs/min ∼39% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=148)
42.8 runs/min ∼28% -32%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +110%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
119 Points ∼66% +38%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
106 Points ∼59% +23%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51% +8%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (86 - 97, n=3)
89.7 Points ∼50% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
86 Points ∼48%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=228)
69.6 Points ∼38% -19%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +173%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49% +33%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
23568 Points ∼48% +30%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
23318 Points ∼47% +29%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (18094 - 19122, n=3)
18459 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
18094 Points ∼37%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=759)
7611 Points ∼15% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=785)
9959 ms * ∼100% -300%
Samsung Galaxy S20+ (Chrome 80)
2488.3 ms * ∼25%
Average Samsung Exynos 990 (2345 - 2511, n=3)
2448 ms * ∼25% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼21% +14%
Sony Xperia 1 (Chrome 75)
2039.9 ms * ∼20% +18%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)
1962.5 ms * ∼20% +21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼6% +77%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy S20+Huawei Mate 30 ProOnePlus 7T ProSony Xperia 1Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
6%
-38%
-57%
-7%
-55%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
57.6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
69.22 (Nano Memory Card)
20%
27.84 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-52%
59.3 (54.5 - 66.4, n=7)
3%
50.6 (1.7 - 87.1, n=504)
-12%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
66.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.49 (Nano Memory Card)
23%
31.34 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-53%
72 (66.3 - 81.6, n=7)
8%
68.7 (8.1 - 96.5, n=504)
3%
Random Write 4KB
229.8
259.21
13%
26
-89%
24.16
-89%
182 (29.9 - 230, n=9)
-21%
32.1 (0.14 - 319, n=847)
-86%
Random Read 4KB
199.6
226.38
13%
169
-15%
147.32
-26%
194 (170 - 207, n=9)
-3%
56.2 (1.59 - 324, n=847)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
694.3
401.79
-42%
405
-42%
206.87
-70%
527 (213 - 697, n=9)
-24%
119 (2.99 - 911, n=847)
-83%
Sequential Read 256KB
1603.1
1780.5
11%
1489
-7%
749.82
-53%
1511 (1406 - 1632, n=9)
-6%
324 (12.1 - 1802, n=847)
-80%
010203040506070Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 0.17.0: Ø59.5 (54-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 0.17.0: Ø39.6 (23-42)
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60.1 (60-61)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø60 (48-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.1.2a: Ø57.1 (12-61)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.1.2a: Ø58.6 (39-61)
Max. Load
 44.6 °C43.9 °C40.4 °C 
 44.7 °C44.2 °C40.4 °C 
 44.8 °C42.9 °C39.8 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 42.9 °C
38.1 °C42.2 °C42.3 °C
37.9 °C42.9 °C43.6 °C
37.6 °C42.3 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.348.92537.543.2312931.24031.631.25033.235.46328.329.98023.322.510023.323.312524.230.416020.541.52001948.225017.652.231516.954.440016.256.850016.463.363018.36680016.166100014.770.9125014.274.3160014.776.1200013.976.2250014.376.4315014.975.3400014.875.3500015.371.4630014.967.380001570.41000015.572.31250016.469.3160001672.4SPL75.372.427.585.6N3326.1160.9median 16median 69.3Delta29.332.239.436.225.529.126.83027.742.342.426.827.220.325.22536.717.244.817.954.317.153.817.95316.253.616.55615.35915.664.415.664.814.867.214.472.314.67314.776.914.176.414.476.914.475.914.973.514.773.814.57214.866.6156316.649.427.185.80.961median 15median 64.81.29.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSamsung Galaxy S20+Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Samsung Galaxy S20+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.7 / 2.3 Watt
Load midlight 5.8 / 11.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Average Samsung Exynos 990
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-1%
22%
-40%
22%
7%
20%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.92
8%
0.87
13%
2.1
-110%
1
-0%
0.887 (0.76 - 1, n=3)
11%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=859)
12%
Idle Average *
1.7
2.9
-71%
1.75
-3%
3
-76%
1.48
13%
1.703 (1.5 - 1.91, n=3)
-0%
1.751 (0.6 - 6.2, n=858)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
2.3
2.94
-28%
1.83
20%
3.5
-52%
1.56
32%
2.09 (1.96 - 2.3, n=3)
9%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=859)
12%
Load Average *
5.8
3.65
37%
3.85
34%
5.3
9%
3.76
35%
5.11 (4.72 - 5.8, n=3)
12%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=853)
29%
Load Maximum *
11.8
6.18
48%
6.64
44%
8.3
30%
8.48
28%
11.2 (10.2 - 11.8, n=3)
5%
6.03 (1.2 - 14.2, n=853)
49%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
34h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 18min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
Samsung Galaxy S20+
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
Huawei Mate 30 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Sony Xperia 1
3330 mAh
Battery Runtime
42%
6%
11%
-27%
Reader / Idle
2041
2618
28%
2174
7%
2015
-1%
1067
-48%
H.264
978
1346
38%
1098
12%
957
-2%
712
-27%
WiFi v1.3
794
909
14%
823
4%
912
15%
441
-44%
Load
218
408
87%
219
0%
283
30%
246
13%

Pros

+ 屏幕非常亮
+ 120 Hz用着舒服
+ 现代的UI
+ 快速Wi-Fi
+ 8K视频录制...

Cons

- ...但是没有自动对焦
- 对1080p以上的60 FPS视频的限制
- 网络性能不佳
- 重负荷下的降频
- 预装软件多

Verdict - Camera weaknesses

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.
The Samsung Galaxy S20+ smartphone review. Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de.

在三星以7999元推出它之后不久,Galaxy S20 +的价格已经大幅下跌。无疑,这对消费者来说是个好消息,因为他们可以通过花更少的钱来获得相同的智能手机。但是,欧洲客户将收到无法发挥其潜力的Galaxy S20 +。主要原因是三星为该设备配备了Exynos 990,它的内部芯片组在许多领域都没有达到Snapdragon 865的水平。简而言之,与Snapdragon 865相比,欧洲Galaxy S20 +的5G连接更差,在负载下的降频严重,并且CPU性能更差。总体而言,配备高通骁龙865的Galaxy S20 +版本是两款设备中最好的。

至少Exynos SoC的续航现在正在慢慢接近竞争水平。不过,Exynos 990在持续负载下比较耗电。即使是Galaxy S20 +,您都不应该期望三星拥有一流的充电技术,因为三星将其保留给了Galaxy S20 Ultra。总的来说,与S20 Ultra相比,Galaxy S20和Galaxy S20 Plus都感觉像是大幅阉割版。

这主要是由于三星提供的相机。如果没有真正的光学变焦,三星似乎会觉得8K视频功能优先于合适的远摄镜头。但是,该公司对8K视频录制施加了许多限制,例如无法缩放或使用自动对焦。同样,三星限制以1080p及以上的分辨率拍摄60帧FPS视频时可以使用哪些选项。

虽然Galaxy S20 +拍照表现还算可以,但相机上的省略仍然令人遗憾。One UI 2.1感觉很现代,并包含最新的安全补丁,而该设备具有明亮且响应迅速的AMOLED屏幕。

三星Galaxy S20 +使用了特殊技巧来隐藏相机的弱点。不过,其出色的屏幕仍然值得一看。

简而言之,如果您想要最好的相机智能手机,应该去看看别家的。三星将为您提供高质量的旗舰产品,该产品可凭借其Wi-Fi,良好的通话质量,出色的GPS精度,令人印象深刻的制造质量和超长的续航来为您提供惊喜。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Samsung Galaxy S20+ - 03/30/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
91%
Games Performance
57 / 64 → 88%
Application Performance
75 / 86 → 87%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
78%
Average
81%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 三星Galaxy S20+智能手机评测:有8K视频能力的手持设备
Florian Schmitt, 2020-06- 6 (Update: 2020-06- 7)
Alex Alderson
Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - News Editor - @aldersonaj