Notebookcheck

亚马逊 Fire HD 8 (2017) 平板电脑简短评测

Manuel Masiero (translated by Yuchen Wang), 07/16/2017
Android Tablet Touchscreen

超实惠。 亚马逊更新了它的8寸平板电脑Fire HD 8。根据配置的不同它售价在80美元到125美元间——它的价格已经低到了难以置信的程度。我们的评测将会着重考察它是否物有所值。在今年的Prime Day时,它的售价甚至低达49美元!

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Fire Series)
Processor
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720
Memory
1536 MB 
Display
8 inch 16:10, 1280x800 pixel 189 PPI, 10-point Multitouch, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.99 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5毫米音频接口, Card Reader: microSD读卡器最大支持256 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,陀螺仪,环境光感应器
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.1 LE
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.7 x 214 x 128
Battery
Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 12 h
Operating System
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.3 MPix VGA, 640 x 480
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 1600 x 1200, 720p 视频拍摄
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard Light: yes, 5伏电源适配器,microUSB 2.0数据线,快速开始说明, 亚马逊应用商店,亚马逊内置应用,Silk浏览器, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
369 g, Power Supply: 35 g
Price
110 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼100% +110%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
209 MBit/s ∼100% +143%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s ∼41%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
419
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 427 cd/m² Average: 411.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.14 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 419 cd/m²
Contrast: 1074:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.5 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 10.3 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.6
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
IPS, 1280x800, 8
Xiaomi MiPad 2
IPS, 2048x1536, 7.9
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4
Screen
21%
14%
9%
Brightness
412
348
-16%
402
-2%
445
8%
Brightness Distribution
91
90
-1%
91
0%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.39
0.26
33%
0.4
-3%
0.45
-15%
Contrast
1074
1396
30%
1063
-1%
1022
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.5
5.8
32%
4.98
41%
6.2
27%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
10.3
5.5
47%
5.2
50%
6.5
37%
Gamma
2.6 92%
2.24 107%
2.65 91%
2.33 103%
CCT
6216 105%
7388 88%
7249 90%
8056 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6262 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
86735 Points ∼38% +150%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
73083 Points ∼32% +111%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
36440 Points ∼16% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points ∼15%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points ∼43%
Work performance score
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5279 Points ∼64% +28%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5204 Points ∼63% +26%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4507 Points ∼54% +9%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points ∼50%
BaseMark OS II
Web
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1022 Points ∼66% +72%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
952 Points ∼62% +61%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
655 Points ∼42% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points ∼38%
Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1609 Points ∼19% +382%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1302 Points ∼15% +290%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
339 Points ∼4% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points ∼4%
Memory
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2212 Points ∼50% +201%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1379 Points ∼31% +87%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
908 Points ∼21% +23%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points ∼17%
System
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3581 Points ∼54% +211%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1921 Points ∼29% +67%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
1271 Points ∼19% +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points ∼18%
Overall
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1800 Points ∼47% +181%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1419 Points ∼37% +122%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
712 Points ∼19% +11%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points ∼17%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5277 Points ∼19% +233%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1583 Points ∼6%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1726 Points ∼31% +187%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
601 Points ∼11%
Geekbench 4.1
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points ∼9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points ∼13%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2322 Points ∼77% +164%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1572 Points ∼52% +79%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points ∼29%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
793 Points ∼26% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1261 Points ∼23% +942%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
832 Points ∼15% +588%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points ∼2%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
116 Points ∼2% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1319 Points ∼34% +779%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
970 Points ∼25% +547%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points ∼4%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
143 Points ∼4% -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2261 Points ∼75% +157%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1580 Points ∼52% +79%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
920 Points ∼31% +4%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points ∼29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1300 Points ∼17% +574%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
997 Points ∼13% +417%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
203 Points ∼3% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points ∼2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi MiPad 2
1353 Points ∼27% +478%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
1139 Points ∼23% +387%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
246 Points ∼5% +5%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points ∼5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi MiPad 2
20142 Points ∼28% +117%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
15538 Points ∼22% +68%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
10857 Points ∼15% +17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points ∼13%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2
27537 Points ∼6% +407%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
22141 Points ∼5% +307%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points ∼1%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
5326 Points ∼1% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Xiaomi MiPad 2
25460 Points ∼13% +325%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
20230 Points ∼10% +238%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
6006 Points ∼3% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points ∼3%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Xiaomi MiPad 2
32 fps ∼2% +223%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
29 fps ∼2% +193%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
10 fps ∼1% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps ∼1%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
23 fps ∼5% +35%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
17 fps ∼4% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps ∼4%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% -24%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
13 fps ∼2% +261%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2% +133%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
3.6 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
9 fps ∼2% +27%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
7.2 fps ∼2% +1%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps ∼2%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼2% -11%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
13 fps ∼3% +465%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
7.7 fps ∼2% +235%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
2.3 fps ∼1% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2.3 fps ∼1%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6.3 fps ∼4% +26%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
5.1 fps ∼3% +2%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5 fps ∼3%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.2 fps ∼2% -16%
GFXBench 4.0
off screen Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
8.4 fps ∼2%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
4.8 fps ∼1%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi MiPad 2
5.7 fps ∼0%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
3.1 fps ∼0%

Legend

 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi MiPad 2 Intel Atom x5-Z8500, Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
11404 Points ∼100% +304%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
7994 Points ∼70% +183%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2826 Points ∼25%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
2821 Points ∼25% 0%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
136 Points ∼100% +139%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
57 Points ∼42% 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
57 Points ∼42%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
53.7 Points ∼100% +175%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
43.039 Points ∼80% +120%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
19.519 Points ∼36%
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
19.3 Points ∼36% -1%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
12160.7 ms * ∼100% -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
11817.6 ms * ∼97%
Xiaomi MiPad 2
4420.4 ms * ∼36% +63%
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
2822.9 ms * ∼23% +76%

* ... smaller is better

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026AXiaomi MiPad 2Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
AndroBench 3-5
-14%
12%
69%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
34.15
24.9
-27%
23.52
-31%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
51.06
35.2
-31%
61.65
21%
Random Write 4KB
11.51
8.35
-27%
13.96
21%
31.35
172%
Random Read 4KB
21.55
21.96
2%
24.42
13%
32.04
49%
Sequential Write 256KB
47.23
45.71
-3%
56.37
19%
117.15
148%
Sequential Read 256KB
159.08
158.44
0%
147.85
-7%
249.68
57%
Max. Load
 35.4 °C34.4 °C33.7 °C 
 37.5 °C34.1 °C34.1 °C 
 36.7 °C34.8 °C32.8 °C 
Maximum: 37.5 °C
Average: 34.8 °C
30.5 °C33 °C36.8 °C
31.7 °C32.4 °C37.7 °C
31.7 °C33.4 °C35.5 °C
Maximum: 37.7 °C
Average: 33.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.635.52525.437.83125.336.64032.933.15033.633.16331.637.68028.442.81002746.212520.849.41602247.720021.350.625020.857.231521.254.340019.460.750019.565.363017.765.880017.966.2100017.865.2125017.362.8160017.464200016.763.9250017.266.7315018.267.3400017.966.6500017.669630017.769800017.863.81000017.962.91250018.159.41600018.246.6SPL3077.7N1.343.8median 17.9Amazon Fire HD 8 2017median 63.8Delta1.35.831.638.825.437.225.328.932.930.833.641.731.632.828.429.22722.620.828.62242.921.349.920.851.121.260.119.46719.570.417.771.417.972.617.875.517.375.317.475.516.775.317.277.818.281.717.979.317.670.917.765.917.867.717.962.718.151.918.247.730881.369.4median 17.9Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inchmedian 67.71.312.324.330.828.624.325.930.22725.926.329.83026.329.130.334.929.127.627.531.627.623.624.935.323.622.824.528.122.827.627.728.827.638.638.236.338.620.12321.720.122.926.720.422.92933.620.12939.943.921.139.947.752.123.347.755.159.72455.151.25618.751.258.462.918.458.46164.518616265.916.5626064.414.36058.162.515.658.156.760.714.156.75963.314596165.214.36158.96314.858.959.263.513.759.257.361.313.457.351.955.913.251.960.263.913.260.256.960.613.156.97175.129.47126.734.41.326.7median 56.9Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026Amedian 60.7median 16.5median 56.99.29.53.79.2hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (18.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 33%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.04 / 0.18 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.99 / 2.74 / 2.83 Watt
Load midlight 4.51 / 5.69 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
-3%
-110%
-46%
Idle Minimum *
0.99
1.32
-33%
3.33
-236%
1.51
-53%
Idle Average *
2.74
2.71
1%
5.01
-83%
3.64
-33%
Idle Maximum *
2.83
2.83
-0%
5.19
-83%
3.68
-30%
Load Average *
4.51
4.24
6%
8.32
-84%
6.95
-54%
Load Maximum *
5.69
5.01
12%
9.33
-64%
9.11
-60%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 52min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
12h 50min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 33min
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A
4000 mAh
Xiaomi MiPad 2
6190 mAh
Huawei MediaPad M3 8.4 inch
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
-30%
-45%
-32%
Reader / Idle
2032
1305
-36%
1110
-45%
H.264
744
624
-16%
583
-22%
WiFi v1.3
770
472
-39%
421
-45%
546
-29%
Load
393
287
-27%
268
-32%

Pros

+ 不错的品质和质感
+ microSD读卡器最大支持256GB
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 双频无线网模组
+ 使用中十分清凉
+ 无降频问题
+ Dolby Atmos立体声技术
+ 长电池续航
+ 实惠

Cons

- 绑定亚马逊服务
- 基于过时的安卓5.1.1系统
- 不支持谷歌支付
- 相机品质较差
- 不支持NFC,GSM/UMTS/LTE
- 不支持GPS
In review: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017). Review model courtesy of Amazon Germany.
In review: Amazon Fire HD 8 (2017). Review model courtesy of Amazon Germany.

与它的7寸和10寸师兄师弟以及前代机型相似的是,亚马逊Fire HD 8 (2017)提供了难以置信的性价比。

搭配一块8寸1280x800像素IPS屏幕,一颗MediaTek MT8163四核处理器,和16或32GB闪存,Fire HD提供了日常使用所需的性能。尽管大部分竞争对手在性能上不占劣势,但售价也都相比更高。在80美元到125美元之间,这台品质优秀的平板电脑可以带给用户长电池续航和不错的立体声音响效果。

已经拥有前代机型的用户,可以考虑跳过这个最新版本。除了一些较小的改进(支持更大容量的microSD卡,稍快的显卡)之外,它的变化并不大。

另一方面,这台平板电脑也有它受到限制的地方,其中比较重要的可能是它的配套亚马逊系列服务。谷歌的Play Store并没有得到官方支持,安装它将会破坏质保。如果你愿意在亚马逊的世界中生活的话,Fire HD 8 (2017)将是个完美的设备。

它的其他弱点包括过时很久的安卓5.1.1操作系统,缺少GPS和移动网络支持,以及差到你需要睁一只眼闭一只眼才可能勉强接受的相机。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 - 07/07/2017 v6
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
29 / 65 → 44%
Weight
85 / 88 → 94%
Battery
95%
Display
79%
Games Performance
10 / 68 → 14%
Application Performance
35 / 76 → 46%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 91 → 87%
Camera
24 / 85 → 28%
Average
67%
81%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 亚马逊 Fire HD 8 (2017) 平板电脑简短评测
Manuel Masiero, 2017-07-16 (Update: 2017-07-16)