Notebookcheck Logo

Cubot袖珍智能手机评论。极其方便的Android ,价格低廉的手机

如此之小,几乎是一个设计师的手机。 Cubot Pocket的屏幕尺寸仅为4英寸,非常适合小手和狭窄的口袋使用。Cubot的超便捷Android ,但Pocket已经不像以前那么便宜了,但Pocket还值得购买吗?
ARM Android Smartphone
库博特口袋
Cubot Pocket
Processor
UNISOC Tiger T310 4 x 1.8 - 2 GHz
Graphics adapter
PowerVR GE8300
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
4.00 inch 18:9, 1080 x 540 pixel 302 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio cia USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 128GB) , NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B40) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 12.5 x 119 x 58
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
charger, USB-C cable, headset, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
128 g
Price
169 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.3 %
07/2022
Cubot Pocket
T310, PowerVR GE8300
128 g64 GB eMMC Flash4.00"1080x540
73.5 %
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
123 g32 GB eMMC Flash4.00"1080x540
86.1 %
04/2022
Apple iPhone SE 2022
A15, A15 GPU 5-Core
144 g64 GB SSD4.70"1334x750
77.6 %
05/2022
realme C35
T616, Mali-G57 MP1
189 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080

外壳和功能。这款可能是设计师的手机实际上看起来很别致

只有少数厂商仍在生产真正方便的、屏幕相对较小的智能手机。其中包括Apple ,其iPhone minis和iPhone SEs,以及来自中国深圳的较不知名的制造商Cubot。虽然这些手机在过去几年里被称为 金刚迷你而Cubot Pocket则希望更时尚一些--就像最新时尚杂志旁边的生活配件。

Cubot对其非常紧凑的手机的外观进行了调整,以达到这一效果。它仍然有一个橡胶背,但现在有了别致的颜色,如青绿色配金色或黑色配红色金属框架。有趣的是,可见的螺丝,实际上在抗震加固的手机中更常见,也给人一种别致的工业气息。

Pocket再次明显小于和轻于一台 iPhone SE 2022但它也有相当的厚度:12.1毫米不再是我们所习惯的现代手机的厚度。这款手机的手感很好,但在背面施加压力时,会无声地收缩,这在一定程度上降低了质量印象。

Cubot的手机收费为169欧元,这比Cubot King Kong Mini 2的价格高得多。 金刚迷你2售价为119欧元。但你仍然得到64GB的存储空间和用于移动支付服务的NFC。

机上有一个用于内存扩展的microSD读卡器,在速度上与其他廉价智能手机不相上下。

库博特口袋
库博特口袋
库博特口袋
库博特口袋
库博特口袋
库博特口袋

尺寸比较

164.4 mm 75.6 mm 8.1 mm 189 g138.4 mm 67.3 mm 7.3 mm 144 g119 mm 58 mm 12.5 mm 128 g119 mm 58 mm 12.1 mm 123 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.9 - 59.2, n=100, last 2 years)
26.3 MB/s ∼100% +30%
realme C35
  (Angelbird V60)
20.5 MB/s ∼78% +1%
Cubot Pocket
  (Angelbird V60)
20.2 MB/s ∼77%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Cubot Pocket PowerVR GE8300, T310, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.7 (16.4-44.2)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (18.7-45.1)
Cubot Pocket PowerVR GE8300, T310, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.8 (30.2-82.7)
realme C35 Mali-G57 MP1, T616, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.4 (34.6-83.9)

通信、软件和操作。仅限LTE和Wi-Fi 4

在Cubot Pocket中,LTE是可用的,但只有少数频率可以使用。尽管我们的评测样品是为欧洲市场设计的,可能在大多数时候都能在欧洲访问移动互联网,但在前往遥远的国家时,事情可能会变得很困难。

WiFi 4是Cubot Pocket可以处理的最快的WLAN标准。它实现了典型的传输速率,但我们觉得更高的数据接收速度是可能的。这款手机无法与iPhone SE等竞争,它们的性能和价格等级完全不同。

Android 手机上有11项功能,制造商在软件方面没有任何改变,所以你可以很容易地找到你的方式。按钮和键盘在小屏幕上感觉有点小,但由于准确的触摸屏,即使是大手,你通常也能找到正确的位置。没有指纹传感器用于解锁,但基于软件的人脸识别可以通过前置摄像头进行。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
802.11a/b/g/n
324 (317min - 329max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
802.11a/b/g/n
329 (307min - 338max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
888 (869min - 906max) MBit/s ∼100% +141%
Cubot Pocket
802.11a/b/g/n
368 (355min - 378max) MBit/s ∼41%
realme C35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
347 (309min - 366max) MBit/s ∼39% -6%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Apple iPhone SE 2022
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
746 (599min - 768max) MBit/s ∼100% +255%
realme C35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
244 (179min - 255max) MBit/s ∼33% +16%
Cubot Pocket
802.11a/b/g/n
210 (204min - 215max) MBit/s ∼28%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø209 (204-215)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (355-378)

照相机。仅用于快照,请

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

与之相比 金刚迷你2相比之下,Cubot Pocket提供了一个1600万像素的摄像头,这对于日常使用来说应该是足够的。然而,相机在正常的日光下似乎过于紧张,烧毁了明亮的区域或拍摄了相当暗的照片。细节在一定程度上是可识别的,但大多是浑浊的。

Cubot Pocket的相机在弱光下无法照亮非常暗的区域,图像的清晰度在这里也有很大的不足。与Cubot Pocket的照片相比,价格相近的 realme C35似乎至少高出一个档次。我们的测试设备只能提供基本的成像性能。

前置的500万像素摄像头也需要非常好的光线来拍摄像样的自拍。在我们的测试照片中,可以识别主体,但许多细节都丢失了,只有非常粗糙的结构在较暗的地方部分显示出来。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.2 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
19 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Cubot Pocket: 14.85 ∆E min: 2.09 - max: 21.24 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Cubot Pocket: 47.61 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

显示。在Cubot Pocket中明亮的IPS屏幕

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

分辨率相当低的IPS屏幕只提供了四分之一的像素的 realme C35但这在小屏幕上似乎没有问题,并导致了足够准确的显示。632cd/m²的最大亮度在平均水平上是不错的,而且屏幕的光照也相当均匀。

我们没有注意到任何PWM。作为IPS屏幕的常见现象,响应时间有点长。在我们用分光光度计和CalMAN软件进行的测量中,我们发现强烈的色调和棕色的显示非常不准确,而灰度水平则相当准确,最多只是有点太亮。

635
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
613
cd/m²
654
cd/m²
628
cd/m²
610
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
632
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 654 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 631.7 cd/m² Minimum: 11.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 628 cd/m²
Contrast: 1102:1 (Black: 0.57 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.23 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
83.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.136
Cubot Pocket
IPS, 1080x540, 4.00
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
IPS, 1080x540, 4.00
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Retina HD, IPS, 1334x750, 4.70
realme C35
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Response Times
-18%
-28%
-28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(17, 17)
46 ?(23, 23)
-35%
56 ?(27, 29)
-65%
50 ?(29, 21)
-47%
Response Time Black / White *
22 ?(10, 12)
22 ?(7, 15)
-0%
20 ?(7, 13)
9%
24 ?(9, 13)
-9%
PWM Frequency
354.6 ?(15)
Screen
-31%
28%
-25%
Brightness middle
628
624
-1%
662
5%
585
-7%
Brightness
632
633
0%
647
2%
558
-12%
Brightness Distribution
93
90
-3%
92
-1%
89
-4%
Black Level *
0.57
0.87
-53%
0.4
30%
0.6
-5%
Contrast
1102
717
-35%
1655
50%
975
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.23
5.21
-23%
1.44
66%
4.4
-4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.81
10.59
-20%
4.74
46%
8.77
-0%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
4.8
-109%
1.7
26%
5.9
-157%
Gamma
2.136 103%
2.585 85%
2.179 101%
2.228 99%
CCT
6945 94%
6953 93%
6746 96%
8001 81%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-25% / -28%
0% / 17%
-27% / -26%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 12 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命:便捷的Cubot Pocket持续时间长

正如你所期望的那样,在这个价格范围内,Cubot Pocket中的Unisoc Tiger T310是一款用于入门级设备的SoC。与联发科Helio A22相比,它在性能上有很大的飞跃。 联发科Helio A22中的联发科Helio A22相比,它的性能有了很大的飞跃。 金刚迷你2但它不能跟上 虎牌T616中的 realme C35.总的来说,即使对于这样一款廉价的手机,其性能也不太符合要求。

在日常使用中,系统运行平稳,但一旦事情变得更多,就会通过停顿或较长的等待时间来注意到薄弱的性能。eMMC闪存也很慢,而 Realme C35由于其UFS内存,在现实世界的存储性能方面更有说服力。

尽管性能不是很高,但在较长时间的负载下,系统在整个正面明显发热。然而,它并不像Cubot King Kong Mini 2那样热。 丘博特金刚迷你2.

在粉红噪声测试中,扬声器无法说服我们的软件系统。我们的特殊麦克风记录的声音值与最佳中值波动太大。在实践中,歌曲听起来相当平淡,没有低音。然而,声音还没有高到令人不快的程度。没有3.5毫米的音频输出端口--用户必须使用USB-C端口或蓝牙。

3000毫安时的电池可以通过附带的充电器充电,最大功率为10瓦。鉴于电池较小,这足以让Cubot Pocket在大约1.5小时内充满电。根据我们的WLAN测试,电池可持续使用16:34小时,因此在正常使用时,你只需每隔一天插一次电。

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
376 Points ∼22%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
134 Points ∼8% -64%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
1741 Points ∼100% +363%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
298 Points ∼17% -21%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
376 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=269, last 2 years)
687 Points ∼39% +83%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
756 Points ∼16%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
439 Points ∼9% -42%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
4788 Points ∼100% +533%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1184 Points ∼25% +57%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
756 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=269, last 2 years)
2233 Points ∼47% +195%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
6866 Points ∼67%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
8066 Points ∼79% +17%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
6866 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=173, last 2 years)
10212 Points ∼100% +49%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
704 Points ∼14%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
456 Points ∼9% -35%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1710 Points ∼34% +143%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
704 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13341, n=229, last 2 years)
5080 Points ∼100% +622%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
607 Points ∼8%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
400 Points ∼5% -34%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1518 Points ∼21% +150%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
607 Points ∼8% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=229, last 2 years)
7291 Points ∼100% +1101%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1590 Points ∼49%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
895 Points ∼27% -44%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3063 Points ∼94% +93%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
1590 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=227, last 2 years)
3268 Points ∼100% +106%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
406 Points ∼16%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
245 Points ∼10% -40%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1103 Points ∼45% +172%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
406 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=183, last 2 years)
2472 Points ∼100% +509%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
335 Points ∼13%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
203 Points ∼8% -39%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
935 Points ∼37% +179%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
335 Points ∼13% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=183, last 2 years)
2544 Points ∼100% +659%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1572 Points ∼53%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
869 Points ∼29% -45%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2959 Points ∼100% +88%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
1572 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5262, n=183, last 2 years)
2862 Points ∼97% +82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
404 Points ∼10%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
260 Points ∼6% -36%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1109 Points ∼27% +175%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
404 Points ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11909, n=243, last 2 years)
4072 Points ∼100% +908%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
333 Points ∼6%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
216 Points ∼4% -35%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
939 Points ∼18% +182%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
333 Points ∼6% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 20955, n=243, last 2 years)
5226 Points ∼100% +1469%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1588 Points ∼49%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
899 Points ∼28% -43%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3036 Points ∼94% +91%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
1588 Points ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=243, last 2 years)
3245 Points ∼100% +104%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
9.1 fps ∼15%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
6.1 fps ∼10% -33%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +559%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.4 fps ∼9% -41%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
9.1 fps ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 104, n=265, last 2 years)
29.5 fps ∼49% +224%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
3 fps ∼3%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
2 fps ∼2% -33%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
95.9 fps ∼100% +3097%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.1 fps ∼6% +103%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
3 fps ∼3% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 136, n=266, last 2 years)
35.5 fps ∼37% +1083%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
5.9 fps ∼10%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
3.9 fps ∼7% -34%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +917%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
3.4 fps ∼6% -42%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
5.9 fps ∼10% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3 - 69, n=266, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼34% +247%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Cubot Pocket
UNISOC Tiger T310, PowerVR GE8300, 4096
1.1 fps ∼3%
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 3072
0.7 fps ∼2% -36%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 4096
39 fps ∼100% +3445%
realme C35
UNISOC T616, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2.2 fps ∼6% +100%
Average UNISOC Tiger T310
 
1.1 fps ∼3% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 52, n=266, last 2 years)
13.6 fps ∼35% +1136%
Cubot PocketCubot King Kong Mini 2Cubot Kingkong Minirealme C35realme C31Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-32%
-32%
215%
57%
8%
259%
Sequential Read 256KB
261.6
275.5
5%
246.9
-6%
907.1
247%
478.8
83%
273 ?(95.6 - 704, n=190)
4%
944 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=260, last 2 years)
261%
Sequential Write 256KB
186.9
137.8
-26%
129.7
-31%
271.1
45%
131.9
-29%
176.8 ?(40 - 274, n=190)
-5%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=260, last 2 years)
169%
Random Read 4KB
32.7
25.5
-22%
26.9
-18%
137.8
321%
89
172%
58.7 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=190)
80%
171.2 ?(13.5 - 345, n=260, last 2 years)
424%
Random Write 4KB
59.5
9.4
-84%
17
-71%
206.4
247%
61.5
3%
31 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=190)
-48%
167.6 ?(30.3 - 475, n=261, last 2 years)
182%

温度

Max. Load
 41.1 °C42.4 °C42.5 °C 
 41.4 °C42.3 °C42.8 °C 
 41.8 °C41.5 °C42.2 °C 
Maximum: 42.8 °C
Average: 42 °C
37.2 °C38.6 °C35.5 °C
37.2 °C39 °C36.2 °C
36.6 °C39.3 °C34.7 °C
Maximum: 39.3 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.6 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图背面
热图背面

扬声器

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.741.92535.737.33127.329.44033.332.25037.434.46325.224.18018.216.910020.520.112513.514.316017.329.320013.535.425013.542.331513.148.540012.951.550013.358.663015.462.880014.165.3100012.970.512509.672.9160010.671.4200010.369.525001169315012.666.6400015.265.7500016.868.3630016.463.7800016.553.91000016.650.81250015.957.21600016.654.8SPL26.380.1N0.742.7median 13.5median 58.6Delta1.911.632.827.426.227.423.322.921.9252825.819.924.419.125.519.928.616.53919.64917.549.317.54813.951.513.952.815.858.815.260.71466.31468.613.97213.473.913.874.614.375.91477.114.576.914.677.914.57614.772.615.166.51558.314.847.126.586.40.862.5median 14.6median 66.3112.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCubot PocketApple iPhone SE 2020
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot Pocket audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone SE 2020 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Cubot King Kong Mini 2
3000 mAh
1072 min ∼41% +8%
Cubot Pocket
3000 mAh
994 min ∼38%
realme C35
5000 mAh
958 min ∼36% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (424 - 1953, n=268, last 2 years)
907 min ∼34% -9%
Apple iPhone SE 2022
2018 mAh
769 min ∼29% -23%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 34min

Pros

+ 非常方便
+ 设计精良
+ 用于移动支付的NFC
+ 屏幕明亮,没有蓝光

Cons

- 屏幕边缘较厚
- 负载下明显发热
- 相机很快就会过度消耗
- 蹩脚的内存
- 中等的价格-性能比

评语。无与伦比的紧凑尺寸,可以更便宜一些

在审查中。Cubot Pocket。
在审查中。Cubot Pocket。

Cubot Pocket是一个有大问题的小设备。相比之下,Cubot Pocket的价格大幅上涨。 金刚迷你2使得它的吸引力下降,因为在其价格范围内有更强大的手机。然而,如果你正在寻找一个真正方便的手机,目前几乎没有任何替代品--甚至是一个 iPhone SE也已经大得多了。

就质量而言,Cubot Pocket的摄像头只够拍快照,但只要你没有太高的期望,通过扬声器播放音乐还是很不错的。小巧的电池可以持续很长时间,明亮的屏幕也适合在光线充足的环境中使用。Cubot实际上已经把设计处理得很好,甚至散发着某种优雅的气息。

Cubot Pocket是如此方便,以至于它几乎没有任何对手。设计是令人愉悦的,但该相机只能用于非常简单的需求。

总而言之,你可能应该考虑多投资约200欧元在一个 iPhone SE 2020如果你正在寻找一个方便的手机 Apple iPhone SE 2020 Review - Small phone with a fast-beating heart这款手机功能更强大,并保证在几年内有软件支持。

价格和可用性

在测试时,Cubot Pocket在中欧有售:amazon.de制造商的价格为169.99欧元。另外,你也可以从制造商的商店aliexpress.com上订购。从欧洲发货,可以节省几欧元。

Cubot Pocket - 07/10/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
64 / 75 → 85%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
40 / 70 → 57%
Weight
94%
Battery
91%
Display
85%
Games Performance
5 / 64 → 7%
Application Performance
63 / 86 → 73%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
56 / 90 → 62%
Camera
43%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Cubot袖珍智能手机评论。极其方便的Android ,价格低廉的手机
Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-18 (Update: 2022-07-18)