Notebookcheck

微星Cubi 5 10M与酷睿i3-10110U和27英寸显示器MD271的回顾

NUC的替代品? 微星Cubi 5 10M是一款没有太多装饰的紧凑型办公电脑。与Cubi 5 10M一起,我们还仔细观察了微星现代MD271显示器和微星现代LED Lux灯条。
Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Bade (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Desktop Mini PC MSI Monitor
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

微星为这次评测提供了一个办公室设置,包括Cubi 5 10M,27英寸微星Modern MD271显示器和一个灯条。

Cubi 5 10M是一款基于Comet Lake的迷你PC,在形状和尺寸上有点类似于英特尔NUC。我们测试设备中的SoC是英特尔酷睿i3-10110U,这是一个双核处理器,共有4个线程。安装的工作存储器是一个4GB的SO-DIMM模块,必要时可以更换或扩展。总共可以使用两个SO-DIMM模块。256GB固态硬盘提供NVMe支持,从而提供快速的读写速率。一切都安装在124 x 54 x 124(宽x高x深)毫米的小箱子里(约4.9 x 2.1 x 4.9英寸)。这意味着Cubi 5 M10与英特尔NUC 10性能套件直接相比,只是略大一些。如果安装的M.2固态硬盘对你来说太小,你可以把它换掉或在设备中安装另一个2.5英寸的驱动器。所有必要的螺丝和电缆都包括在内。在我们的测试配置中,Cubi 5 M10迷你电脑的售价略低于540欧元(约638美元)。然而,我们想强调的是,这不是一个裸机系统,这意味着没有额外的费用用于内存、大容量存储和操作系统。

微星Cubi 5 M10有六种不同的配置。你可以在这里找到一个列表https://de.msi.com/Business-Productivity-PC/Cubi-5-10M/Specification 。然而,你应该小心,因为替代选项是所谓的裸机系统。这些系统没有工作内存和大容量存储。操作系统也需要额外购买,这就推高了价格。

案例与设备

这款箱子的内部有很多塑料和金属,以保证稳定性。黑色的箱子用一些点缀物来提亮。幸运的是,没有使用钢琴烤漆表面。这些东西随着时间的推移很快就会被划伤,并使指纹很快就能看到。箱子非常坚固,在底部提供了一个维护舱口。这样你就可以快速接触到里面安装的部件。该设备也可以直接连接到显示器上,只要它有一个Vesa支架。可以安装一个可选的按钮,以便顺利打开设备。

Cubi 5 10M为外部设备提供了足够的选择。总共五个USB-A端口是足够的。不过,前面还有一个TypeC接口。外部屏幕可以通过DisplayPort或HDMI连接。

MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
MSI Cubi 5 10M
微星Cubi 5 10M (配件)
微星Cubi 5 10M (来源: MSI)
MSI Cubi 5 10M (电源)
微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代MD271QPDE
微星现代MD271QPDE
微星现代MD271QPDE
微星现代MD271QPDE与微星Cubi 5 10M和微星现代LED Lux灯条
微星现代MD271QPDE与微星Cubi 5 10M和微星现代LED Lux灯条
微星现代MD271QPDE(来源:微星)。
微星现代MD271QPDE(来源:微星)。
微星现代MD271QPDE(来源:微星)。

性能 - 没有太大的改进余地

微星Cubi 5 10M配备了 英特尔酷睿i3-10110U这对于简单的办公应用是相当足够的。其计算能力足以满足日常办公和偶尔上网的需要。然而,如果你经常在同一时间使用许多浏览器标签,安装的4GB DDR4内存可能很快达到极限。这里建议升级到8GB,这可以通过第二个模块快速完成。大多数用户应该能够应付256GB的SSD。由于支持NVMe,该固态硬盘提供了快速的数据传输率,系统很快就可以启动了。

处理器

英特尔酷睿i3-10110U提供两个原生内核,总共有四个线程。该SoC属于英特尔的Comet Lake系列,其基本时钟为2.1 GHz。根据负载情况,该SoC可以在短时间内将Turbo频率提升至4.1 GHz。作为一个双核处理器,英特尔酷睿i3-10110U只提供相对较低的性能,这也反映在基准测试中。与稍大的英特尔酷睿i5-10210U的差距是巨大的,特别是在多核基准测试中。尽管如此,微星Cubi 5 10M中的英特尔酷睿i3-10110U的性能与我们的平均速率基本持平。

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
194 Points ∼100% +20%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
168 Points ∼87% +4%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
162 Points ∼84%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (129 - 172, n=5)
159 Points ∼82% -2%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
117 Points ∼60% -28%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
108 Points ∼56% -33%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
84 Points ∼43% -48%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
77 Points ∼40% -52%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1067 Points ∼100% +238%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
790 Points ∼74% +150%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (314 - 405, n=5)
352 Points ∼33% +11%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
316 Points ∼30%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
298 Points ∼28% -6%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
261 Points ∼24% -17%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
248 Points ∼23% -22%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
220 Points ∼21% -30%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
211 (209.9min - 211.39max) Points ∼20% -33%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
2.19 Points ∼100% +17%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1.91 Points ∼87% +2%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1.87 Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
 
1.87 Points ∼85% 0%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
1.33 Points ∼61% -29%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
1.28 Points ∼58% -32%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.92 Points ∼42% -51%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
10.89 Points ∼100% +203%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8.66 Points ∼80% +141%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
3.59 Points ∼33%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
 
3.59 Points ∼33% 0%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
3.26 Points ∼30% -9%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
3.09 Points ∼28% -14%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
2.86 Points ∼26% -20%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
480 Points ∼100% +20%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
428 Points ∼89% +7%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (400 - 405, n=3)
402 Points ∼84% 0%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
401 Points ∼84%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
200 Points ∼42% -50%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
171 Points ∼36% -57%
CPU (Multi Core)
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
2303 Points ∼100% +210%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1820 Points ∼79% +145%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (743 - 928, n=3)
808 Points ∼35% +9%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
743 Points ∼32%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
556 Points ∼24% -25%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
491 Points ∼21% -34%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
2378.7 Seconds * ∼100%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (1174 - 1385, n=2)
1280 Seconds * ∼54%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
584.9 Seconds * ∼25%
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
468.3 Seconds * ∼20%
wPrime 2.10
1024m
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
731.5 s * ∼100% -35%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
620 s * ∼85% -14%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
566.005 s * ∼77% -4%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
558 s * ∼76% -3%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
543.119 s * ∼74%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (523 - 543, n=2)
533 s * ∼73% +2%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
217.837 s * ∼30% +60%
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
177.37 s * ∼24% +67%
32m
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
23.1 s * ∼100% -31%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
19.5 s * ∼84% -11%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
18 s * ∼78% -2%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
17.623 s * ∼76%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
17.366 s * ∼75% +1%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (13.9 - 17.6, n=2)
15.8 s * ∼68% +10%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6.78 s * ∼29% +62%
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
5.103 s * ∼22% +71%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0
Pass 2
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
60.55 (60.4min - 73.5max) fps ∼100% +195%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
49.35 (49.1min - 51.6max) fps ∼82% +140%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (20.6 - 20.7, n=2)
20.6 fps ∼34% 0%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
20.55 (20.4min - 20.7max) fps ∼34%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
19.3 fps ∼32% -6%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
16.75 (16.7min - 16.9max) fps ∼28% -18%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
16.46 fps ∼27% -20%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
13.75 fps ∼23% -33%
Pass 1
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
206 (204min - 208max) fps ∼100% +93%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
184.5 (184min - 186max) fps ∼90% +73%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (107 - 114, n=2)
110 fps ∼53% +3%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
106.5 (106min - 109max) fps ∼52%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
105 fps ∼51% -1%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
88.46 fps ∼43% -17%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
78.9 (77.1min - 81.7max) fps ∼38% -26%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
74 fps ∼36% -31%
TrueCrypt
Serpent Mean 100MB
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
0.57 GB/s ∼100% +171%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
0.48 GB/s ∼84% +129%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (0.21 - 0.23, n=2)
0.22 GB/s ∼39% +5%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
0.21 GB/s ∼37%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.182 GB/s ∼32% -13%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
0.166 GB/s ∼29% -21%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
0.142 GB/s ∼25% -32%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
0.133 GB/s ∼23% -37%
Twofish Mean 100MB
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1 GB/s ∼100% +189%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
0.79 GB/s ∼79% +128%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (0.346 - 0.394, n=2)
0.37 GB/s ∼37% +7%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
0.346 GB/s ∼35%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
0.283 GB/s ∼28% -18%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
0.266 GB/s ∼27% -23%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
0.245 GB/s ∼25% -29%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
0.199 GB/s ∼20% -42%
AES Mean 100MB
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4.7 GB/s ∼100% +147%
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4.6 GB/s ∼98% +142%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (1.9 - 2.2, n=2)
2.05 GB/s ∼44% +8%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
1.9 GB/s ∼40% 0%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1.9 GB/s ∼40%
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
1.7 GB/s ∼36% -11%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
1.5 GB/s ∼32% -21%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
1.3 GB/s ∼28% -32%
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
22969 Points ∼100%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
13949 Points ∼61%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
 
8289 Points ∼36%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
5468 Points ∼24%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
5066 Points ∼22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
5271 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
 
4455 Points ∼85%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
3680 Points ∼70%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
2613 Points ∼50%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
1922 Points ∼36%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
7.95 fps ∼100%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6.28 fps ∼79%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (2.72 - 3.12, n=2)
2.92 fps ∼37%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
1.48 fps ∼19%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
0 fps ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R20

Cinebench R15多循环

在使用Cinebench R15多循环的负载测试中,Cubi 5 10M可以很好地控制英特尔酷睿i3-10110U。即使在持续负载后,冷却系统也没有过载。

0551101652202753303854404955506056607157708258809359901045313.43314.69313.77314.41312.48316.41315.64315.86314.06314.46315.61308.88315.4314.79316.24314.81314.94316.59316.99316.71317.01316.26314.73315.55316.7314.66314.56316.67314.52315.82317.27315.44315.68316.22316.02315.79316.86316.61315.26316.41314.93316.6316.38315.21315.24315.55317.09316.52316.51315.07790.62752.36753.2753.1751.74749.68752.59754.03755.16750.44755.53753.72754.87755.53755.32753.58757.15753.98754.11755.12754.22756.34752.53752.97751.55754.83754.16755.34756.06754.46753.31754.6754.66753.37756.4753.99753.1752.46751.99756.14754.4755.7753.69753.68751.88752.35754.28753.98750.44754.93756.02751.57752.6753.32754.81067.02941.4936.61918.74918.42834.01934.36945.27946.05944.47942.84948.36944.78946.25946.21949.37951.47948.72944.87936.4947.35945.96951.02948.18945.11949.01945.85954.34946.14944.24945.65942.93947.06947.71948.38947.73945.54946.77942.95947.6942.4950.14950.68946.7955.5949.74949.06939.96946.63948.25949.8950.84947.17942.06952.81Tooltip
MSI Cubi 5 10M Intel Core i3-10110U, Intel Core i3-10110U: Ø315 (308.88-317.27)
Intel NUC10i5FNK Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel Core i5-10210U: Ø755 (749.68-790.62)
Intel NUC10i7FNH Intel Core i7-10710U, Intel Core i7-10710U: Ø946 (834.01-1067.02)

系统性能

系统性能的合成基准测试清楚地显示了双核CPU的劣势。i3-10110U不再能跟上原生4核的步伐,不得不以明显的差距排在它们后面。与我们数据库中的平均性能的差距也是惊人的。我们怀疑这其中的原因是工作内存紧张。微星Cubi 5 10M在负载下和播放4K视频材料时的测量延迟方面表现令人惊讶。我们曾假设这里的延迟会高得多。Cubi 5 10M显然在与英特尔NUC的比较中获胜。然而,播放高分辨率的视频材料对迷你PC的性能要求很高。应该给SoC几秒钟的缓冲时间。在这之后,就可以顺利播放了。

打开多个浏览器标签和播放4K视频时的最大延迟。
打开多个浏览器标签和播放4K视频时的最大延迟。
按最长的执行时间排列的驱动程序
按最长的执行时间排列的驱动程序
Prime95十秒后的最大延时
Prime95十秒后的最大延时
PCMark 10
Score
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4418 Points ∼100% +49%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
4019 Points ∼91% +36%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (2958 - 3542, n=3)
3287 Points ∼74% +11%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
2958 Points ∼67%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
2391 Points ∼54% -19%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
1806 Points ∼41% -39%
Productivity
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6876 Points ∼100% +27%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6494 Points ∼94% +20%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (5397 - 6758, n=3)
6046 Points ∼88% +12%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
5397 Points ∼78%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
4084 Points ∼59% -24%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
2928 Points ∼43% -46%
Essentials
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
9013 Points ∼100% +45%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
8235 Points ∼91% +33%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (6210 - 7583, n=3)
6998 Points ∼78% +13%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
6210 Points ∼69%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
5419 Points ∼60% -13%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
4693 Points ∼52% -24%
Digital Content Creation
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
3777 Points ∼100% +80%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
3296 Points ∼87% +57%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (2097 - 2390, n=3)
2274 Points ∼60% +8%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
2097 Points ∼56%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
1677 Points ∼44% -20%
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
1165 Points ∼31% -44%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
AC6-M Mini-PC, Intel Celeron J4125
2000, Intel UHD Graphics 600
3767.3 μs * ∼100% -138%
Average Intel Core i3-10110U
  (1581 - 5347, n=3)
3169 μs * ∼84% -100%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1581.3 μs * ∼42%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

CrystalDiskInfo
CrystalDiskInfo

我们的测试系统配备了一个256GB的固态硬盘。这也包含了操作系统,这意味着用户有将近220GB的可用空间。使用的SSD是西数公司的M.2-2280格式的快速NVMe SSD。在测试中,该固态硬盘以非常好的读取率给人留下了深刻的印象,尽管写入率可能会更好一些。底线是,对于一台简单的办公电脑来说,其性能是绰绰有余的。第二个2.5英寸格式的数据介质仍然可以存放在机箱内。所有必要的连接线都包括在交货范围内。

AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3
CrystalDiskMark 3
CrystalDiskMark 5
CrystalDiskMark 5
CrystalDiskMark 6
CrystalDiskMark 6

图形卡

英特尔UHD Graphics 620是众所周知的。然而,英特尔酷睿i3-10110U只提供24个EU中的23个,这也可以从性能中看出。此外,我们的测试样本只适用于一个RAM模块,这意味着额外的性能会损失。第二个RAM模块仍然可以提供一个小的性能提升。尽管如此,不应期待有什么奇迹发生。然而,微星Cube 5 10M不适合用于游戏。只有非常简单的休闲游戏可以期待办公室的奴隶。

更多关于英特尔UHD Graphics 620的基准测试可以找到这里.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
2322 Points ∼100% +76%
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1983 Points ∼85% +51%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1853 Points ∼80% +41%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1144 - 2006, n=240)
1741 Points ∼75% +32%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
1458 Points ∼63% +11%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1316 Points ∼57%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
1175 Points ∼51% -11%
3DMark
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
79747 Points ∼100% +94%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (13790 - 102010, n=65)
68085 Points ∼85% +66%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
61979 Points ∼78% +51%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
58199 Points ∼73% +42%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
41037 Points ∼51%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
48446 Points ∼100% +83%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (26409 - 59483, n=70)
43034 Points ∼89% +63%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
40670 Points ∼84% +54%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
40532 Points ∼84% +53%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
26409 Points ∼55%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Intel NUC6i5SYH, Intel Core i5-6260U
1800, Intel Iris Graphics 540
1479 Points ∼100% +92%
Intel NUC10i7FNH, Intel Core i7-10710U
1100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1418 Points ∼96% +84%
Intel NUC10i5FNK, Intel Core i5-10210U
1600, Intel UHD Graphics 620
1202 Points ∼81% +56%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1444, n=209)
1153 Points ∼78% +49%
Intel NUC5i5RYH, Intel Core i5-5250U
1600, Intel HD Graphics 6000
1033 Points ∼70% +34%
MSI Cubi 5 10M, Intel Core i3-10110U
2100, Intel UHD Graphics 620
772 Points ∼52%
Intel NUC5i3RYK, Intel Core i3-5010U
2100, Intel HD Graphics 5500
770 Points ∼52% 0%
3DMark 11 Performance
1395 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
39769 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5358 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
725 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
342 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
708 points
Help

排放与能源

温度

首先,我们可以声明,Cubi 5 10M在安装硬件时没有任何温度问题。外壳只有在负载下才会轻微发热。在Prime95和FurMark的压力测试中,SoC不会变得非常热,最高温度为68℃(154.4°F)。功率限制在这里相当适用,这使SoC的速度稍稍减慢。当CPU和iGPU同时加载时,1.1 GHz的基本时钟无法维持。众所周知,这在Core i3-10110U中是2.1GHz。压力测试并没有对性能产生可持续的影响。3DMark11基准测试的结果与冷启动时相比处于同一水平。我们已经可以在Cinebench R15多循环中确定这一点。在这里,CPU的性能在所有50次运行中也几乎保持不变。

压力测试。FurMark+Prime95
压力测试。FurMark+Prime95
压力测试后的3DMark 11
压力测试后的3DMark 11
发热的顶面(负载)
发热的顶面(负载)
发热电源(负载)
发热电源(负载)

噪声排放

一台办公电脑应该是安静的,高于一切。微星Cubi 5 M10正好可以做到这一点。当空转时,我们测量了30.91 dB(A),这只比在完全安静的房间里(30.5 dB(A))多一点。然而,当我们单独运行Prime95作为压力测试时,明显较高的噪音负荷是明显的。在这里,SoC可以使用其所有的功率,这意味着由于热量的增加,冷却装置也必须更努力地工作。如果同时运行Prime95和FurMark两个应用程序,SoC就不能再使用全部性能,因为CPU和iGPU必须分享15瓦的TDP。在32 dB(A)的情况下,Cubi 5 10M的噪音明显降低,尽管最高35 dB(A)也不被认为是令人讨厌的。风扇是温和的上下调节,不产生任何高频噪音。

噪声排放(空转)
噪声排放(空转)
噪声排放(压力测试:Prime95)。
噪声排放(压力测试:Prime95)。
噪声排放(压力测试:FurMark+Prime95
噪声排放(压力测试:FurMark+Prime95

能源消耗

小巧的Cubi 5 10 M由于其节俭的组件,在能源消耗方面可以得分。仪表只显示我们在空闲时的8瓦。尽管如此,在满负荷的情况下,它的平均功率可以达到46瓦。电源必须提供最大66瓦的功率。因此,它的尺寸仍然足够大,有65瓦。

能源消耗被关闭
能源消耗被关闭
闲置模式下的能源消耗
闲置模式下的能源消耗
能源消耗 Cinebench R15 Multi
能源消耗 Cinebench R15 Multi
压力测试期间的能源消耗(Prime95)。
压力测试期间的能源消耗(Prime95)。
压力测试期间的能源消耗(FurMark)。
压力测试期间的能源消耗(FurMark)。
压力测试中的能耗(FurMark和Prime95)。
压力测试中的能耗(FurMark和Prime95)。
Power Consumption
1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25
MSI Cubi 5 10M
25.3 (24.8min, 25P1 - 26.3max) Watt * ∼100%
AC6-M Mini-PC
19.4 (19min, 19.1P1 - 20max) Watt * ∼77% +23%
Prime95 V28,10 Stress (external Monitor)
Intel NUC10i7FNH (Idle: 8.4 W)
60.05 (52min - 86max) Watt * ∼100% -29%
Intel NUC10i5FNK (Idle: 15.7 W)
58.55 (56min - 69max) Watt * ∼98% -25%
MSI Cubi 5 10M (Idle: 8 W)
46.72 (40min - 66max) Watt * ∼78%
AC6-M Mini-PC
17.4 (15.8min, 16.8P1 - 18max) Watt * ∼29% +63%
Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor)
MSI Cubi 5 10M (Idle: 8 W)
24.5 (9.03min, 19.9P1 - 25max) Watt * ∼100%
1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor)
Intel NUC10i7FNH (Idle: 8.4 W)
46.6 (45min - 68max) Watt * ∼100% -85%
Intel NUC10i5FNK (Idle: 15.7 W)
37.8 (35min - 63max) Watt * ∼81% -50%
MSI Cubi 5 10M (Idle: 8 W)
25.17 (25min - 26max) Watt * ∼54%

* ... smaller is better

监视器 - MD271系列为内容创造者

子像素结构
子像素结构
明显可见的混浊
明显可见的混浊

除了微星Cubi 5 10M,微星还为我们提供了新的MD271显示器。这款产品主要针对内容创作者,除了现代设计之外,还提供了WQHD分辨率和哑光IPS面板。测量的亮度为325cd/m²。这比制造商在规格表中所说的(250 cd/m²)要多。MD271的黑值是典型的IPS面板。结合亮度,这导致对比度为1,161:1。86%的照度仍然很好,尽管90%以上的数值应该是目标。毕竟,我们谈论的是一台直接针对内容创作者的显示器,他们通常对质量非常重视。尽管如此,86%的数值在日常使用中并不令人讨厌,这意味着没有明显的阴影。然而,光晕的问题,也被称为混浊,在MD271上已经是一个问题。在黑暗场景中,在屏幕的下边缘有更多明显的明亮区域。测得的响应时间很好,因此在显示器上玩一两个游戏是没有问题的。然而,由于最大的75赫兹,我们不会推荐它作为纯游戏显示器。你更应该寻找一个至少有144赫兹的好显示器。我们无法测量亮度控制中的任何PWM,这无疑是积极的。因此,疲劳的迹象较少。

296
cd/m²
307
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
280
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 325 cd/m² Average: 293.4 cd/m² Minimum: 29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Contrast: 1161:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.87 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 2.36
ΔE Greyscale 9.68 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
94.95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
MSI Cubi 5 10M
2560x1440, 27.00
Display
Display P3 Coverage
72.1
sRGB Coverage
95
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.5
Response Times
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
20 (9, 11)
Response Time Black / White *
14 (7, 7)
PWM Frequency
Screen
Brightness middle
325
Brightness
293
Brightness Distribution
86
Black Level *
0.28
Contrast
1161
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.87
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
12.26
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.36
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
9.68
Gamma
2.25 98%
CCT
8329 78%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69.51
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94.95
Total Average (Program / Settings)

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

微星现代MD271与sRGB对比(94.95%)。
微星现代MD271与sRGB对比(94.95%)。
微星现代MD271与AdobeRGB的对比(69.51%)。
微星现代MD271与AdobeRGB的对比(69.51%)。

在交付状态下,可以看到与sRGB色彩空间相比,Delta-E-2000色彩偏差明显增加。如果要追求显示器的实际用途,这里肯定要进行校准。经过手动校准后,Delta-E-2000色彩偏差明显得到了改善。然而,即使在我们校准之后,颜色仍然高于目标值3。此外,轻微的蓝色偏移也可以减少一些。在测量的色彩空间覆盖率方面,微星Modern MD271做得相当好,在sRGB中占95%,在Adobe RGB色彩空间中占近70%。因此,在半专业的图像或视频编辑方面没有任何障碍。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。

微星现代LED Lux灯条作为附件

微星现代LEDLux灯条
微星现代LEDLux灯条

通过微星Modern LED Lux Lightbar,制造商为工作站提供了一个合适的扩展,以最佳方式照亮键盘区域。在九月底之前,微星提供了购买指定微星产品的可能性,以获得Modern LED Lux Lightbar。 这里你可以找到更多的细节。.

微星也为我们提供了这个灯条。该产品看起来和感觉都非常好。Lightbar可以选择安装在许多不同的显示器上。为此,Lightbar被放置在显示器的顶部,并通过一个弹簧式的对应装置固定在显示器上。电源是通过USB供应的。您可以使用带有USB-A端口的常规电源,或者直接使用显示器(如果它有USB端口)。包括一条相应的连接线(USB-A到USB-C)。

我们可以说,Modern LED Lux Lightbar在测试中以令人愉快的光线说服了我们。工作场所照明良好,即使在完全黑暗的环境中也能很好地工作。在灯光颜色方面,可以选择暖白或冷白。也可以将这两者结合起来。在我们看来,后者提供了最好的选择。同样,现代LED Lux灯条的亮度也可以连续调整。强度和光色可以通过前面的触摸感应表面来选择。

Pros

+ 坚固的外壳
+ 非常节省空间
+ 低功率消耗
+ 多种连接方式
+ 发热量低
+ 外部开机按钮
+ 可立即投入使用 - 供货中包括内存、SSD和Win 10 Pro

Cons

- 只有2个内核和4个线程
- 低工作内存(4GB
- 只有WiFi 5

结论 - 小型办公电脑,坚实的显示器和有用的灯条

微星Cubi 5 M10,由德国微星公司提供
微星Cubi 5 M10,由德国微星公司提供
微星现代MD271 27英寸显示器,由德国微星公司提供
微星现代MD271 27英寸显示器,由德国微星公司提供
微星现代LED Lux灯条,由德国微星公司提供
微星现代LED Lux灯条,由德国微星公司提供

微星Cubi 5 10M是一台小型的办公电脑,但仅此而已。英特尔酷睿i3-10110U作为一个系统芯片,足以满足日常办公和网络浏览。你可以接受工作内存,尽管安装的4GB应该是当今工作电脑的最低限度。8GB的选择并不昂贵,而且可以在短时间内完成。该系统在大容量存储方面的得分更高。在这里,NVMe固态硬盘可以用稳定的性能来说服人。考虑到所安装的组件,一个SATA固态硬盘也可以做到这一点。价格差异可能并不明显。那么为什么不安装更好的产品呢?感谢微星!

微星Cubi 5 M10是一款紧凑型办公电脑。如果你能接受它的弱点,你会得到一台成熟的PC,没有隐藏的额外费用。

从外观上看,该设备相当不显眼,在桌面上有一个很好的形象。然而,人们可以考虑开发一个有点扁平的Cubi 5 10M的版本。英特尔已经在他们的NUC系列中这样做了几年。一个复杂的设计应该仍然能够容纳两个大容量存储设备。它不一定非得是2.5英寸的驱动器。Cubi 5 10M的性能是你根据技术规格所期望的。如果你将Cubi 5 M10直接安装在显示器的VESA支架上,外部启动按钮是一个有用的功能。

微星Cubi 5 10M目前在亚马逊上的售价略低于560欧元(约661美元)。

微星Modern MD271 27英寸显示器在视觉上很现代,提供了良好的设备。测量的亮度高于制造商的规格,这绝对值得称赞。尽管如此,Delta E-2000的颜色偏差在交付状态下太高了。如果显示器要像宣传的那样用于内容创作,你在这里是绕不开校准的。微星现代LED Lux灯条是一个非常有用的功能。它为键盘周围的工作区提供了愉快的照明。而那些在9月底之前购买指定的微星产品的人可以获得它。有关该促销活动的更多信息可以在这里找到https://de.msi.com/Promotion/modern-reddot.

价格和可用性

微星Cubi 5 10M目前在亚马逊上有售。售价630欧元(约合人民币744元)。

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 196077 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18074 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微星Cubi 5 10M与酷睿i3-10110U和27英寸显示器MD271的回顾
Sebastian Bade, 2021-09- 1 (Update: 2021-09- 2)