Notebookcheck

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro在审查。适合基本任务的低价15英寸笔记本电脑

酷睿i3为500欧元。 通过F15 Pro,中国制造商Teclast提供了一款15英寸的笔记本电脑,采用铝制外壳和英特尔的Core i3处理器。还有足够的端口和一个IPS显示屏。对于大约500欧元(约合588美元),你还能期待什么?
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Ice Lake Laptop / Notebook Windows
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Processor
Intel Core i3-1005G1 2 x 1.2 - 3.4 GHz, 34 W PL2 / Short Burst, 15 W PL1 / Sustained, Ice Lake U
Graphics adapter
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
Memory
12288 MB 
, LPDDR4-3200, Dual-Channel, soldered
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, N156HCA-EN1, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Storage
Teclast BD256GB, 256 GB 
, 187 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10MBit/s), Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 374 x 243
Battery
53.8 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 57W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.945 kg, Power Supply: 278 g
Price
500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
09/2021
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
1.9 kg20.5 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
03/2020
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
R5 3500U, Vega 8
1.5 kg16.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
77 %
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Athlon 3150U, Vega 3
1.9 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
78 %
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
1.6 kg17.9 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳、设备和输入装置

Teclast使用铝(盖子)和塑料的混合材料制作深灰色的外壳。稳定性尚可,整体制造质量符合这一价格范围的预期,但其他制造商也在这一价格范围内提供更高质量的外壳(如Chuwi、华为)。然而,铰链调整得不好,因为它明显摇晃。黑色的键盘没有照明,击键的声音相当大。我们喜欢这个大的ClickPad,操作起来没有问题。

你得到一个USB-C接口,但它不能用于充电(也没有DisplayPort)。否则,有两个USB端口(3.2 Gen.1)和一个成熟的HDMI输出。microSD读卡器非常慢,RealTek WLAN模块(802.11ac 1x1 & BT 5.0)也是如此。

黑色的键盘提供了足够的行程,但由于敲击声很大,看起来不是特别高质量。没有背光,但专用数字键盘很实用。大型ClickPad工作良好,但响亮的点击声在这里也很烦人。

Rating,Rating Version,Date,Model,Weight,Drive,Size,Resolution,Price from Size comparison

374 mm 243 mm 20.5 mm 1.9 kg362 mm 252 mm 20 mm 1.9 kg357.8 mm 229.9 mm 16.9 mm 1.5 kg356.1 mm 234.5 mm 17.9 mm 1.6 kg
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Office
  (17.7 - 194, n=85, last 2 years)
68.8 MB/s ∼100% +232%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28 MB/s ∼41% +35%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
  (AV Pro v60)
20.7 MB/s ∼30%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
19.5 MB/s ∼28% -6%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Office
  (17.2 - 201, n=83, last 2 years)
79.1 MB/s ∼100% +180%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
37.4 MB/s ∼47% +33%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
  (AV Pro v60)
28.2 MB/s ∼36%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
26.29 MB/s ∼33% -7%
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1224 (586min - 1492max) MBit/s ∼100% +367%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
690 (335min - 729max) MBit/s ∼56% +163%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
618 (579min - 655max) MBit/s ∼50% +136%
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
  (54.8 - 339, n=20)
278 MBit/s ∼23% +6%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
262 (240min - 277max) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1429 (730min - 1491max) MBit/s ∼100% +500%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
653 (593min - 667max) MBit/s ∼46% +174%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
622 (585min - 651max) MBit/s ∼44% +161%
Average Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
  (86 - 335, n=20)
266 MBit/s ∼19% +12%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Realtek 8821CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
238 (207min - 270max) MBit/s ∼17%
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255270207246270238249243239259242259238231248237255253246224238234238218235241224209231221227231207246270238249243239259242259238231248237255253246224238234238218235241224209231221227231260258249265252240255250276262255269277258271273266272263247272250272268256276263264258263Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø238 (207-270)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø262 (240-277)
ColorChecker
26 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro: 18.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 28.76 ∆E

显示屏 - 1080p IPS面板

子像素排列
子像素排列

15.6英寸的IPS显示屏提供全高清分辨率,并有一个光泽的表面。这在户外是有问题的,但至少面板的主观画面印象是好的,颜色也看起来很生动。

平均亮度约为260cd/m²,对比度甚至达到了非常好的1400:1。然而,最低亮度有点问题,为77cd/m²,这在非常黑暗的环境中太高了。我们无法检测到PWM闪烁,光晕也不是一个问题。

由于几乎完整的sRGB,该面板在出厂前已经被很好地校准,甚至编辑图片/视频也是合理的。IPS显示屏的可视角度稳定性很好。

267
cd/m²
281
cd/m²
269
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
254
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
N156HCA-EN1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 293 cd/m² Average: 266.3 cd/m² Minimum: 77 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 294 cd/m²
Contrast: 1395:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
67.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
N156HCA-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AU Optronics AUO28ED, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Chi Mei CMN15F5, TN, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
BOE NV15N3D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-38%
-43%
-40%
Display P3 Coverage
65.6
40.49
-38%
37.13
-43%
39.42
-40%
sRGB Coverage
98.1
60.89
-38%
55.78
-43%
58.66
-40%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.8
41.84
-38%
38.36
-43%
40.73
-40%
Response Times
-13%
41%
-26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.6 (20.4, 19.2)
43.6 (20.4, 23.2)
-10%
26 (8, 18)
34%
45.6 (23.6, 22)
-15%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 (16, 10.8)
31.2 (18, 13.2)
-16%
14 (4, 3)
48%
36.4 (20.4, 16)
-36%
PWM Frequency
1020 (98)
Screen
-98%
-105%
-128%
Brightness middle
293
271
-8%
232
-21%
233.1
-20%
Brightness
266
256
-4%
211
-21%
226
-15%
Brightness Distribution
84
90
7%
82
-2%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.21
0.15
29%
0.41
-95%
0.21
-0%
Contrast
1395
1807
30%
566
-59%
1110
-20%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.1
4.7
-124%
6.83
-225%
5.69
-171%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5
20.4
-308%
18.77
-275%
20.62
-312%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.7
4.6
-557%
5.12
-631%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
1.6
54%
8.52
-143%
3.3
6%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.17 101%
2.45 90%
2.35 94%
CCT
6681 97%
6649 98%
9753 67%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
38.5
35
37.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60.6
56
58
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-50% / -73%
-36% / -68%
-65% / -95%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 19.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 16924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

截图CalMAN测量

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能、排放和电池寿命

HWiNFO
HWiNFO

笔记本电脑 英特尔酷睿i3-1005G1仍然来自Ice Lake ,提供2个核心(4个线程),最大时钟为3.4GHz。TDP非常短暂地达到34瓦,然后立即下降到15瓦。因此,对于2021年来说,性能是非常弱的。由于采用了M.2固态硬盘(SATA-III),主观操作也很流畅。F15 Pro几乎不适合游戏,但来自英特尔的集成GPU可以轻松应对视频播放(甚至4K)等日常事务。然而,扬声器低于平均水平,我们建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。

有一个风扇,但即使在负载情况下,你也很难听到它。反过来,负载下的表面温度相当高,但在日常使用中没有问题。

闲置消耗有点高,你也不应该在电池寿命方面期望太多;我们在亮度为150cd/m²的WLAN测试中只运行了不到6小时。

Cinebench R15 Multi Endurance test

03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665346.03338.64336.14337.39338.04339337.38338.47337.16334.54335.39338.35337.01337.49337.02338.91337.53338.89337.79338.34337.05338.38337.44336.83337.57672.62662.73667.6668.67667.42667.94667.94668.57667.95667.9668.39668.83668.99667.79668.72667.45668.86667.78668.27668.28667.41667.47669.08668.95669.28668.65668.47668.42668.97669.01668.64670.27668.8668.39668.91667.52668.21670.47668.55667.35669.05669.42668.82667.59668.95669.51670.06669.09669.02669.49349.21345.78346.92345.68348.95348.26351.94350.61347.02351.95351.33351.88348.25347348.46348.97332.02341.34347.2352.17349.56349.66349.75348.69348.83384.71379.01379.36377.46379.3378.91380.31379.25380.6378.91380.03378.85378.13379.08379.19379.24378.46379.3380.6379.81379.92377.68377.73378.63378.57375.47378.46378.74377.62379.3380.31378.86377.29377.57377.29379.08376.41378.4377.68379.98377.79377.29379.86379.36378.52378.18378.91378.69377.4378.52Tooltip
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro Intel Core i3-1005G1: Ø338 (334.54-346.03)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø669 (662.73-672.62)
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE AMD Athlon Gold 3150U: Ø348 (332.02-352.17)
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 Intel Core i3-1115G4: Ø379 (375.47-384.71)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Office
  (943 - 9653, n=41, last 2 years)
5121 Points ∼100% +140%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (2135 - 2636, n=2)
2386 Points ∼47% +12%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2135 Points ∼42%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Office
  (208 - 1578, n=41, last 2 years)
1237 Points ∼100% +18%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (1046 - 1061, n=2)
1054 Points ∼85% +1%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1046 Points ∼85%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Office
  (159 - 3672, n=121, last 2 years)
1720 Points ∼100% +110%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
1525 Points ∼89% +86%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
961 Points ∼56% +17%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (820 - 1015, n=5)
907 Points ∼53% +11%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
820 Points ∼48%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
795 Points ∼46% -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
504 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Office
  (191 - 606, n=120, last 2 years)
447 Points ∼89% +11%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
402 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (338 - 407, n=5)
391 Points ∼78% -3%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
364 Points ∼72% -9%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
303 Points ∼60% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Office
  (134 - 1614, n=127, last 2 years)
739 Points ∼100% +114%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
677.84 (671.21min - 677.84max) Points ∼92% +96%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (346 - 407, n=5)
394 Points ∼53% +14%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
384.71 (375.47min - 384.71max) Points ∼52% +11%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
352 (332.02min - 352.17max) Points ∼48% +2%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
346 (334.54min - 346.03max) Points ∼47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
193.55 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Office
  (75 - 230, n=123, last 2 years)
175 Points ∼90% +13%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
155 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (148 - 158, n=5)
155 Points ∼80% 0%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
144.02 Points ∼74% -7%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
117 Points ∼60% -25%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1388 Seconds * ∼100%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
1348 Seconds * ∼97% +3%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (1123 - 1388, n=5)
1206 Seconds * ∼87% +13%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
1188 Seconds * ∼86% +14%
Average of class Office
  (302 - 3319, n=112, last 2 years)
796 Seconds * ∼57% +43%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
680 Seconds * ∼49% +51%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Office
  (4963 - 43914, n=112, last 2 years)
20721 MIPS ∼100% +113%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
16901 MIPS ∼82% +74%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
11122 MIPS ∼54% +14%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (9731 - 11135, n=5)
10648 MIPS ∼51% +9%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
9731 MIPS ∼47%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
8752 MIPS ∼42% -10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
4621 MIPS ∼100% +20%
Average of class Office
  (2389 - 5565, n=112, last 2 years)
4434 MIPS ∼96% +15%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (3851 - 4057, n=5)
3960 MIPS ∼86% +3%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
3862 MIPS ∼84%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
3536 MIPS ∼77% -8%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
3065 MIPS ∼66% -21%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Office
  (873 - 6502, n=108, last 2 years)
3970 Points ∼100% +53%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
3157 Points ∼80% +22%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2591 Points ∼65%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
2427 Points ∼61% -6%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (2153 - 2591, n=4)
2399 Points ∼60% -7%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
1847 Points ∼47% -29%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
1337 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Office
  (431 - 1648, n=108, last 2 years)
1170 Points ∼88% +1%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
1158 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (1118 - 1161, n=4)
1145 Points ∼86% -1%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
895 Points ∼67% -23%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
751 Points ∼56% -35%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Office
  (1.15 - 11.1, n=111, last 2 years)
5.51 fps ∼100% +128%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
4.14 fps ∼75% +71%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
3.25 fps ∼59% +34%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (2.42 - 3.59, n=5)
3.23 fps ∼59% +33%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
2.42 fps ∼44%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
2.03 fps ∼37% -16%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
90.8 s * ∼100% -11%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
81.7 s * ∼90%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (55.8 - 81.7, n=4)
64.5 s * ∼71% +21%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
62.8 s * ∼69% +23%
Average of class Office
  (21.5 - 180, n=101, last 2 years)
61.3 s * ∼68% +25%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
0.872 sec * ∼100% -14%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel Core i3-1005G1
0.762 sec * ∼87%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1
  (0.747 - 0.763, n=4)
0.757 sec * ∼87% +1%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
0.745 sec * ∼85% +2%
Average of class Office
  (0.542 - 1.578, n=106, last 2 years)
0.692 sec * ∼79% +9%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel Core i3-1115G4
0.655 sec * ∼75% +14%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Office
  (1900 - 5690, n=118, last 2 years)
4319 Points ∼100% +25%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G
3898 Points ∼90% +13%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
3743 Points ∼87% +9%
Average Intel Core i3-1005G1, Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
  (3420 - 3562, n=5)
3460 Points ∼80% 0%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
3449 Points ∼80%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Vega 3, Athlon 3150U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G
3107 Points ∼72% -10%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Vega 3, Athlon 3150U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G
2838 μs * ∼100% -124%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, i3-1115G4, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G
1531.68 μs * ∼54% -21%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), i3-1005G1, Teclast BD256GB
1268.4 μs * ∼45%

* ... smaller is better

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Teclast BD256GB
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-265G
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNS128G
Average Teclast BD256GB
 
Average of class Office
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
182%
98%
38%
0%
160%
Write 4K
109.36
134.8
23%
124.8
14%
138.5
27%
109
0%
142 (19.7 - 314, n=114, last 2 years)
30%
Read 4K
38.89
41.68
7%
43.56
12%
41.98
8%
38.9
0%
47.6 (10.5 - 87.6, n=114, last 2 years)
22%
Write Seq
405.24
1651
307%
976.7
141%
213.5
-47%
405
0%
1474 (137 - 5205, n=110, last 2 years)
264%
Read Seq
528.53
2300
335%
1685
219%
1289
144%
529
0%
1651 (303 - 4340, n=110, last 2 years)
212%
Write 4K Q32T1
284.18
260
-9%
185.9
-35%
157.8
-44%
284
0%
409 (41.5 - 846, n=114, last 2 years)
44%
Read 4K Q32T1
337.77
335.1
-1%
272.7
-19%
448.9
33%
338
0%
433 (48.2 - 925, n=114, last 2 years)
28%
Write Seq Q32T1
436.5
1641
276%
970.9
122%
210.5
-52%
437
0%
1801 (138 - 5189, n=114, last 2 years)
313%
Read Seq Q32T1
559.8
3452
517%
2424
333%
1853
231%
560
0%
2600 (213 - 6921, n=114, last 2 years)
364%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Office
  (449 - 8114, n=115, last 2 years)
2641 Points ∼100% +73%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
2557 Points ∼97% +67%
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Intel Core i3-1115G4
2250 Points ∼85% +47%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel Core i3-1005G1
1530 Points ∼58%
Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
  (960 - 1755, n=13)
1494 Points ∼57% -2%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3, AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
1298 Points ∼49% -15%
low med. high ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 30.2 19.6 10.3 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 76.7 31.9 20.9 19.4 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 15.4 7.68 7.68 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 28.1 13.7 12.9 fps

噪声排放

Noise Level

Idle
24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A)
Load
24.2 / 25.3 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.2 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.236.22534.335.1313025.24027.330.85029.626.66323.224.78020.224.410019.620.612521.3201601817.320017.218.225018.318.931515.116.240013.314.950012.314.763012.714.480011.113.2100011.513.2125010.813.2160011.212.9200011.312.4250011.212.5315011.512.540001212.4500012.112.5630012.212.7800012.212.81000012.312.71250012.112.51600011.712.1SPL24.225.3N0.60.7median 12.2median 13.2Delta2.51.5hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseTeclast TBOLT F15 Pro

温度

CPU和iGPU数据压力测试
CPU和iGPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 43.1 °C39.1 °C25.1 °C 
 42.7 °C34.1 °C24.8 °C 
 37.1 °C30.6 °C23.9 °C 
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 33.4 °C
25.1 °C39 °C51.8 °C
25.2 °C33.5 °C43.1 °C
25.5 °C31.3 °C38.2 °C
Maximum: 51.8 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.8 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.5 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.1 °C / 98.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶面
表面温度应力测试(顶面
表面温度应力测试(底面
表面温度应力测试(底面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.236.72534.334.3313031.14027.333.95029.635.26323.233.78020.230.810019.632.512521.334.41601835.520017.239.625018.342.231515.147.840013.352.650012.357.963012.760.980011.167100011.569.5125010.876.1160011.270.8200011.369.4250011.266315011.566.640001265.4500012.168.6630012.272.7800012.271.61000012.360.91250012.149.31600011.744.3SPL24.281.8N0.649.3median 12.2median 60.9Delta2.512.433.836.5272732.230.129.830.534.233.625.52523.525.827.62926.328.527.539.424.7492450.721.755.621.258.620.758.619.757.618.66118.561.617.461.916.859.616.656.715.958.815.657.915.455.515.655.415.654.415.549.815.541.715.441.715.242.229.670.21.326.5median 17.4median 55.53.46.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast TBOLT F15 ProHuawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 21%, worst was 51%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源消耗

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.52 / 0.74 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.3 / 9.9 / 10.9 Watt
Load midlight 22 / 38 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Energy consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0510152025303521.723.724.924.822.323.924.22620.622.822.520.420.42321.720.521.922.224.524.52422.425.124.623.82425.520.321.52520.824.82122.725.522.818.9212525.119.621.721.620.625.120.426.926.924.724.424.123.223.322.223.522.722.120.5222024.322.822.524.322.121.821.519.525.12421.324.425.724.621.522.321.42326.522.625.12524.223.323.422.622.623.823.42223.823.127.323.525.923.325.624.520.822.620.924.924.223.422.92323.323.72320.423.122.823.122.421.524.321.525.723.222.420.323.922.725.919.419.520.721.621.627.523.225.922.924.727.6262624.32424.123.721.423.620.323.822.921.721.622.219.525.421.124.523.127.62524.422.423.824.124.627.223.827.624.822.526.226.522.324.423.822.623.922.424.621.323.722.22526.426.222.921.422.927.224.821.723.724.924.822.323.924.22620.622.822.520.420.42321.720.521.922.224.524.52422.425.124.623.82425.520.321.52520.824.82122.725.522.818.9212525.119.621.721.620.625.120.426.926.924.724.424.123.223.322.223.522.722.120.5222024.322.822.524.322.121.821.519.525.12421.324.425.724.621.522.321.42326.522.625.12524.223.323.422.622.623.823.42223.823.127.323.525.923.325.624.520.822.620.924.924.223.422.92323.323.72320.423.122.823.122.421.524.321.525.723.222.420.323.922.725.919.419.520.721.621.627.523.225.922.924.727.6262624.32424.123.721.423.620.323.822.921.721.622.219.525.421.124.523.127.62524.422.423.824.124.627.223.827.624.822.526.226.522.324.423.822.623.922.424.621.323.722.22526.426.222.921.422.927.224.838.138.1383838383837.931.926.426.426.726.926.72727.227.227.32727.427.327.527.627.727.627.627.527.527.527.527.527.727.827.627.627.627.62827.727.727.927.72827.827.727.727.927.827.727.727.627.927.927.827.727.827.927.72827.827.727.827.727.927.727.727.727.727.6282827.727.927.827.827.827.827.727.727.527.827.827.827.727.727.827.828.12827.727.727.62827.927.727.727.627.827.727.82827.8282827.827.827.727.927.927.627.72827.827.527.927.527.827.616.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.1161616.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.11615.916.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.116.11616.116.11616.11616.1161616.116.11616161616.116.11615.9161616.116.116161616Tooltip
; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø23.3 (18.9-27.6)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø23.8 (15.9-38.1)

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502
i3-1115G4, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 53 Wh
539 min ∼20% +53%
Average of class Office
  (241 - 1124, n=120, last 2 years)
520 min ∼20% +47%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010TUY
R5 3500U, Vega 8, 42 Wh
470 min ∼18% +33%
Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro
i3-1005G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 53.8 Wh
353 min ∼13%
Lenovo V15-ADA 82C7009SGE
Athlon 3150U, Vega 3, 35 Wh
241 min ∼9% -32%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 93)
5h 53min

Pros

+ 具有良好视角稳定性的IPS显示屏
+ 准确的色彩和全sRGB覆盖
+ 适当的系统性能
+ 几乎总是无声运行

Cons

- 老旧的双核处理器
- 缓慢的WLAN
- 不能通过USB-C充电
- 没有键盘背光灯

结论 - 只有IPS显示屏令人信服

在审查中。Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro。测试设备由Teclast提供
在审查中。Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro。测试设备由Teclast提供

当然,你必须问自己,你能从一台不到500欧元(约588美元)的新笔记本电脑中期待什么。Teclast F15 Pro在测试中没有表现出任何巨大的弱点,尤其是色彩强烈的IPS显示屏可以得分,它甚至可以提供完整的sRGB覆盖。在这个价格范围内,这绝不是一个理所当然的事情。

然而,我们在其他方面的表现则处于较低的边缘。除了缓慢的双核处理器,在端口和通信模块方面也没有亮点。

Teclast F15 Pro满足了基本要求,并提供了一个体面的IPS显示屏,但总的来说,即使在这个价格范围内,在竞争中也有更好的整体包装。

当你看一下竞争对手时,问题就来了。例如,有 华为MateBook D 15它以较低的价格(目前约为450欧元/~529美元)提供了更好的整体包装,这取决于配置。

Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro - 09/14/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
65 / 98 → 67%
Keyboard
72%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
41 / 80 → 52%
Weight
64 / 20-75 → 79%
Battery
68%
Display
82%
Games Performance
54 / 78 → 69%
Application Performance
80 / 95 → 84%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
71%
Camera
25 / 85 → 30%
Average
68%
77%
Office - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 200264 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18103 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Teclast TBOLT F15 Pro在审查。适合基本任务的低价15英寸笔记本电脑
Andreas Osthoff, 2021-09-17 (Update: 2021-09-17)