Notebookcheck

诺基亚XR20智能手机评测。带有优雅外壳的防水手机

留下了良好的印象。 通过诺基亚XR20,芬兰人打算推出一款既结实又好看的坚固型手机。此外,该公司希望在提供大量性能的同时,仍然保持手机的价格。诺基亚是否承担了太多?
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM 5G Smartphone
诺基亚XR20

坚固耐用的手机通常会有一些妥协。防尘、防水和防摔的代价通常是笨重的外壳、弱小的SoC,或者与你得到的功能相比,只是花了很多钱。

诺基亚现在推出了一个新的挑战者,想要解决这个问题。诺基亚XR20应该能提供良好的性能率、体面的功能和优雅的外壳,64GB版本可以以低于500欧元(约590美元)的价格购买。

在我们的评论中,我们仔细观察了该设备,我们还想找出与诺基亚X20 ,即XR20的非防水对应产品相比,差异在哪里。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Nokia XR20
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / 55
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 115 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (shared, up to 512 GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B20/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B43/​B66), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n28/​n41/​n66/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.6 x 171.6 x 81.5
Battery
4630 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 18-watt charging (USB), 15-watt charging (Qi)
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48.0 MP f/​1.79, phase-comparison AF, dual-LED flash, videos @1080p/​60fps (camera 1); 13.0 MP, f/​2.4, wide-angle lens (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, IP68-certified, MIL-STD-810H-certified; SAR: 1.133 W/​kg (head), 1.427 W/​kg (body), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
248 g
Price
579 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
09/2021
Nokia XR20
SD 480, Adreno 619
248 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
78 %
03/2020
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3
218 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.30"2340x1080
82 %
03/2021
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4
273 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.36"2300x1080
78 %
08/2020
CAT S62 Pro
SD 660, Adreno 512
248 g128 GB eMMC Flash5.70"2160x1080
81 %
05/2021
Nokia X20
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

外壳 - 保护良好的大猩猩玻璃Victus

诺基亚XR20拥有6.67英寸的显示屏和10.6毫米的厚度,并不是一款精致的设备。然而,如果你把它与其他具有防水和防尘功能的智能手机相比,诺基亚手机看起来更苗条,更有吸引力。扁平的边缘使手机壳看起来更薄,而CAT S62 ProBlackview BL6000 Pro则更显臃肿。

此外,还有灰色或蓝色的纹理背面,有轻微的光泽,以及芬兰设计师允许在侧面看到的哑光金属框架。所有这些都给人留下了整体优雅的印象,与其他制造商经常推出的笨重的、有时看起来像军用的耐用智能手机有很大不同。

这款手机的外壳得到了很好的保护。IP68表示完全安全,可以防止灰尘渗入,也可以防止长时间浸泡在淡水中。此外,还根据MIL-STD-810H标准进行了测试。显示屏周围的前挡板略微突出,这样可以进一步保护玻璃不被打破。此外,它使用大猩猩玻璃Victus,这是测试时最新版本的显示玻璃,可以处理相当多的问题。

巧妙的是,在左下角还有一个腕带的开口,这样用户就可以给智能手机提供额外的保护,防止跌落。


诺基亚XR20
诺基亚XR20
诺基亚XR20
诺基亚XR20
诺基亚XR20
诺基亚XR20

Size comparison

171.6 mm 81.5 mm 10.6 mm 248 g166.7 mm 81.3 mm 12.8 mm 273 g168.9 mm 79.7 mm 9.1 mm 220 g158.5 mm 76.7 mm 11.9 mm 248 g159.9 mm 76.7 mm 9.94 mm 218 g

连接性 - 有64或128GB的存储空间

诺基亚XR20有两种内存配置,每种都有两种颜色可供选择。

  • 诺基亚XR20 4GB内存/64GB存储 499欧元(约589美元
  • 诺基亚XR20 6GB内存/128GB存储 579欧元(约683美元

然而,在测试时,我们的测试设备在超蓝和128GB存储的情况下,在中欧有点难以得到。

可以使用双SIM卡功能,也可以使用microSD来扩展存储空间,但第二张SIM卡和microSD共享同一个插槽,所以你必须在两者之间做出决定。

由于有蓝牙5.1和NFC,也支持最新的近距离通信标准。

顶部:SIM卡插槽,紧急按钮,麦克风
顶部:SIM卡插槽,紧急按钮,麦克风
底部。 3.5毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
底部。 3.5毫米音频插孔、麦克风、USB-C端口、扬声器
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆
右边。待机按钮,音量摇杆
左:谷歌助理按钮
左:谷歌助理按钮

微型SD卡读卡器

在我们的传输测试中,诺基亚XR20的速度为22MB/s,表现一般。参考Angelbird V60 microSD的写入速度一般。诺基亚X20在CPDT中写入时速度稍快,但这两款智能手机在其他方面基本持平。

SDCardreader Transfer Speed - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
22 MB/s ∼100%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580853825.83323.337.322.829.520.625.420.418.619.517.519.124.928.435.52919.519.618.318.320.332.72023.120.219.521.628.520.424.722.618.220.718.218.720.517.418.919.123.424.733.320.219.521.625.224.621.226.329.72529.423.933.523.323.2262036.231.619.121.128.319.620.818.417.918.722.728.123.123.129.219.520.118.720.932.622.123.128.719.119.71920.924.826.518.72020.221.725.218.120.427.425.218.519.719.526.827.320.618.420.118.919.837.131.223.821.525.120.619.617.918.920.319.419.918.718.817.819.117.519.324.824.240.240.13240.236.637.540.834.433.629.637.534.633.635.636.433.731.335.835.735.433.431.832.233.319.938.633.927.435.337.134.332.135.134.335.234.533.738.733.134.929.734.237.336.435.235.636.536.333.135.336.932.830.528.635.13330.633.533.235.535.134.833.936.833.532.133.54032.834.733.23829.432.533.236.23632.33429.534.935.535.13634.935.431.639.531.73734.336.435.636.531.434.938.634.634.934.139.634.734.233.326.536.637.235.433.833.136.735.634.134.934.329.235.528.337.23628373434.833.338.233.635.13825.83323.337.322.829.520.625.420.418.619.517.519.124.928.435.52919.519.618.318.320.332.72023.120.219.521.628.520.424.722.618.220.718.218.720.517.418.919.123.424.733.320.219.521.625.224.621.226.329.72529.423.933.523.323.2262036.231.619.121.128.319.620.818.417.918.722.728.123.123.129.219.520.118.720.932.622.123.128.719.119.71920.924.826.518.72020.221.725.218.120.427.425.218.519.719.526.827.320.618.420.118.919.837.131.223.821.525.120.619.617.918.920.319.419.918.718.817.819.117.519.324.824.240.240.13240.236.637.540.834.433.629.637.534.633.635.636.433.731.335.835.735.433.431.832.233.319.938.633.927.435.337.134.332.135.134.335.234.533.738.733.134.929.734.237.336.435.235.636.536.333.135.336.932.830.528.635.13330.633.533.235.535.134.833.936.833.532.133.54032.834.733.23829.432.533.236.23632.33429.534.935.535.13634.935.431.639.531.73734.336.435.636.531.434.938.634.634.934.139.634.734.233.326.536.637.235.433.833.136.735.634.134.934.329.235.528.337.23628373434.833.338.233.635.132.779.679.57880.3788178.779.679.279.577.579.979.378.680.478.978.678.87879.978.680.278.279.378.580.179.677.779.678.280.179.178.878.97881.177.478.980.179.879.178.780.178.979.478.380.678.178.573.277.981.379.9797878.379.579.679.475.274.677.777.979.179.67681.180.975.681.178.280.279.378.678.179.178.380.67880.48077.379.278.679.677.476.983.379.977.47974.780.876.179.376.977.478.777.380.177.978.476.280.17978.579.278.378.852.151.250.350.150.34750.150.450.150.650.650.633.959.749.550.551.749.415.378.780.179.879.878.978.679.378.779.978.173.286.779.178.580.377.778.879.778.679.978.578.778.779.778.979.678.876.680.978.978.57878.97975.878.778.279.374.183.978.381.177.480.679.878.879.778.579.380.479.278.678.878.179.380.578.279.280.976.978.474.476.781.779.570.977.279.674.377.677.977.682.278.177.377.982.377.58077.877.777.678.377.879.980.378.380.880.379.278.479.680.579.175.280.281.171.474.279.775.379.577.782.279.978.779.577.979.278.679.879.977.478.261.958.751.159.857.749.559.358.742.175.758.458.459.2Tooltip
Nokia XR20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø23 (17.4-38)
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Angelbird V60: Ø34.4 (19.9-40.8)
Nokia XR20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø74.4 (32.7-83.3)
Nokia X20 Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Angelbird V60: Ø76.1 (15.3-86.7)

软件--诺基亚手机有长期更新保证

诺基亚使用Android One,这是一个非常纯粹的Android ,使其相对容易实现更新。

Android 11是开箱即预装的,幸运的是,制造商承诺三年的Android 更新;我们甚至被提到,未来会有三个Android 版本。此外,应该有四年的安全更新,这对那些想长期保留智能手机的用户来说是有利的。

这符合诺基亚的战略,即变得更加可持续。一个制造商不厌其烦地承诺长期更新的事实仍然有些不寻常,一般来说是非常受欢迎的。另一个积极的方面是,在测试时,安全补丁是从2021年8月开始的,因此是完全最新的。

制造商预装了一些第三方应用程序,但它们可以快速而容易地被卸载。

诺基亚XR20软件
诺基亚XR20软件
诺基亚XR20软件

通信和GNSS - 快速Wi-Fi 5

诺基亚XR20正式作为 "Wi-Fi 6就绪 "设备出售,这意味着它可以与Wi-Fi 6网络通信,但不能达到其全部速度。在我们用Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器进行的测试中,由于其2x2 MIMO技术,这款智能手机实现了Wi-Fi 5智能手机的高传输速率,但正如预期的那样,它无法与真正的Wi-Fi 6设备相比。

5G已经上马,大量的4G频率也很吸引人。这使得这款智能手机适合去遥远的地方旅行,尽管它要成为真正的世界手机,还缺少一些更奇特的频率。在我们的信号质量测试中,诺基亚XR20被证明具有相当强的接收能力,在许多地方提供全面覆盖。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Mali-G57 MP4, Dimensity 800, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
697 (668min - 704max) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (561min - 645max) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=301, last 2 years)
439 MBit/s ∼63% -30%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (198min - 368max) MBit/s ∼48% -47%
CAT S62 Pro
Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
319 (159min - 324max) MBit/s ∼46% -49%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
222 (126min - 326max) MBit/s ∼32% -65%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
649 (589min - 673max) MBit/s ∼100%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Mali-G57 MP4, Dimensity 800, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (434min - 660max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=301, last 2 years)
436 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
349 (244min - 361max) MBit/s ∼54% -46%
CAT S62 Pro
Adreno 512, SD 660, 128 GB eMMC Flash
340 (313min - 349max) MBit/s ∼52% -48%
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
313 (190min - 343max) MBit/s ∼48% -52%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665609661656649650656660651656650659668659661642639651673639589609646658636652653654654648651609661656649650656660651656650659668659661642639651673639589609646658636652653654654648651561611608638637627632642614620645635644644643637623640629638635643632611630643639636638629Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø648 (589-673)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (561-645)

虽然我们的位置可以在户外快速确定,但准确度只在几个瞬间后提高,增加到最多三米。支持多种定位网络,智能手机也能快速找到许多卫星;但是,不支持能提供更高精度的附加SBAS系统。

为了能够做出更真实的陈述,我们带着诺基亚XR20骑了一小段自行车,并与Garmin Edge 520导航设备进行比较。智能手机在这里做得很好,相当准确地显示了路线,它甚至在老城区的狭窄小巷里显示出良好的准确性。虽然追踪结果并不完美,但对于日常使用来说已经绰绰有余。

Garmin Edge 520定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 概述
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 转折点
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 桥梁
Garmin Edge 520定位 - 桥梁
诺基亚XR20定位 - 概述
诺基亚XR20定位 - 概述
诺基亚XR20定位--转折点
诺基亚XR20定位--转折点
诺基亚XR20定位 - 桥梁
诺基亚XR20定位 - 桥梁

电话和通话质量 - 听起来可以接受

诺基亚使用谷歌的标准应用程序进行电话通话,并支持VoLTE以及VoWiFi的智能手机。

听筒可以提供强大的声音;毕竟,它是两个立体声扬声器之一。这意味着它很适合嘈杂的环境。问题是,附近的人几乎都能听到另一端的人在说什么,如果你不小心把音量提高太多,你的耳朵会很疼。

有明显的背景噪音,如嘶嘶声,但声音本身是相当清晰的。我们的声音也能很好地传递给来电者,即使我们说话的声音稍微轻一点。在免提模式下使用较低的扬声器;线路另一端的人的声音听起来稍显单薄,但我们的声音仍能很好地传输。

照相机--诺基亚XR20的蔡司双摄像头设置

前置摄像头样本
前置摄像头样本

相机系统比诺基亚X20 ,但它也具有与蔡司合作的优化光学系统和一个广角镜头。

4800万像素是主摄像头的最大分辨率,但你通常只用1200万像素拍照,因为这里通过像素组合实现了更高的出光率。这种较低的分辨率仍然足以应付绝大多数情况,而且用户还可以在特殊模式下使用全部像素。

当涉及到物体时,图像质量是相当可以接受的,但在较大的区域和拍摄周围环境时,在边缘有很多像素噪声。在非常低的光线和高对比度的情况下,细节仍然可以识别,但在大面积的图片中,它们会被洗掉。总的来说,这是一个普通的中档手机摄像头,但它没有什么可写的。

广角镜头拍摄的照片还不错,但不应该被放大太多,因为细节没有被准确显示。你只能在主摄像头和广角摄像头之间直接切换,不支持多级缩放。

视频最高可以录制为1080p和60帧,自动对焦功能往往需要一点时间来调整,特别是对近距离的物体,这种情况下,它明显会出现脉冲。曝光的调整方式有些呆滞。图像质量本身很好,偶尔拍摄视频时,声音质量也很好。

前面有一个800万像素的摄像头,它在一定程度上仍能再现头发等精细的细节,但在清晰度上有一些问题。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - FlowerMain camera - SurroundingsMain camera - Low lightWide-angle camera
click to load images

在实验室的控制照明条件下,可以发现图像的对比度向右上方下降了一些。文字在五颜六色的背景下显得格外清晰,但在边缘处有些模糊。一些较大的区域显示出像素噪音。

在照明度只有1勒克斯的情况下,人影仍然可以部分识别,但图像非常模糊。

ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
5 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia XR20: 4.89 ∆E min: 2.22 - max: 11.84 ∆E
ColorChecker
27 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
38.4 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
33.3 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
64 ∆E
65.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
48.2 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
68.5 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
48.4 ∆E
69.3 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
36.2 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia XR20: 43.44 ∆E min: 14.78 - max: 69.3 ∆E

配件和保修 - 没有充电器

盒子里没有充电器。制造商依靠的是大多数客户在家里都有一个USB电源适配器的事实,并打算保护环境。自然,诺基亚也通过这种方式省钱,但如果有人花20欧元(约24美元)买了一个额外的充电器,至少制造商会捐出收益。

芬兰人还提供了一个延长的FAQ: Guarantees, Return policies and Warranties,保修期为三年,这样用户就有希望把他们的智能手机保留更长时间。除此之外,制造商还提供了在第一年内更换一次显示屏的选择,以防显示屏损坏。显而易见,诺基亚正在使用大猩猩玻璃Victus以及额外的保护机制,如突出的边缘。

输入设备和处理 - 可配置的按钮

诺基亚XR20有两个额外的硬件按钮:上面的按钮可以用来触发对预定义联系人的紧急呼叫,或者你甚至可以将你想要的任何其他功能也分配给这个按钮。此外,在设备的左侧还有一个谷歌助理的按钮。

触摸屏可以通过软件变得更敏感一些,所以戴着手套或在潮湿的条件下也可以轻松使用。在我们的测试中,这实际上是相当可靠的工作。

指纹扫描仪位于外壳右侧的待机按钮中。虽然它需要一段时间来解锁手机,但整体表现非常令人满意。智能手机也可以通过面部识别快速解锁。

纵向模式下的键盘
纵向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘
横向模式下的键盘

显示屏 - 明亮和高对比度

子像素网格
子像素网格

凭借1080p IPS显示屏,诺基亚XR20与其他户外手机不相上下。近600cd/m²的平均亮度也很好,即使在较亮的日子里,也应该足以在户外度过。

同样好的是,显示屏的照明非常均匀,它提供了0.33cd/m²的体面的黑色水平,这导致了1,815:1的良好对比度。

601
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
594
cd/m²
598
cd/m²
602
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 602 cd/m² Average: 598.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 599 cd/m²
Contrast: 1815:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
128.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.279
Nokia XR20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.30
Blackview BL6000 Pro
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.36
CAT S62 Pro
LCD, 2160x1080, 5.70
Nokia X20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-30%
-26%
-41%
-31%
Brightness middle
599
569
-5%
583
-3%
506
-16%
646
8%
Brightness
598
562
-6%
518
-13%
489
-18%
617
3%
Brightness Distribution
99
91
-8%
83
-16%
86
-13%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.33
0.42
-27%
0.6
-82%
0.41
-24%
0.7
-112%
Contrast
1815
1355
-25%
972
-46%
1234
-32%
923
-49%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.52
6.14
-36%
4.78
-6%
6.9
-53%
5.71
-26%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.6
10.92
-44%
8.7
-14%
12.6
-66%
8.9
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.2
7.9
-88%
5.5
-31%
8.5
-102%
6.2
-48%
Gamma
2.279 97%
2.256 98%
2.22 99%
2.4 92%
2.122 104%
CCT
7309 89%
8696 75%
6830 95%
8818 74%
8256 79%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1163000 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1163000 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1163000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

虽然我们在低亮度时检测到PWM,但它的频率很高,实际上可以忽略不计,对任何人来说都不应该是个问题。

色彩再现并不完美,但它是相当体面的。一个蓝色的色调只是非常轻微的可见。

CalMan - 颜色精度
CalMan - 颜色精度
CalMan - Grayscales
CalMan - Grayscales
CalMan - sRGB色彩空间
CalMan - sRGB色彩空间
CalMan - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMan - AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMan - DCI-P3色彩空间
CalMan - DCI-P3色彩空间
CalMan - 饱和度
CalMan - 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

这款智能手机在户外阳光下的表现也很好,但在较暗的地方使用它显然更舒服,因为显示屏上有反光。

从侧面看显示屏时,出现的亮度波动不是很大,所以我们对可视角度也很满意。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能--诺基亚手机具有中档实力

在购买诺基亚XR20时,你应该记住一件事:你可以用499欧元(约589美元)买到更强大的智能手机,如OnePlus Nord 2 5GMotorola Moto G100。因此,你必须牺牲一些性能来换取智能手机的保护。

然而,凭借骁龙480 5G ,诺基亚XR20提供的SoC与其他户外手机相比相当强大,而且它也很适合日常使用。当然,在运行多个应用程序或要求很高的应用程序时,可能会出现卡顿,但在滚动菜单和正常的日常使用中,很少能注意到较慢的性能。

Adreno 619图形单元对于一款中档智能手机来说也绝对够用。

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
504 Points ∼87%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
294 Points ∼51% -42%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
510 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (504 - 520, n=6)
511 Points ∼88% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=248, last 2 years)
581 Points ∼100% +15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1662 Points ∼83%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1424 Points ∼72% -14%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1663 Points ∼84% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1627 - 1713, n=6)
1671 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=248, last 2 years)
1991 Points ∼100% +20%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
976 Points ∼44%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
995 Points ∼45% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (926 - 1029, n=6)
982 Points ∼45% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=143, last 2 years)
2197 Points ∼100% +125%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1092 Points ∼48%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
571 Points ∼25% -48%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1082 Points ∼48% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1048 - 1099, n=6)
1081 Points ∼48% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=146, last 2 years)
2269 Points ∼100% +108%
PCMark for Android
Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7090 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6928 - 8402, n=5)
7557 Points ∼75% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=63, last 2 years)
10043 Points ∼100% +42%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5351 Points ∼64%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8315 Points ∼100%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
6093 Points ∼73%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6380 Points ∼77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6380 - 7713, n=2)
7047 Points ∼85%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=259, last 2 years)
7951 Points ∼96%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3527 Points ∼77%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4591 Points ∼100% +30%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1872 Points ∼41% -47%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3461 Points ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3461 - 3596, n=6)
3516 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=257, last 2 years)
3474 Points ∼76% -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3692 Points ∼77%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4806 Points ∼100% +30%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1802 Points ∼37% -51%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3647 Points ∼76% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3647 - 3767, n=6)
3684 Points ∼77% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=257, last 2 years)
4073 Points ∼85% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3051 Points ∼77%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3969 Points ∼100% +30%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2451 Points ∼62% -20%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2938 Points ∼74% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2938 - 3103, n=6)
3034 Points ∼76% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=257, last 2 years)
2801 Points ∼71% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3656 Points ∼78%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4659 Points ∼100% +27%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1972 Points ∼42% -46%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3639 Points ∼78% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3602 - 3656, n=6)
3636 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=278, last 2 years)
4170 Points ∼90% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3845 Points ∼73%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4721 Points ∼89% +23%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1873 Points ∼35% -51%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3842 Points ∼73% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3817 - 3845, n=6)
3835 Points ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=278, last 2 years)
5279 Points ∼100% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3118 Points ∼70%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4455 Points ∼100% +43%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2593 Points ∼58% -17%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3070 Points ∼69% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3008 - 3118, n=6)
3076 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=276, last 2 years)
2999 Points ∼67% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2438 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1555 Points ∼46% -36%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3380 Points ∼100% +39%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1124 Points ∼33% -54%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2419 Points ∼72% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2419 - 2478, n=6)
2436 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=253, last 2 years)
2669 Points ∼79% +9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2302 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1450 Points ∼45% -37%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3241 Points ∼100% +41%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1097 Points ∼34% -52%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2289 Points ∼71% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2287 - 2338, n=6)
2302 Points ∼71% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=253, last 2 years)
2823 Points ∼87% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3076 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2080 Points ∼52% -32%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3979 Points ∼100% +29%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2502 Points ∼63% -19%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3017 Points ∼76% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3017 - 3136, n=6)
3059 Points ∼77% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=253, last 2 years)
2835 Points ∼71% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2566 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1620 Points ∼46% -37%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3557 Points ∼100% +39%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1287 Points ∼36% -50%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2536 Points ∼71% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2536 - 2566, n=6)
2559 Points ∼72% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=277, last 2 years)
3386 Points ∼95% +32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2448 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1527 Points ∼40% -38%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3368 Points ∼88% +38%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1192 Points ∼31% -51%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2440 Points ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2440 - 2448, n=6)
2445 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=277, last 2 years)
3823 Points ∼100% +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3090 Points ∼70%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2058 Points ∼46% -33%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
4427 Points ∼100% +43%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2683 Points ∼61% -13%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2941 Points ∼66% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2941 - 3098, n=6)
3060 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=277, last 2 years)
3045 Points ∼69% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2322 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1540 Points ∼50% -34%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3095 Points ∼100% +33%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1182 Points ∼38% -49%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2267 Points ∼73% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2267 - 2322, n=6)
2281 Points ∼74% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=214, last 2 years)
2638 Points ∼85% +14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2250 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1436 Points ∼45% -36%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
3187 Points ∼100% +42%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
998 Points ∼31% -56%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2186 Points ∼69% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2184 - 2250, n=6)
2199 Points ∼69% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=214, last 2 years)
2958 Points ∼93% +31%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2613 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2061 Points ∼73% -21%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
2812 Points ∼100% +8%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2382 Points ∼85% -9%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
2606 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (2606 - 2664, n=6)
2624 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=214, last 2 years)
2649 Points ∼94% +1%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
980 Points ∼34%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1679 Points ∼59% +71%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
980 Points ∼34% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (980 - 986, n=6)
981 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=107, last 2 years)
2853 Points ∼100% +191%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
977 Points ∼33%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
1641 Points ∼56% +68%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
974 Points ∼33% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (969 - 978, n=6)
974 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 8672, n=103, last 2 years)
2955 Points ∼100% +202%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
294 Points ∼33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (290 - 294, n=5)
292 Points ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (83 - 2288, n=55, last 2 years)
896 Points ∼100% +205%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
287 Points ∼32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (284 - 287, n=5)
285 Points ∼32% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117 - 1982, n=53, last 2 years)
896 Points ∼100% +212%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
59 fps ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
37 fps ∼58% -37%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
42 fps ∼66% -29%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
59 fps ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (58 - 84, n=5)
63.8 fps ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=218, last 2 years)
59.6 fps ∼93% +1%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
81 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
40 fps ∼37% -51%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
45 fps ∼42% -44%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
81 fps ∼75% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (81 - 81, n=5)
81 fps ∼75% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 319, n=218, last 2 years)
108 fps ∼100% +33%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
37 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
22 fps ∼47% -41%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
19 fps ∼40% -49%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼55% -30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (26 - 66, n=5)
40.2 fps ∼85% +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=216, last 2 years)
47.1 fps ∼100% +27%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
41 fps ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
20 fps ∼31% -51%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
20 fps ∼31% -51%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
41 fps ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (41 - 41, n=5)
41 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=217, last 2 years)
63.5 fps ∼100% +55%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
14 fps ∼38% -46%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
13 fps ∼35% -50%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
26 fps ∼71% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (26 - 53, n=5)
31.4 fps ∼86% +21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=215, last 2 years)
36.7 fps ∼100% +41%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
16 fps ∼37% -45%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
14 fps ∼32% -52%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
29 fps ∼67% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (29 - 29, n=5)
29 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=215, last 2 years)
43.6 fps ∼100% +50%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
14 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.2 fps ∼40% -34%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.6 fps ∼33% -46%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
14 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (14 - 28, n=5)
16.8 fps ∼74% +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 61, n=214, last 2 years)
22.8 fps ∼100% +63%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -37%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
8 fps ∼31% -50%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼61% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 16, n=5)
16 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=214, last 2 years)
26.2 fps ∼100% +64%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
9.4 fps ∼41% -41%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
21 fps ∼91% +31%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.5 fps ∼32% -53%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
16 fps ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (16 - 30, n=6)
18.3 fps ∼79% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=283, last 2 years)
23.1 fps ∼100% +44%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
18 fps ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
10 fps ∼38% -44%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
22 fps ∼83% +22%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
7.9 fps ∼30% -56%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
18 fps ∼68% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (17 - 19, n=6)
18 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=282, last 2 years)
26.6 fps ∼100% +48%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
5.6 fps ∼37% -44%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
13 fps ∼86% +30%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4.7 fps ∼31% -53%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
9.9 fps ∼65% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (9.9 - 19, n=6)
11.5 fps ∼76% +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=283, last 2 years)
15.2 fps ∼100% +52%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6.5 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
3.5 fps ∼34% -46%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 800, Mali-G57 MP4, 8192
8.2 fps ∼79% +26%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
3 fps ∼29% -54%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6.5 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6.4 - 6.7, n=6)
6.55 fps ∼63% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=283, last 2 years)
10.4 fps ∼100% +60%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
322933 Points ∼66%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
325785 Points ∼67% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (227632 - 325785, n=5)
297483 Points ∼61% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121238 - 815441, n=50, last 2 years)
486464 Points ∼100% +51%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
264533 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
175661 Points ∼52% -34%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
161462 Points ∼48% -39%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
262987 Points ∼78% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (257336 - 264533, n=5)
261519 Points ∼78% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=195, last 2 years)
337174 Points ∼100% +27%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4716 Points ∼7%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
4722 Points ∼7% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (4707 - 4894, n=5)
4765 Points ∼7% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=76, last 2 years)
68422 Points ∼100% +1351%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3265 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2057 Points ∼55% -37%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2225 Points ∼60% -32%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3260 Points ∼87% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3197 - 3265, n=4)
3238 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 7123, n=204, last 2 years)
3730 Points ∼100% +14%
System (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6296 Points ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
4029 Points ∼59% -36%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
4627 Points ∼68% -27%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
6308 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (6296 - 6330, n=4)
6308 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 11774, n=204, last 2 years)
6806 Points ∼100% +8%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3847 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1717 Points ∼39% -55%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2236 Points ∼51% -42%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3484 Points ∼79% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3331 - 3847, n=4)
3559 Points ∼81% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=204, last 2 years)
4385 Points ∼100% +14%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3765 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
2150 Points ∼37% -43%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
2083 Points ∼36% -45%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
3780 Points ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (3765 - 3843, n=4)
3801 Points ∼65% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 15739, n=204, last 2 years)
5828 Points ∼100% +55%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1247 Points ∼92%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096
1202 Points ∼88% -4%
CAT S62 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 6144
1334 Points ∼98% +7%
Nokia X20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 8192
1360 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
  (1247 - 1360, n=4)
1290 Points ∼95% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=204, last 2 years)
1282 Points ∼94% +3%

在我们的浏览器基准测试中,这款智能手机有时会达到最高点,因此,考虑到它是一款坚固的智能手机,在浏览互联网时速度相当快。

在实践中,这意味着你必须等待一下页面加载,但图像通常在滚动时已经显示出来。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=186, last 2 years)
50.2 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
49.39 Points ∼98% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (44 - 49.4, n=5)
46.8 Points ∼93% +1%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
46.435 Points ∼93%
CAT S62 Pro (Chrome 85)
30.821 Points ∼61% -34%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
27.671 Points ∼55% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=198, last 2 years)
90.3 Points ∼100% +8%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
84.271 Points ∼93% +1%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
83.5 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (78.6 - 84.3, n=5)
81.2 Points ∼90% -3%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
50.992 Points ∼56% -39%
CAT S62 Pro (Chrome 85)
47.986 Points ∼53% -43%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=171, last 2 years)
49 runs/min ∼100% +30%
Nokia X20 (Chome 90)
38.7 runs/min ∼79% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (37.6 - 39.2, n=5)
38.4 runs/min ∼78% +2%
Nokia XR20 (Chome 92)
37.62 runs/min ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chome 80)
29 runs/min ∼59% -23%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=205, last 2 years)
78.2 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (67 - 80, n=5)
71.6 Points ∼92% +4%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
70 Points ∼90% +1%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼88%
CAT S62 Pro (Chrome 85)
47 Points ∼60% -32%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
46 Points ∼59% -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=213, last 2 years)
17842 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
17816 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (15636 - 17816, n=5)
16270 Points ∼91% -9%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
15958 Points ∼89% -10%
CAT S62 Pro (Chrome 85)
9431 Points ∼53% -47%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
7442 Points ∼42% -58%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)
6212.4 ms * ∼100% -161%
CAT S62 Pro (Chrome 85)
4662.3 ms * ∼75% -96%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=215, last 2 years)
3894 ms * ∼63% -63%
Nokia X20 (Chrome 90)
2748.8 ms * ∼44% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (2383 - 2749, n=5)
2639 ms * ∼42% -11%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
2382.7 ms * ∼38%

* ... smaller is better

在XR20中安装了UFS 2.1存储,这款坚固的智能手机也能够舒适地将自己与同级别的其他手机区分开来,实现良好的传输速率。

Nokia XR20Samsung Galaxy XCover ProBlackview BL6000 ProCAT S62 ProNokia X20Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-31%
14%
-61%
-1%
-4%
1%
Sequential Read 256KB
485
507.6
5%
872.5
80%
304.2
-37%
489.3
1%
770 (427 - 999, n=88)
59%
787 (41.9 - 2037, n=291, last 2 years)
62%
Sequential Write 256KB
452
181.1
-60%
198.5
-56%
185.32
-59%
462.7
2%
264 (13.6 - 707, n=88)
-42%
350 (11.9 - 1321, n=291, last 2 years)
-23%
Random Read 4KB
174.8
108.6
-38%
190.2
9%
79.4
-55%
165.4
-5%
147 (92.6 - 239, n=88)
-16%
140 (13.5 - 325, n=291, last 2 years)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
146.2
100.5
-31%
181.9
24%
12.43
-91%
144.6
-1%
122 (18.2 - 290, n=88)
-17%
126 (5.2 - 330, n=291, last 2 years)
-14%

游戏--达到60 fps是可能的

诺基亚XR20并不是一款专门的游戏手机,但它在我们的测试过程中,对于一款中档手机来说,它的速率很好。使用GameBench ,我们确定,在快速射击游戏《Armajet》中,60帧的帧率保持得相当稳定。

在要求更高的《PUBG Mobile》中,智能手机在低细节下至少达到40帧以下,在更高的质量下达到相当稳定的30帧。

通过触摸屏和位置传感器控制设备也很顺利。因此,如果你把你的期望值降低一点,你可以体面地玩游戏。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
氩氦刀
氩氦刀
0510152025303540455055606060586060606060605960606060605960606060606059606060606060596060606060596060606060605960606060606059606060606059606060606060595860606060606058606060606060596060606060596060606060605960606060606059606060606059606060606060596060606060605960606060605960606060606059586060606040394040393840393940393941403940404040404041394040404037404040404040394139404040414039413941403941403840404040404040404039403840394040606058606060606060596060606060596060606060605960606060606059606060606059606060606060596060606060605960606060605960606060606059586060606040394040393840393940393941403940404040404041394040404037404040404040394139404040414039413941403941403840404040404040404039403840394040293129303129303130302930303030312930303029303029303030292930303030303030303029303030303029303030303030303030293029313030303030293030303030Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.60.13: Ø59.8 (58-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 1.5.0: Ø39.7 (37-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 1.5.0: Ø29.9 (29-31)

排放 - 无节流

温度

这款机箱的最高温度上升到41.3 °C(约106 °F),仍然在限制范围内,而且正如3DMark的压力测试所显示的那样,它根本不影响性能。超过99%的初始性能在长时间的负载后仍然可用。

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia X20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (973min - 977max) % ∼100% 0%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 (5.86min - 5.89max) % ∼100%
Blackview BL6000 Pro
Mali-G57 MP4, Dimensity 800, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.5 % ∼99% -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 (1.747min - 1.763max) % ∼100%
Max. Load
 39 °C38 °C37 °C 
 39 °C38 °C37.4 °C 
 38.4 °C37.8 °C37.3 °C 
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 38 °C
35.7 °C38.6 °C41.3 °C
36.8 °C38.8 °C40.5 °C
36.5 °C38 °C39.7 °C
Maximum: 41.3 °C
Average: 38.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
热图-背面
热图-背面
热图--正面
热图--正面

发言人

诺基亚XR20甚至配备了立体声扬声器。诚然,你不能指望看到像以前HTC那样的专用立体声扬声器;相反,听筒也被用作第二个扬声器,但它仍然是有意义的。

扬声器在需要时可以变得相当响亮,但它们听起来非常高亢,几乎完全缺乏低音或低中音。此外,当音量过高时,高音符经常在耳朵里发出令人不快的声音。总而言之,声音质量只是一般。

最好使用耳机或外部扬声器,可以通过蓝牙或3.5毫米音频插孔连接。两者都很好用,甚至还有aptX HD的无线声音传输功能。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.643.12540.236.73133.430.64031.232.9503537.46327.526.98020.120.910019.624.312517.219.716015.923.120012.435.62501249.731510.256.240010.159.75008.763.463015.270.580016.372.2100015.674.8125013.174.5160011.173.3200011.572250011.771.7315014.173.1400014.473.9500017.769.1630016.566.3800016.767.71000018.171.11250017.557.81600018.848.4SPL27.183.9N0.858.2median 15.2median 67.7Delta2.612.733.635.23535.724.821.224.922.528.525.7272815.717.416.521.615.722.614.437.79.141.39.6467.549.410.655.612.358.218.760.817.66515.772.711.574.210.875.89.974.41372.116.468.115.461.71761.318.266.120.27420.475.217.361.817.84528.383.40.952.2median 15.7median 61.72.813.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia XR20Nokia X20
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia XR20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Nokia X20 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

电池寿命 - 长时间户外续航

能源消耗

在我们的测试中,诺基亚XR20被证明是相对节俭的。这款智能手机在高负荷下平均消耗4.9瓦特。

由于该设备没有附带充电器,您应该确保至少选择一个10瓦的充电器,以保证设备在最大负荷下仍能充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.6 Watt
Load midlight 2.7 / 4.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
4050 mAh
CAT S62 Pro
4000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-56%
-101%
-19%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
0.9
-29%
1.68
-140%
0.734 (0.63 - 0.9, n=5)
-5%
0.954 (0.37 - 2.5, n=233, last 2 years)
-36%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.8
-64%
2.75
-150%
1.552 (1.1 - 1.74, n=5)
-41%
1.813 (0.65 - 3.94, n=233, last 2 years)
-65%
Idle Maximum *
1.6
2.3
-44%
2.8
-75%
1.778 (1.6 - 1.9, n=5)
-11%
2.06 (0.69 - 4.2, n=233, last 2 years)
-29%
Load Average *
2.7
5.4
-100%
4.84
-79%
3.56 (2.7 - 4.5, n=5)
-32%
4.44 (2.1 - 8.4, n=233, last 2 years)
-64%
Load Maximum *
4.9
6.9
-41%
7.79
-59%
5.09 (4.75 - 5.9, n=5)
-4%
7.29 (3.68 - 12.3, n=233, last 2 years)
-49%

* ... smaller is better

Energy consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123451.9762.292.172.132.132.082.022.512.192.121.3151.9752.541.830.8520.9332.062.431.9561.9732.012.42.532.392.290.9181.8381.551.970.8572.051.9761.6291.7011.1621.7132.142.680.8911.8682.41.2962.862.222.342.182.182.322.442.242.192.262.382.482.030.9071.8631.0132.833.733.664.184.633.633.543.261.4962.232.032.081.1851.9082.361.950.8680.8962.231.2652.292.152.062.192.591.2092.180.9091.4772.932.072.521.9532.632.62.041.8741.9640.8681.3112.182.342.392.472.8920.8490.9043.930.8663.733.793.813.753.793.733.883.773.763.714.213.663.353.723.824.063.553.763.743.783.930.8883.833.833.773.853.770.9732.121.9424.164.153.813.954.163.884.413.864.283.550.8933.233.51.0182.562.642.682.922.910.8654.284.24.064.174.132.233.720.8814.043.154.183.943.593.83.941.9473.95.074.324.211.0863.843.813.831.7533.133.643.763.771.2214.644.883.312.621.0874.23.863.750.9760.9694.154.273.443.763.763.654.262.664.134.184.274.114.10.8864.134.692.764.414.764.534.7244.513.594.53.840.9264.284.110.9243.964.6145.183.144.285.183.785.054.54.043.7954.254.893.674.085.073.845.163.734.215.324.045.193.570.9191.9931.9742.52.491.9783.814.014.463.9344.154.153.993.923.944.143.913.954.044.222.260.8564.775.211.951Tooltip
: Ø3 (0.849-5.32)

Energy consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.91.11.31.51.71.92.22.42.62.833.23.53.73.94.14.333.73.23.23.463.233.283.33.283.73.23.413.183.533.533.433.053.263.363.823.583.493.163.813.283.313.33.433.233.43.323.363.333.273.473.413.313.343.773.963.393.333.283.343.633.383.213.343.443.643.93.233.463.293.383.423.43.463.353.793.54.333.73.23.23.463.233.283.33.283.73.23.413.183.533.533.433.053.263.363.823.583.493.163.813.283.313.33.433.233.43.323.363.333.273.473.413.313.343.773.963.393.333.283.343.633.383.213.343.443.643.93.233.463.293.383.423.43.463.353.793.51.0561.6781.0211.0591.3761.0741.0631.2670.9961.3931.0550.9480.9731.0761.9061.0080.9911.0481.1081.6430.9151.0561.020.9661.3480.9481.1251.6050.9630.9391.1021.0471.0890.9751.1880.9890.9381.161.0121.2360.9480.9611.0460.9551.2110.9730.9381.0780.9530.9341.1381.190.9521.11.0351.2061.0561.011.021.0021.178Tooltip
; Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.43 (3.05-4.33)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.102 (0.915-1.906)

电池寿命

得益于4630毫安时的电池,诺基亚XR20还提供了相当长的电池寿命:在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,15:27小时当然不是记录,但还是相当不错的。而其他许多户外手机在其他电池测试中也都落后了。在日常使用中,你应该很容易地处理几天不充电的问题,如果你非常密集地使用它,至少应该足够一个工作日使用。

使用电缆时,智能手机的最大充电功率为18瓦,充满电只需要不到2小时。甚至支持使用Qi标准的无线充电,在这种情况下,15瓦的充电功率是最大的。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 46min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 55min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 01min
Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
4050 mAh
Blackview BL6000 Pro
5280 mAh
CAT S62 Pro
4000 mAh
Nokia X20
4470 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
-9%
-28%
-5%
Reader / Idle
1786
1259
-30%
H.264
895
802
-10%
WiFi v1.3
927
731
-21%
846
-9%
668
-28%
879
-5%
Load
301
268
-11%

Pros

+ 坚固且不太笨重
+ 广泛的保修
+ 全面的连接,包括5G
+ 长期更新的承诺
+ 相当纯粹Android
+ 可指定的按钮
+ 明亮的显示屏
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 快速的WLAN
+ 良好的4G信号强度

Cons

- 一些广告应用程序
- 只有一个双摄像头设置
- 声音质量平平

结论--诺基亚的良好耐用手机

审查中。诺基亚XR20。测试设备由诺基亚德国公司提供。
审查中。诺基亚XR20。测试设备由诺基亚德国公司提供。

通过XR20,诺基亚将一个令人兴奋的包装放在一起。一款受到良好保护的智能手机,拥有长期的保修期,时尚的外壳,四年的更新承诺,良好的电池寿命,体面的性能,以及明亮的显示屏。此外,你还得到了快速的Wi-Fi,设备没有过度发热,以及一个用户可指定的按钮。

当然,你可以用不到500欧元(约590美元)的价格买到更快、甚至更高质量的手机,但它们没有XR20那么强悍。

总而言之,诺基亚提供了一款非常有说服力的耐用型智能手机,它还以小而精的细节而令人信服,如腕带的开孔。

尽管三星也提供了一款强大的户外手机,并以Galaxy XCover Pro 的形式提供了可定制的按钮,但它在某些方面不得不承认失败,如电池寿命和性能。CAT S62 Pro也是一款可靠的户外手机,但它的热成像相机更像是一款小众产品。

诺基亚XR20是一款时尚的户外手机,在许多方面都令人信服,同时还提供广泛的保修和更新承诺。

对于那些正在为员工寻找一款功能合理、不会立即坏掉的手机的企业客户,或者那些希望在坚固的智能手机中拥有一个体面的摄像头的户外运动者来说,这是一笔好买卖。

价格和可用性

在写这篇文章的时候,诺基亚XR20正在,可直接从制造商处预购价格为549.99美元(128GB/6GB机型)。你也可以在亚马逊上预购。.

Nokia XR20 - 08/27/2021 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
69 / 75 → 92%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
87%
Battery
90%
Display
87%
Games Performance
27 / 64 → 43%
Application Performance
68 / 86 → 79%
Temperature
91%