卡特彼勒CAT S75评测--带卫星通讯和水下摄像头的户外智能手机
据制造商称,Cat S75的建议售价为599欧元,是有史以来最可靠的Cat智能手机。这款户外手机的外壳通过了IP68以及IP69K标准的认证,还能抵御极端温度、湿度和振动。
Cat S75有一个6.6英寸、120赫兹的IPS显示屏和一个带水下模式的三摄像头设置。这款坚固耐用的手机由一个 联发科Dimensity 930,它有6GB的内存和128GB的闪存。最新的Cat后代的特殊功能是Bullitt卫星连接功能,它可以与静止卫星进行通信。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.7 % | 05/2023 | CAT S75 Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256 | 268 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
78.3 % | 04/2023 | CAT S53 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 320 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
82.6 % | 12/2022 | Gigaset GX6 Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 278 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
81.9 % | 08/2022 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 235 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
保护壳 - 带凹槽的户外智能手机
Cat S75的重点是高稳定性和抗摔性,但显示屏与表面的比率仅有76.7%,很受影响。这款来自卡特彼勒的耐用智能手机通过了IP-68/69K和MIL-STD-810H的认证--你可以在这里阅读有关军事标准及其缺点https://www.notebookcheck.com/Bekommt-die-Smartphone-Landschaft-mit-dem-MIL-STD-810-einen-neuen-Schutzstandard.396881.0.html.
Cat S75的做工处于良好水平,但这款户外手机并没有真正意义上的高质量。然而,根据制造商的说法,塑料外壳可以用刷子和消毒湿巾清洗,还含有抗菌银离子。IP69K认证甚至可以保护Cat S75在短距离高压清洗时不受热水影响。
设备 - CAT S75带卫星电话
这款户外手机的功能包括Miracast、一个状态LED、蓝牙5.1和NFC。外围设备也可以通过USB-C端口使用OTG适配器连接。USB接口使用慢速2.0标准进行数据传输。
Cat S75只有6GB内存和128GB内部UFS存储的版本。需要更多存储空间的人可以通过microSD卡进行扩展。
微型SD卡读卡器
集成的microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准,但内存只能增加128GB。结合我们的参考卡Angelbird AV PRO V60,这款户外手机在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现相当令人信服。然而,Cat S75的复制速度很慢,不到20MB/s。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
CAT S53 (Angelbird V60) | |
Gigaset GX6 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
CAT S75 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
软件--户外智能手机与Android 12
这款猫咪智能手机装运的是谷歌的操作系统Android 12。制造商宣传说对其坚固耐用的手机有五年的更新支持,但只计划进行两次主要的Android 更新。相应地,供应将在下一个Android 代14结束。
安全更新可使用三年,但只有关键的安全漏洞会在另外两年内得到修复。在测试时,Cat S75的安全补丁从2023年2月起已经过时。
通信和GNSS - CAT S75与5G
卡特彼勒公司的耐用手机除了支持高级手机必须的4G和5G之外,还可以通过Bullitt Satellite Messenger实现卫星通信(NTN)。这项卫星服务,但没有短信,可以在购买Cat智能手机后的12个月内免费使用。在这之后,必须进行订阅,每月费用高达60欧元。
与其依赖一个专有的卫星网络,不如使用 Apple iPhone 14 Pro由于采用了联发科芯片,Cat S75通过传统的3GPP NTN信号进行通信,因此可以根据哪颗卫星实现最佳连接质量,使用不同供应商的卫星。因此,即使在没有移动网络的情况下,用户应该总是能够发送和接收短信,并拨打紧急电话。
这款户外手机只提供家庭Wi-Fi网络内的Wi-Fi 5,结合我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,只够平均传输速率低于400Mbps。
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=205, last 2 years) | |
CAT S53 | |
CAT S75 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=206, last 2 years) | |
CAT S53 | |
CAT S75 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 |
Cat S75使用卫星网络GPS、BeiDou、Galileo和Glonass双频以及SBAS进行定位。这款手机在户外提供了良好的准确性。我们还检查了在自行车旅行中的定位精度,并将结果与Garmin的Venu 2智能手表进行比较。 Cat S75的路线与参考设备的路线非常接近。
电话和语音质量--双SIM卡的耐用电话
Cat S75通过移动网络的通话质量,包括VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话,都很好,内置的麦克风可以大声清晰地传输声音。在测试中,通过安装的前置摄像头进行视频通话也没有问题。这款户外手机支持双卡,但在使用卫星服务时需要占用一个卡槽。
相机 - CAT S75,50MP
后置的主摄像头有一个f/1.8的开放光圈。5千万像素的图像传感器提供了坚实的照片质量,至少在明亮的光线条件下。然而,考虑到这个价格范围,锐度和图像细节都不是真正令人信服的。后置摄像头单元在低光照条件下也只有一个适度的好成绩。随着光线的减少,模糊度明显增加--这也适用于低分辨率的超广角镜头在白天的情况。
然而,据制造商称,Cat S75的亮点在于其双摄像头单元是防水的,甚至可以承受五米深的水压而不受损害。这款户外手机还搭载了相应的水下模式。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle配件和保修 - 户外手机不含电源适配器
我们的Cat S75在交货范围内既没有充电器也没有汽车适配器。此外,显示器上也没有保护膜。盒子里只有一条USB线和信息资料。
制造商为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。对其智能手机提供24个月的保修,在有CAT服务的地方,该保修在全球范围内有效。在紧急情况下,客户和帮助服务(危机应对中心)也可以通过Bullitt卫星信使以200多种语言一年365天提供。
输入和操作 - 带有指纹传感器的坚固手机
Cat S75提供两个可编程的按键,可用于按压式通话和紧急呼叫。这款户外手机有一个电容式触摸屏,具有令人信服的滑行特性。在精确度方面也没有什么可抱怨的,所以我们用手指的输入都能准确实现。
集成在背面的指纹传感器可以可靠地解锁这款坚固耐用的手机。从待机模式到显示屏打开的时间也足够短。还提供了通过前置摄像头(2D)的FaceUnlock功能,在良好的照明条件下可以很快识别用户。
显示屏 - 带有IPS的户外手机
Cat S75配备了一个6.58英寸的IPS显示屏,其分辨率达到了不寻常的2408 x 1080像素。实现的像素密度略高于400 ppi大关。这款Cat智能手机没有使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制。
这款坚固耐用的智能手机在亮度方面只能在有限的范围内说服人。我们在纯白的背景上测得的最大亮度为580cd/m²--从竞争者的角度来看,这是一个不错的比率,但对于一款为户外使用而设计的手机来说,仍然很低。即使是采用AMOLED屏幕的廉价中档手机,如 Redmi Note 12屏,也能照得更亮。在更现实的APL18测量中,在黑暗区域,它几乎是相同的602 cd/m²。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 566 cd/m²
Contrast: 1204:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
CAT S75 IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.58 | CAT S53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.50 | Gigaset GX6 IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -0% | 18% | -30% | 43% | |
Brightness middle | 566 | 476 -16% | 505 -11% | 510 -10% | 650 15% |
Brightness | 529 | 504 -5% | 491 -7% | 495 -6% | 658 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 82 -1% | 93 12% | 92 11% | 97 17% |
Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.6 -28% | 0.3 36% | 0.46 2% | |
Contrast | 1204 | 793 -34% | 1683 40% | 1109 -8% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.02 | 3.18 37% | 4.32 14% | 7.41 -48% | 1.55 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.6 | 5.86 39% | 7.22 25% | 13.26 -38% | 2.59 73% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 4.2 5% | 3 32% | 10.6 -141% | 1.8 59% |
Gamma | 2.248 98% | 2.268 97% | 2.268 97% | 2.518 87% | 2.194 100% |
CCT | 7173 91% | 7234 90% | 7098 92% | 10050 65% | 6316 103% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在我们的显示测量中,Cat S75的IPS面板实现了0.47cd/m²的稳固黑值。超过1000:1的对比度仍然令人满意。
显示分析是在光谱仪和Calman软件的帮助下进行的。色彩(5.0)和灰度(4.4)再现的偏差应被评为高,与参考色的差异是清晰可见的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
↘ 5.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.9 ms rise | |
↘ 18.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms). |
这款户外手机在户外留下了坚实的印象,但显示内容在阳光直射下几乎看不到。在平视角度下,IPS面板的颜色很稳定,但显示屏看起来有点褪色。
性能 - CAT S75采用联发科SoC系统
在Cat S75内部工作的是一个 联发科Dimensity 930,包括一个Imagination IMG BXM-8-256作为图形单元。该系统的速度在日常使用中是足够的,但小的滞后仍然存在。
亮度930的性能 Dimensity 930的性能低于 骁龙778G中的 三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro,特别是在Geekbench的多分数中,联发科SoC在这个价格范围内得分很弱。这同样适用于2014年发布的图形单元。IMG BXM-8-256甚至无法跟上高通公司的中端GPU--Adreno 642L。 Adreno 642L在GFXBench中提供几乎两倍于Cat S75的速率。
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (641 - 698, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1787 - 1909, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 |
Geekbench 6.0 | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (832 - 916, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Smartphone (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1998 - 2306, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 |
Antutu v9 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (394141 - 430895, n=2) | |
CAT S75 |
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
Average of class Smartphone (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years) |
CrossMark - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (200 - 1474, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (606 - 612, n=2) | |
CAT S75 |
BaseMark OS II | |
Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (3527 - 3771, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
System | |
Average of class Smartphone (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (6635 - 6979, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
Memory | |
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (4352 - 4955, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Graphics | |
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S75 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (4011 - 4298, n=2) | |
Web | |
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1276 - 1457, n=2) | |
CAT S75 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro |
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (5039 - 5507, n=2) | |
CAT S75 |
AImark - Score v3.x | |
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 245629, n=99, last 2 years) | |
CAT S75 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (877 - 953, n=2) |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 | |
Gigaset GX6 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S53 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S53 | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
CAT S53 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S53 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
CAT S53 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S53 | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
CAT S53 | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S75 | |
CAT S53 |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
Gigaset GX6 | |
CAT S53 | |
CAT S75 |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (64.7 - 77.1, n=2) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (44.1 - 58.4, n=2) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=153, last 2 years) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (69 - 86, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (93 - 110, n=2) | |
CAT S75 (Chromee 114) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (20342 - 26766, n=2) | |
Gigaset GX6 (Chrome 107) | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
CAT S53 (Chrome 112) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
CAT S75 (Chrome 114) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1466 - 1986, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104) | |
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
CAT S75 | CAT S53 | Gigaset GX6 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -50% | -37% | -24% | -27% | 24% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 991.21 | 510.9 -48% | 953.5 -4% | 841.6 -15% | 704 ? -29% | 1471 ? 48% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 878.23 | 208.2 -76% | 454.7 -48% | 484.7 -45% | 517 ? -41% | 1084 ? 23% |
Random Read 4KB | 221.56 | 140.7 -36% | 194.9 -12% | 170.6 -23% | 187.2 ? -16% | 243 ? 10% |
Random Write 4KB | 233.91 | 141.4 -40% | 39.9 -83% | 204.2 -13% | 181.7 ? -22% | 267 ? 14% |
游戏--Cat S75管理120 fps
我们使用GameBench应用程序检查Cat S75的图形性能和来自Play Store的三个Android 游戏。我们的第一个测试游戏,PUBG Mobile,只能在中等细节(HD)下玩--UHD设置是不可选择的。这款射击游戏的渲染速度为30帧/秒,在最低的细节设置下可以达到40帧/秒。
要求不高的游戏,如《死亡扳机2》,以120帧的速度接近原生帧率运行。然而,竞技场射击游戏Armajet显示出较大的波动,帧率严重下降到30帧以下。
排放 - 户外电话保持凉爽
温度
在我们的稳定性测试场景中,Cat S75的机箱几乎没有升温--我们只在背部测量到37.2℃的峰值。3DMark的压力测试并不支持 联发科SoC因此,我们无法为这台户外手机提供测试。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
卡特彼勒公司的这款坚固的手机依靠两个扬声器,其音量超过85分贝。我们的测量结果显示,Cat S75的中音和高音的频率响应相当线性。然而,在声音画面中没有出现低频。还可通过USB-C端口和蓝牙5.1提供有线或无线耳机解决方案。
CAT S75 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Gigaset GX6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命--带无线充电的Cat S75
消耗功率
Cat S75的电池容量为5000毫安时,可以选择通过USB-C或无线方式充电--两者的功率都高达15瓦。对于户外手机来说,其耗电量并不明显。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1.1 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt |
Load |
3.2 / 5.2 Watt |
CAT S75 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -15% | -7% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.9 ? 18% | 0.896 ? 19% |
Idle Average * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 1.35 ? 10% | 1.449 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.9 | 1.8 5% | 1.85 ? 3% | 1.629 ? 14% |
Load Average * | 3.2 | 4.7 -47% | 4 ? -25% | 5.51 ? -72% |
Load Maximum * | 5.2 | 8.1 -56% | 7.45 ? -43% | 8.19 ? -58% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的WLAN测试中,调整后的显示亮度为150cd/m2,Cat S75持续了大约15个小时,即使是重度用户在户外使用时也应该没有问题。
CAT S75 5000 mAh | CAT S53 5500 mAh | Gigaset GX6 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 896 | 1135 27% | 1002 12% | 768 -14% |
Pros
Cons
判决书
Cat S75是一款强大的智能手机,凭借其卫星通信支持在竞争中脱颖而出。通过安装的联发科芯片使用开放的3GPP-NTN标准使用卫星服务的可能性,价格略低于600欧元(约600美元),但需要付费包月才能使用全部功能。
然而,那些对卡特彼勒的户外手机感兴趣的人应该知道,这一功能和高水平的耐用性必须享有较高的个人优先权,因为在许多领域,Cat S75的操作技术水平相当于廉价的中档手机(显示屏和光学系统甚至更糟)。
对于那些远离文明的人来说,尽管Cat S75在硬件上有缺陷,但它是一个有趣的技术作品。
如果你正在为建筑工地或野外旅行寻找一个强大的手机,但对卫星支持不感兴趣,你会发现一个很好的解决方案,三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 或Gigaset GX6 - 耐用的替代品,设计更现代,可更换电池。
CAT S75
-
05/11/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.