Notebookcheck Logo

卡特彼勒CAT S75评测--带卫星通讯和水下摄像头的户外智能手机

现代性与过去的时代相遇。 Cat S75是一款真正的坚固耐用的户外电话,具有高IP认证和军事保护标准。然而,Cat智能手机的亮点是与地球静止轨道卫星的通信,这应该比Apple"的卫星紧急呼叫更有优势。
Android Touchscreen Smartphone
测试CAT S75智能手机

据制造商称,Cat S75的建议售价为599欧元,是有史以来最可靠的Cat智能手机。这款户外手机的外壳通过了IP68以及IP69K标准的认证,还能抵御极端温度、湿度和振动。

Cat S75有一个6.6英寸、120赫兹的IPS显示屏和一个带水下模式的三摄像头设置。这款坚固耐用的手机由一个 联发科Dimensity 930,它有6GB的内存和128GB的闪存。最新的Cat后代的特殊功能是Bullitt卫星连接功能,它可以与静止卫星进行通信。

CAT S75 (S Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 930 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
IMG BXM-8-256
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.58 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, IPS LCD, gorilla glass Victus, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 93 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, Card Reader: microSD slot (up to 128GB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass,, FM radio, miracast, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, Sattelite: 23/255/256; 5G: N1/N2/N3/N5/N7/N8/N20/N28/N38/N40/ N41/N75/N77/N78; 4G: 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32/38/39/40/41; 3G: 1/2/4/5/8; 2G: 2/3/5/8, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.9 x 171 x 80
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/​1.8, Videos @1080p/​30fps) + 8 MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens) + 2 MP (f/​2.4, macro lens)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/​2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, charger, USB cable, car adapter, info material, Cat UI, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
268 g
Price
599 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.7 %
05/2023
CAT S75
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256
268 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080
78.3 %
04/2023
CAT S53
SD 480, Adreno 619
320 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
82.6 %
12/2022
Gigaset GX6
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
278 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080
81.9 %
08/2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L
235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
Cat S75只有一种颜色可供选择。
Cat S75只有一种颜色可供选择。

Cat S75的重点是高稳定性和抗摔性,但显示屏与表面的比率仅有76.7%,很受影响。这款来自卡特彼勒的耐用智能手机通过了IP-68/69K和MIL-STD-810H的认证--你可以在这里阅读有关军事标准及其缺点https://www.notebookcheck.com/Bekommt-die-Smartphone-Landschaft-mit-dem-MIL-STD-810-einen-neuen-Schutzstandard.396881.0.html.

Cat S75的做工处于良好水平,但这款户外手机并没有真正意义上的高质量。然而,根据制造商的说法,塑料外壳可以用刷子和消毒湿巾清洗,还含有抗菌银离子。IP69K认证甚至可以保护Cat S75在短距离高压清洗时不受热水影响。

测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机

尺寸比较

171 mm 81 mm 16 mm 320 g171 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 268 g170.7 mm 82.2 mm 11.9 mm 278 g168.8 mm 79.9 mm 9.9 mm 235 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - CAT S75带卫星电话

这款户外手机的功能包括Miracast、一个状态LED、蓝牙5.1和NFC。外围设备也可以通过USB-C端口使用OTG适配器连接。USB接口使用慢速2.0标准进行数据传输。

Cat S75只有6GB内存和128GB内部UFS存储的版本。需要更多存储空间的人可以通过microSD卡进行扩展。

微型SD卡读卡器

集成的microSD插槽支持当前的SDHC和SDXC标准,但内存只能增加128GB。结合我们的参考卡Angelbird AV PRO V60,这款户外手机在跨平台磁盘测试中的表现相当令人信服。然而,Cat S75的复制速度很慢,不到20MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
37.8 MB/s +96%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
30.6 MB/s +59%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.9 MB/s +45%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
19.3 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
CAT S75 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.6 (23.7-44.1)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø41.8 (28.1-52.6)
CAT S75 IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.9 (53.3-85.6)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.5 (53.1-77.5)

软件--户外智能手机与Android 12

这款猫咪智能手机装运的是谷歌的操作系统Android 12。制造商宣传说对其坚固耐用的手机有五年的更新支持,但只计划进行两次主要的Android 更新。相应地,供应将在下一个Android 代14结束。

安全更新可使用三年,但只有关键的安全漏洞会在另外两年内得到修复。在测试时,Cat S75的安全补丁从2023年2月起已经过时。

测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机

通信和GNSS - CAT S75与5G

卡特彼勒公司的耐用手机除了支持高级手机必须的4G和5G之外,还可以通过Bullitt Satellite Messenger实现卫星通信(NTN)。这项卫星服务,但没有短信,可以在购买Cat智能手机后的12个月内免费使用。在这之后,必须进行订阅,每月费用高达60欧元。

与其依赖一个专有的卫星网络,不如使用 Apple iPhone 14 Pro由于采用了联发科芯片,Cat S75通过传统的3GPP NTN信号进行通信,因此可以根据哪颗卫星实现最佳连接质量,使用不同供应商的卫星。因此,即使在没有移动网络的情况下,用户应该总是能够发送和接收短信,并拨打紧急电话。

这款户外手机只提供家庭Wi-Fi网络内的Wi-Fi 5,结合我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000,只够平均传输速率低于400Mbps。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=205, last 2 years)
648 MBit/s +88%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
614 (544min - 640max) MBit/s +78%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 (331min - 351max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=206, last 2 years)
683 MBit/s +84%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
682 (353min - 727max) MBit/s +83%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
372 (353min - 388max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=56, last 2 years)
1543 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
944 (866min - 952max) MBit/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
892 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=56, last 2 years)
1376 MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
910 (677min - 949max) MBit/s
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
743 MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (866-952)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 642L; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø910 (677-949)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (331-351)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø372 (353-388)
在户外测试GPS
在户外测试GPS
在室内测试GPS
在室内测试GPS

Cat S75使用卫星网络GPS、BeiDou、Galileo和Glonass双频以及SBAS进行定位。这款手机在户外提供了良好的准确性。我们还检查了在自行车旅行中的定位精度,并将结果与Garmin的Venu 2智能手表进行比较。 Cat S75的路线与参考设备的路线非常接近。

测试GPS Cat S75
测试GPS Cat S75
测试GPS Garmin Venu 2
测试GPS Garmin Venu 2

电话和语音质量--双SIM卡的耐用电话

测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机

Cat S75通过移动网络的通话质量,包括VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话,都很好,内置的麦克风可以大声清晰地传输声音。在测试中,通过安装的前置摄像头进行视频通话也没有问题。这款户外手机支持双卡,但在使用卫星服务时需要占用一个卡槽。

相机 - CAT S75,50MP

Cat S75在白天可以做出漂亮的飞蝇。
Cat S75在白天可以做出漂亮的飞蝇。

后置的主摄像头有一个f/1.8的开放光圈。5千万像素的图像传感器提供了坚实的照片质量,至少在明亮的光线条件下。然而,考虑到这个价格范围,锐度和图像细节都不是真正令人信服的。后置摄像头单元在低光照条件下也只有一个适度的好成绩。随着光线的减少,模糊度明显增加--这也适用于低分辨率的超广角镜头在白天的情况。

然而,据制造商称,Cat S75的亮点在于其双摄像头单元是防水的,甚至可以承受五米深的水压而不受损害。这款户外手机还搭载了相应的水下模式。

广角
广角
主摄像头
主摄像头
3倍变焦
3倍变焦
5倍变焦(最大)
5倍变焦(最大)
宏观
宏观
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide-angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
ColorChecker CAT S75: 6.45 ∆E min: 1.98 - max: 10.79 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
32.9 ∆E
45.8 ∆E
58.1 ∆E
49.4 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
60.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
44.7 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
71.9 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
72.2 ∆E
67.7 ∆E
50.2 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
24 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker CAT S75: 44.8 ∆E min: 13.76 - max: 72.23 ∆E

配件和保修 - 户外手机不含电源适配器

我们的Cat S75在交货范围内既没有充电器也没有汽车适配器。此外,显示器上也没有保护膜。盒子里只有一条USB线和信息资料。

制造商为其智能手机提供24个月的保修。对其智能手机提供24个月的保修,在有CAT服务的地方,该保修在全球范围内有效。在紧急情况下,客户和帮助服务(危机应对中心)也可以通过Bullitt卫星信使以200多种语言一年365天提供。

输入和操作 - 带有指纹传感器的坚固手机

Cat S75提供两个可编程的按键,可用于按压式通话和紧急呼叫。这款户外手机有一个电容式触摸屏,具有令人信服的滑行特性。在精确度方面也没有什么可抱怨的,所以我们用手指的输入都能准确实现。

集成在背面的指纹传感器可以可靠地解锁这款坚固耐用的手机。从待机模式到显示屏打开的时间也足够短。还提供了通过前置摄像头(2D)的FaceUnlock功能,在良好的照明条件下可以很快识别用户。

测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机

显示屏 - 带有IPS的户外手机

子像素结构
子像素结构

Cat S75配备了一个6.58英寸的IPS显示屏,其分辨率达到了不寻常的2408 x 1080像素。实现的像素密度略高于400 ppi大关。这款Cat智能手机没有使用脉冲宽度调制(PWM)进行亮度控制。

这款坚固耐用的智能手机在亮度方面只能在有限的范围内说服人。我们在纯白的背景上测得的最大亮度为580cd/m²--从竞争者的角度来看,这是一个不错的比率,但对于一款为户外使用而设计的手机来说,仍然很低。即使是采用AMOLED屏幕的廉价中档手机,如 Redmi Note 12屏,也能照得更亮。在更现实的APL18测量中,在黑暗区域,它几乎是相同的602 cd/m²。

480
cd/m²
508
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
511
cd/m²
566
cd/m²
531
cd/m²
525
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
536
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 580 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 529.2 cd/m² Minimum: 10.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 566 cd/m²
Contrast: 1204:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.248
CAT S75
IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.58
CAT S53
IPS, 1600x720, 6.50
Gigaset GX6
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-0%
18%
-30%
43%
Brightness middle
566
476
-16%
505
-11%
510
-10%
650
15%
Brightness
529
504
-5%
491
-7%
495
-6%
658
24%
Brightness Distribution
83
82
-1%
93
12%
92
11%
97
17%
Black Level *
0.47
0.6
-28%
0.3
36%
0.46
2%
Contrast
1204
793
-34%
1683
40%
1109
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.02
3.18
37%
4.32
14%
7.41
-48%
1.55
69%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.6
5.86
39%
7.22
25%
13.26
-38%
2.59
73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.4
4.2
5%
3
32%
10.6
-141%
1.8
59%
Gamma
2.248 98%
2.268 97%
2.268 97%
2.518 87%
2.194 100%
CCT
7173 91%
7234 90%
7098 92%
10050 65%
6316 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在我们的显示测量中,Cat S75的IPS面板实现了0.47cd/m²的稳固黑值。超过1000:1的对比度仍然令人满意。

显示分析是在光谱仪和Calman软件的帮助下进行的。色彩(5.0)和灰度(4.4)再现的偏差应被评为高,与参考色的差异是清晰可见的。

色彩精度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩精度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
彩色公羊(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
彩色公羊(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩饱和度(目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
15.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 5.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.9 ms rise
↘ 18.9 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

这款户外手机在户外留下了坚实的印象,但显示内容在阳光直射下几乎看不到。在平视角度下,IPS面板的颜色很稳定,但显示屏看起来有点褪色。

测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机
测试CAT S75智能手机

性能 - CAT S75采用联发科SoC系统

在Cat S75内部工作的是一个 联发科Dimensity 930,包括一个Imagination IMG BXM-8-256作为图形单元。该系统的速度在日常使用中是足够的,但小的滞后仍然存在。

亮度930的性能 Dimensity 930的性能低于 骁龙778G中的 三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro,特别是在Geekbench的多分数中,联发科SoC在这个价格范围内得分很弱。这同样适用于2014年发布的图形单元。IMG BXM-8-256甚至无法跟上高通公司的中端GPU--Adreno 642L。 Adreno 642L在GFXBench中提供几乎两倍于Cat S75的速率。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=214, last 2 years)
900 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +21%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
693 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (641 - 698, n=2)
670 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
641 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
510 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=214, last 2 years)
2947 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +57%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2095 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (1787 - 1909, n=2)
1848 Points +3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1787 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1642 Points -8%
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2531, n=44, last 2 years)
1279 Points +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (832 - 916, n=2)
874 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
832 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
684 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 6460, n=44, last 2 years)
3412 Points +71%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (1998 - 2306, n=2)
2152 Points +8%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1998 Points
CAT S53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1787 Points -11%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=151, last 2 years)
738649 Points +87%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
505982 Points +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (394141 - 430895, n=2)
412518 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
394141 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
12444 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12113 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
 
11787 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=209, last 2 years)
11643 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=160, last 2 years)
830 Points +37%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (606 - 612, n=2)
609 Points 0%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
606 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=162, last 2 years)
5686 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4079 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (3527 - 3771, n=2)
3649 Points +3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
3527 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=162, last 2 years)
9595 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
8858 Points +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (6635 - 6979, n=2)
6807 Points +3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
6635 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=162, last 2 years)
6206 Points +43%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (4352 - 4955, n=2)
4654 Points +7%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4352 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
3988 Points -8%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=162, last 2 years)
13856 Points +222%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6594 Points +53%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4298 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (4011 - 4298, n=2)
4155 Points -3%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=162, last 2 years)
1487 Points +17%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (1276 - 1457, n=2)
1367 Points +7%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1276 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1188 Points -7%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=146, last 2 years)
21887 Points +334%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (5039 - 5507, n=2)
5273 Points +5%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
5039 Points
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=99, last 2 years)
16322 Points +1613%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
953 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
  (877 - 953, n=2)
915 Points -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3068 Points +3%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2986 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4050 Points +47%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2754 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3781 Points +36%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +69%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
60 fps -6%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -6%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 fps +81%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
102 fps +40%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
82 fps +12%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +31%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
58 fps +12%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps +4%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps +26%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64 fps +5%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
54 fps +200%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +167%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps +106%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +100%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps +50%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +4%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +81%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +75%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps +31%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +94%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps +47%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +90%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps +90%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps +60%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +97%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps +67%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.6 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.5 fps -2%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps +82%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +76%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps +41%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +70%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
28 fps +40%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
18 fps -10%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +127%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.4 fps +69%
CAT S53
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.9 fps +12%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=170, last 2 years)
103.9 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
72.887 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (64.7 - 77.1, n=2)
70.9 Points +10%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
64.737 Points
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=154, last 2 years)
104.4 runs/min +137%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104)
53.8 runs/min +22%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (44.1 - 58.4, n=2)
51.3 runs/min +16%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
44.1 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=153, last 2 years)
98.7 Points +43%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (69 - 86, n=2)
77.5 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
74 Points +7%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
69 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=119, last 2 years)
131 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
104 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (93 - 110, n=2)
101.5 Points +9%
CAT S75 (Chromee 114)
93 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=205, last 2 years)
33314 Points +64%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
25445 Points +25%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (20342 - 26766, n=2)
23554 Points +16%
Gigaset GX6 (Chrome 107)
21753 Points +7%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
20342 Points
CAT S53 (Chrome 112)
18774 Points -8%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
1985.5 ms *
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930 (1466 - 1986, n=2)
1726 ms * +13%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
1708.8 ms * +14%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=168, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

CAT S75CAT S53Gigaset GX6Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-50%
-37%
-24%
-27%
24%
Sequential Read 256KB
991.21
510.9
-48%
953.5
-4%
841.6
-15%
704 ?(303 - 1038, n=60)
-29%
1471 ?(215 - 4512, n=213, last 2 years)
48%
Sequential Write 256KB
878.23
208.2
-76%
454.7
-48%
484.7
-45%
517 ?(105.3 - 903, n=60)
-41%
1084 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=213, last 2 years)
23%
Random Read 4KB
221.56
140.7
-36%
194.9
-12%
170.6
-23%
187.2 ?(89.3 - 297, n=60)
-16%
243 ?(22.2 - 543, n=213, last 2 years)
10%
Random Write 4KB
233.91
141.4
-40%
39.9
-83%
204.2
-13%
181.7 ?(68.8 - 419, n=60)
-22%
267 ?(13 - 709, n=213, last 2 years)
14%

游戏--Cat S75管理120 fps

我们使用GameBench应用程序检查Cat S75的图形性能和来自Play Store的三个Android 游戏。我们的第一个测试游戏,PUBG Mobile,只能在中等细节(HD)下玩--UHD设置是不可选择的。这款射击游戏的渲染速度为30帧/秒,在最低的细节设置下可以达到40帧/秒。

要求不高的游戏,如《死亡扳机2》,以120帧的速度接近原生帧率运行。然而,竞技场射击游戏Armajet显示出较大的波动,帧率严重下降到30帧以下。

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
CAT S75; Armajet: Ø82.3 (24-120)
CAT S75; Dead Trigger 2: Ø115.8 (101-120)
CAT S75; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø29.4 (22-31)
CAT S75; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø39.5 (34-41)

排放 - 户外电话保持凉爽

温度

在我们的稳定性测试场景中,Cat S75的机箱几乎没有升温--我们只在背部测量到37.2℃的峰值。3DMark的压力测试并不支持 联发科SoC因此,我们无法为这台户外手机提供测试。

Max. Load
 37.9 °C35.3 °C32.2 °C 
 38 °C33.4 °C32.2 °C 
 37.6 °C34.1 °C31.8 °C 
Maximum: 38 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
32 °C34.7 °C36.8 °C
32.4 °C35.5 °C37.2 °C
32 °C33.8 °C37 °C
Maximum: 37.2 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.6 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.7 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

演讲者

卡特彼勒公司的这款坚固的手机依靠两个扬声器,其音量超过85分贝。我们的测量结果显示,Cat S75的中音和高音的频率响应相当线性。然而,在声音画面中没有出现低频。还可通过USB-C端口和蓝牙5.1提供有线或无线耳机解决方案。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.432.62528.228.73126.623.84026.624.75032.430.96322.522.7801722.110025.529.112521.23716019.140.22001544.525014.748.831513.755.640011.36250014.760.663016.266.880016.571100014.375.5125012.175.8160011.672.6200011.174.1250013.672.9315021.474.1400024.870.650002873.8630023.467.3800023.168.11000020.865.71250023.470.7160002260.3SPL33.584.5N1.558.7median 16.5median 67.3Delta4.49.639.441.139.143.531.537.629.832.433.438.126.630.922.320.720.52415.627.514.733.711.437.21043.28.848.6953.610.558.312.262.514.366.411.670.11271.410.271.210.465.111.165.812.769.614.466.214.268.214.769.515.668.816.567.816.558.417.348.325.480.20.646.6median 12.7median 65.12.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCAT S75Gigaset GX6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
CAT S75 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigaset GX6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--带无线充电的Cat S75

消耗功率

Cat S75的电池容量为5000毫安时,可以选择通过USB-C或无线方式充电--两者的功率都高达15瓦。对于户外手机来说,其耗电量并不明显。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.5 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 3.2 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
CAT S75
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 930
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-7%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.9
18%
0.9 ?(0.7 - 1.1, n=2)
18%
0.896 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=159, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Average *
1.5
1.4
7%
1.35 ?(1.2 - 1.5, n=2)
10%
1.449 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=159, last 2 years)
3%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
1.8
5%
1.85 ?(1.8 - 1.9, n=2)
3%
1.629 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=159, last 2 years)
14%
Load Average *
3.2
4.7
-47%
4 ?(3.2 - 4.8, n=2)
-25%
5.51 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=159, last 2 years)
-72%
Load Maximum *
5.2
8.1
-56%
7.45 ?(5.2 - 9.7, n=2)
-43%
8.19 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=159, last 2 years)
-58%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.39 (1.13-5.16)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.72 (2.8-9.91)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.696 (1.536-1.941)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.385 (1.097-2.05)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.59 (2.23-4)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.65 (5.06-7.73)
CAT S75 MediaTek Dimensity 930; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.696 (1.536-1.941)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.385 (1.097-2.05)

电池寿命

在我们的WLAN测试中,调整后的显示亮度为150cd/m2,Cat S75持续了大约15个小时,即使是重度用户在户外使用时也应该没有问题。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
14h 56min
CAT S75
5000 mAh
CAT S53
5500 mAh
Gigaset GX6
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
896
1135
27%
1002
12%
768
-14%

Pros

+ 高标准的保护
+ 卫星通信
+ 运行时间长
+ 坚固的外壳
+ 可编程的特殊按键

Cons

- 宽大的显示边框
- 中等的显示亮度
- 旧的Android 12+只有两个升级计划
- 在这个价格范围内,蹩脚的SoC

判决书

在审查中:Cat S75。测试设备由cyberport.de提供
在审查中:Cat S75。测试设备由cyberport.de提供

Cat S75是一款强大的智能手机,凭借其卫星通信支持在竞争中脱颖而出。通过安装的联发科芯片使用开放的3GPP-NTN标准使用卫星服务的可能性,价格略低于600欧元(约600美元),但需要付费包月才能使用全部功能。

然而,那些对卡特彼勒的户外手机感兴趣的人应该知道,这一功能和高水平的耐用性必须享有较高的个人优先权,因为在许多领域,Cat S75的操作技术水平相当于廉价的中档手机(显示屏和光学系统甚至更糟)。

对于那些远离文明的人来说,尽管Cat S75在硬件上有缺陷,但它是一个有趣的技术作品。

如果你正在为建筑工地或野外旅行寻找一个强大的手机,但对卫星支持不感兴趣,你会发现一个很好的解决方案,三星Galaxy XCover 6 ProGigaset GX6 - 耐用的替代品,设计更现代,可更换电池。

价格和可用性

Cat S75的价格为599欧元,其中在数码港亚马逊有售。.买家可以免费使用三个月的卫星功能,每月最多可接收30条信息。

CAT S75 - 05/11/2023 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
71 / 75 → 95%
Pointing Device
90%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
87%
Battery
91%
Display
83%
Games Performance
26 / 64 → 40%
Application Performance
77 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
58%
Average
75%
80%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 卡特彼勒CAT S75评测--带卫星通讯和水下摄像头的户外智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 2023-05-16 (Update: 2023-05-16)