Notebookcheck Logo

Blackview P2 智能手机简短评测

没有键盘的Blackviewberry。 中国厂商 Blackview 的名字看上去是受正式名称为RIM的加拿大厂商的启发而起的。但有着简单名字“P2”的智能手机却没有希望使用键盘来给大家留下深刻的印象,而是通过优秀的配置及高容量的电池。参数看上去很有想法,但这就够了吗?
Android ARM Chinese Tech Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen
Blackview P2 (P Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT6750 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T860 MP2
Memory
4 GB 
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 51 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: 最大 32 GB microSD 卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 光线传感器, 距离传感器, 加速度传感器, 罗盘, USB Type-C, OTG
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz , WCDMA 900/2100MHz , FDD-LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.4 x 154 x 77
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 两小时即可充满, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 17 h, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 10 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 960 h
Operating System
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix 闪光灯以及自动对焦
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 1.5 瓦, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 耳机, 保护壳, OTG 数据线, 替换贴膜, unbekannt Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
230 g, Power Supply: 91 g
Price
160 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oukitel U16 Max
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.7 MBit/s +1%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 MBit/s
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
53.2 MBit/s -46%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.6 MBit/s -50%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel U16 Max
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.1 MBit/s +26%
Blackview P2
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash
78.7 MBit/s
ZTE Blade V8
Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash
54.5 MBit/s -31%
Blackview R6
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41.9 MBit/s -47%
Blackview GPS
Blackview GPS
Blackview GPS
Blackview GPS
Blackview GPS
Blackview GPS
Garmin Edge GPS
Garmin Edge GPS
Garmin Edge GPS
Garmin Edge GPS
Garmin Edge GPS
Garmin Edge GPS
Picture with front camera.
Picture with front camera.
The same subject with the main camera.
The same subject with the main camera.
Some details are surprisingly sharp.
Some details are surprisingly sharp.
Red and green as seen with main camera.
Red and green as seen with main camera.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
Gray is not really gray and details are difficult to see.
Gray is not really gray and details are difficult to see.
The fact that you can see details at all is due to the high resolution, not image sharpness.
The fact that you can see details at all is due to the high resolution, not image sharpness.
Color deviation is not overpowering.
Color deviation is not overpowering.
390
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
424
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 459 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 419.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 2827:1 (Black: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 14.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.28
Blackview P2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
ZTE Blade V8
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.20
Blackview R6
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50
Oukitel U16 Max
1280x720, 6.00
Screen
-23%
-18%
-12%
Brightness middle
424
482
14%
352
-17%
417
-2%
Brightness
420
448
7%
320
-24%
405
-4%
Brightness Distribution
85
79
-7%
81
-5%
94
11%
Black Level *
0.15
0.64
-327%
0.3
-100%
0.21
-40%
Contrast
2827
753
-73%
1173
-59%
1986
-30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
9.5
4
58%
8.7
8%
11.9
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
19.7
6.5
67%
15.1
23%
21.5
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
14.5
3.4
77%
10.5
28%
14.4
1%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.13 103%
2.04 108%
2.19 100%
CCT
10840 60%
6774 96%
8529 76%
12820 51%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
41852 Points
ZTE Blade V8
45868 Points +10%
Blackview R6
38038 Points -9%
Oukitel U16 Max
38295 Points -8%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
577 Points
Blackview R6
626 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8
2308 Points
Blackview R6
1390 Points
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
9496 Points
ZTE Blade V8
9932 Points +5%
Blackview R6
5731 Points -40%
Oukitel U16 Max
Points -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
9604 Points
ZTE Blade V8
10271 Points +7%
Blackview R6
5380 Points -44%
Oukitel U16 Max
Points -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P2
9612 Points
ZTE Blade V8
8905 Points -7%
Blackview R6
7424 Points -23%
Oukitel U16 Max
10549 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview P2
546 Points
ZTE Blade V8
613 Points +12%
Blackview R6
258 Points -53%
Oukitel U16 Max
300 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P2
482 Points
ZTE Blade V8
542 Points +12%
Blackview R6
217 Points -55%
Oukitel U16 Max
248 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P2
1030 Points
ZTE Blade V8
1127 Points +9%
Blackview R6
762 Points -26%
Oukitel U16 Max
1098 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Blackview P2
387 Points
ZTE Blade V8
318 Points -18%
Blackview R6
169 Points -56%
Oukitel U16 Max
208 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P2
328 Points
ZTE Blade V8
263 Points -20%
Blackview R6
138 Points -58%
Oukitel U16 Max
169 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P2
1055 Points
ZTE Blade V8
1214 Points +15%
Blackview R6
814 Points -23%
Oukitel U16 Max
1104 Points +5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2
16 fps
ZTE Blade V8
9.7 fps -39%
Blackview R6
9.7 fps -39%
Oukitel U16 Max
20 fps +25%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2
16 fps
ZTE Blade V8
11 fps -31%
Blackview R6
9.8 fps -39%
Oukitel U16 Max
12 fps -25%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview P2
6.7 fps
ZTE Blade V8
4.5 fps -33%
Blackview R6
4 fps -40%
Oukitel U16 Max
9.2 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2
6.7 fps
ZTE Blade V8
4.6 fps -31%
Blackview R6
4 fps -40%
Oukitel U16 Max
2.9 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2
4.4 fps
ZTE Blade V8
4.9 fps +11%
Blackview R6
2.6 fps -41%
Oukitel U16 Max
6.5 fps +48%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2
4.4 fps
ZTE Blade V8
2.4 fps -45%
Blackview R6
2.5 fps -43%
Oukitel U16 Max
2.9 fps -34%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
3667 Points
ZTE Blade V8
4978 Points +36%
Blackview R6
2759 Points -25%
Oukitel U16 Max
4040 Points +10%
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
1430 Points
Oukitel U16 Max
1637 Points +14%
Storage score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
2451 Points
Oukitel U16 Max
2338 Points -5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
2782 Points
ZTE Blade V8
3815 Points +37%
Oukitel U16 Max
3042 Points +9%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview P2
298 Points
ZTE Blade V8
928 Points +211%
Blackview R6
177 Points -41%
Oukitel U16 Max
785 Points +163%
System (sort by value)
Blackview P2
1623 Points
ZTE Blade V8
1562 Points -4%
Blackview R6
562 Points -65%
Oukitel U16 Max
1776 Points +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview P2
831 Points
ZTE Blade V8
812 Points -2%
Blackview R6
472 Points -43%
Oukitel U16 Max
781 Points -6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P2
620 Points
ZTE Blade V8
787 Points +27%
Blackview R6
383 Points -38%
Oukitel U16 Max
433 Points -30%
Web (sort by value)
Blackview P2
9 Points
ZTE Blade V8
744 Points +8167%
Blackview R6
10 Points +11%
Oukitel U16 Max
633 Points +6933%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
2838 Points
ZTE Blade V8
2826 Points 0%
Blackview R6
3195 Points +13%
Oukitel U16 Max
2734 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Blackview P2
13174 ms *
ZTE Blade V8
12297 ms * +7%
Blackview R6
11227 ms * +15%
Oukitel U16 Max
21899 ms * -66%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2
20.48 Points
ZTE Blade V8
17.52 Points -14%
Blackview R6
21.9 Points +7%
Oukitel U16 Max
16.72 Points -18%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview P2
19.61 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8
87.1 MB/s +344%
Blackview R6
9.34 MB/s -52%
Oukitel U16 Max
24.56 MB/s +25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview P2
34.26 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8
96.5 MB/s +182%
Blackview R6
22.74 MB/s -34%
Oukitel U16 Max
36.27 MB/s +6%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2
9.54 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8
12.69 MB/s +33%
Blackview R6
13.5 MB/s +42%
Oukitel U16 Max
11.24 MB/s +18%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2
22.07 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8
39.89 MB/s +81%
Blackview R6
18.73 MB/s -15%
Oukitel U16 Max
18.5 MB/s -16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2
133.8 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8
77.7 MB/s -42%
Blackview R6
76.1 MB/s -43%
Oukitel U16 Max
69.9 MB/s -48%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2
264.8 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8
278.1 MB/s +5%
Blackview R6
228 MB/s -14%
Oukitel U16 Max
231.1 MB/s -13%

Legend

 
Blackview P2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview R6 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U16 Max Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 40.5 °C40.3 °C37.8 °C 
 41.5 °C40.7 °C41.2 °C 
 41.1 °C40.9 °C41.9 °C 
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 40.7 °C
36.8 °C37.6 °C39 °C
37.1 °C37.7 °C40.5 °C
36.7 °C38.3 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 38.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.629.62525.436.33125.325.44032.924.45033.630.46331.6298028.431.21002736.812520.830.51602224.120021.326.425020.830.631521.236.740019.444.350019.551.863017.757.480017.963.3100017.870125017.369.6160017.467.4200016.766250017.272.9315018.273.5400017.971.6500017.672.9630017.771800017.855.81000017.950.41250018.147.41600018.245SPL3080.8N1.346.4median 17.9median 55.8Delta1.41531.641.525.435.525.332.132.930.233.632.931.626.228.429.42725.420.823.32225.721.324.420.833.321.24419.452.919.559.117.764.517.968.717.870.417.372.817.472.916.77217.270.718.271.417.975.817.670.717.762.517.857.117.952.618.142.618.2343082.81.349median 17.9median 59.11.415.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseBlackview P2Oukitel U16 Max
Blackview P2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.51 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.99 / 2.04 / 2.12 Watt
Load midlight 3.77 / 5.78 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)
9h 23min
Blackview P2
6000 mAh
ZTE Blade V8
2730 mAh
Blackview R6
3000 mAh
Oukitel U16 Max
4000 mAh
Honor 6X
3340 mAh
Battery Runtime
-44%
-54%
-31%
-10%
Reader / Idle
1957
964
-51%
1573
-20%
2250
15%
WiFi v1.3
1083
700
-35%
604
-44%
731
-33%
957
-12%
Load
563
297
-47%
203
-64%
346
-39%
375
-33%
H.264
545
885

Pros

+ 吸引人的设计
+ 不错的价格
+ 大屏幕
+ 坚固的金属外壳
+ 极出色的电池续航时间
+ 存储最大可扩展到128GB
+ 双卡
+ 4G内存
+ 64GB eMMC存储
+ 高质量扬声器

Cons

-
- 相机只能满足快速闪照所要求的成像质量
- 仅有Android 6.0
- 中庸的耳机质量
- 不明了的保修政策
- 很难看到Android的按键
Review: the Blackview P2. Test unit provided by Blackview.
Review: the Blackview P2. Test unit provided by Blackview.

这台Blackview最大的缺点很容易发现:它太重了。除了这点以外,没有其大的问题。经得起时间考验的设计,不抓人眼球但也不显得无趣。屏幕透亮,机身坚固。别用高出四倍价格的产品来比较它的摄像头;考虑到价格,这台设备有着很好的配置:4GB运存和64GB的eMMC闪存,处理器速度也不错。如果你找的是一台价格合理,机身坚固,配置不错的智能手机,而且你不在乎他的重量,那么这台设备会是一个正确的选择。

一个“镇纸“,有着不错的配置和高性价比。

多花一些钱从当经销商购买是也许是正确的选择因为Blackview并不提供保修。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Blackview P2 - 06/20/2017 v6(old)
Florian Schaar

Chassis
84%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
42 / 60 → 70%
Weight
88%
Battery
100%
Display
79%
Games Performance
19 / 63 → 31%
Application Performance
34 / 70 → 49%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
63%
Average
70%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Blackview P2 智能手机简短评测
Florian Schaar, 2017-07-14 (Update: 2017-07-14)