Blackview P2 智能手机简短评测

Name: Blackview P2
Brand: Blackview

没有键盘的Blackviewberry。 中国厂商 Blackview 的名字看上去是受正式名称为RIM的加拿大厂商的启发而起的。但有着简单名字“P2”的智能手机却没有希望使用键盘来给大家留下深刻的印象，而是通过优秀的配置及高容量的电池。参数看上去很有想法，但这就够了吗？

Florian Schaar, ✓ Tanja Hinum (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 07/14/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Chinese Tech Phablet Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Blackview

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Blackview P2 (P Series)

Processor

Mediatek MT6750 8 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

Memory

4 GB

Display

5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 电容屏, IPS, glossy: yes

Storage

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: 最大 32 GB microSD 卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 光线传感器, 距离传感器, 加速度传感器, 罗盘, USB Type-C, OTG

Networking

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz , WCDMA 900/2100MHz , FDD-LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 10.4 x 154 x 77

Battery

6000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 两小时即可充满, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 17 h, Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 30 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 10 h, Standby 2G (according to manufacturer): 960 h

Operating System

Android 6.0 Marshmallow

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix 闪光灯以及自动对焦
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 1.5 瓦, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 耳机, 保护壳, OTG 数据线, 替换贴膜, unbekannt Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

230 g, Power Supply: 91 g

Price

160 Euro

Links

Blackview homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Oukitel U16 Max Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	99.7 MBit/s +1%
Blackview P2 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	98.5 MBit/s
ZTE Blade V8 Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	53.2 MBit/s -46%
Blackview R6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash	49.6 MBit/s -50%
iperf3 receive AX12
Oukitel U16 Max Mali-T720 MP2, MT6753, 32 GB eMMC Flash	99.1 MBit/s +26%
Blackview P2 Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750, 64 GB eMMC Flash	78.7 MBit/s
ZTE Blade V8 Adreno 505, 435, 32 GB eMMC Flash	54.5 MBit/s -31%
Blackview R6 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737T, 32 GB eMMC Flash	41.9 MBit/s -47%

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


390 cd/m²	396 cd/m²	414 cd/m²
408 cd/m²	424 cd/m²	459 cd/m²
414 cd/m²	422 cd/m²	450 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 459 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 419.7 cd/m² Minimum: 15.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 424 cd/m²
Contrast: 2827:1 (Black: 0.15 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 9.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 14.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.28
CCT: 10840 K

	Blackview P2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	ZTE Blade V8 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Blackview R6 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Oukitel U16 Max 1280x720, 6"
Screen		-23%	-18%	-12%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	424	482 14%	352 -17%	417 -2%
Brightness (cd/m²)	420	448 7%	320 -24%	405 -4%
Brightness Distribution (%)	85	79 -7%	81 -5%	94 11%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.15	0.64 -327%	0.3 -100%	0.21 -40%
Contrast (:1)	2827	753 -73%	1173 -59%	1986 -30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	9.5	4 58%	8.7 8%	11.9 -25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	19.7	6.5 67%	15.1 23%	21.5 -9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	14.5	3.4 77%	10.5 28%	14.4 1%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.13 ^103%	2.04 ^108%	2.19 ^100%
CCT	10840 ^60%	6774 ^96%	8529 ^76%	12820 ^51%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	41852 Points
ZTE Blade V8	45868 Points +10%
Blackview R6	38038 Points -9%
Oukitel U16 Max	38295 Points -8%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8	577 Points
Blackview R6	626 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Blade V8	2308 Points
Blackview R6	1390 Points

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	9496 Points
ZTE Blade V8	9932 Points +5%
Blackview R6	5731 Points -40%
Oukitel U16 Max	Points -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	9604 Points
ZTE Blade V8	10271 Points +7%
Blackview R6	5380 Points -44%
Oukitel U16 Max	Points -100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P2	9612 Points
ZTE Blade V8	8905 Points -7%
Blackview R6	7424 Points -23%
Oukitel U16 Max	10549 Points +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview P2	546 Points
ZTE Blade V8	613 Points +12%
Blackview R6	258 Points -53%
Oukitel U16 Max	300 Points -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P2	482 Points
ZTE Blade V8	542 Points +12%
Blackview R6	217 Points -55%
Oukitel U16 Max	248 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P2	1030 Points
ZTE Blade V8	1127 Points +9%
Blackview R6	762 Points -26%
Oukitel U16 Max	1098 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Blackview P2	387 Points
ZTE Blade V8	318 Points -18%
Blackview R6	169 Points -56%
Oukitel U16 Max	208 Points -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P2	328 Points
ZTE Blade V8	263 Points -20%
Blackview R6	138 Points -58%
Oukitel U16 Max	169 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Blackview P2	1055 Points
ZTE Blade V8	1214 Points +15%
Blackview R6	814 Points -23%
Oukitel U16 Max	1104 Points +5%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2	16 fps
ZTE Blade V8	9.7 fps -39%
Blackview R6	9.7 fps -39%
Oukitel U16 Max	20 fps +25%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2	16 fps
ZTE Blade V8	11 fps -31%
Blackview R6	9.8 fps -39%
Oukitel U16 Max	12 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview P2	6.7 fps
ZTE Blade V8	4.5 fps -33%
Blackview R6	4 fps -40%
Oukitel U16 Max	9.2 fps +37%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2	6.7 fps
ZTE Blade V8	4.6 fps -31%
Blackview R6	4 fps -40%
Oukitel U16 Max	2.9 fps -57%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2	4.4 fps
ZTE Blade V8	4.9 fps +11%
Blackview R6	2.6 fps -41%
Oukitel U16 Max	6.5 fps +48%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview P2	4.4 fps
ZTE Blade V8	2.4 fps -45%
Blackview R6	2.5 fps -43%
Oukitel U16 Max	2.9 fps -34%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	3667 Points
ZTE Blade V8	4978 Points +36%
Blackview R6	2759 Points -25%
Oukitel U16 Max	4040 Points +10%
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	1430 Points
Oukitel U16 Max	1637 Points +14%
Storage score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	2451 Points
Oukitel U16 Max	2338 Points -5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	2782 Points
ZTE Blade V8	3815 Points +37%
Oukitel U16 Max	3042 Points +9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview P2	298 Points
ZTE Blade V8	928 Points +211%
Blackview R6	177 Points -41%
Oukitel U16 Max	785 Points +163%
System (sort by value)
Blackview P2	1623 Points
ZTE Blade V8	1562 Points -4%
Blackview R6	562 Points -65%
Oukitel U16 Max	1776 Points +9%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview P2	831 Points
ZTE Blade V8	812 Points -2%
Blackview R6	472 Points -43%
Oukitel U16 Max	781 Points -6%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview P2	620 Points
ZTE Blade V8	787 Points +27%
Blackview R6	383 Points -38%
Oukitel U16 Max	433 Points -30%
Web (sort by value)
Blackview P2	9 Points
ZTE Blade V8	744 Points +8167%
Blackview R6	10 Points +11%
Oukitel U16 Max	633 Points +6933%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	2838 Points
ZTE Blade V8	2826 Points 0%
Blackview R6	3195 Points +13%
Oukitel U16 Max	2734 Points -4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Blackview P2	13174 ms *
ZTE Blade V8	12297 ms * +7%
Blackview R6	11227 ms * +15%
Oukitel U16 Max	21899 ms * -66%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview P2	20.48 Points
ZTE Blade V8	17.52 Points -14%
Blackview R6	21.9 Points +7%
Oukitel U16 Max	16.72 Points -18%

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview P2	19.61 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8	87.1 MB/s +344%
Blackview R6	9.34 MB/s -52%
Oukitel U16 Max	24.56 MB/s +25%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview P2	34.26 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8	96.5 MB/s +182%
Blackview R6	22.74 MB/s -34%
Oukitel U16 Max	36.27 MB/s +6%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2	9.54 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8	12.69 MB/s +33%
Blackview R6	13.5 MB/s +42%
Oukitel U16 Max	11.24 MB/s +18%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2	22.07 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8	39.89 MB/s +81%
Blackview R6	18.73 MB/s -15%
Oukitel U16 Max	18.5 MB/s -16%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2	133.8 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8	77.7 MB/s -42%
Blackview R6	76.1 MB/s -43%
Oukitel U16 Max	69.9 MB/s -48%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Blackview P2	264.8 MB/s
ZTE Blade V8	278.1 MB/s +5%
Blackview R6	228 MB/s -14%
Oukitel U16 Max	231.1 MB/s -13%

Legend

Blackview P2 Mediatek MT6750, ARM Mali-T860 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

ZTE Blade V8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Blackview R6 Mediatek MT6737T, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Oukitel U16 Max Mediatek MT6753, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


40.5 °C	40.3 °C	37.8 °C
41.5 °C	40.7 °C	41.2 °C
41.1 °C	40.9 °C	41.9 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 40.7 °C


36.8 °C	37.6 °C	39 °C
37.1 °C	37.7 °C	40.5 °C
36.7 °C	38.3 °C	40.2 °C

Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 38.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Blackview P2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.12 / 0.51 Watt
Idle	0.99 / 2.04 / 2.12 Watt
Load	3.77 / 5.78 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		32h 37min
WiFi Websurfing		18h 03min
Load (maximum brightness)		9h 23min

	Blackview P2 6000 mAh	ZTE Blade V8 2730 mAh	Blackview R6 3000 mAh	Oukitel U16 Max 4000 mAh	Honor 6X 3340 mAh
Battery runtime		-44%	-54%	-30%	-10%
Reader / Idle (h)	32.6	16.1 -51%		26.2 -20%	37.5 15%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	18.1	11.7 -35%	10.1 -44%	12.2 -33%	16 -12%
Load (h)	9.4	5 -47%	3.4 -64%	5.8 -38%	6.3 -33%
H.264 (h)		9.1			14.8

Pros

+ 吸引人的设计

+ 不错的价格

+ 大屏幕

+ 坚固的金属外壳

+ 极出色的电池续航时间

+ 存储最大可扩展到128GB

+ 双卡

+ 4G内存

+ 64GB eMMC存储

+ 高质量扬声器

Cons

- 重

- 相机只能满足快速闪照所要求的成像质量

- 仅有Android 6.0

- 中庸的耳机质量

- 不明了的保修政策

- 很难看到Android的按键

Review: the Blackview P2. Test unit provided by Blackview.

这台Blackview最大的缺点很容易发现：它太重了。除了这点以外，没有其大的问题。经得起时间考验的设计，不抓人眼球但也不显得无趣。屏幕透亮，机身坚固。别用高出四倍价格的产品来比较它的摄像头；考虑到价格，这台设备有着很好的配置：4GB运存和64GB的eMMC闪存，处理器速度也不错。如果你找的是一台价格合理，机身坚固，配置不错的智能手机，而且你不在乎他的重量，那么这台设备会是一个正确的选择。

一个“镇纸“，有着不错的配置和高性价比。

多花一些钱从当经销商购买是也许是正确的选择因为Blackview并不提供保修。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Blackview P2 - 06/20/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Schaar

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

87%

Connectivity

42 / 60 → 70%

Weight

88%

Battery

100%

Display

79%

Games Performance

19 / 63 → 31%

Application Performance

34 / 70 → 49%

Temperature

86%

Noise

100%

Audio

55 / 91 → 60%

Camera

63%

Average

70%

79%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Blackview P2 智能手机简短评测

Florian Schaar, 2017-07-14 (Update: 2017-07-14)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Blackview P2 audio analysis

Oukitel U16 Max audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Price comparison