Blackview A9 Pro 智能手机简短评测
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| 
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: 1351:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.33
CCT: 7343 K
| Blackview A9 Pro IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Oukitel U7 Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Blackview A8 Max IPS, 1280x720, 5.5" | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL IPS, 1280x720, 5.2" | Alcatel Shine Lite IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Gretel A9 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -36% | -47% | -7% | -31% | -34% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 473 | 462  -2% | 435  -8% | 507  7% | 425  -10% | 380  -20% | 
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 466 | 437  -6% | 407  -13% | 474  2% | 406  -13% | 370  -21% | 
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 91  0% | 86  -5% | 85  -7% | 90  -1% | 90  -1% | 
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.35 | 0.58  -66% | 1.08  -209% | 0.53  -51% | 0.45  -29% | 0.39  -11% | 
| Contrast (:1) | 1351 | 797  -41% | 403  -70% | 957  -29% | 944  -30% | 974  -28% | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 7.5  -70% | 5.7  -30% | 4.7  -7% | 7.6  -73% | 8  -82% | 
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.5 | 12.8  -22% | 12.3  -17% | 7.2  31% | 15.6  -49% | 13.6  -30% | 
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 8.5  -81% | 5.9  -26% | 4.8  -2% | 6.6  -40% | 8.5  -81% | 
| Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.54 87% | 2.18 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.44 90% | 2.8 79% | 
| CCT | 7343 89% | 8914 73% | 8164 80% | 6441 101% | 7853 83% | 8337 78% | 
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
| In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8163 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Storage score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Computer Vision score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Oukitel U7 Plus | |
| Blackview A8 Max | |
| Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL | |
| Alcatel Shine Lite | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Gretel A9 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Blackview A9 Pro | |
| Gretel A9 | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Blackview A9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids  400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs  2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall  100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.07 / 0.25 Watt | 
| Idle |    1.06 / 2.31 / 2.43 Watt | 
| Load |   6.51 / 6.96 Watt | 
|         | |
| Key: 
							min:   ,
							med:  ,
							max:  Metrahit Energy | |
| Blackview A9 Pro 3000 mAh | Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh | Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | Alcatel Shine Lite 2460 mAh | Gretel A9 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | 22% | 14% | 37% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.06 | 0.86  19% | 0.74  30% | 0.74  30% | 0.6  43% | 0.77  27% | 
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.31 | 2.68  -16% | 1.97  15% | 2.04  12% | 1.49  35% | 1.99  14% | 
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.43 | 2.78  -14% | 2.09  14% | 2.22  9% | 1.66  32% | 2.2  9% | 
| Load Average * (Watt) | 6.51 | 5.33  18% | 4.89  25% | 5.57  14% | 3.75  42% | 4.99  23% | 
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 6.96 | 6.49  7% | 5.09  27% | 6.59  5% | 4.57  34% | 5.14  26% | 
* ... smaller is better
| Blackview A9 Pro 3000 mAh | Oukitel U7 Plus 2500 mAh | Blackview A8 Max 3000 mAh | Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL 4100 mAh | Alcatel Shine Lite 2460 mAh | Gretel A9 2300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -49% | -29% | 14% | -11% | -39% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 19.3 | 24.4  26% | ||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.9 | 6.1  -49% | 8.4  -29% | 13.6  14% | 10.8  -9% | 7.6  -36% | 
| Load (h) | 4.9 | 5  2% | 4.3  -12% | 2.9  -41% | ||
| H.264 (h) | 14.1 | 
Pros
Cons
Blackview A9 Pro是一台做工优秀,设计美观,搭配不错相机的设备。遗憾的是,当我们开始使用Whatsapp或上网浏览时,它就开始变得十分缓慢。启动应用所需的时间也比其他智能手机慢很多,不过如果你对性能的要求不高的话,它应该不会让你失望。
在另一方面,它的优势包括经典简洁的设计,10点触控屏幕和非常优秀的前置相机。
这台设备的弱点则在于较低的性能和一般的电池续航。
作为一台入门级设备,在这个价位上它应该很难被其他设备击败。
考虑到较低的售价,A9 Pro是一台非常优秀的入门级智能手机,它避免了其他大部分低端设备所犯的错误,也没有其他的重大失误。
我们可以向那些更重视智能手机的“手机”功能、并不需要特别优秀的相机的用户推荐这台设备。在另一方面,如果你需要使用很多在后台运行的程序或者玩复杂的游戏的话,那么这台设备可能并不适合你。另外请不要在意它名字中的”Pro”字眼,它可能代表的是“拖延(procrastination)”。
注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。
Blackview A9 Pro
 - 07/11/2017  v6 (old)
Florian Schaar



























