Notebookcheck

Blackview A9 Pro 智能手机简短评测

Florian Schaar (translated by Yuchen Wang), 07/22/2017
Android Chinese Tech Smartphone Touchscreen

小巧。时尚。迟缓。 中国生产商Blackview的标志是经典简洁的设计。站在Blackview的户外智能手机旁边,这台小巧的A9 Pro显得有些格格不入。这台智能手机的硬件配置与其他Blackview设备相去甚远。不过,A9依然有一些深藏不露的特技。

Blackview A9 Pro (A Series)
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, 10点触控, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 11 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 耳机接口, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速感应器,陀螺仪,近距感应器
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz 3G: WCDMA 900/2100MHz 4G: FDD-LTE 800/900/1800/2100/2600MHz , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 143.6 x 72.4
Battery
3000 mAh Lithium-Ion, removeable
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Webcam: 双相机
Primary Camera: 8 MPix 30万像素 + 800万像素 双相机
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix 前置相机
Additional features
Speakers: 单声道, Keyboard: 触控, Keyboard Light: yes, Keine Garantie oder Gewährleistung Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
170 g, Power Supply: 61 g
Price
90 Euro

 

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Blackview A9 Pro
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.9 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Alcatel Shine Lite
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Gretel A9
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.3 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
Blackview A8 Max
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
34.3 MBit/s ∼72% -28%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gretel A9
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
51.4 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 32 GB eMMC Flash
49.7 MBit/s ∼97% +6%
Blackview A8 Max
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
47.5 MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Blackview A9 Pro
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.9 MBit/s ∼91%
Alcatel Shine Lite
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.3 MBit/s ∼82% -10%
GPS test track Blackview A9 Pro
GPS test track Blackview A9 Pro
GPS test track Blackview A9 Pro
GPS test track Blackview A9 Pro
GPS test track Blackview A9 Pro
GPS test track Blackview A9 Pro
GPS test track Garmin Edge 500
GPS test track Garmin Edge 500
GPS test track Garmin Edge 500
GPS test track Garmin Edge 500
GPS test track Garmin Edge 500
GPS test track Garmin Edge 500
front-facing camera
rear-facing camera
front-facing camera
rear-facing camera
rear-facing camera
... or ...
... A9 Pro?

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
442
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
458
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 484 cd/m² Average: 466.1 cd/m² Minimum: 20.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: 1351:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | - Ø
Gamma: 2.33
Blackview A9 Pro
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Oukitel U7 Plus
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Blackview A8 Max
IPS, 1280x720, 5.5
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
IPS, 1280x720, 5.2
Alcatel Shine Lite
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gretel A9
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-44%
-59%
-16%
-31%
-37%
Brightness
466
437
-6%
407
-13%
474
2%
406
-13%
370
-21%
Brightness Distribution
91
91
0%
86
-5%
85
-7%
90
-1%
90
-1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.58
-66%
1.08
-209%
0.53
-51%
0.45
-29%
0.39
-11%
Contrast
1351
797
-41%
403
-70%
957
-29%
944
-30%
974
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.4
7.5
-70%
5.7
-30%
4.7
-7%
7.6
-73%
8
-82%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.7
8.5
-81%
5.9
-26%
4.8
-2%
6.6
-40%
8.5
-81%
Gamma
2.33 103%
2.54 94%
2.18 110%
2.25 107%
2.44 98%
2.8 86%
CCT
7343 89%
8914 73%
8164 80%
6441 101%
7853 83%
8337 78%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8568 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.5 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
28488 Points ∼12%
Oukitel U7 Plus
28683 Points ∼13% +1%
Blackview A8 Max
30916 Points ∼14% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
30365 Points ∼13% +7%
Alcatel Shine Lite
28724 Points ∼13% +1%
Gretel A9
29237 Points ∼13% +3%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
747 Points ∼24%
Oukitel U7 Plus
705 Points ∼23% -6%
Blackview A8 Max
728 Points ∼24% -3%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
699 Points ∼23% -6%
Alcatel Shine Lite
795 Points ∼26% +6%
Gretel A9
763 Points ∼25% +2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
79 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U7 Plus
82 Points ∼2% +4%
Blackview A8 Max
82 Points ∼2% +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
83 Points ∼2% +5%
Alcatel Shine Lite
81 Points ∼2% +3%
Gretel A9
82 Points ∼2% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
99 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U7 Plus
102 Points ∼3% +3%
Blackview A8 Max
102 Points ∼3% +3%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
103 Points ∼3% +4%
Alcatel Shine Lite
101 Points ∼3% +2%
Gretel A9
102 Points ∼3% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
750 Points ∼24%
Oukitel U7 Plus
749 Points ∼24% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
727 Points ∼24% -3%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
741 Points ∼24% -1%
Alcatel Shine Lite
781 Points ∼25% +4%
Gretel A9
759 Points ∼25% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
134 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
126 Points ∼2% -6%
Blackview A8 Max
129 Points ∼2% -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
128 Points ∼2% -4%
Alcatel Shine Lite
126 Points ∼2% -6%
Gretel A9
124 Points ∼2% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
164 Points ∼3%
Oukitel U7 Plus
155 Points ∼3% -5%
Blackview A8 Max
158 Points ∼3% -4%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
157 Points ∼3% -4%
Alcatel Shine Lite
155 Points ∼3% -5%
Gretel A9
152 Points ∼3% -7%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
8528 Points ∼12%
Oukitel U7 Plus
8660 Points ∼12% +2%
Blackview A8 Max
8646 Points ∼12% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
7298 Points ∼10% -14%
Alcatel Shine Lite
8547 Points ∼12% 0%
Gretel A9
8339 Points ∼12% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
3199 Points ∼1%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3137 Points ∼1% -2%
Blackview A8 Max
3284 Points ∼1% +3%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3369 Points ∼1% +5%
Alcatel Shine Lite
3116 Points ∼1% -3%
Gretel A9
3235 Points ∼1% +1%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
3715 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3656 Points ∼2% -2%
Blackview A8 Max
3809 Points ∼2% +3%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3827 Points ∼2% +3%
Alcatel Shine Lite
3628 Points ∼2% -2%
Gretel A9
3744 Points ∼2% +1%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
6 fps ∼0%
Oukitel U7 Plus
5.9 fps ∼0% -2%
Blackview A8 Max
6 fps ∼0% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
5.9 fps ∼0% -2%
Alcatel Shine Lite
5.9 fps ∼0% -2%
Gretel A9
6 fps ∼0% 0%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
9.9 fps ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
9.8 fps ∼2% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
10 fps ∼2% +1%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
10 fps ∼2% +1%
Alcatel Shine Lite
9.8 fps ∼2% -1%
Gretel A9
10 fps ∼2% +1%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
2.2 fps ∼0%
Oukitel U7 Plus
4.4 fps ∼1% +100%
Blackview A8 Max
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
Alcatel Shine Lite
2.1 fps ∼0% -5%
Gretel A9
2.2 fps ∼0% 0%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
4.5 fps ∼1%
Oukitel U7 Plus
2.1 fps ∼1% -53%
Blackview A8 Max
4.5 fps ∼1% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4.7 fps ∼1% +4%
Alcatel Shine Lite
4 fps ∼1% -11%
Gretel A9
4.5 fps ∼1% 0%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
1.4 fps ∼0%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Alcatel Shine Lite
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
Gretel A9
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
3.2 fps ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
Blackview A8 Max
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
3.4 fps ∼2% +6%
Alcatel Shine Lite
2.9 fps ∼2% -9%
Gretel A9
3.2 fps ∼2% 0%
PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
1499 Points ∼25%
Blackview A8 Max
1433 Points ∼24% -4%
Storage score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
1531 Points ∼10%
Blackview A8 Max
2013 Points ∼13% +31%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
2608 Points ∼25%
Blackview A8 Max
2474 Points ∼24% -5%
Gretel A9
2436 Points ∼24% -7%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
3300 Points ∼39%
Oukitel U7 Plus
3105 Points ∼36% -6%
Blackview A8 Max
3427 Points ∼40% +4%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2517 Points ∼29% -24%
Alcatel Shine Lite
2415 Points ∼28% -27%
Gretel A9
3293 Points ∼39% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
553 Points ∼33%
Oukitel U7 Plus
573 Points ∼34% +4%
Blackview A8 Max
9 Points ∼1% -98%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
703 Points ∼41% +27%
Alcatel Shine Lite
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Gretel A9
10 Points ∼1% -98%
Graphics (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
213 Points ∼2%
Oukitel U7 Plus
211 Points ∼2% -1%
Blackview A8 Max
211 Points ∼2% -1%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
210 Points ∼2% -1%
Alcatel Shine Lite
206 Points ∼2% -3%
Gretel A9
209 Points ∼2% -2%
Memory (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
685 Points ∼15%
Oukitel U7 Plus
770 Points ∼17% +12%
Blackview A8 Max
733 Points ∼17% +7%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
780 Points ∼18% +14%
Alcatel Shine Lite
479 Points ∼11% -30%
Gretel A9
468 Points ∼11% -32%
System (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
1101 Points ∼11%
Oukitel U7 Plus
1120 Points ∼11% +2%
Blackview A8 Max
1125 Points ∼11% +2%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
1041 Points ∼10% -5%
Alcatel Shine Lite
1057 Points ∼10% -4%
Gretel A9
1030 Points ∼10% -6%
Overall (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
546 Points ∼14%
Oukitel U7 Plus
568 Points ∼15% +4%
Blackview A8 Max
201 Points ∼5% -63%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
588 Points ∼16% +8%
Alcatel Shine Lite
178 Points ∼5% -67%
Gretel A9
176 Points ∼5% -68%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
2311 Points ∼5%
Oukitel U7 Plus
2554 Points ∼5% +11%
Blackview A8 Max
2607 Points ∼5% +13%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
2534 Points ∼5% +10%
Alcatel Shine Lite
2430 Points ∼5% +5%
Gretel A9
2392 Points ∼5% +4%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
15.167 Points ∼0%
Oukitel U7 Plus
17.257 Points ∼0% +14%
Blackview A8 Max
17.188 Points ∼0% +13%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
16.471 Points ∼0% +9%
Alcatel Shine Lite
15.6 Points ∼0% +3%
Gretel A9
16.2 Points ∼0% +7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
18355.2 ms * ∼31%
Oukitel U7 Plus
14931.4 ms * ∼25% +19%
Blackview A8 Max
13642.6 ms * ∼23% +26%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
14983 ms * ∼25% +18%
Alcatel Shine Lite
15622 ms * ∼26% +15%
Gretel A9
15146 ms * ∼25% +17%
AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
16.47 MB/s ∼19%
Oukitel U7 Plus
22.6 MB/s ∼26% +37%
Blackview A8 Max
18.5 MB/s ∼21% +12%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
29.59 MB/s ∼34% +80%
Alcatel Shine Lite
15.01 MB/s ∼17% -9%
Gretel A9
14.81 MB/s ∼17% -10%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
33.07 MB/s ∼34%
Oukitel U7 Plus
46.63 MB/s ∼48% +41%
Blackview A8 Max
35.94 MB/s ∼37% +9%
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
47.67 MB/s ∼49% +44%
Alcatel Shine Lite
24.14 MB/s ∼25% -27%
Gretel A9
23.83 MB/s ∼25% -28%
Geekbench 4.1/4.2
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
1065 Points ∼12%
Gretel A9
938 Points ∼11% -12%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
1486 Points ∼6%
Gretel A9
1468 Points ∼6% -1%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Blackview A9 Pro
562 Points ∼9%
Gretel A9
537 Points ∼9% -4%

Legend

 
Blackview A9 Pro Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Oukitel U7 Plus Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview A8 Max Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Alcatel Shine Lite Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gretel A9 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 42.4 °C39.9 °C35.5 °C 
 44.6 °C41.7 °C37.2 °C 
 44.3 °C42.4 °C36.4 °C 
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 40.5 °C
33.1 °C37.3 °C41.3 °C
34.9 °C37.4 °C44.1 °C
34.2 °C35.7 °C41.5 °C
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 37.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.632.32525.432.33125.3394032.932.35033.637.56331.646.38028.440.91002738.912520.829.11602228.720021.325.625020.828.531521.240.540019.448.550019.554.363017.758.980017.966.9100017.869.6125017.368.6160017.471200016.772.1250017.274315018.277.3400017.980.9500017.672.9630017.760.3800017.859.21000017.957.81250018.158.41600018.256.2SPL3084.4N1.353.6median 17.9Blackview A9 Promedian 58.9Delta1.31531.641.525.435.725.336.532.936.433.636.831.637.128.428272820.826.9222321.324.320.830.421.236.519.445.419.551.917.75517.959.717.863.517.364.217.466.816.766.717.263.718.268.617.975.117.676.617.767.417.865.817.965.718.157.218.245.53081.61.343.6median 17.9Oukitel U7 Plusmedian 59.71.313.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Blackview A9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Oukitel U7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.59 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.25 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.06 / 2.31 / 2.43 Watt
Load midlight 6.51 / 6.96 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Blackview A9 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Blackview A8 Max
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Alcatel Shine Lite
2460 mAh
Gretel A9
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
3%
22%
14%
37%
20%
Idle Minimum *
1.06
0.86
19%
0.74
30%
0.74
30%
0.6
43%
0.77
27%
Idle Average *
2.31
2.68
-16%
1.97
15%
2.04
12%
1.49
35%
1.99
14%
Idle Maximum *
2.43
2.78
-14%
2.09
14%
2.22
9%
1.66
32%
2.2
9%
Load Average *
6.51
5.33
18%
4.89
25%
5.57
14%
3.75
42%
4.99
23%
Load Maximum *
6.96
6.49
7%
5.09
27%
6.59
5%
4.57
34%
5.14
26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 17min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
11h 51min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 53min
Blackview A9 Pro
3000 mAh
Oukitel U7 Plus
2500 mAh
Blackview A8 Max
3000 mAh
Asus Zenfone 3 Max ZC520TL
4100 mAh
Alcatel Shine Lite
2460 mAh
Gretel A9
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-49%
-29%
14%
-11%
-39%
Reader / Idle
1157
1462
26%
WiFi v1.3
711
366
-49%
506
-29%
814
14%
645
-9%
458
-36%
Load
293
301
3%
255
-13%
174
-41%
H.264
845

Pros

+ 支持景深控制的双相机
+ 经典时尚的设计
+ 双SIM卡和MicroSD支持
+ 可更换电池
+ 指纹感应器
+ LTE
+ 明亮的屏幕
+ 安卓7系统
+ 出色的性价比

Cons

- 迟缓的处理器
- 迟缓的闪存
- 重量高
- 一般的电池续航
In review: Blackview A9 Pro, courtesy of Blackview.
In review: Blackview A9 Pro, courtesy of Blackview.

Blackview A9 Pro是一台做工优秀,设计美观,搭配不错相机的设备。遗憾的是,当我们开始使用Whatsapp或上网浏览时,它就开始变得十分缓慢。启动应用所需的时间也比其他智能手机慢很多,不过如果你对性能的要求不高的话,它应该不会让你失望。

在另一方面,它的优势包括经典简洁的设计,10点触控屏幕和非常优秀的前置相机。

这台设备的弱点则在于较低的性能和一般的电池续航。

作为一台入门级设备,在这个价位上它应该很难被其他设备击败。

考虑到较低的售价,A9 Pro是一台非常优秀的入门级智能手机,它避免了其他大部分低端设备所犯的错误,也没有其他的重大失误。

我们可以向那些更重视智能手机的“手机”功能、并不需要特别优秀的相机的用户推荐这台设备。在另一方面,如果你需要使用很多在后台运行的程序或者玩复杂的游戏的话,那么这台设备可能并不适合你。另外请不要在意它名字中的”Pro”字眼,它可能代表的是“拖延(procrastination)”。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里。 

Blackview A9 Pro - 07/11/2017 v6
Florian Schaar

Chassis
81%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
40 / 60 → 67%
Weight
91%
Battery
95%
Display
83%
Games Performance
6 / 63 → 10%
Application Performance
29 / 70 → 41%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
55 / 91 → 60%
Camera
57%
Average
67%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Blackview A9 Pro 智能手机简短评测
Florian Schaar, 2017-07-22 (Update: 2017-07-22)