华硕 ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E 笔记本电脑简短评测
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E (ASUSPRO Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 520, Core: 1000 MHz, RAM: 800 MHz, 20.19.15.4326
Memory
8 GB
, 4 GB 板载 + 1 x 4 GB (插槽) 1/1 已占用, DDR4, 2133 MHz Hyundai Electronics, 最大支持20 GB
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, INNOLUX N140HGE-EAA, 262K (6-bit), CIE1931 45%, TN WLED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Hynix HFS256G39MND, 256 GB
, M.2 2280, 153 GB free
Weight
1.603 kg, Power Supply: 312 g
Price
0 990
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
INNOLUX N140HGE-EAA, 262K (6-bit), CIE1931 45% tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 222 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 206.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 213 cd/m²
Contrast: 525:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 8.75 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 9.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
57.96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.46% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
39.25% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
CCT: 11118 K
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E TN WLED, 1920x1080 | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G TN-Panel, 1600x900 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 TN, 1366x768 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD TN LED, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 20% | 8% | 3% | 25% | 6% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 39.25 | 46.98 20% | 42.2 8% | 40.06 2% | 48.93 25% | 41.65 6% | 42.09 7% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.1 | 69.8 20% | 62.3 7% | 60.3 4% | 73.7 27% | 61.6 6% | 62 7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.63 | 48.67 20% | 43.72 8% | 41.42 2% | 50.5 24% | 43.14 6% | 43.6 7% |
| Response Times | -23% | -36% | -10% | -19% | -9% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 42 ? | 44.4 ? -6% | 56.8 ? -35% | 43 ? -2% | 42 ? -0% | 42.4 ? -1% | |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 21.2 ? | 29.6 ? -40% | 28.8 ? -36% | 25 ? -18% | 29.2 ? -38% | 24.8 ? -17% | |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 204 ? | ||||||
| Screen | -2% | 19% | -16% | 10% | 20% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 210 | 216 3% | 245 17% | 229 9% | 366 74% | 226 8% | 230 10% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 207 | 209 1% | 225 9% | 207 0% | 336 62% | 211 2% | 216 4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 89 2% | 83 -5% | 80 -8% | 87 0% | 89 2% | 85 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.4 | 0.436 -9% | 0.24 40% | 0.69 -73% | 0.65 -63% | 0.22 45% | 0.26 35% |
| Contrast (:1) | 525 | 495 -6% | 1021 94% | 332 -37% | 563 7% | 1027 96% | 885 69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.75 | 9.63 -10% | 6.89 21% | 10.16 -16% | 10.26 -17% | 6.44 26% | 7.32 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.87 | 17.62 -27% | 17.18 -24% | 17.18 -24% | 18.14 -31% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.2 | 10.72 -17% | 6.45 30% | 10.87 -18% | 11.51 -25% | 5.87 36% | 6.98 24% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.49 88% | 2.46 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.4 92% | 2.37 93% | 2.5 88% |
| CCT | 11118 58% | 12873 50% | 6857 95% | 12881 50% | 12725 51% | 6856 95% | 6683 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 37.46 | 44.8 20% | 40.1 7% | 38.4 3% | 47 25% | 39.58 6% | 39.97 7% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 57.96 | 61.8 7% | 60.4 4% | 74 28% | 61.15 6% | 61.55 6% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
4% | 1% /
11% | -16% /
-15% | 8% /
11% | 2% /
12% | 4% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8160 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 7 Score | 4889 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3309 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3867 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4192 points | |
Help | ||
Hynix HFS256G39MND
Sequential Read:
445.4 MB/s
Sequential Write:
290.2 MB/s
512K Read:
327.9 MB/s
512K Write:
292 MB/s
4K Read:
22.64 MB/s
4K Write:
85 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
322.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
254.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x (sort by value) | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 | |
| 3DMark 03 Standard | 18240 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 8656 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1425 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 48117 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4958 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 707 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 331 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44.04 | 23.58 | 19.79 | 5.82 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 40.9 | 24.1 | 18.7 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17.8 | 11.9 | 7.2 |
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 28.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.7 / 36.1 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G Intel Core i7-4650U, HD Graphics 5000 | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Intel Core i7-6500U, Radeon R5 M330 | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 Intel Core i5-6300U, HD Graphics 520 | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD Intel Core i7-6500U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE Intel Core i5-6200U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -0% | 0% | -9% | 0% | -1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 28.8 | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 31.2 -8% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28.8 | 29.3 -2% | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 31.2 -8% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 28.8 | 29.3 -2% | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 32.1 -11% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 28.8 | 30.9 -7% | 29.2 -1% | 29.2 -1% | 33.1 -15% | 29.1 -1% | 29 -1% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 34.7 | 33.1 5% | 32.5 6% | 32.1 7% | 36.2 -4% | 32.3 7% | 34.2 1% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 36.1 | 37.3 -3% | 37.2 -3% | 36.8 -2% | 37.8 -5% | 36.6 -1% | 37.8 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Hynix HFS256G39MND | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G HD Graphics 5000, 4650U, Liteonit LCS-256M6S | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 Radeon R5 M330, 6500U, Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Liteon L8H-256V2G | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Toshiba HG6 THNSFJ256GCSU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -4% | 15% | 6% | 6% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.2 | 4.1 2% | 3.1 26% | 3.5 17% | 3.8 10% | 3.7 12% | 3.5 17% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.5 | 7.1 -9% | 6.3 3% | 5.3 18% | 6.3 3% | 6.8 -5% | 6.7 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.2 | 7.3 -1% | 7.9 -10% | 6 17% | 6.8 6% | 7.3 -1% | 7.3 -1% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 29.2 | 28.9 1% | 29.5 -1% | 26.3 10% | 34.4 -18% | 26.3 10% | 28.2 3% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 41 | 29.3 29% | 57.3 -40% | 36.6 11% | 28.3 31% | 34.6 16% | 34.6 16% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.35 / 0.65 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 6.5 / 7.2 Watt |
| Load |
29.2 / 41 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E 48 Wh | Asus ASUSPRO Advanced BU401LA-CZ020G 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L460-20FVS01400 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 E5470 62 Wh | HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD 46 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE 49 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460-20FN003LGE 46 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -8% | 22% | 76% | 28% | 23% | 14% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 11.9 | 11.7 -2% | 19.2 61% | 21.7 82% | 17 43% | 15.3 29% | 15.9 34% |
| H.264 (h) | 5.6 | 4.9 -12% | 7.2 29% | 10.8 93% | 8.9 59% | 8.5 52% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.7 | 7.1 25% | 11.1 95% | 7.6 33% | 6.6 16% | 5.6 -2% | |
| Load (h) | 2.2 | 2 -9% | 1.6 -27% | 2.9 32% | 2.4 9% | 1.9 -14% | 1.6 -27% |
| WiFi (h) | 5.2 |
Pros
+ 优秀的系统性能
+ 低重量
+ 优秀的输入设备
+ 支持指点杆
+ 丰富的安全功能
+ 运行很安静
+ 固态硬盘
+ 维护底盖
+ 24个月质保
+ 实惠的售价
Cons
- 一般的屏幕（低亮度，色域覆盖小）
- 一般的扬声器品质
- 较差的摄像头
- 无HDMI接口
- 固态硬盘分区不实用
AsusPro Advanced B8430UA是一台优秀持久的14寸商务笔记本电脑。得力于最新组件，它的性能相比前代机型有了明显的提升。较低的重量带来了出色的便携性，而不足1000欧元（约7269人民币）的售价也让人垂涎三尺。优秀的系统性能对于日常使用至关重要，因此搭配固态硬盘是个很明智的选择，它对于使用体验的贡献至关重要。
低调而坚固的机身搭配平衡的配置——这一切只需要不足1000欧元（约7269人民币）的预算。
我们对它的屏幕有些失望，尽管这块TN技术面板提供了不错的可视角度范围，但在亮度上很难让人满意。而较小的立体声扬声器也很难让人满意。这台测试机的显卡性能很难满足最新3D游戏的需要，不过对于办公则绰绰有余。如果你不想放弃游戏，那么就需要考虑一台搭配独立显卡的笔记本电脑。我们很喜欢它的输入设备，这对于办公设备来说不可或缺，同时它也带来了不错的电池续航。这台AsusPro Advanced可以说是AsusPro Advanced BU401LA实至名归的后续机型。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Asus ASUSPRO Advanced B8430UA-FA0084E
- 07/03/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Office - Weighted Average
Price comparison
