Notebookcheck

惠普暗影精灵4Pro笔记本电脑评测：RTX 2070 Max-Q与144hz的电竞体验

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Zewei Shen), 08/10/2019
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

RTX 2070 Max-Q与六核，144hz的电竞体验。 暗影精灵4Pro可能看起来像它的前身，但惠普已经彻底改变了它的内部设计。虽然单通道RAM可能会略微降低性能，但六核CPU和顶级GPU应该比我们评测的上一台暗影精灵能更有效地利用这块144 Hz面板。 请继续阅读以了解Core i7-8750H和RTX 2070 Max-Q带来的效果。

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Omen 15-dc Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 10DE 1F50, Nvidia 422.02
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 单通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB 
, + 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1200 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 专用耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 360 x 263
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p网络摄像头
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.38 kg, Power Supply: 652 g
Price
12999元 ~ 2000 Euro
Links
HP homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng

Size Comparison

364.3 mm 273.4 mm 23.7 mm 2.7 kg361 mm 246 mm 24.4 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg363 mm 275 mm 21 mm 2.2 kg
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (11.7 - 206, n=264)
91.5 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Aorus 15 X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
79.3 MB/s ∼87% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
79.1 MB/s ∼86% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s ∼86%
Dell G5 15 5590
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
19.1 MB/s ∼21% -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.4 - 257, n=262)
109 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Aorus 15 X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
86.13 MB/s ∼79% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
86 MB/s ∼79% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s ∼78%
Dell G5 15 5590
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
32.2 MB/s ∼30% -62%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 (min: 597, max: 686) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
657 (min: 556, max: 690) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
652 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (min: 569, max: 693) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
645 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1490, n=286)
620 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
293 (min: 186, max: 315) MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
650 (min: 605, max: 668) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
642 (min: 581, max: 693) MBit/s ∼99% +7%
Aorus 15 X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
622 MBit/s ∼96% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
601 (min: 562, max: 639) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1420, n=286)
573 MBit/s ∼88% -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
387 MBit/s ∼60% -36%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165
144 (min: 113, max: 190) MBit/s ∼22% -76%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (597-686)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø601 (562-639)
292
cd/m²		302
cd/m²		316
cd/m²
283
cd/m²		316
cd/m²		317
cd/m²
266
cd/m²		266
cd/m²		295
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LGD05C0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 317 cd/m² Average: 294.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 752:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6		Aorus 15 X9
LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, , 1920x1080, 15.6		Alienware m15 P79F
Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, , 3840x2160, 15.6		Dell G5 15 5590
AU Optronics B156HAN, , 1920x1080, 15.6		HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-11%
80%
-197%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 (7, 7)
15.2 (8.4, 6.8)
-9%
2.6 (1.2, 1.4)
81%
45 (22, 23)
-221%
17 (9, 8)
-21%
Response Time Black / White *
11 (7, 4)
12.4 (7.6, 4.8)
-13%
2.3 (1, 1.3)
79%
30 (17, 13)
-173%
11 (7, 4)
-0%
PWM Frequency
60.24 (100)
Screen
3%
-15%
-76%
-9%
Brightness middle
316
305.1
-3%
452.1
43%
234
-26%
317
0%
Brightness
295
295
0%
452
53%
219
-26%
283
-4%
Brightness Distribution
84
78
-7%
90
7%
82
-2%
76
-10%
Black Level *
0.42
0.33
21%
0.17
60%
0.62
-48%
Contrast
752
925
23%
1376
83%
511
-32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.7
2.58
4%
6.34
-135%
8.6
-219%
2.83
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.65
4.32
24%
12.97
-130%
17.49
-210%
5.78
-2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.58
1.33
16%
4.06
-157%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.35
3.4
-45%
2.8
-19%
8.55
-264%
2
15%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.28 96%
2.21 100%
3.02 73%
2.28 96%
CCT
6904 94%
6374 102%
6114 106%
7802 83%
6493 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
60.7
1%
91
52%
37
-38%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
95.2
2%
100
8%
59
-37%
93
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-4% / 1%
33% / 4%
-137% / -95%
-10% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 13539 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200Tooltip
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø983 (970.71-1067.24)
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1144 (1121.11-1191.01)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (163 - 177, n=86)
172 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
169 Points ∼98% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼97% -3%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
165 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 215, n=540)
157 Points ∼91% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1192 Points ∼100% +10%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H
1191 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H
  (863 - 1251, n=93)
1107 Points ∼93% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1082 Points ∼91%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1067 Points ∼90% -1%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1022 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2022, n=543)
845 Points ∼71% -22%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1082 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.54 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8408 Points ∼100% +27%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7303 Points ∼87% +10%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
6998 Points ∼83% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6565 - 8163, n=7)
6939 Points ∼83% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
6631 Points ∼79%
Average of class Gaming
  (1764 - 11245, n=232)
6445 Points ∼77% -3%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
6252 Points ∼74% -6%
Productivity
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7532 Points ∼100% +3%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
7445 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (6783 - 7678, n=7)
7350 Points ∼98% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
7328 Points ∼97%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7299 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (4175 - 9077, n=233)
7197 Points ∼96% -2%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
6808 Points ∼90% -7%
Essentials
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
9859 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
9270 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (8517 - 9859, n=7)
9041 Points ∼92% -8%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
8943 Points ∼91% -9%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
8599 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (4892 - 11266, n=234)
8580 Points ∼87% -13%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
8308 Points ∼84% -16%
Score
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5870 Points ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5728 Points ∼98% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5279 - 5941, n=7)
5533 Points ∼94% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5485 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=236)
5261 Points ∼90% -6%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
5069 Points ∼86% -10%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points ∼100%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5828 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5818 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (4465 - 5857, n=7)
5489 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
5291 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6593, n=409)
5060 Points ∼86% -14%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4465 Points ∼76% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5130 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points ∼99%
Aorus 15 X9
GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4843 Points ∼94% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (3570 - 5115, n=7)
4406 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=426)
4272 Points ∼83% -16%
Dell G5 15 5590
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G
4165 Points ∼81% -18%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3570 Points ∼70% -30%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5077 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5857 points
Help
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ		Aorus 15 X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8		Alienware m15 P79F
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G		Dell G5 15 5590
KBG30ZMS128G		HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G		Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
53%
35%
-53%
-21%
73%
Write 4K
50.19
147.2
193%
148.4
196%
64.27
28%
87.51
74%
112 (50.2 - 177, n=23)
123%
Read 4K
35.32
63.65
80%
49.65
41%
29.3
-17%
16.08
-54%
202 (31.4 - 3738, n=23)
472%
Write Seq
990.6
1573
59%
1139
15%
131.1
-87%
614.2
-38%
1393 (991 - 1687, n=22)
41%
Read Seq
1526
2602
71%
2353
54%
775.8
-49%
1341
-12%
1580 (755 - 2134, n=22)
4%
Write 4K Q32T1
445.1
530.5
19%
484.7
9%
96.78
-78%
307.9
-31%
357 (205 - 568, n=23)
-20%
Read 4K Q32T1
526.2
597.6
14%
541.9
3%
198.6
-62%
358.4
-32%
392 (229 - 645, n=23)
-26%
Write Seq Q32T1
1647
1592
-3%
1139
-31%
127.8
-92%
525.2
-68%
1483 (1104 - 1712, n=23)
-10%
Read Seq Q32T1
3427
2981
-13%
3108
-9%
1044
-70%
3077
-10%
3302 (1529 - 3522, n=23)
-4%
AS SSD
-8%
-9%
-347%
-45%
-17%
Copy Game MB/s
1070.93
1013.1
106.32
980.13
769 (271 - 1298, n=17)
Copy Program MB/s
404.34
452.77
94.45
30.89
402 (181 - 764, n=17)
Copy ISO MB/s
1328.83
946.42
159.22
1632.25
1284 (697 - 1892, n=17)
Score Total
3163
2544
-20%
3168
0%
620
-80%
2091
-34%
2621 (1644 - 3230, n=23)
-17%
Score Write
1642
859
-48%
1147
-30%
174
-89%
668
-59%
1209 (514 - 1752, n=23)
-26%
Score Read
1027
1116
9%
1366
33%
318
-69%
994
-3%
950 (724 - 1152, n=23)
-7%
Access Time Write *
0.032
0.031
3%
0.04
-25%
0.255
-697%
0.063
-97%
0.042 (0.026 - 0.104, n=23)
-31%
Access Time Read *
0.059
0.049
17%
0.058
2%
1.519
-2475%
0.126
-114%
0.0717 (0.041 - 0.113, n=23)
-22%
4K-64 Write
1370.77
584
-57%
937.85
-32%
95.21
-93%
484.41
-65%
970 (274 - 1501, n=23)
-29%
4K-64 Read
724.88
868.5
20%
1140.11
57%
184.51
-75%
729.91
1%
702 (530 - 917, n=23)
-3%
4K Write
113.48
119.55
5%
102.62
-10%
67.75
-40%
99.28
-13%
106 (77.4 - 144, n=23)
-7%
4K Read
53.43
56.55
6%
31.76
-41%
29.6
-45%
21.24
-60%
45.6 (32.4 - 53.8, n=23)
-15%
Seq Write
1574.55
1553.41
-1%
1065.99
-32%
115.06
-93%
842.61
-46%
1325 (827 - 1646, n=23)
-16%
Seq Read
2484.55
1912.12
-23%
1937.43
-22%
1035.81
-58%
2432.33
-2%
2019 (864 - 2724, n=23)
-19%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
23% / 17%
13% / 9%
-200% / -223%
-33% / -35%
28% / 20%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Sequential Read: 1568 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1523 MB/s
512K Read: 523.8 MB/s
512K Write: 354.8 MB/s
4K Read: 38.39 MB/s
4K Write: 98.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 373.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 327.2 MB/s
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
26645 Points ∼100% +81%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
23819 Points ∼89% +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (14723 - 25259, n=21)
21637 Points ∼81% +47%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20196 Points ∼76% +37%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
19187 Points ∼72% +30%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14723 Points ∼55%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=642)
13790 Points ∼52% -6%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
7754 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
7105 Points ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (5948 - 7105, n=19)
6530 Points ∼84%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
5977 Points ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=178)
5831 Points ∼75%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
4708 Points ∼61%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
20227 Points ∼100% +75%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
18443 Points ∼91% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (11563 - 20201, n=22)
17020 Points ∼84% +47%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
15415 Points ∼76% +33%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
14724 Points ∼73% +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=567)
11619 Points ∼57% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
11563 Points ∼57%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 15 X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
116232 Points ∼100% +61%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
101453 Points ∼87% +41%
Dell G5 15 5590
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H
95292 Points ∼82% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (39014 - 125189, n=20)
91060 Points ∼78% +26%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
72026 Points ∼62%
Average of class Gaming
  (5761 - 184578, n=548)
68891 Points ∼59% -4%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H
39014 Points ∼34% -46%
3DMark 11 Performance
13166 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
31932 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
10797 points
Help
BioShock Infinite | Dota 2 Reborn | Anno 1800
BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
154.3 fps ∼100% +33%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
153.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (116 - 211, n=14)
150 fps ∼97% +30%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
139.4 fps ∼90% +20%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
136.9 fps ∼89% +18%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
115.81 fps ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=358)
99.7 fps ∼65% -14%
1366x768 High Preset
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
256 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (203 - 290, n=13)
246 fps ∼96% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
244.55 fps ∼96%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
243.7 fps ∼95% 0%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
241.9 fps ∼94% -1%
Aorus 15 X9
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
229.8 fps ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 409, n=294)
178 fps ∼70% -27%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (106 - 124, n=3)
116 fps ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
109.7 fps ∼95% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
105.8 (min: 93.9) fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 134, n=31)
93.1 fps ∼80% -12%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (111 - 133, n=3)
122 fps ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
111.7 fps ∼92% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
111.4 (min: 98.2) fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 141, n=28)
96.2 fps ∼79% -14%
Anno 1800
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
36.9 fps ∼100% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (28.5 - 40, n=5)
35.7 fps ∼97% +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.4 - 54.3, n=26)
34.5 fps ∼93% +21%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
28.45 fps ∼77%
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (58.6 - 70.6, n=4)
67 fps ∼100% +14%
Dell G5 15 5590
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
63.1 fps ∼94% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (7 - 92.2, n=24)
59.4 fps ∼89% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
58.55 fps ∼87%
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 308.73 264.27 244.55 115.81 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 126.5 117.4 111.4 105.8 fps
Anno 1800 (2019) 58.55 28.45 fps

Noise Level

Idle
32.8 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB(A)
Load
42.5 / 47.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.831.73332.834.82537.736.333.336.837.73138.837.938.936.138.84032.134.331.932.532.15030.834.629.532.830.86333.531.929.127.133.58027.828.52725.527.810027.227.727.526.527.212528.327.726.426.528.31602726.424.826.12720027.727.324.424.427.725029.126.723.722.529.131530.727.623.520.930.740031.427.622.421.131.450028.62621.419.728.66303026.922.319.73080033.73022.418.733.7100037.833.622.818.137.8125037.533.62217.937.516003934.620.917.739200039.532.819.817.339.525003831.819.917.938315034.328.319.217.734.3400032.727.219.51832.7500032.226.819.31832.2630030.825.319.11830.8800027.221.51918.127.21000024.920.118.91824.91250021.119.118.817.921.11600019.618.818.917.919.6SPL47.542.532.830.547.5N(Sone)5.33.61.71.35.3median 30.7median 27.3median 21.4median 18.1median 30.7Delta3.41.32.42.13.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Max. Load
 46.4 °C47.6 °C46.2 °C 
 39.7 °C45.8 °C43.1 °C 
 31.2 °C30 °C33 °C 
Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 40.3 °C
46 °C59.6 °C54 °C
41.7 °C49 °C36.8 °C
31.5 °C30.3 °C31.2 °C
Maximum: 59.6 °C
Average: 42.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48.3 °C | Room Temperature 24.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.6 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 42.3 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.832.833.82532.836.832.83137.736.137.74032.532.532.55031.132.831.16329.327.129.38030.225.530.210029.226.529.212527.626.527.616037.626.137.620045.524.445.525045.322.545.331553.320.953.340063.221.163.25006019.76063061.519.761.580063.318.763.3100061.518.161.5125059.617.959.6160064.917.764.9200062.817.362.825006017.96031506017.760400057.21857.2500057.91857.9630057.11857.1800062.518.162.51000067.41867.41250064.417.964.41600051.517.951.5SPL73.730.573.7N(Sone)311.331median 60median 18.1median 60Delta7.52.17.535.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen 15-dc1303ngApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 14.7 / 18.6 / 22.6 Watt
Load midlight 90 / 120 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Aorus 15 X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Alienware m15 P79F
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6		Dell G5 15 5590
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), KBG30ZMS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-60%
-4%
22%
-23%
-23%
-32%
Idle Minimum *
14.7
26
-77%
10.9
26%
3.5
76%
14
5%
15.9 (5 - 46, n=19)
-8%
19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=722)
-32%
Idle Average *
18.6
30.8
-66%
12.3
34%
6.9
63%
18.2
2%
21 (12 - 59, n=19)
-13%
24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=722)
-34%
Idle Maximum *
22.6
34.9
-54%
19
16%
8.5
62%
24
-6%
26.7 (16.3 - 65.5, n=19)
-18%
30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=722)
-34%
Load Average *
90
90.7
-1%
96
-7%
127
-41%
143
-59%
102 (83.4 - 181, n=19)
-13%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=713)
-16%
Load Maximum *
120
241.2
-101%
229.1
-91%
179
-49%
190
-58%
194 (120 - 243, n=19)
-62%
173 (21.9 - 590, n=712)
-44%
Witcher 3 ultra *
175
161.7
126

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 9min
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh		Aorus 15 X9
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 62 Wh		Alienware m15 P79F
8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh		Dell G5 15 5590
8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 60 Wh		HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 70.07 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-43%
57%
158%
54%
20%
Reader / Idle
301
105
-65%
890
196%
460
53%
349 (39 - 1174, n=681)
16%
WiFi v1.3
197
95
-52%
309
57%
463
135%
274
39%
259 (78 - 622, n=387)
31%
Load
69
61
-12%
168
143%
117
70%
78.9 (18 - 202, n=648)
14%

Pros

+ 性价比高
+ RAM和ROM可升级
+ 144 Hz面板
+ 没有PWM调光
+ 相对较低的功耗

Cons

- 屏幕对比度低
- 屏幕黑阶高
- 续航差
The HP Omen 15-dc1303ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of HP Germany.
The HP Omen 15-dc1303ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of HP Germany.

暗影精灵4Pro仍然是一款坚固的游戏笔记本电脑。它保留了其前代产品的优势，同时在机身下藏有性能更强的组件。正如我们所期待的那样，该笔记本在负载下也相对安静地运行。升级或修理相对简单，可以更换RAM，存储以及无线网卡。然而，有些人可能会发现去拆底板有点困难。

暗影精灵4Pro物超所值，其强大的硬件充分利用了144 Hz 1080p显示屏。对比度差的屏幕和续航时间的不足则让这款游戏笔记本电脑光芒大减。

暗影精灵4Pro的续航时间出乎意料地差，特别是考虑到它配备了70 Wh电池。此外，虽然我们喜欢无PWM的144 Hz面板，但它的低对比度和高黑值令人失望。

总的来说，暗影精灵4Pro是一款普通的游戏笔记本电脑，专为那些只打算插电使用或连接到外接显示器的用户而设计。 RTX 2070 Max-Q和六核CPU仍然物有所值。

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng - 06/24/2019 v6(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
69 / 81 → 85%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 90%
Battery
71%
Display
89%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
84 / 95 → 88%
Noise
78 / 90 → 86%
Audio
74%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Average
77%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普暗影精灵4Pro笔记本电脑评测：RTX 2070 Max-Q与144hz的电竞体验
Mike Wobker, 2019-08-10 (Update: 2019-08-10)