惠普暗影精灵4Pro笔记本电脑评测：RTX 2070 Max-Q与144hz的电竞体验

Name: 惠普暗影精灵4Pro笔记本电脑评测：RTX 2070 Max-Q与144hz的电竞体验
Item: HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Rating: 86
Author: Mike Wobker

Mike Wobker, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Zewei Shen), 08/10/2019

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Windows

RTX 2070 Max-Q与六核，144hz的电竞体验。 暗影精灵4Pro可能看起来像它的前身，但惠普已经彻底改变了它的内部设计。虽然单通道RAM可能会略微降低性能，但六核CPU和顶级GPU应该比我们评测的上一台暗影精灵能更有效地利用这块144 Hz面板。请继续阅读以了解Core i7-8750H和RTX 2070 Max-Q带来的效果。

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Omen Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-8750H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 885 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 10DE 1F50, Nvidia 422.02

Memory

16384 MB

, DDR4-2666, 单通道

Display

15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, glossy: no

Mainboard

Intel HM370

Storage

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB

, + 1 TB HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1200 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 专用耳机和麦克风插孔, Card Reader: SD

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 25 x 360 x 263

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p网络摄像头

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.38 kg, Power Supply: 652 g

Price

12999元 ~ 2000 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Right-hand side: status LED, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, power supply connector

Left-hand side: USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, 3.5 mm headphone jack, 3.5 mm microphone jack, SD card reader

Rear: RJ45 LAN, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-A, HDMI, Mini DisplayPort, USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C 3.1, Kensington lock slot

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (11.7 - 202, n=249)	92.3 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Aorus 15 X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	79.3 MB/s ∼86% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	79.1 MB/s ∼86% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78.4 MB/s ∼85%
Dell G5 15 5590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	19.1 MB/s ∼21% -76%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (13.4 - 257, n=247)	110 MB/s ∼100% +29%
Aorus 15 X9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	86.13 MB/s ∼78% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s ∼78% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	85.3 MB/s ∼78%
Dell G5 15 5590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32.2 MB/s ∼29% -62%

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	666 (min: 597, max: 686) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	657 (min: 556, max: 690) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	652 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (min: 569, max: 693) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	645 MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (141 - 702, n=272)	605 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	293 (min: 186, max: 315) MBit/s ∼44% -56%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (min: 605, max: 668) MBit/s ∼100% +8%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	642 (min: 581, max: 693) MBit/s ∼99% +7%
Aorus 15 X9 Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	622 MBit/s ∼96% +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi	601 (min: 562, max: 639) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (144 - 749, n=272)	557 MBit/s ∼86% -7%
Alienware m15 P79F Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	387 MBit/s ∼60% -36%
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	144 (min: 113, max: 190) MBit/s ∼22% -76%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (597-686)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø601 (562-639)


292 cd/m²	302 cd/m²	316 cd/m²
283 cd/m²	316 cd/m²	317 cd/m²
266 cd/m²	266 cd/m²	295 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LGD05C0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 317 cd/m² Average: 294.8 cd/m² Minimum: 17 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 752:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 2.35 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.41

ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Aorus 15 X9 LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2, , 1920x1080, 15.6	Alienware m15 P79F Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, , 3840x2160, 15.6	Dell G5 15 5590 AU Optronics B156HAN, , 1920x1080, 15.6	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng LG Philips LGD05C0, , 1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times		-11%	80%	-197%	-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14 (7, 7)	15.2 (8.4, 6.8) -9%	2.6 (1.2, 1.4) 81%	45 (22, 23) -221%	17 (9, 8) -21%
Response Time Black / White *	11 (7, 4)	12.4 (7.6, 4.8) -13%	2.3 (1, 1.3) 79%	30 (17, 13) -173%	11 (7, 4) -0%
PWM Frequency			60.24 (100)
Screen		3%	-15%	-76%	-9%
Brightness middle	316	305.1 -3%	452.1 43%	234 -26%	317 0%
Brightness	295	295 0%	452 53%	219 -26%	283 -4%
Brightness Distribution	84	78 -7%	90 7%	82 -2%	76 -10%
Black Level *	0.42	0.33 21%		0.17 60%	0.62 -48%
Contrast	752	925 23%		1376 83%	511 -32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	2.7	2.58 4%	6.34 -135%	8.6 -219%	2.83 -5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.65	4.32 24%	12.97 -130%	17.49 -210%	5.78 -2%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.58	1.33 16%		4.06 -157%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.35	3.4 -45%	2.8 -19%	8.55 -264%	2 15%
Gamma	2.41 ^91%	2.28 ^96%	2.21 ^100%	3.02 ^73%	2.28 ^96%
CCT	6904 ^94%	6374 ^102%	6114 ^106%	7802 ^83%	6493 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60.7 1%	91 52%	37 -38%	60 0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	95.2 2%	100 8%	59 -37%	93 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / 1%	33% / 4%	-137% / -95%	-10% / -9%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9354 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø983 (970.71-1067.24)

Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)

Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1144 (1121.11-1191.01)

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=85)	172 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	171 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	169 Points ∼98% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H	168 Points ∼98% -2%
Aorus 15 X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points ∼97% -3%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	165 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (77 - 212, n=520)	157 Points ∼91% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H	1192 Points ∼100% +10%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H	1191 Points ∼100% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=92)	1109 Points ∼93% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H	1082 Points ∼91%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	1067 Points ∼90% -1%
Aorus 15 X9 Intel Core i7-8750H	1022 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Gaming (196 - 2022, n=523)	830 Points ∼70% -23%

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

171 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1082 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

119.54 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	8408 Points ∼100% +27%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7303 Points ∼87% +10%
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	6998 Points ∼83% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (6565 - 8163, n=7)	6939 Points ∼83% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	6631 Points ∼79%
Average of class Gaming (1764 - 11191, n=213)	6358 Points ∼76% -4%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	6252 Points ∼74% -6%
Productivity
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7532 Points ∼100% +3%
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7445 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (6783 - 7678, n=7)	7350 Points ∼98% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7328 Points ∼97%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	7299 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Gaming (4175 - 8968, n=214)	7179 Points ∼95% -2%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	6808 Points ∼90% -7%
Essentials
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	9859 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	9270 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (8517 - 9859, n=7)	9041 Points ∼92% -8%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	8943 Points ∼91% -9%
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	8599 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming (4892 - 10668, n=215)	8507 Points ∼86% -14%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	8308 Points ∼84% -16%
Score
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5870 Points ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5728 Points ∼98% +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5609 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5279 - 5941, n=7)	5533 Points ∼94% -1%
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5485 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming (2603 - 7171, n=216)	5222 Points ∼89% -7%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	5069 Points ∼86% -10%

PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5857 Points ∼100%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	5828 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5818 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (4465 - 5857, n=7)	5489 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	5291 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming (2484 - 6515, n=395)	5037 Points ∼86% -14%
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	4465 Points ∼76% -24%
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5130 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5077 Points ∼99%
Aorus 15 X9 GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	4843 Points ∼94% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (3570 - 5115, n=7)	4406 Points ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming (2554 - 6093, n=412)	4258 Points ∼83% -16%
Dell G5 15 5590 GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 8750H, KBG30ZMS128G	4165 Points ∼81% -18%
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	3570 Points ∼70% -30%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5077 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5857 points
Help

	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	Aorus 15 X9 Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8	Alienware m15 P79F Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	Dell G5 15 5590 KBG30ZMS128G	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		53%	35%	-53%	-21%	15%
Write 4K	50.19	147.2 193%	148.4 196%	64.27 28%	87.51 74%	110 (50.2 - 137, n=21) 119%
Read 4K	35.32	63.65 80%	49.65 41%	29.3 -17%	16.08 -54%	41 (31.4 - 63.7, n=21) 16%
Write Seq	990.6	1573 59%	1139 15%	131.1 -87%	614.2 -38%	1390 (991 - 1687, n=20) 40%
Read Seq	1526	2602 71%	2353 54%	775.8 -49%	1341 -12%	1570 (755 - 2134, n=20) 3%
Write 4K Q32T1	445.1	530.5 19%	484.7 9%	96.78 -78%	307.9 -31%	356 (205 - 568, n=21) -20%
Read 4K Q32T1	526.2	597.6 14%	541.9 3%	198.6 -62%	358.4 -32%	389 (229 - 645, n=21) -26%
Write Seq Q32T1	1647	1592 -3%	1139 -31%	127.8 -92%	525.2 -68%	1500 (1380 - 1712, n=21) -9%
Read Seq Q32T1	3427	2981 -13%	3108 -9%	1044 -70%	3077 -10%	3293 (1529 - 3522, n=21) -4%
AS SSD		-8%	-9%	-347%	-45%	-16%
Copy Game MB/s		1070.93	1013.1	106.32	980.13	817 (271 - 1298, n=15)
Copy Program MB/s		404.34	452.77	94.45	30.89	414 (181 - 764, n=15)
Copy ISO MB/s		1328.83	946.42	159.22	1632.25	1308 (697 - 1892, n=15)
Score Total	3163	2544 -20%	3168 0%	620 -80%	2091 -34%	2686 (1663 - 3230, n=21) -15%
Score Write	1642	859 -48%	1147 -30%	174 -89%	668 -59%	1259 (514 - 1752, n=21) -23%
Score Read	1027	1116 9%	1366 33%	318 -69%	994 -3%	958 (724 - 1152, n=21) -7%
Access Time Write *	0.032	0.031 3%	0.04 -25%	0.255 -697%	0.063 -97%	0.04 (0.026 - 0.104, n=21) -25%
Access Time Read *	0.059	0.049 17%	0.058 2%	1.519 -2475%	0.126 -114%	0.0716 (0.041 - 0.113, n=21) -21%
4K-64 Write	1370.77	584 -57%	937.85 -32%	95.21 -93%	484.41 -65%	1019 (274 - 1501, n=21) -26%
4K-64 Read	724.88	868.5 20%	1140.11 57%	184.51 -75%	729.91 1%	710 (530 - 917, n=21) -2%
4K Write	113.48	119.55 5%	102.62 -10%	67.75 -40%	99.28 -13%	104 (77.4 - 144, n=21) -8%
4K Read	53.43	56.55 6%	31.76 -41%	29.6 -45%	21.24 -60%	45.8 (32.4 - 53.8, n=21) -14%
Seq Write	1574.55	1553.41 -1%	1065.99 -32%	115.06 -93%	842.61 -46%	1357 (1017 - 1646, n=21) -14%
Seq Read	2484.55	1912.12 -23%	1937.43 -22%	1035.81 -58%	2432.33 -2%	2027 (864 - 2724, n=21) -18%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		23% / 17%	13% / 9%	-200% / -223%	-33% / -35%	-1% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ

Sequential Read: 1568 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1523 MB/s

512K Read: 523.8 MB/s

512K Write: 354.8 MB/s

4K Read: 38.39 MB/s

4K Write: 98.2 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 373.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 327.2 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	26645 Points ∼100% +81%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	23819 Points ∼89% +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (14723 - 25259, n=19)	21636 Points ∼81% +47%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	20196 Points ∼76% +37%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	19187 Points ∼72% +30%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14723 Points ∼55%
Average of class Gaming (513 - 50983, n=622)	13475 Points ∼51% -8%

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	7754 Points ∼100%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	7105 Points ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (5948 - 7105, n=17)	6539 Points ∼84%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	5977 Points ∼77%
Average of class Gaming (368 - 13013, n=159)	5716 Points ∼74%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	4708 Points ∼61%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	20227 Points ∼100% +75%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	18443 Points ∼91% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (11563 - 20201, n=20)	17021 Points ∼84% +47%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	15415 Points ∼76% +33%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14724 Points ∼73% +27%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	11563 Points ∼57%
Average of class Gaming (385 - 40636, n=547)	11401 Points ∼56% -1%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Aorus 15 X9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	116232 Points ∼100% +61%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	101453 Points ∼87% +41%
Dell G5 15 5590 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-8750H	95292 Points ∼82% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (39014 - 125189, n=18)	89007 Points ∼77% +24%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	72026 Points ∼62%
Average of class Gaming (5761 - 184578, n=528)	67660 Points ∼58% -6%
Alienware m15 P79F NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	39014 Points ∼34% -46%

3DMark 11 Performance		13166 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		31932 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		10797 points
Help

... in comparison

BioShock Infinite | Dota 2 Reborn | Anno 1800

BioShock Infinite
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Aorus 15 X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)	154.3 fps ∼100% +33%
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	153.7 fps ∼100% +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (116 - 211, n=14)	150 fps ∼97% +30%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	139.4 fps ∼90% +20%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)	136.9 fps ∼89% +18%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	115.81 fps ∼75%
Average of class Gaming (9.7 - 266, n=344)	97.7 fps ∼63% -16%
1366x768 High Preset
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	256 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (203 - 290, n=13)	246 fps ∼96% +1%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	244.55 fps ∼96%
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	243.7 fps ∼95% 0%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)	241.9 fps ∼94% -1%
Aorus 15 X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)	229.8 fps ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 348, n=281)	175 fps ∼68% -28%

Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (106 - 124, n=3)	116 fps ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	109.7 fps ∼95% +4%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	105.8 (min: 93.9) fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (14 - 125, n=27)	93 fps ∼80% -12%
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (111 - 133, n=3)	122 fps ∼100% +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	111.7 fps ∼92% 0%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	111.4 (min: 98.2) fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (15.3 - 133, n=24)	95.3 fps ∼78% -14%

Anno 1800
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality (DX11)
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)	36.9 fps ∼100% +30%
Average of class Gaming (17.4 - 54.3, n=20)	36.9 fps ∼100% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (28.5 - 40, n=5)	35.7 fps ∼97% +25%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	28.45 fps ∼77%
1920x1080 High Graphics Quality (DX11)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q (58.6 - 70.6, n=4)	67 fps ∼100% +14%
Dell G5 15 5590 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)	63.1 fps ∼94% +8%
Average of class Gaming (7 - 92.2, n=18)	62.9 fps ∼94% +7%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	58.55 fps ∼87%

	low	med.	high	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	308.73	264.27	244.55	115.81	fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	126.5	117.4	111.4	105.8	fps
Anno 1800 (2019)			58.55	28.45	fps

Noise Level

Idle		32.8 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB(A)
Load		42.5 / 47.5 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Max. Load

Idle


46.4 °C	47.6 °C	46.2 °C
39.7 °C	45.8 °C	43.1 °C
31.2 °C	30 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 40.3 °C


46 °C	59.6 °C	54 °C
41.7 °C	49 °C	36.8 °C
31.5 °C	30.3 °C	31.2 °C

Maximum: 59.6 °C
Average: 42.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 48.3 °C | Room Temperature 24.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.6 °C / 103 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59.6 °C / 139 F, compared to the average of 42.2 °C / 108 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.2 °C / 92 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.2 °C / -7.6 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (67.35 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.2 / 0.26 Watt
Idle	14.7 / 18.6 / 22.6 Watt
Load	90 / 120 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Aorus 15 X9 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Alienware m15 P79F 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6	Dell G5 15 5590 8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), KBG30ZMS128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-60%	-4%	22%	-23%	-26%	-32%
Idle Minimum *	14.7	26 -77%	10.9 26%	3.5 76%	14 5%	16.8 (7 - 46, n=17) -14%	19.4 (3.4 - 113, n=702) -32%
Idle Average *	18.6	30.8 -66%	12.3 34%	6.9 63%	18.2 2%	21.8 (12 - 59, n=17) -17%	24.9 (6.6 - 119, n=702) -34%
Idle Maximum *	22.6	34.9 -54%	19 16%	8.5 62%	24 -6%	27.3 (16.3 - 65.5, n=17) -21%	30.2 (8.3 - 122, n=702) -34%
Load Average *	90	90.7 -1%	96 -7%	127 -41%	143 -59%	102 (83.4 - 181, n=17) -13%	104 (14.1 - 319, n=693) -16%
Load Maximum *	120	241.2 -101%	229.1 -91%	179 -49%	190 -58%	196 (120 - 243, n=17) -63%	171 (21.9 - 590, n=692) -43%
Witcher 3 ultra *		175	161.7		126

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		5h 01min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3		3h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 9min

	HP Omen 15-dc1303ng 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh	Aorus 15 X9 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 62 Wh	Alienware m15 P79F 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh	Dell G5 15 5590 8750H, GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 60 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 70.07 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-43%	57%	158%	54%	20%
Reader / Idle	301	105 -65%		890 196%	460 53%	347 (39 - 1174, n=666) 15%
WiFi v1.3	197	95 -52%	309 57%	463 135%	274 39%	257 (78 - 622, n=366) 30%
Load	69	61 -12%		168 143%	117 70%	79 (18 - 202, n=632) 14%

Pros

+ 性价比高

+ RAM和ROM可升级

+ 144 Hz面板

+ 没有PWM调光

+ 相对较低的功耗

Cons

- 屏幕对比度低

- 屏幕黑阶高

- 续航差

The HP Omen 15-dc1303ng laptop review. Test device courtesy of HP Germany.

暗影精灵4Pro仍然是一款坚固的游戏笔记本电脑。它保留了其前代产品的优势，同时在机身下藏有性能更强的组件。正如我们所期待的那样，该笔记本在负载下也相对安静地运行。升级或修理相对简单，可以更换RAM，存储以及无线网卡。然而，有些人可能会发现去拆底板有点困难。

暗影精灵4Pro物超所值，其强大的硬件充分利用了144 Hz 1080p显示屏。对比度差的屏幕和续航时间的不足则让这款游戏笔记本电脑光芒大减。

暗影精灵4Pro的续航时间出乎意料地差，特别是考虑到它配备了70 Wh电池。此外，虽然我们喜欢无PWM的144 Hz面板，但它的低对比度和高黑值令人失望。

总的来说，暗影精灵4Pro是一款普通的游戏笔记本电脑，专为那些只打算插电使用或连接到外接显示器的用户而设计。 RTX 2070 Max-Q和六核CPU仍然物有所值。

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng - 2019-06-2406/24/2019 v6^(old)
Mike Wobker

Chassis

79 / 98 → 81%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

78%

Connectivity

69 / 81 → 85%

Weight

61 / 10-66 → 90%

Battery

71%

Display

89%

Games Performance

95%

Application Performance

95%

Temperature

84 / 95 → 88%

Noise

78 / 90 → 86%

Audio

74%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Average

77%

86%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Linked Articles

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng (Omen Series)

Review

•

惠普 Omen 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1070, ...

Review

•

惠普 Omen 15 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 M...

Review

•

惠普 Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX ...

Review

•

惠普 Omen 17 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 T...

Review

•

惠普 Omen 17 (GTX 1060) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Review

•

惠普 Omen 17 (i7-6700HQ, GTX 107...

Review

•

惠普 Omen 笔记本电脑简短评测

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Lenovo B50-30 (min) N2815, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	49
...
Apple MacBook Pro 15 2018 (2.9 GHz, Vega 20) 8950HK, Radeon Pro Vega 20	1051
MSI GE75 8SF 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)	1066
Acer Aspire 7 A715-72G-704Q 8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)	1077
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	1082
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator 8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	1100
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA 9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	1115
HP ZBook Studio x360 G5-4QH13EA 8750H, Quadro P1000	1118
...
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG (max) 9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)	2022

3DMark 11 in comparison
HP Stream 7 5700ng (min) Z3735G, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	183
...
MSI GE62VR 6RF-001US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	12762
Razer Blade 15 Base Model 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	12856
EVGA SC15 7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	13148
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng 8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q	13166
Asus GL704GM-DH74 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	13334
Lenovo Legion Y7000P-1060 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	13743
Lenovo Legion Y530-15ICH 8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)	13743
...
Alienware Area-51m i9-9900K RTX 2080 (max) 9900K, GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)	29759

惠普暗影精灵4Pro笔记本电脑评测：RTX 2070 Max-Q与144hz的电竞体验

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

HP Omen 15-dc1303ng audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

Linked Articles

Pricecompare