Notebookcheck

诺基亚 3 智能手机简短评测

Florian Wimmer (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 08/23/2017
Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

欢迎回来!诺基亚重新进入了智能手机生产领域,并添加了一个新的入门级设备——诺基亚 3。在我们的评测中,我们将揭露,该机到底是难负盛名还是达到了新高度。

Nokia 3
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-T720
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5 inch 16:9, 1280x720 pixel 294 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm combo audio jack, Card Reader: micro-SD max. 128 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0, GSM (850/​900/​1800/​1900), UMTS (850/​900/​1900/​2100), LTE (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40); bandwidth (download/​upload): 150Mbps/​50Mbps, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.68 x 143 x 71.4
Battery
10 Wh, 2630 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 7.0 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, contrast AF, LED flash, videos @720p/30FPS
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, contrast AF, videos @720p/30FPS
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker in the lower edge, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, headset, SIM tool, support, themes, 24 Months Warranty, FM radio, SAR rates: 0.94 W/kg (body), 0.76 W/kg (head), fanless
Weight
141 g, Power Supply: 57 g
Price
159 EUR (£130) Euro

 

Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3
Nokia 3

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490)
99.7 MBit/s ∼100% +23%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz)
81.1 MBit/s ∼81%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
79.9 MBit/s ∼80% -1%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
54.1 MBit/s ∼54% -33%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
33.5 MBit/s ∼34% -59%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash (AVM FritzBox 6490)
106 MBit/s ∼100% +38%
Sony Xperia E5
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6735, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5.0 GHz)
78.7 MBit/s ∼74% +3%
Nokia 3
Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 5 GHz)
76.6 MBit/s ∼72%
LG K8 2017
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
49.2 MBit/s ∼46% -36%
Gigaset GS160
Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash (Linksys EA8500, 2.4 GHz)
48.2 MBit/s ∼45% -37%
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Overview
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Woods
GPS Garmin Edge 500 - Woods
GPS Nokia 3 - Overview
GPS Nokia 3 - Overview
GPS Nokia 3 - Bridge
GPS Nokia 3 - Bridge
GPS Nokia 3 - Woods
GPS Nokia 3 - Woods

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
click to load images
506
cd/m²
466
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
481
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 506 cd/m² Average: 468.8 cd/m² Minimum: 16.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 481 cd/m²
Contrast: 2186:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 8.5 | - Ø
95.3% sRGB (Calman)
Gamma: 2.16
Nokia 3
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Gigaset GS160
IPS, 1280x720, 5
LG K8 2017
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Sony Xperia E5
IPS, 1280x720, 5
Screen
-13%
-33%
-28%
5%
Brightness
469
452
-4%
479
2%
351
-25%
534
14%
Brightness Distribution
84
84
0%
95
13%
93
11%
96
14%
Black Level *
0.22
0.42
-91%
0.55
-150%
0.49
-123%
0.33
-50%
Contrast
2186
1093
-50%
889
-59%
731
-67%
1630
-25%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
8.1
4.5
44%
8.3
-2%
7.1
12%
5.7
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
8.5
6.5
24%
8.7
-2%
6.5
24%
4.7
45%
Gamma
2.16 111%
2.22 108%
2.08 115%
2.12 113%
2.51 96%
CCT
9014 72%
7791 83%
9034 72%
8166 80%
7264 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).
AnTuTu Benchmark v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
27703 Points ∼12%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
22218 Points ∼10% -20%
Gigaset GS160
28459 Points ∼12% +3%
LG K8 2017
30924 Points ∼14% +12%
Sony Xperia E5
32477 Points ∼14% +17%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
2568 Points ∼38%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points ∼32% -14%
LG K8 2017
2986 Points ∼44% +16%
Sony Xperia E5
2785 Points ∼41% +8%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3439 Points ∼41%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2217 Points ∼27% -36%
Gigaset GS160
2563 Points ∼31% -25%
LG K8 2017
4673 Points ∼56% +36%
Sony Xperia E5
3817 Points ∼46% +11%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 3
575 Points ∼37%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
533 Points ∼35% -7%
Gigaset GS160
9 Points ∼1% -98%
LG K8 2017
616 Points ∼40% +7%
Sony Xperia E5
639 Points ∼41% +11%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
211 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
308 Points ∼4% +46%
Gigaset GS160
208 Points ∼2% -1%
LG K8 2017
436 Points ∼5% +107%
Sony Xperia E5
280 Points ∼3% +33%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 3
703 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points ∼12% -25%
Gigaset GS160
497 Points ∼11% -29%
LG K8 2017
634 Points ∼14% -10%
Sony Xperia E5
552 Points ∼12% -21%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1081 Points ∼16%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
887 Points ∼13% -18%
Gigaset GS160
1029 Points ∼16% -5%
LG K8 2017
1191 Points ∼18% +10%
Sony Xperia E5
1091 Points ∼17% +1%
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 3
551 Points ∼15%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
526 Points ∼14% -5%
Gigaset GS160
178 Points ∼5% -68%
LG K8 2017
371 Points ∼10% -33%
Sony Xperia E5
567 Points ∼15% +3%
Geekbench 4.1
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1045 Points ∼12%
LG K8 2017
1203 Points ∼14% +15%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1520 Points ∼8%
LG K8 2017
1737 Points ∼9% +14%
Sony Xperia E5
1527 Points ∼8% 0%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
556 Points ∼11%
LG K8 2017
642 Points ∼13% +15%
Sony Xperia E5
556 Points ∼11% 0%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
686 Points ∼23%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points ∼0% -100%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
835 Points ∼28% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
85 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points ∼0% -100%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
100 Points ∼2% +18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 3
106 Points ∼3%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
Points ∼0% -100%
LG K8 2017
Points ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
124 Points ∼3% +17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
745 Points ∼25%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
558 Points ∼19% -25%
LG K8 2017
622 Points ∼21% -17%
Sony Xperia E5
817 Points ∼27% +10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
124 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
42 Points ∼1% -66%
LG K8 2017
31 Points ∼0% -75%
Sony Xperia E5
175 Points ∼2% +41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 3
152 Points ∼3%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
53 Points ∼1% -65%
LG K8 2017
39 Points ∼1% -74%
Sony Xperia E5
212 Points ∼4% +39%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 3
7925 Points ∼11%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
7429 Points ∼10% -6%
Gigaset GS160
7881 Points ∼11% -1%
LG K8 2017
6656 Points ∼9% -16%
Sony Xperia E5
9349 Points ∼13% +18%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3177 Points ∼1%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3836 Points ∼1% +21%
Gigaset GS160
3291 Points ∼1% +4%
LG K8 2017
2546 Points ∼1% -20%
Sony Xperia E5
4615 Points ∼1% +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3665 Points ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
4298 Points ∼2% +17%
Gigaset GS160
3780 Points ∼2% +3%
LG K8 2017
2951 Points ∼1% -19%
Sony Xperia E5
5200 Points ∼3% +42%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 3
6 fps ∼0%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
5.2 fps ∼0% -13%
Gigaset GS160
6 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
3.4 fps ∼0% -43%
Sony Xperia E5
8.4 fps ∼1% +40%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Nokia 3
10 fps ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
9.4 fps ∼2% -6%
Gigaset GS160
11 fps ∼2% +10%
LG K8 2017
6.4 fps ∼1% -36%
Sony Xperia E5
15 fps ∼3% +50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 3
2.2 fps ∼0%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1.8 fps ∼0% -18%
Gigaset GS160
2.1 fps ∼0% -5%
LG K8 2017
1.3 fps ∼0% -41%
Sony Xperia E5
3 fps ∼1% +36%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 3
4.5 fps ∼1%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
3.8 fps ∼1% -16%
Gigaset GS160
4.7 fps ∼1% +4%
LG K8 2017
3.7 fps ∼1% -18%
Sony Xperia E5
6 fps ∼2% +33%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 3
1.4 fps ∼0%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
1.4 fps ∼0% 0%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
1.9 fps ∼0% +36%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 3
3.2 fps ∼2%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
fps ∼0% -100%
Gigaset GS160
3.4 fps ∼2% +6%
LG K8 2017
fps ∼0% -100%
Sony Xperia E5
3.4 fps ∼2% +6%

Legend

 
Nokia 3 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Gigaset GS160 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG K8 2017 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425, Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia E5 Mediatek MT6735, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Sony Xperia E5
17.885 Points ∼100% +28%
LG K8 2017
17.124 Points ∼96% +23%
Gigaset GS160
14.428 Points ∼81% +3%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
14.105 Points ∼79% +1%
Nokia 3
13.97 Points ∼78%
Octane V2 - Total Score
LG K8 2017
3052 Points ∼100% +35%
Sony Xperia E5
2910 Points ∼95% +28%
Gigaset GS160
2493 Points ∼82% +10%
Nokia 3
2269 Points ∼74%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
1938 Points ∼63% -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Nokia 3
16759 ms * ∼100%
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
15895 ms * ∼95% +5%
Gigaset GS160
13907.4 ms * ∼83% +17%
Sony Xperia E5
13232.4 ms * ∼79% +21%
LG K8 2017
10742 ms * ∼64% +36%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Nokia 3
49 Points ∼100%
Gigaset GS160
47 Points ∼96% -4%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 3Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KLGigaset GS160LG K8 2017Sony Xperia E5
AndroBench 3-5
-18%
-7%
78%
43%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.9
14.4
-77%
19.19
-69%
52.23
-17%
45.56
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
64.3
17.7
-72%
30.71
-52%
78.55
22%
65.03
1%
Random Write 4KB
5.5
6.9
25%
6.8
24%
12.5
127%
9.84
79%
Random Read 4KB
17.7
19.7
11%
18.5
5%
41.6
135%
26.04
47%
Sequential Write 256KB
34
42.4
25%
46.6
37%
84.6
149%
83.09
144%
Sequential Read 256KB
181
143
-21%
200.5
11%
270.8
50%
209.69
16%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 SettingsValue
 high13 fps
 very low28 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 SettingsValue
 high29 fps
Max. Load
 32 °C31.4 °C31.6 °C 
 32.5 °C31.7 °C32.5 °C 
 32.4 °C32 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 32.5 °C
Average: 32 °C
30 °C31.1 °C31.7 °C
29.9 °C31.6 °C33.3 °C
31 °C32 °C34.2 °C
Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 31.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.7 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.330.527.32527.730.827.73126.929.226.94034.233.534.25026.229.226.26323.527.823.58025.730.525.710025.429.525.412532.523.732.516022.723.822.720026.322.726.325032.122.232.131540.922.540.940049.722.149.750058.521.358.563065.119.365.18007019.770100070.71970.7125069.518.369.5160069.416.269.4200070.715.970.7250072.215.572.2315074.515.774.5400080.715.480.7500080.515.280.5630071.915.271.9800070.515.270.51000069.915.169.91250058.615.158.61600046.11546.1SPL86.529.686.5N60.21.360.2median 69.4Nokia 3median 18.3median 69.4Delta12.73.512.729.330.929.328.129.528.127.527.327.528.73128.727.527.327.526.42726.430.92530.927.223.727.232.930.232.929.623.829.636.32336.339.722.639.745.122.845.150.222.350.256.122.956.159.819.459.865.817.965.866.517.766.566.318.666.366.215.966.266.715.766.768.615.568.668.515.468.564.715.464.767.315.167.366.815.266.868.115.268.163.715.263.757.315.157.342.315.242.378.429.678.441.11.341.1median 63.7Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KLmedian 17.7median 63.711.73.811.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Nokia 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 84% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 26%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.11 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.35 / 1.39 Watt
Load midlight 3.1 / 4.02 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Power Consumption
-23%
-19%
-7%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.92
-37%
0.56
16%
0.65
3%
1.03
-54%
Idle Average *
1.35
1.76
-30%
1.7
-26%
1.6
-19%
2.06
-53%
Idle Maximum *
1.39
1.85
-33%
1.75
-26%
1.62
-17%
2.12
-53%
Load Average *
3.1
3.47
-12%
4.17
-35%
2.97
4%
5.01
-62%
Load Maximum *
4.02
4.22
-5%
5.07
-26%
4.34
-8%
5.04
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 58min
WiFi Surfing v1.3
9h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 43min
Nokia 3
2630 mAh
Asus Zenfone Go ZB500KL
2600 mAh
Gigaset GS160
2500 mAh
LG K8 2017
2500 mAh
Sony Xperia E5
2300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-1%
4%
4%
-24%
Reader / Idle
1258
1224
-3%
1326
5%
H.264
628
617
-2%
702
12%
WiFi v1.3
552
572
4%
615
11%
594
8%
422
-24%
Load
283
277
-2%
244
-14%
280
-1%

Pros

+ 金属挡板
+ 时尚外壳
+ 相对纯粹的Android
+ 比较多的LTE频段
+ 扬声器和耳机
+ 明亮的高对比度屏幕
+ 低温度
+ 低功耗

Cons

- 摄像头质量差
- 不准确的GPS
- 麦克风太敏感
- 与众不同的屏幕亮度
- 强烈的蓝色光
- 不可拆卸电池
In review: Nokia 3. Review sample courtesy of Cyberport.de
In review: Nokia 3. Review sample courtesy of Cyberport.de

诺基亚 3是一款几乎稳定的入门级设备,这可能足以在这个领域成功地启动市场。同时,该设备也在一些方面让我们感动惊讶,诸如:屏幕亮度,对比度,功耗以及许多可用的LTE频段。

这些都让它在这个类别下脱颖而出,然而,它也存在一些缺陷。考虑到该价位下,有款设备存在于市场中,它有更好的摄像头和性能—— Xperia E5。另外,扬声器音质和GPS的准确度也不佳,当然,这些功能在这个价位不能被期望过多。

明亮而高对比度屏幕,低功耗,时尚外观——诺基亚 3在入门级设备中有它的一席之地。然而,由于该机的拍摄功能的有限性,它在这方面的得分较低。

时尚外观和整体还算不错的测试结果,在入门级门类下,给了诺基亚3 一个不错的开始。现在,我们开始期待测试更大型号的诺基亚机器,毕竟诺基亚需要抓住中端用户的心。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Nokia 3 - 07/28/2017 v6
Florian Wimmer

Chassis
76%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
36 / 60 → 60%
Weight
93%
Battery
92%
Display
82%
Games Performance
6 / 63 → 10%
Application Performance
30 / 70 → 43%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
47 / 91 → 52%
Camera
54%
Average
66%
78%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 诺基亚 3 智能手机简短评测
Florian Wimmer, 2017-08-23 (Update: 2017-08-24)