Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarWileyfox Spark X 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 554 cd/m²
Contrast: 815:1 (Black: 0.68 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
Gamma: 2.24
| Wileyfox Spark X IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | LG X Power K220 IPS, 1280x720, 5.30 | Acer Liquid Zest Plus IPS, 1280x720, 5.50 | Lenovo Moto G4 Play IPS, 1280x720, 5.00 | Blackview R7 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -2% | -9% | 1% | -39% | |
| Brightness middle | 554 | 381 -31% | 414 -25% | 412 -26% | 552 0% |
| Brightness | 542 | 352 -35% | 420 -23% | 414 -24% | 526 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 96 | 85 -11% | 94 -2% | 94 -2% | 91 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.68 | 0.2 71% | 0.33 51% | 0.42 38% | 0.64 6% |
| Contrast | 815 | 1905 134% | 1255 54% | 981 20% | 863 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 7.3 -40% | 8.1 -56% | 5.6 -8% | 11 -112% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.7 | 21.2 -98% | 13.8 -29% | 9.7 9% | 20.8 -94% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 7.4 -9% | 9.6 -41% | 6.9 -1% | 14.3 -110% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.26 97% | 2 110% | 2.4 92% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 7118 91% | 8417 77% | 7754 84% | 8422 77% | 12996 50% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17942 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Wileyfox Spark X | |
| Blackview R7 | |
| Acer Liquid Zest Plus | |
| Lenovo Moto G4 Play | |
| LG X Power K220 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Wileyfox Spark X | Blackview R7 | Acer Liquid Zest Plus | Lenovo Moto G4 Play | LG X Power K220 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 42% | -7% | 55% | -3% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 194.8 | 247.6 27% | 178.6 -8% | 144.1 -26% | 196.8 1% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 37.91 | 122.7 224% | 39.51 4% | 43.95 16% | 43.74 15% |
| Random Read 4KB | 12.26 | 28.02 129% | 20.25 65% | 17.9 46% | 18.78 53% |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.57 | 11.4 -27% | 7.95 -49% | 28.31 82% | 7.32 -53% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 39.5 | 15.56 -61% | 27.68 -30% | 65.5 66% | 32.08 -19% |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 20.59 | 11.87 -42% | 16.17 -21% | 51.1 148% | 18.17 -12% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Wileyfox Spark X audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Moto G4 Play audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Blackview R7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9.8% lower than median
(-) | mids are not linear (15.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (44.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Liquid Zest Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 39.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG X Power K220 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 41.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.06 / 0.16 Watt |
| Idle |  0.53 / 1.76 / 1.86 Watt |
| Load |
3.97 / 4.21 Watt |
    
| |
| Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh | LG X Power K220 4100 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | 3% | -115% | -16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.53 | 0.64 -21% | 0.68 -28% | 1.83 -245% | 0.83 -57% |
| Idle Average * | 1.76 | 1.3 26% | 1.58 10% | 3.21 -82% | 2.06 -17% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.86 | 1.34 28% | 1.61 13% | 3.45 -85% | 2.08 -12% |
| Load Average * | 3.97 | 4.18 -5% | 3.36 15% | 5.67 -43% | 3.53 11% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.21 | 4.87 -16% | 3.91 7% | 9.16 -118% | 4.49 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
| Wileyfox Spark X 3000 mAh | LG X Power K220 4100 mAh | Blackview R7 3000 mAh | Lenovo Moto G4 Play 2800 mAh | Acer Liquid Zest Plus 5000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 42% | -39% | 11% | 21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1381 | 1998 45% | |||
| H.264 | 777 | 683 -12% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 675 | 987 46% | 412 -39% | 630 -7% | 815 21% |
| Load | 264 | 365 38% | 306 16% |
Pros
Cons
Wileyfox在Spark X的描述中写道：“最合理的屏幕尺寸和电池续航让这台智能手机可以成为你的理想多媒体伴侣”。整体上，Spark X确实有一些优势：长续航，可更换电池，优秀的工艺品质和不错的材质。而明亮清晰的屏幕和低售价也都让人不禁侧目。
Wileyfox Spark X的设计重心放在了一些特定方面：时尚的设计和长电池续航以及180欧（约1309人民币）的实惠价位。正在寻找高性价比智能手机的用户可以考虑一下Wileyfox Spark X。
这样一台低价设备也自然有不少不足之处：它的性能一般，响应迟缓，通话质量一般，拍照效果较差（特别是暗光下），未搭配电源适配器，低分辨率（仅720p）和机身坚固性等。如果你能接受这些缺点的话，它可能会十分适合你。如果不能的话则不妨看看同价位的其他设备，这个市场区间竞争激烈，用户有很多选择。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Wileyfox Spark X
-
11/29/2016 v5.1(old)
Michael Moser