Notebookcheck

华硕 VivoBook E200HA (x5-Z8350, 32 GB) 小型笔记本简短评测

Sebastian Bade (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 09/01/2017
Notebook Windows

物美价廉?华硕VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS是一台11.6英寸的小型笔记本电脑,以三种配色来吸引消费者。机内配有四核处理器。在我们的评测中,你将了解到该小型电脑的价格。

Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS (VivoBook Series)
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 20.19.15.4364
Memory
2048 MB 
, DDR3
Display
11.6 inch 16:9, 1366x768 pixel 135 PPI, Chi Mei CMN1130, N116BGE-EB2, TN LED, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Cherry Trail
Storage
Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC, 32 GB 
, 10 GB free
Soundcard
Intel SST Audio Device
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: stereo, SonicMaster, Card Reader: Micro-SD, Micro-HDMI
Networking
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 17.5 x 286 x 193
Battery
38 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: VGA 640x480
Additional features
Speakers: SonicMaster sound, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, power supply, Office 365 (1 year subscription), 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
976 g, Power Supply: 130 g
Price
249 EUR

 

Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS

Size Comparison

Connections

Left: power, microSD card reader, Micro-HDMI, USB 3.0
Left: power, microSD card reader, Micro-HDMI, USB 3.0
Right: Audio combo (Mic-In, Line-Out), USB 2.0
Right: Audio combo (Mic-In, Line-Out), USB 2.0
Front: status LEDs
Front: status LEDs
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
315 MBit/s ∼100%
Jumper EZbook 3
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
86 MBit/s ∼27% -73%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
237 MBit/s ∼100%
Jumper EZbook 3
Realtek RTL8723B USB 2.0
78 MBit/s ∼33% -67%
280
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
277
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
250
cd/m²
259
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 280 cd/m² Average: 265 cd/m² Minimum: 16.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 222 cd/m²
Contrast: 763:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.67 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 7.84 | - Ø
65% sRGB (Argyll) 42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.3
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
HP Stream 11-r000ng
TN, 1366x768, 11.6
Jumper EZbook 3
TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1
Medion Akoya S2218
IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Response Times
-16%
-22%
-47%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
45 (25, 20)
44 (24, 20)
2%
46 (25, 21)
-2%
27 (7, 20)
40%
33.6 (18.8, 14.8)
25%
Response Time Black / White *
18 (14, 4)
24 (8, 16)
-33%
11.6 (7.7, 3.8)
36%
33 (14, 19)
-83%
28 (16.4, 11.6)
-56%
PWM Frequency
24750 (30)
200 (99)
-99%
200 (90)
-99%
20830 (99)
-16%
Screen
-22%
-64%
12%
18%
Brightness
265
248
-6%
341
29%
394
49%
255
-4%
Brightness Distribution
85
84
-1%
76
-11%
88
4%
85
0%
Black Level *
0.35
0.5
-43%
1.28
-266%
0.43
-23%
0.31
11%
Contrast
763
528
-31%
300
-61%
970
27%
887
16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.67
9.78
-47%
8.7
-30%
6.7
-0%
5.2
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
7.84
11.16
-42%
11.1
-42%
6.25
20%
2.8
64%
Gamma
2.3 104%
2.44 98%
2.2 109%
2.48 97%
2.28 105%
CCT
8076 80%
12954 50%
12445 52%
5954 109%
6861 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
42
41
-2%
46
10%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
65
63
-3%
69
6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-19% / -21%
-43% / -50%
-18% / -4%
1% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 24750 Hz30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 24750 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 24750 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Grayscales
Grayscales
Color accuracy
Color accuracy
Saturation
Saturation
The Asus VivoBook E200HA in the sun
The Asus VivoBook E200HA in the sun
The Asus VivoBook E200HA in the shade
The Asus VivoBook E200HA in the shade
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
DPC latencies
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
46 Points ∼24% +70%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel Celeron N3050
28 Points ∼14% +4%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
27 Points ∼14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
95 Points ∼4%
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
84 Points ∼4% -12%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel Celeron N3050
57 Points ∼3% -40%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
79.1 Points ∼24% +127%
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
Mediatek MT8173C
57.116 Points ∼17% +64%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
34.804 Points ∼10%
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
27 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
95 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
11.32 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel Celeron N3350
1592 Points ∼27% +9%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel Celeron N3050
1487 Points ∼25% +2%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
1464 Points ∼25%
Medion Akoya S2218
Intel Atom Z3735F
1027 Points ∼17% -30%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
1464 points
Help
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC
HP Stream 11-r000ng
32 GB eMMC Flash
Jumper EZbook 3
Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC
Medion Akoya S2218
64 GB eMMC Flash
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-12%
-54%
-32%
Write 4k QD32
28.32
13.21
-53%
2.74
-90%
8.734
-69%
Read 4k QD32
30.25
46.51
54%
16.4
-46%
37.24
23%
Write 4k
19.23
13.16
-32%
2.47
-87%
9.817
-49%
Read 4k
16.62
18.25
10%
5.07
-69%
15.25
-8%
Write 512
108.8
59.93
-45%
41.3
-62%
58.71
-46%
Read 512
154.9
165.8
7%
133
-14%
98.4
-36%
Write Seq
115.3
76.57
-34%
50
-57%
52.67
-54%
Read Seq
163.2
154.2
-6%
151
-7%
140.2
-14%
Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC
Sequential Read: 163.2 MB/s
Sequential Write: 115.3 MB/s
512K Read: 154.9 MB/s
512K Write: 108.8 MB/s
4K Read: 16.62 MB/s
4K Write: 19.23 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 30.25 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 28.32 MB/s
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Jumper EZbook 3
Intel HD Graphics 500, Intel Celeron N3350
458 Points ∼1% +32%
HP Stream 11-r000ng
Intel HD Graphics (Braswell), Intel Celeron N3050
375 Points ∼1% +8%
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Intel Atom x5-Z8350
348 Points ∼1%
3DMark 11 Performance
395 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 18.78.8fps
F1 2013 (2013) 2817fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 16.212.37.9fps
F1 2014 (2014) 2716fps
GTA V (2015) 14.3fps
Dirt Rally (2015) 40.111.7fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 8.55.6fps
FIFA 16 (2015) 36.514.29fps
Overwatch (2016) 159.5fps
Farming Simulator 17 (2016) 20.95.8fps
Resident Evil 7 (2017) 10.7fps
Max. Load
 40.6 °C39.4 °C27.1 °C 
 35.6 °C35.1 °C26.3 °C 
 27.6 °C27.1 °C24.9 °C 
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 31.5 °C
25.5 °C35.6 °C40.2 °C
25.3 °C30.2 °C37.1 °C
25.8 °C27.3 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 40.2 °C
Average: 30.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  33.4 °C | Room Temperature 22.3 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HP Stream 11-r000ng
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell)
Jumper EZbook 3
N3350, HD Graphics 500
Medion Akoya S2218
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250
Heat
-4%
2%
-14%
13%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.6
42.7
-5%
41
-1%
42.4
-4%
33
19%
Maximum Bottom *
40.2
41.3
-3%
42
-4%
49.7
-24%
36
10%
Idle Upper Side *
28.8
29
-1%
27
6%
32
-11%
25.2
12%
Idle Bottom *
29.4
31.2
-6%
27
8%
34
-16%
25.8
12%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.629.831.6253131.2313130.630.430.64028.528.928.55030.729.430.76328.127.828.18027.825.927.810027.127.127.112527.324.927.316026.324.226.320026.822.526.825036.821.536.831543.220.743.240047.120.247.150050.619.250.663050.918.450.980062.718.162.7100068.817.568.8125068.517.268.5160065.517.565.5200065.617.365.6250067.217.367.2315066.317.666.3400069.417.669.4500074.117.774.1630069.917.969.9800066.51866.51000061.118.261.11250066.618.266.61600064.618.364.6SPL80.130.180.1N42.51.442.5median 64.6Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TSmedian 18.2median 64.6Delta11.81.411.85346.35139.15341.740.543.836.941.74038.841.738.64039.844.143.336.539.841.342.94336.641.341.941.143.835.741.937.143.342.132.537.136.939.743.532.136.936.540.244.329.436.538.341.545.82938.338.344.54729.338.340.946.65126.840.948.754.757.826.248.753.758.661.924.353.753.458.461.723.853.452.658.361.72352.658.264.167.622.158.256.7636621.456.752.958.661.721.452.950.256.659.820.650.258.164.468.120.258.159.966.269.620.359.951.257.360.819.851.245.75255.419.845.741.74851.619.741.753.459.863.119.553.450.75759.519.550.745.852.155.119.445.843.750.454.119.243.742.348.553.219.142.366.572.776.133.466.520.229.436.12.120.2median 50.2Medion Akoya S2218median 56.6median 59.5median 21.4median 50.25.75.54.93.25.7hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Medion Akoya S2218 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 19%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.25 / 0.37 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.3 / 6 / 6.3 Watt
Load midlight 11.4 / 10.8 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), Hynix HBG4a2 32 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6
HP Stream 11-r000ng
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1366x768, 11.6
Jumper EZbook 3
N3350, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1
Medion Akoya S2218
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6
Power Consumption
10%
-4%
-10%
32%
Idle Minimum *
4.3
3.1
28%
3.18
26%
3.8
12%
1.5
65%
Idle Average *
6
4.8
20%
6.14
-2%
7.2
-20%
5.4
10%
Idle Maximum *
6.3
5.1
19%
6.4
-2%
7.3
-16%
5.5
13%
Load Average *
11.4
11.9
-4%
13.3
-17%
11.8
-4%
6.3
45%
Load Maximum *
10.8
12.3
-14%
13.6
-26%
13
-20%
7.9
27%

* ... smaller is better

Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS
Z8350, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 38 Wh
HP Stream 11-r000ng
N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 37 Wh
Jumper EZbook 3
N3350, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh
Medion Akoya S2218
Z3735F, HD Graphics (Bay Trail), 43 Wh
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
534
515
-4%
420
-21%
500
-6%
764
43%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Surfing v1.3 (Edge 25.10586.672.0)
8h 54min

Pros

+ 价格有吸引力
+ 操作无声
+ 良好的输入配件
+ 舒适的打字感觉
+ 电池续航长
+ 低功耗
+ 重量轻

Cons

- 没有键盘背光
- 盖子可以更加坚固
- TN面板视角不稳定
- 只有2 GB的运行内存
- 只有32GB闪存空间
Asus VivoBook E200HA, test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de
Asus VivoBook E200HA, test unit provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

华硕VivoBook E200HA是一台11.6英寸的小型笔记本。虽说,这台机器不是当下最快的,但它249欧元(约294美元)的价格对消费者来说很有吸引力。消费者将能以此价格,获得一台带有节能的四核处理器的小机器。低重量很好的说明它的便携性,而且该设备还相对坚固。如果我们这台白色的测试机没能吸引到你,你还能购买时尚的蓝色或者金色VivoBook E200HA。

华硕在VivoBook E200HA中封装了非常节能的组件,导致了这台11英寸子小型笔记本有着非常好的、引人注目的排放值。良好的输入配件和长时间的电池续航也为VivoBook E200HA代言。

我们同样被输入配件所折服,即便我们也喜欢背光键盘。该设备在内置显示屏的测试单元失去了一些重要的分数。TN面板不适合户外使用。另外,视角也明显受限,色彩空间覆盖也是如此。在存储方面,操作系统对于32 GB来说太大了。操作系统使用了一半以上的空间,所以几乎没有剩余的用户空间。运行内存也是如此——非常有限的2 GB。任何真正考虑购买华硕VivoBook E200HA的人都应该选择具有64 GB或甚至128 GB存储空间的版本。可惜,运行内存由于不能拓展而不存在更多选择。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Asus VivoBook E200HA-FD0041TS - 07/28/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
78 /  98 → 79%
Keyboard
79%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
36 / 80 → 45%
Weight
75 / 78 → 94%
Battery
91%
Display
76%
Games Performance
34 / 68 → 49%
Application Performance
43 / 87 → 49%
Temperature
93 / 91 → 100%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
37 / 85 → 43%
Average
67%
81%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook E200HA (x5-Z8350, 32 GB) 小型笔记本简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2017-09- 1 (Update: 2017-09-11)