对联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 的评测结论
联想为其 Tab Plus 推出了第二代产品，进行了重大升级：这款平板电脑不仅外观焕然一新，而且保留了其核心优势，并改进了原有不足之处：
内置的圆形支架现在提供了更加灵活多变的放置方式，甚至可以将其安装在墙上。音效更加震撼，屏幕亮度也显著提升。此外，联想在此设备中未采用PWM调光技术，因此对PWM调光敏感的用户应该不会遇到任何问题。
联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 的性能和存储速度也比前代产品显著提升，而且得益于大容量电池，在日常使用中续航时间非常长。
由于其独特的设计，这款平板电脑并不适合所有使用场景，因为它相当笨重——最厚处超过两厘米。软件支持方面也有待延长。
总体而言，Tab Plus Gen 2 凭借出色的音质和极佳的多媒体性能给人留下深刻印象。看到一款平板电脑能够摆脱纤薄金属机身和 OLED 显示屏的常规单调设计，也令人欣喜。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 已在多家零售商处有售。
在 amazon.com 上，其当前售价约为 470 美元。
规格
案例与功能——内容繁重，但值得一读
与第一代 Tab Plus 相比，其重量显著增加：联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 重达 775 克，因此它算不上是最便携的平板电脑。至少联想设计了一款保护套，让你可以像挎肩包一样携带 Tab Plus Gen 2。
机身设计也颇为独特：虽然实际厚度仅为6.8毫米，但中间的大型扬声器和支架使总厚度达到略低于2.3厘米。整机采用哑光金属机身，握持舒适，做工精良。
该平板提供128 GB或256 GB两种存储容量可选，并可通过microSD卡扩展存储空间。在我们的测试中，读卡器的读卡速度相当快。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 79.2, n=44, last 2 years) | |
跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)
通信与操作 – 无指纹传感器
该平板电脑没有 5G 版本，而且与前代产品不同，其 Wi-Fi 版本也不支持卫星定位。
在我们使用华硕 RT-BE96U 参考路由器进行的测试中，Tab Plus Gen 2 内置的 Wi-Fi 6 调制解调器达到了约 400 Mbit/s 的速度，这在价格亲民的中端平板电脑中属于典型水平。在我们的对比测试中，只有 Poco Pad X1 展示了即使在这个价格区间内也能实现更高的速度。 不过，对于大多数日常任务而言，Tab Plus Gen 2的Wi-Fi速度已经足够快。
与前代产品一样，这款平板电脑兼容联想Tab Pen Plus触控笔，该触控笔需单独购买。它支持4,096级压力感应，并通过蓝牙与平板电脑连接。
触摸屏用手指操作时也能非常精准。不同寻常的是，硬件按键位于机身背面，但经过短暂适应后，使用起来同样舒适。该设备未配备指纹传感器，仅提供面部识别作为生物识别认证方式。
| Networking | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average of class Tablet | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
软件与可持续发展——4年的安全保障
Android 16 已预装在设备中，预计更新将持续至 2030 年，但计划中仅有两个新的 Android 版本。因此，不要指望能长期获得新软件更新。
包装采用无塑料设计，但目前尚无该产品在可持续性方面的其他数据。
相机——可接受的图像质量
联想并未过分强调摄像头性能，但机身背面配备的1300万像素传感器，只要不进行过度的变焦，拍摄出的照片效果还算不错。
800万像素前置摄像头拍摄的照片可能会显得有些颗粒感，但总体来说还是可以接受的。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
PlantSurroundingLow Light
显示 – 亮度充足
IPS 屏幕的分辨率更高，亮度也比该平板电脑的前代机型更高。这使得联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 能够更有效地与同价位平板电脑竞争。我们在日常使用中测得最高亮度可达 680 cd/m²，因此您甚至可以带着这款平板电脑到户外使用。
屏幕色彩还原相当准确，且在低亮度下不会出现 PWM 闪烁现象。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Center on Battery: 680 cd/m²
Contrast: 1619:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
99.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.124
CCT: 6656 K
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1" | Lenovo Tab Plus IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5" | Oppo Pad 5 LCD, 2800x1980, 12.1" | Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 TFT-LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 33% | -2% | ||
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 695 | 903 30% | 788 13% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 684 | 926 35% | 574 -16% | |
| Response Times | -92% | 0% | -40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 22.8 ? | 51 ? -124% | 25.1 ? -10% | 35.42 ? -55% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 14.5 ? | 23.2 ? -60% | 13.1 ? 10% | 18.09 ? -25% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | ||||
| Screen | -35% | -18% | -31% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 680 | 465 -32% | 892 31% | 794 17% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.42 | 0.3 29% | 0.8 -90% | 0.47 -12% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1619 | 1550 -4% | 1115 -31% | 1689 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 2.96 -14% | 1.17 55% | 2.2 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.86 | 5.32 9% | 4.67 20% | 5.8 1% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 3.6 -200% | 2.3 -92% | 3.7 -208% |
| Gamma | 2.124 104% | 2.372 93% | 2.415 91% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6656 98% | 6016 108% | 6856 95% | 6962 93% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 438 | 862 | 727 | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 88 | 93 | 89 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -64% /
-50% | 5% /
-4% | -24% /
-27% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7638 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池续航——出色的扬声器，超长的续航能力
该平板采用联发科天玑 7400 作为系统级芯片（SoC）。这为其提供了足够的日常使用性能，使其运行速度比前代产品显著提升。在执行资源密集型任务时，虽然无法始终保证运行流畅，但若仅是浏览菜单或执行简单任务，则不应遇到任何问题。 内存运行速度快。
即使在长时间高负载运行下，机身也几乎不会出现明显的发热现象。3DMark压力测试显示，性能未出现可察觉的降频。
联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 最大的亮点是其音响系统，共计配备了九个扬声器。机身背部的中央单元以及两侧共设有 4 个高音扬声器、3 个低音炮和 2 个被动辐射器。 您确实能听出其中的差异：声音饱满且细节丰富，总体而言，这是近年来我们在平板电脑上听过的最佳音效之一。
如果需要，您甚至可以将其他设备连接到 Tab Plus Gen 2，将其作为蓝牙音箱使用。
电池性能也显著提升：其容量现已达到10,200毫安时，在我们的Wi-Fi测试中续航时间接近29小时。因此，即使你连续工作或流媒体播放24小时，这款平板也不会很快没电。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Average of class Tablet (5.2 - 301, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Average of class Tablet (5.6 - 323, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Tablet (3.1 - 94, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Average of class Tablet (2 - 134, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Average of class Tablet (0.81 - 57, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 | Lenovo Tab Plus | Oppo Pad 5 | Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | 44% | 145% | 11% | 63% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s) | 1433 | 991.99 -31% | 1922.71 34% | 4068.41 184% | 1584 ? 11% | 2112 ? 47% |
| Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s) | 759 | 837.52 10% | 1674.97 121% | 3751.24 394% | 807 ? 6% | 1703 ? 124% |
| Random Read 4KB (MB/s) | 233 | 240.56 3% | 208.83 -10% | 203.66 -13% | 246 ? 6% | 280 ? 20% |
| Random Write 4KB (MB/s) | 206 | 221.09 7% | 266.49 29% | 237.72 15% | 249 ? 21% | 330 ? 60% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
3DMark 压力测试
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
| Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
| Oppo Pad 5 | |
| Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 | |
Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 98.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 98.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 98.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (114.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 130%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
| Off / Standby |   0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
| Idle |  1.2 / 1.7 / 1.8 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 10200 mAh | Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh | Oppo Pad 5 10420 mAh | Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 8850 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -26% | -15% | 0% | -116% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.2 | 1.2 -0% | 1.8 -50% | 0.7 42% | 1.2 ? -0% | 2.16 ? -80% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.7 | 1.6 6% | 1.9 -12% | 2.45 -44% | 1.7 ? -0% | 3.9 ? -129% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.8 | 1.8 -0% | 2.1 -17% | 2.58 -43% | 1.8 ? -0% | 4.29 ? -138% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 3.7 | 6.7 | 7.31 | 8.87 ? | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 5.7 | 9 | 9.17 | 14.4 ? |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 10200 mAh | Lenovo Tab Plus 8600 mAh | Oppo Pad 5 10420 mAh | Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 8850 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -16% | -34% | -52% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 28.9 | 24.2 -16% | 19.1 -34% | 13.9 -52% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 44.3 | |||
| H.264 (h) | 18.6 | |||
| Load (h) | 6.1 | 4.2 |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
联想 Tab Plus Gen 2 价格实惠、品质上乘且独具特色。
由于其笨重的设计，它当然并不适合所有使用场景，但与此同时，其音质确实令人印象深刻。
Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2
- 09/17/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt
Total Sustainability Score: 可能替代方案的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Drive | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 80.6%  | Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 429€ | 775 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS |
2. 77.8%  | Lenovo Tab Plus Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.2 | List Price: 299 Euro | 660 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 11.50" 2000x1200 204 PPI IPS |
3. 80.9%  | Oppo Pad 5 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 3.1 | List Price: 459€ | 577 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 12.10" 2800x1980 283 PPI LCD |
4. 85.8%  | Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 732 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x | List Price: 389€ | 500 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 11.20" 3200x2136 344 PPI TFT-LCD |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
