Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 11 scores (from 14 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 10.1
巨人智能机。 握着10.1寸的平板在耳边打电话?这主意有些奇怪,不过从几年前三星就已经开始为我们提供了这个可能性。我们的评测将告诉你第四代的Galaxy Tab是如何在竞争中脱颖而出的。
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 might be cheaper but the newer Nexus 9 outclasses it in almost every area. This is understandable because it's newer so if you can jump the price gap, you'll be much better off with Google's flagship tablet.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 12/05/2014
Source: PC Mag
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionLike its 7- and 8-inch siblings, the Galaxy Tab 4 10.1 exudes mediocrity. The competition isn't quite as fierce in the 10-inch space, and most every other manufacturer is defaulting towards the low-end for their large screen tablets. As such, the Tab 4 compares favorably with tablets like the Asus Transformer Pad TF103C and Lenovo A10£195.97 at Laptops Direct. The Tab 4 easily eclipses the A10, but at $299 with an included keyboard dock, the Transformer Pad is more useful and a better value.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/24/2014
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Konsument.at - Heft 12/2014

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Connect - Heft 09/2014

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/25/2014
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% features: 83% display: 84% mobility: 64%
Source: SFT - Heft 08/2014

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 08/2014

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2014
Rating: Total score: 89%
Source: Areamobile
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2014
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 62% mobility: 76% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/01/2014
Source: Wintech
PT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/23/2014
Rating: Total score: 85% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: 01Net

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/21/2014
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Teleguru
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 60% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Notebook-Center.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/21/2014
Source: Notebook-Center.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/09/2014
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
400 MSM8226: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
