Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 11 scores (from 18 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
A bit of business. Samsung wants to participate more strongly in the business field with its Galaxy Tab Active. The tablet is not only dust and waterproof, but it also protected against drops. It might just be an interesting alternative for field workers with LTE and stylus inputting.
Source: On MSFT
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, with a few small upgrades such as a better camera and another speaker, the Samsung Galaxy Tab Active could be a decent device for the consumer market. However, this is not Samsung’s goal when the company created the Tab Active. Instead, the device is intended for the professional environment, especially in areas where other tablets would be much too delicate and fragile.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/27/2015
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Mag
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Galaxy Tab Active delivers on its promised ruggedness, surviving the kinds of mayhem you're likely to encounter when you take a tablet away from the relative safety of a desk job. Coupled with the enterprise class support built into the Tab Active, the device would be just about ideal for an on-the-go worker -- if the device had the ability to add cellular connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2015
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionUnfortunately, the device doesn't offer some of the bells and whistles of consumer-friendly devices. The cameras don't pack much pop and the screen resolution isn't on-par with the Galaxy Tab S. The Galaxy Tab Active doesn't offer much storage, so you won't want to use this as a two-in-one device for heavier computing.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/12/2014
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 7/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: MobiFlip
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/08/2015
Source: Com! - Heft 07/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 69%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 7/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Stiftung Warentest - Heft 6/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Tom's Hardware
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2015
Source: e-media - Heft 08/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect Freestyle - Heft 2/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2015
Source: Connect - Heft 2/2015

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/01/2015
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/04/2014
Source: Tabletowo
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/19/2014
Rating: Total score: 73%
Source: Tablety
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/04/2014
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Ixbt
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2015
Source: Notebook-Center.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2015
Source: Ferra.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/06/2014
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 305:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
400 MSM8926: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
