Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar三星Galaxy Tab Active Pro (LTE, SM-T545)平板电脑评测：拥有超长续航的户外专家
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.9 % | 08/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 SD 670, Adreno 616 | 653 g | 9.9 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85.4 % | 01/2020 | Apple iPad 7 2019 A10 Fusion, A10 Fusion GPU | 483 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
| 79.4 % | 02/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F SD 439, Adreno 505 | 580 g | 23 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
| 81.3 % | 11/2017 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 7870 Octa, Mali-T830 MP2 | 512 g | 13 mm | 8.00" | 1280x800 | |
| 83.1 % | 05/2020 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 467 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Notebookcheck-Maskottchen (Szene 1)Schloss (Szene 2)Schloss-Ansicht bei 5-fachem Zoom (Szene 3)Lowlight-Umgebung (Szene 4)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 601 cd/m²
Contrast: 897:1 (Black: 0.67 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
94.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Apple iPad 7 2019 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20 | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8.00 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite TFT, 2000x1200, 10.40 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 25% | -5% | -9% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle | 601 | 499 -17% | 392 -35% | 509 -15% | 503 -16% |
| Brightness | 554 | 470 -15% | 359 -35% | 477 -14% | 477 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 88 1% | 91 5% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.67 | 0.49 27% | 0.36 46% | 0.48 28% | 0.29 57% |
| Contrast | 897 | 1018 13% | 1089 21% | 1060 18% | 1734 93% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 0.97 56% | 2.7 -23% | 3.45 -57% | 4.4 -100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.5 | 1.98 64% | 5.4 2% | 5.17 6% | 10.4 -89% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 0.9 72% | 3.8 -19% | 4.5 -41% | 7.5 -134% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.135 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7129 91% | 6571 99% | 7276 89% | 7171 91% | 7700 84% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 61350 Hz | ≤ 36 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 61350 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 36 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 61350 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 55.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (189340 - 190804, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (32.1 - 33.6, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (57.3 - 135.7, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (49.1 - 57.6, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (53 - 66, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (29.6 - 33.7, n=3) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
| Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (10245 - 11312, n=4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F (Chrome 79) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 (Chrome 83.0.4103.96) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 (3361 - 3655, n=4) | |
| Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPad 7 2019 (Safari 13) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 3% | -33% | 182% | 5% | 296% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 294.5 | 295.6 0% | 218.1 -26% | 483.7 64% | 273 ? -7% | 850 ? 189% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 207.5 | 238.9 15% | 54 -74% | 219.3 6% | 176.8 ? -15% | 532 ? 156% |
| Random Read 4KB | 71.2 | 64.8 -9% | 25.96 -64% | 119.8 68% | 59.1 ? -17% | 167 ? 135% |
| Random Write 4KB | 18.75 | 16.76 -11% | 10.98 -41% | 195.8 944% | 31.7 ? 69% | 150.8 ? 704% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 75.9 ? | 86.5 ? 14% | 78.6 4% | 78.3 ? 3% | 77.4 ? 2% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.6 ? | 65.4 ? 8% | 64.3 6% | 65.3 ? 8% | 58.3 ? -4% |
Asphalt 9: Legends & PUBG Mobile
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad 7 2019 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.31 Watt |
| Idle |  1.34 / 4.43 / 4.52 Watt |
| Load |
5.91 / 7.91 Watt |
    
| |
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 7600 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -69% | 3% | 31% | -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.34 | 2.2 -64% | 1.28 4% | 0.89 34% | 1.21 10% |
| Idle Average * | 4.43 | 6.7 -51% | 4.5 -2% | 3.13 29% | 4.24 4% |
| Idle Maximum * | 4.52 | 8.2 -81% | 4.59 -2% | 3.36 26% | 4.34 4% |
| Load Average * | 5.91 | 11.3 -91% | 5.71 3% | 3.93 34% | 6.99 -18% |
| Load Maximum * | 7.91 | 12.5 -58% | 6.99 12% | 5.45 31% | 8.79 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545 7600 mAh | Apple iPad 7 2019 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Smart Tab YT-X705F 7000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 4450 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S6 Lite 7040 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -40% | -24% | -30% | -21% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2693 | 1486 -45% | 2083 -23% | 1357 -50% | 2120 -21% |
| H.264 | 1230 | 802 -35% | 919 -25% | 493 -60% | 950 -23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 990 | 707 -29% | 795 -20% | 895 -10% | 792 -20% |
| Load | 388 | 196 -49% | 288 -26% | 396 2% | 309 -20% |
Pros
Cons
总结——价格高昂但好用的特殊用途板：
三星Galaxy Active Pro厚重而坚固的外壳可能不是设计最精美的平板电脑-但这绝不是这款坚固耐用的Android的目的。该设备可在其他平板电脑挤兑的市场里蓬勃发展-在具有挑战性的使用条件下。
如果您正在寻找户外使用的平板电脑，您会发现Galaxy Tab Active Pro是可靠且持久的伴侣。可更换电池在增加了另一个相当独特的功能。三星还包括了S-Pen，考虑到LTE版本的690美元的高价，这已经足够公平了。 Wi-Fi-Version并不便宜多少，要价600美元。
三星Galaxy Tab Active Pro是强大的伙伴，具有许多出色的功能。不幸的是，它也相当昂贵。
该平板电脑当前运行Android 上，但有望在2020年9月收到对Android 10的更新。三星还承诺，自产品于10月发布以来，将对Wi-Fi和LTE版本的软件进行四年的更新。
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Pro T545
-
06/12/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero
Pricecompare
