Samsung Galaxy A20e
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, Selfie-Licht
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 16 reviews)
Reviews for the Samsung Galaxy A20e
Spending a lot of money for a smartphone? It doesn't have to be like that, Samsung says, presenting its affordable entry-level Galaxy A20e for 179 Euros (~$199). It is able to score with astonishingly comprehensive equipment, offering an octa-core SoC, a dual camera, Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, dual SIM, and VoLTE, among other things.
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionCompact phones such are becoming rare nowadays, so this handset will definitely appeal to people looking for a device that’s easier to handle. The A20e impresses on first impressions, with an intuitive user experience enhanced by solid speakers and great cameras for the price. However, extended usage reveals some frustrations, most notably the low quality display and sub-par battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Sam Mobile
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWe are sure you have, by now, caught on to the gist of this review. The Galaxy A20e is a cheap device, and it is not hard to spot all the concessions Samsung made in order to keep it affordable. By itself, that is just fine, and if you do not care about performance or display quality, this compact phone should serve you well. Battery life is fine, plus it charges quickly. Daylight camera performance does not disappoint.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/07/2019
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/18/2019
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 73% price: 70% features: 75% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Tutto Android
IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 62% performance: 50% mobility: 68% workmanship: 70%
Source: CNet France
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Komorkomania
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/16/2019
Source: Viettelstore
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/16/2019
Source: Viettelstore
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/11/2019
Source: Danviet
VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Short, Date: 04/12/2019
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Mobil DK
DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 61% display: 60% mobility: 70% workmanship: 50%
Source: Mobil.se
SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Arena IT
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 90% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerblog.ro
→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/02/2019
Comment
ARM Mali-G71 MP2:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Exynos 7884B: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.