Notebookcheck

华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS笔记本电脑评测：一台有着强劲性能的特殊游戏本

双屏。 凭借强大的硬件，Zephyrus Duo设法在其4K屏幕（IPS，经过Pantone验证，100％AdobeRGB，G-Sync）上流畅地运行最新游戏。 它还具有其他强大功能：2个NVMe SSD（RAID 0），32 GB RAM（双通道模式），Thunderbolt3。此外，笔记本电脑还随附许多配件。
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (translated by Zewei Shen),
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Touchscreen Windows
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Processor
Intel Core i9-10980HK 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q - 8192 MB, Core: 735-1080 MHz, Memory: 1375 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bit interface, 27.21.14.5148 (Nvidia 451.48), Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200,双通道
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 282 PPI, AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, G-Sync, X-Rite Pantone, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0), 2048 GB 
, 1780 GB free
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 麦克风输入，耳机（组合音频插孔）, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 360 x 268
Battery
90 Wh, 5675 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15.4 V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, Headset, gaming mouse, external webcam, palm rest, second charger (Type-C USB) and laptop sleeve, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), MS Office 365, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.512 kg, Power Supply: 625 g
Price
4500 Euro
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
09/2020
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		2.5 kg20 mm15.6"3840x2160
06/2020
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		2.1 kg18 mm15.6"1920x1080
83 %
06/2020
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.2 kg20 mm15.6"1920x1080
85 %
06/2020
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.2 kg20 mm15.6"3840x2160
Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)
Left: AC adapter, microphone input, combined audio jack (headset)
Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Right: 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), Thunderbolt 3 (DP 1.4, Power Delivery 3.0)
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-A), HDMI 2.0b
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1390 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1320 MBit/s ∼95% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1260 MBit/s ∼91%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (289 - 1722, n=105)
1216 MBit/s ∼87% -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1170 MBit/s ∼84% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (141 - 1670, n=358)
748 MBit/s ∼54% -41%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1340 MBit/s ∼100% +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1330 MBit/s ∼99% +3%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1310 MBit/s ∼98% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1290 MBit/s ∼96%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=105)
1085 MBit/s ∼81% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1645, n=358)
688 MBit/s ∼51% -47%
401
cd/m²		398
cd/m²		361
cd/m²
401
cd/m²		398
cd/m²		360
cd/m²
385
cd/m²		395
cd/m²		368
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 401 cd/m² Average: 385.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 398 cd/m²
Contrast: 1421:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.53 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8, calibrated: 0.77
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
AU Optronics B156ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO7A8C), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
AUO B156HAN12.0 (AUO328E), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6
Response Times
66%
68%
95%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
56.4 (26.4, 30)
14.4 (7.2, 7.2)
74%
14 (6.8, 7.2)
75%
2.2 (1, 1.2)
96%
Response Time Black / White *
24.4 (10, 14.4)
10.4 (5.2, 5.2)
57%
9.6 (5.2, 4.4)
61%
1.8 (1, 0.8)
93%
PWM Frequency
60 (80)
Screen
-48%
-31%
-30%
Brightness middle
398
320
-20%
316
-21%
385
-3%
Brightness
385
318
-17%
311
-19%
390
1%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
92
2%
93
3%
Black Level *
0.28
0.24
14%
0.21
25%
Contrast
1421
1333
-6%
1505
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.53
4.03
-163%
3.03
-98%
2.46
-61%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.69
8.43
-128%
7.32
-98%
4.01
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.77
0.98
-27%
1.1
-43%
2.6
-238%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
5.94
-148%
3.9
-63%
1.39
42%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.42 91%
2.42 91%
2.31 95%
CCT
6996 93%
6751 96%
7439 87%
6395 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
100
66
-34%
65
-35%
98
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
99
-1%
100
0%
100
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / -31%
19% / -16%
33% / -7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
24.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
56.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.4 ms rise
↘ 30 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17507 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 
01020304050607080901001101201301401501601701801902002102202302402502602702802903003103203303403503603703803904004104204304404504604704804905005105205305405505605705805906006106206306406506606706806907007107207307407507607707807908008108208308408508608708808909009109209309409509609709809901000101010201030104010501060107010801090110011101120113011401150116011701180119012001210122012301240125012601270128012901300131013201330134013501360137013801390140014101420143014401450146014701480149015001510152015301540155015601570158015901600161016201630164016501660167016801690170017101720173017401750176017701780179018001810182018301840185018601870Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1560 (1527.18-1799.01)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1213 (1201.27-1287.87)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK: Ø1541 (1518.31-1635.12)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1573 (1544.4-1818.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS Intel Core i9-10980HK, Intel Core i9-10980HK; Turbo: Ø1671 (1636.19-1862.18)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock rates during the CB15 loop (Turbo)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
205 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1799 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
147.46 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Cinebench R15 | Blender 2.79 | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
219 Points ∼100% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
213 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (201 - 219, n=10)
208 Points ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
205 Points ∼94%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points ∼92% -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
190 Points ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (77 - 219, n=622)
162 Points ∼74% -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
1862 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1818 (1544.4min - 1818.6max) Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1799 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (1614 - 1862, n=10)
1744 Points ∼94% -3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points ∼88% -9%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1288 (1201.27min - 1287.87max) Points ∼69% -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (196 - 2804, n=627)
925 Points ∼50% -49%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 901, n=87)
386 Seconds * ∼100% -33%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
368 Seconds * ∼95% -27%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * ∼76% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
292.8 Seconds * ∼76% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
290.5 Seconds * ∼75%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
285 Seconds * ∼74% +2%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (239 - 295, n=8)
279 Seconds * ∼72% +4%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
47455 MIPS ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
47170 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (43786 - 48730, n=8)
46539 MIPS ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
44959 MIPS ∼95% -5%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (3034 - 75612, n=88)
37036 MIPS ∼78% -22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
35130 MIPS ∼74% -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
5457 MIPS ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5364 MIPS ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (5081 - 5525, n=8)
5353 MIPS ∼98% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS ∼96% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
5081 MIPS ∼93% -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
5015 MIPS ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2480 - 5811, n=88)
4886 MIPS ∼90% -9%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
511 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
494 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (465 - 500, n=8)
485 Points ∼95% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points ∼93% -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
468 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 524, n=133)
450 Points ∼88% -9%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (3539 - 4487, n=8)
3907 Points ∼100% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
3801 Points ∼97% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3762 Points ∼96%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points ∼95% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=134)
2994 Points ∼77% -20%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
2932 Points ∼75% -22%
Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8416 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (7634 - 8666, n=7)
8249 Points ∼98% -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
8087 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=71)
6574 Points ∼78% -22%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
6216 Points ∼74% -26%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1401 Points ∼100%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
1347 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (1283 - 1401, n=7)
1343 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points ∼92% -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
1233 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1428, n=71)
1217 Points ∼87% -13%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
13 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (12.2 - 14.6, n=8)
12.9 fps ∼99% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.5 fps ∼96%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
12.5 fps ∼96% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.7 - 19.8, n=87)
10.2 fps ∼78% -18%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.1 fps ∼78% -19%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 95.8, n=64)
56.8 s ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
54.8 s ∼96%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s ∼92% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
52.4 s ∼92% -4%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
52.1 s ∼92% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (44 - 54.8, n=8)
50.4 s ∼89% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
48.89 s ∼86% -11%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.531 - 1.088, n=68)
0.619 sec * ∼100% -6%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.606 sec * ∼98% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
0.596 sec * ∼96% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * ∼96% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.582 sec * ∼94%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK
  (0.564 - 0.596, n=8)
0.577 sec * ∼93% +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.547 sec * ∼88% +6%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3821 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4210 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4762 points
PCMark 10 Score
5277 points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
6580 Points ∼100% +25%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6490 Points ∼99% +23%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5484 Points ∼83% +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2603 - 7511, n=305)
5329 Points ∼81% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
5277 Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
5277 Points ∼80% 0%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2484 - 6825, n=458)
5120 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
4762 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
4762 Points ∼93% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (2554 - 6093, n=475)
4291 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3821 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
3821 Points ∼89% 0%
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6243.8 μs * ∼100% -85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
3374.7 μs * ∼54%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
1916 μs * ∼31% +43%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
1877.3 μs * ∼30% +44%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3536 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3431 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 528.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 472.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2984 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2958 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 127.6 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)		Average 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-8%
-13%
-4%
0%
Write 4K
127.6
131.7
3%
131.3
3%
127.4
0%
128
0%
Read 4K
48.4
47.34
-2%
45.84
-5%
147.5
205%
48.4
0%
Write Seq
2958
2884
-3%
2370
-20%
485.9
-84%
2958
0%
Read Seq
2984
2303
-23%
1509
-49%
1352
-55%
2984
0%
Write 4K Q32T1
472.7
423.9
-10%
481.5
2%
476.5
1%
473
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
528.7
487.7
-8%
559.6
6%
531.2
0%
529
0%
Write Seq Q32T1
3431
2822
-18%
2392
-30%
1061
-69%
3431
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3536
3478
-2%
3232
-9%
2552
-28%
3536
0%
AS SSD
2%
-1%
-36%
0%
Copy Game MB/s
1404.1
1404
0%
Copy Program MB/s
604.27
604
0%
Copy ISO MB/s
2438.33
2438
0%
Score Total
4492
4677
4%
4950
10%
2594
-42%
4492
0%
Score Write
1688
2367
40%
2176
29%
1117
-34%
1688
0%
Score Read
1861
1529
-18%
1790
-4%
975
-48%
1861
0%
Access Time Write *
0.033
0.038
-15%
0.034
-3%
0.045
-36%
0.033
-0%
Access Time Read *
0.062
0.065
-5%
0.071
-15%
0.103
-66%
0.062
-0%
4K-64 Write
1296.26
2007.16
55%
1829.36
41%
929.38
-28%
1296
0%
4K-64 Read
1518.76
1205.16
-21%
1635.31
8%
789.2
-48%
1519
0%
4K Write
113.87
98.89
-13%
110.7
-3%
103.83
-9%
114
0%
4K Read
43.98
47.55
8%
48.09
9%
65.76
50%
44
0%
Seq Write
2783.45
2612.8
-6%
2359.82
-15%
836.4
-70%
2783
0%
Seq Read
2980.71
2766.61
-7%
1064.87
-64%
1200.02
-60%
2981
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -2%
-7% / -6%
-20% / -22%
0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280129013001310132013301340135013601370138013901400141014201430144014501460147014801490150015101520153015401550156015701580159016001610162016301640165016601670168016901700171017201730174017501760177017801790180018101820183018401850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000201020202030204020502060207020802090210021102120213021402150216021702180219022002210222022302240225022602270228022902300231023202330234023502360237023802390240024102420243024402450246024702480249025002510252025302540255025602570258025902600261026202630264026502660267026802690270027102720273027402750276027702780279028002810282028302840285028602870288028902900291029202930294029502960297029802990300030103020303030403050306030703080309031003110312031303140315031603170318031903200321032203230324032503260327032803290330033103320333033403350336033703380339034003410342034303440345034603470348034903500351035203530Tooltip
: Ø3513 (3304.27-3524.47)
3DMark 11 Performance
23526 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44534 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17714 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7780 points
Help
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
32946 Points ∼100% +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
30456 Points ∼92% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (26292 - 32995, n=9)
29497 Points ∼90% +8%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
28900 Points ∼88% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
27202 Points ∼83%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
25135 Points ∼76% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (513 - 50983, n=721)
14824 Points ∼45% -46%
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
8979 Points ∼100% +17%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
8379 Points ∼93% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (7372 - 8979, n=10)
8179 Points ∼91% +7%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7829 Points ∼87% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7665 Points ∼85%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
7084 Points ∼79% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (368 - 13013, n=257)
6035 Points ∼67% -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK (Turbo)
22967 Points ∼100% +15%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
22326 Points ∼97% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (19655 - 23649, n=9)
21644 Points ∼94% +9%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
21121 Points ∼92% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
19914 Points ∼87%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10980HK
18992 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (385 - 40636, n=642)
12289 Points ∼54% -38%
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Doom Eternal | Red Dead Redemption 2 | Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 | Far Cry 5 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
95.8 fps ∼100% +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (74.3 - 96, n=10)
85 fps ∼89% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
83.4 (67min) fps ∼87% +10%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
79.1 (64min) fps ∼83% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
75.8 (63min) fps ∼79%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
70.5 (55min) fps ∼74% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 115, n=416)
54 fps ∼56% -29%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
181.1 fps ∼100% +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (170 - 181, n=4)
174 fps ∼96% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
173.1 fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 266, n=388)
102 fps ∼56% -41%
Doom Eternal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
165.2 fps ∼100% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (140 - 178, n=8)
156 fps ∼94% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
152.1 fps ∼92%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
147 (94min) fps ∼89% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.9 - 219, n=37)
138 fps ∼84% -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
137 fps ∼83% -10%
Red Dead Redemption 2 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
44.9 fps ∼100%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
43.7 (28min) fps ∼97% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (40.6 - 45, n=5)
43 fps ∼96% -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
42.4 (25min) fps ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.6 - 56.8, n=25)
37.4 fps ∼83% -17%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings AA:T2X Filmic SM
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
107 (72min) fps ∼100% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91.2 - 107, n=4)
96 fps ∼90% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
91.2 fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.3 - 136, n=27)
74.6 fps ∼70% -18%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
102 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (91 - 102, n=3)
98 fps ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (10 - 113, n=58)
73 fps ∼72% -28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
100 (77min) fps ∼100% +12%
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
97 (75min) fps ∼97% +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (89 - 103, n=9)
94.7 fps ∼95% +6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
91 (72min) fps ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q (Turbo)
91 fps ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
89 fps ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (23 - 126, n=109)
75 fps ∼75% -16%
05101520253035404550556065707580859095100Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, 2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0): Ø76.3 (71-79)
Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3 GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø84.4 (72-91)
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø71.1 (67-75)
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H): Ø80.3 (75-84)
GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test
GPU readings during our The Witcher 3 test
low med. high ultraQHD4K
BioShock Infinite (2013) 425.1 349.2 324.2 173.1 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 330.5 237 143.4 75.8 53.5 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 143 115 108 102 77 42 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 103 95 93 89 67 36 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 245.5 136.4 86.5 62.5 39.9 19.6 fps
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 128 93 87 65 49 29 fps
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 172.3 123.6 104.3 91.2 64.7 36.3 fps
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 131.4 99.7 68.3 44.9 36.2 23.5 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 205 168.3 154 152.1 116.7 64 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 210.4 161.2 110.6 89.7 57.9 30.3 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 253 167 149 118 89 51 fps

Noise Level

Idle
33 / 34 / 35 dB(A)
Load
48 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.632.638.230.938.52540.235.340.533.239.23132.432.631.329.931.34034.831.532.335.733.75041.835.834.631.742.46333.228.528.329.135.38028.526.727.425.731.810025.62526.224.726.912528.225.525.824.627.81603227.827.725.831.220031.124.424.322.83125031.522.923.522.132.931530.823.423.521.33240034.224.923.119.53550031.922.9221933.46303423.42217.835.480036.925.424.21837.4100039.326.726.317.940.212503924.923.318.939.9160037.822.420.817.939.1200037.522.220.417.739.4250035.920.519.517.637.3315034.521.619.51836.440003519.518.917.936.6500035.119.2191836.6630032.918.518.517.935.7800028.218.818.61830.21000025.819.218.817.926.91250025.119.81917.8241600022.11918.617.920.1SPL47.934.533.530.449.2N6.22.121.46.8median 32.9median 22.9median 22median 18median 35Delta3.82.42.52.13.6hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
0%
-4%
-5%
2%
5%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.4 (25 - 30.1, n=7)
5%
29 (24 - 32, n=411)
3%
Idle Minimum *
33
30
9%
32
3%
34
-3%
30.4 (26 - 33, n=7)
8%
31.3 (24 - 42, n=834)
5%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
34
-0%
36
-6%
31.7 (27 - 35, n=7)
7%
32.5 (25 - 46.6, n=834)
4%
Idle Maximum *
35
36
-3%
39
-11%
41
-17%
37 (30.1 - 44, n=7)
-6%
34.7 (27 - 57, n=834)
1%
Load Average *
48
50
-4%
53
-10%
48
-0%
46.9 (39.5 - 53, n=7)
2%
41.3 (28 - 59, n=835)
14%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48
-0%
48
-0%
48
-0%
Load Maximum *
49
50
-2%
53
-8%
54
-10%
50.1 (45 - 59.4, n=7)
-2%
48.6 (38.9 - 66.6, n=835)
1%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 34 °C36 °C35 °C 
 43 °C43 °C41 °C 
 42 °C42 °C40 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 39.6 °C
52 °C53 °C47 °C
50 °C51 °C44 °C
43 °C44 °C42 °C
Maximum: 53 °C
Average: 47.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.4 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.8 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 42.7 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.4 °C / 92 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-15.2 °C / -27.4 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
3%
-2%
-2%
-4%
0%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
44
-2%
53
-23%
49
-14%
49.7 (43 - 57, n=7)
-16%
46.1 (28 - 68.8, n=798)
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
53
50
6%
55
-4%
61
-15%
54.6 (50 - 62, n=7)
-3%
49.9 (25.9 - 78, n=796)
6%
Idle Upper Side *
32
29
9%
28
12%
27
16%
30.1 (27.4 - 34, n=7)
6%
30.7 (21.6 - 46.8, n=750)
4%
Idle Bottom *
31
31
-0%
29
6%
29
6%
31.2 (28 - 33, n=7)
-1%
31.8 (21.1 - 50.3, n=748)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.936.32533.241.83129.933.34035.738.35031.740.56329.133.68025.743.410024.752.212524.654.916025.853.820022.853.425022.156.931521.359.840019.5655001964.263017.865.88001867.8100017.971.4125018.972.4160017.976.5200017.773.1250017.671.631501870.3400017.97850001879.3630017.977.580001878.31000017.976.21250017.871.21600017.959.9SPL30.487.1N1.469.2median 18median 70.3Delta2.17.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 2.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 23 / 30 / 39 Watt
Load midlight 156 / 208 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
31%
23%
10%
26%
22%
Idle Minimum *
23
11
52%
13
43%
18
22%
13.5 (10 - 23, n=7)
41%
18.8 (1.9 - 113, n=794)
18%
Idle Average *
30
15
50%
16
47%
21
30%
17.9 (13.1 - 30, n=7)
40%
24.2 (6 - 119, n=794)
19%
Idle Maximum *
39
25
36%
27
31%
38
3%
28.3 (15.8 - 42, n=7)
27%
29.8 (8.3 - 122, n=794)
24%
Load Average *
156
95
39%
109
30%
113
28%
125 (94.8 - 156, n=7)
20%
104 (14.1 - 319, n=786)
33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
152
140
8%
155
-2%
149
2%
Load Maximum *
208
211
-1%
236
-13%
256
-23%
203 (169 - 211, n=7)
2%
177 (21.9 - 590, n=785)
15%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 00min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 44)
3h 05min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 25min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 12min
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 90 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500 PT515-52-70N3
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, 84 Wh		MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
i9-10980HK, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 99.99 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94.2 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
38%
48%
79%
4%
Reader / Idle
480
495
3%
505
5%
518
8%
364 (39 - 1399, n=736)
-24%
H.264
325
277 (88 - 860, n=171)
-15%
WiFi v1.3
185
378
104%
364
97%
364
97%
268 (62 - 683, n=455)
45%
Load
72
78
8%
102
42%
166
131%
79.8 (18 - 243, n=704)
11%

Pros

+ 明亮，高对比度的4K显示屏
+ Pantone验证
+ 良好的色准
+ 高系统性能
+ 超频CPU
+ 金属机身
+ 重量适中
+ 用户可以在G-Sync和Optimus之间选择
+ RAID 0驱动器（2 TB）
+ 出色的Wi-Fi传输速率
+ 配件包括耳机，游戏鼠标，外部网络摄像头，掌托，第二个充电器和笔记本电脑保护套
+ 雷电3

Cons

- 一般般的显示响应时间
- 只有一个RAM插槽
- 没有读卡器
The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, courtesy of Asus Germany
The Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS, courtesy of Asus Germany

借助这款Zephyrus设备及其Screenpad Plus，华硕正努力为目标群体的游戏玩家，主播和内容创作者提供更多价值。通常，Screenpad在很多方面都很有用。但是，这是有代价的：与其他没有辅助显示器的游戏笔记本电脑相比，Zephyrus的重量更大，尺寸也更大。

得益于八核Core i9-10980HK CPU和GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q GPU，该笔记本电脑不缺乏性能。带有32 GB的RAM（在双通道模式下），其中包括一个16 GB的模块和16 GB的板载内存。最高可以升级到48 GB。 RAID 0中的两个NVMe SSD提供高传输速度和大量存储（2 TB）。

所有最新游戏在Asus Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS上均可流畅运行。

带有G-Sync的IPS 4K显示屏具有高亮度，良好的对比度，良好的视角，以及通过Pantone验证的出色色彩。此外，它涵盖了整个AdobeRGB颜色空间。响应时间中等。为了获得更好的响应时间，还提供了可选的300 Hz全高清显示选项。

大量的接口选择特别包括Thunderbolt 3端口。它可用于连接功能丰富的扩展坞或外部GPU。此外，该端口可用于通过随附的第二个AC适配器（65瓦）以降低的性能水平（例如，旅行时）为设备供电。

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS - 07/22/2020 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
80%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
64 / 80 → 80%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Battery
57 / 95 → 60%
Display
93%
Games Performance
94%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
69 / 90 → 77%
Audio
80%
Average
72%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Linked Articles

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS (Zephyrus Duo 15 Series)

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 GX550LXS笔记本电脑评测：一台有着强劲性能的特殊游戏本
Sascha Mölck, 2020-09-28 (Update: 2020-09-28)