Notebookcheck

Oppo Reno3 Pro智能手机评测:四摄中端机

小巧的相机专家。 Oppo Reno3 Pro是一款中端智能手机,配备高分辨率相机和时尚外观。 Oppo是否也可以在西方立足,我们将在评测中仔细研究。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen),
ARM Android Smartphone
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Oppo Reno3 Pro (Reno Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 620
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.50 inch 20.9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, Capacitive, AMOLED, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 235 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: Audioausgabe via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 陀螺仪,接近传感器,指南针
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 025 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 159.4 x 72.4
Battery
4025 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f / 1.7,相位比较自动对焦,OIS,双LED闪光灯,视频@ 2160p / 30fps(相机1); 13.0MP,f / 2.4,长焦镜头(相机2); 8.0MP,f / 2.2,广角镜头(3号相机); 2.0MP,f / 2.4,单色,景深(4号相机)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f / 2.4,视频@ 1080p / 30fps
Additional features
Speakers: 混合立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟, USB电缆,耳机,硅胶套,SIM卡工具, 24 Months Warranty, SAR值:0.825W / kg(头),1.292W / kg(机体), fanless
Weight
171 g, Power Supply: 89 g
Price
529 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Bewertung
Rating Version
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
84 %7
08/2020
Oppo Reno3 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
84 %7
03/2020
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
SD 730G, Adreno 618
208 g256 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.47"2340x1080
82 %7
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
84 %7
01/2020
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

Size comparison

163.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.7 mm 199 g157.8 mm 74.2 mm 9.7 mm 208 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g159.4 mm 72.4 mm 7.7 mm 171 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno3 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
639 (556min - 658max) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
623 (611min - 633max) MBit/s ∼97% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
370 (342min - 372max) MBit/s ∼58% -42%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
329 (284min - 350max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
642 (549min - 664max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
634 (526min - 657max) MBit/s ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
415 (295min - 452max) MBit/s ∼65% -35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
313 (306min - 319max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø639 (556-658)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø634 (526-657)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker
24.8 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
34.6 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
25 ∆E
26.1 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
22 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
40.6 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno3 Pro: 32.31 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 48.47 ∆E
ColorChecker
4.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3 ∆E
2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Reno3 Pro: 5.3 ∆E min: 1.99 - max: 8.54 ∆E
556
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
549
cd/m²
601
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
600
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 603 cd/m² Average: 573.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 601 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.276
Oppo Reno3 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.47
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Response Times
-107%
-18%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
8 (3, 5)
8 (3, 5)
-0%
10 (5, 5)
-25%
8 (3, 5)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
6 (3, 3)
24 (19, 5)
-300%
6 (3, 3)
-0%
6 (3, 3)
-0%
PWM Frequency
328.9
255
-22%
229.4
-30%
337.8
3%
Screen
4%
-21%
6%
Brightness middle
601
579
-4%
510
-15%
774
29%
Brightness
574
576
0%
536
-7%
778
36%
Brightness Distribution
91
89
-2%
91
0%
95
4%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.84
4.61
5%
6.6
-36%
5.28
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
8.26
7.72
7%
17.56
-113%
8.55
-4%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.2
4.2
19%
2.9
44%
6.2
-19%
Gamma
2.276 97%
2.244 98%
2.242 98%
2.292 96%
CCT
7164 91%
7201 90%
6989 93%
7319 89%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-52% / -33%
-20% / -20%
4% / 4%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 328.9 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 328.9 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 328.9 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9589 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1799 Points ∼91%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1676 Points ∼85% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=14)
1757 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 4160, n=147)
1969 Points ∼100% +9%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
606 Points ∼100%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
595 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=14)
599 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1604, n=147)
570 Points ∼94% -6%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8573 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
7551 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼68% -32%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7896 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=14)
8274 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=546)
6044 Points ∼71% -29%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9647 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
9240 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼68% -32%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9454 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 10876, n=14)
9640 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=702)
6649 Points ∼69% -31%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3381 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼92% -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3304 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=14)
3248 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=553)
2266 Points ∼67% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3531 Points ∼73%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2492 Points ∼52% -29%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼100% +36%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3448 Points ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=14)
3448 Points ∼72% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 12146, n=553)
2259 Points ∼47% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3497 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2567 Points ∼60% -27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3415 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=14)
3381 Points ∼79% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 9643, n=554)
2088 Points ∼49% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3440 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3155 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼92% -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3337 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=14)
3232 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=585)
2181 Points ∼63% -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5223 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3648 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼76% -24%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5070 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=14)
5144 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 22052, n=585)
3079 Points ∼59% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4684 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3522 Points ∼75% -25%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4545 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=14)
4512 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 11895, n=585)
2534 Points ∼54% -46%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3324 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3202 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼92% -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3233 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=14)
3324 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5262, n=633)
2140 Points ∼64% -36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3251 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2245 Points ∼51% -31%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼100% +36%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3174 Points ∼72% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=14)
3109 Points ∼70% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 11573, n=633)
1883 Points ∼43% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3267 Points ∼81%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
2405 Points ∼60% -26%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼100% +23%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3187 Points ∼79% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=14)
3133 Points ∼78% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 9138, n=634)
1785 Points ∼44% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3357 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3228 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼92% -8%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3224 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=14)
3200 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=675)
2011 Points ∼60% -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4976 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3485 Points ∼62% -30%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼100% +12%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4834 Points ∼87% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=14)
4825 Points ∼86% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 16670, n=674)
2496 Points ∼45% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4494 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
3424 Points ∼72% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +5%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4351 Points ∼92% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=14)
4256 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 11256, n=677)
2133 Points ∼45% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
20054 Points ∼97%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19888 Points ∼97% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=14)
20608 Points ∼100% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 59268, n=819)
15813 Points ∼77% -21%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
66415 Points ∼99%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
66655 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 69645, n=14)
67110 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 224130, n=817)
28447 Points ∼42% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
43875 Points ∼99%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43778 Points ∼99% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=14)
44131 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=817)
21865 Points ∼50% -50%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
10 fps ∼59% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +31%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 13, n=14)
12 fps ∼71% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=345)
11.7 fps ∼69% -10%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.3 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
6.7 fps ∼61% -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +33%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps ∼78% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=14)
8.37 fps ∼76% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=343)
8.25 fps ∼75% -1%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼75%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
16 fps ∼57% -24%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +33%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
20 fps ∼71% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 21, n=14)
19.8 fps ∼71% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=349)
17.4 fps ∼62% -17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
23 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 8192
18 fps ∼58% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps ∼77% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 24, n=14)
22.1 fps ∼71% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=348)
20.1 fps ∼65% -13%
Oppo Reno3 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10 ProSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteOppo Reno3 Pro 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
-24%
1%
-13%
-67%
Random Write 4KB
146.7
108.5
-26%
142
-3%
145
-1%
123 (22.1 - 172, n=14)
-16%
38.6 (0.14 - 319, n=913)
-74%
Random Read 4KB
153.1
119.2
-22%
132
-14%
159.1
4%
160 (127 - 208, n=14)
5%
61.7 (1.59 - 325, n=913)
-60%
Sequential Write 256KB
471.6
205.1
-57%
190.8
-60%
476.3
1%
330 (209 - 474, n=14)
-30%
135 (2.99 - 1321, n=913)
-71%
Sequential Read 256KB
966.5
499.2
-48%
776.7
-20%
960.5
-1%
854 (687 - 967, n=14)
-12%
355 (12.1 - 2037, n=913)
-63%
Max. Load
 42.6 °C41.2 °C39.4 °C 
 43.6 °C41.3 °C38.6 °C 
 43.2 °C40.9 °C38.9 °C 
Maximum: 43.6 °C
Average: 41.1 °C
37.6 °C39.4 °C39.9 °C
37.2 °C40.1 °C41.9 °C
37.1 °C41 °C40.5 °C
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.8 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.842.3254141.23133.232.24033.436.85036.139.86329.431.68027.528.910025.726.812521.229.516020.438.920019.244.625018.246.331517.654.24001761.450017.765.463018.268.280016.769.810001773.9125015.27916001675.9200015.375.3250015.775315015.371.4400015.871.8500016.265.563001662.9800016.162.81000016.765.21250016.560.71600016.753.4SPL59.828.585.1N12.41.157median 16.7median 65.2Delta110.445.841.541.436.931.231.43635.635.635.331332627.723.723.321.726.619.137.118.243.317.149.415.655.515.359.116.161.8146313.666.41471.613.674.614.872.714.472.214.666.613.763.813.865.414.16814.369.814.670.21564.715.37015.757.365.526.681.718.50.849.8median 14.8median 64.71.79.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Reno3 ProXiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Reno3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Pro
5260 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro 5G
4025 mAh
Average of class Smartphone
 
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing 1.3
893
1112
25%
904
1%
876
-2%
705 (223 - 2636, n=780)
-21%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
14h 53min

Pros

+ 90 Hz屏幕
+ 纤薄的机身
+ 相机质量好
+ 快速WLAN
+ 内存大

Cons

- 没有5G
- 没有eSIM
- 没有microSD插槽
- 前置摄像头应提供更多细节

总结——配置高:

Oppo Reno3 Pro智能手机评测.
Oppo Reno3 Pro智能手机评测.

Oppo Reno3 Pro的4G版本也是一个不错的选择,尤其是它比5G版本提供更多的内存,但价格相似。 凭借90 Hz的显示屏,时尚的外壳,纤细的机身,合理的续航和出色的相机,我们绝对可以推荐这款中端设备。

那些重视高端功能(如极限性能,WiFi 6、60 Hz的4K视频或eSIM)的人将不得不在较高的价格范围内重新寻找,而对中端功能满意的人则可以节省几百欧元,并且仍然可以获得功能强大的设备。

Oppo Reno3 Pro是功能强大且配置齐全的中端设备。

很难确定真正缺点,充其量,ColorOS偶尔偶尔有些不好用或仍然有未翻译的界面,不过很少引起注意。

Oppo Reno3 Pro - 06/10/2020 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
95%
Connectivity
45 / 70 → 64%
Weight
91%
Battery
91%
Display
84%
Games Performance
39 / 64 → 60%
Application Performance
80 / 86 → 92%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 84%
Camera
70%
Average
77%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Oppo Reno3 Pro智能手机评测:四摄中端机
Florian Schmitt, 2020-08- 3 (Update: 2020-08- 3)