Nomu S30 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 423 cd/m²
Contrast: 1627:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 7.8 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 9.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.32
CCT: 9828 K
| Nomu S30 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1" | Archos 50 Saphir IPS, 1280x720, 5" | UMI Plus LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 IPS, 800x480, 4.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 34% | -38% | 19% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 423 | 350 -17% | 545 29% | 432.8 2% | 452 7% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 421 | 351 -17% | 527 25% | 430 2% | 436 4% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 98 5% | 87 -6% | 86 -8% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.58 -123% | 0.232 11% | 0.53 -104% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1627 | 940 -42% | 1866 15% | 853 -48% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.8 | 2.04 74% | 12.5 -60% | 4.93 37% | 5.71 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.5 | 3.25 78% | 24.4 -68% | 8.34 42% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 9.8 | 1.63 83% | 15.4 -57% | 5.18 47% | 5.02 49% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.07 106% | 1.87 118% | 2.4 92% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 9828 66% | 6391 102% | 12705 51% | 7461 87% | 7441 87% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 86.86 | ||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 99.35 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8163 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Nomu S30 | |
| Archos 50 Saphir | |
| UMI Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.3 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Nomu S30 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 11.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Archos 50 Saphir audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
UMI Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 12.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (42.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.01 / 0.46 Watt |
| Idle |  0.93 / 2.31 / 2.35 Watt |
| Load |
4.57 / 6.1 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Nomu S30 5000 mAh | Archos 50 Saphir 5000 mAh | UMI Plus 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | -61% | 42% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.93 | 0.65 30% | 2.6 -180% | 0.6 35% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 2.31 | 1.9 18% | 3.2 -39% | 1.2 48% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 2.35 | 2.05 13% | 3.3 -40% | 1.3 45% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 4.57 | 6.14 -34% | 7.7 -68% | 2.6 43% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 6.1 | 6.54 -7% | 4.8 21% | 3.6 41% |
* ... smaller is better
| Nomu S30 5000 mAh | Archos 50 Saphir 5000 mAh | UMI Plus 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Xcover 3 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 17% | -32% | -40% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 13.9 | 16.2 17% | 9.4 -32% | 8.4 -40% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 22 | 16.7 | ||
| Load (h) | 4.9 | 2.8 | ||
| H.264 (h) | 11.3 |
Pros
Cons
来自Nomu的户外智能手机面向那些除了日常使用还希望可以带着手机进行户外旅行而不用担心它会轻易损伤的用户。它得到了IP68认证，采用Gorilla Glass 4屏幕玻璃，接口也均有保护盖。另外Nomu还为S30提供了不错的技术参数，包括LTE支持，胜过其他户外设备的强劲处理器。尽管它的性能在同类设备中鹤立鸡群，但电池续航也不会让用户失望。
表现远胜同类设备，但并不适合所有用户！
与这些成功特性形成鲜明对比的是它较为脆弱的屏幕边角设计，这会限制设备正面的坚固度。它的多媒体用途也十分有限，因为这台设备不仅沉重还十分笨拙，手小的用户将很难用它玩游戏。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Nomu S30
- 04/04/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Gärtner
Price comparison
