Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Specifications

Primary Camera: 16 MPix , f / 1.7,相位检测自动对焦,OIS,双LED闪光灯,视频最高可达2160p / 30 FPS。 主摄像头:5.0 MP,f / 2.2,景深(辅助摄像头)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , 12.0 MPix,视频,最高1080p / 30 FPS
Price comparison
Average of 40 scores (from 67 reviews)
Reviews for the Motorola Moto G7 Plus
您并不总是需要花费5000多元来购买可拍出好照片的智能手机。 这就是摩托罗拉对Moto G7 Plus的定义,其售价约为300欧元(约合2300元)。 G7 Plus拥有光学稳定的1600万像素摄像头和智能软件功能。
Source: DxOMark
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith its large LCD screen, high-end glass finish, and dual-cam photography setup at a fraction of the cost of many flagship smartphones, the Motorola Moto G7 Plus will be of interest to the budget-conscious consumer. Image quality is a little off of what we’ve come to expect from top-performing devices, however, especially in video mode. For stills, limited dynamic range, undersaturated color, and artifacts are the main problems which had a significant impact on the Motorola device’s overall score and ranking. There are a couple of positives, with the G7 Plus capturing high levels of detail, as well as nice images when using flash, and the autofocus is fast and accurate in most circumstances.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2019
Source: Good Gear Guide
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionFor most people, the Moto G7 Plus will do a fine job of handling your day-to-day demands. For those who need it to push a little further, it’ll do that too.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Ausdroid
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G7 Plus if the flagship of the midrange. I know that might be an oxymoron but I think the Moto G7 Plus has set the benchmark for devices at and around the $500 price point. For some, it may be a little more than they wanted to spend and for others maybe even a little less then they may be willing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: What Mobile
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionPixelation becomes very apparent after not too much zoom, although the timelapse feature works fantastically well. The typical Android three-button setup at the bottom of the screen can also be changed to a nifty one-button setup that switches between apps and can summon Google Assistant if held down. Overall, the G7 Plus is highly impressive for its price bracket, at a crucial time for Motorola given the competition. It even has a headphone jack!
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: T3
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionMotorola (or rather Lenovo) has done it again: the G7 Plus continues the G series tradition of offering some very decent specs and features at a very low price. If you don't want to go above £300 for your next smartphone buy, then the Moto G7 Plus is an excellent choice.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/12/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G7 Plus is a great phone and a solid choice with change to spare from £300. You're unlikely to be disappointed if you go this way.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith an improved camera, design and hardware the Moto G7 Plus is one of the best sub-£300 smartphones available. It may not be a giant leap forward, but it is easy to recommend to buyers on a budget. But if you only have very basic needs then the Moto G7 Power could be a better, even more affordable, option.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionTalk about evolution: the Moto G7 Plus is Motorola at the top of its game, delivering true on an affordable, well-designed and capable handset with very little to complain about. Excess auto-brightness and strong competition from Honor are its main issues in a handset that, otherwise, is easily recommendable as one of the best affordable devices on the market.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/21/2019
Source: Phone Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionOverall, Moto is not doing anything extraordinary, but it does not need to: the new Moto phones are an evolution in terms of design with thinner bezels and more stylish looks, they are faster with the Snapdragon 6xx series of chips, and they work reliably, with a clean and likeable interface.
Comparison, online available, Length Unknown, Date: 02/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 88%
Source: Stuff TV
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionMoto has listened to some of last year’s snagging points and improved on them. That doesn’t mean there’s probably enough here to tempt G6 Plus owners to upgrade, but for anyone else looking for an affordable handset that shrugs off the majority of budget expectations, the Moto G7 Plus is a very safe bet indeed.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: GSM Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionInstead of cramming everything in a single package like the first Moto Gs, Motorola has now taken a more diversified approach by launching four models for the masses each offering something the others don't. It's up to you to pick the right one for you.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phone Arena
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionNous avons toujours salué le travail de Motorola avec sa gamme G, et les consommateurs ont toujours répondu présents. Avec le G7 Plus, le constructeur propose à n'en pas douter le modèle le plus complet de l'histoire de la gamme. Élégant, original, performant, endurant et surtout doté d'un excellent appareil photo, le Moto G7 Plus atteint presque l'équilibre parfait. Le bilan est légèrement terni par la qualité moyenne des photos de nuit et des selfies, ainsi que par un écran manquant de contraste et de luminosité. Mais ce sont des petits défauts que l'on pardonne volontiers, surtout pour ce prix. Le Moto G7 Plus est proposé à 329 euros. À ce tarif, il est l'une des meilleures propositions sur le marché du milieu de gamme.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G7 Plus’ price point puts it at the top end of the affordable market. But from what I’ve seen so far, the increased investment will be worth it for anyone who regularly takes photos on their phone on nights out thanks to the inclusion of an upgraded main sensor and OIS.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G7 Plus is a lovely looking device that is far beyond the expectations of its price point in terms of finish.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: Android User
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/12/2019
Source: Area DVD
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2019
Source: Tech Stage
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/07/2019
Source: Mobile Geeks
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 90% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: WinFuture
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/28/2019
Source: Chinahandys.net
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/10/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 81% performance: 83% features: 73% display: 83% mobility: 78%
Source: Netzwelt
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 73% features: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerbase
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2019
Source: Spiegel Online
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Long, Date: 02/16/2019
Source: WinFuture
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/13/2019
Source: Curved
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 77% display: 85% mobility: 81%
Source: Inside Handy
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Android Pit
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: c't - 6/19

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/01/2019
Source: Andro 4 All
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Computerhoy
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 77% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hipertextual
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 02/20/2019
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/16/2019
Source: Movil Zona
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/15/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Xataka
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/14/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 78% display: 85% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Source: Xataka
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Techzilla.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/28/2019
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 77% display: 75% mobility: 75% workmanship: 75%
Source: Leonardo.it Tech
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/22/2019
Source: Everyeye.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: HDblog.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/11/2019
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/22/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 75% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Tutto Android
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% features: 82% display: 84% mobility: 88% ergonomy: 70%
Source: HDblog.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/12/2019
Source: AndroidPit.it
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: Computer Totaal
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/06/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: XGN
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/17/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/08/2019
Source: Meilleurmobile
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Frandroid
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org version
 FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Source: Komputerswiat
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/02/2019
Source: Tabletowo
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/25/2019
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: Antyweb
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org version
 PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/08/2019
Source: DGL.ru
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org version
 RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2019
Source: FPT shop
 VN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 VN→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/19/2019
Source: Tek.no
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org version
 NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Alt om Data
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Lyd og Billede
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/09/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil DK
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 78% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2019
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Mobil.se
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: M3 PC för alla
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Playtech.ro
 →zh-CN Archive.org version
 →zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Computerblog.ro
 →zh-CN Archive.org version
 →zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/07/2019
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 509:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 636:
中档八核SoC,具有8个高达1.8 GHz的Kryo 260 CPU内核,Adreno 509 GPU,LPDDR4-2666内存控制器和X12 LTE(Cat 13 / 12,300 / 150 MBit)调制解调器。采用现代14nm工艺制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.