Notebookcheck

摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus智能手机评测

Stefan Schomberg, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Zewei Shen), 04/15/2019
Android Smartphone Phablet

竞争激烈。 您并不总是需要花费5000多元来购买可拍出好照片的智能手机。 这就是摩托罗拉对Moto G7 Plus的定义,其售价约为300欧元(约合2300元)。 G7 Plus拥有光学稳定的1600万像素摄像头和智能软件功能。

Motorola Moto G7 Plus (Moto G7 Series)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 509
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.2 inch 19:9, 2270 x 1080 pixel 403 PPI, 多点电容触控屏, IPS, glossy: yes
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 47.4 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: 最多512 GB microSD卡, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 加速度计,陀螺仪,接近传感器,, USB 3.0 Type-C端口,OTG和 快充(PD)
Networking
Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B4, B5, B8, B19. 4G: B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B18, B19, B20, B26, B28, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 157 x 75.3
Battery
11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Camera
Webcam: 12MP, 1.25μm,LED闪光灯
Primary Camera: 16 MPix , f / 1.7,相位检测自动对焦,OIS,双LED闪光灯,视频最高可达2160p / 30 FPS。 主摄像头:5.0 MP,f / 2.2,景深(辅助摄像头)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix , 12.0 MPix,视频,最高1080p / 30 FPS
Additional features
Speakers: 底部扬声器, Keyboard: 虚拟键盘, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, LTE Cat 13/5 – 400 Mbps/75 Mbps. SAR values: Head - 0.788 W/kg. ExFAT support. DRM Widevine L1 certification, fanless
Weight
176 g, Power Supply: 88 g
Price
2300元 ~ 299.99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Motorola Moto G7 Plus

Size Comparison

160.4 mm 76.6 mm 7.8 mm 175 g160 mm 75.5 mm 8 mm 167 g159.8 mm 76.8 mm 7.5 mm 168 g158.5 mm 75.4 mm 8.3 mm 175 g157 mm 75.3 mm 8.3 mm 176 g
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
332 (min: 314, max: 341) MBit/s ∼100%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
330 (min: 63, max: 342) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
310 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
279 (min: 265, max: 284) MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=381)
221 MBit/s ∼67% -33%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
207 (min: 162, max: 243) MBit/s ∼62% -38%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Mali-G71 MP2, 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash
320 (min: 164, max: 362) MBit/s ∼100% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Adreno 508, 630, 64 GB eMMC Flash
311 MBit/s ∼97% +8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
288 (min: 138, max: 294) MBit/s ∼90%
HTC U12 Life
Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash
259 (min: 252, max: 263) MBit/s ∼81% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=381)
212 MBit/s ∼66% -26%
Honor 8X
Mali-G51 MP4, Kirin 710, 128 GB eMMC Flash
182 (min: 136, max: 231) MBit/s ∼57% -37%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø331 (314-341)
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (314-342)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (265-284)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø207 (162-243)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø288 (268-294)
HTC U12 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Qualcomm Adreno 509; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø259 (252-263)
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, ARM Mali-G71 MP2; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø320 (164-362)
Honor 8X HiSilicon Kirin 710, ARM Mali-G51 MP4; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø182 (136-231)
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Overview
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Loop
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Garmin Edge 520 - Bridge
GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Overview
GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Overview
GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Loop
GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus - Loop
GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus – Bridge
GPS test: Motorola Moto G7 Plus – Bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
ColorChecker Passport: The lower half of each area of colour displays the reference colour
A photo of our test chart
A photo of our test chart
Our test chart in detail
Our test chart in detail
536
cd/m²
573
cd/m²
527
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
537
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
533
cd/m²
515
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 573 cd/m² Average: 525 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 537 cd/m²
Contrast: 926:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.4-29.43 Ø6.1
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.64-98 Ø6.3
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.099
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2
HTC U12 Life
IPS, 2160x1080, 6
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6
Honor 8X
LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9
Screen
-5%
42%
-5%
34%
Brightness middle
537
468
-13%
570
6%
484
-10%
761
42%
Brightness
525
452
-14%
565
8%
469
-11%
723
38%
Brightness Distribution
85
90
6%
93
9%
93
9%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.58
0.62
-7%
0.55
5%
0.69
-19%
Contrast
926
755
-18%
880
-5%
1103
19%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.41
6.09
5%
1.5
77%
7.3
-14%
2.4
63%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.86
10.23
6%
3.6
67%
11.1
-2%
5.2
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.7
6.8
-1%
1.2
82%
7.4
-10%
1.8
73%
Gamma
2.099 105%
2.708 81%
2.07 106%
2.16 102%
2.21 100%
CCT
8310 78%
6972 93%
6504 100%
8534 76%
6312 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2315 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 2315 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 2315 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9643 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (25.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (40.6 ms).
Geekbench 4.3
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4287 Points ∼95%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4465 Points ∼99% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4026 Points ∼89% -6%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4083 Points ∼90% -5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
3763 Points ∼83% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4278 - 5041, n=11)
4505 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (663 - 21070, n=285)
4518 Points ∼100% +5%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4992 Points ∼90%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
4914 Points ∼88% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
4429 Points ∼80% -11%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5557 Points ∼100% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4011 Points ∼72% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4781 - 5426, n=11)
4960 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1174 - 11598, n=339)
4432 Points ∼80% -11%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1337 Points ∼83%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
1338 Points ∼83% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
1525 Points ∼94% +14%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1614 Points ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
822 Points ∼51% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (1323 - 1506, n=11)
1351 Points ∼84% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (437 - 4824, n=340)
1314 Points ∼81% -2%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6277 Points ∼88%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5730 Points ∼80% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5387 Points ∼75% -14%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7141 Points ∼100% +14%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
4875 Points ∼68% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5611 - 6277, n=11)
5291 Points ∼74% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3227 - 9974, n=334)
4867 Points ∼68% -22%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
7618 Points ∼85%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6412 Points ∼72% -16%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
5625 Points ∼63% -26%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8939 Points ∼100% +17%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5712 Points ∼64% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6040 - 7618, n=10)
6617 Points ∼74% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4290 - 13531, n=502)
5304 Points ∼59% -30%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15766 Points ∼90%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16924 Points ∼97% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
13914 Points ∼80% -12%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
17450 Points ∼100% +11%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
12845 Points ∼74% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (0 - 19365, n=11)
15577 Points ∼89% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8253 - 45072, n=618)
13405 Points ∼77% -15%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20953 Points ∼97%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
20778 Points ∼96% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15567 Points ∼72% -26%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21533 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
18449 Points ∼86% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (0 - 20953, n=11)
18924 Points ∼88% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3585 - 162695, n=618)
19338 Points ∼90% -8%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19525 Points ∼95%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
19777 Points ∼97% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
15167 Points ∼74% -22%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
20468 Points ∼100% +5%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
16818 Points ∼82% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (0 - 20404, n=11)
18061 Points ∼88% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4164 - 83518, n=619)
16165 Points ∼79% -17%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼92%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
36 fps ∼92% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
39 fps ∼100% +8%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
30 fps ∼77% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (35 - 36, n=11)
35.6 fps ∼91% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 251, n=644)
33.7 fps ∼86% -6%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼97%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
35 fps ∼97% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
28 fps ∼78% -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (30 - 40, n=11)
34.5 fps ∼96% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.8 - 120, n=647)
26.3 fps ∼73% -25%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼76%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
16 fps ∼76% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
21 fps ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
14 fps ∼67% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (16 - 16, n=11)
16 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.7 - 132, n=563)
18.4 fps ∼88% +15%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼79%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
15 fps ∼79% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
13 fps ∼68% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (13 - 18, n=11)
15 fps ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.4 - 115, n=568)
17.1 fps ∼90% +14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼65%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
10 fps ∼65% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14 fps ∼92% +40%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.8 fps ∼64% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (9.8 - 10, n=11)
9.98 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 88, n=425)
15.3 fps ∼100% +53%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼67%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
9.8 fps ∼67% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼88% +33%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
9.4 fps ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (8.4 - 12, n=11)
9.81 fps ∼67% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 110, n=428)
14.7 fps ∼100% +50%
GFXBench
High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2 fps ∼23%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
3.6 fps ∼41% +80%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.1 fps ∼47% +105%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2 - 4.4, n=8)
3.39 fps ∼38% +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.86 - 59, n=129)
8.81 fps ∼100% +341%
2560x1440 High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.3 fps ∼38%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
2.2 fps ∼36% -4%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.6 fps ∼43% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (2.2 - 2.3, n=8)
2.21 fps ∼36% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 31, n=129)
6.09 fps ∼100% +165%
Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.6 fps ∼43%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.7 fps ∼44% +2%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
5.2 fps ∼40% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (4.9 - 6.9, n=8)
5.61 fps ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 59, n=130)
13.1 fps ∼100% +134%
1920x1080 Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
5.4 fps ∼37%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼41% +11%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.6 fps ∼32% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.4 - 6.1, n=8)
5.93 fps ∼41% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 63, n=129)
14.6 fps ∼100% +170%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼61%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6.3 fps ∼61% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼74% +21%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.6 fps ∼54% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (6.3 - 6.3, n=11)
6.3 fps ∼61% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 54, n=354)
10.3 fps ∼100% +63%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼64%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
6 fps ∼64% 0%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.4 fps ∼69% +7%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
5.3 fps ∼57% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (5.1 - 7.4, n=11)
6.01 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.6 - 58, n=358)
9.31 fps ∼100% +55%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
117557 Points ∼84%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
116595 Points ∼83% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
122826 Points ∼88% +4%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
140188 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
90347 Points ∼64% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (115565 - 138661, n=11)
118863 Points ∼85% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0 - 374820, n=246)
125764 Points ∼90% +7%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
92015 Points ∼82%
HTC U12 Life
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096
95287 Points ∼84% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096
87728 Points ∼78% -5%
Honor 8X
HiSilicon Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
112870 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Adreno 508, 4096
71635 Points ∼63% -22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  (92015 - 125213, n=10)
98051 Points ∼87% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (23275 - 274007, n=449)
82754 Points ∼73% -10%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (17.6 - 23832, n=482)
87.2 Points ∼100% +90%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
47.986 Points ∼55% +5%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
47.012 Points ∼54% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
45.778 Points ∼52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (44.2 - 51.5, n=10)
45.4 Points ∼52% -1%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
44.314 Points ∼51% -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
9165 Points ∼100% +10%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
9121 Points ∼100% +9%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
9095 Points ∼99% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (8163 - 9746, n=11)
8657 Points ∼94% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
8368 Points ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone (3126 - 43280, n=636)
6020 Points ∼66% -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (603 - 59466, n=655)
10996 ms * ∼100% -130%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
4776 ms * ∼43%
HTC U12 Life (Chrome 70)
4757.5 ms * ∼43% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (4105 - 4820, n=11)
4653 ms * ∼42% +3%
Honor 8X
4247.7 ms * ∼39% +11%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
4122.8 ms * ∼37% +14%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 161, n=109)
63.3 Points ∼100% +17%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
58 Points ∼92% +7%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
57 Points ∼90% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (54 - 61, n=8)
55.5 Points ∼88% +3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
54 Points ∼85%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall Score
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)
168 Points ∼100% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 (147 - 184, n=8)
158 Points ∼94% +1%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
156 Points ∼93%
Honor 8X (Chrome 70)
147 Points ∼88% -6%
Average of class Smartphone (106 - 362, n=322)
119 Points ∼71% -24%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Moto G7 PlusHTC U12 LifeSamsung Galaxy A7 2018 Honor 8XMotorola Moto G6 PlusAverage 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-19%
-20%
-12%
-5%
-23%
-38%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
60.87 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
64.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
68.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
10%
62.13 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
55.9 (58.4 - 74.7, n=95)
-10%
47.9 (9.5 - 87.1, n=382)
-23%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
82.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
82.35 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
78.15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-6%
75.24 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-9%
83.65 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
74 (76.1 - 87.2, n=95)
-11%
66 (8.1 - 96.5, n=382)
-20%
Random Write 4KB
73.1
16.2
-78%
15.45
-79%
59.87
-18%
62.76
-14%
24 (3.4 - 88.2, n=106)
-67%
18.9 (0.14 - 250, n=686)
-74%
Random Read 4KB
76.6
56.71
-26%
83.98
10%
49.54
-35%
58.39
-24%
53.9 (11.4 - 149, n=106)
-30%
43.1 (1.59 - 174, n=686)
-44%
Sequential Write 256KB
208.7
209.45
0%
104.87
-50%
169.98
-19%
216.09
4%
171 (40 - 246, n=106)
-18%
89.1 (2.99 - 388, n=686)
-57%
Sequential Read 256KB
283.6
272.79
-4%
295.76
4%
283.87
0%
286.64
1%
273 (115 - 704, n=106)
-4%
251 (12.1 - 1468, n=686)
-11%
Game Compare - Asphalt 9: Legends
0102030405060Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; High Quality; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26.8 (3-60)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Standard / low; 1.3.1a: Ø26 (3-60)
Game Compare - Shadow Fight 3
0102030405060Tooltip
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 1.16.1: Ø47.1 (1-60)
Max. Load
 32 °C33 °C34 °C 
 32 °C32.6 °C34.6 °C 
 32.2 °C32.5 °C34.1 °C 
Maximum: 34.6 °C
Average: 33 °C
31.6 °C33.3 °C33 °C
31.6 °C33 °C33.4 °C
32.2 °C32.6 °C32.2 °C
Maximum: 33.4 °C
Average: 32.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.434.72530.432.3312732.34033.1295034.631.56329.126.9802423.910023.621.712521.231.416021.140.620018.841.125018.747.231517.650.140016.657.150015.861.763015.864.580015.369.6100016.370.8125014.771.316001668.620001570.7250014.768.7315014.769.4400014.372.9500014.868.9630015.162800015.257.91000014.456.81250014.462.71600014.462.8SPL6063.75527.580.9N12.915.59.30.947median 15.3median 62.7Delta1.39.930.740.32531.926.828.326.333.629.840.927.425.12125.419.527.518.825.519.237.617.642.116.94415.852.81555.91559.614.764.114.86714.670.314.36913.469.614.469.914.471.814.876.2158014.869.814.766.5157014.968.115.25315.741.126.884.80.956.5median 15median 66.51.210.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G7 PlusHonor 8X
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G7 Plus audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Honor 8X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 13% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.1 / 1.7 / 2.1 Watt
Load midlight 5.1 / 7.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
9%
17%
1%
27%
-5%
14%
Idle Minimum *
1.1
0.7
36%
0.71
35%
0.92
16%
0.5
55%
0.965 (0.6 - 1.75, n=11)
12%
0.883 (0.2 - 3.4, n=714)
20%
Idle Average *
1.7
1.5
12%
1.36
20%
2.3
-35%
1.78
-5%
2.21 (1.4 - 4.48, n=11)
-30%
1.735 (0.6 - 6.2, n=713)
-2%
Idle Maximum *
2.1
2.5
-19%
1.47
30%
2.32
-10%
1.81
14%
2.57 (2 - 4.5, n=11)
-22%
2.02 (0.74 - 6.6, n=714)
4%
Load Average *
5.1
4.7
8%
5.13
-1%
4.37
14%
3.3
35%
4.56 (3.65 - 7.92, n=11)
11%
4.06 (0.8 - 10.8, n=708)
20%
Load Maximum *
7.9
7.4
6%
7.89
-0%
6.13
22%
5.14
35%
7.41 (5.1 - 13.6, n=11)
6%
5.85 (1.2 - 14.2, n=708)
26%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 16min
Motorola Moto G7 Plus
3000 mAh
HTC U12 Life
3600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018
3300 mAh
Honor 8X
3750 mAh
Motorola Moto G6 Plus
3200 mAh
Battery Runtime
-16%
9%
19%
24%
Reader / Idle
1467
1846
H.264
809
836
3%
542
-33%
WiFi v1.3
715
603
-16%
605
-15%
852
19%
702
-2%
Load
196
273
39%
404
106%

Pros

+ 相机不错
+ 4K视频录制
+ 高清串流
+ WiFi速度快
+ SoC没有降频
+ 机身质感一流
+ 性价比超高

Cons

- 触摸屏很空洞
- 屏幕偏蓝
- GPU性能一般
摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.
摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus智能手机评测. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany.

摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus是一款出色的设备,重新定义了中端智能手机应有的水平。售价不到300欧元(约合2300元),摩托罗拉就已经推出了一款不错的智能手机,它拥有出色的相机,漂亮的屏幕和几乎所有属于现代旗舰的功能。 G7 Plus采用现代设计,外观时尚。

摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus是一款出色的智能手机,可以让人们三思而后行,是否应该购买昂贵的旗舰产品。它就是有那么好。

不幸的是,G7 Plus有其缺点。触摸屏听起来相当空洞,虽然这可能只是我们测评设备的一个问题。 GPU的功能也不足,摩托罗拉似乎为该设备配备了比其前代产品更低质量的屏幕。同样,我们希望看到更大的电池,但附带的充电器可以在一小时内充满电。简而言之,摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus是一款出色的智能手机,价格实惠,是现代昂贵的旗舰产品的绝佳替代品。

请注意:我们将在评定电池续航时间后公布最终评级。

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Moto G7 Plus智能手机评测
Stefan Schomberg, 2019-04-15 (Update: 2019-04-15)