联想 Moto E3 智能手机简短评测
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Blackview R6 | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| OnePlus 3T | |
| Lenovo P2 | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Blackview R6 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 436 cd/m²
Contrast: 1063:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 2.13
CCT: 8318 K
| Lenovo Moto E3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Huawei Y5 II IPS, 1280x720, 5" | TP-Link Neffos C5 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | Wiko Lenny 3 IPS, 1280x720, 5" | LG K7 IPS, 854x480, 5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -33% | -11% | -13% | -50% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 436 | 465 7% | 508 17% | 374 -14% | 308 -29% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 420 | 443 5% | 491 17% | 343 -18% | 300 -29% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 90 -1% | 89 -2% | 85 -7% | 93 2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.41 | 0.84 -105% | 0.58 -41% | 0.47 -15% | 0.26 37% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1063 | 554 -48% | 876 -18% | 796 -25% | 1185 11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 7.8 -44% | 7 -30% | 6 -11% | 12 -122% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10 | 15.7 -57% | 14.1 -41% | 11.9 -19% | 25.3 -153% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7 | 8.4 -20% | 6.1 13% | 6.7 4% | 15.3 -119% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.07 106% | 2.15 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 8318 78% | 8438 77% | 8068 81% | 8073 81% | 22440 29% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8156 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 90 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 36 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 54 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| 1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AndroBench 3-5 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Random Read 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Random Write 4KB (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 | |
| Huawei Y5 II | |
| TP-Link Neffos C5 | |
| Wiko Lenny 3 | |
| LG K7 | |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 26 fps | ||
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Settings | Value | ||
| high | 11 fps | ||
| very low | 20 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
Lenovo Moto E3 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei Y5 II audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 13% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (34% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 92% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
| Off / Standby |   0.06 / 0.31 Watt |
| Idle |  0.79 / 1.7 / 1.72 Watt |
| Load |
2.65 / 3.16 Watt |
    
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Moto E3 2800 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh | Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh | LG K7 2125 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -6% | -49% | -41% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 0.79 | 0.54 32% | 0.72 9% | 0.76 4% | 0.61 23% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 1.7 | 1.58 7% | 1.87 -10% | 2.16 -27% | 1.36 20% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 1.72 | 1.7 1% | 2 -16% | 2.35 -37% | 1.38 20% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 2.65 | 2.98 -12% | 5.99 -126% | 4.65 -75% | 3.11 -17% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 3.16 | 4.98 -58% | 6.45 -104% | 5.35 -69% | 3.59 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Moto E3 2800 mAh | Huawei Y5 II 2200 mAh | TP-Link Neffos C5 2200 mAh | Wiko Lenny 3 2000 mAh | LG K7 2125 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -19% | -27% | -31% | -27% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 22.1 | 18.4 -17% | 15.7 -29% | 16.7 -24% | |
| H.264 (h) | 10.8 | 5.2 -52% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.4 | 8.4 -19% | 7.6 -27% | 9.2 -12% | 7.6 -27% |
| Load (h) | 5.3 | 4.2 -21% | 2.6 -51% | 5 -6% |
Pros
Cons
联想致力于在入门级设备领域，在有限的预算情况下，给出更好的配置。优秀的摄像头，可观的续航时间，良好的扬声器，坚固的外壳，让人满意的屏幕，低发热量，实在是低价领域的一股清流。而一般的设备，至少都会在一个方面有妥协。
现在说说“但是”：联想Moto E3的性能有点弱，比不上它的竞争对手。在这台手机上网3D游戏变得不实际，如果强行运行的话，卡顿感会让乐趣荡然无存。而且，不支持双SIM卡。
联想 Moto E3在电池续航时间、摄像头、扬声器方面得分不错。联想在一个低价设备中集合了这么多元素，让人敬佩。只有在性能方面，落后其他同类设备。
鉴于LTE和USB TOG的完美结合、预装程序的减少和清晰化，我们推荐那些不把性能放第一位，而且想要好摄像头和扬声器的用户购买这款手机。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
Lenovo Moto E3
- 03/06/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
