Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 7 scores (from 18 reviews)
Reviews for the Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus
Middle-class with glass. Lenovo's Tab 4 10 Plus is a mid-range tablet with high ambitions. It's aiming to attract buyers by offering a glass rear, generous memory configuration, and front-sided speakers. Find out in the test report whether the available accessory packs turn the tablet into something special.
Source: Trusted Reviews
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionNevertheless, I’d still suggest most people pay the extra and get the 9.7-inch iPad. However, if you’re not into the iOS-ecosystem and prefer Android then you won’t be disappointed with Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus. The screen is good for media, there’s plenty of storage on offer, and it doesn’t disappoint in terms of performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Talk Android
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Lenovo Tab 4 10 was a great tablet for the price, and the Tab 4 10 Plus only adds to that. That 16GB of storage is really painful, but if you’re planning on relying on cloud storage and streaming services (and you don’t mind buying an SD card) this is a really great option for a lot of users. $279 gets you a lot of tablet, and in this price range I think you’d be hard pressed to find a better portable Netflix experience.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/13/2018
Source: Laptop Mag
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Tab 4 10 Plus impresses with its stellar battery life, design and display, but it has some performance issues.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIt’s not a revelation or an iPad-killer, but the Lenovo Tab 4 10 Plus is a solid Android tablet at an attractive price, with a big, decent quality screen and a fairly premium build.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/17/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org version
 EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionHowever, it's simply not as well built or considered as an iPad, despite costing the same sum of money.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Notebooksbilliger Blog
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/22/2017
Source: WinFuture
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/04/2017
Source: Tablet Blog
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/31/2017
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/18/2019
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/06/2019
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/21/2019
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/16/2018
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/24/2018
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/15/2018
Source: Ofertaman
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org version
 ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/06/2017
Source: Smartphone e tablet android
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org version
 IT→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/06/2017
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Lyd og Billede
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org version
 DA→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Mobil.se
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org version
 SV→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/22/2017
Rating: Total score: 66% display: 60%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
625:
中端八核处理器,搭配8个ARM Cortex-A53处理核心,频率最高2GHz,一颗Adreno 506显卡芯片,一个DDR3L-1866内存控制器和X9 LTE(Cat. 7)网络模组。采用最新的14纳米制程技术制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
