Lenovo Moto G5S
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 26 reviews)
Reviews for the Lenovo Moto G5S
Source: Yugatech
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Motorola G5S is a decent smartphone with a premium build and capable specs for its class. However, it’s lacking in multiple aspects and felt like Motorola just stripped down the G5S Plus so they can introduce something at a lower price point. It would have been a worthy offering if it launched in early 2017, but in today’s standards, it doesn’t have enough fire-power to take on the competition.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/16/2018
Source: DxOMark
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionAt an overall score of 69 points, the Motorola Moto G5S is battling for position in our ranking with other mid-range devices such as the Lava Z25 and the Meizu Pro 7 Plus. This said, it even just beats a high-end phone, the Nokia 8, despite lacking a bokeh mode. Unsurprisingly for a device at its price point, it doesn’t come with any smart zoom features, but the G5S is capable of capturing images with good exposure and pleasant colors in good light conditions, and offers an accurate autofocus system in still image mode. The autofocus is less reliable in video mode, but still, at a fraction of the price of current high-end models, the Moto G5S packs a decent camera into an attractive aluminum housing, making it an interesting proposition for budget-conscious mobile photographers.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/31/2018
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe G5s is a good-looking, well-built phone that suffers from below-average performance. Its cameras are good, though, and it has a decent screen.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf you want a mid-range phone with a mid-sized screen, the G5S is a great choice. You do pay quite a bit more than the base model G5, but with that you get a better camera, bigger battery and a slightly larger screen. While performance is nigh-on identical, these extras certainly make it worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionIf you want a mid-range phone with a mid-sized screen, the G5S is a great choice. You do pay quite a bit more than the base model G5, but with that you get a better camera, bigger battery and a slightly larger screen. While performance is nigh-on identical, these extras certainly make it worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech PP
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G series has been known to provide a great experience in smartphones at a pocket-friendly price and at Rs 15,999, the Moto G5s Plus continues the tradition. Yes, people have questioned its specs (especially with the emergence of the likes of Xiaomi) but the company has the happy knack of doing more than enough to retain its faithful. And from our experience, the G5s Plus does that as well – it will not blow you away with spectacular specs but it’s smooth performance and distinct looks will grow on you.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 85% performance: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: NDTV Gadgets
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe smartphone market in India changes rapidly, and Lenovo's decision to launch special editions of the fifth-generation Moto devices seems like a great move - except for buyers of the originals. Both the Moto G5S and Moto G5S Plus offer enhancements that help the company stay fresh and take on recently launched competitors. The dual cameras on the Moto G5S Plus will be a good selling point, especially against the Xiaomi Mi A1 (Review), though the experience still requires some polishing from the company's end. Stock Android is generally always a good thing though it's becoming more common now and less of an advantage for Lenovo. Fast charging support is also a big plus.
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 09/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: NDTV Gadgets
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe Moto G5S Plus and Moto G5S impressed us with their snappy performance in the limited time. Touch inputs and multitasking work well. Cameras on the Moto G5S Plus do seem an upgrade compared to the Moto G5 Plus, in some departments. The depth effect worked smoothly in some samples we clicked. We will, however, reserve our verdict on the Moto G5S Plus and Moto G5S performances and cameras until we get a chance to put them through pace during our detailed review.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 08/30/2017
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionWith only a small difference in its overall size the more powerful Moto G5s Plus with dual-cameras is likely to be the better buy here. However, when you're buying in the budget market price is everything, and the £40 difference could be enough to tip the balance in the favour of the Moto G5s. The smaller model also has the potential to offer longer battery life, but we'll have to wait and see when we get them into our Test Centre.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 08/03/2017
Source: Tech Advisor
EN→zh-CN Archive.org versionThe upgrades might appeal to some, but the big price hike won't. The G5s is better built and battery capacity returns to what it was in the Moto G4, but the new unibody design means the battery is no longer removable. Processing power remains the same, so for many, the original G5 still represents the best value.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 08/02/2017
Source: Chip.de
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% performance: 78% features: 71% display: 811% mobility: 92%
Source: Go2 Mobile
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/05/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: MobiFlip
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android Mag
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/28/2017
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 93% performance: 100% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% features: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100%
Source: Tech Stage
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/06/2017
Source: Curved
DE→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2017
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/29/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/06/2017
Source: Frandroid
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2017
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr
FR→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/03/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Antyweb
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/08/2017
Source: 90 Sekund
PL→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/08/2017
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/31/2017
Source: Ferra.ru
RU→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tek.no
NO→zh-CN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 506:
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
625:
中端八核处理器,搭配8个ARM Cortex-A53处理核心,频率最高2GHz,一颗Adreno 506显卡芯片,一个DDR3L-1866内存控制器和X9 LTE(Cat. 7)网络模组。采用最新的14纳米制程技术制造。
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.