Notebookcheck Logo

联想 IdeaPad Miix 700 变形本简短评测

比Surface Pro更强? 联想将IdeaPad Miix 700的目标定为了潜在的Surface Pro 4消费者。它附赠了一个键盘底座和一支Active Pen,用户不需要单独购买。它的其他特性也十分合理:明亮、高对比度的屏幕以及高速固态硬盘。它搭载的酷睿M处理器保证了无风扇的运行。它的整机价格甚至比配置相当的Surface Pro 4更低。
Convertible / 2-in-1 Skylake Tablet Touchscreen Windows
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 (Miix Series)
Processor
Intel Core m5-6Y54 2 x 1.1 - 2.7 GHz, Skylake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 515, Core: 900 MHz, 双通道, 10.18.15.4281
Memory
4 GB 
, LPDDR3-1866, 双通道, 板载内存
Display
12.00 inch 3:2, 2160 x 1440 pixel, 电容式,10点触控, native pen support, Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Skylake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2, 128 GB 
, 100 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek HD Audio
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 整合音频接口, Card Reader: micro-SD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 位置传感器,亮度传感器, TPM 2.0
Networking
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.5 x 293 x 224
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 500万像素
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 立体声, Keyboard: 孤岛式, Keyboard Light: no, ActivePen, McAfee LiveSafe - Internet Security (试用版), MS Office (试用版), 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.08 kg, Power Supply: 197 g
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

ActivePen with holder
ActivePen with holder
Pen by Wacom.
Pen by Wacom.
330
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung L_QLLTN120QL01L01 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 317.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 341 cd/m²
Contrast: 947:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 8.12 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 200 Hz ≤ 18 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 18 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Grayscale
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps
CalMAN - ColorChecker (post-calibration)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (post-calibration)
CalMAN - Grayscale (post-calibration)
CalMAN - Grayscale (post-calibration)
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps (post-calibration)
CalMAN - Saturation Sweeps (post-calibration)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
IPS, 2160x1440
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
IPS, 2736x1824
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
IPS, 2736x1824
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
IPS, 2736x1824
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
IPS, 2732x2048
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
IPS-Panel, 1920x1080
Display
-1%
-4%
-1%
16%
-34%
Display P3 Coverage
68.1
67.5
-1%
65
-5%
66.9
-2%
91.2
34%
44.4
-35%
sRGB Coverage
97.4
96.6
-1%
96.5
-1%
97.5
0%
98.1
1%
66.4
-32%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.2
69
-2%
67
-5%
68.6
-2%
79.3
13%
45.91
-35%
Response Times
-74%
-74%
1642%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
30 ?(11, 19)
46 ?(17.2, 28.8)
-53%
46 ?(17.2, 28.8, plateau, spikes in between)
-53%
48.4 ?(20.4, 28)
-61%
Response Time Black / White *
16 ?(4.4, 11.6)
31 ?(6, 25.2)
-94%
31.2 ?(6, 25.2, Spikes in between)
-95%
35.6 ?(8, 27.6)
-123%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(18)
50 ?(50)
-75%
50 ?(50)
-75%
10420
5110%
Screen
24%
18%
29%
34%
-12%
Brightness middle
341
389.2
14%
413
21%
436.7
28%
399
17%
364
7%
Brightness
318
392
23%
396
25%
433
36%
393
24%
331
4%
Brightness Distribution
87
92
6%
87
0%
87
0%
92
6%
84
-3%
Black Level *
0.36
0.27
25%
0.36
-0%
0.326
9%
0.22
39%
0.44
-22%
Contrast
947
1441
52%
1147
21%
1340
41%
1814
92%
827
-13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6
3.61
40%
3.09
48%
1.82
70%
2.96
51%
7.32
-22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.12
3.8
53%
3.92
52%
1.44
82%
3
63%
7.37
9%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.16 102%
2.3 96%
2.1 105%
2.21 100%
2.03 108%
CCT
7011 93%
5969 109%
7333 89%
6560 99%
7049 92%
6479 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.4
63
-1%
61
-4%
62.3
-2%
71.15
12%
42.2
-33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.4
97
0%
97
0%
97.5
0%
97.87
0%
66.1
-32%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-17% / -1%
-20% / -5%
557% / 346%
25% / 29%
-23% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6810 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
7979 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
4927 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6820
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
6340
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
3690
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
23.06 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.08 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.06 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
27.55 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
200 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
99 Points
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
200 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
306 Points +53%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
206 Points +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
342 Points +71%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
153 Points -23%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
148 Points -26%
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
99 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
122 Points +23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
88 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
132 Points +33%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
84 Points -15%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
79 Points -20%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2.08 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3.4 Points +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2.27 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
3.8 Points +83%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1.72 Points -17%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1.67 Points -20%
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
1.06 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1.4 Points +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
0.98 Points -8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
1.51 Points +42%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
0.99 Points -7%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
0.93 Points -12%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
6340 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
10558 Points +67%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
6994 Points +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
11564 Points +82%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
5370 Points -15%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
5280 Points -17%
Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3690 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4656 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3286 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
5223 Points +42%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3276 Points -11%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3123 Points -15%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2588 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3085 Points +19%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2088 Points -19%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
5189 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
6419 Points +24%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3476 Points -33%
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
97.8 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
104.5 ms * -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
122.4 ms * -25%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
181 ms * -85%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
133.4 ms * -36%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
145 ms * -48%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
169.9 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
142 Points -16%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
67 Points -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
1312 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1178 ms * +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1556 ms * -19%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
1499 ms * -14%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2898 ms * -121%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3086 ms * -135%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
26885 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
29991 Points +12%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
19852 Points -26%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
10467 Points -61%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
10827 Points -60%
Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2295 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2998 Points +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
2216 Points -3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx, A9X, Apple 128 GB (iPad Pro 12.9 NVMe)
5417 Points +136%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2222 Points -3%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1946 Points -15%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
4518 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2733 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3344 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3837 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3837 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3697 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
3186 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
4052 Points +6%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3480 Points -9%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3574 Points -7%
PCMark 7 - Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
4518 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
5229 Points +16%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4274 Points -5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
5799 Points +28%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
4087 Points -10%
Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
Sequential Read: 497.9 MB/s
Sequential Write: 153.5 MB/s
512K Read: 401.2 MB/s
512K Write: 154.5 MB/s
4K Read: 36.2 MB/s
4K Write: 95.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 389.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 154 MB/s
3DMark 06 Standard Score
5842 points
3DMark 11 Performance
1109 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
38523 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
3936 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
630 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
1109 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1344 Points +21%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
1565 Points +41%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
2624 Points +137%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
625 Points -44%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
699 Points -37%
3DMark
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
38523 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
42046 Points +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
51010 Points +32%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
73990 Points +92%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
29336 Points -24%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
30390 Points -21%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
3936 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
4604 Points +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
5853 Points +49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
7822 Points +99%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
2946 Points -25%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
3064 Points -22%
1280x720 Sky Diver Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
2316 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
4699 Points +103%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
1439 Points -38%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
630 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
740 Points +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
844 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
1395 Points +121%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
371 Points -41%
Fujitsu Stylistic Q665
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y31, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
409 Points -35%
3DMark 06 - 1280x1024 Standard Score AA:0x AF:0x (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
5842 Points
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
7733 Points +32%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
4144 Points -29%
low med. high ultra
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011) 50 27.2 11.2
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011) 31.1 18.7 11.6 7.1
Diablo III (2012) 61.9 41.8 35.1 20.5
Counter-Strike: GO (2012) 76.7 57.3 35.1 20.2
Tomb Raider (2013) 45.3 23 16.3 7.2
BioShock Infinite (2013) 33.1 18.5 15.4 4.7
GRID: Autosport (2014) 86.5 26.3 14.9 12.5
Sims 4 (2014) 161.1 39.2 17.1 10.4
F1 2014 (2014) 41 28 17 12.5
Battlefield Hardline (2015) 22.1 18.1 6.8 4.1
Dirt Rally (2015) 65.7 14.4 12.5 12.5
World of Warships (2015) 42.8 26.3 12.7 7.4
Anno 2205 (2015) 15.5 9.3
Star Wars Battlefront (2015) 18.7 10.4
BioShock Infinite
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
33.1 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
52.4 fps +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
58.1 fps +76%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
86.8 fps +162%
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value)
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2
18.5 fps
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
26.93 fps +46%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung MZFLV128 NVMe
30 fps +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
Iris Graphics 540, 6650U, Samsung MZFLV256 NVMe
49.1 fps +165%
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y51, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
12.3 fps -34%
Max. Load
 29.8 °C33.3 °C36.8 °C 
 30.2 °C34.5 °C37.4 °C 
 34.1 °C37.2 °C38.6 °C 
Maximum: 38.6 °C
Average: 34.7 °C
40.8 °C35.5 °C31.1 °C
38.7 °C36.6 °C30.6 °C
33.7 °C31.2 °C28.6 °C
Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  36.5 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-10.5 °C / -18.9 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
6Y54, HD Graphics 515
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
6Y30, HD Graphics 515
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
6650U, Iris Graphics 540
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
5Y51, HD Graphics 5300
Heat
-9%
-33%
2%
-7%
2%
Maximum Upper Side *
38.6
43.6
-13%
52.3
-35%
45.4
-18%
40.1
-4%
36.6
5%
Maximum Bottom *
40.8
45.2
-11%
51.4
-26%
43.2
-6%
39.3
4%
37.3
9%
Idle Upper Side *
30.4
32.4
-7%
43.2
-42%
25.2
17%
33.8
-11%
30.5
-0%
Idle Bottom *
28
29.6
-6%
36
-29%
24
14%
32.9
-18%
29.9
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.4 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4 / 8.6 / 9.3 Watt
Load midlight 18.6 / 36.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
6Y54, HD Graphics 515
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
6300U, HD Graphics 520
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
A9X, A9X / PowerVR GT7xxx
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
5Y51, HD Graphics 5300
Power Consumption
2%
18%
48%
Idle Minimum *
4
4.4
-10%
2.69
33%
1.5
62%
Idle Average *
8.6
9
-5%
10.95
-27%
4
53%
Idle Maximum *
9.3
10.7
-15%
11.14
-20%
5
46%
Load Average *
18.6
19.6
-5%
11.54
38%
13.9
25%
Load Maximum *
36.3
19.9
45%
12.8
65%
16.9
53%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 21min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 25.10586.0.0)
7h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 30min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 37min
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700
41 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core m3
38 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4, Core i5, 128GB
38 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro 4 Core i7
38 Wh
Apple iPad Pro 12.9
39 Wh
HP Elite x2 1011 G1
54 Wh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-9%
-36%
62%
51%
Reader / Idle
861
791
-8%
899
4%
654
-24%
1933
125%
1063
23%
H.264
450
630
40%
658
46%
WiFi v1.3
440
488
11%
427
-3%
293
-33%
695
58%
675
53%
Load
157
138
-12%
111
-29%
79
-50%
195
24%
288
83%

Pros

+ 明亮,高对比度的IPS屏幕
+ 无风扇运行
+ M.2固态硬盘
+ 硬盘底座
+ 手写笔
+ 非常优秀的电池续航

Cons

- 多线程处理时有降频
- 显卡降频
- 机身不够坚固
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700-12ISK Pro. Test model courtesy of Campuspoint
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700-12ISK Pro. Test model courtesy of Campuspoint

联想的IdeaPad Miix 700是他们产品线中全新的一台优雅平板/变形本,它给了我们很好的第一印象。搭载的酷睿M处理器为日常使用提供了足够的运算性能。尽管采用了被动散热,它可以保持一定的性能——至少在单线程运行时。在多任务处理中它的性能有些(小)下降。它的显卡核心无法发挥全部性能。它甚至无法在冷启动后达到芯片较弱的Core m3 Surface Pro 4的性能水平。

这让人怀疑联想是否应该为它搭配一块酷睿m3处理器。这块酷睿m5处理器只能稍稍领先Surface Pro 4的酷睿m3。联想应该为Miix 700增加一个采用酷睿m3的入门型号,它应该会让这款设备更有竞争力。

处理器被动散热的一个好处在于无噪音的运行。对于所有的Miix 700都是如此。联想为这个系列机型全部搭配了酷睿M系列处理器。它除了电子噪音外不会有其它的声音。它搭配的固态硬盘保证了高速的系统运行。它可以定制更换更高容量。Miix 700的屏幕整体上可以让人满意。它十分明亮,对比度高且可视角度稳定。它的色彩还原也十分优秀——在校对之后。非常优秀的电池续航为它的整体表现画上了完满的句点。

在Miix 700和酷睿m3 Surface Pro 4之间很难决出一个胜者。

这两台设备都具备另一方没有的优秀特质。Miix 700售价较低——而Surface Pro 4提供了更明亮、对比度更高的屏幕。微软为Surface Pro设计了很多独特的配件——联想的Miix 700有搭配LTE网络模组的型号。哪一款更适合就需要消费者自己决定了。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里 

Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 700 - 08/22/2016 v5.1(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
83 / 98 → 84%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
44 / 80 → 55%
Weight
74 / 35-78 → 91%
Battery
89%
Display
84%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
75 / 87 → 86%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
68 / 91 → 75%
Camera
50 / 85 → 59%
Average
74%
84%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想 IdeaPad Miix 700 变形本简短评测
Sascha Mölck, 2016-02- 6 (Update: 2016-02- 6)